Video není dostupné.
Omlouváme se.

Equilibrium Made Easy: How to Solve Chemical Equilibrium Problems

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 19. 08. 2024
  • What is dynamic equilibrium? How can you easily solve equilibrium problems in chemistry? Learn this and more...
    For a limited time, get $200 cash if you qualify! Check out:
    www.referyourc...
    #chemistry #equilibrium #madeeasy #ketzbook #tutorial

Komentáře • 79

  • @Exemplary832
    @Exemplary832 Před rokem +14

    Nonsense

  • @lyra331
    @lyra331 Před 3 lety +65

    hi! I am dyscauculic with ADHD and I've been for like, 3 years without understanding chemistry trying my hardest, usually I don't watch youtube classes cause they don't make any difference, I normally don't understand, but WOW for the first time i got something, like, in my life. I even cried a little. thank you so much, you're a hero professor!

  • @khushisoam8068
    @khushisoam8068 Před 3 lety +37

    I never knew that I could learn the topic of 5 hrs in 12 mins ! TYSM

  • @obama8573
    @obama8573 Před 3 lety +21

    The one who made this video is a legend 💯

  • @rationalism_communism
    @rationalism_communism Před 5 měsíci +2

    I was very confused but after watching lots of videos and the same scenarios come up, I leaned quadratic equations and now I get it. It took a week.

  • @brianottenbreit871
    @brianottenbreit871 Před 3 lety +9

    I see below that someone pointed out that deriving the rate of the forward and backward reactions cannot be done by looking at the coefficients., but rather must be experimentally determined. The equilibrium constant can, however, be found by the coefficients. Kr and Keq are fundamentally different as can be seen if you do the work to find the units.

  • @damtewbogale6794
    @damtewbogale6794 Před 3 měsíci

    The most comprehensive video about chemical equilibrium on YT

  • @jeremiakasinda7695
    @jeremiakasinda7695 Před 5 lety +12

    Thank you allot, this will really help tomorrow in my Chemistry 1A exam.

  • @home-sauce
    @home-sauce Před 5 lety +8

    this is pretty important for the AP chem test

  • @taurus7261
    @taurus7261 Před 2 lety +7

    I have a question regarding the last problem. Why is that the reactant gained the +2x as its change in molarity when the whole reaction is product favored based on the value of Kc?

  • @chandrashekarhb9349
    @chandrashekarhb9349 Před 4 lety +6

    Excellent and nicely explained. You are a good teacher.

  • @Nicole-tb6iw
    @Nicole-tb6iw Před 3 lety +6

    thank you so much, it's brief and easily understood

  • @luke5385
    @luke5385 Před 7 měsíci

    this is so high quality and well explained. ty!

  • @albertlonga6995
    @albertlonga6995 Před rokem +1

    I am enjoying , bcoz of what you are explaining it is easy to understand , thank you!

  • @katherinelee2690
    @katherinelee2690 Před 3 lety +4

    literally thank u so much, this was so helpful

  • @Anime_world_india78
    @Anime_world_india78 Před 3 lety +5

    Can you please make a video about physics
    Topic: simple harmonic oscillation (S.H.O)

  • @BeatriceAntwi-kj8ry
    @BeatriceAntwi-kj8ry Před 11 měsíci +1

    For the last question, why wasn't the moles(0.95) changed into molar concentration by dividing by 10L?

    • @ketzbook
      @ketzbook  Před 10 měsíci

      it is a 1.0 L container, not 10 L. If it were 10 L, we should divide by 10.

  • @saikumar.d7101
    @saikumar.d7101 Před 4 lety +3

    Thank u sir ur video is too good
    Please make up like this cideos

  • @respectanyone117
    @respectanyone117 Před rokem

    After struggling so much I finally found this video

  • @lillymaewilcox31
    @lillymaewilcox31 Před 4 měsíci

    Thank you so much, you're a life saver

  • @anni2165
    @anni2165 Před 4 lety +2

    Good & helpful explain👍
    This video help me a lot to understand this subtopic more
    Thank you

  • @Remember_e
    @Remember_e Před 4 měsíci

    The equilibrium concentration of CCl4 must be 0.024 moles.

  • @rassimsimou1594
    @rassimsimou1594 Před 6 měsíci +1

    Good

  • @andreazuliani7004
    @andreazuliani7004 Před 2 lety +1

    I am finding this way more complicate than how explained in my class.. I don't understand all the x and those extra calculations here

  • @taranjotkaur4831
    @taranjotkaur4831 Před 5 lety +4

    plz make a video on organic chemistry

    • @ketzbook
      @ketzbook  Před 5 lety

      what specifically? OChem is a very big topic.

    • @taranjotkaur4831
      @taranjotkaur4831 Před 5 lety +3

      @@ketzbook
      electrophillic nd nucleophillic subsitution reactions

  • @user-ce9ko6eg3w
    @user-ce9ko6eg3w Před 8 měsíci

    Why dividing the conc of NO2 BY N2O4 instead of other way round since NO2 a product not a reactant in example 2???

  • @bettan369
    @bettan369 Před 3 lety +1

    amazing explanation. thank you!

  • @meebee5189
    @meebee5189 Před 3 lety +1

    Sorry Im a little confused at 3:10 how did u derive the rate equation for the Haber process from the stoichiometric ratios? I see how you are trying to derive K from the rate constants but... the order of a reaction is not equivalent to the coefficients from the equation.

    • @ketzbook
      @ketzbook  Před 3 lety +1

      most often the rate law can be taken from the coefficients of the balanced equation, although you are correct that there are many exceptions to that, and you need to do kinetic studies to determine it. However, I did not intend to go through exceptions in a video that focuses on the basics. Equilibrium is intricately tied to kinetics. One may incorrectly think, for example, that the equilibrium expression of an Sn1 reaction is different from that of an Sn2 reaction; however, both reactions include the activity of the nucleophile in the equilibrium expression because the true full rate law of an Sn1 reaction actually includes the nucleophile and the leaving group. That is just one exception.

  • @hunnidasiago746
    @hunnidasiago746 Před 2 lety +1

    Surprisingly...my lecturer watches your videos...uses ur concepts...and your questions too😂...I'm getting my fees back

  • @kishamuringani9331
    @kishamuringani9331 Před 3 lety +1

    can you please make a video mainly on examples of questions on equillibrium

  • @nt-qb5pb
    @nt-qb5pb Před 4 lety +2

    we want more and more videos

  • @BoonkiCoC14
    @BoonkiCoC14 Před 3 lety

    Jeez, did i just understand this? Yes i did, sir. Thanks a lot, my book has spent around 20 pages talking about this but it makes no fucking sense. Thank you!!!!

  • @user-uk7zv1ks8x
    @user-uk7zv1ks8x Před 7 měsíci

    Hi!I am chiamaka pls how did u get the value of x as 0.2
    I means what was the quadratic equation you used to have the value of x.Thanks

  • @rosemin1973
    @rosemin1973 Před 2 lety +1

    hey..with the last question i don't get why we had -x and not +x

  • @user-ze3bc9yb9y
    @user-ze3bc9yb9y Před 4 lety +2

    Can you please make a video on hydrogen and proton nmr spectrum

  • @atanursaparbaev9691
    @atanursaparbaev9691 Před 2 lety

    Thanks very much!!!!

  • @chandrasai1990
    @chandrasai1990 Před 3 lety

    thanks from India class 11 preparation for jee mains

  • @nnk2874
    @nnk2874 Před 2 lety

    I feel like you confused the molarity of CCl4 to be .176 when in fact in appears to be the value we used to plug into X. CCl4 should be .024 molarity. Therefore, in the fraction where you have Kc = (2(.024))^2 / .176 ---> .176 should instead be .024.

    • @ketzbook
      @ketzbook  Před 2 lety

      nope, 0.176 comes right from the data in the question. It is correct.

  • @moengpasela773
    @moengpasela773 Před 3 lety +1

    how did u calculate initial molarity and equilibrium molarity

    • @ketzbook
      @ketzbook  Před 3 lety

      czcams.com/video/KLjWa9cE2uk/video.html

  • @vickysilver8509
    @vickysilver8509 Před 2 lety +1

    Thanks

  • @pinkflower88
    @pinkflower88 Před 4 měsíci

    7:45 can somebody explain what he just did here, why 0.88÷5, please explain

    • @rishmakumar3644
      @rishmakumar3644 Před 3 měsíci +1

      He did this to get it into the concentration, i.e. [concentration (M or mol/L) = moles (mol)/volume (L)], since Kc is measured using the concentrations of each reactant and product. If he did not divide 0.88mol/5L to get 0.176mol/L then he would've only had the moles.
      He also converted the moles of CCl4 to concentration in the beginning too.
      Sorry if my explanation is a bit all over the place. Hope this helps

  • @makaylahawkins9702
    @makaylahawkins9702 Před 2 lety

    How do you get those initial molarities

  • @geralddemafilez4926
    @geralddemafilez4926 Před 7 měsíci

    i think you forgot to square the molarity of NO2

  • @anwarvictor9448
    @anwarvictor9448 Před 2 lety

    great!!!!

  • @janetnkrumah542
    @janetnkrumah542 Před 3 lety

    Thanks a lot sir

  • @jishakjishak4698
    @jishakjishak4698 Před 3 lety

    Thanks for such a fine class

  • @cathystacy9810
    @cathystacy9810 Před 3 lety +1

    Cleveland clinic

  • @chamasayasianjina2081
    @chamasayasianjina2081 Před 3 lety

    Where is the 0.024 coming from??

  • @pynthymmailangdkhar1403

    Is this for class 12?

  • @rajatdas5500
    @rajatdas5500 Před 3 lety

    ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

  • @RebelRelatives
    @RebelRelatives Před 11 měsíci

    Gimme the I30N thee 8 GTI/R Killer
    But how can u start 5:04 😂😂😂😂 and im with you 600K for a Hatchback 5:54 yooo😂😂😂😂 i rather get an old RS3 or old A45 with +/- 150k km

  • @aurangzaibkhan543
    @aurangzaibkhan543 Před 3 lety

    You are great but 2.8+4.4=6.12and you say that it is 2+2+1.6=5.6

  • @feifeiiii
    @feifeiiii Před 2 lety

    9:18

  • @joy_meme
    @joy_meme Před 2 lety

    👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

  • @joy_meme
    @joy_meme Před 2 lety

    👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌

  • @user-wx2dg7cg6s
    @user-wx2dg7cg6s Před 5 měsíci

    Pls I understand nothing

  • @thepelicanman7436
    @thepelicanman7436 Před rokem

    I f*cking hate physics sometimes

  • @schneiderwanjia3433
    @schneiderwanjia3433 Před rokem

    Thanks

  • @janetnkrumah542
    @janetnkrumah542 Před 3 lety

    Thanks a lot sir