How Kilonovas Made the Earth and Killed Alternate Gravity - Ask a Spaceman!

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 4. 06. 2024
  • Full podcast episodes: www.askaspaceman.com
    Support: / pmsutter
    Follow: / paulmattsutter and / paulmattsutter
    Part 2 of 2! How did the observation of a kilonova change astronomy? How did that one observation kill off alternate models of gravity? What’s in store for the future of gravitational waves? I discuss these questions and more in today’s Ask a Spaceman!
    Follow all the show updates at www.askaspaceman.com, and help support the show at / pmsutter !
    Keep those questions about space, science, astronomy, astrophysics, and cosmology coming to #AskASpaceman for COMPLETE KNOWLEDGE OF TIME AND SPACE! Music by Jason Grady and Nick Bain.
    Chapters:
    00:00 One Afternoon in 2017
    04:11 What is a Kilonova
    09:23 What Happens During a Kilonova Explosion
    14:40 How One Measurement Killed Alternate Gravity
    15:50 The Future of Multi-Messenger Astronomy
    Video credits: NASA, ESA, Planck, WMAP, Illustris
  • Věda a technologie

Komentáře • 421

  • @ChaosAttractor13
    @ChaosAttractor13 Před 11 měsíci +8

    My girlfriend in college signed up to take Astronomy for a semester. She wanted to learn how to tell fortunes. I had a very difficult time explaining why Astrology and Astronomy are not the same thing. Her argument was they both study stars. I gave up. Two years later, she is on the Deans list and made A’s in both the Astronomy classes she took. I had flunked out because I can’t do math. I don’t belong in this world. 😭😭😭😭😭

  • @ryleexiii1252
    @ryleexiii1252 Před 2 lety +12

    > “It’s not gonna be pretty”
    > Immediately shows an absolutely beautiful animation of a kilonova

  • @michaelzumpano7318
    @michaelzumpano7318 Před 11 měsíci +49

    You’re an excellent speaker and teacher. This is the first time I’ve received a youtube recommendation for your channel. Subscribed!

    • @murraynickel6377
      @murraynickel6377 Před 11 měsíci +3

      Same for me. Thankyou Paul, that was a fascinating and clear video.

    • @lugyd1xdone195
      @lugyd1xdone195 Před 11 měsíci +1

      Same

    • @godagarah-kf1vk
      @godagarah-kf1vk Před 10 měsíci

      same for me as well very educational

    • @0neIntangible
      @0neIntangible Před 7 měsíci

      As a recently new subscriber, I love his knowledge and passion for these interesting topics.

  • @okd521
    @okd521 Před rokem +112

    When I hear about killanovas I always think about the lesser-known Godzillanovas, that can only be seen from Japan

    • @olecranonrebellion9976
      @olecranonrebellion9976 Před 11 měsíci +19

      Someone once found a kilo of cocaine in the Dash of a 73 ss Nova

    • @okd521
      @okd521 Před 11 měsíci

      @@olecranonrebellion9976 I once found an ounce of cocaine. Since I'm virtually immune to it it didn't do shit for me

    • @josephjohnson3738
      @josephjohnson3738 Před 11 měsíci +5

      Just as likely to exist too.

    • @roseCatcher_
      @roseCatcher_ Před 11 měsíci +10

      They can actually be observed using the LIGMA observatories situated at Nintendo headquarters.

    • @Dice-Z
      @Dice-Z Před 11 měsíci

      ​@@roseCatcher_ Ligma double colliding neutron stars.

  • @tombock336
    @tombock336 Před 2 lety +66

    The fact that this is what goes on in the universe we live in. 🤯. Incredible.

    • @Whiteshoelace
      @Whiteshoelace Před 2 lety

      Incredible compared to what?

    • @weluvmike
      @weluvmike Před 2 lety +2

      100!! Simply Astounding; *Compared to The Mundane!!

    • @kereiltutt5769
      @kereiltutt5769 Před 2 lety +4

      @@Whiteshoelace events like this dont really have to compare to anything...they are pretty incredible in their own right

    • @InfamousX1000
      @InfamousX1000 Před 2 lety +3

      @@Whiteshoelace compared to what we used to think about the universe basically. The concept of dead matter is often used to describe matter in the sense that it is simply a material object that exists in space posing no will of its own, yet we keep discovering these amazing things that it can do. I know, technically matter shows no will of it’s own, but from everything I’ve learned about matter is that it is definitely not dead. Our understanding of our universe keeps expanding with each generation, what we know now might not even be the most amazing thing the next generation knows.

    • @joselucnico
      @joselucnico Před rokem

      Yes and in the same time, missiles fall on Ukraine, incredible.

  • @larryyoung5757
    @larryyoung5757 Před rokem +46

    How incredibly interesting and insightful. It makes one humble to appreciate even a small aspect of the universe so long ago.

  • @lastsilhouette85
    @lastsilhouette85 Před 2 lety +112

    and omg....dude, the universe just looked at our new theories and was just like "hah, nope!" Dozens of theories just all died in one fell swoop! That's intense.

    • @bgbraker
      @bgbraker Před 11 měsíci +4

      Where should we be mining this gold?

    • @Chrisdemartell
      @Chrisdemartell Před 11 měsíci

      ​❤❤❤😊😊😊😊😊
      .... . .....
      P
      Pl.... .

    • @wayneyadams
      @wayneyadams Před 11 měsíci +1

      When you say "The Universe" I assume you mean God, because the Universe has no consciousness.

    • @Sonny_McMacsson
      @Sonny_McMacsson Před 11 měsíci +6

      @@wayneyadams Wrong

    • @wayneyadams
      @wayneyadams Před 11 měsíci +4

      @@Sonny_McMacsson I yield! The supreme authority on everything in the universe has made his declaration, I am wrong! So you as the final arbiter of everything is saying the universe is conscious.

  • @georgetate6055
    @georgetate6055 Před 11 měsíci +9

    I've just finished watching . . . what a great video! Something I somehow missed is the 2017 Kilonova! How could I have missed this huge event?
    Thank you!

  • @Tread69
    @Tread69 Před 2 lety +16

    Keep it up Paul, you make what I’ve always found interesting, even more so.

  • @markusmencke8059
    @markusmencke8059 Před 2 lety +8

    13:40 the gamma should be later by tangling with matter, not faster?

    • @chaz693
      @chaz693 Před 2 lety +3

      I think that was a slip up. Earlier in the video he said the opposite. He's an excellent communicator otherwise.

  • @tracytomlinson2888
    @tracytomlinson2888 Před 11 měsíci +4

    That explanation was so illuminating. Thanks for making it palatable for someone who loves this subject with very little knowledge of physics.

  • @goncalocarvalho4917
    @goncalocarvalho4917 Před 2 lety +6

    Very good video,. Great communicator indeed, explaining complex stuff with humor and accessibility, well done

  • @AlienRelics
    @AlienRelics Před 11 měsíci +4

    5:47 If the gravity were so strong that light could orbit, it would be a black hole, not a neutron star.

    • @dankoppel6271
      @dankoppel6271 Před 5 dny

      For a black hole, light orbits at 1.5 times the Schwarzschild radius while typical neutron star radii are 3 times the Schwarzschild radius so yes that seems right. By the way, the light orbits around a BH are not stable so they only have somewhat academic existence.

  • @MIN0RITY-REP0RT
    @MIN0RITY-REP0RT Před 11 měsíci +5

    More good information here, less hiding behind "Relativity this or that", and someone actually being able to say upfront they don't know what "dark energy" is.

  • @jamesharmer9293
    @jamesharmer9293 Před 2 lety +10

    Just saw one of Paul's videos from back in 2017 and I'm so glad to see how much healthier he looks in this video. I don't know whether it was a severe attack of jaundice or just a dodgy video camera, but it's nice to see that he's not about to drop dead from liver failure.

    • @FaxanaduJohn
      @FaxanaduJohn Před 2 lety +7

      I’ve been watching Sutter for at least that long and that’s definitely a bit over the top.

  • @robertcongdon6296
    @robertcongdon6296 Před 2 lety +27

    A truly informative and excellent episode Paul !

    • @squirlmy
      @squirlmy Před 11 měsíci

      truly a work of slack?

  • @shadowpoet4398
    @shadowpoet4398 Před 11 měsíci +9

    I've been obsessed with exotic quasars forever... This is one of the most exciting things I've ever heard. Thank you Mr. Einstein, for making your own observation and giving these fine young people a target to reach. The truest words a scientist can utter are "I hope you can prove me wrong."

    • @wayneyadams
      @wayneyadams Před 11 měsíci +2

      My graduate research in the 1980s was on quasars back when we did not know what they were.

    • @smo-king6504
      @smo-king6504 Před 11 měsíci

      @@wayneyadams tell us more please!

    • @AdrianMartan
      @AdrianMartan Před 11 měsíci

      @@smo-king6504 There's no universe as they want us to believe.
      Heliocentric model theory is a fairy tale for adults.

  • @cheekiblin690
    @cheekiblin690 Před rokem +10

    A little long but still a great video! Gravitational waves sound so amazing and so terrifying at the same time!

  • @richardhoover4471
    @richardhoover4471 Před 2 lety +6

    Wow! Just wow!! So glad I live in this universe!

  • @dragonrabbit7410
    @dragonrabbit7410 Před 10 měsíci

    great telling of a significant scientific event! somehow i either missed hearing about it or had forgotten about reading it in a headline. very informative!

  • @bernardputersznit64
    @bernardputersznit64 Před rokem +2

    GREAT WORK THIS - PLEASE DO KEEP IT UP

  • @dalelerette206
    @dalelerette206 Před 9 měsíci

    August 2017 something big happened. This 'gravitational wave' was significantly longer.
    It is interesting to note: The solar eclipse of August 21, 2017, dubbed the "Great American Eclipse" by some media, was a total solar eclipse visible within a band that spanned the contiguous United States from the Pacific to the Atlantic coasts. It was also visible as a partial solar eclipse from as far north as Nunavut in northern Canada to as far south as northern South America. In northwestern Europe and Africa, it was partially visible in the late evening. In northeastern Asia, it was partially visible at sunrise.

  • @montanateri6889
    @montanateri6889 Před 11 měsíci +11

    Wow, this was utterly facinating! You are so clear, so understandable for a layman, (why 'layman"? I'm a lay-grandma😀 ) This ties so much knowlege to a single event, and of course (!) there are emails flying when something is observed, no longer is cosmic events something that people find out about years later, this is shared in a second flat, a "hey, turn your telescope to x spot in the sky!" what a wonderous time of expanding knowledge we are all in!
    You popped up in my youtube vids list, and what a find you are! I've subscribed and will flip backwards to watch prior vids and that is exciting to me!

    • @FatT45
      @FatT45 Před 11 měsíci

      Hey Revelations tells us that in the last days knowledge will be increased and people will move to and fro across the Earth! May all come to the glory of Jesus so that all heads are bowed and knees bent! God bless you

    • @Scapestoat
      @Scapestoat Před 11 měsíci

      @@FatT45 There's a cool science grandma geeking out, and your first thought was "I should spout some vague pointless religion at her"?
      Jesus would be disappointed in you.

  • @jamesshevnin981
    @jamesshevnin981 Před 11 měsíci +1

    Is there any way to learn what applications & renderers were used to create this amazing imagery?

  • @ballBozeman
    @ballBozeman Před 2 lety +1

    Thanks. I learned so much.

  • @daffidavit
    @daffidavit Před 11 měsíci

    Excellent presentation. Thank you, professor.

  • @goemboeck
    @goemboeck Před 11 měsíci

    A great passionate presentation, thank you!

  • @kaia.giermann5239
    @kaia.giermann5239 Před 10 měsíci

    dr. paul m.sutter: At 13:45 - I don't understand why the gamma rays arrived first if they interact more with the environment (and of course the impact came first, that makes the grav waves and then the explosion making the emp) or is it just mixed up in the explanation or did I got something wrong as a non native speaker?

  • @davecurtis8833
    @davecurtis8833 Před 2 lety +1

    Great video Paul

  • @Mr.Nichan
    @Mr.Nichan Před 11 měsíci +1

    13:40 If the gamma rays and the gravitational rays were emited at the same time, and the gamma rays got blocked or deflected more than the gravitational waves, then the gravitational waves would arrive first. Thus, your explanation makes it sound like it IS surprising that the gamma rays arrived first. This problem is easily solved if we just assume that they were emitted first, though.

  • @mikolajtrzeciecki1188
    @mikolajtrzeciecki1188 Před 11 měsíci +3

    I am very happy that Heavy Metal creation resonates so positively in Space, and has been doing so at least for 140 mln yrs.

  • @willinwoods
    @willinwoods Před 2 lety +2

    Great vid, thanks!

  • @richardknott2021
    @richardknott2021 Před 10 měsíci

    Excellent presentation..

  • @granadosvm
    @granadosvm Před 11 měsíci

    Great video!
    Informative, provides all kind of reviewable sources, so anyone with more interest can dive deeper. 👍
    Gained a subscriber.

  • @johnkufeldt3564
    @johnkufeldt3564 Před 11 měsíci +1

    Thanks for educating me, Liked and subbed. Cheers from Calgary. It only took me 6 years to find out that a once in a 100000 year event happened during my ever so brief blip of time we all spend together on our little blue marble.

  • @mistyjohnson4794
    @mistyjohnson4794 Před 4 měsíci

    Thank you so much for your expert explanations. I love how you bring with your personality and make it more fun and interesting especially your sense of humor! And I love the word, modern day, slang, urban dictionary, definitions you give! Instead of all the textbook craziness that science gives! Never stop being you !! You bring fun and life to the story! Thank you

  • @Cliff.Hanger
    @Cliff.Hanger Před 11 měsíci +1

    Paul, can you please clarify. You said something twice which appears to me to be contradictory. You said that the gravitational waves are launched first and the gamma are held up a while. Yes, I believe that is the case. But you also said that the gamma rays were detected 1.3 seconds before the gravitational waves (time stamp 13:50). Did you mean the gravitational waves appear first then the gamma rays arrive 1.3 seconds after?

  • @yolyrom7233
    @yolyrom7233 Před 11 měsíci

    Excellent info

  • @dark808bb8
    @dark808bb8 Před 2 lety +1

    amazing stuff!

  • @wayneyadams
    @wayneyadams Před 11 měsíci +5

    The universe is absolutely incredible. I am still in awe of what goes on. We know so much more than we did when I was in graduate school in the 1980s. Heck, we were still not sure what quasars were. My professor was still doing research on quasars. Now, a mere 40 years or so later, not only have we solved that problem, but have gotten to the stage where we can detect gravitational waves and identify the event from which they emanated.

    • @chrismay25
      @chrismay25 Před 11 měsíci

      Whats even funnier is what we “thought” a year ago has already changed haha. Hence “science” what we really do not know but what we think until proven wrong lmfao

  • @JessieJussMessy
    @JessieJussMessy Před 11 měsíci

    Spectacular presentation of a spectacular event

  •  Před 2 lety

    Great video. Thanks

  • @wicked1172
    @wicked1172 Před 10 měsíci

    I love the intellectual stimulation, kudos !

  • @FaxanaduJohn
    @FaxanaduJohn Před 2 lety +2

    Deserves way more subs!

  • @MelvinCruz
    @MelvinCruz Před 10 měsíci

    A few days prior to watching this video a friend of mine that is history professor tells me she don't watch CZcams videos because that are not a scientific paper...so bad for her because a paper never will explain in few words how really something affects scientific knowledge that includes the study of history. Thanks for this fantastic video.

  • @johnh539
    @johnh539 Před 11 měsíci

    beautifully explained.

  • @markkrill
    @markkrill Před 11 měsíci

    Great explanation of killonovas

  • @kurthanson4106
    @kurthanson4106 Před 11 měsíci

    I'm picking up on your passion... and I like it.

  • @aforementioned7177
    @aforementioned7177 Před 10 měsíci

    Absolutely, mind bogglingly amazing.

  • @nettewilson5926
    @nettewilson5926 Před 11 měsíci +1

    So cool to learn how heavier elements are created and that they are not created in supernovas (which I think I had learned at this be point)! But how can you say a kilo nova is not as powerful as a supernova since it creates such large gravitational waves?

  • @QuartuvLarry
    @QuartuvLarry Před 11 měsíci

    Made in 2021. Got a HUGE gamma ray burst this last October. Came from over 2 billion light years distant, but was still strong enough to make our atmosphere expand for about 2 hours

  • @TerryBollinger
    @TerryBollinger Před 11 měsíci +1

    Nice analysis. Also, I learned that the official name for heavy-element generating neutron star collisions is "kilonova."

  • @rolie9403
    @rolie9403 Před 8 měsíci

    The fake typing at 0:36 kills me 😂

  • @MonsterSound
    @MonsterSound Před 2 lety +1

    I felt that bro. Take care and thanks. 😎👍

  • @markscheinfeld3020
    @markscheinfeld3020 Před 11 měsíci

    New to channel...subscribed.

  • @onebylandtwoifbysearunifby5475
    @onebylandtwoifbysearunifby5475 Před 11 měsíci +1

    13:50 You messed-up there.
    Gamma rays (γ-ray) are light, which interact with EM, so would be the ones to get tangled-up, and should arrive _AFTER_ gravitational waves (by your explanation). Pin a correction perhaps, with a new explanation? 📌

  • @user-yz5em8xr1h
    @user-yz5em8xr1h Před 11 měsíci

    Exciting stuff! It fills one of the multitude of gaps in our understanding of our Universe!

  • @stevenpilling5318
    @stevenpilling5318 Před 11 měsíci +1

    I had no idea that LIGO's kilonova event was of such importance!

  • @sidviscous5959
    @sidviscous5959 Před 11 měsíci +1

    But I thought Einstein maintained that gravity was an artifact of curved space-time. If gravity is instead a wave, then what energy is carried by this wave and how does it interact with matter? If gravity waves exist, shouldn't we be able to create a "tractor beam" like they had on Star Trek? And ultimately shouldn't we be able to create antigravity devices? And since time and space are the same thing, according to Einstein, if we can control gravity, shouldn't we be able to create a "time machine"? Enquiring minds want to know.

    • @nutbunny10
      @nutbunny10 Před 11 měsíci +1

      The wave is an oscillation of space-time & so it's a periodic bending of space-time which introduces the gravity.

  • @thetruthexperiment
    @thetruthexperiment Před 11 měsíci

    Considering these extremely isolated and sensitive detectors haven’t been around for very long should be good enough to assume that these signals aren’t a huge fish every single time. I love that you said “routine black hole collisions.”

  • @troybradshaw8781
    @troybradshaw8781 Před 11 měsíci

    You get the same effect if something hits our gravity well too hard and fast. It can be mistaken because of the heat flash. I've always been interested in neutron stars. They are estimated to shrink until a thimble full would weigh as much as a aircraft carrier. 82,000 tons. It's mind blowing.

  • @chriscordray8572
    @chriscordray8572 Před 11 měsíci +2

    I always believe we started in a nova, not in condensed materials. A Super Nova explosion would create all the materials in milliseconds. Imagine 2 sun's collide.

  • @justaguy4real
    @justaguy4real Před 11 měsíci

    17:20 great that they selflessly work together for the greatest good now instead of trying to seriously compete for credit.

  • @XRP747E
    @XRP747E Před 11 měsíci

    That was a really stimulating video! Thank you - a year late.

  • @Aussie23456
    @Aussie23456 Před 11 měsíci

    Do the gravitational waves travell,at the speed of light186,000 miles per second. or how is the gravitational wave senced so quickly being at a large distance from that which senced the gravitational
    wave showing something of a simarity to earthly ,seismic waves ,showing the start and increase and fall of the magnitude of seismic waves
    as an earthquake signified a tearing in or under or over a fault within a tectonic plate

  • @anirudhadhote
    @anirudhadhote Před 11 měsíci

    Very good 👍🏼

  • @wknajafi
    @wknajafi Před 2 lety +1

    thank you

  • @matgeezer2094
    @matgeezer2094 Před 10 měsíci

    Really interesting video. Just wondered - how well can 3 gravitational wave detectors narrow down the search area? Also, does a kilonova send out a burst of neutrinos? Were an excess of neutrinos observed?

  • @AsteroSSB
    @AsteroSSB Před 11 měsíci

    This is now my favourite video to send to people that often ask me: Hey Badonk, how is it that we are made of stardust?

  • @MrJdsenior
    @MrJdsenior Před 11 měsíci +1

    That's amazing. The detection and publications, as well. I can't even get my head around things bending spacetime to send out waves detectable from HUMONGOUS distances. And I used to think Supernovae were spectacular.
    So from what you said, I'm assuming that gravitational lensing would not work on gravity waves the way it does on light? My other thought was, "And poof, there goes many theoretical physicists work, up in smoke in an instant". If so, ouch.

    • @manhandler
      @manhandler Před 11 měsíci

      Wouldn't gravitational waves cause lensing? And by extension time distortion would keep them moving forever while expanding. Truly amazing time we live in.

  • @alnilam2151
    @alnilam2151 Před 2 lety +3

    Were there many unknown\yet2be identified elements observed within said kilonovas' spectrum bandwidth? Or, is that even possible Paul unidentified observations or justanother sillyquestion? Thanks❣🔭👀

    • @MrJdsenior
      @MrJdsenior Před 11 měsíci

      Had the same thought. I don't know how you would even detect them, though, given that they might be stable for microseconds or nanoseconds.

    • @neilreynolds3858
      @neilreynolds3858 Před 11 měsíci

      That sounds like a very good question to me. If there is a zone of stability out beyond the mass number of what we know is stable, would we be able to detect it in a kilonova exposition?

  • @Shinobubu
    @Shinobubu Před 11 měsíci

    that 1.3 second delay is easily explained as small lag in our instrumentation and synchronization.

  • @infinitemonkey917
    @infinitemonkey917 Před 2 lety +1

    What happens after 2 neutron stars collide ? Do you have 1 big one or maybe a black hole ?

  • @BIG-DIPPER-56
    @BIG-DIPPER-56 Před 11 měsíci

    Very Good - Thank You ! ! !
    🙂😎👍

  • @shaqilleraneldojacobs1275

    This is 4real mind boggling 🤯

  • @Yabberfrat
    @Yabberfrat Před 11 měsíci

    I will look through the comments but you did mean to say that the gravity waves arrived first, correct? You twice said the gamma rays got there first but you also said that light was tangled up in escaping the explosion vs the gravity waves and that the gravity waves were able to "just sail on throug" unimpeded by the explosion.
    Or did you mean the gamma rays arrived first before the visible portion spectrum of the light?
    That part was kind of confusing..../

  • @wayneyadams
    @wayneyadams Před 11 měsíci +1

    13:58 What?! If the gravitational waves came straight out while the gamma rays were delayed, shouldn't the gamma ray have arrived AFTER the gravitational waves, not before?
    14:13 1.3 seconds in 140 million years would be well within experimental error. It is 2.9 parts in 10^15 (2,9 parts in a million billion, or 3 pennies in ten trillion dollars). I don't think there are any experiments ever done in the whole history of Physics and Chemistry that had that kind of precision.

  • @space_artist_4real138
    @space_artist_4real138 Před 11 měsíci +1

    If light can orbit a neutron star, doesn't that mean that to escape this orbit an object needs to exceed the speed of light? Meaning this is a black hole? Or could it be an elliptical orbit and it is possible to escape and there's something I'm not understanding?

  • @nektu5435
    @nektu5435 Před 2 lety +8

    Who cares about Lithium? Nirvana. Nirvana cares. I like it. I'm not gonna crack.

    • @dextermorgan1
      @dextermorgan1 Před 11 měsíci +1

      I know a few manic depressives who kind of depend on it too. 🤷🏻

    • @TwinPhoenix666
      @TwinPhoenix666 Před 11 měsíci

      Evanescence. Don't wanna forget how it feels without lithium.

    • @chiragpurohit3657
      @chiragpurohit3657 Před 11 měsíci

    • @daMillenialTrucker
      @daMillenialTrucker Před 11 měsíci

      I'm glad I depend on Jesus for my source of happiness

  • @seankelly1291
    @seankelly1291 Před 9 měsíci

    Ok. I'll apologize in advance. But I need you to clarify something, please. In your words, "the gamma ray radiation (the light/emr) got 'tangled up' in (the debri field of the explosion), in the gravity waves, and the gravitational waves "sailed right through." So how does that make the gravitational waves faster than the gamma waves?
    Thank you for clarifying. Love the video. Especially about how kilonovas are necessary for heavier elements.

  • @sirfer6969
    @sirfer6969 Před 9 měsíci

    5 min in, instant like and subscription

  • @Wise4HarvestTime
    @Wise4HarvestTime Před 11 měsíci

    Amazing 🤩

  • @stevoplex
    @stevoplex Před 11 měsíci

    Wow! I remember that, I awoke from fitful sleep that morning as if my brother slapped the top of my head with a warm, fairly dense pancake. Except there was no pancake. And my brother, a geophysicist was in Switzerland. I called him later, asking if he had been playing "spooky action at a distance " with me. Nope. So today, I found out what it may have been, though I had no clue beforehand. Science is cool.

  • @dichebach
    @dichebach Před 11 měsíci

    Kilonovae are considered a promising mechanism for explaining the apparent "over-abundance" of heavy elements in the universe, particularly those beyond iron. That much is absolutely true, and the observations of kilonova event in 2017 (GW170817) provided strong support for the role of kilonovae in the production of heavy elements. However, I don't quite follow the argument that proof that gravity waves travel at the speed of light has "effectively killed almost every extension to general relativity . . . all theories of modified gravity . . . cooked up to explain dark energy." Perhaps he was referring to other models, but as far as I know those observations that gravitational waves travel at the speed of light are generally consistent with extensions to general relativity that aim to provide alternative explanations for dark energy.
    Scalar field models, modified gravity theories, and the Chaplygin gas model, among others, are constructed in a way that preserves the fundamental principles of relativity, including the speed limit of causality set by the speed of light. These theories do not violate the observed speed of gravitational waves.

  • @nobiggeridiot
    @nobiggeridiot Před 2 lety +3

    Side question, is it possible to image a neutron star in visible optical spectrum ?

    • @chaz693
      @chaz693 Před 2 lety

      Yeah they have been observing pulsars for a really long time

  • @manhandler
    @manhandler Před 11 měsíci +1

    Wouldn't uranium be a heavier element than iron? And wouldn't a netron star be more likely to condense uranium than iron?

  • @mayerkorchin-vv9vt
    @mayerkorchin-vv9vt Před 11 měsíci

    I have never heard of this before.

  • @andrel8243
    @andrel8243 Před 2 lety +1

    Great

  • @BenjaminOwenSlattery
    @BenjaminOwenSlattery Před 11 měsíci +1

    Wow, kilanovas are a goldmine!

  • @i-love-space390
    @i-love-space390 Před 11 měsíci +4

    I always wondered how the heaviest elements beyond Iron on the PT were created. I figured it must have to do with some type of Nova. Thank you for this insightful video.
    I always laugh at people who ask what good our space program is. They are just people who never think about science. They were falling asleep in science class.
    At my age, I have witnessed so many things that were mysteries or theories when I was a student in school, be OBSERVED by spacecraft and space based telescopes.
    Also, the bean counters are always trying to starve funding for basic research, (because it doesn't have a purpose). This kind of serendipitous discovery is something that years ago could not have been predicted. It has taken decades of theorists and researchers to prepare us to observe this.
    And I always wondered if gravitational waves had to travel at the speed of light. Fascinating.

  • @DesereckC
    @DesereckC Před 11 měsíci

    It’s hilarious how people can talk about conspiracy theories with the same conviction and seriousness as this guy talking about literal facts of science.

  • @marknovak6498
    @marknovak6498 Před měsícem

    Good Commentary. My only question is perhaps the far more massive population-three stars might still need to be studied as a source.

  • @seankelly1291
    @seankelly1291 Před 9 měsíci

    140million years ago!!!!!!! That distance is mind blowing.

  • @pittyman
    @pittyman Před 11 měsíci

    We are now waiting for observing by one of these & meganova, giganova and teranova...😎

  • @nathanielacton3768
    @nathanielacton3768 Před 11 měsíci

    What boggles my mind about relying on events like Kilanova to make 'mundane' stable metals like gold\silver\etc on earth is that we know that it didn't land here late, it was scattered around in the formative solar system epoch. Now, 13.7b - 4.5b gives the universe only 9.2b years for generations of stellar objects to be formed, collapsed, die and explode to get the variety of stars we see today. Most main sequence stars we can see have a lifespan longer than the universes current age excluding them from the recycling process that produces heavy elements.
    This implies that things like kilanova, which are now considered super rare would had to have been extremely common earlier in the universe, else the clouds of heavy element slurry that forms all the observable star system we see today would not have captured anything other than basic H from the BB.
    The early universe had to have been like popping candy. Main sequence stars were either excluded from formation, eaten based on tight packing, or would have been bombarded constantly with a slurry of heavies, which should be detectable today...

  • @aforementioned7177
    @aforementioned7177 Před 10 měsíci

    3 questions though. Where is the BH or Neutron Star that's left over from the Kilonova that created the stuff our solar system is made of? Should it not be relatively close to us, a few light years away? Can we detect it in some way?

  • @richardsykes9692
    @richardsykes9692 Před 11 měsíci +1

    I was under the impression that even in merging galaxies the vast distance between stars means none will ever collide with another. So how do the two neutron stars come to be close enough to collide? (they’re only a few kilometres in diameter and light years distant)

    • @manw3bttcks
      @manw3bttcks Před 11 měsíci +3

      Many stars are in binary systems where the stars formed together in orbit. If they both die and become neutron stars they will eventually spiral together and collide

    • @wayneyadams
      @wayneyadams Před 11 měsíci +1

      @@manw3bttcks Exactly right. In fact, you can replace "many" with "most."

    • @manhandler
      @manhandler Před 11 měsíci

      That's one possibility, but some stars and black hole wander through galaxies at incredible speeds and their own gravity is so great it pulls other star toward them, 2 neutron stars would draw each other closer faster and faster as they got closer, this would take millions of years and massive gravity wells. As our milky ways center (blackhole) eventually every star planet etc.. will end up there.

  • @davidchurch3472
    @davidchurch3472 Před 11 měsíci

    What radioactive elements were left in the kilonova you collected, after all the atoms had been squished until ALL their protons and electrons became neutrons?

  • @Zithorius
    @Zithorius Před 11 měsíci

    If the Gamma Rays still arrived first when they were bouncing around and getting tangled up in the matter from the collision, doesn't that mean that grav waves do in fact NOT travel at the speed of light even if they lag behind just barely (and only detecably if there's a length of space to build the separtion of hundreds of millions of lightyears)? I even did the math, the gravity moved at 0.999999999999999999999999017826964744152568383 plus like 90 decimal spots times the speed of light which is hella close but still behind the speed the gamma rays traveled. Since gravity deals with space itself, my assumption would be that if it affects causality at lightspeed, then the gamma rays were 'surfing' on the grav waves, an extreme condition that allows for light to move slightly faster than 299792458 meters per second or that space and gravity cannot keep up with light, I would certainly not settle on a 1.3 second difference over 140 million years as 'the same'. I mean I get 5+ sigma but in this case specifically, I'd settle for no less than a proper explanation for the discrepancy even if it means 'back to the drawing board'.

  • @ChelimYrneh
    @ChelimYrneh Před 11 měsíci

    Interesting ! But you inverted the arrival times of gamma-rays & ‘gravitational waves’ ~ you said the light ( I.e. gamma-rays ) got “tangled up” momentarily with matter on it’s way out, hence slightly delayed, whilst ‘gravitational waves’ were not affected by such delaying interactions - yet your premise is that the gamma-rays arrived FIRST !!