This is great. But we have a quadtrac that has so much hp in a narrow foot print. In fact it is quite a bit narrower than our magnum mfwd's...when you factor buying the rims...which no one talks about...it's still cheaper tha n replacing tracks...but it's less performance in the real places a quadtrac machine shines. When we will replace our mfwd tires. We will look into this...but we won't be replacing tracks with tires.
We are looking into buying a new Steiger 550 and are thinking of going the LSW tires, instead of normal dual tires, just wondering if the traction is a lot better in sandy soils? I’m from Australia and we have a lot of sand hills and getting over them with dual tires can be hard.
depth was the same, we worked 2hrs to match everything up. Slip, track machine was less all the time, GPH seemed close, on road wheel much less, and honestly in the field wheel was always a little less. Exciting times.
This is great. But we have a quadtrac that has so much hp in a narrow foot print. In fact it is quite a bit narrower than our magnum mfwd's...when you factor buying the rims...which no one talks about...it's still cheaper tha n replacing tracks...but it's less performance in the real places a quadtrac machine shines. When we will replace our mfwd tires. We will look into this...but we won't be replacing tracks with tires.
We are looking into buying a new Steiger 550 and are thinking of going the LSW tires, instead of normal dual tires, just wondering if the traction is a lot better in sandy soils? I’m from Australia and we have a lot of sand hills and getting over them with dual tires can be hard.
What were the overall results?...gph ?..slip??..what depth was implement set??..thx
depth was the same, we worked 2hrs to match everything up. Slip, track machine was less all the time, GPH seemed close, on road wheel much less, and honestly in the field wheel was always a little less. Exciting times.
Troppo ingombrante con quelle gomme li! Lo preferisco con il cingolo il Quadtrac.