The Total Absolute Everything Size Comparison (TTAESC) Part II (PII)

you guys are SO IMPATIENT
Music: TheFatRat - Origin
ParagonX9 - Chaoz Airflow
86 objects in this part
204 objects in all parts
Length of playlist: 11 min 4 sec

[@iamCWA1]

Ah yes, the 2nd part.

[@14xpm14]

I MISSED IT BECAUSE OF AWARDS FOR MATH NOOOOOO

[@Saturn_Mapping]

Definitely you must use BAT4423 sizes for everything (NOT all)

[@iamCWA1]

You just disagreed with your own words

[@SpaceImplorerExplorerImplorer]

@Saturn_Mapping That is self-contradictory. Also, BAT4423 isn’t a reliable source.

[@iamCWA1]

Agreed

[@14xpm14]

THIS IS GONNA BE SO GAMER

[@iamCWA1]

what

[@14xpm14]

@@iamCWA1game or

[@iamCWA1]

@@14xpm14actually come in the live chat this time

[@iamCWA1]

THE THUMBNAIL IS WRONG NOOO

[@SpaceImplorerExplorerImplorer]

What is the source for the sizes of atoms?

[@iamCWA1]

I forgot to link it, but it was a PDF periodic table, might not be reliable

[@iamCWA1]

As far as I know, it used the Culver atomic model

[@SpaceImplorerExplorerImplorer]

@@iamCWA1 It is best to use radii based on ionisation energies

[@idkwhattowrite31]

C’mon man

[@iamCWA1]

im not really that active on weekdays so a.y.k.m

[@jeffchehovits1385]

No negative comments or you will meet GUJ!

[@iamCWA1]

what