I didn’t even realize why him moving the Bishop to B5 made her concede until is saw the freaking pawn on A4, when I noticed, I just went “god dang… that’s evil… this guy isn’t the best in the world for nothing…”
Isent d4 the second most common opening move in chess. e4 is the most common opening move in chess, that I use a lot more, than I use d4 as opening move in chess.
d5 as an opening move by White was a great play by Magnus. Judit was immediately out of book at that point. Black is never prepared for that move because it's _incredibly_ rare
@@haziqsaharudin4583 I guess you did not get the point. Of course I realize that it was the sarcasm. But do YOU realize that it is exactly what the author wanted? You guys basically are manipulated to leave sarcastic comments like this one to promote this channel in CZcams engines. A cheap trick and so many people here fall for it.
0:26 "His chess reputation was going to be ruined forever" what a ridiculous statement, Judit hasn't won any classical games against Magnus, but to suggest that she is so bad it would forever ruin Magnus' reputation is an incredibly disrespectful thing to say, Judit has beaten Magnus in 19 moves in the past.
I never said anything about Judit being a woman, also you must be incredibly new to chess if you seriously believe that anyone would judge a top player for losing to another GM lol
@VeryLogicalGuy Gukesh is a very skilled player in his own right, not sure what your point is. Of course she's not on Magnus's level -- the only person you could compare him to is Kasparov -- but that doesn't mean losing to Polgar would ruin his reputation. This video is just garbage, gets everything wrong from Judit's given name to the literal first two moves of the game (the guy called d4 Nf6 the King's Indian, lmao).
@VeryLogicalGuy I didn't bring it up, but I think you're misunderstanding a couple of things here. First of all, ratings in the Elo system are relative rather than absolute -- you can't compare Elo across eras. I would not say Radjabov, Karjakin, or Giri have ever been stronger than peak Fischer or Karpov, and I'd hope you agree with me. Judit peaked at #8 in the world. Second, nobody's trying to prove that Polgar is better than or equal to Carlsen in skill. The couple of blitz games Judit has won against Magnus do however show that she can at least compete with Magnus at a super GM level, even past her prime. A loss to her isn't threatening Magnus's reputation.
@VeryLogicalGuy bro definitely hates women. She peaked at #8 worldwide before Magnus was even a GM. She was one of only like 15 Super Grandmasters that year. She has beat Magnus in official rapid games twice. So she’s not the greatest chess player of all time, but she’s top 100 of all time at least.
@VeryLogicalGuy if she is not considered a chess legend to you then your standards are too high. I’m gonna name some players and I’m going need to need which of them you consider legends. Caruana, David Bronstein, and Boris Spassky.
Magnus won the 2014 World Blitz Championship in Dubai with 17/21, and Judit Polgar finished with 13/21, still in the top 32/113 entrants. They met in the 14th round of 21 rounds, and the game was timed to 3 minutes each. The video is a bit misleading at times. It's not Classical Chess, in case you were maybe wondering why they looked so rushed, and she wasn't the last person he played to claim the title.
@@rpsquared82 czcams.com/video/hvbZCRid5CY/video.html or, most recently, she would have smoked him in just a few moves if they were playing Blitz in a park. Do not underestimate Judit Polgar! She's long retired, but still a phenomenal player. She was the number 1 female chess player in the world for 25 years.
0:25 "One wrong move and his chess reputation was going to be ruined forever" Wut? Losing to someone with 2700+ rating would ruin his reputation? Judith Polgar even beat Garry Kasparov.
@@massivecowbreakout7555 I can’t tell if your comment is sarcastic or not so I apologize if it is, and I just ruined the joke. But women can indeed be just as good as men at chess or better than, except at the absolute top level, where on average men do seem to have a statistically significant advantage, if I had to guess it’s probably just cause of how brains are wired, but eventually there will be some brave lesbian who becomes the world‘s number one, because lesbians have brains that look more like a dudes brain.
@allthenewsordeath5772 It can't be a coincidence that the top female player is 53rd in the world. There's got to be some weird deep pattern recognition in men's brains that make their skill ceiling higher than women's. Perhaps evolved for hunting back in the stone age, who knows. I would personally like to see a woman get to at least the top 10, but I'm not sure if it's possible
The comments here have basically no substance, and this video seems to use the title for clickbait, with subpar commentary to exaggerate things. So I guess I’ll cover the important details. 0:25 A GM losing to a mistake does not ruin their reputation, even if they happen to be a world champion 0:31 Not D5, but ok 0:35 Usually called the King’s Indian/Indian game but close enough 1:06 Doesn’t really break opening principles, the knight is being developed, with the option to go to an outpost on b4 or chill on c7, this move justifies the pawn to c6 move, and is overall a solid move 1:16 Queen to c7, not c6 1:20 This is a bland comment likely generated from looking at an eval bar and pretending to understand a position, but I won’t judge, the position is essentially equal with white having a space advantage Now for the more important details 1:33 It seems like much now. (jokes aside, pawn h5 to h4 can be played whenever black wants to, and it is played immediately) 1:38 Queen d2 does create a battery, but that battery is likely not the important part of the move, Queen d2 makes space for the f rook, and that f rook can now move to make space for the king, and that means that Magnus’s king has an escape planned in the event of a serious attack 1:47 The point of this move is likely to improve the attack on the kingside, not trade pieces 2:03 Taking the knight with a pawn does not win the bishop, the bishop can go to e1. However, that would result in the bishop not having any space and blocking the rook. This blocked rook blocks the king from escaping, making it harder for the king to escape, and black can then move her queen to d8 or e7, with the idea of moving the Queen to h4, threatening mate, and the only way to defend mate is to sacrifice the bishop on e1. In other words, black has enough compensation for the knight sacrifice. 2:14 This is unrelated to the commentary, I think this is where Judith’s key mistake was made, since Judith didn’t take the d8-h4 diagonal with her queen, and also likely why Magnus took the knight in this position, since he can control that diagonal with his own queen. The pawn being on c5 also blocks Judith’s Queen from being able to access Magnus’s king through the a7-g1 diagonal, preventing a helpful fork and defensive resource, which means she blundered her pawn here, since she’ll lose it with no real compensation. Magnus probably took the knight because he noticed these details. Keep in mind that this is my opinion. 2:19 King can’t get off the back rank, Queen is chilling and even goes to g5 on the next move 2:45 Also prevents the bishop infiltration to e3 3:21 This is a mistake, one of the few things the commentary covered well, sadly over exaggerating things in the process. 3:58 Magnus’s pawns on the light squares make the bishop almost useless since it has no place to really go to. An inactive bishop is traded for a good knight, but black is still losing of course. 4:45 The b rook has no squares to go to and can at best be traded away for a bishop, which is losing. If the rook stays there, knight to c4 picks off the rook, also losing for black. I’m glad this is over, I regret writing this.
Well thanks, I feel like the commentator just exaggerated and kinda undermined her in the process. She's a good player but he won't have his reputation ruined because "lost to lower rank and woman". But thanks for the summary I was kinda lost in the video to be honest
Just a typical CZcamsr who just talks over shit and exaggerating things other people do because they have no worthwhile skills themselves. Everything is for views. No surprises there. Very few of these types of channels are worth a damn where the person has some integrity by not reducing what they're covering to clickbait.
Yeah the comment about the knight with the mocking tone really made me tick. This guy doesn't know 10% of what Judith Polgar knows and allows himself to talk like this about her.
Don't be confused with the different ELO ratings U see on the internet. On FIDE rating 2750 is Top10 in the world even nowadays. Magnus has the highest and its 2853 (the only one this moment above 2800). Hikaru has 2775, Anish Giri 2768, Aronian 2745. The best woman has 2628. Btw. neither of them was on peak in 2014. Judith was far away from that.
This is amazing and enjoyable stuff to watch! Such technical skill for both. I've not played Magnus, yet. I best start learning how the pieces move on the board; probably my best first step.
Both great players and it was in the balance for some time, the thing with blitz though is that it's very easy to play one move that isn't great and the whole game can come crushing down, Magnus slowly but surely turned the game in his favour and found some brilliant ideas to finish it off.
She calculated the loss just instantly, you'd think in a tournament might just have a second look see if we missed something but no.. just instantly knows .. good video mate with the intro and music, commentary timing make a chess match exciting
No shame in losing to the goat. Surprised she trapped her rook in the end but it was long over by then anyway. In her prime she was a brilliant, aggressive player, but magnus is just on another level.
Magnus has an extraordinary talent to play d5 in the opening.. I think this is Queen Pawn very modern opening.. d4 is lost for Magnus and so he played d5 thats why he won
Love your videos! I actually felt pretty sad when I saw that your first video was off the channel. That was a masterpiece just like all the others. Keep it going!
Why would his reputation be “ruined forever?” A single loss won’t change his status as one of the greats, and even if he did lose, like you said, she’s a very strong player. I’d cut the overly dramatic language in future videos
@@dand3953 isn’t that term described for left wing people with moderate progressive views, so the government and media came up with the word to keep the right ignorant and ignore said progressive ideas. So why would people that think being beat by a woman would be the wokesters if that’s a clear right wing view? At least you proved my point that only dumbasses use words like woke 🤦♂️🤡
Plenty of people could/would latch onto it and it would tarnish his reputation; but it would not tarnish how he presents himself. It has nothing to do with him and everything to do with how the world perceives and treats people. That said the high tier chess community would just see it as a praiseworthy win by Polgar rather than a humiliation of Carlsen. It would be podcasters who don't even care about chess who make a big deal about it.
2:04 She would not win the bishop because Magnus could still move it backwards. Also, even if his bishop was trapped, he would have won the trade by one pawn
This commentator has no clue what he's talking about. "Nf6, the Kings Indian Defense". I mean, it could to the KID, but Nf6 is just a flexible opening move
Knight to a6 actually doesn't go against ALL chess principles. IMO, one of the principles in chess is not to mistake these principles as necessary developments, but rather as a helping hand to understand how to use your pieces. There are certainly situations in place where principles don't apply anymore, because of the situation.
totally agree and what you pointed out is one of like 20 really exaggerated or just straight up wrong statements made by the video uploader who also apparently can't be bothered to learn the names of openings, get the pieces and squares correct, or calculate any variations. i think for anyone who is beyond beginner level, it's immediately apparent how bad and lazy this commentary is.
Beside the common opening move 1. d5 the first move by Polgar (1. ... Nf6) is NOT necessarily King's Indian. We also can get Nimzo-Indian or Queen's Indian for example. In addition Na6 from Polgar is a very common move in the KID. Why so surprised?
Whoever did the commentary is an idiot and probably not even a chess player that's why. He knew if he made a video about Magnus he would get views and that's about it. Bssically clickbait
Idk man based on this game I'd bet it's closer to 2-7-1 with the 7 being their chance of drawing. Maybe 3-6-1 or 3-5-2; but either way I think they are closer to even than not. Even if it's just a 5% difference.
@@fuckyoutube4398 What does a 150 rating difference even mean at that level? I randomly beat people hundreds of points higher, or lose to much lower... and for me that's a huge % difference. For them that's like a 5% difference. Plenty of room for their unique "personalities" to manifest --- by that I mean, everyone has certain positions they know better than others. Not everyone can be the best at all possible positions. There are likely unique situations where her playing style might give her the advantage.
She pronounced it "Judith" in a video for chess24 when she defeated Magnus in a Blitz game last year at a park in Spain. You can hear it for yourself: czcams.com/video/hvbZCRid5CY/video.html
It's not a surprise that Magnus at his peak crashed an old Judith. What surprised me the most is that she did not know of this trap of the rook. It happens a lot in rook endgames. Even Ra6 was a mistake because it gives the tempo to white. Also she did not see the entrapment of the knight? Really? This is something that any 1000 Elo player knows. I can only assume that she does not play endgames very well, which is really strange for a top ranking player.
To be fair Peak Magnus is beating anyone, even peak Judith🤷🏾♂️ and as far as I know, she has won against him, in blitz but never in a classic game. But I did expect more during this game😂
@@bello808I'd love to see a classical game of Peak Judie and Peak Magnus. Judit was an absolute viper, would make for an interesting match (Magnus would likely win, but Just would fare better than most)
I swear to god if ludwig makes this entire channel's legacy into 1 ten minute video and doesn't make any more videos on here because it was "a social experiment" imma be mad bcs I just wanted more videos on online lore then it stopped. Very sadge
Judit(udit) has beat him and 11 other World champions. She's super aggressive and made world champions literally cry and cheat when she was a teenager. Herself and Tal are my favorite style of play. They don't rely on theroy as much as they create with forced aggression
You may not appreciate this but domination is much more important to a healthy male psyche than a healthy female psyche. Chess is ultimately a metaphor for war. If women can wage war on par with men, then what's the point of being a man? Why not let women fend for themselves? Suddenly society breaks apart and it's the year 20XX.
@@abominationdesolation8322 I think you missed what I said. “His chess reputation ruined FOREVER.” Forever is a really long time, never mind the fact he is arguably the greatest chess player of all time. And who knew the only point in being a male is being able to wage war better than women? Hell, Dylan Mulvaney just won “woman of the year.” Looks like men are even better at being women than women.
@@abominationdesolation8322women can't wage war on par with man in chess. Not when people like Magnis exist. That would be very delusional 😂😂. Judith is good, I can't lie, but she just can't compare to Magnus. Even in her prime. They're not on par at all. Even after beating him at 2rapid blitz games, he's won 11. And she's lost every classical chess game they've played together 🤷🏾♂️
@@abominationdesolation8322 You're addressing things that have nothing to do with what I said. You're talking about what's "the point of being a man" if you can't wage war as well as a woman (as if there haven't been hundreds of millions of men who haven't been in war) while I'm talking about the fallacious thinking in the video. What's the next sexist comment? - what's the point of being a woman if you can't cook as well as a man? How does one grand master losing to another (female or male) DESTROY FOREVER the reputation of arguably the greatest chess player ever? Had he lost the game are we really to think Magnus' career would have been forever damaged? The whole premise is nonsense.
*_"defeated 11 distinc world champs"_* A *_misleading_* statement. She did not "defeat 11 distinct world champs", she happened to win in some opportunity against them. Kasparov defeated her 12 times. She barely won only 1 game against him. Do you call THAT "defeat" a world champ?? Please. Be real All in all, truth remains: she never became World champion against male players, so... calm down
@@deleatur absolutely. Winning a game against a world champion is a phenomenal accomplishment. Winning a game against 11 is incredible (I have no clue if that number is actually true). No doubt she has a losing record against them over all their games, but she is still an incredible talent. I think some people are sticking up for her because the video acts like Magnus’ reputation would be ruined “forever” if he lost to a woman, which is pretty shitty to say.
@@cock5268 She lost horribly and only won some matches, being a super GM, winning against other super GMs is a good acomplishment, but it is incomparable to the terrible loses she suffered.
@@vietta6424 Dude, Magnus defeated Karpov and played then-reigning world champion Kasparov to a draw at his first chess tournament at 13. Karpov was impressed with young Magnus playing at that level at that age while Kasparov simply shook Magnus' hand and left rather quickly.
“Magnus plays d5, a standard opening move”
My man, thats d4
Magnus is superhuman
Ikr
he gave her the D
If your good enough in chess. You can start the game with d5, while playing with white pieces.
I was wondering
The way he traps pieces rather than trying to take them is amazing to watch. I learned a lot from this game
I didn’t even realize why him moving the Bishop to B5 made her concede until is saw the freaking pawn on A4, when I noticed, I just went “god dang… that’s evil… this guy isn’t the best in the world for nothing…”
if you’ve rendered a piece useless, you need not waste a tempo capturing it
Yep. You could become the next world chess champion.
As Levy "GothamChess" Rozman described him, Magnus' play style is "suffocating" like an anaconda.
He baited the rook knowing he could trap the knight
I did not know that Magnus could play D5 to start the opening, bro really has superpowers
fr
Magnus is THE law, he can Everything🗿
Lol
She saw a checkmate in 34 moves
STUNNED
I love how the thumbnail says "stunned" after he just started the game with the most common opening ever 💀
She saw checkmate in 63
I would aslo be shocked if I saw pawn move 3 squares
@@SugarCubic709 you mean 69 ?
Isent d4 the second most common opening move in chess. e4 is the most common opening move in chess, that I use a lot more, than I use d4 as opening move in chess.
@@jout738 I wrote this before watching the video and I didn't correct it, I know that I just assumed from the thumbnail it's the king pawn
D5 is a very aggressive first move
Nope, d4 is more positional, e4 generally tends to be more aggressive but there are exceptions, but generally d4 is more passive than e4.
@@fandbwelch3768The joke is moving the pawn three squares would be more aggressive.
@@fandbwelch3768 bro don't understand the joke😢
@@fandbwelch3768 bro thought he meant d4 😭
@@fandbwelch3768 bro is so eager to give advice that he doesn't have room for irony
I'd be stunned too if White opened with d5 😂
Magnus playing 5D chess here, not the move!
After becoming the worlds best chess player he gained the ability to move pawns 3 squares forward😮😮
the pawn got them new shoes
Guys, it's like the matrix. The only reason you can't open with D5 is because you still believe you can't. Magnus believes.
*The prophecy is t r u e*
he is the one!!
d5 as an opening move by White was a great play by Magnus.
Judit was immediately out of book at that point. Black is never prepared for that move because it's _incredibly_ rare
You DO realize that this casters' "mistake" was intentional, right?
@@blacktigershearthstoneadve6905 blud does not realize the sarcasm 🤣
@@haziqsaharudin4583 I guess you did not get the point. Of course I realize that it was the sarcasm. But do YOU realize that it is exactly what the author wanted? You guys basically are manipulated to leave sarcastic comments like this one to promote this channel in CZcams engines. A cheap trick and so many people here fall for it.
Blud every kid knows that, we want to comment so we want it doesnt matter if it was intentional or not@@blacktigershearthstoneadve6905
@@blacktigershearthstoneadve6905 intentional to provoke more comments?
0:26 "His chess reputation was going to be ruined forever" what a ridiculous statement, Judit hasn't won any classical games against Magnus, but to suggest that she is so bad it would forever ruin Magnus' reputation is an incredibly disrespectful thing to say, Judit has beaten Magnus in 19 moves in the past.
I never said anything about Judit being a woman, also you must be incredibly new to chess if you seriously believe that anyone would judge a top player for losing to another GM lol
@VeryLogicalGuy Gukesh is a very skilled player in his own right, not sure what your point is. Of course she's not on Magnus's level -- the only person you could compare him to is Kasparov -- but that doesn't mean losing to Polgar would ruin his reputation. This video is just garbage, gets everything wrong from Judit's given name to the literal first two moves of the game (the guy called d4 Nf6 the King's Indian, lmao).
@VeryLogicalGuy I didn't bring it up, but I think you're misunderstanding a couple of things here. First of all, ratings in the Elo system are relative rather than absolute -- you can't compare Elo across eras. I would not say Radjabov, Karjakin, or Giri have ever been stronger than peak Fischer or Karpov, and I'd hope you agree with me. Judit peaked at #8 in the world.
Second, nobody's trying to prove that Polgar is better than or equal to Carlsen in skill. The couple of blitz games Judit has won against Magnus do however show that she can at least compete with Magnus at a super GM level, even past her prime. A loss to her isn't threatening Magnus's reputation.
@VeryLogicalGuy bro definitely hates women. She peaked at #8 worldwide before Magnus was even a GM. She was one of only like 15 Super Grandmasters that year. She has beat Magnus in official rapid games twice. So she’s not the greatest chess player of all time, but she’s top 100 of all time at least.
@VeryLogicalGuy if she is not considered a chess legend to you then your standards are too high. I’m gonna name some players and I’m going need to need which of them you consider legends. Caruana, David Bronstein, and Boris Spassky.
Magnus won the 2014 World Blitz Championship in Dubai with 17/21, and Judit Polgar finished with 13/21, still in the top 32/113 entrants. They met in the 14th round of 21 rounds, and the game was timed to 3 minutes each. The video is a bit misleading at times. It's not Classical Chess, in case you were maybe wondering why they looked so rushed, and she wasn't the last person he played to claim the title.
Great comment. Thanks.
He would've smoked her faster if classical.
@@rpsquared82 czcams.com/video/hvbZCRid5CY/video.html or, most recently, she would have smoked him in just a few moves if they were playing Blitz in a park. Do not underestimate Judit Polgar! She's long retired, but still a phenomenal player. She was the number 1 female chess player in the world for 25 years.
@@uselesscrappyvideos lolololololol
That was a good one.
@@uselesscrappyvideos Bruh this guy is living under a rock by saying Magnus would get smoked easily just like that.
I love Judith Polgar. She always plays aggressive, never a dull game from her
0:25 "One wrong move and his chess reputation was going to be ruined forever"
Wut? Losing to someone with 2700+ rating would ruin his reputation? Judith Polgar even beat Garry Kasparov.
After losing 20+ times
@@therealshadow88117-1 with 2 draws. AT 13
It would give hope to the idea that women could be as good at chess as men
@@massivecowbreakout7555
I can’t tell if your comment is sarcastic or not so I apologize if it is, and I just ruined the joke. But women can indeed be just as good as men at chess or better than, except at the absolute top level, where on average men do seem to have a statistically significant advantage, if I had to guess it’s probably just cause of how brains are wired, but eventually there will be some brave lesbian who becomes the world‘s number one, because lesbians have brains that look more like a dudes brain.
@allthenewsordeath5772 It can't be a coincidence that the top female player is 53rd in the world. There's got to be some weird deep pattern recognition in men's brains that make their skill ceiling higher than women's. Perhaps evolved for hunting back in the stone age, who knows. I would personally like to see a woman get to at least the top 10, but I'm not sure if it's possible
The comments here have basically no substance, and this video seems to use the title for clickbait, with subpar commentary to exaggerate things. So I guess I’ll cover the important details.
0:25 A GM losing to a mistake does not ruin their reputation, even if they happen to be a world champion
0:31 Not D5, but ok
0:35 Usually called the King’s Indian/Indian game but close enough
1:06 Doesn’t really break opening principles, the knight is being developed, with the option to go to an outpost on b4 or chill on c7, this move justifies the pawn to c6 move, and is overall a solid move
1:16 Queen to c7, not c6
1:20 This is a bland comment likely generated from looking at an eval bar and pretending to understand a position, but I won’t judge, the position is essentially equal with white having a space advantage
Now for the more important details
1:33 It seems like much now. (jokes aside, pawn h5 to h4 can be played whenever black wants to, and it is played immediately)
1:38 Queen d2 does create a battery, but that battery is likely not the important part of the move, Queen d2 makes space for the f rook, and that f rook can now move to make space for the king, and that means that Magnus’s king has an escape planned in the event of a serious attack
1:47 The point of this move is likely to improve the attack on the kingside, not trade pieces
2:03 Taking the knight with a pawn does not win the bishop, the bishop can go to e1. However, that would result in the bishop not having any space and blocking the rook. This blocked rook blocks the king from escaping, making it harder for the king to escape, and black can then move her queen to d8 or e7, with the idea of moving the Queen to h4, threatening mate, and the only way to defend mate is to sacrifice the bishop on e1. In other words, black has enough compensation for the knight sacrifice.
2:14 This is unrelated to the commentary, I think this is where Judith’s key mistake was made, since Judith didn’t take the d8-h4 diagonal with her queen, and also likely why Magnus took the knight in this position, since he can control that diagonal with his own queen. The pawn being on c5 also blocks Judith’s Queen from being able to access Magnus’s king through the a7-g1 diagonal, preventing a helpful fork and defensive resource, which means she blundered her pawn here, since she’ll lose it with no real compensation. Magnus probably took the knight because he noticed these details. Keep in mind that this is my opinion.
2:19 King can’t get off the back rank, Queen is chilling and even goes to g5 on the next move
2:45 Also prevents the bishop infiltration to e3
3:21 This is a mistake, one of the few things the commentary covered well, sadly over exaggerating things in the process.
3:58 Magnus’s pawns on the light squares make the bishop almost useless since it has no place to really go to. An inactive bishop is traded for a good knight, but black is still losing of course.
4:45 The b rook has no squares to go to and can at best be traded away for a bishop, which is losing. If the rook stays there, knight to c4 picks off the rook, also losing for black.
I’m glad this is over, I regret writing this.
Well thanks, I feel like the commentator just exaggerated and kinda undermined her in the process. She's a good player but he won't have his reputation ruined because "lost to lower rank and woman". But thanks for the summary I was kinda lost in the video to be honest
Thank you for this. Now I'm going back to Chessbase India for some proper, insightful commentary instead of this overhyped bullshit.
@@hikerieger6319 dont know why you said woman
Just a typical CZcamsr who just talks over shit and exaggerating things other people do because they have no worthwhile skills themselves.
Everything is for views. No surprises there. Very few of these types of channels are worth a damn where the person has some integrity by not reducing what they're covering to clickbait.
Yeah the comment about the knight with the mocking tone really made me tick. This guy doesn't know 10% of what Judith Polgar knows and allows himself to talk like this about her.
Am I missing something? Magnus defeats 2750 elo is pretty normal news, no? She did really well I thought
Normal indeed but shes women best chess player so ig that something different lol
Don't be confused with the different ELO ratings U see on the internet. On FIDE rating 2750 is Top10 in the world even nowadays. Magnus has the highest and its 2853 (the only one this moment above 2800). Hikaru has 2775, Anish Giri 2768, Aronian 2745. The best woman has 2628. Btw. neither of them was on peak in 2014. Judith was far away from that.
@100willsame1 oh so it's a different site rating, that makes a lot more sense.
@@aguyinahoodie890 Its the FIDE, the International Chess Federation's ELO rating since 1970. Way before internet.
@@aguyinahoodie890 that's not a "different site" it's literally the world chess federation
D5 is the best and most powerful starting move and a recently found move, Magnus already knows this move. wow
bro really opened with d5. manski got dem superpowers
All I have to say is meow.
L women
@@tsaanderson7385 classic women☕️ moment
@@tsaanderson7385 ???
@@watch.449 ??
Me, playing d4*
Magnus: "Ay, caramba. This is checkmate".
Yes, a regular checkmate in 274 moves, my friend
This is amazing and enjoyable stuff to watch! Such technical skill for both. I've not played Magnus, yet. I best start learning how the pieces move on the board; probably my best first step.
Yeah, just never play D5 as your opening whit white as the narrator suggested.
😂😂😂
What do you mean yet?
@@randomchaos9359 he was making a joke😂
Both great players and it was in the balance for some time, the thing with blitz though is that it's very easy to play one move that isn't great and the whole game can come crushing down, Magnus slowly but surely turned the game in his favour and found some brilliant ideas to finish it off.
Congrats on the channel growth @ClassicalMate awesome editing and sound design.
Loss to Judit polgar will ruin Magnus' reputation?
Judith has defeated multiple former World Champions and Magnus has lost to much weaker players.
R u the average women who gets offended by everything?
@@Jaasiah average incel
@@randomsnow6510 LOGIC = INCEL
@@quasar8744 How is this logical?
@@randomsnow6510 stop projecting
"Magnus knew it wouldn't be easy"
You sure about that?
memekak
He beats her 9 times out of 10.
She calculated the loss just instantly, you'd think in a tournament might just have a second look see if we missed something but no.. just instantly knows .. good video mate with the intro and music, commentary timing make a chess match exciting
No shame in losing to the goat. Surprised she trapped her rook in the end but it was long over by then anyway. In her prime she was a brilliant, aggressive player, but magnus is just on another level.
You don’t earn a reputation of ‘being able to pull water from stone’ for nothing.
Yeahhhh
I saw a comment saying that she would beat him in her prime😂😂
I just laughed it off but that's a bold ass statement
She has beaten him
What a explaing good commentary finally i able to understand the moves 😂
magnus: plays his first move
thumbnail: stunned 😱😱😱
Magnus has an extraordinary talent to play d5 in the opening.. I think this is Queen Pawn very modern opening.. d4 is lost for Magnus and so he played d5 thats why he won
d5 has been used in openings since the beginning of time.
Magnus: Plays first move in the game Judith Polgar:*stunned*
Love your videos! I actually felt pretty sad when I saw that your first video was off the channel. That was a masterpiece just like all the others. Keep it going!
Didn’t know pawns couldn’t go 3 squares. Thanks for the tip
you mean the pawnlock tip thingy? im not a pawn main so i randomly "place" my pawns with either en passant if any and many isolated pawn islands
That bishop move at the end was so smart, I thought he'd push the knight.
Why would his reputation be “ruined forever?” A single loss won’t change his status as one of the greats, and even if he did lose, like you said, she’s a very strong player. I’d cut the overly dramatic language in future videos
Hey, we gotta' let the Wokesters trash-talk a little bit.
@@dand3953 isn’t that term described for left wing people with moderate progressive views, so the government and media came up with the word to keep the right ignorant and ignore said progressive ideas. So why would people that think being beat by a woman would be the wokesters if that’s a clear right wing view? At least you proved my point that only dumbasses use words like woke 🤦♂️🤡
Plenty of people could/would latch onto it and it would tarnish his reputation; but it would not tarnish how he presents himself. It has nothing to do with him and everything to do with how the world perceives and treats people. That said the high tier chess community would just see it as a praiseworthy win by Polgar rather than a humiliation of Carlsen. It would be podcasters who don't even care about chess who make a big deal about it.
Absolutely easy work for magnus. Not even close.
2:04 She would not win the bishop because Magnus could still move it backwards. Also, even if his bishop was trapped, he would have won the trade by one pawn
I think going back is such a bad move that it wasn't even considered an option. It traps the Rook and the Bishop itself rendering both useless.
if moving bishop back, then mate is coming in just a few moves, because here is no way to unclog pieces and run away king in time.
magnus plays D5, a "standard opening move."
And that's why he is the champion. He just makes his own rules.
This commentator has no clue what he's talking about. "Nf6, the Kings Indian Defense". I mean, it could to the KID, but Nf6 is just a flexible opening move
thumbnail: (magnus puts pawn on d4 on first move)
also the thumbnail: *stunned*
"Magnus plays d5"
As Ben Finegold told once: He's a world champion he can move to i9 if he wants to.
Who gave bro permission to move to d5 💀
Knight to a6 actually doesn't go against ALL chess principles. IMO, one of the principles in chess is not to mistake these principles as necessary developments, but rather as a helping hand to understand how to use your pieces. There are certainly situations in place where principles don't apply anymore, because of the situation.
totally agree and what you pointed out is one of like 20 really exaggerated or just straight up wrong statements made by the video uploader who also apparently can't be bothered to learn the names of openings, get the pieces and squares correct, or calculate any variations. i think for anyone who is beyond beginner level, it's immediately apparent how bad and lazy this commentary is.
That bishop to g5 move from Magnus was FILTHY tho😂
Jól becsapdázta a bratyót....
overused joke
D5 opener....hahaha :)
Also your thumbnail is **STUNNED** as Magnus himself plays D4..
Yes, really stunning
"But he does not care"
Got it, Hikaru?
What a game the D5 opening is 💪
I love your narration. It’s like I’m watching a movie you’ve earned yourself a sub, sir
Magnus played the Queen's Gambit opening against the Queen of Chess. This guy is aggressive.
Beside the common opening move 1. d5 the first move by Polgar (1. ... Nf6) is NOT necessarily King's Indian. We also can get Nimzo-Indian or Queen's Indian for example.
In addition Na6 from Polgar is a very common move in the KID. Why so surprised?
Whoever did the commentary is an idiot and probably not even a chess player that's why. He knew if he made a video about Magnus he would get views and that's about it. Bssically clickbait
w channel, narrating and overall quality
has anybody noticed the thumbnail of the video?
Magnus plays the first move, d4, and the woman is apparently *stunned*
Magnus is apparently the only one in the world that can play the D5 opening with white :)
Judith is a very aggressive player. Always exciting to watch.
Of course Magnus will win Judith 90% of the time.
100%*
@@hamdi1903 420%*
*100000%
Judit beat Magnus last year though
Idk man based on this game I'd bet it's closer to 2-7-1 with the 7 being their chance of drawing. Maybe 3-6-1 or 3-5-2; but either way I think they are closer to even than not. Even if it's just a 5% difference.
For her: A nightmare
For Magnus: A normal day😂
Thumbnail:
Magus: plays d4
Judith: STUNNED
Wow, Judith tried playing a super aggressive game! Very cool
“Magnus plays d5, a standard opening move”
He's starting to believe...
Thumbnail is right. If White played d5 as first move, ANYONE would be stunned.
Magnus's comeback!
He has a strong all around game but his positional chess is out of this world.
Fun fact she beat magnus at a community chess match
aww your just mad that women suck, huge L
@@tsaanderson7385 I’m sure you’re quite familiar with one thing you will never see a woman suck.
Not surprised to see overrated Magnus defeated by a random grandmaster again. Garry and Kramnik were true champions.
Or more like a casual chess match at the park 😂...... She's not even close to Magnus level
@@hindugramsci yeah at a fking park. Competitive chess she ain't close to his level or many other gms lmao
Me who knows nothing about chess: "Ah yes, D5, a standard opening move" 🗿
Beautiful game. Magnus the the big Brain Genius.
Magnus' first move: D4
The thumbnail: *Stunned*
Man I really wanna learn the Carlsen Gambit with d5
Magnus eats 2700 rated players for breakfast lmao.
Elo, not fide
@ClassicalMate hey, what song was that, its been stuck in my head for ages, and I cant remember the name
holy s* 3:37 that kc3 move by carlsen trapped her elegantly
what a shocker, the #1 chess player beat the #1 female chess player
0:26 that's a little over dramatic
0:03 he wins. Her peak rating isn't even near Hikaru's...
It's hilarious making them out like they're equal. There's nearly 150 rating between their peak ratings.
@@fuckyoutube4398 What does a 150 rating difference even mean at that level? I randomly beat people hundreds of points higher, or lose to much lower... and for me that's a huge % difference. For them that's like a 5% difference. Plenty of room for their unique "personalities" to manifest --- by that I mean, everyone has certain positions they know better than others. Not everyone can be the best at all possible positions. There are likely unique situations where her playing style might give her the advantage.
why the absolute hell, I, having ZERO knowledge of chess, have fallen in a chess rabbit hole, at 6 am and why is this SOOO GOD DAMN ENTERTAINING?!
What is the piece being played at the start of the video?
Nah I love this channel
The other voice in your head doesn't like this channel?
@@Adamz678 lmao
d5? new opening learned
I know very little about chess but that was exciting, wow!
This narration was written by a 400 elo.
Her name is Judit. Not Judith. She's Hungarian.
sorry bro for getting wrong really like sorry bro
She pronounced it "Judith" in a video for chess24 when she defeated Magnus in a Blitz game last year at a park in Spain. You can hear it for yourself: czcams.com/video/hvbZCRid5CY/video.html
Looked pretty easy for magnus. Not only was he up material 20 moves in he was way ahead on time too. Judith is no slouch but magnus is king
I love this channel early
"1 drunk man is more talented than 3 woman with phd"
-Foo King
1:13 . . . Na6 is sort of normal in lines like this, right?
Yah in numerous lines actually
@@saitab-6435 Thanks! I thought I'd seen it in the 2023 WCC recently.
It's not a surprise that Magnus at his peak crashed an old Judith. What surprised me the most is that she did not know of this trap of the rook. It happens a lot in rook endgames. Even Ra6 was a mistake because it gives the tempo to white. Also she did not see the entrapment of the knight? Really? This is something that any 1000 Elo player knows. I can only assume that she does not play endgames very well, which is really strange for a top ranking player.
I'd chalk it up to tunnel-vision induced by nerves and the narrow time limit.
To be fair Peak Magnus is beating anyone, even peak Judith🤷🏾♂️ and as far as I know, she has won against him, in blitz but never in a classic game. But I did expect more during this game😂
@@bello808I'd love to see a classical game of Peak Judie and Peak Magnus.
Judit was an absolute viper, would make for an interesting match (Magnus would likely win, but Just would fare better than most)
this video changed my life
Bro can you shout out me
This was a really good gsme congrads to them both
I swear to god if ludwig makes this entire channel's legacy into 1 ten minute video and doesn't make any more videos on here because it was "a social experiment" imma be mad bcs I just wanted more videos on online lore then it stopped. Very sadge
Judit(udit) has beat him and 11 other World champions.
She's super aggressive and made world champions literally cry and cheat when she was a teenager.
Herself and Tal are my favorite style of play.
They don't rely on theroy as much as they create with forced aggression
*Magnus plays first move*
*Opponent shocked*
D6 would be even more aggressive move. But maybe he didn't wanted to scare her. 😂😂😂
Abhimanyu Mishra is now the youngest GM.
its brutal that the YT algorithm promotes such mediocre content. There are so many good chess content creators. This dud isn't one of them.
Wdym i liked the video
Praggnanada from india becomes GM in just at the age of 12years and IM at just 10 years 😎😎
You wouldnt make this comment if he wasnt from india lol
@@jackobot9027HAHAHHA you’re right
Still the champ even with the current battle going on.
one of the best chess chanels EASY
Wait… his “chess reputation would be ruined FOREVER” because he lost to another chess super-genius grand master? Huh?
You may not appreciate this but domination is much more important to a healthy male psyche than a healthy female psyche. Chess is ultimately a metaphor for war. If women can wage war on par with men, then what's the point of being a man? Why not let women fend for themselves? Suddenly society breaks apart and it's the year 20XX.
@@abominationdesolation8322 I think you missed what I said. “His chess reputation ruined FOREVER.” Forever is a really long time, never mind the fact he is arguably the greatest chess player of all time.
And who knew the only point in being a male is being able to wage war better than women?
Hell, Dylan Mulvaney just won “woman of the year.” Looks like men are even better at being women than women.
@@abominationdesolation8322women can't wage war on par with man in chess. Not when people like Magnis exist. That would be very delusional 😂😂. Judith is good, I can't lie, but she just can't compare to Magnus. Even in her prime. They're not on par at all. Even after beating him at 2rapid blitz games, he's won 11. And she's lost every classical chess game they've played together 🤷🏾♂️
@@John_Hoover What is this defensive egoistic nonsense? That has nothing to do with what I said.
@@abominationdesolation8322 You're addressing things that have nothing to do with what I said. You're talking about what's "the point of being a man" if you can't wage war as well as a woman (as if there haven't been hundreds of millions of men who haven't been in war) while I'm talking about the fallacious thinking in the video. What's the next sexist comment? - what's the point of being a woman if you can't cook as well as a man?
How does one grand master losing to another (female or male) DESTROY FOREVER the reputation of arguably the greatest chess player ever? Had he lost the game are we really to think Magnus' career would have been forever damaged? The whole premise is nonsense.
"what is he doing?"
*magnus moves the pawn 3 fookin squares*
"he's beginning to believe"
I had a amazing way to trap her piece at the end with maybe got me a longer win
Still can't believe this is the first video where Judit Polgar lost to World Chess Champion.
sounds nice, but man, do you know what are you talkin´ about? Doesnt seem like it...
Ik, 1. d4, 1. Nf6 is not the Kings Indian Defense. The Kings Indian Defense is 1. d4, 1. Nf6, 2. c4, 2. g6.
@@BloontoniumWizard 🤓👍
@@trickshotz8918 🤓
Love these vids
Yeah, yeah, 1. d5, the most famous opening move for white. Brilliant analysis. What am expert channel!
Did You knew that Judith overall defeated 11 distinc world champs over the years including el magnito. Judith really is the pride of chess
*_"defeated 11 distinc world champs"_*
A *_misleading_* statement. She did not "defeat 11 distinct world champs", she happened to win in some opportunity against them. Kasparov defeated her 12 times. She barely won only 1 game against him. Do you call THAT "defeat" a world champ?? Please. Be real
All in all, truth remains: she never became World champion against male players, so... calm down
@@deleatur absolutely. Winning a game against a world champion is a phenomenal accomplishment. Winning a game against 11 is incredible (I have no clue if that number is actually true). No doubt she has a losing record against them over all their games, but she is still an incredible talent. I think some people are sticking up for her because the video acts like Magnus’ reputation would be ruined “forever” if he lost to a woman, which is pretty shitty to say.
@@cock5268 She lost horribly and only won some matches, being a super GM, winning against other super GMs is a good acomplishment, but it is incomparable to the terrible loses she suffered.
@@deleatur "She happened to win" is a misleading statement on the face of it in almost any English sentence, so... calm down... pink dildo owner.
@@vietta6424
Dude, Magnus defeated Karpov and played then-reigning world champion Kasparov to a draw at his first chess tournament at 13. Karpov was impressed with young Magnus playing at that level at that age while Kasparov simply shook Magnus' hand and left rather quickly.
I absolutely love this channel, probably the best chess channel ever, go and exceed GothamChess as well!
Classical will never be as good as Mr. And he sacrificed the ROOOOOOOOK!
@@dragonplayz2012 Maybe he will, I have high expectations for this channel
Vivaldis Winter great choise of Music!
My game won't let me play the D5 opener. I must need to reboot.