Robotic Process Automation (RPA) bots in action
Vložit
- čas přidán 3. 08. 2024
- In this demo, see how an RPA bot can free employees from highly repetitive, manual tasks. An account opening process is used as an example. Learn more about IBM Robotic Process Automation a ibm.co/2DTIlUt.
Earn a badge with FREE Kubernetes browser-based labs: ibm.biz/kubernetes-labs
#RoboticProcessAutomation #RPA #Automation - Věda a technologie
This is an EXCELLENT video for quickly understanding what RPA is all about.
Great video demonstrating the efficiency and benefits associated with RPA technology!
Thank you! This is great!
It depends on windows? It cannot be used into linux or another OS?
this demo show how to work with systems that dont have a good solution to process a bunch of information. In this case for example, why dont the CMIS and Line of credit account system develop an api or web service for the communication with bpm?
What when this systems change? you don't have control about ids or names of the inputs on the views (where you copy and paste).
Do you need a desktop enviroment to run this task? why is not totally automated and save the time of create that human service?
how foolproof is the robotic process automation in terms of windows error messages, warnings, and etcetera of intrusive little windows when they pop up?
how to create these videos?
Hi, great depiction, may I know how to use the effort clock animation customized to our need?
Cool one. But I have question, what's the difference between RPA and ERP?
A new twist on an old idea. Those of you that remember the product SideKick from Borland are already familiar with process automation. It killed me watching all that copy & paste going on.
Greg Settle zee g ff
So IBM now invented the macro?
There is a big difference between "RPA" and "Macro"!!!
@@mamunurrashid5652 this video did not show that
Same as automation testing in Q.A
RPA improves your credit.
The question is whether employers will really use all that freed-up labor to improve customer service. Would they be tempted to just let people go and keep the same level of customer service in order to cut costs? If they're getting by with today's level of customer service, what incentive do they have to re-apply those human resources instead of doing without them?
They can now grow business with the same amount of manpower.
Copy & Paste.... Leaves alot of room for error... The concept is great however mirroring the information between primary and secondary systems would be much more efficient and also would reduces the TAT.
Time to reevaluate the business application architecture? That was simply ridiculous! www.dynamics.com
I was gonna say...Why don't these systems just talk to each other in the first place?