I picked up the 28-135 f/4 used very cheap. I've found it to be a bit soft. I do like that it has OS. My Sigma 24 - 70mm is noticeably sharper. Been using both on a Sony FX3.
Thanks for the in-depth review. I just ordered it to complement my Sony line-up, but more and more I'm getting convinced this might help to lighten my overall kit, as I won' t have to bring the heavies along....seems well suited for my run-and-gun style.
I picked up this lens second hand for 28-135. It’s satisfying to use for all around coverage. I agree with you on the 24-105 shooting experience. That lens is fine for mirrorless body, but having to manually zoom with your hand on the barrel feels weird. I also found that my mics would pick up the sound of the barrel as it moved in and out. So the PZ is my go to, and then when I want something faster I’ve liked the 24 and 50 GM lenses.
Absolutely, it's curious as to why Sony's servo lens options are so few an far in between. There was a 16-35mm f/4 servo released this year, but that focal length has very few genuine applications.
I too have this lens on my FX6 for corporate events/meetings. This combo has the added advantage that you get a nice slow zoom by plugging a Lanc controller into the back of the FX6. Autofocus and stabilisation is perfect when tracking moving presenters on stage.
I bought this lens prior to getting the FX6 knowing it would be a very good match. Actually it was about a year in advance and used it a few times with my FS7. I didn't really like it on the FS7 but when put on the FX6 these two pieces works so great together it's like they are one. Image quality although being F4 is nothing short of great and it is my main lens on the FX6.
Nobody but you but and a few others care about what a lens looks like on a camera versus how it looks optically with the camera. Also that fair footage you show, why is it so soft and looking out of focus. I hope the image quality is better than what I am seeing on that sample!
@@MuonVideo Please explain why the video you show using this lens is so soft. What was the point of showing such terribly soft and out-of-focus (in most cases) video? It completely undermines your credibility.
I just tried the Tamron 35-150 f2.0-2.8 and really like that. You loose a bit on the wide end. No stabilisation, but men, nice images at 2.8 all the way or even f2.0/2.5 till around 50mm.
Yeah, I kinda agree. That b-roll footage doesn't do any justice to that awesome rig you have. Looks just as if it'd been shot with a bad quality phone 🤨
You could try the Fujinon lenses with the FX6 in 4K with clear image zoom on. I'm thinking of doing a test with those lenses to see if there is any noticable quality loss. The main reason I don't use clear image zoom when using my other Sony lenses is because it disables auto-focus. But that's not a factor with the Fujinon lenses ;)
The bokeh definitely does not 'wow' like modern G-Master lenses. Aesthetically, this is not the best lens purely for picture. It's more of a 'utilitarian' lens.
I'm curious to get this lens for an indie feature, specifically to use for slow creeping zooms. I've heard the zoom is "too fast" even at the slowest setting. any take on that?
Out of the box, the lens' zoom quality is serviceable, but not exemplary. For a slow creeping effect, it's totally doable with Sony's Zoom Controller. Check out my Best Accessories for the FX6 video where I demonstrate zoom quality/speed with and without the controller on this lens.
I also own the lens. I like it much overall, only the servo Motor is way too slow and its sad it can't do full manual zooms. Also I have a lot of trouble pulling manual Focus with it. Wit my other Sigma 14-24 and 24-70 mm it is very snappy with short throw but I on the 28-135 the throw seems endles long. Tried to make a rack focus the other day and I could not make it in one handmovement which means the shot is not usable. With autofocus it works flawlessly though. Any hints about using the manual focus?
is it parfocal ? and so if im fully zoomed in into someones face can i zoom out with the rocker and it will stay in focus ? it would be a slow zoom out
Is the 28-135 lens parfocal? If you're shooting an event "A-Z" like in one of my applications, especially going live and single-camera, you need not only smooth servo zoom, but also for that focus to stay intact throughout the range (by focusing on the main subject, e.g., a speaker at a podium, and having that stay in focus while you zoom in or out).
Good afternoon. Tell me how much it loses in sharpness and autofocus speed to other lenses, for example 24-105/f4. I have sony m3 and sony s3. Does it make sense to buy 28-135?
The 28-135 keeps speed with 24-105 when it comes to autofocus. The 24-105 is visible sharper than the 28-135. So if sharpness is a priority, you should go for the 24-105.
Two months ago I bought a camera Sony FX6 and lens Sony 28-135 G OSS. I have problem with focus setting. When I'm connecting the camera and lens I cannot activate the AF on the camera. A message appears on the screen "cannot execute function because of the condition of the lens". On the camcorder, the AF is set to face detection. The lens mount is clean. About two weeks ago, everything was still working
Just curious can you control the zoom? Via the Dji gimbal? Do you need a zoom/focus motor to make that work only? Or can you control it electronically?
You can control the 28-135 zoom using the hand rockers of the FX3/FX6/FX9, or control it by the hand rocker on the lens itself (for instance, this is how I operate the lens on the A7S3.)
Well, it's an f4 lens. So, it's not the best at low light. For that, you might want to switch to a fast prime lens. However, because the sensor in the FX6 is so clean at high ISOs, it might be good enough.
Agree .Had this lens parked on my shelf unused for maybe 4 years.The FX6 gave it a new lease of life.
I picked up the 28-135 f/4 used very cheap. I've found it to be a bit soft. I do like that it has OS. My Sigma 24 - 70mm is noticeably sharper. Been using both on a Sony FX3.
Hey any new opinions after 6 more months with the 28-135? DOF?
Thanks for the in-depth review. I just ordered it to complement my Sony line-up, but more and more I'm getting convinced this might help to lighten my overall kit, as I won' t have to bring the heavies along....seems well suited for my run-and-gun style.
I picked up this lens second hand for 28-135. It’s satisfying to use for all around coverage. I agree with you on the 24-105 shooting experience. That lens is fine for mirrorless body, but having to manually zoom with your hand on the barrel feels weird. I also found that my mics would pick up the sound of the barrel as it moved in and out. So the PZ is my go to, and then when I want something faster I’ve liked the 24 and 50 GM lenses.
Absolutely, it's curious as to why Sony's servo lens options are so few an far in between. There was a 16-35mm f/4 servo released this year, but that focal length has very few genuine applications.
I too have this lens on my FX6 for corporate events/meetings. This combo has the added advantage that you get a nice slow zoom by plugging a Lanc controller into the back of the FX6. Autofocus and stabilisation is perfect when tracking moving presenters on stage.
I bought this lens prior to getting the FX6 knowing it would be a very good match. Actually it was about a year in advance and used it a few times with my FS7. I didn't really like it on the FS7 but when put on the FX6 these two pieces works so great together it's like they are one. Image quality although being F4 is nothing short of great and it is my main lens on the FX6.
You sound just like Owen Wilson. I wanna try this lens now 😎
I e been looking at this lens for sure
Nobody but you but and a few others care about what a lens looks like on a camera versus how it looks optically with the camera. Also that fair footage you show, why is it so soft and looking out of focus.
I hope the image quality is better than what I am seeing on that sample!
For a better demonstration of the lens, see here (all shots are the 28-135): czcams.com/video/0Ui-XGXqBJU/video.html
@@MuonVideo Please explain why the video you show using this lens is so soft. What was the point of showing such terribly soft and out-of-focus (in most cases) video? It completely undermines your credibility.
@@markr041 The lens isn't the sharpest. I have one for my FX9 and agree it is a bit soft.
Absolutely my opinion 👍🏻 I use my fx6 the most time with exact this lense 💪🏼 very good video 👏 best cinematic greetings from germany
What about bokeh? Does it work with f4 Lens?
I just tried the Tamron 35-150 f2.0-2.8 and really like that. You loose a bit on the wide end. No stabilisation, but men, nice images at 2.8 all the way or even f2.0/2.5 till around 50mm.
Footage looks like hdv. I’m more than sure this lens doesn’t match well with this camera. But for budget reasons I can see why it’s practical
For a better demonstration of the 28-135's image quality, see here (all shots are the 28-135): czcams.com/video/0Ui-XGXqBJU/video.html
Yeah, I kinda agree. That b-roll footage doesn't do any justice to that awesome rig you have. Looks just as if it'd been shot with a bad quality phone 🤨
Still a great lens for does who understand its capabilities even at F4.It’s actually a bargain.
It really is! Even still to this day, plus adding a zoom control helps finesse things a bit.
Dope vid
Dude 16-35 is awesome to make a naked Fx6 ultra light! 635g
You could try the Fujinon lenses with the FX6 in 4K with clear image zoom on. I'm thinking of doing a test with those lenses to see if there is any noticable quality loss. The main reason I don't use clear image zoom when using my other Sony lenses is because it disables auto-focus. But that's not a factor with the Fujinon lenses ;)
have you done this? I wanted to as well. I am struggling to find a good zoom for the FX6, especially with a servo... like the 18-110
@@francis_ces - I wonder if anyone has tried the Canon 18-80 Servo zoom. It's super 35, but I suppose you could use it in crop mode?
@@bobbleczar FX6 crop mode is HD only
Nice insight! What shotgun mic are you using? and how is it?
What would say about the Sony18-110 PZ with a FX6? Thank's a lot…
Thanks for your video, I m looking for an allrounder lens, but i am not sure about bokeh with f4. You didn't mention this in your video
The bokeh definitely does not 'wow' like modern G-Master lenses. Aesthetically, this is not the best lens purely for picture. It's more of a 'utilitarian' lens.
I'm curious to get this lens for an indie feature, specifically to use for slow creeping zooms. I've heard the zoom is "too fast" even at the slowest setting. any take on that?
Out of the box, the lens' zoom quality is serviceable, but not exemplary. For a slow creeping effect, it's totally doable with Sony's Zoom Controller. Check out my Best Accessories for the FX6 video where I demonstrate zoom quality/speed with and without the controller on this lens.
I also own the lens. I like it much overall, only the servo Motor is way too slow and its sad it can't do full manual zooms. Also I have a lot of trouble pulling manual Focus with it. Wit my other Sigma 14-24 and 24-70 mm it is very snappy with short throw but I on the 28-135 the throw seems endles long. Tried to make a rack focus the other day and I could not make it in one handmovement which means the shot is not usable. With autofocus it works flawlessly though. Any hints about using the manual focus?
Soft focus.
is it parfocal ? and so if im fully zoomed in into someones face can i zoom out with the rocker and it will stay in focus ?
it would be a slow zoom out
Is the 28-135 lens parfocal? If you're shooting an event "A-Z" like in one of my applications, especially going live and single-camera, you need not only smooth servo zoom, but also for that focus to stay intact throughout the range (by focusing on the main subject, e.g., a speaker at a podium, and having that stay in focus while you zoom in or out).
Yeah it is. I own it also
Good afternoon. Tell me how much it loses in sharpness and autofocus speed to other lenses, for example 24-105/f4. I have sony m3 and sony s3. Does it make sense to buy 28-135?
The 28-135 keeps speed with 24-105 when it comes to autofocus. The 24-105 is visible sharper than the 28-135. So if sharpness is a priority, you should go for the 24-105.
Большое спасибо за ответ.
24-105 у меня уже имеется, а 28-135 больше подойдёт для видео.
Two months ago I bought a camera Sony FX6 and lens Sony 28-135 G OSS. I have problem with focus setting. When I'm connecting the camera and lens I cannot activate the AF on the camera.
A message appears on the screen "cannot execute function because of the condition of the lens". On the camcorder, the AF is set to face detection. The lens mount is clean. About two weeks ago, everything was still working
perhaps you pulled the focusing backwards. Than it is in manual mode. So you have to push it forward.
Just curious can you control the zoom? Via the Dji gimbal? Do you need a zoom/focus motor to make that work only? Or can you control it electronically?
You can control the 28-135 zoom using the hand rockers of the FX3/FX6/FX9, or control it by the hand rocker on the lens itself (for instance, this is how I operate the lens on the A7S3.)
@@MuonVideo would you be able to control the zoom via the gimbal by anychance? I have a Dji rs2
Is it good to shoot film with at low light conditions??
Well, it's an f4 lens. So, it's not the best at low light. For that, you might want to switch to a fast prime lens.
However, because the sensor in the FX6 is so clean at high ISOs, it might be good enough.