Well spotted. CZcams now make it difficult to show corrections by way of annotation so it will have to stand as is. I hope/don't think it will detract from the value of the video.
Agreed. Pity about CZcams's unfriendliness to corrections. Are you still able to add it to the description/notes? If not, I wouldn't call it a serious problem. Your line of reasoning flows really well. As a mathematician myself, I'm quite pleased with your path to this beautiful result. It's a fact I just remember at this point, being so long since I learned it, so this was good to see. Thanks for posting!
Around 4:14 I say and write 144 when I mean 414.
Pi is a number.
All primes are numbers.
Boom.
Optimus prime isn't a number.
Not with that attitude
@@martinshoosterman Prime Time isn't a number (but a song by the Alan Parsons Project) ;-).
Thank you that was quite enlightening. i know both the formulas but never thought about combining them.
Excellent presentation Sir.Thanks .DrRahul Rohtak Haryana India
Thanks. Glad you're enjoying some of my videos.
Amazing relationship.
At ≈ 4:14 (ironically!), you've swapped the first two digits in the chosen term of the sum of inverse squares. Because
2·3²·23 = 414 ≠ 144
Well spotted. CZcams now make it difficult to show corrections by way of annotation so it will have to stand as is. I hope/don't think it will detract from the value of the video.
Agreed. Pity about CZcams's unfriendliness to corrections. Are you still able to add it to the description/notes? If not, I wouldn't call it a serious problem.
Your line of reasoning flows really well. As a mathematician myself, I'm quite pleased with your path to this beautiful result. It's a fact I just remember at this point, being so long since I learned it, so this was good to see.
Thanks for posting!
And thanks for your astute comments across several of my videos!