Is this the best hiking camera? | Sony RX10iv review
Vložit
- čas přidán 8. 07. 2024
- Is the Sony RX10iv the best hiking camera you can buy? It might be a few years old now, but the Sony RX10iv is probably still the hiking camera to beat. Watch the video for my thoughts after owning the camera for a few years.
For full specs, visit the Sony website:
www.sony.co.uk/electronics/cy...
If you want to support the channel, please drop the video a like and subscribe, it really helps.
If you want to say thanks for any of my content you can always buy me a coffee - I don't actually drink coffee so any money received would be spent on used camping gear and the odd can of own-brand energy drink.
www.buymeacoffee.com/thewalki...
You can find walking routes in South Wales and much more on my website:
thewalkingkev.co.uk/
Chapters:
0:00 Introduction footage shot with the Sony RX10iv
1:16 Introducing the camera
2:54 1 inch sensor
4:03 The Zoom Range
4:48 This camera does it all
7:23 The Autofocus is amazing
7:57 The best camera and final thoughts
#hiking #sonyrx10iv #cameratest
Do you carry a dedicated camera on your walk / camps or do you just use your phone? Let me know below.
This one lo lol
@@MrBillkaz good choice!
I took my RX100 on a recent trip to Greece, as it's much smaller and lighter, with the same size sensor and still has a reasonable zoom. However it doesn't have the usability of a full-size camera with buttons and dials. I ended up using the RX100 more or less as a point and shoot, so would have been better off with just my phone really. The RX10 is a hefty beast for sure, but it's the kind of cam that makes you stop and really think about the shot, the lighting, angles, timing etc. It's also reasonably rugged and shrugs off the odd splash. I'd say the main thing is it's well-made and will last many years, so it's worth learning all the (amazing) features.
@@CapRo72 I've no idea how Sony menus compare with Nikon, but it really depends how much you're changing settings. Once setup how you like it I don't think you need to dig into the menus much.
@@CapRo72 that's crazy the price difference! I'm sure you'll enjoy it, it's a great camera.
Hi and thank you for your insight.
I started my wildlife and scenic photography career over 43 years ago, and have been retired for the last 5 or so years. I worked around the world but call NZ home, which is where I do most of my hiking (we call it 'tramping' over here). One of the attractions of NZ is its varied topography: everything from long beaches and sand dunes, through rain forest, to deserts and volcanoes, to high alps. As such, taking decent images of my tramps was important to me, and I would inevitably carry up to 3 cameras with me: a tough camera like the Olympus TG-5 or the Nikon 1AW1 (with its 1" sensor) to use when the environment would be too hostile for normal photography; and two DSLRs - one with a wide minor telephoto (like EF-S 15-85 for APS-C, or the EF 24-105 for FF), and something like the EF 70-300 on either type of body for wildlife. I am pretty fit, so had no issues with carrying these - usually in well-padded holsters. Still as time has gone on, and I have had a couple of injuries, being able to go lighter and in a more compact form became more pressing, so I looked at bridge cameras.
For a while I toyed with the Canon PS SH50 and 60HS cameras, with a zoom range from 21-1360mm equivalent. However, I was frustrated by the limitations of the tiny 1 2/3" sensors. I wanted something bigger for the low light work and resolution.
I should say at this point that much depends on what one is going to shoot and produce. I love shooting scenery and wildlife, which in NZ mostly means birds, which can be a challenge for birds in deep bush or soaring over mountains so one needs low light performance, fast focus, a long reach and good tracking. The demands for large, detailed, high-resolution Fine Art prints for sale are significantly higher than those for posting to social media or digital display. When I retired I had pretty much decided to go for digital display as my default output, so on multi-day hikes I didn't need the APS-C and FF sensors, with their associated bulk and weight .
When I came across the Sony RX10MkIV I was impressed by the build ( it claims to be environmentally sealed as much as any camera with an extending lens), the excellent zoom range of the Zeiss optics, BSI/Stacked sensor and image stabilization. It has a 315 point phase detect focus system and eye tracking. I am a stills-only shooter, so video features were not significant to me. While all of those were great, I found the Sony menus to be a nightmare after shooting Fuji, Canon, Olympus and Nikon. I found the manual to be pretty horrific too, but I purchased a third-party book and devoured that to set up the buttons and custom menus so I don't have to go into the main menu system much at all.
The 20MP 1" Backside Illuminated sensor is competent, with a fast throughput and good size buffer. You need that because in high speed continuous shooting it hammers out stills at 24 fps - which may not be too exciting in terms of the latest generation of Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Cameras (MILCs), but in 2017 that was almost unheard of! It still holds its own against its bridge camera peers today and is still (IMHO) the best in class.
The EVF and LCD are both excellent, although I would prefer one that hinged side to side as well as the current up and down (which does work well). The focal range of 24-600mm equivalent is massive but there are cameras out there that go up to 2000 or even 3000mm - looking at Nikon Coolpix P1000 here. However, those cameras use a much smaller sensor, and frankly shooting with lenses of that focal length is very challenging hand-held - unless one wants to lug a tripod on the trail too! I might add that the image stabilization in this unit is excellent and I have no issues hand-hold shooting at maximum focal lengths.
The RX-10IV does have a trick up its sleeve however. If you want to double the focal length there is a feature called Clear Image Zoom, buried in the menus under Camera Settings 1, Zoom Setting. Essentially, it uses some very clever algorithms to interpolate pixels rather than just magnify it to digitally zoom to up to 1200mm equivalent. The result is a near flawless expansion. There is an another alternative to get the same result. Selecting a lower Image Size in the menus frees pixels across the sensor to do the interpolation and thus create the potential for an effective doubling of the FL. Now, my preference is to shoot RAW, which does not support Clear Image Zoom, so I found a simple way of switching between the two for those occasions when I need it.
I set up the Function Menu to include a setting to select CIZ, and another to select file format. I leave the setting to CIZ but if I want to switch back and forth, I just set the file format to RAW+JPG for 24-600mm, and l select Extra Fine format and the camera automatically goes to Clear Image Zoom mode of 24-1200mm. To switch back again, I just return to RAW+JPG mode.
This camera is brilliant for what it is intended to do: namely be that one camera does it all solution. I can produce great images for digital display and great prints up to about A2 size - I may be able to do better but have not tried that.
Huge thanks for taking the time to share your story and insights. A lot of people have been critical of Sony menus over the years and I think on more recent cameras they've been trying to improve things - this camera is long overdue an update.
I hope your tramping is going well, you've certainly got a stunning country to explore!
Thank you for taking time to make this video. It was very encouraging and helped me to confirm my decision to purchase one I thoroughly enjoy the outdoors and hiking I was looking for the perfect all-around camera and I’m very confident that this is the one. I look forward to more videos from your channel. Thank you so much.
Cheers Gary. It's a great camera for hiking as it really does do it all.
I Love this camera.
I have had this camera since the first year it was released. As an all round camera, it is hard to beat. Like Kev, I do a lot of hiking, and was tied of carrying so much weight, with my previous camera and lenes. I agree with his opinion about low light performance of this camera. It will do it, but nowhere as good as a crop or full frame camera. I do a lot of wildlife shooting, and this is where the rx10 shines. Great range, sharpness, and focussing. You always have the right lens on. The weather sealing is excellent as well.
Absolutely Tim, you sacrifice the ultimate low light performance to always have the 'right' lens on, and the sensor stays clean as no lenses to switch. Weather sealing does seem decent, I've had it out in some dodgy weather.
Because it's so good for wildlife and general stuff I often take a full frame camera out with a small prime on it for landscapes.
How far have you pushed the weather sealing? Humidity, temperature etc. Thanks.
I own a Panasonic FZ1000ii which can be consider in the same kind of group to this rx10iv only the specs and abilities far behind the rx. I prefer the RX but pick the FZ due to the much cheaper price, size, easy operating and the weight. Mainly the price.
RX much higher level than FZ:
Longer Zoom Range
Sharper images
Wider range of expanded ISO
Wider aperture: 2.4
Higher fps
Etc...
Thanks for the informative video and great sample footage.
Thanks, you're welcome. Thanks for taking the time to comment.
Yes I bought one used in 2019, a guy went into the LCE in Plymouth and traded in all his DSLR stuff because he needed a lighter system he bought my camera took it out twice and went back and got an even smaller camera and I went in and bought it and I am so happy with it, there is a local wide life park near me and I love taking it up there, and if you play with the HFR mode with animals, fantastic. Nice video, keep safe.
Cheers Bill. Sounds like what I did, although I kept my full frame and some small lenses purely for landscape photography. On hikes I sometimes take both cameras as I like the 42mp full frame for landscape. However, a lot of the time I just take the RX10IV as it's way more flexible.
Thanks for stopping by, appreciate it.
I am an ocean fishing guide in Alaska and have six cameras. This is without a doubt my GO TO when the weather is nice. 24-600mm with crazy fast auto focus cannot be beat for the $$$
Totally agree. In good light the autofocus is very impressive, alongside the image quality. It's very much a pack and forget camera, you've got it all covered.
How's it behave in low light?
I have one! Have yet to take a lot of pictures but so far I'm impressed. Nice video. Nice pics too.
Enjoy it! It's a fantastic camera. I hope you take photos and make great memories with it.
I have this camera and it is brilliant! Low light it isn't as good as a full frame 35 mm DSLR or Mirrorless but bad light doesn't do larger image formats much justice either . Decent light improves most scenes and good light is sometimes the only way to compare the difference between a good pair of binoculars and a less quality pair . All optical instruments require decent light to perform to their best in lifing camera lenses . In photography or digital photography good light improves sharpness , contrast and colour rendering . I agree with most of what you are saying about the the Sony RX10 4 and wouldn't be without it ! DXO photolab 3 Elite or newer is brilliant with the Sony RX10 4. Some other software doesn't do the Carl Zeiss lens justice . Some other software leaves problems with the edge of frame not being sharp and even stretches or distorts the periphery/edge of the image . When I transfer images from my RX10 4, I use DXO photolab 3 Elite first for lens corrections/noise reduction and if I need to use Lightroom I transfer in , turning off Lightrooms lens corrections as that aspect isn't as good as the DXO version as above . A CZcamsr called Robin Whalley found the sharpness issue and did a video 3 yrs ago about selling camera's due to sharpness issues only to find out it was the software ! It in particular affected the Sony RX10 he had at the time . I also have a Canon Eos R, Canon RF24 to 105mm F4 and a Canon RF 800mm F11 . The Canon RF800mm F11 requires a decent level of light also , working within your equipments capabilities and knowing the limitations will enable you to get the best results . I do mainly wildlife photography but also occasionally shoot landscapes . Both my cameras can produce very good results under good light conditions . My favourite is the Sony RX10 4, you won't miss anything changing lenses . You can shoot silent shutter for wildlife and if filming you can turn off the aperture click so your microphone won't pick it up when changing f stop ! Did you know the RX10 4 has a leaf shutter like on some medium format camera lenses (Hasselblad and Bronica for example) . When you have a leaf shutter it allows flash synchronization throughout all shutter speeds ! Enjoy your Sony RX10 4 , I know over time it will reveal all sorts of extra capabilities that you may not have realised it had , I still do . Best wishes, Richard.
Cheers Richard for sharing. I love the RX10 for it's do-anything-well flexibility. In particular autofocus is such a luxury for me as before I used solely manual focus, largely vintage lenses on a Sony A6000 and Sony A7Rii and A7ii. I did a lot of wildlife shooting with an old Canon FD 500mm f4.5L which was capable of stunning results.
It's a great camera as if you're going for a hike and you don't know what to expect, the Sony RX10iv will capture pretty much anything.
Wow what a brilliant and insightful comment good sir … I couldn’t mirror or agree with your sentiments anymore.. your particular insight and experience is really an awesome perspective for me as while I am very passionate for photography I have only had a Panasonic and then the ex10 :./ I had to chuckle when you were going over all of its attributes and you mentioned the silent shutter lol I’m very intricate when I’m shooting a particular subject especially birds I have all this these little tricks I use Weatherby facing a total different direction and trying to look down at the one downside of the camera which is the camera the screen does not articulate fully because birds will allow you to trick them but they have a limit say if you’re using noise or you’re too close that combination will scare them away but I absolutely love the sound of the shutter lol almost feels like I’m shooting a gun again when I have it in high frame rate but I want a good image more than my childlike love for the sound it makes when you let it rip at 20 frames a second man I really utilize the full potential of the Panasonic fully articulated screen cause like I said I’m very particular when I’m out in the field whether be completely on the ground in a military crawl and not compromising the intimacy of the image you can get if you’re on a even level with the birds eyes it’s amazing as long as you’re facing in a different direction and you’re not moving around the camera can be pointed at them and they’re usually pretty cool about it but thank you so much for your awesome message
Oh and I forgot to mention it was actually the reason why I messaged you originally I couldn’t mirror and agree more with your commentary on post process that was another very challenging step in my progress as I spent 12 years which is a cell phone camera but when I bought the Sony I really wanted to cover all my bases so I bought a laptop I researched specifically what editing programs would potentially be more effective or utilize superior noise reduction and in my research I actually read exactly what you wrote and right now I’m sampling DXO photo lab six I believe I bought four and it was very happy with it although my apple wouldn’t allow me to see the little box where you can preview the corrections but they didn’t do any major upgrades with DXO5 but six they incorporated a deep prime that is absolutely more improved I’m actually kind of blooming away and while I’m sure many people wouldn’t really care or not appreciate the awesome improvement to image quality it really blows me away and it gets me out of my anxiety I get when I have to bump up my ISO range into the 16 to 3200 range I don’t know if you read this message and I have no idea what editing program you’re currently using but I can’t recommend checking out photolab six more food like five socks I bought their Nick package as well as presets which keeps him I’d be hit or miss but I do find that sometimes if I use a preset and the green level is too high I’ll go to the far right icon and it allows you to readjust the presets
Enjoyed your video! I have to completely agree with you. I was a Canon guy for some time just an enthusiast photographer. I was always carrying around the body and a couple of lenses but still not always happy with the results. I came across the RX10 IV three years ago, bought it and it changed everything for me. I tell everyone I know (who cares) that they need to get one. It's not designed for a pro; I'll never be one. It's for guys (and gals) like us who enjoy hiking and walkabouts. You always have the correct lens with you to use in an instant (it's almost impossible to miss a shot) plus the video is fabulous. Anyway, I'm glad you're enjoying yours!
Thanks for stopping by. I agree with your sentiment entirely, it's just a superb device to help you get out in nature and capture whatever you come across.
So inspiring your video. I have now taken my RX10iv out to play with thanks to you. Forgot how brilliant it was and yes definitely take it out on walks etc, fits nicely into my Wandrd sling bag. Have been using the RX10 mark 7 compact, which is also fantastic. I just don't realise how lucky I am. Have been told that Sony are not making any more compact cameras. Excellent camera the RX10iv - got mine from Camera In the Post company from Hong Kong, saved a fortune. Keep doing your videos beautiful footage.
Thanks, you've got two cracking Sony cameras there. It does seem like Sony are going to abandon both camera lines which seems a real shame given how much tech they could continue to cram into them.
Great footage, bought the camera too for it being so compact and capable. Have both OM1 and G9II next to it.
Nice, that's some serious kit. I've since sold this camera and have a Sony HX-99 instead and a Sony A7CII.
I fully agree, the RX10 iv is a treasure of a camera like the Swiss Army knife of the camera world. Nice video, thanks!!
Thanks Pete. It really is... The only issue for me is lack of timelapse mode and that it's not getting quite old. Please Sony, bring out the Mk5!
I researched cameras for a long time before heading off to India on a 3-week trip to celebrate early retirement. This is the camera I finally settled on, having been a long time Nikon FF user. I'm now fully invested in the Fuji system (having long sold the Sony) but still to this day, some of my favourite photos are from India (landscape, wildlife (only one on our trip to get a tiger shot!), street and portraiture using the RX10iv. I now find myself on a regular basis scouring the sites for a cheap secondhand RX10iv again. And when I find one at a good price I will buy it again and not let it go again!! 😉😊
Ha ha. It's a great camera and just does it all really well. I sometimes wish I'd taken the full frame camera out when I shoot certain landscape shots... But then I need the zoom and get landscape shots I couldn't get with my full frame camera.
Good luck finding one.
Thank you for the insight into the RX10m4, I purchased mine some 12 to 18 months ago and just starting to relize its worth. I take it hiking, kayaking and will be taking also on my Pack Horsing trips, should get some great shots. Took me a while to work the camera settings out but starting to love this camera for its versatility. I have taken some contest winning photos, and improving all the time, not too sure whether I will advance to interchangeable lens camera at this point, would only need to get that odd wider landscape, but I am coping quite well atm. Thank you
That's great to hear. For just pure landscape I think the best value camera out there now is the used Sony A7RII, you can get them pretty cheap and put a decent lens on it and it's amazing. But I don't use mine much at the moment as the RX10IV does so much more.
Great presentation of the merits of this camera. Always wanted one of these. I had a Lumix FZ1000, which is 1" sensor as well, not as sharp and not as much range, but much less expensive and still very fast operating and reliable. Each camera has its strengths, and the 1" sensor platforms are truly jack of all trades, with the Sony RX10 having an exceptional lens.
I've tried to replicate the experience of an all-in-one by pairing a Tamron 18-300mm ( 27-450mm equivalent) with a Fujifilm APS-C body (X-E3). The Tamron's performance is as good as it can get for a zoom of this range on a crop sensor. And that is both good and bad. The larger the sensor, increasingly more compromises need to be made to keep a superzoom compact and light. Having tried a number of zooms from small sensor Lumix FZ200/300 and Fz1000 I can say that these smaller sensor cameras can hold their own against the Tamron or exceed it, even with less megapixels. Recently I picked up an FZ300 again, and was surprised the quality I could eek out of it now that I have more experience.
The main advantages of the Tamron, is that it is has manual zoom action, which allows for fast focal length adjustments. When I use this lens, it's typically the only lens I'll bring with me, and I embrace all its strengths and weaknesses. So in a lot of ways, its a lot like using a bridge camera. This lens is also available for Sony cameras, so this could be an option for those looking to get an RX-like experience with some flexibility on the body. Considering that 5 years later the RX10IV still fetch high-prices, it might be an option. I'd also recommend the Lumix FZ1000 with the Mark II model having similar quality but just better overall performance. Both are a fraction of the cost of the RX10. And btw, that 1" sensor is actually made by Sony (just not quite as good as the one in the RX10). For those that want ridiculous range with mostly daytime shooting, check out the Nikon P950.
On the flipside, I'm also enjoying limiting myself to using 1 or 2 fixed focal length manual lenses (a 50mm F1.1 and a 135mm F2 on APSC), with fast/bright aperture and work within the range of possibilities that allows.
Thanks for the kind words and comments. I agree that a 1 inch sensor can really compete with APS-C in the right light and that it's hard to get a zoom that matches the superzoom bridge cameras, but it sounds as if the Tamron is a solid option.
I only use manual focus vintage lenses with my full frame A7RII which is a completely different experience, especially just shooting with prime lenses.
The RX10 still fetches crazy prices, I've often looked at the Lumix for my daughter...
Headed to Scotland this September and have purchased this camera for the very reasons you suggest. I was dreading the thought of carrying my Nikon D850 and assorted lenses. Thanks for reinforcing all my thoughts!
It'll be great for that kind of trip. You'll have it all covered. Hope you have a good one.
I use full frame cameras & prime long lenses. This camera, even though it’s a bit long in the tooth, holds its head high in that company. If I need to go light, I won’t hesitate to leave the big cameras at home. Yes, the low light performance isn’t as good, but with AI programmes such as DXO Raw, that’s mostly recoverable. A superb all-rounder & until the MkV (please Sony!) the best in class. Great video. Thanks.
Thanks Gavin. I'm not sure why Sony haven't updated this camera yet. Hopefully new version out soon with upgraded video and a better sensor... Maybe a bigger zoom as well.
I love taking photos when I am out. I’ve got a canon EOS 500D. I can take pics on my GoPro but I quite like taking photos on my actual camera as they are so much better quality in my opinion. I think the pics come out nicer so I tend to take it with me unless I am on a long distance trail, then I just stick to the go pro as it is so lightweight.
Yeah, I see from your videos you've often got your camera on you. I've always taken at least one proper camera on a walk, even on my 53 mile hike!
I suddenly needed to replace my Nikon that I had planned to take on a big trip to Antarctica. 3 weeks before departure with no camera and no good prospects. Somehow I got wind of this Sony all-in-one and went for it. Initially I was completely turned off by the size. First seeing it totally surprised me, (way too big I thought), and I immediately started looking at every other camera brand, (at B&H), but eventually made my way back to the Sony keiosk and bought it. So glad I did. There were several others on my ship that also had just bought this camera specifically for the trip. I only wish I had had more time to investigate all of it's features.. it's packed. It really does it all and it take some great shots. I especially loved the highspeed burst mode. I got two extra batteries with a dual charger and extra large capacity memory cards and took 10K+ pictures. This camera is great!
Sounds ideal, and also sounds like an amazing trip. It's the ideal camera for that kind of trip, and given the zoom range and all the tech it actually seems pretty compact and light after a few walks with it.
Sold my SLR to buy this camera. Not disappointed, as Kev says, it can do just about anything. Okay low light performance leaves a bit to be desired, but as an allrounder there is nothing better
It's a great camera, would love to see an update and the one feature I would love on it would be for it to shoot timelapses.
Thank you for the recent update to this camera. I miss taking photos with a real camera with tactile buttons over any of the latest cellphones with "the best" image quality which is really just incredible algorithms on such small sensors and lenses. My last camera was the A6600 and the 18-105mm. The fast and accurate auto focus was the best feature to me which is why I want to stay with Sony.
Like most, I was hoping for the Mark V to come out but it looks like it never will as of 2023 and I don't want another mirrorless camera with expensive lenses. So it's good to see a recent review on this camera and that it's still a very viable camera as of 2023.
Thanks for taking the time to comment. It's certainly a viable camera and only really falls behind in some of the latest video high frame rates at 4k etc. But to use as an all rounder it's still probably the best there is.
@@TheWalkingKev I'm in the video business and use professional cameras on a daily basis and I never bought a DSLR or mirrorless camera for it's video qualities.
My one impossible wish with the RX10 IV would be sharpness similar to that on a APS-C or full frame sensor with a fast glass but, I'll easily take the hit in quality for a super zoom camera like this.
Thanks for the video, it reinforced many of the reasons I purchased this (new) a couple of years ago. Now retired, with Covid more behind us than not, we are travelling more and I wanted something with a better zoom than my Sony RX100M3. But when we travel, we don’t check bags - even before the recent travel horror stories! With a similar menu setup that I was used to plus great zoom, reasonable low light capability plus things like zebra and bracketing it does everything I need. Travel normally involves a month at a time - 2500-5000 pictures and then taking the best 10-15% and putting in a memory travel book (LR and Blurb). The results are all we could ask for!! Would love a bigger sensor but not willing to travel with multiple lenses given our travel style. The catalyst to buy this was a safari in Tanzania. Awesome for that with the zoom. Have never regretted buying this. For less rigorous hikes etc, this fits nicely into a “small” sling bag with a coat, batteries, cards and a water bottle. Your video reminded me that IMO this is the only option out there today that mixes size and capability for my needs. Hoping Sony does add a MV, maybe with built in ND filter like the RX100M3, but I have added some magnetic filters that I will trying out in the spring. Cheers.
Thanks, all really valid points about the camera and why it's probably the best all in one you can get. I'd like a new version and the one thing this camera doesn't have is a timelapse function. If it has that - with ability to also make the timelapse in camera - it would be near perfect. Sony don't update features well on older cameras which is a real shame.
I just purchased the Sony RX10iv for an upcoming trip to Tanzania, as well. I can't carry the big lenses and cameras now, so I'm hoping this will be my answer.
@@glendamccaleb847 Absolutely no regrets - perfect camera with the zoom for a safari, especially given the need to travel light. Coming from more of a point and shoot, I will admit that I wish I had spent more time learning how to use the camera better. Things happen pretty quickly around big game while in a Land Rover. I also suggest that you get an extra battery or two.
@@rs779 Thank you. I have a Sony 6400 and the batteries are interchangeable. I think I have about 5. I just got the RX 10 this weekend and have started practicing with it. I use the a6400 with an 18-135mm lens for my primary travel camera, but knew this trip was going to need a lot more reach. I have read wonderful things about it . I'm really excited for the trip!
@@glendamccaleb847 I think you'll be really pleased with it. You'll capture some great images. Hope you have a fantastic trip.
First of all let me compliment you on an outstanding video. Well done! I have owned two of these cameras over the years and shot 1,000s of pictures and videos. It is as handy as a pocket on a shirt. Have also had some of my pictures printed in enlargements and they really look nice. You have to really study the picture to tell the difference between this camera and say the new Sony a7r IV. But then again you are comparing two complete different items on a far different scale. Like comparing steak 🥩 and oranges 🍊. Their both good but yet not the same. I’m planning on picking up my third RX10 IV today. It’s that good of a camera.
Thanks for the kind words, much appreciated. It's a great camera and whilst I do sometimes miss the dynamic range and extra megapixels of my A7rii when shooting landscapes, I then use the RX10IV to zoom into a scene and remember that it's just such a flexible camera.
I'm really hoping they update it soon, but I can't see me swapping it for any other camera until then.
I am amateur and have a Sony RX10 Mk 1 which is my go to camera. It does everything well - far away, close up, stills and video.
The whole RX10 range is good, I think the earlier ones have less zoom range but a much faster lens?
@@TheWalkingKev The lens goes out to 200 but at 2.8 all the way. Also it is not 4K but that does not worry me.
Several years ago, I was looking for a camera to take out on a boat whale watching. I didn't want to take my usual mirrorless gear. The solution was the Sony RX10iv which did a great job. Of course this camera is a good all purpose camera and can be used in any situation.
Yeah, it's an excellent camera for almost any purpose.
I agree entirely with every claim made here . . . I've not changed a lens on a camera since buying my RX10iv several years ago. Fortunately, my video and still needs are well met with it. While low light situations like shooting deer during the evening feeding do present a challenge, it's a small price to pay for the outstanding functionality in all other areas.
It's a great camera. I am probably selling mine soon, I'm downsizing to a Sony HX-99 as it is a lot smaller for longer hikes. I just don't take my RX10IV out much as I've got a drone and other cameras to carry.
I'm sure I'll miss it though.
I love my RX10 lV Kev and particularly like the optical zoom capability. My one gripe, and it's not exclusive to the RX10, is the juddering when panning. It is even present in your lifeboat station clip at the start of your film. I've tried all the tricks, ultra slow pan and various settings but decided, in the end, that panning is almost impossible with smoothness and shy away from that type of filming now. I have found a solution with my GoPros that involves careful configuration and turning many features, like Hypersmooth and linear mode, off. Of course, GoPros are pants when it comes to zoom. They do different tasks and my GoPro is fabulous for mounting on my aeroplane and capturing the Solent and New Forest from 2000 feet, whereas the RX10 is great at bringing animal features or distant detail into sharp focus. I have to admit to even using the RX10 as an excellent telescope on my walks and often use it to identify distant aeroplanes at 30,000 feet 😎. How do you address / adjust the stuttering pan issue? Great film, thanks.
Thanks for the kind comment. I don't tend to pan with this camera TBH. I used it mainly for wildlife or distant scenes and ideally on a tripod. If I need to pan I use my DJI Action 4 which seems to do that nice and smoothly - and removes any need for a gimbal etc.
I'm actually going to sell my RX10 as I just don't use it enough. I've downsized to the HX-99 for any wildlife and action cams for hiking along with my Sony RXO 2 for when I need that 1 inch sensor quality.
Excellent presentation delivered in a relaxed and professional way. I may replace my Coolpix P90 (used on the French Camino 14 years ago) for a portable camera with a decent sensor and quality image. The Sony RX10iv seems to be the job. However, its not for 30 days on the Camino unless I'm there to shoot the journey. I might also consider the Lumix FZ1000 which is lighter (although not at all as light as the P90) and over half the price. Well done.
Thanks for the kind words. It's a great camera but not cheap. Will be interesting to see if they bring out an update soon - it is a little old these days, but still great.
I had the FZ 1000II, Not only is the auto focus weak, the camera is not sealed in any way, so is someone sneezes in the same area code you will need repairs (guess how I know this?) I just bought the RX10iv and it's like night and day
Had it for 5yrs - BEST I have had! No dust on sensor changing lenses like the A77ii I had before which was good.
Don't consider it large to handle & GREAT PICTURES!!
Glad you're enjoying it. I really appreciate the clean sensor after using cameras where I'm constantly changing lenses.
@@TheWalkingKev Thanks.
Could have added I love taking birds in flight and at 600 using "c" it is tack sharp!!
Thanks Kev, great video. In a similar place; I do a lot of long hikes and don’t like to take too much gear for video and photos. I have a Rx100vii which is compact and great to use, but find the 200mm lens a bit too short at times (plus at around 200mm it tends not to be bit grainy at times). This and an action camera could do it all! A used one at a local camera shop right now…
I've recently picked up a used Sony HX-99. It's tiny, 24-720mm zoom and 4k video. Smaller sensor, but in good light it's a great little camera and less than 250g. A lot cheaper than a used RX10IV as well. I'll do a review soon, could be the ultimate ultralight hiking camera.
@@TheWalkingKev nice small camera…I’ve asked the local store to set aside the RX10iv and will look at in a few days. Suspect I will see it as a bit too big, but compared to even my m43 and 100-300 lens (so 600 equivalent) it is likely a bit lighter and faster, albeit a smaller sensor and no time lapse (strange).
@@gordon3988 the lack of time lapse is really frustrating. Sony are really poor at updating cameras via firmware. They just seem to release and abandon. They could add a lot to the RX10IV if they wanted to.
Hi Kev, I can't agree more. I owned different camera's before. I even sold my full frame Nikon Z7 because I'm not the guy to swap lenses during hikes. I do wish that if a Mark5 comes out they'll put in a bigger sensor. Could use a beter dynamic range for stills which I do most of the time. Keep up the good work Kev
Thanks for the kind words. I think they could make two versions of this camera, the 1-inch sensor to maintain or increase the zoom range and a bigger sensor with a more limited range - like the old Sony R1.
the 1 inch sensor is what make the 24-600mm lens work in the first place, its impossible to make that range in bigger sensor camera, as they'd be HUGE.
@The Walking Kev agree, i wish they release an RX1Riii with updated lens and AF system, but its looking less likely by the years. hoping X100V and Q2's popularity make sony woke up.
@@MuhammadKharismawan seems strange that they haven't made it, also seems strange they haven't updated thi camera yet either.
@@TheWalkingKev it seems there's a change in direction after recent years, all three of Sony's Cybershot RX series have stopped being updated, RX100 i can understand as that thing is hitting the limit of a compact, only a faster lens change can improve it, but the RX10 and RX1 sure can have a lot to improve on, latest AF, menu, flip screens, etc are sorely needed.
@@MuhammadKharismawan not to mention how much more they could do with 4k, offer 120 or even 240 frames at 4k and it'd be an awesome video tool.
I enjoy using my DSLR for high quality stills, but I love my GoPro for hiking/camping videos because it barely intrudes on my outdoors experience. It sort of accompanies me, rather than me needing to take care to perfect my shots with it, so it keeps things quick and easy. A GoPro is of course much smaller, lighter, cheaper and more rugged than a weighty DSLR, so I don't think I'll ever take an SLR out for hiking videos. The image quality barely compares between the two though, there is no doubting that!
I've just bought a DJI Action 3 for videos and hiking. Hoping it'll be my bad weather camera and for those trips I don't want to lug heavy gear around!
@@TheWalkingKev I wonder if it might impress you so much that it becomes your sole camera for walks? 🤔
@@joinmeoutdoors maybe. But I still think I'd take my RX10iv because with that lens you can capture so much wildlife and anything else you see. I also love my full frame for landscapes. Totally different beast and with the right lenses you can shoot into the light without flare.
However, capturing a vlog and walk the DJI Action is going to wipe the floor with them!
Another thing with this camera is. I have shot many photo's to see what kind of photo i can get. The fallback to what do I need to do, is shoot in auto. This has got to be the best. I can't say enough good about this camera.
Yes, auto can handle things very well so anyone can get good results from it.
Was that a shot of the Pen-y-Fan walk, also Penarth Pier, and Tenby. My wife and I both have this camera and it look's like we go to the same places. Great to see some one else from South Wales. Nice Vid. Subscribed
Terry
Yes, all those lovely locations! Penarth Pier taken from Cardiff barrage! It's a great camera, covers pretty much any walk you can go on. Really appreciate you subscribing, thanks so much.
I have a rx10m4 and think it is the best. Did have a problem with the card reader tho. New camera or fix. Even tho quite expensive to repair, did that. Honestly I haven't found one to beat this. Only a couple things I would change, but not a necessity would be the view screen. Would be nice to be fully rotatable. I have been at places that big lenses are being used and this exceeds some of them. Hope the 5 if ever comes would be better. It would have to be more like the a9? as far as a sensor goes. Anyway for me right now this is great. John
It would be great to see a 5 with newer sensor and tech. I don't know why they haven't, they could make a heck of a hybrid photo / video camera now.
I have one and I love it, one inch sensor is fine during daylight , you won't hike on night!, its zoom is ideal for wildlife, you can do tele, macro, and also you can do wide angle, it can do 24fps so you can capture birds in movement, it expensive? depends, getting a couple of lenses to get this capabilities on a a6000 will be a couple of thousands dollars, if you have kids, its a great camera, I was tired of struggling to capture my daughter in soccer of the theater
Very true, getting that speed and range on a mirror less camera would cost a lot more than the RX10IV.
My comment is a bit late, I think. I was carriing a lot of Nikon full frame DSLR equipment around during the last years. Now I'm using the RX10 IV. The results are more or less the same, sometimes better (AF) sometimes not. But at the end it's more convenient carriing 2.65 lbs in a backpack than 6 or much more lbs for the full frame camera.
It's a great camera to replace full frame. Does so much well and in most situations the image quality is good enough to not miss a full frame camera. I've now sold mine as my hikes have got longer so I've downsized my camera gear even more.
So here we are in October 2023 with still no sign of a successor to the Mark IV. Like you I have jest sold all my camera gear - Canon 90D plus lenses & also a FUJI X100V. It has been such a liberating experience. I'm now looking to buy this camera as even in 2023 it is still regarded as the best bridge camera in 2023. Prices everywhere are around £1499.00. I plan to use it for all my photography needs. Thanks for a great video.
Thanks for the kind words. I'm actually going to sell mine as I'm downsizing further! They are a lot less used, probably going to get around £800 for it. I just need to get around to listing it.
@@TheWalkingKevwhat’s your main camera if you’re selling this one?
@@mnyre I've got a selection now. A Sony A7CII for hybrid video / photography. A Sony HX-99 as my pocketable super zoom, a Sony RXO for rugged photography / video, a DJI Action 4 and DJI Mini 3 Pro drone.
I have this camera and love it. I agree with everything you said in the video but I feel you buried another feature that makes it great - 250fps slomo at 1080p that actually LOOKS fantastic. Combine that slomo with the long lens for animals/birds/moving water… it has that string to its bow too.
Thanks for adding that. I have only used it in 4K so haven't played with that, but I think I'll have to now!
@@TheWalkingKev oooh you’re in for a treat!
Some questions on this camera, please:
1. Gets blacked out screen on viewfinder /or lcd when wearing polarized sunglasses?
2. ATG's 2.4GHz TTL using ATG/Jinbei/Orlit/Rollei/Westcott/Profoto lights?
3. What is the max normal flash sync?
4. Using WiFi to Android phone or tablet (live-view screen) , were you able to view image (live-view screen) on viewfinder or lcd?
5. Can it zoom in or out during when taking a shot in slow shutter speed?
1, don't know, I don't wear polarized sunglasses.
2, you'd be better off referring to Sony website / camera manual. I don't use any kind of flash.
3, as above.
4, don't know, not a function I've used.
5, good question, I don't know either I'm afraid, I've never tried it. My suspicion would be no, but I might try this out and get back to you.
No problems with polarized glasses
Ich besitze sie auch und bin recht zufrieden, sie kann nicht alles, aber Blitzen mit TTL bei voller Sonne zum Aufhellen ist einfach prima. Leider fehlt ihr das bewegliche HF-Display welches ich für die Macrofotos in Bodennähe brauche.
Es ist eine großartige Kamera und kann fast alles, aber nicht ganz so, wie Sie sagen.
I see you didn't include the 'sand dune' shot! Sounds like a great camera, maybe I should should trade in all my camera gear for one...
That's pretty much what I did. One camera that can do it all, well. Grab and go.
Looking at upgrading my Panasonic FZ300 to a Sony A7, but I don't want to lose my zoom capabilities. I appreciate you making this video, thank you!!!
As someone who owns an A7RII and an RX10IV I'm finding I'm just taking the RX10IV out with me most of the time now. I'm actually pondering whether to sell the A7RII, but for landscapes with my vintage glass it is still superb.
What is the maximum clip length this camera can shoot in 4K.? Will it heat up and stop in between whilst recording continuous?
I don't know if anyone has tested this, but it is normally a test that video making channels do. I've recorded some pretty lengthy clips with this camera with no overheating and never had any warnings at all. It's got a decent sized body so maybe heat dissipates through that well.
Regarding the Dragongfly macro shot, was that at 600mm?
I think so. It focuses really close at 24mm and then at 600mm so it's a very flexible lens.
I used to desire that camera, but for a while I've been using a Tamron 18-400 on an APS-C Canon body and I feel I'm covered in all situations (maybe except the extreme wide end)
That is the other option, APS-C will offer better dynamic range and low light performance.
except those APS-C lenses are a stop or two slower than RX10's. Tamron is 3.5 to 6.3. So in low-light the results would probably be similar to the faster lens on smaller sensor. @@TheWalkingKev
@@radiozelaza that's a good point.
I'd buy another if they'd upgrade the sensor. I'd still carry the extra weight and size a bigger sensor would give it.
Sadly I'm not sure if Sony have any desire to launch any new version of this camera. Such as shame.
I have a RX100 M7 right now, so thinking about change to rx10 m4? I know it just like a superzoom version rx100 m6.
It should be roughly equivalent in most technical ways, but a much bigger camera with a much more flexible zoom range.
@@TheWalkingKev If there was a price discount on black friday i would consider it, i was planning to buy a DSLR but the length and weight of the telephoto lens made me abandon that idea.
A mark V has been rumored for years.
Still got my fingers crossed for one with 120fps 4k or above!
Hello there. First of all, great video and I am happy for having found your channel. I would like to ask you a question because it is what I am doing with my oldie SONY DSC HX400V, I have a little power bank that I bring with me to stop worring about battery life, what I mean is, I use my oldie Sony connected all the time with my powerbank through a USB cable and I keep shooting and shoting without changing battery or whatsoever, it works great in this way and, the power bank takes until one week to recharge, that means that I can be shootting pictures for one week using the electricity offered from my little powerbank connected through a USB Micro to the camera! having said that, hdoes this Sony have the option to be connected to a charger directly from the wall to charge the battery or in my case, to charge the camera through the USB port with a powerbank! This is very important for me because I just want to have only one battery, I need no more than one, so, being able to feed my Sony all the time, is a priority to me! If you understood what I meant, I beg you to give me an answer if you can! I send you many greetings from Germany! Keep it up! Alfredo ps. It has surprised me to know that my oldy has GPS, this one, no, but, nothing too important!
I think you can charge via USB as the external battery charger for this camera is an extra. So you should be able to plug a battery bank in to charge it. I never have though as I had loads of batteries for it.
@@TheWalkingKev well, you have learned something from me and that is nice. I have been using my Tablet OUKITEL RT7 TITAN as my power generator for my old Sony, it has a very big battery capacity of more than 32 000 mAp and shooting more than 2 weeks connected direct to the tablet without charging anything any more for so long, also, the same using my Tank 3 phone from Unihertz with 23000 mA of capacity, however both of them are too heavy to transport and that is why I bought a little power bank very light in weight which as I said, let me shoot pictures for at least 1 week without worries at all. I only use one battery though, I need nothing more than 1 battery, please, try to test if it is possible to do the same with the SONY VI and inform back, thank you so much for your great videos and greetings from Germany. Alfredo
Can you share the make/model of the camera bag? I have the RX10 IV, having a hard time finding a good bag for it.
I'll have a look when I get home and let you know. It's a Tamrac, but they have model numbers sewn into the bag so I'll be able to give you the exact model later.
Apologies for the late reply. Bag is a Tamrac 5627.
Do you run ND filters on it for filming?
No, I've never used ND filters on it. I've just got the Carl Zeiss protective filter on it.
What sling bag are you using? I like that it is smaller.
Hi, It is a Tamrac 5627. Offers enough room to have the camera in with the hood one, several batteries and memory cards etc. Really good bag, wears well and I've used for hundreds of miles without issue - it does not have a raincover though. It is water-resistant but not waterproof.
Images straight out from camera? Any editing?
Just auto-tuned in editing software.
Some very nice shots. But ugh on the size and weight for hiking - 2.4 lbs? Holy crap. If you don't need 600mm and don't want to lug something that huge try the Sony RX100 VII. It's soooo much smaller and lighter, still has a 1" sensor and f2.8 at 24mm. It a has decent zoom at 200mm. I personally don't really see the need for 600 on most hikes because the wildlife I see on trail is either comfortable with humans and hangs relatively close or is non-existent because there are too many people (i.e., at nearly every National Park).
Funnily enough I'm probably going to sell it now. I've bought the tiny Sony HX-99 which shoots 4k and is 24-720mm - only has a small sensor though.
I've also bought the Sony RXO 2 which has the same sensor as the RX100 series but is tiny, waterproof and rugged. Really enjoying it so far.
Good video.. Of course i am also a fan of RX 10 IV But still i am not owned bcs of thinking again and again.. Now i am 90% confirmed.. Its Really the best all rounder.. Whether sealed best optics with 24 - 600 👍 thank you.
At this moment in time it's still the best around in my opinion. I'll love it if they brought out a Mk5 with better autofocus and AI tech, but haven't seen any indication that they will.
In there anything better then this sony Bridge? Canon, Nikon, or other as bridge? Thanks
I don't think so. No company - as far as I know - has released a camera in this range for a while now. Bridge cameras seem to have gone out of fashion. I'd like Sony to release an updated version of this camera, but I haven't heard any rumours that they will.
@@TheWalkingKev ahh ok ok, well i will look for a use one. I don't get why its out of fashion is so great in my opinion.😊 Thanks .
I sold my Nikon D810 and 2 fixed f2.8 24-70 & 70-200 lenses to buy this RX10IV. Unfortunatley once youve had gear like that, you cant go back. The RX10 was never sharp compared to my old gear & ISO 400 plus was unusable so the hype on the sensor of this camera seems false to me. However, yes, great having a camera where you dont need to change lenses, I hate it. I now sold my RX10 & gone back to a Sony A7RV & 24-70 & 70-200 GM II lenses.
I've used this alongside an A72 and A7R2 and it seemed solid enough for me in terms of sharpness and ISO performance as long as you're being realistic given the much smaller sensor.
I've since sold my RX10 in favour of the tiny RXO 2 and a A7CII because I'm doing a lot more video these days and not so much random wildlife photography.
Thanks for your input, for some it's going to be really hard sacrificing the quality of full frame sensors and that's understandable.
@@TheWalkingKev I do miss this camera with the ability just to take those great long shots. But for me, once having a great SLR with the f2.8 lenses, I could just never forget how amazingly sharp with low DOF shots were, I was constantley comparing them.
@@theshakez I've found that using my A7CII, images look completely different with the DOF.
@@TheWalkingKev Yes, that’s something I never knew. The f values are completely different on fixed lens cameras to SLR lenses. So, if you took a close-up picture at f2.8 with the RX10 then compare that to an SLR f2.8 pic the DOF is completely different. f2.8 on the RX10 is probably the equivalent of say f9 DOF on an SLR. So, you get the "speed" of f2.8 but not the DOF equivalent.
Is the image edited or straight out from camera?
I apply basic colour correction (auto) in Adobe Lightroom, but that's it for images.
it would be my dream camera if it had better stabe, 10bit and a floppy screen. I would settle for just better stabe.
They could do so much if they ever launched a Mk5... Stabilisation could be a lot better for video that's for certain.
@@TheWalkingKev I sold my iv a couple of years ago and have gone down a rabbit hole to replace it. I use an a7siii with a 400mm gm lens but that’s a large setup. I even bought a Panasonic handycam x2000. While it has great stabe, the image on the rx10 is better even though it’s only 8 bit!
@@theinfinate I've got a Sony A7RII that I've used with some big glass, but the 4k on the RX10IV is really good and it's very compact for the range.
I could get it for 1200 right now. Can't decide. 😕
It all depends on what you currently have, what you want it for and how much you think you'd use it. It's still the best bridge camera you can get and the range means it really can do it all.
had one of these cameras and was so disappointed in the auto focus etc I sold it. I guess some like me are just destined to carry a DLSR and the weight of lens
That surprises me as the autofocus is good on it in my experience. It's never really let me down.
@@TheWalkingKev It works good on most situations but when trying to take pics of wildlife amongst trees or other objects the focus grabs everything but the subject you want
@@chuckspani ah yes, you need to be on spot focus and trying to hold the wildlife right at that spot. Before this camera I largely manual focused so avoided that issue.
They take amazing pictures when you get the subject in focus and for birds the auto focus is insanely fast! Just wasnt for me.
@@TheWalkingKev
Looks like Tenby
Yep, a couple of shots from Tenby. Lovely place to visit.
I still use my RX10 MKII when out and about. I love the slow motion video it offers.
So if you can get past the watermark, this is what the mkii can do, so the options and longer lens the mkiv offers would be great.
BTW, I have heard the MKV is coming out.... for at least the last 3 years... so likely the MKIV is where it's going to be for the foreseeable.
czcams.com/video/-a_gvkmE9SY/video.html
The MKIV has amazing autofocus which makes it worthwhile over the MKiii. A MKV would be very interesting but as you said, lots of talk but nothing solid!
I'll have a look at your video now...
I have this camera and no matter what I do I can’t get these shots close up or far away. I can still get amazing shots and tips though ? Maybe something is wrong with it ??
It only focuses closely at different zoom levels. For example, it focuses really closely at 24mm (widest angle) but then as you zoom in it can't focus that closely. However, when you get to 600mm it focuses quite closely again - for things like butterflies etc.
@@TheWalkingKev that helps so much thank you ! Explains why sometimes I can get it and other times I can’t ! I assumed it was something like that but did know what focal lengths it could be
@@rainecoblentz5094 it can focus really closely at 24mm, it's such a flexible camera. At 600mm it is great for bugs and stuff.
Try to add the clear image zoom for even more close up fun experiences.
@@allenthomas4280 works particularly well in movie mode!
Great Camera but not a great Walking (hiking) Camera: why do I have that opinion?
I’ve carried one, not because I wanted to but because my wife didn’t enjoy carrying her camera, it is to big and heavy; my weapon of choice for hiking is the RX100 VII and with CIZ I get 400mm.
Great camera, great lens, but never goes hiking.
Funnily enough I'm swapping this camera for the tiny Sony HX-99 as that is tiny and light but has a bigger zoom. Image quality takes a hit, but at least it is easy to carry!
@@TheWalkingKev 👍 - I love my RX100, goes on the belt and always there 1” sensor and another Zeiss lens; obviously has its limitations too, most gains come with compromises.
@@stuartferguson7947 I've got a little Sony RXO 2 with that sensor to give me some good image quality and also a rugged, waterproof camera for hiking. A good lightweight partner for the tiny HX-99 zoom.
Best for hiking???? This thing is huge. Who wants to lug such a huge camera around on a hike?
I've hiked many miles with this camera because of what it offers. Huge range, quick autofocus and image quality far superior to compact super zooms. But, yes, for some it will be too big and heavy to consider. I've eventually swapped it for the tiny Sony HX-99, but I miss the image quality of the RX10IV.
good for me rx10m4
I guess you want to hike more than take pictures then. If one hikes to take pictures, then this camera would be great.
@@hansa2026 yes, and it's worth the weight for the flexibility.
@@hansa2026 no there are fantastic smaller options than are just as good or almost as good
Love Mine no more carrying all the lenses around
I've recently been leaving my full frame camera at home completely. I was using that just for landscapes, but saving weight and just taking the RX10 is good.
Don't know if its just the youtube conversion or what, but the video at the start is weird and jittery.
Hmmm... no-one else seems to have noticed that. I'll have to have a nose again and see if I can notice anything.
How much
Get them used for around £800...
Battery life though, I guess if you pack a battery belt on you?
Battery life is actually pretty solid on it. I've got plenty of spare batteries for it and I'll carry a few if I think I'll be needing them. Even video in 4k battery life is good. I've noticed my A7RII drains batteries significantly faster.
CAMERA rx 10 iv.
Yes, that's the one.
Sony RX10 IV at 128,00 ISO, Full HD @120fps converted to 24fps: czcams.com/video/9OCDZA8H_bM/video.html
Very nice.