Denial | I Am Not A Racist | Film Clip | Own it on Digital, Blu-ray & DVD
Vložit
- čas přidán 27. 08. 2024
- Subscribe to Our Channel: uni.pictures/yt...
Website: www.uphe.com/m...
Film Synopsis:
Oscar® winner Rachel Weisz stars in this powerful true story based on the acclaimed book, Denial: Holocaust History on Trial. When Deborah Lipstadt (Weisz) speaks out against Holocaust denier David Irving (Timothy Spall) over his falsification of history, she discovers that the stakes are higher than ever in the battle for historical truth. Now faced with a libel lawsuit in British court, Lipstadt and her attorney (Tom Wilkinson) have the heavy burden of proving that the Holocaust actually happened, in a riveting legal fight with stunning consequences.
About: The Universal Pictures Home Entertainment channel features trailers, film clips and Blu-ray/DVD bonus feature clips from all your favorite movies and TV shows. Subscribe to our channel to keep up on all the latest releases. Sign-up to receive updates, sneak peeks and offers here: uni.pictures/em...
Denial | I Am Not A Racist | Film Clip | Own it on Digital, Blu-ray & DVD
Fun fact, Deborah Lipstadt looks nothing like Rachael Weisz and David Irving looks nothing like Timothy Spall.
Fun fact, it's called "acting."
@@vikingsong2068 tee hee hee, you started with “fun fact” just like I did
Irving was such a gentleman, Lipstadt looks like a gremlin
They are using lookism and the halo effect to make irving look bad and deborah look good
@@vikingsong2068 fun fact, it's called propaganda
If he's not a racist, I'm curious to know what His definition of a racist Is.
A racist is someone who wrongly believes that certain groups of people are quote on quote better or inferior than other groups.
@@jessicafournerat3804 I know, which is what he’s blatantly doing, though he denies being a racist. so if he’s not a racist, what exactly Is His definition of the word then. or is he just…in denial-
He is not a racist! The man hates everybody the same
Perhaps he can’t spell “racist”.
Personal preference
The amount of anti-semitic and Holocaust deniers in this comment section is crazy to me
Why?
Yeah, it's crazy. There are a lot of misguided and misinformed people here. And the really crazy thing is that almost all of them have never actually studied the period properly. And by studied, I don't mean some dark web blog posts... I mean real study.
Well, that's these comments logs for you, .. . ANYONE can express their opinion in them. They aren't like those television talk shows where only those whose opinions and statements echo yours are allowed. So then tuff titty for you I guess.
I think your just mad because you don't control these YT comments logs, .. . like you already control the REST of the media (mainstream television, print media, and the Hollywood movie industry).
Explain the soccer games
Yet again, the Holocaust deniers assemble in the comments section. Please leave history to proper historians and those who can differentiate historical fact from paranoid conspiratorial thinking. Actually go to a university-educated historian and they will clear up your confusion very quickly.
The 'proper historians' who did not even bother to look for primary sources as they were dying out, choosing instead to build their careers regurgitating books written by other historians ad nauseum as proof of their authority in the topic. Not that it matters since the very same experts eventually end up changing the facts on their own, unchallenged as long as the narrative remains the same, while saying the very same thing that saying the previous day would have constituted a hate crime on several countries.
David Irving and revisionists are proper historians
@@GW_01 no, they're not... They write about history but they're not academic historians.
@@AM-jo3pn So a piece of paper giving to you by people with that same piece of paper determines your knowledge? Ok then.
@@GW_01 No, it's about the craft of a historian. The reason Irving lost the trial was because it was proven over and over again that he did not use historical evidence properly and objectively. This violates the essence of what historians do and how they handle the past. It was a product of the fact that he was not a properly trained historian and was not engaging in the kind of careful methods that one finds in the academy. Another very important part of academia is peer review. It is rigorous and keeps the standards very high, as they should be. Irving, and others like him, don't stand up to such scrutiny.
"But I'm not a racist"
"Look at the words on the page."
Powerful.
The Law your username is “The Law”, so you shouldn’t be saying “cringe”.
Super cringe. By these standards anyone who has ever in their lifetime told a JOKE with a racial element within is a "racist". By these standards 99.9% of the population is "racist".
But I thought that JEWS weren't supposed to be a race? .. . THAT is what many of THEM say themselves. They seem to kinda change their minds back and forth on THAT one.
@@danielbertrand6675 u should sorround yourself with better people cause goddamn
When people say "I'm not a racist BUT" what they mean is "I am a racist AND".
Surely most people are racist to some degree?
No not true, history isn't as kind as you wish it was
In any sentence “but” does negate what comes before it, doesn’t it?
Yep. He described Britain as letting in 'racial sludge' but he's not racist. 🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
@@Goodiesfanful no. Linguistics is a bit beyond you.
Truth fears no investigation.
What if Irving questioned the Holodomor????Would they sue him??Answer NO!!!!
He sued them dumbass
@@ssnful123 So what????Do they have laws against denial or not????Thats the point i am making.Maybe this time its the other way around.But they put Zundel in court they put Haverbeck in court etc etc.....
Irving sued Lipstadt for libel, not the other way around. British libel law puts the onus of the person being sued not the person bringing the libel case.
@@hannahr0071 Dont you see my second comment???
@@robertovalero6186 Point is they didn't sue him for the Holocaust denial, so why would they sue him for denying another genocide? And for your information: the EU allows countries to forbid all genocide denials under the anti-racism law. For example: you can't deny the Armenian genocide in certain places.
Should of kept in his speech he gave about being a so called "racist" "Mr Rampton i would define what you call racism as patriotism." "How would you define patriotism?" "Patriotism is respect for the country that has been handed down to you by your parents and their parents" "And what country is that Mr Irving?" "Mr Rampton, sometimes I have the dream i can go to heath row airport and board a 747 and fly for over 10 hours and land back in England as it was back in the 1950s." "Mr Irving, what kind of England would that be." "Mr rampton, let me put it like this. If the soldiers who stormed the beaches in Normandy June 1944 could see England as it is today, they would't of gone 40 yards up that beach."
louis French President Macron once said Nationalism is a betrayal of Patriotism.
@@eaglesfan226 what a retarded quote from a neo-liberal shill whos one of the worse presidents in recent history
Well, deleting my comment surely was a great feat for free speech, wasn't it, you fucking coward?
But I thought that JEWS weren't supposed to be a race? .. . THAT is what many of THEM say themselves. They seem to change their minds back and forth on THAT one.
Cry harder, Nazi.
In this trial, Irving accidentally addressed the judge as "Mein Fuhrer", and not "Your Honour".
You have no sense of humour.
@@stephengallagher2209 You have no brain.
After he lost this case Irving was required to pay the trial costs. He was driven into bankruptcy and lost his house.
Before Irving took this to court and represented himself, he should have more thoroughly reviewed the legal requirements and ramifications if things didn’t work out. But who represents himself in court has a fool for a client.
And nothing of value was lost
Serves him right.
He’s been imprisoned (prosecuted under German law, which makes Holocaust denial a criminal offence) and also banned from several countries, including mine (thank goodness).
Good
thats fantastic
Got to love the choice of actor and actress for these two parts. David Irving is a very handsome man yet they pick Timmy Spall to play him. And of course the beautiful Rachel Weisz to play Lipstadt.
🤣🤣🤣
immediately thought the same, but normies will fall for it lost as they are…
Well beauty is subjective, but who were you expecting to play Irving? Di Caprio?
@@1996koke well, a younger and thinner Robbie Coltrane would've been perfect for irving. As for lipstadt, she was a crow even in her youth but they've been very complimentary with her actress!!
@@George-nv1ri yeah I agree that another actress should have played lipstadt but the actor they chose for Irving is not that different from how Irving actually looks
It must be true if Hollywood made it !
Ikr
Hollywood didn't make it.
@@louisjeffs5317 movie was produced by participant media based out of hollywood co produced with the bbc. Don't come at me bro
@@louisjeffs5317 Yes it was. It's not some independent film made on the fringe by some renegade maverick artist. It's a corporate production.
@@coleslaw9181 how does that make it 'Hollywood'?
Tom Wilkinson and Timothy Spall. Two of the finest British actors of this or any other generation.
Timothy Spall is brilliant. He looks at the judge with this superior, and yet engaging smile as if to say, "Can you believe how childish these people are... luckliy, you and I are smart enough to see through their ignorance." I've seen people try this trick in real life, and this actor brings that to life so well.
Why would someone Keep fighting that the sky is blue ?
Because sometimes the sky is gray. Sometimes red.
Why would someone make it illegal to say the sky is blue?
@@yingyang1008 now that is an Interesting question. They Censored Jesus.. so this censorship makes sense.
Does denying the sky is blue lead to the dehumanization and slaughter of other people? Does it have real world consequences? Does it spit in the face of survivors of human atrocity?
Tom Wilkinson and Andrew Scott were brilliant in this.
wow this movie totally convinced me it happened
That’s good imaginative script writing for you
He was also arrested in Austria for Holocaust denial
Those who say the Holocaust was a fake must have a screw loose.
@@West_Coast_Mainline Which should not ever be a thing
@@LukeLovesRose should be
As a Hungarian I proudly stand with David Irving. He is the most truthful Historian of our time. God bless you and you work.
Go go hell !!!!!!!!
Go to hell !!!!!!!
So brave and progressive.Fighting a dead ideology condemned by all.U are a peace of gold.
@@theiskito99 Really an ad hominem attack? Why? Because you can't debate facts with out getting angry and resort to name calling like a child.
@@johnnyorlando9601 Typical leftist. Just angry because someone disagrees with you.
Thank you for everything that you've done for us, Mr Irving.
Would you care to explain?
By everything do you mean nothing? He's provided nothing that explains how the Holocaust never happened other than him not seeing a hole in a gas chamber roof.
@@anniebaker6763 he doesn't need to
@@Sandwich13455 apparently he does. Besides, I don’t like Holocaust deniers. In fact, I don’t take kindly to KKK sympathizers.
I am not a racist?
Said every racist ever
Are you a racist, Travis?
Racist
Maybe YUO'RE one yourself, and you just don't know it.
Followed by the word "but" in 99% of cases
I though JEWS weren't supposed to be a RACE in the first place.
Timothy Spall as Irving says "but I'm not a racist" with the almost dumbfounded earnestness of someone who's deluded enough to actually believe it.
Holocaust deniers often say they are not deniers either; they’re “revisionists” or some other modifier; in the case of one denier I encountered, it was “just sceptical”. Or they put up denial stuff like “One Third of the Holocaust” on CZcams under the banner of free speech along with disclaimers they are deniers.
You can convince yourself of anything when you try.
It’s amazing what people can delude themselves into saying and even believing because they won’t accept anything that contradicts what they believe is true. It’s called cognitive dissonance. You see it a lot in prosecutors when they’re told there’s been a miscarriage of justice.
All of these dialogue came from the record of the trial
@@Goodiesfanful absolutely - I mean just look at the Holocaust story.
video length is 333
Illuminati Confirmed!
@@SwfanredLotr 🙄
Wow!
@@mightyea such coincidence, much wow
I actually laughed out loud when he said “but I’m not a racist”.
The irony is, Irving seems to have withdrawn from Holocaust denial, or is at least unable to show his face there again. Now that did surprise me. Wonders will never cease.
I don't think he has ever actually denied it publicly
@@yingyang1008 he sort of did to an Austrian jury. Mind you, he was facing jail time under Austria’s anti-Holocaust denial laws. Now he seems to have fallen off the radar or something. Well, good riddance anyway.
@@Goodiesfanful I think it was for something he wrote 20 years before the trial, while not even in Austria
It's hard to blur the line because apparently if you question one little thing about it, you are a Nazi? 🤔🤔
The enemy got to him. They threatened him and or his freedom. That's all they have to do to turn people.
Not Ernst Zundel though
Love the way Hollywood has chosen a week chinned actor for Irving and a young good looking actress in place of the old boot she was.
It should be noted that the ‘experts’ she used were paid around £100,000 each for their testimonies.
I’d like to see this film in full. These two are good actors.
Hi David!
@@OwenAdams Good day!
@@strontiumstargazer103 exactly... the entire trial was a facade and shrouded in lies and corruption
@@daveedesanta6318 I bet the film omits these aspects.
@@strontiumstargazer103 Of course, it's mean anti fascist conspiracy. Go figure.
Typical of David Irving to name his daughter Jessica when, in Shakespearean literature where the name originated, Jessica betrayed her Jewish father by stealing his gold, betraying his trust, and denouncing his faith.
I'm not sure he thought that deeply into it
You will never be a woman
@@thebuckmaster6497 I don’t recall asking you.
@@1andonlyzara I don't recall you being a woman
@@thebuckmaster6497 racists are really the worst kind of human beings.
Disgusting
David Irving is a hero of truth and nothing less than a hero
Your jokes need work.
He lost. He lost, in fact, so catastrophically that he has never recovered from this utter humiliation. You seem to have rather low standards.
@@fadej.3511 This is a simple statement of fact: Irving lost. He lost catastrophically badly. I suggest you somehow learn to live with that simple, undeniable fact.
@@marcjones1411 a little louder for the nazis in the back xd
A zero of the truth and nothing less than a zero more like.
But I thought that JEWS weren't supposed to be a race? .. . THAT is what many of THEM say themselves. They seem to kinda change their minds back and forth about THAT one.
@@ryublueblanka Well, I was kinda referring to the VIDEO here. The words "race" "racism" and "racist" were used like several times in IT as I recall.
@@ryublueblanka Jews are internationally considered simultaneously as a religious, national and ethnic group. One can be one or all of those depending on your background. I have no views on Zionism but it is not the reason why Irving sided with denial.
@@AM-jo3pn I don't think you recognize the power of the powers that be. The manipulation from the ground up that you and I have been raised on. The more you research and dig and investigate the more it becomes clear. Start breaking down your statements...that Jews can be anything and everything or one or the other. Really break down what you are saying...have you ever gone to the opposing side of your arguments? Have you ever researched as hard for the other side of the coin as you have your own side? Until you do that you can't begin to have a true understanding
@@coleslaw9181 Not to mention in the VERY TITTLE.
@@AM-jo3pn since it's coming from you and Lipstadt...I wonder if Elvis may actually be alive 🤔
I know what I said confused you so much that you rendered it irrelevant. It's inconceivable to people like you to even consider the fact that you may be wrong about a lot of things. Your generalization of the real world as Jewish global conspiracy is ridiculous. If you choose to keep your head buried in the sand that's up to you...just know there is another side of the coin for you to take a look at someday. Remember this...there are actually 3 sides to a coin
3:20 Pewdiepie after saying the N word and dissing millions of Indians.
Those are some sick beats
I agree! I'll be singing it wherever I go!
@@sneakyckyle9622 Hey how are ya
@@universome511 very good, thank you!
Kanye loves David Irving.
Says a lot about both of them.
You can go look at the transcript and, aside from some crosstalk, it’s a verbatim transcript
This is a very good film. And all the more so that it brings Nazis out of the woodwork like wasps.
FredFuchs77 Example provided by the commentor in this thread.
It shows how frightened they are and how damaging it was to their cause.
@@5Mariner Whose?
@@fds7476 The Neo-Nazis on CZcams who deny the Holocaust.
@@5Mariner LOL. Neo-Nazis? Aren't those the skinhead assholes that brand themselves with the swastika?? We're just truth-seekers. Only guilty cowards would be so threatened by people seeking the truth.
Just last night I watched Tom Wilkinson playing a zealous British lawyer defending corrupt police in In The Name Of The Father with the same zeal. Such a fucking good actor!
Most racists declare: "I am not a racist!".
Great film.
I am racist
@@MausOfTheHouse Just moves you one rung lower on the evolutionary ladder.
@@mitchrichards1532 Oh but it does the opposite in fact; having an in-group preference is an evolutionary trait that has made humans the beings that they are
@@MausOfTheHouse More like engaging in delusional BS to make you think your special is a psychological crutch for the insecure and incompetent. Kind of proves my earlier statement.
@@mitchrichards1532 *You're and it's not delusional BS. It's something called the Theory of Evolution. Don't you believe in it? If so, then you support the possibility of there being some races that are less developed than others in some regards.
“I am not a racist!”
Yeah, right.
Is it worthy of a film whether he is or not?
@@yingyang1008 it is a film.
@@Goodiesfanful Strange topic for a film no? A libel trial......
@@Goodiesfanful It's a true story.
@@yingyang1008 Isn't it defamation?
He says he isn't racist when it's plain to see that he is. In the end, after he loses, he tells an interviewer that the verdict favoured him. And he looks genuinely puzzled when the interviewer asks him if he'll stop his denial now. I wonder if all of this shows that he is insane.
They couldn't prove him wrong factually in court so they had to attack his character.
Did you watch the movie? They did disprove him factually
@@emilystark3271 Imagine getting your knowledge of history from a movie...
@@emilystark3271 where was he proved wrong factually?
@Daniel you've never kissed a girl
@@emilystark3271 Hello ? Any responses here ?
God Bless Mr. Irving. I’ve had the pleasure of emailing him. The Total Truth or nothing at all!
You and Irving can rot in Hell
Well, since Jesus is Jewish I doubt Mr. Irving would appreciate His blessing very much. And bringing up God's name, who teaches us to love our neighbour shows you know absolutely nothing about Him
Let me adjust my previous comment then, since Apollo is a well-known bisexual I doubt Irving would want his blessing either... And I agree some people want nothing more than our love and don't deserve it and Mr. Erving is one of them.@@duncan2993
@@duncan2993if Irving cared about truth then he wouldn’t have made things up
@@Raine749The judge in the Lipstadt Trial found that Irving made 7 mistakes in 30 books. That’s pretty good, to say the least. Another historian said during the trial that no other historian had faced the line by line scrutiny that Irving did, and if they did their work would crumble. A different judge said that he would’ve rules in Irving’s favor. Maybe you should educate yourself on what Irving has written and said instead of basing your opinions on what a Hollywood film relays to you.
Unimpressed with the censorship taking place with these comments. My previous comment added several hours ago which was innocuous and only alerted readers that Irv ing is very ill and bed ridden and not likely to recover, and has ceased his life;s work, was taken off straight away. Maybe Irv ing has something when he used to talk about the traditional enemies of freedom of speech. Feb 2024.
very similar to doctors' denial of any discrimination.. That is why they call them shrinks.
World at war is the only series worth watching. It's old enough to have talking heads on it, like speer, that were actually there.
the comments are appalling wtf is wrong with people
Your comment is appalling.
We’re sick and tired of manipulation that’s what’s wrong :))
Nobody cares what appalls you asshat.
What is wrong with these people who make these appalling comments? I would say it is the same thing that caused the Holocaust in the first place and would do it again given half the chance.
Roman Polanski , maxwell, Epstein, Weinstein…. Approve of your world view. Nice comment
Very low quality propaganda, this film. If this is the best they can do to tarnish the truth, then we will win.
Read the trial transcript. You lost in 1945 and you have never recovered from that.
It's not propaganda, it's what really happened. Irving sued for libel and lost. The video clips are based on real footage of him.
@@marcjones1411 Do you have the source to read the transcript?
Propaganda? The Holocaust happened. Get over it
A waste of money. Tgsnt way better.
Absolutely.
@@julien.s2002 Facist
Where can I FIND that movie?
It's on Hulu!
It's a RECENT COMERCIAL MAINSTREAM MAJOR HOLLYWOOD-MADE movie you tool. It isn't rare or elusive at all.
@@creepyskulldini581 Hmm. Aside from a stupid desire to pick a fight, what was your stupid reason for being rude and stupid, tool?
Where do you find OTHER recent major movies? .. . the theaters, Amazon, Netflix, Hulu, the redbox, probably the same for this one.
I think you had already beat me to STUPID with your opening comment.
Casting Weis as Lupstadt is ridiculous
True 😂 imagine if the pit the real crow in the pic , nobody would of been interested
That dude should've been on the Joyner Lucas album
Kinda makes you want to read his books - none of them are really about the holocaust though
Can someone explain what tab ten is to me, please?
0:34I ALWAYS LOVE HOW THE SUBTLY USE BLACK PEOPLE ISSUES TO PUSH WOMEN RIGHTS AND GAY RIGHTS😐😑
This movie smells of small hats.
david irving has been interviewed many times
And he’s been banned from many countries.
@@Goodiesfanful Not just banned, he was arrested in Austria because Holocaust denial is illegal there.
@@gezzarandom
If it were truly so obvious and without a shred of doubt, why is questioning it illegal? This always gets me. Nothing else in history is off limits.
@@seppshlllearningcenter419 That's because you're a racist. Real people do not find you acceptable. Go cry in your hole.
@@psycher7 lol what?
Some of his books sell for upwards of 500$. Lipstadt's books are worth as much as toilet paper, literally.
👍👍👍
Dr. Lipstadt has written 8 critically acclaimed books on the Holocaust, Irving has none. The trial was about? No one with an open and reasonable mind is buying Irving's tainted and distorted views.
@@mitchrichards1532 Read more, don't be fooled.
@@GlossaME Read what exactly? Irving's fake news? I read his Dresden book and it was based upon known false evidence and full bad info and analysis. He's not a real Historian, he's more of a historical fiction writer.
@@mitchrichards1532 Ok my man, if you don't see it with your eyes there is no point convincing you otherwise. Keep gulping the propaganda
I've seen him in person and he looked better than Timothy Spall, no disrespect to the actor.
And I've seen videos of Debbie L. Nothing like Rachel Weisz
Am I wrong for wanting to live in 1950's America or prior?? Apparently I'm a racist and didn't know it lol 🤔🤔😂
If you wanna live in 1950s america BEUCASE of segregation and "majority whiteness" then yes, you are racist.
Why do you wanna live in 1950s America?
RIP TW
The truth is no defence.
The idea that you can't question a historical event is abhorrent. To jail someone for it, or at last putting them on trial for it, is a smack in the face of academia and unfettered historic/scientifuc debate.
If you want to know who rules you, ask who you can't criticize...indeed🙃
It’s crazy that they don’t want you to question a an event that until this day has caused us to be In turmoil with the Middle East.
We can question anything that continues to cost us money and continues to cause bloodshed
LMAO, put on trial??? Irving was the one who started the issue with HIS lawsuit against Dr. Lipstadt. She proved beyond doubt that what she said about Irving was true.
@@mitchrichards1532 She called him an antisemite and she did not prove that. Kindly take your ziinist self and go cease to exist.
Bro you know it was a trial of libel in which HE sued someone for debunking him right? 🤦♂️ Fucking morons man.
Amen brother
I am 💪 😎
GOD BLESS DAVID IRVING!
Irving’s a hack
Whether it's racist or not, he should be allowed to speak. Freedom of speech means all speech--racist, or otherwise. It's a shame the UK has strayed so far away from their very own tradition of liberty.
There are many things people say to which I'm offended by, but they have every right to say such things.
Zack Edwards You should watch the movie. You’ll realize that the point of this trial was to prove that he’s a racist because that is the burden of proof the UK Courts require to defend against libel. He’s got every right to say whatever he likes. He doesn’t then get to cry foul when people see him as a racist for saying them. If he gets to say what he wants, she gets the same freedom.
He sued *her*. He brought a defamation suit against her for her calling him a racist, a Hitler apologist, and a falsifier of history. And he did it in England, specifically because the burden of proof would be on *her*, to prove that what she said was true.
"Whether it's racist or not, he should be allowed to speak. Freedom of speech means all speech--racist, or otherwise. It's a shame the UK has strayed so far away from their very own tradition of liberty."
Tell that to Ernst Zundel, the guy who led a campaign to ban Schindler's List. But of course you won't. And its not because he kicked the bucket. Its because Holocaust deniers are nothing but a bunch of hypocrites.
Zack what the fuck are you talking about, stop twisting what the movie is about.
Irving was a Holocaust denier. There’s a difference between Hate Speech and “Freedom of Speech”
This film is all deception and slander.
And yet, you said absolutely nothing to back up your statement.
I did, but youtube simply deletes comments containing the truth about certain alleged historical event.
Like Dunkirk, Schindler's List, Saving Private Ryan. The Battle of Britain, etc
@@LukeLovesRose exactly, everything the offspring of satan produce is false and evil.
@@LukeLovesRose traitor
This is an awful movie - for a start Spall looks nothing like Irving and Weisz is much too young (and good looking) to play Lipstadt.
Wow, it's almost like they're played by actors and they're not the same people.
@@fds7476 But my point is that the actors don't look much like the real characters. The sarcasm of your comment is unhelpful.
@@tancreddehauteville764
Neither is your opinion piece, Captain Obvious.
Irving is delusional.
+Keescanadees Oh? You met them and chatted them extensively?
+Oh, we're talking about appearance. Oh, well, I really don't have an opinion on that.
Ares99999 the point is the movie does very well deliberately portraying Irving as a twat and lipstadt aa a the poor nice girl who’s been downtrodden.
Imagine being so delusional to believe a rigged court without a second doubt, and even enjoy it when some liars make up a drip feed abridged version that still proves nothing and only believe it because you are told to.
BUSTED!
The British establishment calling out anyone for racism, that's a joke in itself.
2 different things can be racist kid
Exactly. Irving is a saint, plain and simple
@@GlossaMEIrving’s a racist hack
irving is a legend
Nothing wrong with certain aspects of racism. Truth is truth, whether one likes it or not.
The word you're looking for is stereotypes. Some stereotypes have a basis of truth.
Racism is the discrimination, reduction, or generalization of (in any manner, be that via hate speech, exclusion, denial of income or property, etc) an individual or group of individuals based solely on a the belief that their skincolor makes them lesser or different.
These are stereotypes:
"All white people are racist."
"All asians are bad drivers."
"All black people are thugs."
This is racism:
"Thus, no white people can be trusted."
"Thus, no Asians should be allowed to drive."
"Thus, black people should be banned from public places or stores."
Edit: to clarify, the above stereotypes can still be considered racist, as they generalize a group of people based on skin color.
Stereotypes that aren't necessarily racist, but may be otherwise unfair or unkind:
"Women talk too much."
"Bikers are dangerous."
"Lawyers are corrupt."
It’s people like you that enabled the rise of Nazism. Any aspect of racism is not ok, it is never based on truth.
@@quillofthewolf5728 Forget stereotypes. I can show you video footage of people doing typical, typically horrible things in places like Uganda
@@quillofthewolf5728 I don’t know anything that can sound racist toward white people since they’re the ones who brought racism into this world.
@@quillofthewolf5728 Come to think of it, when they call us, “whitetrash” that’s to shame us for being poorly educated. That’s the difference between being racist and stereotypes. Unlike my brother, I like to read books 📚 while he waists time poisoning the kids with his poop jokes 💩
This film was little more than propaganda, their should be no need misrepresent people in order to discredit their ideas. I don't particularly like David Irving but this film completely misrepresented him and completely covered over lipstads poor conduct and at times her scholarly mistakes while presenting the weakest possible version of Irving's arguments. I'm not saying I agree with Irving but I think if his views are to be challenged then they need to presented as they are in full and then contested not strawmaned.
Good post. Casting Rachel Weisz to play Deborah Lipstadt made it clear immediately what kind of film it was going to be lmao
Listen to the words. How do you feel treating your neighbors like primitives?
@@pineappleexpress5324 She is a proud Jewish woman playing a proud Jewish woman. Your issue is what exactly? Thought so Nazi. Go to hell
"I'm not saying I agree with Irving but I think if his views are to be challenged then they need to presented as they are in full and then contested not strawmaned."
What do you mean by "in full"? Did you miss the part where Richard Evans and two of his Phd students spent months going through Irving's work with a fine toothed comb before the trial? The whole reason he was humiliated was because serious historians checked his footnotes thoroughly for the first time.
In what way did this "misrepresent" him? After a microscopic examination they found he selectively quoted, mistranslated, used forged documents, and ignored contrary evidence. Which is hardly surprising really given that the evidence for the Holocaust is so overwhelming that no reasonable person could look at it and deny it unless they already had their own preconceived conclusion.
@@seanboyle9527 did you read the court transcripts??? They found a total of thirteen mistakes across all his books which averaged out at half a mistake per book, of the thirteen several were extremely minor to the point that they could hardly be considered mistakes. Have you actually ready any if his books? And please don't say you have if you have not, it's a genuine question, have you read any of his books?
Enough already. We dont give a F after Gaza episode.
It has an impact, that`s for sure.
LOL! I kinda forgot how funny this movie was. Man, time flies by ...
more people died in senetor kenedy's back seat
Who is senetor kenedy?
Lmfaooooo
gamers being oppressed by beta women. story old as time.
2:40 Naughty Naughty
I'm not a racist I generally dont like most people.
That’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard
The hotel in Victoria bc was my disowned hAlf brother’s mothers & grandmothers hotel. My disowned fathers first wives hotel. They are all horrible people!
🤣 "I'm not a racist" LMAO
He's very educated and they don't like his opinion. I don't know enough of the subject but it goes to say not everything is at it seems, and he is doing due diligence by looking into the Holocaust and historical claims therin.
I for one enjoy the intellectual freedom.
I suggest you also try to enjoy when someone is held accountable for intellectual dishonesty like Irving was. The "HDOT" site has all the information presented during the legal proceedings and it clearly demonstrates beyond any doubt that Irving is a fraud who manipulates and distorts historical evidence.
They're criminals desperate to keep all evidence of their crimes under the carpet
If you read the trial transcripts, he actually sort of claims the opposite - that he's not a Holocaust historian, but a historian of Nazi leaders, and doesn't know much about the Holocaust. Often, when presented with evidence of the genocide, he just says essentially "I accept the evidence but I didn't know that, and so it's wrong to call me Holocaust denier."
@@boazmunro478 He denied the Holocaust on multiple occasions and did so on the record/video/audio recording, etc.
This is in the court transcripts. He claims to be a Historian, yet repeatedly denied an event he supposedly never researched but obviously knew the legitimate historical community had.
Very educated but it was literally proven he falsified evidence and used multiple fallacies + denied clear evidence of a major historical event. Ok
a fine sci fi comedy !
Feckin troll
Cringe
There’s a movie about Irving being owned, epic movie
It's fiction.
@@alextremodelnorte1905 The court transcripts say otherwise
It's fiction.
@@alextremodelnorte1905 it's not
@@briansmith2328 That's what you say, but what you're saying is false. The truth of the matter is that the film is fictitious.
David Irving is undoubtedly a man of considerable intellect, but also something of a naïve fool. Surely he must have known that everything he has done and said would be micro-analysed in court?
If his ideas don't stand up to scrutiny then obviously he isn't too intelligent.
Have you been to the Holocaust museum? Irving sold his soul to the devil!
Superb film with three great leads.
Unfortunately, Irving's legacy still persists in that Sebastian Gorka's mother served as a translator for Irving.
And
Wow , how did they transform a evil witch into a swan ?
Kabbalist magick
Racist or not he has dug up a lot of truth....digging for facts like an auditor goes thru financial records.
No- he has not.
RIP Tom Wilkinson
David Irving is a true historian, always write down who you can't buy eh
So you also deny that holocaust took place? Is that correct?
@@przemog88 you are stupid? I have not written anything like that! nor David Irving, who criticizes him is because he has never read even five pages of his books. At first I too was skeptical about his studies, then I read his works and I was amazed. who criticizes him is because he has never read anything of his work. open your brain, before you criticize you know.
They proved that Irving had deliberately altered the information of his sources to promote his agenda, that disqualifies him as an historian
*writer of historical fiction.
@@matheusgarciatravel5597you call a liar who makes things up a true historian?
Lol I’m watching the movie atm and this scene is on now
@@JamesSmith-qs4hx yes a couple
Perkins its ugly. But mr irving its god looking like an eagle!!!!!!!!! Yes god
This "movie" is awful.
Have you watched it?
@@Goodiesfanful Yes. It is very bias. And if I say more I will be accused of antisemitism.
@@SuperMarry23 My uncle hails from the family of Pogrom survivors, and I know perfectly well it would be wrong to act antisemitic. Besides, it’s not the Jews I have a problem with, it’s the Israeli government.
The courts. I thought there was but one case. As far are your insurance that he is not a historian that's purely your opinion. The court ruled on his defamation case. It ruled in favor of the defendant.
How you can make wild and rediculus the charges about him going to Hitler rallies makes everything you try to say seem burdened with prejudice and slander. Find us one Hitler rally and we shall in that instant make us your ardent admires. But to make rediculus claims against mr Irving's literary contribution to history because he lost a case in court that he prosecuted without hiring legal council fails to understand how courts work.
"mr Irving's literary contribution to history" Creating countless examples for history students how people might abuse and fake sources?
@@stefanjoeres7149 you must have been a. Very good history student. Learning the stories of your oppressors and questioning not one bit of it.
@@uncatila I am a history student.
A history student doesn't work with "the story of your oppressors".
They work with original sources and proofs, using an academic method.
Irving is a classic example of a researcher that twist sources and proofs to push is own agenda, violating the professional duty of any historian
If we are to look at people with such scrutiny, as to put them under a microscope and analyse them. Then maybe the Jewish community would not object to such scrutiny themselves. Has Deir Yassin been properly looked into, the way the holocaust and Nazi Germany were. Or is there "One set of rules for us. And another set of rules for them. And if this is the case. Then it is the fact that issue has been stretched beyond what it actually is. And distorted into something else, to suit a means.
Tell that to the squaddies that liberated the camps and were the first to arrive.
@@embalmertrick1420 no one's is denying. But there appears to be at least some, but not all. That the truth is sometimes stretched. Let's clear the air. And have a proper look at the events before, during and after. And in the following decades...
@@embalmertrick1420 I dont trust anything those liberating soldiers say about those camps. Ever hear of being sworn to secrecy?
There's been so much denial have been around my goddamn and other stuff not a racist either
Such a shame, David Irving I’m sure would have been available to make this factually accurate but of course the last thing any of these people are interested in is getting into the facts of the matter, of which most of this trial consisted.
Take whatever side you want, this just isn’t an accurate historical representation.
Make what factually accurate??
Stephen O'Brien To make it accurate.
This is nothing like what David Irving is like. It’s just outright propaganda against anyone who would dare question the narrative. To make them out to be crazies, racists or some other ludicrous nonsense.
It’s like saying you’re gonna have Russia vs Canada in a Hockey showdown, except Russia is just a bunch of imposters, all in order to make the Russians look like idiots.
It’s propaganda, not entertainment. You’re being programmed, not educated.
This movie wholly leaves out all of the great work David did, including only what they could use as controlled opposition to make the viewer more believing.
But this isn’t about a fictional character. It’s a real man, and a great man at that.
How can people lie with such reckless abandon about people with lives and histories and loves and broken hearts? What is wrong with these monsters?
@@Tehownilator It's based on the trial transcript. Were you not aware of that simple fact?
Marc Jones You’re sassy like a woman, you should be embarrassed to talk like that.
Girly.
And to the point, it’s “based” on the transcript.
I’m sure there was no room to completely defame him in that process..
Further, I know that never has the media or Hollywood taken any real event out of context on purpose under a motive made completely plain many years later or to anyone in the know but which is completely unknown to the average viewer.. no they’re always honest.
I always find it particularly interesting, this person who in this day and age still endeavours to presuppose that Hollywood and the media are telling him the truth.
@@Tehownilator Oh look, it's someone who is unable to read a transcript. Read it. Irving was destroyed. Boo hoo for you.