Tackling the Revell 1/32 F/A-18F for newbies.

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 29. 06. 2022
  • I love these kits that fight you, and enjoy trying to simplify what is a hard to build model. So, for all you budding Top Gun fans, here's how to get this thing together in simple steps. If you would like to contribute to the channel.. please look here.. / nigelsmodellingbench
  • Zábava

Komentáře • 38

  • @pontiacgto2005
    @pontiacgto2005 Před 10 dny

    That's why Revell classified the kit as Level 5 for a reason😂!

  • @davegiles2344
    @davegiles2344 Před rokem +1

    I don’t build aircraft but I really enjoy watching your videos.

  • @basfinnis
    @basfinnis Před rokem +2

    Nigel, just bought the Lancaster from Premium Hobbies. Used your code which saved a load of money.
    Wanted to say thanks mate.
    Appreciate your help and videos 😘

  • @syrmalcolm
    @syrmalcolm Před rokem +1

    Right. So I have been on the fence for this kit, and after watching this, now I'm going to just have to pull the trigger. What the heck.. it can't be much worse than some of the kits I've had to fight with recently. Thanks again for the content you put up, it's always a great experience to watch and learn and enjoy.

  • @OzScalemodeling
    @OzScalemodeling Před rokem +3

    Nicely displayed and explained for anyone thanking about getting this kit 👌 👏

  • @andrewchescoe6014
    @andrewchescoe6014 Před rokem +1

    i have this kit and without your very valued input it would still be in the box...thank you muchly for your time making these vids love them and very informative

    • @NigelsModellingBench
      @NigelsModellingBench  Před rokem +1

      Glad to help. I must put another video out on this one. The exhausts are a nightmare!!

    • @andrewchescoe6014
      @andrewchescoe6014 Před rokem +1

      @@NigelsModellingBench i no where near that stage yet but plz do...very helpful..thank you

  • @paulkimble7981
    @paulkimble7981 Před rokem +1

    I have this kit,and have found your video very useful,I look forward to the next installment.

  • @AlisonFort
    @AlisonFort Před rokem +1

    Enjoyed that - thanks Nigel. Give Jess a biscuit for me!

    • @NigelsModellingBench
      @NigelsModellingBench  Před rokem

      She cant have a biscuit Alison, she's on a special diet so no treats I'm afraid!!

  • @charliegrech8433
    @charliegrech8433 Před rokem +1

    I don’t mind getting a dog of a build ,love the challenge

  • @plan4u56
    @plan4u56 Před rokem +1

    This model kit HAS To Be APPROCHED as YOU ARE DOING!!!
    TEST FIT EVERY ASSEMBLY!!!! BEFORE GLUE IS INTRODUCED!!!
    MAKE CUTS, SAND, FILE WHATEVER it TAKES to Minimize the AGONY of this ILL Fitting F/A-18 Kit.
    I Wanted to buy the kit myself but I DO NOT Have the Patients to build for probably six months to a year before the kit is done.
    I've heard the Nose cone profile is off, the Burner can areas, what the heck the whole model.....ANIT GOOD!!
    Sorry Revell , this model unless you RE-Engineer it...would be the only way I would buy it... Don't Hold your Breath...
    I'll just watch the MAdness unfold as other modelers "Walk The Plank"
    Blessings
    Darrell Killingsworth

  • @kenhanson1819
    @kenhanson1819 Před rokem +2

    Great video Nigel! I've got the E version, but I'm sure the issues are very similar if not identical.

  • @mako2350
    @mako2350 Před rokem +2

    For warbirds I like 48th scale, for jets I like 72nd scale. for the scale 32nd for any kit it is best but takes up a lot of room...

  • @Rallycarminiatures
    @Rallycarminiatures Před rokem +1

    Sorry I missed it mate was working late just starting to watch now

  • @maxbrandt6
    @maxbrandt6 Před rokem +1

    The Super Hornet looks sharp in Black Knight livery, shame it's a not-good kit. Had you not said this was an in-house production by Revell of Germany I would have thought it was just a reboxing of the Academy kit.

  • @HughGordon124c
    @HughGordon124c Před rokem +1

    Buccaneers were the same Nigel ..hands off stick on carrier launch and that was in the 60's.

    • @NigelsModellingBench
      @NigelsModellingBench  Před rokem

      Really?? Cannot believe that they were so advanced in those early days.

    • @HughGordon124c
      @HughGordon124c Před rokem +1

      @@NigelsModellingBench Aye it was to prevent pilot induced pitch up which had resulted in airframe losses..edited my firt post..first flight was 1960...butterfingers me..lol

  • @d165354
    @d165354 Před rokem +1

    HI, greetings from Orkney. You said that the pilot does not hold the joystick. I would think that the sudden force of the catapult would cause him to jerk hard back on the joystick which would flip the nose up uncontrollably and cause the whole aeroplane to summersault on take off. i assume that the joystick is "locked" somehow untill the catapult cable has released.
    Dont Know for sure (ex submariner...we went down not up ) but it just struck me when you mentioned it ..that this may be the reason why....any carrier crew watching that can explain ????? over to you ......cheers mike ilett.

    • @johnmclean6498
      @johnmclean6498 Před rokem

      DCS pilot here....yes, the pitch trim is set according to the aircraft weight (mine is 16 degrees nose up) and the joystick is "hands free" during launch. The jet pitches to the correct AoA immediately on departure with no effort from the pilot. Normally they hold onto the suitcase handles in the canopy rail during launch. The launch controller wants to see both of the pilots hands before he initiates.

  • @powerwolf-vw8st
    @powerwolf-vw8st Před rokem +3

    I was looking at this kit as i like the F18 and tbh none of this puts me off, I dont mind test fitting sanding scraping more test fitting fettling filling more sanding test fitting rinse repeat ect.. If the detail is pretty nice i don't care. It's almost theraputic to me to make a pig of a kit fit and look nice. Perhaps not all the time though.. every now and again i think your sanity needs a tamiya.

  • @gadeeshi
    @gadeeshi Před 10 měsíci

    The most problem of Revell's F/A-18E/F is not the way they go together but serious shape issues. The most prominent of them are too round and short nose cone and wrong backhump shape (line and cross-sections both) and size in several places including the most problematic one - the section just behind the canopy which has complex shape.

    • @NigelsModellingBench
      @NigelsModellingBench  Před 10 měsíci

      Some would argue that they don't care about accuracy, and like a kit that goes together nicely.

  • @darronhedges5873
    @darronhedges5873 Před rokem +1

    The readiness is all!.Charge……

  • @stephicohu
    @stephicohu Před rokem +1

    do you think newbies can do this kit? the back wheel wells need to strengthen the landing gear. Phil's landing gear broke off.

    • @NigelsModellingBench
      @NigelsModellingBench  Před rokem +1

      I'm doing these videos to help newbies build it. I am aware that the landing gear is rubbish, as I said in the video. I am currently looking at ways to strengthen it..

  • @mikemontgomery2654
    @mikemontgomery2654 Před rokem +1

    Seems to me that the undercarriage is all plastic and that might be the problem. There is no metal core insert, in the gear. That would likely help or just replace it with white metal, altogether.

    • @NigelsModellingBench
      @NigelsModellingBench  Před rokem

      I believe the legs are strong enough, i think the mountings are what breaks?

    • @mikemontgomery2654
      @mikemontgomery2654 Před rokem +1

      @@NigelsModellingBench entirely possible. I’ve found that to be a weak spot on many F-18 kits.

  • @dompastryboy2237
    @dompastryboy2237 Před rokem

    It almost killed him.