can answer this example please Two conducting plates of size 1 X 5 m are inclined at 45° to each other with a gap of width 4 mm separating them as shown in Figure 6.4. Determine an approximate value of the charge per plate if the plates are maintained at a potential difference of 50 V. Assume that the medium between them has er = 1.5. Answer: 22.2 nC.
sir in the proof of uniqueness of vector field in a given region we already assume that A and B is equal why it is so . In the proof you take C =A-B in which you said that the divergence of A and divergence of B is equal and curl of them are also equal so that mean we going around and around the things but not an exact proof . Is this correct way to proof ? .I don't like it though
Thank you sir because of your many students take good knowledge. I salute your channel and your teacher group.
Thank you for uploading lectures.
can answer this example please
Two conducting plates of size 1 X 5 m are inclined at 45° to each other with a gap of
width 4 mm separating them as shown in Figure 6.4. Determine an approximate
value of the charge per plate if the plates are maintained at a potential difference of
50 V. Assume that the medium between them has er = 1.5.
Answer: 22.2 nC.
sir in the proof of uniqueness of vector field in a given region we already assume that A and B is equal why it is so .
In the proof you take C =A-B in which you said that the divergence of A and divergence of B is equal and curl of them are also equal so that mean we going around and around the things but not an exact proof . Is this correct way to proof ? .I don't like it though
It's an approach of proof called reductio ad absurdum