Thorium can give humanity clean, pollution free energy | Kirk Sorensen | TEDxColoradoSprings

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 7. 01. 2015
  • Kirk Sorensen stumbled across thorium while doing research on how to power a lunar community. Thorium is a cleaner, safer, and more abundant nuclear fuel-one that Kirk believes will revolutionize how we produce our energy.
    Kirk Sorensen began his work with thorium while working as an aerospace engineer at NASA. In 2010, he left NASA to work as the chief nuclear technologist at Teledyne Brown Engineering. In 2011, he founded Flibe, a company focused on developing modular thorium reactors.
    In the spirit of ideas worth spreading, TEDx is a program of local, self-organized events that bring people together to share a TED-like experience. At a TEDx event, TEDTalks video and live speakers combine to spark deep discussion and connection in a small group. These local, self-organized events are branded TEDx, where x = independently organized TED event. The TED Conference provides general guidance for the TEDx program, but individual TEDx events are self-organized.* (*Subject to certain rules and regulations)

Komentáře • 2,1K

  • @Scottietheyoung
    @Scottietheyoung Před 5 lety +290

    “I think that the best thing I can do for the world is to be a great dad to my family”. This guy has his priorities straight. All the best for a noble task in your thorium energy project mate!

    • @belalugrisi1614
      @belalugrisi1614 Před 2 lety +1

      Yeah, overpopulating the world while polluting it with radioisotopes. I'm so impressed!

    • @masonmatt2145
      @masonmatt2145 Před rokem +17

      @@belalugrisi1614 the world is nowhere near being overpopulated.

    • @belalugrisi1614
      @belalugrisi1614 Před rokem +3

      @@masonmatt2145 HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Good one!

    • @daszieher
      @daszieher Před rokem

      @@belalugrisi1614 why don't you start depopulating the world with yourself? It is in your own hands 😉

    • @doesnotreadreplies6853
      @doesnotreadreplies6853 Před rokem +5

      @@belalugrisi1614 nice 3 year old comment reply, i'm sure someone will care

  • @ronhu6035
    @ronhu6035 Před rokem +32

    You should update this, been 7+ years, love to see a new one with what has been invented in the time frame.

  • @mikebetts2046
    @mikebetts2046 Před 5 lety +378

    I liked his closing comments, "...The best thing I can do is be a good father for my family, second best thing is to ..."
    I can imagine a few heads exploding after that one. If only more people saw the role of husband, wife, mother, father as being the most important thing they could do.

    • @davec.3198
      @davec.3198 Před 5 lety +15

      As a father 3 times over..it absolutely is. If being a parent doesn't completely transform you, you're doing it wrong.

    • @fidelcatsro6948
      @fidelcatsro6948 Před 5 lety +2

      i was hoping he'd show us a plan to make this thorium nuclear plant as well...

    • @LeofromFreo
      @LeofromFreo Před 4 lety +1

      Self-imposed importance.

    • @mojevalka
      @mojevalka Před 4 lety

      @@davec.3198 yeah, it transforms you into a good copper .)

    • @tkeleth2931
      @tkeleth2931 Před 4 lety +3

      If he abandoned his family and pursued his project like a *real* visionary, maybe we'd have thorium reactors by now.

  • @meadydoheny
    @meadydoheny Před 5 lety +122

    As a former oil driller and huge proponent of advancing all forms possible of energy technology, I applaud this guy. I also desire to make a difference/positive impact and when I follow that goal the money comes

    • @bradleejones9959
      @bradleejones9959 Před rokem

      Save your applause for Troy Reed.

    • @dongleseon8785
      @dongleseon8785 Před rokem +1

      The part that he doesn't tell is that thorium reactor has to be a breeder reactor by design thus making it a potential factory of uranium-233 which can be weaponized after brief concentration. That's actually why US choose to go with boring reactors. Those conventional reactors can't breed nuclear fuels thus making it easier to share it with other country without constantly checking over their shoulders.
      Now that I realized this comment is 3 years old, I'll cut short here!

    • @chadsimmons6347
      @chadsimmons6347 Před rokem

      If Elon Musk were developing Thorium, he would need a cover to keep it secret,,so thats why he bought Twitter

    • @Deontjie
      @Deontjie Před rokem

      The way the US government has become so corrupted, they will probably block all progress that can diminish the profits of their "lobby" donors. I don't think the US government will pause for a moment to pass legislation that will harm it's own citizens.

    • @richardromero1736
      @richardromero1736 Před rokem

      @@chadsimmons6347 Twitter because of the potential Mass has he can control with his AI

  • @corvuscrow5485
    @corvuscrow5485 Před 4 lety +258

    I've watched a few of his talks/presentations, he seems to be knowledgeable and sincere. He seems to be a good man. In the old fashioned sense. Not seen so much these days. I hope he gets his funding and succeeds.

    • @ripme6616
      @ripme6616 Před 4 lety +4

      Corvus Crow for all of us

    • @corvuscrow5485
      @corvuscrow5485 Před 4 lety +6

      Absolutely

    • @watchthe1369
      @watchthe1369 Před 2 lety +9

      Sorenson discovered thorium reactors when he was looking for a moon colony power source. He used to work for NASA, so yes he is knowledgeable. Watch 3 or 4 of his long videos instead of binge watching the musketeers and youe will have a nice grounding in a lot of nuclear energy.

    • @davidgagnon2849
      @davidgagnon2849 Před rokem +11

      If those in power can't get their greedy hands into it, it'll never happen.

    • @tonycox6534
      @tonycox6534 Před rokem

      @@ripme6616 66

  • @maggie642
    @maggie642 Před 4 lety +75

    So happy to have stumbled upon this,I have been a promoter of Thorium for years & cannot understand why we are all struggling for a cleaner fuel when the solution is right under our feet. If only all money spent had been on developing Thorium reactors, we'd be a lot better off. Especially the waste we are burying & leaving to our children to deal with in the future !! Thank-you, keep educating the world.

    • @jacqueslefave4296
      @jacqueslefave4296 Před rokem

      Because of the Jane Fonda antinuke Luddites, who are totally immune to reason or real science, but are politically cunning, wicked, and masters at propaganda and fear mongering. Thorium would be good for America and Western Civilization, which is why they hate it because they hate us. Look up "Agenda 21" and "Georgia Stones", you will see what and how the political elites think. Also, the World Economic Forum and their meeting in Davos, Switzerland.

    • @brucestewart3170
      @brucestewart3170 Před rokem +3

      The government forced push for breeder reactors ruined everything. Corruption is the main problem.

    • @craig328
      @craig328 Před rokem +2

      @@brucestewart3170 It wasn't corruption. It was a Cold War era imperative. That said, there's no really good excuse now.

    • @kevinfogle7929
      @kevinfogle7929 Před rokem

      What's really telling is that it is not even part of the conversation. It is never discussed and I imagine over 95% of people are unaware of thorium. The powers that be tell the media not to discuss it, therefore it is unknown.

    • @GORT70
      @GORT70 Před rokem +1

      Because it works.

  • @MaxB6851
    @MaxB6851 Před 5 lety +107

    Hi Kirk, Thorium Reactors and Desalination Plants should be built on ships that are nearing the end of their use by date .
    They can be moored in any port that is experiencing drought and draw salt water straight out of the harbour.
    If the drought breaks they can be moved to another port that is experiencing drought.
    Excess electricity can be fed into the city's electricity grid.
    Fresh water can be pumped into the city's water mains, it would have the effect of increasing the holding capacity of rain water dams.
    Salt that is recovered in the process is a valuable commodity, it can be on sold to industry.
    A fleet of these ships could be greening the world.
    Imagine the number of new jobs this industry would create.

    • @maybee...
      @maybee... Před 5 lety +7

      This is a great idea.
      Evaporation chambers would also create clean water, the problem is the size of chambers needed to quench the needs like California.
      We are on the right track.
      Now what to do with plastics, evaporation chambers?

    • @ProlificInvention
      @ProlificInvention Před rokem +2

      Genius idea

    • @franciscorompana2985
      @franciscorompana2985 Před rokem

      Ships are one of the main sources of polution, next.

    • @Christian_Prepper
      @Christian_Prepper Před rokem +12

      @@franciscorompana2985 *Consider reading more carefully. The original comment clearly stated: "on ships that are nearing the end of their use by date"? So since there are already ships in existence & always will be, we may as well allow the older ones that are not as sea worthy to be used in a productive way rather than allow them to go to a land fill, etc.*

    • @franciscorompana2985
      @franciscorompana2985 Před rokem

      @@Christian_Prepper "nearing the end" go to the bottom for turists.

  • @georgetosounidis5545
    @georgetosounidis5545 Před 4 lety +62

    As an M.Eng Environmental Engineer, i totally agree with what he says. From what i've learned , Th is indeed the future and nuclear power is the greenest form of energy we can hope for.

    • @Noitisnt-ns7mo
      @Noitisnt-ns7mo Před 2 lety

      1969 was the "future".

    • @adbogo
      @adbogo Před 2 lety

      Did you do a correspondence course in environmental engineering?

    • @adbogo
      @adbogo Před 2 lety

      @@gtaonline-oldgiga7729 Everyone who thinks that nuclear energy is the solution for green energy. Only solar energy will bring that solution, the reason being that it is abundant on earth; all we have to do is harvest it. It is clean, free of charge, it will last for eons and there is no waste to get rid of.

    • @yeetyeet7070
      @yeetyeet7070 Před rokem +2

      How much Uranium do you think we can source from the Planet, George? How many working Thorium reactors have you seen, George?
      I hope there's more behind that engineering degree of yours (like a frame and a wall perhaps).

    • @genespell4340
      @genespell4340 Před rokem +1

      Without having to store and guard it for 10,000 years as we have to do with the current nuclear fuel.

  • @pepegoeth6814
    @pepegoeth6814 Před 9 lety +1255

    It feels like a lifetime ago when i decided that worshipping entertainment oriented celebrities was not only vapid, but it was also essentially poking a finger into the eye of people that ACTUALLY change civilizations for the better..
    This dude personifies just that notion...I am infinitely more interested in what he has to say than 1,000 kim kardashians in 1,000 lifetimes. I love entertainers but guys like this are MY rock stars... thank you for all you do!!

    • @daddyebzy
      @daddyebzy Před 5 lety +4

      Pepe (you're WELL ON your way with that kind of thinking)check out the 2014 movie called SLINGSHOT drop me note afterwards

    • @clavo3352
      @clavo3352 Před 5 lety +10

      Pepe - Damn well said!

    • @richardherberthenkle2817
      @richardherberthenkle2817 Před 5 lety +4

      well said

    • @AnsweringAtheism
      @AnsweringAtheism Před 5 lety +12

      Bronze statues of Kirk Sorensen and Elon Musk will be put in City Squares all over the world for the next 200 years.

    • @davidporowski9512
      @davidporowski9512 Před 5 lety +8

      Pepe Goeth
      Lithium batteries are obsolete;
      The Oceans are Full of Clean
      Hydrogen.

  • @andrewwhalley1967
    @andrewwhalley1967 Před 5 lety +48

    Surely one of the best TED talks. Articulate and clear, good graphics that actually aid understanding, no showboating, just great science and great history. Thank you Professor Sorenson.

  • @andersonw12
    @andersonw12 Před 5 lety +19

    I love how this guy ended his talk. Because people tend not to care about the facts but they love stories, and this guy made his science into a good story. And he established his motivation as caring about people.

  • @AresNeon
    @AresNeon Před 4 lety +43

    I don't know how to say it, but keep preaching thorium. It is the only way we will climb above our nuclear future.

    • @genespell4340
      @genespell4340 Před rokem

      Or our no future at all because of all out nuclear war.

  • @yetanotherjohn
    @yetanotherjohn Před 2 lety +37

    I have been fascinated with thorium for a very long time. This is the best piece I have ever seen on it. Excellent work!

    • @harrywalker968
      @harrywalker968 Před rokem

      it was used in the u.s., back in 1956, for 18 months, then banned by the military as did not produce weapons grade material..tesla, & the pyramids, produced free world wide power.. history,,not mainstream bs..

    • @scottcarr3264
      @scottcarr3264 Před 11 měsíci

      Yes, Kirk is the "Go To man" on Thorium reactors.

  • @CBC460
    @CBC460 Před 3 lety +10

    All countries around the world should be on board with this! This will make a huge positive change around the world.

  • @boblabla4756
    @boblabla4756 Před 5 lety +62

    If I ever win the lottery I'm finding this guy.

  • @truthseeker4491
    @truthseeker4491 Před 4 lety +18

    A great talk. The endeavour for easy, clean energy is indeed arduous. And this guy summarised nicely how human kind has gone through a great deal of trial and error in the field of nuclear energy. Our journey continues. Such guys make the journey easier..... Kudos..

  • @_pbt_5965
    @_pbt_5965 Před 2 lety +17

    The more I listen about Thorium the more I learn how good this element is. "Thorium is lousy at making a nuclear weapon" that means this technology is a global export available to all of humanity.

    • @harrywalker968
      @harrywalker968 Před rokem

      you cant export something thats useless..it was banned back in 1956 for this reason,,wake up.. the military need nuke reactors..not salt..

  • @theot4077
    @theot4077 Před rokem +8

    I am late coming to this -- I must say the exposure to 'Thorium' is essential to the Global energy resource research theater. This must be explored much further, and no doubt it will.
    Thank you, Kirk Sorensen, for your efforts and time to educate all who are, perhaps totally unaware of energy alternatives.

    • @johnl6176
      @johnl6176 Před rokem

      They've been exploring this for 70+ years now: I doubt there's much more to learn.

  • @passionfly1
    @passionfly1 Před 4 lety +6

    I can listen to Kirk Sorenson all day when he talks about the history of Thorium. He is an excellent speaker and I encourage watching all his videos on CZcams!

  • @aluminumferl
    @aluminumferl Před rokem +29

    Fascinating. One of the best TED talks I've seen. Love the speaker's enthusiasm for Thorium as a clean and sustainable energy source.

    • @scottcarr3264
      @scottcarr3264 Před rokem

      I think it is the ONLY LOGICAL Nuclear that we have, Uranium Reactors are STILL too unsafe, Thorium is self scramming and when the load is dumped it drops it's heat very fast, Unlike Uranium, AND we have a lot More Thorium than Uranium in the crust. It is what is called a "No Brainer".

    • @jackfanning7952
      @jackfanning7952 Před rokem

      Lies

    • @Theineluctable_SOME_CANT
      @Theineluctable_SOME_CANT Před rokem +1

      It's not actually sustainable, by the way.
      But there is enough to power a world of 7 billion for 1000 years. OR: 500 million (1/14 of current level) for 15 thpusand years.
      GUESS which one the elites are going for!
      You are not invited to their party, even as a servant. You (and I) are to die.
      That will be the reason for their party.

    • @Theineluctable_SOME_CANT
      @Theineluctable_SOME_CANT Před rokem +4

      @@jackfanning7952 you only said one word. So you meant to say: "lie"
      And yes, you did just lie.

    • @harrywalker968
      @harrywalker968 Před rokem

      it was used in u.s back in 1956, for 18 months,,then banned by thwe military as didnt produce weapons grade material. tesla, & the pyramids, produced free world wide power.. history,not mainstream bs..

  • @jg5555
    @jg5555 Před 8 lety +14

    It's always a pleasure and inspiration to listen to Kirk Sorensen!

  • @kennylong7281
    @kennylong7281 Před 2 lety +21

    This is REAL SCIENCE. Science must exist for the purpose of making life better for human civilization. This is research that serves the common good. Thank you TED Talks.

    • @alanmcnaughton3628
      @alanmcnaughton3628 Před 2 lety +1

      My sister did high school science in the late 1960s, due of the school in 1969.
      That years textbooks were teaching about both thorium and uranium being used in reactors.
      I read up on these and so this talk or a similar one 5 or 6 years ago pricked my memo on this.
      The reason enriched uranium was chose is alluded to here as the reason thorium was ditched in favour of weapons grade uranium, Mmmmmm.
      History has a way of brought the truth.
      Thorium = safe and effective for mankind
      Uranium = powered to kill at will.
      Is there a tie to the string pullers?
      Edit thanks for changing DUX into due SPELL caster.

    • @matthewseed3386
      @matthewseed3386 Před rokem +1

      Science should have no "purpose" other than gaining knowledge and answering questions. Sometimes the science tells us things we don't want to know that make us uncomfortable but we need to understand it just the same.

  • @vy5218
    @vy5218 Před 4 lety +7

    India has the largest reserve of thorium in the world with proven 25% of global reserves in single country. It requires a 3 stage process to convert into fissile material of U-233. We are working on it and definitely will achieve the feat.

  • @markrothenberg9867
    @markrothenberg9867 Před 4 lety +4

    Brilliant. I agree with him...WWII took us down the path of nuclear bombs and away from clean safe energy. I wish him much success. We need it.

    • @jacksimpson-rogers1069
      @jacksimpson-rogers1069 Před rokem

      Not true. It was the cold war that is guilty. Don't forget that the Manhattan Project was so that we'd have a response if Hitler's Germany and the few first class clever nuclear physicists that hadn't left managed to build such a bomb.
      The WWII research would never have happened for peaceful purposes.

  • @Adam-ui3yn
    @Adam-ui3yn Před 8 lety +20

    Wow what an amazing speach, so well organized and explained. Its very rare I see a presentation performed so well I hope this man can see his goals accomplished in his lifetime. I love seeing people passionate about things that will help them and others improve.

  • @AndrewDodson_AdamsAtoms
    @AndrewDodson_AdamsAtoms Před 9 lety +24

    God Bless Kirk Sorensen!

  • @sethapex9670
    @sethapex9670 Před 4 lety +2

    one slightly important point that kirk leaves out is that it is possible to separate U233 from the other highly radioactive contaminants via chemical separation of the protactinium 233 produced by irradiating the thorium and waiting until it decays into U233. therefore it is possible to breed fuel for a nuclear weapon from thorium. in fact it's almost as easy as breeding plutonium.

  • @dmseeme123
    @dmseeme123 Před 5 lety +24

    Impressive ideas and I wish him great success!

  • @francistalbot6584
    @francistalbot6584 Před 7 lety +45

    I like Kirk Sorensen a lot. I am a nuclear engineer at US NRC and the USA needs to move fast with the development of LFTRs.

    • @dickditty480
      @dickditty480 Před 7 lety +3

      He's a good man I think. I only ever met him once back in the 90's

    • @marcl705
      @marcl705 Před 6 lety +3

      Francis Talbot , Soon I will seek financing for Kirk LFTRs.

    • @joeldempsey1269
      @joeldempsey1269 Před 5 lety

      @@marcl705 Ever get that finance going?

    • @vinbaker3112
      @vinbaker3112 Před 4 lety +1

      Joel Dempsey Guess he really worked at McDonald’s

  • @loudnessjr
    @loudnessjr Před 9 lety +208

    India and China are currently leading the thorium reactor development. Japan is progressing in developing molten salt reactor. I think 2-3 years will we be able to see a stable thorium reactor kick on.

    • @williamwaugh8670
      @williamwaugh8670 Před 9 lety +7

      Loudness Junior Until reading your comment, I hadn't known that anyone in Japan was working on it. Looks as though they are looking at a single-fluid design.

    • @loudnessjr
      @loudnessjr Před 9 lety +1

      there is, but before fukushima accident. Idk they're still working on it or not

    • @williamwaugh8670
      @williamwaugh8670 Před 9 lety +15

      The example of Fukushima site#1 is an extra reason to be interested in liquid fuel because of the safety features it (liquid fuel) lends itself to.

    • @cerverg
      @cerverg Před 9 lety +7

      Loudness Junior I just got back from Czeck rep. They are working on one right now.

    • @andrebalsa203
      @andrebalsa203 Před 8 lety +5

      +osp80 Actually there never was a single thorium reactor at Oak Ridge, since the labs were created until today. You should get your facts straight, at least by checking Wikipedia.

  • @idesofmarchUNIAEA
    @idesofmarchUNIAEA Před rokem +3

    Byproducts of thorium nuclear reactor would be, molybdenum 99 for cancer diagnostics therapies and research. Zenon for NASA interstellar space travel. Excess he could be used for water desalinization and petroleum distillate manufacturing, i.e. heating oil, diesel fuel, kerosene, Etc. And the fact that it can’t blow up because it is not pressurized is just amazing.

  • @branchcovidian2001
    @branchcovidian2001 Před rokem +2

    SEVEN years on and the "Nuclear boogie man" still holds us back....

  • @gregsbest
    @gregsbest Před 9 lety +133

    Thank you for the clear presentation and mentioning reasons why Thorium and other compounds are better than the ones used for military reasons.
    Appreciated. Tx.

    • @Jackhand100
      @Jackhand100 Před 6 lety +1

      Their are 7 types of nuclear reactors that use thorium.

    • @LuxiusDK
      @LuxiusDK Před 6 lety

      None of them work, though.

    • @neilruedlinger4851
      @neilruedlinger4851 Před 5 lety +4

      @@LuxiusDK Of course not, nothing works if nobody bothers to fund the R&D required to make an idea work.
      Advanced technologies don't suddenly spring into existence by magic; there are hundreds to thousands of people who work bloody hard to make them happen, backed by highly intelligent visionaries with deep pockets.

    • @ronnieince4568
      @ronnieince4568 Před rokem +2

      @@LuxiusDK yes they do France has had a thorium fuelled reactor at Greenoble operating fir half a century .

    • @LuxiusDK
      @LuxiusDK Před rokem

      @@ronnieince4568 - you are not being funny. Why make up such lies?

  • @SetiI_ceng
    @SetiI_ceng Před 7 lety +83

    Kirk Sorensen.. Very amazing and smart man. Definitely one of my idols in my own quest of nuclear engineering.

  • @ronbishop4057
    @ronbishop4057 Před rokem +93

    About 1% of uranium is consumed in a conventional reactor, whereas 98% of thorium is consumed in a thorium powered reactor. The remaining 2% is short lived and some of the most valuable materials on earth. So molten salt thorium reactors are safe, cannot melt down, self regulating and zero long term waste. Sounds like what should be the future. No! Thank you, Kirk Sorenson.

    • @iargaCI
      @iargaCI Před rokem

      The powers that be dont want us to have such tech, like George carlin said... We have owner's (now called "stakeholders") and they dont want us "useless eaters"
      In there planned reset of the world.. Its a big club that and you aint in it.
      These people the elites who own 80% of all the Big corporations, land, money, if they would really cared for the climate,!! Which they dont.... They would have done something about it.....since they own pretty much every major corporation it would be easy enough to order those companies to switch to all the new tech like thorium reactors....but all that good inventions and innovations that they been hording.. They dont like to share... Free power and cures for illnesses is for the remaining 500 (800) million on earth...so first they have to remove 6 billion at least people on earth... They want it all!!! For themselves

    • @ronbishop4057
      @ronbishop4057 Před rokem +28

      @@iargaCI I agree. Additionally, the wars we have fought over the millennia have all been in the interests of the rich, not for the common 99% folk. We fight and die for those who are our real enemies.

    • @harrywalker968
      @harrywalker968 Před rokem

      thats why they were banned in 1956..no fkn good for military...

    • @abellseaman4114
      @abellseaman4114 Před rokem +2

      HOW PATHETIC OF YOU RON - to make such claims on behalf of a business and a science that DO NOT YET EXIST IN A PRACTICAL OR WORKABLE FASHION!!!!!!!!!!!!!
      You offer FOOLISH SPECULATION about a not yet workable reaction!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • @breakthrough8628
      @breakthrough8628 Před rokem +8

      Dear abel
      Let’s remember open discourse is an important part of our growth process as a society. We have to allow people to say what they wanna say even if we don’t like to hear it because discourse is our progress ultimately is made
      Success always! Dr. D.

  • @joshuahelmeke
    @joshuahelmeke Před 4 lety +1

    Really hoping for your continued success, Kirk. Thank you.

  • @WilhelmGuggisberg
    @WilhelmGuggisberg Před 9 lety +13

    Great talk, comprehensive,succinct and well conveyed!

    • @christophercooper7536
      @christophercooper7536 Před 5 lety

      SPEED SPEAKING CLOAK AND BOMB SPEECH .. INVALID TALK . . . . . . F FOR TALK KO FOR BUSY TRUNK DEBTS ..... PAY YOUR PONY BILLS AND F KO ...... KO ...

  • @tashpaug
    @tashpaug Před 8 lety +34

    Kirk, that was an awesome talk. Keep at it because I do feel you are on the right track to help mankind power our future and use up all the atomic waste we have produced so far. Really great talk!

  • @chuckbryan4817
    @chuckbryan4817 Před 5 lety +9

    Fantastic presentation by a very competent and admirable person; awesome technology.

  • @johnslugger
    @johnslugger Před 2 lety +3

    Kirk is an amazing man that will take us to explore new worlds and new civilizations. To proudly go where no man has gone before.

  • @imonlyamanandiwilldiesomed4406

    When we have Thorium nuclear reactors up and running, I vote that we award Gorden with the Nobel Peace Prize for his tireless efforts to inform the world about this technology. No longer will we war with one another over energy resources, like oil. By the time our Thorium supplies are critically low, surely we'll have fusion nuclear reactors.

  • @Richard-vf2yd
    @Richard-vf2yd Před rokem +4

    Kirk makes many great points!
    Nice to get multiple ideas!

  • @johnking7454
    @johnking7454 Před rokem +2

    Two numbers that are often misunderstood in this debate: First, dropping the bombs on Japan likely saved about 2 million lives, most of them civilian, by eliminating the need to invade. If you don't believe this, research Saipan and Okinawa.
    Secondly, I recently learned that at Fukushima, there were about 10 times as many casualties directly related to the evacuation, as to the radiation released. The death toll at Chernobyl was likewise overestimated. In both cases, these were OLD technology like cars without seatbelts and anti-lock brakes, compared to what he's talking about. Thorium reactors can't melt down, if they fail, they fail to safe.

  • @ewoud1175
    @ewoud1175 Před rokem +1

    Bless you Mr. Sorensen. Great work!

  • @skilz8098
    @skilz8098 Před 6 lety +4

    One of the better presentations I've seen from this channel.

  • @clavo3352
    @clavo3352 Před 5 lety +8

    The idea that a thorium reactor can consume and stabilize the waste fuel from Plutonium and Uranium reactors seems like political reason enough to fund the heck out of this guy. Where do I buy stock in Capn. Kirk Sorensen ? I'm so jealous of that brain!!! Blessings on you and your family Kirk.

  • @flynnpotter
    @flynnpotter Před rokem

    Excellent talk, my favorite TED talk so far. Such intellect and passion. Thank You

  • @ts1931
    @ts1931 Před rokem +3

    I'm watching this 7yrs after this man presented this. How far has his idea gone?

  • @CraigNorton
    @CraigNorton Před 5 lety +5

    I loved this! I’d never even heard of thorium before this. Great speech. Heavy in science (which I LOVED btw) and huge in heart at the end. Does anybody have any other links for anything relating to thorium and this company?

  • @jamesstuartbrice420
    @jamesstuartbrice420 Před 5 lety +5

    If I remember correctly, a chemistry professor at Penn State developed a way to separate fissionable uranium for the atom bomb by producing uranium hexaflouride. He also found many peaceful uses of flourine gas that led to products like Scotchgard. A very interesting hstorical aspect of chemistry that is not so well known today.

    • @nuqwestr
      @nuqwestr Před 4 lety

      Yes, to make MSBR economically viable there must be marketable products produced from the fission used to produce electricity. Not cost effective otherwise. Kirk has spoken about this at length, but not well known.

  • @stupidgamertag3388
    @stupidgamertag3388 Před 4 lety +1

    HOW ARE WE NOT FUNDING THIS!

  • @andrewgardner1535
    @andrewgardner1535 Před 4 lety +1

    Thank you for your work

  • @Romeoleus
    @Romeoleus Před 2 lety +3

    Sorensen needs to be given a billion dollars to further develop safer thorium reactors in place of the suicidal U reactors that are still being used. Great talk! Bright guy!

  • @backtoobasics
    @backtoobasics Před 6 lety +3

    man you got this subject down pat. some serious amount of info to absorb but definalty top notch

  • @jeff6899
    @jeff6899 Před 2 lety +2

    Love this guy thru & thru. A true American Hero to me...who I think more should maybe view that way. He is definitely working to become a HUGE Difference Maker.

  • @frequentlycynical642
    @frequentlycynical642 Před 2 lety +1

    Great lecture, great lecturer. Thank you.

  • @rosemarie8934
    @rosemarie8934 Před 4 lety +4

    I know I’m late but I want to thank mr. Kirk for his clear and exhaustive explanation. I was that kind of person that was brainwashed by the media and thought that nuclear energy was bad while the renewable one good. So I think that if more people that think like me before, watch this video would totally not only change their mind but also support this type of clean energy.

    • @bwj999
      @bwj999 Před 2 lety

      Join the Thorium Energy Aliance. We need to develop this before the Chinese do or we will be buying all our power plants from China in 15 years.

  • @jamesm.3829
    @jamesm.3829 Před 6 lety +13

    Studied energy in school for a while and thorium is the best !!

  • @shovelspade480
    @shovelspade480 Před rokem +1

    Quality Kirk Sorensen, I feel you passion, its inspiring.

  • @hl8560
    @hl8560 Před 2 lety +1

    Powerfull final words. Well said.

  • @jonlaban4272
    @jonlaban4272 Před 5 lety +8

    A story well told about why Thorium went into second place temporarily!

  • @bicyclist2
    @bicyclist2 Před 4 lety +13

    I've seen a documentary on Thorium before. This is something we need to get behind. I hope someone like Elon Musk takes up the cause and runs with it. Thanks.

  • @alforgeron1049
    @alforgeron1049 Před rokem

    You have your priorities perfectly lined up. Don't allow them to be changed. Your idea of reducing and or eliminating Nuclear waste is so important. God go with you on all you do.

  • @OneGuyOnline2
    @OneGuyOnline2 Před rokem +1

    Thank you for sharing this with us. Wish we had had the opportunity to make the decision back then.

  • @ilirfazliu7817
    @ilirfazliu7817 Před 9 lety +17

    Great video. People like you are the real modern-world supermans. Keep it up, hero!

  • @fixeroftheinternet
    @fixeroftheinternet Před 5 lety +34

    I would love to know more about this guy and Thorium reactors. I am climate activist and I love the idea of sustainable, low cost nuclear power

    • @RealHankShill
      @RealHankShill Před 5 lety +10

      Step one. Go to google and type his name in. Boom. Your welcome. Matter of fact you never even had to make this comment telling us all that you are a climate activist and you wanted to know more. You could have just went and looked. Course, then we all wouldn't know you were a climate activist and you wanted to know more....

    • @aggroknight4259
      @aggroknight4259 Před 5 lety

      Stephen Morris Enough with this "sustainable, low-cost" BS! Nuclear energy does NOT have to be sustainable! It only has to last long enough for us to transition to a more permanent solution, if one is needed! FFS! You shouldn't expect nuclear to be cheap, either! It's been well-established what the financial costs of global warming and the steps to solve/mitigate it are/will be. Finantial cost is not something to be prioritized when tackling global warming!
      You call yourself a climate activist? Answer me this, then: Do you love the idea of sustainable, low-cost nuclear power because it's a bonus, or because you would reject nuclear power if it doesn't fit that criteria?

    • @screamingnutbag7955
      @screamingnutbag7955 Před 4 lety +1

      I love the idea of pixie-dust and unicorns, personally.
      Thorium is a non-starter and nukes in general are nothing but a massive con aimed at gobbling up loads of taxpayer funding.

    • @reverendbarker650
      @reverendbarker650 Před rokem

      @@aggroknight4259 hmm, three years on, nothing much has taken place in this field, or nuclear, we've been promised that this is a solution since the 50s and so far its not delivered cheap power or safe power, even if we began to build many reactors now, it would be another decade before they came online , we still have the issues .. who looks after these reactors when our civilization collapses ? storage ? decommissioning ? its not goign to happen, even if it should happen.

    • @GH0ST369
      @GH0ST369 Před rokem

      @@reverendbarker650 I bet you voted for Biden, that is why your civilization is collapsing because too many of your kind have infected the gene pool.
      Thankfully Dimond batteries and the GOP might turn this around...

  • @mattyvishez
    @mattyvishez Před rokem

    You're amazing, Kirk, and an inspiration

  • @jinpoloperez6682
    @jinpoloperez6682 Před rokem

    "Choose to start to make the best kind of future you can" Well said professor.

  • @CreeperOnYourHouse
    @CreeperOnYourHouse Před 6 lety +141

    It consumes existing nuclear waste? It really should be more popular.

    • @karlitomoretti2312
      @karlitomoretti2312 Před 5 lety +24

      my thoughts exactly,, but we all know that if it does not fill the pockets of politicians it is not going to happen,, greed and profits have ruled the world, not the well being of a society as a whole,, it is said that the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few,, but sadly, the few are the rulers of this world.

    • @ivanivonovich9863
      @ivanivonovich9863 Před 5 lety +4

      It changes the waste into more fuel... Think "Breeder Reactor". There will always be some waste to dispose of, as well as that which can be reprocessed. But you still have to dispose of something and somewhere it will be put. Don't forget about the NIMBY's ! They want the low cost power, but don't dump the waste near them!

    • @puncheex2
      @puncheex2 Před 5 lety +16

      Well, what it does eliminate is the radiation from the 95% of the nuclear fuel that is simply there as filler - U-238, which has a half-life essentially the same as the age of the sun and Earth. In eliminating that also eliminates most of the transuranic isotopes which result when U-238 captures neutrons; namely plutonium and other long-lived isotopes. That leaves the fission products, which mainly have half-lives in the 30-year-or-less range.

    • @Fetherko
      @Fetherko Před 5 lety +2

      Thorium won't consume the thousands of tons of fuel rods that we are cursed with. It starts with mined thorium and makes more efficient use of it.

    • @neilruedlinger4851
      @neilruedlinger4851 Před 5 lety +5

      @@Fetherko Please supply a peer reviewed science paper explaining why Thorium won't consume the thousands of tons of fuel rods? I'd be interested to find out why this is the case?

  • @redrock1963
    @redrock1963 Před 5 lety +6

    Here we are in 2019.............I would love to know what progress that Kirk as made towards commercial Thorium energy production........oh and I hope his kids are doing well.

  • @kerrymadgett9852
    @kerrymadgett9852 Před 4 lety

    Thank you.

  • @christianparra-john3247
    @christianparra-john3247 Před 4 lety +1

    What a lovely bloke.

  • @charliew9515
    @charliew9515 Před rokem +3

    Just saw this Dec 2022; well done and promising. As a retired Apple engineering manager and son of a U/Pu metallurgist, I relate to many of your comments. Apple engineers are a pretty nerdy lot - after all, these are engineering graduates from fine engineering schools; never saw a hoody once. And you don't need more pizza. Thorium seems promising, and perhaps a competitor to fusion, which, as you know, has its own formidable challenges. Certainly the world needs some solutions - and this seems feasible, so best of luck. Lastly, to be uber-petty, you can have airplanes without Al, but you already know that. Cheers.

    • @Machistmo
      @Machistmo Před rokem

      This is BS, it’s dangerous and volatile

  • @kavishakti326
    @kavishakti326 Před 4 lety +3

    Awesome
    Thanks you shall soon get all the help to build it...

  • @TheSmokinducks
    @TheSmokinducks Před 5 lety +1

    BRAVO!

  • @sirisena7669
    @sirisena7669 Před 4 lety

    Thank you....

  • @MrLogicAndReason
    @MrLogicAndReason Před 4 lety +123

    Andrew Yang (running for President) brought me here. He supports Thorium!

    • @lawrencebaxa6168
      @lawrencebaxa6168 Před 4 lety +21

      The problem is he is in the Democratic party. And we are as adverse to the social pollution that party represents as we are to nuclear waste.

    • @brandonhunt8431
      @brandonhunt8431 Před 4 lety +11

      I saw the Democratic debate that featured Andrew Yang. He was the only candidate who addressed the need for thorium-based nuclear power. As much as I Iove renewable energy and think it is important, I also believe that thorium based nuclear power is an essential part of the energy mix ito stop global warming. I remember sporting "No Nukes" buttons in the 1970's. I should have sported "No Coal" buttons instead. This was a very informative, excellent lecture on this very important yet underrated subject.

    • @Fetherko
      @Fetherko Před 3 lety +7

      He lost.

    • @mattiaberardinodelvecchio4127
      @mattiaberardinodelvecchio4127 Před 3 lety

      @@lawrencebaxa6168 tr

    • @robertweekes5783
      @robertweekes5783 Před 3 lety +1

      That’s pretty awesome, too bad he didn’t get much chance to talk about it. I wish he brought it up at the Democrat debate.

  • @Ayess2008
    @Ayess2008 Před 7 lety +41

    India has two 600 MWe Commercial Fast Breeder Reactors in the advanced stage of design. They are also designing Metal Fuel Test Reactors for next generation of reactors.

    • @wiretamer5710
      @wiretamer5710 Před 5 lety +1

      And they will never get built... because the nuclear industry blew all of its credibility away by their mismanagement of plutonium.

    • @PAVANZYL
      @PAVANZYL Před 5 lety +2

      In the 70s/80s France built a fast breeder power station the produces 1200MWe but shelved scrapped the plant as it was not economical. I do not know what technological developments in that field has changes the economics. Perhaps you could enlighten us?

    • @neilruedlinger4851
      @neilruedlinger4851 Před 5 lety

      Do these Fast Breeder Reactors use Thorium as a fuel?

    • @PAVANZYL
      @PAVANZYL Před 5 lety +1

      @@neilruedlinger4851 The French used plutonium as fuel.

    • @ShashankRockerYo
      @ShashankRockerYo Před 4 lety

      @@neilruedlinger4851 thorium is used as a blanket material which absorbs neutrons to become Uranium and can be used in regular nuclear reactors. The Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor in India will use mixed oxides of plutonium and uranium

  • @frankie8958
    @frankie8958 Před 5 lety +2

    This guy is freakin awesome... Loved this.

  • @Gavinconaghty
    @Gavinconaghty Před 2 lety

    Fantastic!

  • @RightDoc
    @RightDoc Před rokem +5

    This boat has not yet sailed…it needs to. It IS the answer to clean, sustainable energy. And unlike a windmill and solar panels the byproducts are non-polluting. Btw it’s ultimately cheap and reliable unlike wind and solar energy. Please, somebody fund this project. Haven’t seen a plane yet with a solar panel or windmill yet.

  • @Paul-gz5dp
    @Paul-gz5dp Před 5 lety +14

    This kind of reactor is a solution to what to do with nuclear waste, as it is used to start the reactor.

  • @domingodeanda233
    @domingodeanda233 Před 5 lety

    I learned so much today, thanks.

  • @obediencetoflow
    @obediencetoflow Před 7 lety +26

    Great talk answering why we don't have cheap energy today. Thank god India, and Japan will pursue thorium.

    • @zerocool5865
      @zerocool5865 Před 5 lety

      @@arnusdarnus4944 25%

    • @zerocool5865
      @zerocool5865 Před 5 lety +1

      @共産主義者/民主主義Quick Learn sir homi j. Bhabha
      I am giving Bhabha atomic research centre exam in March for becoming nuclear scientist. Hope it happens

    • @screamingnutbag7955
      @screamingnutbag7955 Před 4 lety +2

      They won't. If the Germans couldn't make it work, the Indians don't stand a chance.

    • @homijbhabha8860
      @homijbhabha8860 Před 3 lety +2

      @@screamingnutbag7955 we already have a working Thorium reactor, just not a molten salt one, although some say we already have made it, since a nuclear power plant was commissioned but then everything related to the plant is now under wraps, but you can still see military personel,trucks and stuff going towards the facility on a daily basis, plus there has been excavations and large acquisition of Thorium across India, but it's under the secrets act so you cannot file an RTI for info.

    • @screamingnutbag7955
      @screamingnutbag7955 Před 3 lety

      @@homijbhabha8860 Who has a "working thorium reactor", exactly?
      There's nothing secret about it, the Germans built one, they ended up shutting it down it was such a disastrous waste of money.

  • @spidennis
    @spidennis Před 9 lety +9

    Lead the way Capt. Kirk!

  • @aylbdrmadison1051
    @aylbdrmadison1051 Před 4 lety +1

    I am very curious about this and would enjoy listening to more talks abut it, and getting many more opinions on the subject.

  • @chrispbacon4519
    @chrispbacon4519 Před 5 lety

    Awesome presentation.

  • @davesradiorepairs6344
    @davesradiorepairs6344 Před rokem +4

    I really wish that Kirk meets Elon Musk, and they get inspired to build LFTR reactors...

  • @johnskunk609
    @johnskunk609 Před 5 lety +9

    Oddly enough I visited the museum in Oakridge TN several years ago and asked about the research on Thorium and none of the curators knew what I was talking about.

  • @Exceltrainingvideos
    @Exceltrainingvideos Před 5 lety

    Superb!

  • @radiantphoenix4732
    @radiantphoenix4732 Před rokem +1

    You deserve the greatest respect for: ""The best thing I can do for the world is to be a great dad for my family and next thing I can do is to try to use my talents to bring about an energy source that can benefit all of us"". Big hugs with pure LOVE.

  • @retoupin
    @retoupin Před rokem +5

    Thorium reactors, along with other renewable energy sources, could be the solution to solving the long term energy crisis. As well, small scale versions could be used on spacecraft and space bases (on the moon, asteroids, Mars, etc.) to ensure safe, reliable power. Brilliant talk, Kirk.

  • @ProtonCannon
    @ProtonCannon Před 5 lety +15

    Now here we are in 2019 which is 4 years after this Ted Talk was Published and you know what? *NOTHING HAPPENED!* Thorium is not even on the table for development anymore.

    • @DieterBuys
      @DieterBuys Před 4 lety +1

      Only for tragic political reasons.

    • @nuqwestr
      @nuqwestr Před 4 lety

      @@DieterBuys Yes, but only because the reason is economic. The Nation/State, not Capital, needs to make the investment, so the investment is political, but still requires some kind of ROI that liberal democracies will understand and agree with. If Greta got behind Thorium, perhaps the investment might happen?

    • @DieterBuys
      @DieterBuys Před 4 lety

      @@nuqwestr Seems to me like the continued survival of the human race is a good ROI.

    • @nuqwestr
      @nuqwestr Před 4 lety +1

      @@DieterBuys Tell of a time when that was not true? ROI predates not just humans, but mammals. LOL

    • @mrkillionaire9765
      @mrkillionaire9765 Před 4 lety

      Andrew Yang has this on his platform!

  • @Nonotkidding
    @Nonotkidding Před 5 lety +2

    Yes, I am excited about Thorium reactors !

  • @eb3279
    @eb3279 Před 4 lety

    This guy is great! I respect his good values.

  • @WifeBTR123
    @WifeBTR123 Před 6 lety +5

    I read about Thorium reactors in Scientific American like 8 years ago.
    It talked about how the byproduct of operation wouldn't yield weapons grade nuclear fuels.
    I haven't heard ANYTHING about it since then.

    • @michaelbiggins7533
      @michaelbiggins7533 Před 5 lety

      And you gave yourself the answer-"wouldn't yield WEAPONS grade fuels"

    • @nuqwestr
      @nuqwestr Před 4 lety

      @@michaelbiggins7533 delusional, it's still too expensive compared to fossil fuels. it requires the will of a Nation/State, not Capital. So YOU are the problem, you ARE the Nation/State.

  • @omnipitous4648
    @omnipitous4648 Před 5 lety +262

    Here we are 3 years later. WTF is going on with Thorium?

    • @richardherberthenkle2817
      @richardherberthenkle2817 Před 5 lety +84

      Trump, Oil, Coal, Gas...and Banks. That Nexus pretty much silences this truth. It`s just too easy and good for the world, but not the bank accounts of those 5 groups...Trump may be a vocal distraction, but fossil fuel money owns him.

    • @Fetherko
      @Fetherko Před 5 lety +13

      They want billions of dollars of your taxpayer money to develop thorium reactors. It won't happen elsewise.

    • @Fetherko
      @Fetherko Před 5 lety +14

      @Alessia Aikley Putin "owns him".

    • @RussellChapman99
      @RussellChapman99 Před 5 lety +11

      China is leading with development of Thorium reactors. They bought the IP back in the 60's I think and are now doing serious work on using it for power generation.

    • @gherBUC
      @gherBUC Před 5 lety +1

      @Alessia Aikley Sterling solar discks! are 30 to 40% efficient shame they use them less! china makes now new models to push this tech!

  • @billyoumans1784
    @billyoumans1784 Před 5 lety

    Very convincing. Best wishes to this speaker.

  • @ejw1234
    @ejw1234 Před 2 lety

    Great presentation!

  • @ripme6616
    @ripme6616 Před 4 lety +3

    I have to inter-ject at 16 minutes this literally is the story of my life