@@tehgzizlauw1787 Blame the Americans for calling a liquid "gas" 💀 (edit: I upset the Americans lol, yes I know gas is short for gasoline, but it's still funny when you call it gas)
The tanks are soo strong that the car completely crumples before the tanks blow, and if they get penetrated they shoot a jet of flame rather then burning the car sitting in a puddle of fire
10000psi at mark 700 is around 200 liters of total volume, that’s around 200,000grams of hydrogen, 1 gram of hydrogen is around 28.5lbs of tnt(a little more then that) this goes to 5,700,000lbs of tnt which is 2850 tons of tnt, Hiroshima was 20,000 tons of tnt, The MOAB bomb, the largest non nuclear bomb, was 11 tons, let that sink in
@@eduardocastillo8611 I might be crazy but it doesn’t seem too hard. Nuclear Submarines use Ocean water / Electricity to create breathable air, i’d guess if you could add enough pressure with that air, you could get a car going 🤷🏾♂️ but I could be wrong
Technically that could work, electrolysis could turn the water into hydrogen and oxygen. Then your car would work in space or through English Town centers wich are full of cigarette and vape smoke and no air
@@eduardocastillo8611 its good tho if it became standard we woulda already made out 70% water planet turn to 50/50 its already bad enough imagine if we we’re relying on it for transportation
@@chx4eva 10000psi at mark 700 is around 200 liters of total volume, that’s around 200,000grams of hydrogen, 1 gram of hydrogen is around 28.5lbs of tnt(a little more then that) this goes to 5,700,000lbs of tnt which is 2850 tons of tnt, Hiroshima was 20,000 tons of tnt, The MOAB bomb, the largest non nuclear bomb, was 11 tons, let that sink in, not the same as a propane tank
@@DevlinShultz the moab bomb was designed to be as destructive as possible without being a nuclear weapon and is larger than that car, I really don't think your math is correct
@@qwwertyyuiopp it’s correct but in the way it explodes it’s just theoretical physics its not something that could actually happen because of cooling and air abruption
The tanks in this car cannot blow up. Look it up. Toyota put a lot of effort into the tech that is powering this car and I can't wait to see how its going to evolve and improve in the future
@@Gigageorge quite frankly as cool as it is, hydrogen is not really going anywhere. they may try and revise it a couple more times (maybe) but hydrogen is just too expensive to be realistic, and is insanely difficult to get anywhere but a big city in which case they'd just go electric most likely.
@@QuincyStick the electrical grid can’t handle everyone having an EV at the same time they better start on that before they have blackouts all over the country
To all of you saying it's extremely dangerous. Toyota have done numerous safety checks, one of which included shooting it with a .50 calibre armour piercing round. Not only did it not ignite, the gas escapes the tank at 45mph so even if it did ignite the gas would be quite far away while combusting.
The main thing with Hydrogen stations is that they only have hydrogen half of the time. Sometimes they will give you enough hydrogen to reach the next nearest station, and that gets annoying real quick.
@@ProvacativeAcornbut think of the disappearing tax credits used as incentive to go green, without the infrastructure to make it worth the effort to reduce our carbon footprint. Some people just can't get to a McDs to top off
People are afraid of change and it shows in the comments. OH it WILl ExPlODe. Everyone hated gas cars too when they first came out for various reasons and never thought they would advance. There were no gas stations when they came out But look were we are now. Sure new hydrogen cars might not be mainstream yet but once we get the infrastructure going it’s only a matter of time before most cars will be EVs and hydrogen.
@@chrispalmer3548 10000psi at mark 700 is around 200 liters of total volume, that’s around 200,000grams of hydrogen, 1 gram of hydrogen is around 28.5lbs of tnt(a little more then that) this goes to 5,700,000lbs of tnt which is 2850 tons of tnt, Hiroshima was 20,000 tons of tnt, The MOAB bomb, the largest non nuclear bomb, was 11 tons, let that sink in, in an explosion this isn’t how it would work since it is of course not using the system a hydrogen bomb does but still that’s a lot
@@DevlinShultzgood thing these tanks have been shot with guns leaving only dents. Still, I would not be stress free knowing that if something would go wrong, it would go wrong pretty bad.
@@DevlinShultzThe hydrogen dissipates into the air if the tank were punctured. The tank durability is insane, also I don’t think the math is right in your comment. It wouldn’t of passed DOT to drive 259.09xMOAB around town.
@@DevlinShultz I think you took meth class not math class, there is not the equivalent of 2850 tons of tnt inside that, if there was the equivalent of it then hydrogen would be used for conventional weapons (which it's not) and anyway the hydrogen is so much lighter than air and is contained at such high pressure that if punctured it would disperse incredibly quickly. a mixture of hydrogen and air actually autoignites at 600c and when you depressurise gas it tends to cool down a lot. Also one of the main reasons of death in a fire is the smoke which asphyxiates people wheras this cannot happen with hydrogen fires because the only combustion byproduct is h2o
@@ShaneAgain Even, you know, carbon fiber and epoxy? You would impress a lot of folks by rusting carbon. i get your point, but these ain't your average steel tank.
Seen a natural gas car (in Europe not the same gas or fuel in America) explode in a gas station the explosion was pretty big but no one was harmed even though luckily
What it is really like to fill up, wait 2 weeks until the station has hydrogen that is after finding one of the handful of stations. Then pay.$150 for 400 miles of range.
Until you realize its got a bigger exterior, smaller interior, heavier, and slower, mor expensive than most midsize sedans. Oh, hydrogen is expensive by the way
@@sebastianbuse8474 point of these alternative fuels is to save environment. Ev won't do that because quantity of lithium it uses but this car is far better for environment than EVs. So guy who cares about environment will buy these regardless of price.
@@currycel470 It's not though. A hydrogen car uses over 3 times as much energy as a EV car to travel the same distance. The process of creating and compressing the hydrogen is very energy intensive and not very efficient. (assuming your not creating it from natural gas... in which case you and the planet would have been better of just using the natural gas in your car directly) And just because a EV using lithium doesn't make a EV environmentally unfriendly. Also the lithium, once mined, doesn't get used up by use in EV. after a batteries life the resources in it can be recovered and recycled.
Funny enough, most of the stations store the hydrogen as a liquid to be able to store enough, but it has to be kept at -427F, so not practical to put that in a car.
@@Eyebarra negative, the Mirai does 350-400 miles per full tank, and hydrogen costs anywhere from $16.50-$21.50/kg. So basically $80-100 to go 350-400 miles
The answer to the above comments is it’s a private system with their own infrastructure in place to support it! The Rest of North America is not Disney Land!!
At 3000psi on the hydrogen benzine is 100 000 more energy in it then the hydrogen per gallon. at 6500btu for the hydrogen and 109 000-125 000 btu of energy per gallon. disel is 128 000-130 000btu.
@@samvimes9086 not really. See, hydrogen is an odorless, colorless, explosive gas which can detonate very easily. Gasoline is a colored liquid that smells strongly and needs to be atomized to burn/explode. Sure it can catch on fire and atomize directly from the liquid state but you'd be able to run away. Hydrogen fitting gets damaged by a rock, hydrogen flows out in a closed space, and 💥
@@Drega001 Existing nuclear plants don't get anywhere near hot enough to strip hydrogen from oxygen... unless they are in a meltdown state. And while concentrated solar might get hot enough in theory, a sodium based one doesn't. Japan does have a demonstration nuclear reactor that can get hot enough though, that's about the only even remotely practical way of generating carbon free hydrogen I've seen.
In Norway they banned hydrogen after a couple very nasty explosions at such hydrogen filling stations, a few people got killed. Most H2 filling stations are now tore down and replaced by charging stations for electric vehicles. Hydrogen will never take of as a fuel for cars. With the advance of EV's getting better and cheaper, charging infra expanding quickly, hydrogen gets less and less attractive and will ultimately disappear completely.
10000psi at mark 700 is around 200 liters of total volume, that’s around 200,000grams of hydrogen, 1 gram of hydrogen is around 28.5lbs of tnt(a little more then that) this goes to 5,700,000lbs of tnt which is 2850 tons of tnt, Hiroshima was 20,000 tons of tnt, The MOAB bomb, the largest non nuclear bomb, was 11 tons, let that sink in
@@addicz2 like I said tho a Tesla is much safer then a mustang not saying it’s bad I drive a mustang but that’s facts also 44 people died in 2022 from Tesla car fires and if you add other brands the number is around 186 in America some during testing out of 2million electric cars in the us then for regular cars in 2,000 car fires and in regular cars over2m crashes a year and 42,915 people died but if we do fires then 498 deaths and 2,167 life changing injuries in 2022 out of 180,000 fires so this does make a fire more common in a electric car by percent because common sense but if we do regular crashes then big change up the Tesla has a 0.16 per million miles chance of crashing where the average car has a 3.8per million miles chance of crashing on average, since 2019 they have had a total of 729 crashes and 7 fatalities while Lexus at the time only had 2,000 more cars then Tesla on the road 302,000 to 304,000 they had 21,567 crashes since 2019, of which 2,182 people died this makes a Tesla specifically more safe then most cars but would I rather be in a f150 or jeep hell yes
@Blackout____ point youve missed 10,000 pounds of pressure pressing on every square inch of the tank, waiting to rupture and mess you up.... on top of that its filled with an extremely reactive gas that'll disperse and make a super nice fuel air mixture that'll explode VIOLENTLY if it hits any spark (see thermobaric weapins for example. Fuel air mixtures are dangerous).
Blown up gas tank or battery is bad, but its not 10 mfking thousand psi bomb that can explode violently twice
10000psi at mark 700 is around 200 liters of total volume, that’s around 200,000grams of hydrogen, 1 gram of hydrogen is around 28.5lbs of tnt(a little more then that) this goes to 5,700,000lbs of tnt which is 2850 tons of tnt, Hiroshima was 20,000 tons of tnt, The MOAB bomb, the largest non nuclear bomb, was 11 tons, let that sink in
You can only buy this car in California though. Plus Japan is going for Hydrogen instead of Battery EV because that makes more sense since they are surrounded by waters and built many nuclear power plants.
This is literally a bomb waiting to go off. 10,000 psi has a burst power of 20,000 psi. That’s about 3,000lbs (1,400kg). Not to mention that hydrogen is extremely flammable.
As a blatant homosexual, there’s no way I’d be be caught driving this monstrosity which is actually a net set back toward energy independence. We’re too smart to fall for this bs
@@justincase2281 Have to agree on H2. It doesn't make sense. It isn't very efficient, and the gas is made from natural gas right now anyway. If they make it via electrolysis they lose another 30%. Batteries already make more sense as an alternative if we can find a way to make enough of them, and should the prototypes currently under development make it to mass production the issue should be fixed. As well as the range issue mostly resolved. There will still be uses for ICEs, but the majority of daily drivers and the trucking industries will be able to switch with reduced costs and minimal changes in behavior.
@@court2379 I have no kick against electric in general. But the enormous amount of grid improvements necessary will cost BILLIONS, if not TRILLIONS of dollars, batteries need to be improved alot in the coming years, and the human suffering and pollution created now to harvest rare earths is astounding. I don't want some African people to suffer or die so I can drive an electric car, that I don't even want. Bad enough all the Lithium and Cobalt being mined overseas, but China is benefitting the most. They have everything locked up, and a handful of western investors are going to be filthy rich as they enrich our number one competitor in the world, that would love for our demise as a nation. And they're doing everything possible to ensure that. Unless we can provide for ourselves, I'm not onboard. And I can't afford an EV anyway. I don't even use cordless tools. It's plug-ins for me or old fashion hand tools. I'm old and grew up "old-school". I like the challenge and the skill needed to use hand tools. When things get too complex and exotic that's when troubles start. That's how I see it. Cheers.👍
@@justincase2281 For the most part I use corded as well. Just the drill and impact driver are battery. Unless you use them a lot it is hard to justify the batteries. The development of sodium and aluminum batteries are the ones that really need to take off. Then it eliminates dependence on foreign nations. Totally agree the grid cannot handle it. Particularly in CA. Solar will save the day somewhat, but we really need to teach the public about nuclear and start building modern plants. Preferably thorium based, but the designs that completely use up the fuel would work too. I ran some back of the napkin calcs on that plan to have 50% of cars EV by 2030 and it meant the grid would have to expand by 2% per year just for cars. Now add trucking, and population growth and it is even worse. If the batteries are cheap enough installing them in every house could solve the issue as well. We need to smooth out the demand and then existing capacity could do it. Cannot disagree with anything you said.
You guys want to stop at the hydrogen station for some snacks 💀
They would still call it a fuel station
Well you can still call it a gas station because technically hydrogen is a gas. It makes more sense actually because fuel/petrol isn't actually a gas
Trust me there's gonna be a awful lot of stations.
@@tehgzizlauw1787 Blame the Americans for calling a liquid "gas" 💀
(edit: I upset the Americans lol, yes I know gas is short for gasoline, but it's still funny when you call it gas)
@AKMZ gasoline bro not a literal gas💀
Finally, a gas station is ACTUALLY a GAS station
Thinking the same thing lol
“Uh, actually gas is short for “gasoline”” 🤓☝️
Ever drove a lpg or cng fueled car? I thought they're more common...
@@DelphoxNotFound yeah but gas is gas too
Nice
The crash test must have been a hell of a show
The tanks are soo strong that the car completely crumples before the tanks blow, and if they get penetrated they shoot a jet of flame rather then burning the car sitting in a puddle of fire
so it will shoot a jet flame directly at you? sounds better…
😂😂😂can't believe someone spun this as a "good idea"
@@cartman4796 the jet usually goes away from the car because the tanks don’t usually get penetrated from inside the car
@@captainahab5522 but it still a lil unnerving though...
For anyone wondering, an bar is the same as 1 atmospheres of pressure at sea level, or roughly 13.3 psi. 700 bar would be roughly 9,300psi.
14.5 psi. 10,150 psi…
10000psi at mark 700 is around 200 liters of total volume, that’s around 200,000grams of hydrogen, 1 gram of hydrogen is around 28.5lbs of tnt(a little more then that) this goes to 5,700,000lbs of tnt which is 2850 tons of tnt, Hiroshima was 20,000 tons of tnt, The MOAB bomb, the largest non nuclear bomb, was 11 tons, let that sink in
1.0135
Closer to 14.7psi
Thats a lot of psi…
This car is part of the periodic table
😂😂😂
Is someone gonna tell him?
Every car is lmao
@@racecarrik 😂
technically, everything is a part of the periodic table
Now you gotta show me where tf I find a hydrogen station
😂😂😂
There’s only 54 in the us, 53 in cali, and 1 in hawaii 💀
@SonicFooty seriously?!😭
@@BoostDriven ikr, I know Toyota is trying to be environmentally conscious, but seriously NOBODY will but this car
@@lostmbk it's too slow to
if you get a hydrogen car in the usa you’re practically stuck in california with your car
Lies. Look up Stanley Meyer's and Aaron Salter's demonstration models. They were not stuck in fucking California with their hydrogen cars.
What a Nightmare
Ain't the cars fault
@@botgamingcodm5808didn’t say it was
Than, No Way
I am a chemist, and nothing scares me more than hydrogen... Not even spiders.
not even like... organic mercury?
@@eli1000fer tf you mean by "organic" mercury
Ditto !!!
@justaguy2001 yea something about driving around with a tank of gas at 10k psi does not sit well with me
They tested the tanks by shooting them. The tanks are at such a high pressure it escapes into the atmosphere before it can ever combust
Only issue is there are like 2 hydrogen stations in the entire goddamn country
There are 54 in the US. 1 in Hawaii, and 53 in California.
@@MasonJarGaming Still. Its impossible to own one outside of California
California, lmao.
VA has a total of 1. For the entire state
And the extremely high pressure tank, and possible hydrogen leak, something i wouldn't want inside my garage.
If I can’t simply put tap water in my water powered car, I’m out
- Barbara
We could of but they keep killing the inventors 😢
@@eduardocastillo8611 I might be crazy but it doesn’t seem too hard. Nuclear Submarines use Ocean water / Electricity to create breathable air, i’d guess if you could add enough pressure with that air, you could get a car going 🤷🏾♂️ but I could be wrong
Technically that could work, electrolysis could turn the water into hydrogen and oxygen. Then your car would work in space or through English Town centers wich are full of cigarette and vape smoke and no air
@@eduardocastillo8611 its good tho if it became standard we woulda already made out 70% water planet turn to 50/50 its already bad enough imagine if we we’re relying on it for transportation
woah hold up americans selling hydrogen by the kilo and measures pressure by the bar :O
“These were made in a factory…a bomb factory, they’re bombs”
Ahh, they were just kidding about all that bomb stuff!
Ever seen a propane tank? Same idea
@@chx4eva 10000psi at mark 700 is around 200 liters of total volume, that’s around 200,000grams of hydrogen, 1 gram of hydrogen is around 28.5lbs of tnt(a little more then that) this goes to 5,700,000lbs of tnt which is 2850 tons of tnt, Hiroshima was 20,000 tons of tnt, The MOAB bomb, the largest non nuclear bomb, was 11 tons, let that sink in, not the same as a propane tank
@@DevlinShultz the moab bomb was designed to be as destructive as possible without being a nuclear weapon and is larger than that car, I really don't think your math is correct
@@qwwertyyuiopp it’s correct but in the way it explodes it’s just theoretical physics its not something that could actually happen because of cooling and air abruption
“Somtimes you gotta tug a bit because it can get pretty chilly” i feel that
When she rubs her hands together before touching it, she understands
that happened to my dad at a truck stop once 😢🎉
lol
@@BeansRUs poor guy :( I hear lizards have cold hands 🦎
I was taking a sip when I realized what you said and I laughed😂
Now we know what's powering those cars in movies that explode from a single shot.
😂😂😂This is so funny bro
Actually would be a good theory
The tanks in this car cannot blow up. Look it up. Toyota put a lot of effort into the tech that is powering this car and I can't wait to see how its going to evolve and improve in the future
@@Gigageorge quite frankly as cool as it is, hydrogen is not really going anywhere. they may try and revise it a couple more times (maybe) but hydrogen is just too expensive to be realistic, and is insanely difficult to get anywhere but a big city in which case they'd just go electric most likely.
@@QuincyStick the electrical grid can’t handle everyone having an EV at the same time they better start on that before they have blackouts all over the country
To all of you saying it's extremely dangerous. Toyota have done numerous safety checks, one of which included shooting it with a .50 calibre armour piercing round. Not only did it not ignite, the gas escapes the tank at 45mph so even if it did ignite the gas would be quite far away while combusting.
The Tesla shills don’t want to hear it. These Hydrogen fuel cell cars will explode the world dagnabbit!
The main thing with Hydrogen stations is that they only have hydrogen half of the time. Sometimes they will give you enough hydrogen to reach the next nearest station, and that gets annoying real quick.
Have you drove one of these cars sir?
@@Thewesmen67 obv they haven't
Also it’s way more expensive then gas
@@ProvacativeAcornbut think of the disappearing tax credits used as incentive to go green, without the infrastructure to make it worth the effort to reduce our carbon footprint. Some people just can't get to a McDs to top off
@@Thewesmen67 Yes my cousin has a Mirai and I have driven it many times.
10000 PSI driving around is scary as hell
That car can’t be safe seems like a bad idea!
the tanks are actually pretty durable, I have seen tests that hit the tanks with literal trains.
@@orange1248 all fun and games until the car catches fire and the tanks over pressurise literal ticking time bomb
gasoline is just as bad with this too though. electric cars as well.
@@ryoaahy4271 not even close to the potential energy of pressurized hydrogen
Hold up, just gotta fill up my nuke on wheels.
People are afraid of change and it shows in the comments. OH it WILl ExPlODe. Everyone hated gas cars too when they first came out for various reasons and never thought they would advance. There were no gas stations when they came out But look were we are now. Sure new hydrogen cars might not be mainstream yet but once we get the infrastructure going it’s only a matter of time before most cars will be EVs and hydrogen.
That’s what I’m thinking. Literally a nuke on 4 wheels
It’s all fun in games until your car blows up
10000 PSI that is quite a bit of pressure I sure hope that tank has a safety shield around it
If the tank explodes I think that safety shields coming to hell with the rest of us
@@chrispalmer3548 10000psi at mark 700 is around 200 liters of total volume, that’s around 200,000grams of hydrogen, 1 gram of hydrogen is around 28.5lbs of tnt(a little more then that) this goes to 5,700,000lbs of tnt which is 2850 tons of tnt, Hiroshima was 20,000 tons of tnt, The MOAB bomb, the largest non nuclear bomb, was 11 tons, let that sink in, in an explosion this isn’t how it would work since it is of course not using the system a hydrogen bomb does but still that’s a lot
@@DevlinShultzgood thing these tanks have been shot with guns leaving only dents. Still, I would not be stress free knowing that if something would go wrong, it would go wrong pretty bad.
@@DevlinShultzThe hydrogen dissipates into the air if the tank were punctured. The tank durability is insane, also I don’t think the math is right in your comment. It wouldn’t of passed DOT to drive 259.09xMOAB around town.
@@DevlinShultz I think you took meth class not math class, there is not the equivalent of 2850 tons of tnt inside that, if there was the equivalent of it then hydrogen would be used for conventional weapons (which it's not) and anyway the hydrogen is so much lighter than air and is contained at such high pressure that if punctured it would disperse incredibly quickly. a mixture of hydrogen and air actually autoignites at 600c and when you depressurise gas it tends to cool down a lot. Also one of the main reasons of death in a fire is the smoke which asphyxiates people wheras this cannot happen with hydrogen fires because the only combustion byproduct is h2o
“Bouta get hydrogen y’all want anything?”
Would love to know the failure rate of that hydrogen nozzle on the car, and what the cost to repair would be.
same here, plus look at how close that handle is to touching the quarter panel and scuffing it up
@@FCT8306onTwoWheelsit’s plastic and rubber around the nozzle head
The last time somebody messed with hydrogen it usually ended up saying "ohhh the humanity". 🔥
10k psi...Straight bomb in your trunk....no thanks.
And that non flammable gasoline you created? You got any more?
And highly flammable and explosive gasoline isn’t a bomb?
@@Afewsmellyfingers gasoline in liquid form actually isn't all that flammable. Especially compared to hydrogen at 10k psi
I think the hydrogen bomb will do a little more damage than gasoline bomb ☠️
Only gasoline fumes ignite...not actual liquid gas. So whether you have a 10 or 100 gallon gas tank doesn't matter.
10k psi?!?! I can see that going well in the rust belt.
@@fubartotale3389 true, which is already on vehicles, that rust.
You think the tank is going to rust through?
@@Joe-nr9xf everything rusts in the rustbelt, it'll be a matter of time.
Agreed
@@ShaneAgain Even, you know, carbon fiber and epoxy? You would impress a lot of folks by rusting carbon. i get your point, but these ain't your average steel tank.
And once you have a minor fender bender, you too can recreate the Hindenburg!
Bro stopped at the hydrogen station for a quick tug.
Maybe I’m paranoid but I’m picturing that car getting crushed by a semi truck and blowing up a whole city
Seen a natural gas car (in Europe not the same gas or fuel in America) explode in a gas station the explosion was pretty big but no one was harmed even though luckily
@@guccigabbana.8284 Natural gas tanks in cars are around 10 bar when full. This is 700 bar.
@@TheCountess666 damn
Damn 10k psi? What wound happen if it got rear ended?
That’s what I was just about to comment on. I’m not familiar with the system and it’s technicalities, but yeah sounds like a little bomb
@@FloreFaune people already tested firing handguns and rifles at the tank, nothing happened lmao.
kaaboom?
You prolly get a free SSO trip.
@@GBR9794if an engine can run on it, it's definitely explosive. An engine literally runs through thousands of explosions.
What it is really like to fill up, wait 2 weeks until the station has hydrogen that is after finding one of the handful of stations. Then pay.$150 for 400 miles of range.
“What is up guys”.
Me: “The Sky, DUHHHH”.
75$ for 3 gallons 😭
3 gallons? Of what?
@@michellen5704if you notice, 20$ for .7 bar.
That is dumb.
@@CraftierUD ok
Some hydrogen cars have ranges of up to 800 miles and the only reason it's expensive is because it's not mainstream yet.
Well if you can get up to 800 miles a tank it’s really not that bad and this is also in California where everything is double the price
If I lived in Cali this would be my daily driver.
For out of state work, I'd have me a backup car.
Until you realize its got a bigger exterior, smaller interior, heavier, and slower, mor expensive than most midsize sedans. Oh, hydrogen is expensive by the way
@@sebastianbuse8474 point of these alternative fuels is to save environment. Ev won't do that because quantity of lithium it uses but this car is far better for environment than EVs.
So guy who cares about environment will buy these regardless of price.
@@currycel470 how do you think that hydrogen car was made? in someones garage? no it was made in a factory, powered by COAL.
Just buy a chopper like kobe, announce it like arnold tho "to the choppa, NOW!!!"
@@currycel470 It's not though. A hydrogen car uses over 3 times as much energy as a EV car to travel the same distance. The process of creating and compressing the hydrogen is very energy intensive and not very efficient. (assuming your not creating it from natural gas... in which case you and the planet would have been better of just using the natural gas in your car directly)
And just because a EV using lithium doesn't make a EV environmentally unfriendly. Also the lithium, once mined, doesn't get used up by use in EV. after a batteries life the resources in it can be recovered and recycled.
I’m tired of these liquid stations trying to swindle me into thinking it’s gas, finally a true gas station
Funny enough, most of the stations store the hydrogen as a liquid to be able to store enough, but it has to be kept at -427F, so not practical to put that in a car.
Excellent video. I had heard of hydrogen powered cars but had no idea how they got fueled.
Great job. Thanks.
10kpsi? Literally the pressure you would want a BOP for 😂
Exactly!! The moment I saw 500+ bar on that screen I realized I never wanna be in or near a hydrogen car
@@jaggrumph1504 you do realize that normal cars ignite fuel thousands of times per minute, right?
@@splenced7091 terrible comparison, not even the same. The ignition of fuel in a engine is controlled
They literally test the tanks to withstand bullets and explosions, if that tank detonates you're already dead from whatever caused it to detonate
@@antimatter4733 finally someone that has done their research Jesus Christ
How expensive is it to fill up? I feel like it would be a lot.
i looked it up a while back and (don’t quote me on this) but a guy said he fills up his Mirai for about the same as a gas car at this point.
It costs 16$ a kilogram and tank on Mirai is 5kg… So 80$ but when you buy it you get 15k fuel credit from Toyota
Same as a gas car but like 900 miles per tank
@@Eyebarra No it’s not 😂
@@Eyebarra negative, the Mirai does 350-400 miles per full tank, and hydrogen costs anywhere from $16.50-$21.50/kg. So basically $80-100 to go 350-400 miles
Hydrogen?! 😵💫 Hearing Doc Brown's voice, "1.21 GIGAWATTS?!"🤯
THANK YOU!!! It's nice to see someone talking about hydrogen cars
Hydrogen car, state of the art. It's shame that will never exist in my country.
Slow af
It's not even close to public producttion everywhere
@@UnorthodoxDoctor it's not slow it's better than regular engine
Nah it's super slow, impractical, and not really a futuristic option imho. Ur not really missing out on much
@Tyler Matthews only real futuristic thing we gonna have in a car is an engine that can make 30 km/L.
I’m pretty sure Disney world has had hydrogen busses for about 2 decades
They use compressed natural gas.
No they have LPG buses
The answer to the above comments is it’s a private system with their own infrastructure in place to support it! The Rest of North America is not Disney Land!!
@@martinmonette7598 what does that have to do with anything here 💀
We have hydrogen powered ferries in the west of Scotland,
The most patient owners!
Be careful if you start feeling heat. Hydrogen burns invisible 😊
$20 for 1 “unit” not sure if it’s gallons or “bars” but that’s crazy bruh
bar is unit of pressure
I mean storing Hydrogen for refueling is pretty expensive as well
So now we got bars, gallons and units to calculate how much we have to pay? Just take my money and keep the change my brain left lol.
It's kg of hydrogen. The Mirai can take up to 5.5kg so US$110.
@@Anonymous-ld8ox so you’re paying the price to fill up an suv that runs on fuel just for that
*scientist holding test tube*
Finally, gas station..
10 years ago when they used to talk about hydrogen cars I used to imagine we gon put a bottle of water in the tank and the cars gonna run💀
I just wanna know how much he paid for that fill up 💀
Same
Costs about as much as a regular gas fillup.
It's now $36/kg and the Mirai holds 5.6kg.
And then someone rear ends you and there's a hydrogen bomb explosion that takes out the entire town
He said 10k psi not ten trillion psi
At 3000psi on the hydrogen benzine is 100 000 more energy in it then the hydrogen per gallon.
at 6500btu for the hydrogen and 109 000-125 000 btu of energy per gallon.
disel is 128 000-130 000btu.
He gives real car reviews. He is honest and will call a car trash if it is.
10k psi?? That's nuts. Thats a bomb
10,000 psi filled with a plastic nozzle.....yeah, that makes sense 🤦♂️
And an EV can catch a fire anytime and no one scare about it 😂
@@samvimes9086 gas bomb vs. hydrogen bomb. The 1st one doesn't worry anyone.
@@samvimes9086 not really. See, hydrogen is an odorless, colorless, explosive gas which can detonate very easily. Gasoline is a colored liquid that smells strongly and needs to be atomized to burn/explode. Sure it can catch on fire and atomize directly from the liquid state but you'd be able to run away.
Hydrogen fitting gets damaged by a rock, hydrogen flows out in a closed space, and 💥
What was the cost of one fill up?
Dirt. It's literally leftovers from nuclear and sodium solar plants. It's cheaper than lithium if you source it right
@@Drega001 I think he meant how much the gas stations are going to rip us off for it
@@Drega001 Existing nuclear plants don't get anywhere near hot enough to strip hydrogen from oxygen... unless they are in a meltdown state.
And while concentrated solar might get hot enough in theory, a sodium based one doesn't.
Japan does have a demonstration nuclear reactor that can get hot enough though, that's about the only even remotely practical way of generating carbon free hydrogen I've seen.
Probably $150-$180 to fill from empty to full.
The Toyota engineers designed the dust cap holder are mad now. 🙈
500 bar? That’s an hydrogen hazard!
10 years ago we had to stay 100 feet away when fueling a hydrogen fuel van. Company policy looked at their hydrogen vehicles as potential bombs.
Something tells me that you shouldn't smoke in a hydrogen car😂
It says 0 comments, but there’s a whole world of hidden gems already
Yea youtube been doing this a lot lately for me
Bro Is paying for Air 💀
Bro is driving a potential hydrogen bomb
Don’t let the cap hit the paint!
Drama queen
There’s a little holder for the dust cap on the fuel door.
Why am I having this need to light a matchstick near that nozzle. 💀
King of the Shorts...☝🏾😎👑💯🔥
The first time he's convinced me to never buy the car he just reviewed lol
how much y’all think it cost for a full tank of hydrogen on that car?
It costs 16$ a kilogram and tank on Mirai is 5kg… So 80$ but when you buy it you get 15k fuel credit from Toyota
10,000 psi rolling down the road just waiting for the first ever “your car blew up the intersection “ lawsuit.
In Norway they banned hydrogen after a couple very nasty explosions at such hydrogen filling stations, a few people got killed. Most H2 filling stations are now tore down and replaced by charging stations for electric vehicles.
Hydrogen will never take of as a fuel for cars. With the advance of EV's getting better and cheaper, charging infra expanding quickly, hydrogen gets less and less attractive and will ultimately disappear completely.
When he says his car is da bomb, he aint lying.
20 dollars for one gallon is fucking insane
Its in kilograms and his car only holds 5 kilograms of hydrogen. It gets 75 miles/kilo. Still pricy though.
More of this. I think you can propel some different auto tech
Ah yes the Toyota Hindenburg 🫠
Yes, the 20 dollars for 5 seconds worth of hydrogen seems like a good investment.
If they upscale the production obviously prices will go down. Hydrogen is much better than EV anyway in terms of sustainability
Hydrogen vehicles have insane ranges, up to 800 miles on some models
@@qwwertyyuioppPrius has 640 mile range with only 11.3 gallon tank.
@@jamesonahillIt’s not actually. Hydrogen uses CO2 to be made and transported.
@@qwwertyyuioppWhich model? Because most I’ve seen get worse mileage than gas cars. 300-400 miles a tank.
This car has more BARS than Kanye.
$75?!? To fill up a CAR?!? Pass. That damn near more expensive than premium gas
get that 30 horse power!
Is this a reference I am failing to understand?
yeah like most cars need any more than that in a practical sense. what do you expect, a hypercar?
If you get into an accident and that tank ruptures. It’s gonna be a bomb
You really think the biggest car maker in the world released a car like that to the public without testing if it's safe in case of a raptured tank?
@@JackoBanon1yes, oversight is oversight. Dont put too much faith in them
The crash test rewiew:
Oh these aren't homemade. They were made in a factory... a bomb factory. They're bombs.
10k psi!!! That sounds like a serious crash hazard 💥
10000psi at mark 700 is around 200 liters of total volume, that’s around 200,000grams of hydrogen, 1 gram of hydrogen is around 28.5lbs of tnt(a little more then that) this goes to 5,700,000lbs of tnt which is 2850 tons of tnt, Hiroshima was 20,000 tons of tnt, The MOAB bomb, the largest non nuclear bomb, was 11 tons, let that sink in
@@DevlinShultzAnd accident on a Fuell Cell cars way saver than an EV crash
@@addicz2 eh ya but depends on the car
@@DevlinShultz Not to mention EV can caugh on fire out of nothing. Burning the house
@@addicz2 like I said tho a Tesla is much safer then a mustang not saying it’s bad I drive a mustang but that’s facts also 44 people died in 2022 from Tesla car fires and if you add other brands the number is around 186 in America some during testing out of 2million electric cars in the us then for regular cars in 2,000 car fires and in regular cars over2m crashes a year and 42,915 people died but if we do fires then 498 deaths and 2,167 life changing injuries in 2022 out of 180,000 fires so this does make a fire more common in a electric car by percent because common sense but if we do regular crashes then big change up the Tesla has a 0.16 per million miles chance of crashing where the average car has a 3.8per million miles chance of crashing on average, since 2019 they have had a total of 729 crashes and 7 fatalities while Lexus at the time only had 2,000 more cars then Tesla on the road 302,000 to 304,000 they had 21,567 crashes since 2019, of which 2,182 people died this makes a Tesla specifically more safe then most cars but would I rather be in a f150 or jeep hell yes
In the future, historians will marvel at the time that gas stations were giving out liquid instead of gas.
YUP
I’m pretty sure historians will get a good laugh out of the people driving around in what are essentially just bombs
10,000 psi !
Congratulations bro, you bought yourself a hydrogen bomb. 👌
Dude’s driving a Nuke
He looks so sleepy
Mark my words , hydrogen cars will end up being the future not electric cars .
We'll need a lot more nuclear power plants to create enough hydrogen. Most of our current hydrogen is made from natural gas processing.
Sure, carrying a 10000 psi bomb in the back of your car is TOTALLY the future
@Blackout____ point youve missed
10,000 pounds of pressure pressing on every square inch of the tank, waiting to rupture and mess you up.... on top of that its filled with an extremely reactive gas that'll disperse and make a super nice fuel air mixture that'll explode VIOLENTLY if it hits any spark (see thermobaric weapins for example. Fuel air mixtures are dangerous).
Blown up gas tank or battery is bad, but its not 10 mfking thousand psi bomb that can explode violently twice
Hydrogen cars are electric cars. They just use Hydrogen gas as a battery, a really inefficient battery
I hope you right
Driving an extremely PRESSURIZED car makes me sweat just thinking about it.
It’s like driving around a bomb that will explode when you crash
10k psi of hydrogen??? Bro you're a rolling bomb!
10000psi at mark 700 is around 200 liters of total volume, that’s around 200,000grams of hydrogen, 1 gram of hydrogen is around 28.5lbs of tnt(a little more then that) this goes to 5,700,000lbs of tnt which is 2850 tons of tnt, Hiroshima was 20,000 tons of tnt, The MOAB bomb, the largest non nuclear bomb, was 11 tons, let that sink in
Everything you’ve said about this car has completely convinced me that I would never buy one of these
You can only buy this car in California though. Plus Japan is going for Hydrogen instead of Battery EV because that makes more sense since they are surrounded by waters and built many nuclear power plants.
This is literally a bomb waiting to go off. 10,000 psi has a burst power of 20,000 psi. That’s about 3,000lbs (1,400kg). Not to mention that hydrogen is extremely flammable.
No, gasoline is flammable. Hydrogen us combustable 😂😂
Batteries are also dangerous, they will re ignite themselves multiple times after they catch fire, even without an air source
So is benzine with hydrogen at 3000psi benzine has around 100 000 MORE amount of energy per gallon then hydrogen.
@@TheAnnoyingBoss Do you know how a car engine works?
there is a reason it is called a combustion engine.
@@havtor007 gasoline on fire isnt nearly as dangerous as hydrogen on fire. Do you know what a women is?
Wow. The explosion from that car would be just like the movies lol
These things are moving giga bombs. Imagine crashing on the freeway with all that hydrogen and all that pressure in there
Instructions unclear. I’m hydrated now
And people thought electric cars with huge batteries were dangerous
The most abundant element in the universe: Hydrogen
First thing to do is find a place with hydrogen.
10,000psi, of ultra flammable hydrogen?! no! Hell no, that thing is a death trap hydrogen bomb. That will level 6 city blocks at the slightest spark?!
Ikr 10,000psi just sounds too much.
@@Dawson.O.P it will go of like a MOAB, at the slightest little spark in down town Chicago. This will topple the sears tower
With 5kg of hydrogen? Unlikely
After remembering the Hindenburg I’m not comfortable with running off hydrogen in a vehicle
This looks like an Early Monday Morning Video 🥱🥱🥱🥱😂🤣
My man.. is actually carrying a hydrogen bomb ..
Step 1: don't buy a hydrogen car
Is there a way to fill up without people knowing I’m gay?
Sorry. They will know as soon as they see it parked in your driveway 🤷♂️
As a blatant homosexual, there’s no way I’d be be caught driving this monstrosity which is actually a net set back toward energy independence. We’re too smart to fall for this bs
10,000 PSI?! Holy crap!
Gotta be a real learning curve for hydrogen vehicles so you don't accidentally go BLAMMO.💥
I am pretty sure they have done a bunch to protect the tanks, but it is still terrifying. Also adds a lot of weight to protect them.
@@court2379 The "alternatives" that are being promoted to replace gasoline or diesel, the better gas and diesel look.
Cheers.
@@justincase2281 Have to agree on H2. It doesn't make sense. It isn't very efficient, and the gas is made from natural gas right now anyway. If they make it via electrolysis they lose another 30%. Batteries already make more sense as an alternative if we can find a way to make enough of them, and should the prototypes currently under development make it to mass production the issue should be fixed. As well as the range issue mostly resolved.
There will still be uses for ICEs, but the majority of daily drivers and the trucking industries will be able to switch with reduced costs and minimal changes in behavior.
@@court2379 I have no kick against electric in general. But the enormous amount of grid improvements necessary will cost BILLIONS, if not TRILLIONS of dollars, batteries need to be improved alot in the coming years, and the human suffering and pollution created now to harvest rare earths is astounding. I don't want some African people to suffer or die so I can drive an electric car, that I don't even want. Bad enough all the Lithium and Cobalt being mined overseas, but China is benefitting the most. They have everything locked up, and a handful of western investors are going to be filthy rich as they enrich our number one competitor in the world, that would love for our demise as a nation. And they're doing everything possible to ensure that. Unless we can provide for ourselves, I'm not onboard.
And I can't afford an EV anyway. I don't even use cordless tools. It's plug-ins for me or old fashion hand tools. I'm old and grew up "old-school". I like the challenge and the skill needed to use hand tools.
When things get too complex and exotic that's when troubles start. That's how I see it. Cheers.👍
@@justincase2281 For the most part I use corded as well. Just the drill and impact driver are battery. Unless you use them a lot it is hard to justify the batteries.
The development of sodium and aluminum batteries are the ones that really need to take off. Then it eliminates dependence on foreign nations.
Totally agree the grid cannot handle it. Particularly in CA. Solar will save the day somewhat, but we really need to teach the public about nuclear and start building modern plants. Preferably thorium based, but the designs that completely use up the fuel would work too. I ran some back of the napkin calcs on that plan to have 50% of cars EV by 2030 and it meant the grid would have to expand by 2% per year just for cars. Now add trucking, and population growth and it is even worse. If the batteries are cheap enough installing them in every house could solve the issue as well. We need to smooth out the demand and then existing capacity could do it.
Cannot disagree with anything you said.