Artemis I Mission Highlights
Vložit
- čas přidán 10. 12. 2022
- From launch to splashdown, NASA’s Orion spacecraft completed its first deep-space mission with a splashdown in the Pacific Ocean, west of Baja California, at 9:40 a.m. PST (12:40 p.m. EST) Sunday. The record-breaking Artemis mission traveled more than 1.4 million miles on a path around the Moon and returned safely to Earth. Splashdown was the final milestone of the Artemis I mission, which began with a successful liftoff of NASA’s Space Launch System (SLS) rocket Nov. 16, from Launch Pad 39B at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida. Over the course of 25.5 days, NASA tested Orion in the harsh environment of deep space before flying astronauts on Artemis II. During the mission, Orion performed two lunar flybys, coming within 80 miles of the lunar surface. At its farthest distance during the mission, Orion traveled nearly 270,000 miles from our home planet, more than 1,000 times farther than where the International Space Station orbits Earth, to intentionally stress systems before flying crew. Prior to entering the Earth’s atmosphere, the crew module separated from its service module, which is the spacecraft’s propulsive powerhouse provided by ESA (European Space Agency). During re-entry, Orion endured temperatures of about 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit, half as hot as the surface of the Sun. Within about 20 minutes, Orion slowed from nearly 25,000 mph to about 20 mph for its parachute-assisted splashdown. During the flight test, Orion stayed in space longer than any spacecraft designed for astronauts without docking to a space station. While in a distant lunar orbit, Orion surpassed the record for distance traveled by a spacecraft designed to carry humans, previously set during Apollo 13.
Select music courtesy of Gothic Storm Publishing - Věda a technologie
I was a young boy when we had the Mercury and Gemini programs, then a teen and young man during the Apollo moon Program, then the STS program, I'm so glad that FINALLY we are doing some serious space exploration again! Well done! A near flawless mission.
Spirit and Opportunity, Curiosity and Perseverance, Cassini and Galileo - those are serious space exploration missions, too. They just don't get as much attention from the general public because they don't have people onboard. And the 180+ day missions on ISS have taught us much more about surviving a trip to Mars and back than anything in Apollo did.
Just because flags and footprints aren't involved doesn't mean it's not "serious space exploration."
@@brianfoss571 -Brian Foss 2022
@@sclyser and he's absolutely correct
We aren’t doing anything but lying to the masses for 30B/year we are forced to pay. How are humans so mailable?
@@BrandonBiden69 Well, if we'd stop slapping postage stamps all over each other...
For those who gave their lives so that space exploration may continue, you were never far from our thoughts. A new chapter begins.
No one gave up their lives for space 💩 Earth is Flat Space is fake
All I will say is that I bet Neil is giggling from wherever he is now, at this. I’m sure that if he were here today, he would be the proudest person on the planet.
Buzz is still around. I bet he's proud. :-)
I thank everyone from the Space Race era because it's because of them all of this is possible
I’ve been waiting 50 years for this. I was a kid during Apollo missions.
Why? Because we went back to the moon after 50 years of low earth orbit flights? Because we're keeping everything secret? Where are the photos of the dark side?
@@roshansri1636 6:43
Watching lift-off reminded me of a shuttle launch I attended. As anyone who has had that experience knows there are really no words adequate to describe the emotions. I wish I had been at the Artemis launch, must have been something else. (Even so - I was right back there.) Well done NASA, after all the trials and tribulations a massive success, and congrats to the many, many contributors.
Yes, it does. When those SRMs fire, the vehicle just jumps off the launchpad.
How do you go about seeing a launch? I’ve never found great info online for how to attend. Id love to see one.
Here are some words to adequatly explain it, it is a Blimp. Goes Nowhere but bermuda triangle. Earth is Flat Space is fake.
deal with it
that image at 11 minutes is really amazing
Beautiful recap. EXCELLENT WORK by everyone who was involved in this project/mission.
boy fumbled them words he so excited
Love that Carl Sagan Reference at 11:40. Now I am gonna listen to the Pale Blue dot over and over again❤
Congratulations on an amazing flight. Many historic images were captured as well.
Zero historic images were captured. Earth is Flat Space is Fake 🐒
On to Artemis II!
Slowly but surely
Pretty incredible that now we can do this perfectly the first time.
A day to remember our Heroes & families for breakthroughs in space exploration
🎊 Godspeed sincerely
The perspective at 6:50 somehow terrifies me. Seeing the Earth in the bottom right corner so small compared to the moon yet so close but so tremendously far away. I don't know.
Being able to see it in front of you as if it's right in front of you but actually it's unreachable. Scary.
Normal
Awesome accomplishment, Go NASA and all the teams, suppliers, technitions who made this a reality.
Thank you NASA scientists! You bring back my faith in to science 🙏 . I was missing the real first perfect photo of the planet we are living on so much! I was so upset that it has been all these years and noone did what you do. Amazing job!
You’ve been deceived, we didn’t go to the moon. Search up DITRH
🐑
Congratulations 👏
Great NASA! for the successful beginning of a new human moon exploration age.
Bravo Artemis!
Amazing, incredible wow.
This is incredibly powerful and beautiful……. Exploring the infinite space….. ahhh man this is my DREAM
SPECTACULAR. 🚴
Wow !
Many thanks to NASA!!! For these great shots! We don't show anything in Russia!!! Very informative, We love you!
To the future!
Hello NASA and NDASA everyone.🌞🌞🌞🌞🌞🙏
Please, please tell me if I got the attitudes right:
1. Outbound Powered Flyby burn: Posigrade burn (opposite of Apollo) nose of spacecraft pointing forward.
2. Distant Retrograde insertion burn: Posigrade burn, nose of spacecraft pointing forward, to raise the Perilune.
3. Distant Retrograde orbit exit burn: Retrograde burn, nose of spacecraft pointing in the opposite direction of flight, to lower the Perilune and fly by close to the Moon.
4. Powered Return Fly By: Posigrade burn, nose of spacecraft pointing into direction of flight (Apollo like).
Many anymations but almost none correlate spacecraft attitude of burn with trajectory and orbit change
Please tell me if I got them right.
Welcome on Earth
Приветствую ,вас ,всем здоровья.
It's awesome to see her flying and it not be an animation of lift off. Those graphics can be retired.
Was that the sun at 50,000 to 25,000 feet?
It's ok. Still cool that we return to the lunar orbit
But space shuttle was emotion💯❤
Wuhuuuuu!
Which engines are on this rockets? RD series?
no. they're literally using the same engines as on the space shuttle.
@@Agarwaen thanks mate..it means they are using RS-25 Pratt & Whitney..good
How did we have better cameras/camera angles back in the 60s with the Apollo program? Wtf were those onboard cameras here? Use go pros!
They used gopros but they failed halfway through LOL
So the thing with using film is it produces amazing images compared to digital cameras. You ever notice how old movies can get re-released and have amazing picture resolution. Politics were also involved in the 60's and nasa was given a lot of money to make the landing happen and would have tried to get the best images and videos possible in order to ensure that politicians believe the money was well spent. Imagine what a politician would think in the 60's and 70's if they approved tens of billions of dollars for nasa and they came back with shitty pictures.
@@donutactual8887 agreed. But with the camera technology we have today, even low budget cameras should give awesome space images. Funding is big so that should be a priority. Get people interested in space travel.
I'm a little confused can anyone help? I was always told the reasons you don't see stars In earth orbit and on the surface of the moon is because the brightness of of both The Moon and Earth Obscures them like lights in a stadium. But at 7:40 they are a lot more distanced. Surely we should be seeing some stars?
If you can see the surface of the Earth and Moon, what is providing the lighting?
Bonus question...when that unidentified light source is directly overhead at high noon, can you see the stars?
@@codymoe4986 ahh I see.
Any idea what the red glow at the center top of the screen at 13:30 could be..?
probably a lens flare caused by the sun
I’m not sure but it’s probably just weird light stuff with the camera.
Super!!!!!!!
Well done. Faith restored. Keep that up.
I've always been in awe of what they've done and what they're continuing to do as far as dpace exploration is concerned I've never been able to fully comprehend the magnitude of what it takes but it makes me wonder what will the future bring about for the human race ☮️
Was there a atmosphere maintained the entire flight inside Orion that could have kept a person alive?
no it was unmanned
The mission was uncrewed
Good question... I presume you mean... even though it was unmanned, was atmosphere maintained for testing purposes?
@@stragnetsmith2686not what he was asking
@@kellanroberts2785 he answered and gave the reason why.
I do believe in this footage but I do find it weird that you can see no stars
cameras are calibrate to see the big and very bright objects like the earth, the moon, the ship, but not the stars, they are too fint compare to the moon. Same reason for the pictures of apollo program. Nothing is weird if you take some times to educate your self by reading books or any other source of knowledge.
@@c.chouinard3282 I totally get that, I guess it's like when you're in a dark room and someone shines a bright light at you , you then can't see past the bright light
What is lighting the Earth, the Moon, the spacecraft?
P S. How many stars can you see at high noon? Hint...the answer is one...
simple answer:
when its day on earth, can you see stars apart from the Sun
when its night and the Sun is gone we can see them
If you live in a place where you can see stars at night try standing under a street lamp you can’t see them anymore. Just a cool little thing you can test at home.
Alhamdulillah Aamiin
and the fuel line for the thing was fixed by me with tape
Another man on the moon. FknA.
Why was the moon landing not tested?
There was no lander
BOOSTERS IGNITSGN! That will forever be saved..
Flat-earthers be like "These images are doctored up to make it look like Earth is round!"
The earth is actually a massive donut.
They had to warp the footage, you can see it in the pixels.
@@strawwagen lol
I remember the moon missions and my excitement that man was finally a spacefaring species. My science fiction addiction was being fed. I imagined, during Armstrong's moon walk that it would only be a decade or so until we went to Mars and surely, by the end of my life we would see a mission to a nearby star. Such foolish optomism! The truth became clearer during the next five decades: There never was a need to go exploring the solar system by men. At the time of Apollo, we didn't have the ability to study the moon by remote. We almost had to land in order to make sure it wasn't green cheese. Shortly after the Apollo era ended we had developed the ability to send autonomous robots to do the studies. The past five decades saw remote missions to a comet and an asteroid! Now, we've consolodated our knowledge and abilities and can return to do the things that robots can't. Maybe future robots will make man obsolete again but until that time we have a chance to dispurse mankind. This may be the way we always work, inchworming along, first with probes and then with men. Our first missions to the stars will be probes so advanced we can't conceive of them now. I curse the shortness of human life. I'd like to see the next steps. The moon is two years away, Mars, ten. I can make it that far. Pray.
So, no landing? 😔
It was an uncrewed test mission.
@@morskojvolk I hope we have a manned moon landing again
@@defenderoFreedom I'm sure we will!
Artemis 3 will be when the landings happen
Why not send one person?
Do you want to fly around the moon in a prototype that hasn't been tested? Tired of life?
Thats the next step.
Because NASA hasn't sent a solo mission to space since the Mercury program?
How can you orbit the moon at that distance when the moon is roughly hollow?
Explain?
You can orbit most things far away as long as you go slow enough and the moon or any large space body for that matter, cannot be hollow as it would cave in on itself because of gravity. The moon has a surface, a core and everything in between.
5:27 looks like a DDOS game.
What I don't understand is why it has taken so long to land on the moon again. We did it once, technology has soared since then. I don't understand why it has not been done again after all these years.
Vietnam happened, and the desire to beat the Soviets in the space race. All that took a lot of money.
Be encouraged that man is starting to go to space again. There was no political will in the late 70s and 80s and 90s until just this last decade because of private companies going to space.
There isn't any reason to go there unless you are 100% confident that you will be building a base. Sure, studying the moon closely, especially the regolith samples thought us a lot about our planet and solar system but there doesn't seem to be too much to learn left about the moon we don't know already. Of course we are open to surprises but this hasn't created the government spending incentive so far.
Now that the moon base program has started, there is indeed reason invest in the moon again!
@@kimsand53 maybe you'll go one day
@@GameNationRDFyou, me, nobody, is not going to the moon. The moon is not terra firma. The moon is a light in the sky.
@@GameNationRDF 🤣Don't bother. Either a troll or someone that thinks the earth is flat 🤣
"Boosters ignishish"
Artemis can see from the moon
The earth doesn't look flat to me..
Anyone on here that thinks that it's all CGI and that rocket launches are fake, should walk into traffic.
Jump into the ocean and feed the fishes. Hahaha. Society doesn't need them.
Traffic isn't real either.
Hahahahah wow.. you wish injury or death on people who question what the government agencies tell us. God bless you.
It’s all CGI anyone who has dug deep into this knows without a shadow of a doubt.
30B from taxpayers mandatory for some cartoons… that’s what NASA (national aquatic salvage administration) receives from us without choice. Go do some homework cause you’ve clearly done
Ahh buddy deleted his comment saying its all CGI. I literally live down the road from where the launches happen, and watch it in person. Go to Cape Canaveral for a launch and walk on from your sheppard 🐑
@@BrandonBiden69 I question your honesty.
Or chasing satellites?????
Need more smarter scientist out there
That’s crazy 😱
Throw in a few English teachers while you're at it...
Hm,you could make inhabited station at geosynchronic orbit,at 30000 kilometers high.Could be the best an investment for million years:)
NASA has plans to make a lunar space station in the late 2020s for the future Artemis programs
@@qwertyeetnext year is the start (hopefully)
BRAVO NASA
Se a trra faz dois movimentos gira no próprio eixo e dár a volta no sol a lua tem que fazer três movimentos girar no próprio eixo dar a volta na terra e no mesmo tempo dar a volta no sol isso e posiveo vejo coisa errada nesta história aí o eu sou burro mesmo kkkk
Why did you guys stop exploring the ocean and trying to bring us too Mars?
That’s crazy 😱
Because (N)ational (A)eronautics and (S)pace (A)dministration isn’t the guys who explore the ocean. They explore space and mess with planes sometimes.
You can clearly see that either meteor showers or some form of rock has hit the moon who knows when but can Guarantee we will experience the same at some point
We already do, on a daily basis.
@@markrainford1219Yeah the moon just doesn’t have an atmosphere to delete the meteors so they all hit.
If this was an unmanned mission, why were there shots of an astronaut in a chair looking out the front?
@@quetzalcoatl9162 now it makes sense! Thanks.
Testdummies
A test dummy...questioning a test dummy...
The names of Hanazuki and Kiazuki from the cartoon series Hanazuki: Full of Treasures were placed onboard the Orion spacecraft many months before this historic liftoff. I am glad that this mission was accomplished with the names of the cartoon characters other than the Snoopy plushie and a Shaun the Sheep figure.
Why don't you show where Apollo landed? You are there, it is important to show this work. This issue has been discussed for 50 years.
its been done many times over many years... check out LRO...
Why try to do that? That's not what this is about. The orbit was too high for that, too. And there are many pictures from the moon orbiters.
It hasn't been discussed, the fact that you and your echo chamber belive it was a fake doesnt mean it is a controversial topic.
Are you serious? Go educate yourself on the subject, it's not our responsibility to prove the moon landing happened. We don't have 50 years to waste on this. Just Google it.
Going nowhere since 1958 🎉
Going to the moon and space is very cool but I can not believe after 50 yrs later we are still going to space and the moon in the same way and the same type of rockets ????? In 50 yrs we did not make a better type of space craft that can go to and from space ????????
I think that's a problem, people have zero idea of what improvement looks like.
There's barely anything on the inside that is equal to Apollo, and the outside shape is the same because better and better computer simulations keep bringing us back to the same results.
Any more extreme design requires materials we don't have. Like aerospike engines, rotating detonation engines, and so on and so forth.
there's been no new invention (or really, no new physics to allow for such invention) to make other types of rocket engines.
It was all bullshit from the beginning
@@kimsand53 YEP !!!
A new conspiracy has just been born
Unbelievable studio editing! Almost looks real!
Not really
@@kimsand53 😂
For real. Looks so fake, only the hopeless scifi freaks think this is real
@@trendynow1369 how
@@O5-hans how you're a hopeless sci-fi freak? Idk how you got to this point
It is real
Without baby
er nasa there are like 2 volcanoes in papau new guniea right now ready for mining
They don’t do mines they do rockets
Where’s all the flat earthers? Lol
Hopefully they’re tired of the mental gymnastics and have moved on
Still here. If you think this is proof, you really are desperate for nasa scifi. Cringe
What is disappointing is the use of 1930s fossil-fuel propulsion technology. After all these years, I would have thought we would have come up with an alternative....
Hydrogen is not a fossil fuel.
@@morskojvolk well the hydrogen and oxidizer fuel still has a water-vapour exhaust, which is a greenhouse gas.
@@gabrieldarcy1744 Um, no, it's not. It's...water.
Hydrogen and oxygen are fossil fuels?
Or were you referring to the solid fuel in the SRBs?
unless you mean the SRB's then you seriously do not know your chemicals
Cannot leave low orbit, nice black out and animation while entering back into Earth's atmosphere, I wonder y this wasn't a consistent live feed
Came to comment section looking for retards, wasnt dissapointed. XD
Your comments are uninformed and unhelpful. Please take your baseless conspiracy theories elsewhere.
This is a highlights video lmao, it was all livestreamed
The plasma blocks all radio transmissions between ship and ground. That’s why
Game over for all flatearthers 🌜
They are just making up more lies, they will never stop until we exterminate them, earth is round and they can't handle being false
society is sick instead of giving millions and millions of dollars to pro athletes cancer researcher or great scientist who push the limit of understanding and human knowledge should receive much more money as grants and others stuffs
All of what you just listed get many times more than what NASA gets. I don't get your point, its just another facet of human progress. Just because it doesn't align with your value proposition doesn't mean its useless.
@@GameNationRDF you have to be sick between the ears to somehow think just a second that a soccer/basseball/whatever the sports athletes is worth more to society than some of the leading climate/cancer/hiv/fusion reactor researcher moving humanity forward on the most important things
@@cloudstrife7083 No I agree with you that its more important. I am just saying there will be a LOT of people who disagree with you because their value lies in somewhere else sadly.
@@GameNationRDF sorry if I misunderstood you I speak french but explain further what you mean
Let's say hypothetically there's a mass extinction event on earth that kills all humans. If we don't have a settlement on the moon that one day could become mostly self sufficient then humanity would be dead and there wouldn't be any curing cancer because there won't be a person in the first place. A base on the moon could also allow for access to higher concentrations of Helium-3 which could one day allow for commercial fusion power which would be even cleaner than nuclear fission or fossil fuels.
There are three high-tech mannequins on board Artemis with special equipment designed to test the effects of radiation on the human body. Wait. Didn't real people actually go to the moon several decades ago. WTF
Nikdy jsme neletěli na Měsíc. Plán JFK byl příliš mimo skutečné schopnosti 20. století.
We also put asbestos in everything yes
@Quetzalcoatl
But we sent astronauts to the moon and back 50 years ago. We know the effects of radiation. Don't we???
Also we don't need to send mannequins to space. We can recreate radiation right here on earth
@Quetzalcoatl
What outer space tests were conducted to test the effects of shielding and radiation during the apollo program. I mean they knew about the van Allan belts already.
@Quetzalcoatl
So basically you're saying they used data collected by unmanned probes and the like, which clearly worked because the astronauts suffered no ill effects. So why all of a sudden to we need to send mannequins into space to assess what we already know
Why does it look so fake?
Probably because you forgot to put on your glasses, your vision right now is as clouded as your mind is with all the conspiracy bullshit bottled up in there
Because all the “fake” images are real and when they look the same they look the same.
wait. so your telling me they didnt even land on the moon? what was even the whole point of all this?!
They are yanking your chain
Testing prior to a crewed mission.
Its called propaganda mate.
No one has been to the moon in like 50 years, they had to test the route with up to date technology, it took readings along the way and the capsule was pressurized to confirm that equipment can sustain a crew.
Who told you they went to land? The mission was to test the technology and systems before sending a crew.
The only reason were going is for the minerals the chinese are ahead of us
I Wana eat the moon rock
@@O5-hansMe too. They say it tastes like crackers
I come just to hear the cringe-worthy slogans at take off and landing.
This is a good launch and test run; however, NASA is utilizing 60s and 70s space technology. This is unacceptable in this day and age. We have congress to thank for all the budget cuts over the years. This year, NASA requested only $26 billion from the federal government. If NASA would like to achieve true greatness, they'll need to request a lot more than $26 billion. A manned mission to MARS is scheduled to launch in the 2030s. NASA will need sufficient funds to make this dream come reality. Nuclear Propulsion is the answer!
Nuclear Propulsion was in its development stage in the mid 1950s. Budget cuts and the fear of another large scale nuclear explosion halted the project. Nuclear Propulsion will cut the travel time to Mars to 90 days or less. During nuclear propulsion development, there were talks about interplanetary travel and even interstellar travel. Let's face it. Chemical propulsion via rockets is yesterday's space tech and it has its limits.
Also, entering back to Earth via crew module? I was under the impression that NASA had an upgraded version of this and not something they used since the Apollo missions. This mission costed billions to achieve but I cannot help that we've stagnated due to budget cuts. Unless NASA develops new tech, we're not leaving this planet. Ask for more money.
We need a president that will care about space, we need a new JFK but without the mind-blowing
They've had a long time to scrub all the video and photos of alien bases.
Don't need to, they're invisible.
@@markrainford1219so invisible that they don’t exist
Hahaha funny.
This is faker than a $3 bill. Cmon people, i know you want hope in your precious scifi, but you really going to believe this crap? Cmon...
Your ignorance of science, history, and evidence-based reasoning is quite apparent in the comments you have posted on this video. I suggest you take some time to educate yourself on the facts and evidence associated with space exploration and the Moon landing before making further baseless comments about a significant moment in history.
@@strawwagen no one has or will go to the moon.
Again, enjoy your scifi dreams. Your religion is scientism
@@trendynow1369 no argument? Believe your stupid religion and brainwashing conspiracy propaganda but leave us normal people out of it
@@strawwagen your ad hominem makes the whole prospect of men on the moon fake and dumb and gay
@@trendynow1369 I know you don't think this was real. But I'm curious can you at least concede on the possibility of reaching the Moon if you take into consideration our current technology, knowledge about orbital mechanics and knowledge of the parameters of the Earth and the Moon ? And if not do you at least believe that we can take an object really high up and then keep it from falling back by accelerating it parralel to the Earth so that it keeps missing the surface ? I'm just curious about which part you think is sci - fi.
So, what do we have? The United States declares itself the only space hegemon, and assigns itself the role of managing the entire outer space. Those countries who are ready to recognize their authority and obey, they will allow space exploration within the limits allowed by the United States. And they will even help them a little, if the role assigned to them requires it, and correspond to the interests of the United States. And to those who disagree with this state of affairs, the United States actually declares a space war. This is what they call: the Artemis program. Russia and China have already been declared enemies in advance, and a law has been passed on countering and prohibiting cooperation between the Russian and Chinese space programs. That is, the United States professes the principle: who is not with us, is against us! And as we can see, this is their approach in everything, whether it's water, land, sky, or space. I'm afraid that with this approach, sooner or later, they will no longer start a cold war, which is already underway, but will unleash a full-fledged third World war.
Nice CGI. The Moon is not a Rock. None of this will make it into 4th Density. 💯
Ok mj
CGI isn’t all that great. Oh my, what people believe is real………..
@@kimsand53 That's great, coming from someone who clearly has no brain.
@@michaelclentworth1283 anyone with a brain would know that no one has been to the moon
@@kimsand53 No. With reason, you know exactly that you have been to the moon. The evidence is irrefutable.
This is so cap
Why is the US spending 890 Bil in military weapons while NASA's budget is around 30Bil? ...😔😔😔😔.... not to mention there are places in the country without water and power...😒😒😒
Because humans will never reach a point of actually trusting each other and having similar goals.
lol