20 years ago I heard Zig Ziglar comment that today’s cheapness of life shouldn’t be surprising when we teach young people that “You came from the goo, went to the zoo, and then became you.”
@generoshin9261 That is such a dishonest quote. I, and many other sthiests, value live incredibly because we know one day the lights go out and that's it. I make the most of every day, have as much fun with my friends and family, try to make a difference where I can and hope that my limited time here made a difference to someone else. It's the only one I get so I'm not taking it for granted.
@@richardgregory3684 ***correction, yes everyone is mortal but the spiritual component of everyone is eternal, yes it is what a believing tells, whoever happens to be a religious person.***
Only one symbol...the cross, represents the sacrifice of God for the sins of mankind so that man can be cleaned of original sin and be restored in fellowship with God.
I knew a guy in the army. I got called in to work for him, he said he had to go because his wife was having a baby. I said congradulations I didn't know your wife was pregnant. Then he said "yeah neither did I!"
@@enzogamerukbr as with my comment, I think my meaning is pretty darn clear. Unfortunately you have now worn out my patience which, admittedly, is already very thin. Don’t expect anymore goodwill responses for me 👋🏻
"Evolutionists are NUTS." Too bad that isn't a thing. You understand your silly superstition is not supportable, right? Let's make this clear: Every Ivy League college offers a PhD path in evolutionary biology (science). Your plagiarized third hand translation of iron age fables can be contrasted here as only a beLIEf. Can you see the difference now?
@@asphalthedgehog6580 "If the only books you ever read are Harry Potter you probably believe in it." Maybe that's the problem with creationists here. They limit what they know to iron age fables.
Regardless of my opinion on the termination of human life, my view is "Christ came into the world not to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through Him."
@@umvhu do you know what the two resurrections are in rev 20? The second one is resurrected to judgment. Rev 20: v12. And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is [the book] of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.
THEY hypothesize about that stuff because they have really really studied it in great detail......not because of their world view......can you say the same when you criticize their hypotheses?
Well this is demonstrably false. Evolution is one of the best understood scientific processes ever. In 2024 to deny it is complete willful ignorance and/or dishonest assertion.
@@Johnny_Eh-theist Well this is demonstrably false. Evolution is one of the best understood scientific processes ever. BUT the theory of evolution is based on common descent and a hypothetical organism. thus hasnt been proven. thanks for conflating the two. although it might be the first time you are learning about the difference in 2024 or almost 200 years later.
@@HS-zk5nn _BUT the theory of evolution is based on common descent and a hypothetical organism. thus hasnt been proven._ No, evolution is just the changes in heritable characteristsics in biological populations over successive generation _PMSL_ No doubt you think that an invisible magic wizard casting a spell 6000 years ago is more likely.
Wrong. Newer data just allowed us to more accurately establish the time of the Chicxulub impactor. The error range of the old data still covers the newer more accurate measurement. Old data 65.5 +/- 1 million years New data 66.038 +/- 0.011 million years.
@@NJHProductions512 that is some backwards logic. Using guns to protect from guns 🤦♂️. American children are dying from guns bottom line and they have been for decades so in fact Americans have chose guns over children.
@@wingednut2283it’s not backwards logic at all; it’s not protection from guns; guns don’t kill people, people kill people. The people I know have guns because they love their families and don’t want to be defenseless when someone comes in wishing harm upon them. And it works, their families are safe.
@@NJHProductions512 guns arent sentient if that is what you assume i think, they are tools used to kill in the hands of a person that can be on purpose or by accident. I love my family and wouod still defend them without a gun mostly because i know the person breaking into my house will not have a gun. Do guns work to keep families safe... if we looked up the statistics for prevented home invasions vs accidental home shootings or purposeful. You might change your mind.
I don't know whether that woman was lying or not when she claimed that she didn't know she was pregnant (and how would that excuse murdering her baby?!?). But I have a friend who didn't know she was pregnant with her first child until he was on the way out. She was seventeen, unmarried, petite and very slender; she just carried very 'small' and apparently didn't notice any of the usual indicators of pregnancy.
I was a baby like that, my mom was 16, didn't gain any weight, didn't miss a period for like 6 months....she got quite a surprise. Was there not a show on TLC about not knowing they were pregnant? Like seasons of this show
Plants use many ways to transport their seed. Small plant eaters will move from place to place deficating the seeds as the expanded their travel thus placing seeds and fertiliser in a progressive path to new growth areas as well as hurricane force winds and land flooding into rivers and the sea.
Theres a giant fossilized sea turtle on the top of Mt. Cheaha which is the highest point in my state😂 I have pictures 😮in case local government decides to hide evidence of biblical flood in my area 😂❤
@@bighairyviking387 According to a scientifically plausible theory regarding the Great Flood, there actually was a dramatic shift of Earth's tectonic plates during the flood. Try harder.
Well this is demonstrably false. Why do you need to keep lying. But to have a little fun. If dinosaurs lived with people and died in the flood, where are the human fossils?
Motherhood doesn’t ruin a career. I should know cause I had both and absolutely loved it cause it made my life better with kids ❤. I simply don’t understand why people wouldn’t want children
We can trust God's word over man's word Hebrews 4:12 For the word of God is living and active, sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing to the division of soul and of spirit, of joints and of marrow, and discerning the thoughts and intentions of the heart. Matthew 4:4 But he answered, “It is written, “‘Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that comes from the mouth of God.’” Psalm 119:105 Your word is a lamp to my feet and a light to my path. John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 Timothy 3:16-17 All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.
***the Word of God that I hear, yes I understand and trust, but the word of God that you hear is no longer the word of God alone it is also what you are telling. You know I am a skeptic, an agnostic and a pragmatic. ***
@@adelinomorte7421 In 1910 Ivan Panin, a Russian/ American Harvard math genius and linguistic expert, proved the Bible mathematically. Watch - Math proves the Bible. Most recently a 30 year veteran cold case criminologist J. Warner Wallace proved the Bible forensically in his book, Person of Interest. His testimony would convince any jury of the veracity of the Bible. Some of the amazing things in the Bible include the prophecy of the fall of Tyre and the prophecy of Alexander the great. Bible firsts include knowing life being in the blood long before modern science, or the Bible knowing about mountains and currents in the oceans or how the earth hangs on nothing. You should know about the prophecies fulfilled by Jesus and the impossible odds of that happening. The Bible is a reliable collection of historical documents written down by eye witnesses during the lifetime of other eye witnesses. They report to us supernatural events that took place in fulfillment of specific prophecies and claim that the writings are divine rather than human in origin. The Bible has also been proven archaeologically, historically and linguistically. 2 Peter 1:16 For we have not followed cunningly devised fables, when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty.
"Did these paleontologist experts forget most dinosaurs were not very big?" Kid, none of these folks are paleontologists. You might want to consult actual scientists before belittling education well beyond your feeble comprension.
@@oscaralegre3683 "consult to paleontologist? like if that is easy to find" Easier to find than your imaginary friend, you might want to stop playing games.
@@bighairyviking387 In 1910 Ivan Panin, a Russian/ American Harvard math genius and linguistic expert, proved the Bible mathematically. Watch - Math proves the Bible. Most recently a 30 year veteran cold case criminologist J. Warner Wallace proved the Bible forensically in his book, Person of Interest. His testimony would convince any jury of the veracity of the Bible. Some of the amazing things in the Bible include the prophecy of the fall of Tyre and the prophecy of Alexander the great. Bible firsts include knowing life being in the blood long before modern science, or the Bible knowing about mountains and currents in the oceans or how the earth hangs on nothing. You should know about the prophecies fulfilled by Jesus and the impossible odds of that happening. The Bible is a reliable collection of historical documents written down by eye witnesses during the lifetime of other eye witnesses. They report to us supernatural events that took place in fulfillment of specific prophecies and claim that the writings are divine rather than human in origin. The Bible has also been proven archaeologically, historically and linguistically. 2 Peter 1:16 For we have not followed cunningly devised fables, when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty.
@@Johnny_Eh-theist You didn't watch the video clearly. You came to the video, paused it immediately before it began, and went straight to the comments.
@@DemocratPartyOfGaslightingI watched the dumpster fire of ipse dixit fallacies, strawman, straight up lies and pooh pooh fallacies, but I asked you about your specific evidence that made you a Christian. Completely separate from the show
@@fatalisticsandwich7789 Yeah, sounds like it. You basically ignore the evidence presented and just do the very thing you're claiming creationists do. "Nuh-uh." The irony is 🤌.
@@mattrondeau7466 lol what are you even talking about? What evidence have I ignored? You might be projecting here. I could always be wrong, I’m certainly not perfect, but I don’t remember any evidence being presented in this video. It is just dueling narratives
that's not a speculation.. That's fiction.. something that no one ever witnessed it or observed.. That's just pure out of imagination.. Fiction.. Even common people could do that,..what scientist! 😂😂
Only Jesus saves Acts 4:12 Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to mankind by which we must be saved.” Jesus is the only way to salvation and eternal life John 14:6 Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. To follow Jesus means leaving everything behind Matthew 8:18-22 When Jesus saw the crowd around him, he gave orders to cross to the other side of the lake. 19 Then a teacher of the law came to him and said, “Teacher, I will follow you wherever you go.” 20 Jesus replied, “Foxes have dens and birds have nests, but the Son of Man has no place to lay his head.” 21 Another disciple said to him, “Lord, first let me go and bury my father.” 22 But Jesus told him, “Follow me, and let the dead bury their own dead.”
***most of the comments below are pure ignorance, in first place ignorance about the bible and God, then ignorance about everything about life and believing; but the worst is, the followers are fooled, and the leaders gain with it, leaders and followers know all about it and let themselves go on it, otherwise they will feel lost and in their ignorance can not find any log to survive, but if you study GOD by yourself without any bias you will find the true salvation. ***
I love the way religious people deride the evolutionarily "fairytale" and then talk about an unprovable sky fairy. Where's your evidence for god? And please dont say his word is the bible. Who wrote the bible? Cristians are masters of circular reasoning.
In 1910 Ivan Panin, a Russian/ American Harvard math genius and linguistic expert (and ex-atheist) proved the Bible mathematically. Watch - Math proves the Bible. Most recently a 30 year veteran cold case criminologist J. Warner Wallace proved the Bible forensically in his book, Person of Interest. His testimony would convince any jury of the veracity of the Bible. Some of the amazing things in the Bible include the prophecy of the fall of Tyre and the prophecy of Alexander the great. Bible firsts include knowing life being in the blood long before modern science, or the Bible knowing about mountains and currents in the oceans or how the earth hangs on nothing. You should know about the prophecies fulfilled by Jesus and the impossible odds of that happening. The Bible is a reliable collection of historical documents written down by eye witnesses during the lifetime of other eye witnesses. They report to us supernatural events that took place in fulfillment of specific prophecies and claim that the writings are divine rather than human in origin. The Bible has also been proven archaeologically, historically and linguistically. 2 Peter 1:16 For we have not followed cunningly devised fables, when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty.
With all do respect, the Bible stories happened about 4000 years ago... dinosaurs didn't get extinct when Noah was hanging around, but millions of years ago... So how does the fact Noah had grapes has any connection to this theory???
How did these people know about the dinosaurs, from the Bible? They are not there in the Bible, even Noah didn't have them in his cargo list. A chapter should be added to the Bible - Adam, Eve and the dinosaurs.
@@Johnny_Eh-theist think about it, it’s tail is like a cedar tree. That’s a pretty big, thick tail. Ya kinda need to translate it from the biblical language
@@Johnny_Eh-theist ok your right, their not very big but neither were the dinosaurs. People think all dinosaurs were so much bigger but they were not, but they were a bit bigger and definitely stronger than some of the other animals. I think talking about all this is awesome. We can learn together. I’m willing to admit I could be wrong. After all I wasn’t there at the time but definitely thank you for talking to me about it. This is cool of you, very cool thanks
Where was the dad? Considering modern women, she might not even know his last name. It's funny to me how feminism has trained society to find some way to absolve, or at least lessen, the accountability of women. Not one of her excuses would have even been considered had a man done this, and the mother doing it to her own child is the greater betrayal. Nor would the man have been given such a lenient sentence, and you know she'll get out early on parole.
If dinosaurs lived 65/66 million years ago, some questions: This is your worldview: 1) Dinosaurs lived 65 million years ago, man didn't exist with them, and some catastrophic event occurred (asteroid/change in atmospheric conditions/a n other - take your pick), and wiped all the dinosaurs out. If this is the case, how did all the other mammals survive? Why could they live with the dinosaurs, then the "event" occurred, and the smaller animals survived in the new atmosphere? And, I'm guessing, your primate was one of the surviving animals, which then evolved into man? Or 2) Dinosaurs lived 65 million years ago WITH man. Then the "event" happened. How did mankind survive, and the dinosaurs didn't? Or 3) Dinosaurs lived on earth, something happened to wipe them out, every animal died, then life began again, and your "miracle" bacteria starting producing life again. This begs the question - why? And also how did the dinosaurs' life begin, before the event which wiped them out? Did this miracle bacteria make the dinosaurs, they got wiped out, then the miracle bacteria started to make life again, following the death of the dinosaurs? The "event" points to a flood. Dinosaurs are buried in sedimentary rock, often in the death pose, with their heads twisted backwards, gasping for their last breath. If these huge creatures drowned, how did man survive? Next, the word "pre historic." Prehistoric simply means "before historical records." Historians refer to ancient Mesopotamia as the cradle of civilisation - it's where all the ancient writings are found, and these date back circa 4000 - 5000 years old This area is also referred to the fertile crescent, in, and around the Nile, and Egypt. If, by accepting one of the 3 points above, why did the dinosaurs die out, man suddenly become clever in one area on earth, and was able to communicate his ideas in writings etc? Where did Egypt come from, and why is it called Egypt? Where do the Canaanites come from, and why are they referenced as such? And why did the "evolving man" shed all his fur, then got cold, and decided he needed fur to keep warm? How did man discover fire, and why, as an evolved primate, was he not scared of it, as are every other animals on earth? Lastly, if the dinosaurs were wiped out millions of years ago, and man is relatively young (as in your worldview, man evolved over millions/hundreds of thousands of years) where are all the skeletons for each step of the evolutionary process, and how old is mankind?
Mammals certainly co-existed with dinosaurs. How did they survive? Because the mammals were all small, could generate their own body heat, many were scavengers and insect eaters, and many lived in underground burrows. These were advantages in the period after the asteroid impact: burrows provided protection, and mammals can survive sudden cold, giant reptiles who needed a constant supply of vast quantities of food could not. There was plenty of carrion and insects. Lots of mammals died out too. And species more acient than dinosaurs survived - corcodilians for example: their slow metablism, sheltering in water etc enabled them to live through it. Gumans did not live alongside the dinosaurs We're veyr much later than them (though, technically, birds are dinosaurs, of a sort). Humans adapted to live on plains, and to be persistence hunter tool users. A human can outrun almost any animal over long periods. We can sweat over out entire skins, and have virtually no fur, so we los eheat very efficiently. We do not run quickly, but can maintain it for days (some African tribes still do this). Humans invented clothes so they could migrate to cold areas their natural bodies are unsuited to. Humans are instinctively afraid of fire, but we use our intelligence to overcome that fear. Dead dinosaurs have arched necks and backs because of contracture of the back muscles and spine post mortem. This effect is seen n modern dead aniamls too.
Basically all species which massed over 100kg went extinct. Smaller animals including birds, mammals, reptiles, insects, etc. survived because they could live by scavenging until the ecosystems recovered.
@@richardgregory3684 But your answer makes no sense. It is full of holes and you haven't addressed key points. "the mammals were all small, could generate their own body heat, many were scavengers and insect eaters, and many lived in underground burrows. These were advantages in the period after the asteroid impact: burrows provided protection, and mammals can survive sudden cold, giant reptiles who needed a constant supply of vast quantities of food could not. " Straight away, this sentence alone contradicts the *official* narrative. According to the American Museum of Natural History, "To explain what caused this mass extinction, scientists have focused on events that would have altered our planet's climate in dramatic, powerful ways. The leading theory is that a huge asteroid or comet slammed into Earth 65 million years ago, blocking sunlight, changing the climate and setting off global wildfires." So the sun was blocked (cold atmosphere), but fires persisted (heat???). Fires burn things. How come the dinosaur skeletons aren't destroyed, and what exactly buried them? If you die where you die, earth doesn't suddenly bury you. Your "scavengers" would consume your carcass, and the bones themselves. Hmmm
@@marcj3682 (facepalm) Dinosaurs were living, dying, being buried and being fossilized for over 180 million years before the Chicxulub impact caused extinction.
@@marcj3682 _So the sun was blocked (cold atmosphere), but fires persisted (heat???). Fires burn things_ How long do you think the fires would have burnt? Sheesh, a forest burns for a few hours or days - the blockage on sunlight woul dhave persistem for months, or even years. And a forest fire wouldn;t be enugh to heat the whole world, just locally. More, the smoke and particulates would have blocked even more sunlight, intensifying and prolonging the cold. That;s a major factor in the nuclear winter scenarios. And of course, if the vegetation burned, the plant-eaters would have died out. And then the carnovires that ate the plant eaters. _How come the dinosaur skeletons aren't destroyed, and what exactly buried them_ You know that dinosaurs existed for many millions of years, right? They were around long, long before they died out. Most of the dinosaurs fossils we unearth today did NOT die in that event. but long before it. And no, most scavengers do NOT eat bones. They pick the flesh off them. Tere are few anials today that specifically eat bone; it is unsually only eaten incidentally (by predators that eat their prey whole, or or large pieces) or eaten only in very small amounts, many aniamls will eat or chew on small amounts of bone for the minerals.
Believe me when I tell you that the grapes of the late Cretaceous were much different than the grapes of today (especially since mankind has tinkered with grape genes).....you people are so hiarious.
The age of the earth is not something forced on scientists because of evolution. Long before Darwin, geologists had estimated an age of the earth in millions of years. As geology has advanced, the estimated age of the earth hasn't gotten younger, it has gotten older. So you can't just deny biology, you also have to deny physics, geology, chemistry, cosmology, and all the related sciences. The problem for you is that those sciences have been so successful in helping us understand the earth, and the universe we live in. For good or for bad, nothing of the modern world would exist if those sciences were wrong.
Some people will come to God this time on earth. Most will come to him after the millennial reign. They will never accept Him before. Jesus says this few find the gate on the narrow path. And many call me Lord in vain. And no matter what evidence you give them they will not accept it.
@@ianmonk6211 You are certainly entitled to believe what you believe, My argument isn't against " believers", it is against believers who either deny science, or present their beliefs as supported by science.
@@earth9531 Which doesn't really affect the age of the earth. And, in fact, uniformitarianism was abandoned long ago. The movement of the earth's crust is reasonable well known nowadays, and informs us as to the history of the earth.
As a Christian, I would like to offer piece of advice: You will not stop abortions or help those young lost souls by spewing judgement from your pseudo-scientific podium. Give Ceasar that which belongs to him, and give to God what is Godly. True followers of Christ do not judge their sisters and brethren, neither do they promote hate of those who aren’t believers. Do not tarnish God’s work by mixing your own agenda with the Scripture. True Christians are stewards for the lost, shelter for the downtrodden, source of strength and hope for the weak. Instead of this lecturing, show people mercy, stretch out your hand, and refrain from unjust judgement. Who are you to cast your stones?!
@@bighairyviking387 l évolutionnistmest un mensonge,cela n a jamais été observé c est juste une opinion que les scientistes évolutionnistes ont modélisés pareils pour le big-bang et pour l âge de l univers,ils ne supporte pas l idée d un Dieu créateur tout puissant c est pour cela qu ils ce perdent dans des théories fumeuse et tordus c est une non science
@@christophesutter1844 «ils ne supporte pas l idée d un Dieu créateur » wich one, easter bunny? stop liyng and try learn something instead spreading lies about evolution. try read biology 101
@@chilltarts Please explain how radiocaron dating works in your own words. Please include your explanation of how radiocarbon is calibrated by over a dozen non-radiometric dating proxies back to 55,000 YBP.
@@chilltarts If you used Carbon-14 to date rocks in the Grand Canyon (millions of years old), it would give you inaccurate findings. Uranium-Lead would be needed in this example.
@@chilltarts no I had not but the ideas that they start with evolution and then say the world is old is flat out wrong Even if you disagree with their methods for determining They do use carbon dating and isotopes dating and rock sediment layers and a combination of those things tells them how old roughly the earth or in this case grape seeds are You can disagree with the claim based on the evidence and the method achieved But you can’t say they are doing it because they believe in evolution when they are saying it’s cause of carbon dating ect
Psalms 14:1 NKJV [1] The fool has said in his heart, “There is no God.” They are corrupt, They have done abominable works, There is none who does good.
Evolution and creationism.what ? No other ways of seeing things? Also,it just got to be that there is a personal person god? No other perceptions at all?. Think,seek.
@@DemocratPartyOfGaslightingcare to elaborate on this? Quite the assertion. It seems the athiest community in this comment section has far more to say then the YEC
When attempting to critique a theory of the nature world it would behoove you to not insist on appealing to a super natural being... 😅 The pretentious tone carried out in these videos is not something shared in the explanation of natural causes by the scientific community in regard to your theist perspective.
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth... Gen1. God said that. I think that qualifies Him to be part of the discussion. Science can't define anything past a guess. It's highest reference is probably. Science makes for a poor god.
You have people who believe the earth is about 6 thousand, then some say billions. Who is right? The earth is billions of years old, not thousands. The Bible tells us this if you take it back to its original meaning. We have problems understanding the Word. Just pray for knowledge so you won't misslead others. For that is a sin also.
@@potatosoup8019 Pretty sure comes from the idea that Ancient Isrealites had different cultures than what we have now, and when I saw culture I mean like overall culture and not 'group' culture. Take the "ill be there in 5 mins" as an example. Its part of culture of our time, which basically means "ill be there shortly". I personally believe it, which makes a lot more sense.
The earth is 6000 years old, Evolutionists create a fictional timeline of billions of years based on the fossils and rock layers laid down by Noahs flood
20 years ago I heard Zig Ziglar comment that today’s cheapness of life shouldn’t be surprising when we teach young people that “You came from the goo, went to the zoo, and then became you.”
The one thing that would lower the value of life more than anything would be the idea that everyone is immortal. Which is what religions say.
@generoshin9261
That is such a dishonest quote. I, and many other sthiests, value live incredibly because we know one day the lights go out and that's it. I make the most of every day, have as much fun with my friends and family, try to make a difference where I can and hope that my limited time here made a difference to someone else. It's the only one I get so I'm not taking it for granted.
They murdered people by the millions in past millenia.....do you really think today is any different.....
@@richardgregory3684 ***correction, yes everyone is mortal but the spiritual component of everyone is eternal, yes it is what a believing tells, whoever happens to be a religious person.***
Every religion has its symbol.
Christianity: ✝️
Islam: 🕋
Atheism:🐒
Hinduism: 🐄
Yazidism: 🦚
@kattykitters5310I'd give you 100 thumbs up if I could
Only one symbol...the cross, represents the sacrifice of God for the sins of mankind so that man can be cleaned of original sin and be restored in fellowship with God.
Reject humanity
Return to monke
A lack of belief = a belief.... so much cope
Don’t forget evolution 🦧
I knew a guy in the army. I got called in to work for him, he said he had to go because his wife was having a baby. I said congradulations I didn't know your wife was pregnant. Then he said "yeah neither did I!"
She thought a baby might ruin her career so she murdered the baby, thus ruining her career.
That’s what believing lies does to us. Satan is the father of lies and his goal is to steal, kill, and destroy.
@@enzogamerukbr what don’t you understand about my very simple comment?
@@enzogamerukbr as with my comment, I think my meaning is pretty darn clear. Unfortunately you have now worn out my patience which, admittedly, is already very thin. Don’t expect anymore goodwill responses for me 👋🏻
The fact that a mother would even consider that breaks my heart.
Evolutionists are NUTS. Pray for em. Darwin wrong, Bible true, Jesus saves. Love yall.
"Evolutionists are NUTS." Too bad that isn't a thing. You understand your silly superstition is not supportable, right? Let's make this clear:
Every Ivy League college offers a PhD path in evolutionary biology (science). Your plagiarized third hand translation of iron age fables can be contrasted here as only a beLIEf. Can you see the difference now?
If the only books you ever read are Harry Potter you probably believe in it.
@@asphalthedgehog6580 "If the only books you ever read are Harry Potter you probably believe in it." Maybe that's the problem with creationists here. They limit what they know to iron age fables.
I think Harry Potter is easier to believe than Noah’s story
@@frosted1030science confirms the Bible. It doesn't disprove it. It takes greater faith to be an evolutionist than a creationist.
Y'all couldn't debunk a sleepy kid late for breakfast at summer camp.
🤣
The third story is evidence of evolution! A mother evolved into a monster.
Sure. Evidence for devolution.
Regardless of my opinion on the termination of human life, my view is
"Christ came into the world not to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through Him."
@@umvhu do you know what the two resurrections are in rev 20? The second one is resurrected to judgment. Rev 20: v12. And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is [the book] of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.
I'll go with that statement.
@@ianmonk6211 according to their works.....so Catholicism is correct afterall.....Christianity IS INDEED A WORKS BASED RELIGION......
@@daviddavenport9350 lol they are the whore of Babylon as Daniel 7:25 describes them along with rev 17
He's waiting until his next visit to do the judging, though, correct?
THEY hypothesize about that stuff because they have really really studied it in great detail......not because of their world view......can you say the same when you criticize their hypotheses?
Sorry, I feel sorry for the baby, not the mother who murdered it.
First of all the earth is not as old as they claim. Second, this theory is hilarious; grapes have always been around 😂😂
Recite your credentials for us teresa.......if you have beyond a Bachelor's degree, I would be most surprised.
"Second, this theory is hilarious; grapes have always been around" Based on personal knowledge/observation? I mean, you can say things...
***so! you claim that the earth is young, prove it scientifically not by believing, you know that we can believing in lies. ***
Yahweh bless you brothers and sisters in Jesus Christ 🙏 🙌.
it doesnt have to be debunked. evolution was never "bunked"- ie proven in the first place.
Well this is demonstrably false. Evolution is one of the best understood scientific processes ever. In 2024 to deny it is complete willful ignorance and/or dishonest assertion.
@@Johnny_Eh-theist Well this is demonstrably false. Evolution is one of the best understood scientific processes ever.
BUT the theory of evolution is based on common descent and a hypothetical organism. thus hasnt been proven.
thanks for conflating the two. although it might be the first time you are learning about the difference in 2024 or almost 200 years later.
@@Johnny_Eh-theist "Evolution is one of the best understood scientific processes ever"
PMSL.
@@HS-zk5nn _BUT the theory of evolution is based on common descent and a hypothetical organism. thus hasnt been proven._
No, evolution is just the changes in heritable characteristsics in biological populations over successive generation
_PMSL_
No doubt you think that an invisible magic wizard casting a spell 6000 years ago is more likely.
@@HS-zk5nn evolution is observable.
2023 dinosaur extinct 65 million years ago, 2024 dinosaur extinct 66 million year ago. In 1 year we have adder 1 million years. Well done
Wrong. Newer data just allowed us to more accurately establish the time of the Chicxulub impactor. The error range of the old data still covers the newer more accurate measurement.
Old data 65.5 +/- 1 million years
New data 66.038 +/- 0.011 million years.
@@sciencerules2825bro don’t even try, these folks are lost in science and the bible
Nope, its been like that for a WHILE
Achieving more precise estimates with new data is how science works. Duh.
@@jockyoung4491 true
Canada could learn something from the ants
11:56 they treat infants as accessories now days 😔
An Americans choose guns over kids so the logic plays out
@@wingednut2283where I come from (in America) we use guns to protect our children, so it’s not a matter of guns over children.
@@NJHProductions512 that is some backwards logic. Using guns to protect from guns 🤦♂️. American children are dying from guns bottom line and they have been for decades so in fact Americans have chose guns over children.
@@wingednut2283it’s not backwards logic at all; it’s not protection from guns; guns don’t kill people, people kill people. The people I know have guns because they love their families and don’t want to be defenseless when someone comes in wishing harm upon them. And it works, their families are safe.
@@NJHProductions512 guns arent sentient if that is what you assume i think, they are tools used to kill in the hands of a person that can be on purpose or by accident.
I love my family and wouod still defend them without a gun mostly because i know the person breaking into my house will not have a gun.
Do guns work to keep families safe... if we looked up the statistics for prevented home invasions vs accidental home shootings or purposeful. You might change your mind.
I like grapes.
I like trains.
I like water
I don't know whether that woman was lying or not when she claimed that she didn't know she was pregnant (and how would that excuse murdering her baby?!?). But I have a friend who didn't know she was pregnant with her first child until he was on the way out. She was seventeen, unmarried, petite and very slender; she just carried very 'small' and apparently didn't notice any of the usual indicators of pregnancy.
I was a baby like that, my mom was 16, didn't gain any weight, didn't miss a period for like 6 months....she got quite a surprise. Was there not a show on TLC about not knowing they were pregnant? Like seasons of this show
Plants use many ways to transport their seed. Small plant eaters will move from place to place deficating the seeds as the expanded their travel thus placing seeds and fertiliser in a progressive path to new growth areas as well as hurricane force winds and land flooding into rivers and the sea.
Theres a giant fossilized sea turtle on the top of Mt. Cheaha which is the highest point in my state😂 I have pictures 😮in case local government decides to hide evidence of biblical flood in my area 😂❤
Cool!
Or maybe plate tectonics could explain its presence far more plausibly.
Plate tectonics. If the "flood" was true, all fossils wold be mixed together is a single layer. They aren't.
@@bighairyviking387 NOT!
@@bighairyviking387 According to a scientifically plausible theory regarding the Great Flood, there actually was a dramatic shift of Earth's tectonic plates during the flood. Try harder.
Keep your head up brother! We are with you!
Oh yeah! I think if you don’t want kids, don’t mess around 😊
"If you start with the wrong assumptions, you get the wrong conclusion."
I can't handle the irony in this being a common saying over at AIG
Genesis 1:28- "Be fruitful and multiply and REPLENISH THE EARTH". 3 earth and heaven ages II Peter 3:5-7.
your grasp of cosmology is truly astounding!
The earth is 6000 years old by fact
Nope
@@alphabeta1337
Oh look who's back to the dishonest posts with absolutely 0 evidence. Embarassing
Haters gonna hate
Correct! The words "day and night" are very conclusive.
NOPE
Dinosaurs became fossils during Noahs flood
Well this is demonstrably false. Why do you need to keep lying.
But to have a little fun. If dinosaurs lived with people and died in the flood, where are the human fossils?
But no cows or rhinos or tigers or any othe rmodern animal. Funny that.
But you say dinosaurs lived with people, where are the human fossils?
@@Johnny_Eh-theist
Some 65 million years in the future.
And the Easter Bunny brought me candy....
I wonder how many of them read the articles they talk about? Why don't they say how the authors of the articles came to their conclusions?
Because if they actually mentioned what was in the articles or who wrote them it would be way easier to debunk their surface level assertions.
“Grapes evolved into grapes and dogs evolved into dogs” man, these scientists are so smart!!!
Motherhood doesn’t ruin a career. I should know cause I had both and absolutely loved it cause it made my life better with kids ❤. I simply don’t understand why people wouldn’t want children
because their heart is desperately wicked, who can know it?
Because they’re from USA
A new dinosaur gets discovered
Christians: oh no now we have to fit it in our book
We can trust God's word over man's word
Hebrews 4:12
For the word of God is living and active, sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing to the division of soul and of spirit, of joints and of marrow, and discerning the thoughts and intentions of the heart.
Matthew 4:4
But he answered, “It is written, “‘Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that comes from the mouth of God.’”
Psalm 119:105
Your word is a lamp to my feet and a light to my path.
John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
2 Timothy 3:16-17
All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.
***the Word of God that I hear, yes I understand and trust, but the word of God that you hear is no longer the word of God alone it is also what you are telling. You know I am a skeptic, an agnostic and a pragmatic. ***
@@adelinomorte7421 there are only two voices in this world. The voice of God and the voice of Satan.
@@adelinomorte7421
In 1910 Ivan Panin, a Russian/ American Harvard math genius and linguistic expert, proved the Bible mathematically. Watch - Math proves the Bible. Most recently a 30 year veteran cold case criminologist J. Warner Wallace proved the Bible forensically in his book, Person of Interest. His testimony would convince any jury of the veracity of the Bible. Some of the amazing things in the Bible include the prophecy of the fall of Tyre and the prophecy of Alexander the great. Bible firsts include knowing life being in the blood long before modern science, or the Bible knowing about mountains and currents in the oceans or how the earth hangs on nothing. You should know about the prophecies fulfilled by Jesus and the impossible odds of that happening. The Bible is a reliable collection of historical documents written down by eye witnesses during the lifetime of other eye witnesses. They report to us supernatural events that took place in fulfillment of specific prophecies and claim that the writings are divine rather than human in origin. The Bible has also been proven archaeologically, historically and linguistically.
2 Peter 1:16 For we have not followed cunningly devised fables, when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty.
You dismiss the profound migration and subsequent isolation of dingoes as just dogs are dogs? How perceptive of you.....
“Dogs are dogs”… Brilliant deduction good sir.
Did these paleontologist experts forget most dinosaurs were not very big? 😅
"Did these paleontologist experts forget most dinosaurs were not very big?" Kid, none of these folks are paleontologists. You might want to consult actual scientists before belittling education well beyond your feeble comprension.
NO...I think they know their field....
*** IT ALL DEPENDS WHAT VERY BIG OR NOT MEANS TO YOU. JUST GO TO A MUSEU AND SEE THE SIZE OF ONE THEN MAKE UP YOUR MIND.***
@@frosted1030 consult to paleontologist? like if that is easy to find 🤣
@@oscaralegre3683 "consult to paleontologist? like if that is easy to find" Easier to find than your imaginary friend, you might want to stop playing games.
As soon as I see the word "evolutionist", I know I'm in for some silly Creationist nonsense. I wasn't disappointed! Noah's flood? 😂😂😂
Focused intent will help.keep going.
I was not expecting abortion to be discussed in this because I thought this was going to be about dinos and evolution.
AIG will always find a way to shoehorn in their buzzwords.
It's about Christian apologetics. It has nothing to do with science.
@@jockyoung4491 Yes it seems this way from this video. But also evolution is doing the same thing. They are not being scientific but religious.
@@Jules-740
Scientists arebeing scientific; AIG is not
@@jockyoung4491 Correction, they USED TO be scientific. Now they are being religious and dogmatic.
Ego can make you believe anything.think,seek .quit with external sources so much
Thank you AiG; nice job!
Yep, AIG is creating more and more atheists by spreading lies.
Of what....sounding ridiculous....and not even very funny?
@@bighairyviking387
In 1910 Ivan Panin, a Russian/ American Harvard math genius and linguistic expert, proved the Bible mathematically. Watch - Math proves the Bible. Most recently a 30 year veteran cold case criminologist J. Warner Wallace proved the Bible forensically in his book, Person of Interest. His testimony would convince any jury of the veracity of the Bible. Some of the amazing things in the Bible include the prophecy of the fall of Tyre and the prophecy of Alexander the great. Bible firsts include knowing life being in the blood long before modern science, or the Bible knowing about mountains and currents in the oceans or how the earth hangs on nothing. You should know about the prophecies fulfilled by Jesus and the impossible odds of that happening. The Bible is a reliable collection of historical documents written down by eye witnesses during the lifetime of other eye witnesses. They report to us supernatural events that took place in fulfillment of specific prophecies and claim that the writings are divine rather than human in origin. The Bible has also been proven archaeologically, historically and linguistically.
2 Peter 1:16 For we have not followed cunningly devised fables, when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty.
Start with asking yourself what is really true? Go from there.
Start with the evidence. Go from there.
@@jockyoung4491 Evidence and facts led me to being a devout Christian in my adult life,
@@DemocratPartyOfGaslightingcan I ask what evidence that was?
@@Johnny_Eh-theist You didn't watch the video clearly. You came to the video, paused it immediately before it began, and went straight to the comments.
@@DemocratPartyOfGaslightingI watched the dumpster fire of ipse dixit fallacies, strawman, straight up lies and pooh pooh fallacies, but I asked you about your specific evidence that made you a Christian. Completely separate from the show
The sarcasm is uncalled for.
For the record, “Nuh uh” is not debunking anything
Take your own advice, buddy.
Well then it's a good thing that wasn't the response here. You should try listening.
@@mattrondeau7466 lol I do. When I try to debunk something, I offer evidence.
@@fatalisticsandwich7789 Yeah, sounds like it. You basically ignore the evidence presented and just do the very thing you're claiming creationists do. "Nuh-uh." The irony is 🤌.
@@mattrondeau7466 lol what are you even talking about? What evidence have I ignored? You might be projecting here. I could always be wrong, I’m certainly not perfect, but I don’t remember any evidence being presented in this video. It is just dueling narratives
I'm always been speculation about dinosaurs that exist.
Tastes like chicken? Why did the dinosaur cross the road?
To avoid the street preacher?
@@kevinkelly2162 it's not like the street preacher was gonna rob them
Please slow down. Many of you, including Ken Ham, talk way to fast for me to follow. Just slow down so I can follow along please.
Why does Patricia Engler have a halo?
Carnel or spiritual ...
@@aalphaandomega3746 I think it is spelled carnal
@daviddavenport9350
Thank you, David. You are correct
Oh that's her glasses
Amen AIG 🙂🙏✝️🕊️ thank you for what you do
How did dinosaurs go extinct? Uh, they all died?
I think the caveman discovered fire. Which put too much c02 in the air and since they were tall they all suffocated.
***put your question on the google***
I think grapes were here with dinosaurs and they, get this crazy theory, ate the grapes!
Before grapes were cultivated and selectively bred by humans, they were barely edible.
that's not a speculation.. That's fiction.. something that no one ever witnessed it or observed.. That's just pure out of imagination.. Fiction.. Even common people could do that,..what scientist! 😂😂
What is?
It is called extrapolation from discovered evidence dem.......calls for lots of sophisticated study and research......not merely bible thumping.
Only Jesus saves
Acts 4:12
Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to mankind by which we must be saved.”
Jesus is the only way to salvation and eternal life
John 14:6
Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.
To follow Jesus means leaving everything behind
Matthew 8:18-22
When Jesus saw the crowd around him, he gave orders to cross to the other side of the lake.
19 Then a teacher of the law came to him and said, “Teacher, I will follow you wherever you go.”
20 Jesus replied, “Foxes have dens and birds have nests, but the Son of Man has no place to lay his head.”
21 Another disciple said to him, “Lord, first let me go and bury my father.”
22 But Jesus told him, “Follow me, and let the dead bury their own dead.”
LOL Saves what, and why would you give yourself to a monster? You fear what you don't know, and you support what you beLIEve with logical fallacies.
I legit lost brain cells watching this🤦🏾♀️
Since something didn’t evolve means nothing evolved?
BTW. How many assumptions do you need to make to make Noah’s story work?
***JUST ENJOY THE STORY***
Assisted suicide profoundly changes the doctor patient relationship.
I just heard an "Antputation"
I don’t understand AKA fairytale. 😂
***most of the comments below are pure ignorance, in first place ignorance about the bible and God, then ignorance about everything about life and believing; but the worst is, the followers are fooled, and the leaders gain with it, leaders and followers know all about it and let themselves go on it, otherwise they will feel lost and in their ignorance can not find any log to survive, but if you study GOD by yourself without any bias you will find the true salvation. ***
So aboot Kanada? true doe
I love the way religious people deride the evolutionarily "fairytale" and then talk about an unprovable sky fairy.
Where's your evidence for god?
And please dont say his word is the bible. Who wrote the bible?
Cristians are masters of circular reasoning.
In 1910 Ivan Panin, a Russian/ American Harvard math genius and linguistic expert (and ex-atheist) proved the Bible mathematically. Watch - Math proves the Bible. Most recently a 30 year veteran cold case criminologist J. Warner Wallace proved the Bible forensically in his book, Person of Interest. His testimony would convince any jury of the veracity of the Bible. Some of the amazing things in the Bible include the prophecy of the fall of Tyre and the prophecy of Alexander the great. Bible firsts include knowing life being in the blood long before modern science, or the Bible knowing about mountains and currents in the oceans or how the earth hangs on nothing. You should know about the prophecies fulfilled by Jesus and the impossible odds of that happening. The Bible is a reliable collection of historical documents written down by eye witnesses during the lifetime of other eye witnesses. They report to us supernatural events that took place in fulfillment of specific prophecies and claim that the writings are divine rather than human in origin. The Bible has also been proven archaeologically, historically and linguistically.
2 Peter 1:16 For we have not followed cunningly devised fables, when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty.
With all do respect, the Bible stories happened about 4000 years ago... dinosaurs didn't get extinct when Noah was hanging around, but millions of years ago...
So how does the fact Noah had grapes has any connection to this theory???
Noah was never around, it;s all made up.
*Due respect any DR should know that.
THE ANTS ARE DOING SURGERY!!! 🐜🔪
HAS ANYONE SEEN PHASE 4?!?! 😬
How did these people know about the dinosaurs, from the Bible? They are not there in the Bible, even Noah didn't have them in his cargo list. A chapter should be added to the Bible - Adam, Eve and the dinosaurs.
@@Ming-qm3pv look up the behemoth, it’s a dinosaur described in the Bible
@@teresaberry7287behemoth in no way shape or form describes a dinosaur. What part of those verses make you go, "yep that's a dinosaur"?
@@Johnny_Eh-theist think about it, it’s tail is like a cedar tree. That’s a pretty big, thick tail. Ya kinda need to translate it from the biblical language
@@teresaberry7287 have a look at the Lebanese cedar......remember the part of the world the book was written.
@@Johnny_Eh-theist ok your right, their not very big but neither were the dinosaurs. People think all dinosaurs were so much bigger but they were not, but they were a bit bigger and definitely stronger than some of the other animals. I think talking about all this is awesome. We can learn together. I’m willing to admit I could be wrong. After all I wasn’t there at the time but definitely thank you for talking to me about it. This is cool of you, very cool thanks
Where was the dad?
Considering modern women, she might not even know his last name.
It's funny to me how feminism has trained society to find some way to absolve, or at least lessen, the accountability of women. Not one of her excuses would have even been considered had a man done this, and the mother doing it to her own child is the greater betrayal. Nor would the man have been given such a lenient sentence, and you know she'll get out early on parole.
If dinosaurs lived 65/66 million years ago, some questions:
This is your worldview:
1) Dinosaurs lived 65 million years ago, man didn't exist with them, and some catastrophic event occurred (asteroid/change in atmospheric conditions/a n other - take your pick), and wiped all the dinosaurs out.
If this is the case, how did all the other mammals survive? Why could they live with the dinosaurs, then the "event" occurred, and the smaller animals survived in the new atmosphere? And, I'm guessing, your primate was one of the surviving animals, which then evolved into man?
Or
2) Dinosaurs lived 65 million years ago WITH man. Then the "event" happened. How did mankind survive, and the dinosaurs didn't?
Or
3) Dinosaurs lived on earth, something happened to wipe them out, every animal died, then life began again, and your "miracle" bacteria starting producing life again. This begs the question - why? And also how did the dinosaurs' life begin, before the event which wiped them out? Did this miracle bacteria make the dinosaurs, they got wiped out, then the miracle bacteria started to make life again, following the death of the dinosaurs?
The "event" points to a flood. Dinosaurs are buried in sedimentary rock, often in the death pose, with their heads twisted backwards, gasping for their last breath. If these huge creatures drowned, how did man survive?
Next, the word "pre historic." Prehistoric simply means "before historical records." Historians refer to ancient Mesopotamia as the cradle of civilisation - it's where all the ancient writings are found, and these date back circa 4000 - 5000 years old This area is also referred to the fertile crescent, in, and around the Nile, and Egypt.
If, by accepting one of the 3 points above, why did the dinosaurs die out, man suddenly become clever in one area on earth, and was able to communicate his ideas in writings etc?
Where did Egypt come from, and why is it called Egypt? Where do the Canaanites come from, and why are they referenced as such?
And why did the "evolving man" shed all his fur, then got cold, and decided he needed fur to keep warm? How did man discover fire, and why, as an evolved primate, was he not scared of it, as are every other animals on earth?
Lastly, if the dinosaurs were wiped out millions of years ago, and man is relatively young (as in your worldview, man evolved over millions/hundreds of thousands of years) where are all the skeletons for each step of the evolutionary process, and how old is mankind?
Mammals certainly co-existed with dinosaurs. How did they survive? Because the mammals were all small, could generate their own body heat, many were scavengers and insect eaters, and many lived in underground burrows. These were advantages in the period after the asteroid impact: burrows provided protection, and mammals can survive sudden cold, giant reptiles who needed a constant supply of vast quantities of food could not. There was plenty of carrion and insects. Lots of mammals died out too. And species more acient than dinosaurs survived - corcodilians for example: their slow metablism, sheltering in water etc enabled them to live through it.
Gumans did not live alongside the dinosaurs We're veyr much later than them (though, technically, birds are dinosaurs, of a sort). Humans adapted to live on plains, and to be persistence hunter tool users. A human can outrun almost any animal over long periods. We can sweat over out entire skins, and have virtually no fur, so we los eheat very efficiently. We do not run quickly, but can maintain it for days (some African tribes still do this). Humans invented clothes so they could migrate to cold areas their natural bodies are unsuited to. Humans are instinctively afraid of fire, but we use our intelligence to overcome that fear.
Dead dinosaurs have arched necks and backs because of contracture of the back muscles and spine post mortem. This effect is seen n modern dead aniamls too.
Basically all species which massed over 100kg went extinct. Smaller animals including birds, mammals, reptiles, insects, etc. survived because they could live by scavenging until the ecosystems recovered.
@@richardgregory3684 But your answer makes no sense.
It is full of holes and you haven't addressed key points.
"the mammals were all small, could generate their own body heat, many were scavengers and insect eaters, and many lived in underground burrows. These were advantages in the period after the asteroid impact: burrows provided protection, and mammals can survive sudden cold, giant reptiles who needed a constant supply of vast quantities of food could not. "
Straight away, this sentence alone contradicts the *official* narrative.
According to the American Museum of Natural History, "To explain what caused this mass extinction, scientists have focused on events that would have altered our planet's climate in dramatic, powerful ways. The leading theory is that a huge asteroid or comet slammed into Earth 65 million years ago, blocking sunlight, changing the climate and setting off global wildfires."
So the sun was blocked (cold atmosphere), but fires persisted (heat???). Fires burn things. How come the dinosaur skeletons aren't destroyed, and what exactly buried them? If you die where you die, earth doesn't suddenly bury you. Your "scavengers" would consume your carcass, and the bones themselves.
Hmmm
@@marcj3682 (facepalm) Dinosaurs were living, dying, being buried and being fossilized for over 180 million years before the Chicxulub impact caused extinction.
@@marcj3682 _So the sun was blocked (cold atmosphere), but fires persisted (heat???). Fires burn things_
How long do you think the fires would have burnt? Sheesh, a forest burns for a few hours or days - the blockage on sunlight woul dhave persistem for months, or even years. And a forest fire wouldn;t be enugh to heat the whole world, just locally. More, the smoke and particulates would have blocked even more sunlight, intensifying and prolonging the cold. That;s a major factor in the nuclear winter scenarios. And of course, if the vegetation burned, the plant-eaters would have died out. And then the carnovires that ate the plant eaters.
_How come the dinosaur skeletons aren't destroyed, and what exactly buried them_
You know that dinosaurs existed for many millions of years, right? They were around long, long before they died out. Most of the dinosaurs fossils we unearth today did NOT die in that event. but long before it. And no, most scavengers do NOT eat bones. They pick the flesh off them. Tere are few anials today that specifically eat bone; it is unsually only eaten incidentally (by predators that eat their prey whole, or or large pieces) or eaten only in very small amounts, many aniamls will eat or chew on small amounts of bone for the minerals.
Dont be impressed with precise technical terminology....is that what you just said?
If you are using the BIBLE as a Geology text than your credibility virtually nil!
Amen AIG 🙏
Believe me when I tell you that the grapes of the late Cretaceous were much different than the grapes of today (especially since mankind has tinkered with grape genes).....you people are so hiarious.
Thank you AIG for creating more and more atheists. Your wacky take on science is not only ridiculous but also entertaining. Great work.
😢
You know, people would respect creationists waaaaaaaaaay more of they just stopped peddling ljes and started being honest about their beliefs.
The age of the earth is not something forced on scientists because of evolution. Long before Darwin, geologists had estimated an age of the earth in millions of years. As geology has advanced, the estimated age of the earth hasn't gotten younger, it has gotten older. So you can't just deny biology, you also have to deny physics, geology, chemistry, cosmology, and all the related sciences. The problem for you is that those sciences have been so successful in helping us understand the earth, and the universe we live in. For good or for bad, nothing of the modern world would exist if those sciences were wrong.
Catastrophic geology used to be fringe, and uniformitarianism reigned but now it is the scientific norm.
@@earth9531
There were both catastrophic and gradual events in geological history. No geologist would say otherwise
Some people will come to God this time on earth. Most will come to him after the millennial reign. They will never accept Him before. Jesus says this few find the gate on the narrow path. And many call me Lord in vain. And no matter what evidence you give them they will not accept it.
@@ianmonk6211 You are certainly entitled to believe what you believe, My argument isn't against " believers", it is against believers who either deny science, or present their beliefs as supported by science.
@@earth9531 Which doesn't really affect the age of the earth. And, in fact, uniformitarianism was abandoned long ago. The movement of the earth's crust is reasonable well known nowadays, and informs us as to the history of the earth.
As a Christian, I would like to offer piece of advice: You will not stop abortions or help those young lost souls by spewing judgement from your pseudo-scientific podium. Give Ceasar that which belongs to him, and give to God what is Godly. True followers of Christ do not judge their sisters and brethren, neither do they promote hate of those who aren’t believers. Do not tarnish God’s work by mixing your own agenda with the Scripture. True Christians are stewards for the lost, shelter for the downtrodden, source of strength and hope for the weak. Instead of this lecturing, show people mercy, stretch out your hand, and refrain from unjust judgement. Who are you to cast your stones?!
Ce conte de fée évolutionnistes a la dent dure mais la vérité de Dieu s imposera d elle même 🔥💜🔥alléluia.paix en christ
L'évolution est soutenu par d'innombrables preuves, bien fondés. C'est la bible qui est rempli de contes de fées.
@@bighairyviking387 l évolutionnistmest un mensonge,cela n a jamais été observé c est juste une opinion que les scientistes évolutionnistes ont modélisés pareils pour le big-bang et pour l âge de l univers,ils ne supporte pas l idée d un Dieu créateur tout puissant c est pour cela qu ils ce perdent dans des théories fumeuse et tordus c est une non science
@@christophesutter1844 «ils ne supporte pas l idée d un Dieu créateur »
wich one, easter bunny?
stop liyng and try learn something instead spreading lies about evolution. try read biology 101
@@luish1498 tes manuels sur l évolution sont juste bon à en faire un feu de joie ou à caler un meuble .Évolution 😂😂😂
@@christophesutter1844 burning books? that reminds something!
get educated ok kiddo?
It’s not rooted in evolutionary carbon dating points to that length of time
Have you ever looked into the circular reasoning of "carbon dating"? I know I was quite shocked at the blatant idiocy of it all lol
@@chilltarts Please explain how radiocaron dating works in your own words. Please include your explanation of how radiocarbon is calibrated by over a dozen non-radiometric dating proxies back to 55,000 YBP.
@@chilltarts If you used Carbon-14 to date rocks in the Grand Canyon (millions of years old), it would give you inaccurate findings. Uranium-Lead would be needed in this example.
@@chilltarts no I had not
but the ideas that they start with evolution and then say the world is old is flat out wrong
Even if you disagree with their methods for determining
They do use carbon dating and isotopes dating and rock sediment layers and a combination of those things tells them how old roughly the earth or in this case grape seeds are
You can disagree with the claim based on the evidence and the method achieved
But you can’t say they are doing it because they believe in evolution when they are saying it’s cause of carbon dating ect
@@carpetsnake83 The old age of the Earth was scientifically established well before Darwin published OOS.
AIG is lying to you
You are irrati0nal.
Psalms 14:1 NKJV
[1] The fool has said in his heart, “There is no God.” They are corrupt, They have done abominable works, There is none who does good.
@@UUu-xl3gk AIG is lying to you
@@absquereligione5409 stop lying.
@@UUu-xl3gk AIG is lying to you.
comment 666!
How are they not banned on youtube.
What are they saying that's untrue? Do you always seek to ban what you can not refute?
Once they open their mouths, that's the point you can start to refute what they say.
@@chilltarts So they never went into dinos, and their news is just exploitation and anti constitutional dogma
@@Johnny_Eh-theist They did, so time to get them banned
@@user-ho1tf4rp8ftraitor
Evolution and creationism.what ? No other ways of seeing things? Also,it just got to be that there is a personal person god? No other perceptions at all?. Think,seek.
There are other ways but they are either not plausible, not probable, or neither.
The smirking creatonists
Making fun of things they don't understand is a mechanism to hide their fear.
@@sciencerules2825 "Making fun of things they don't understand" You just described Atheists quite well.
@@DemocratPartyOfGaslightingcare to elaborate on this? Quite the assertion. It seems the athiest community in this comment section has far more to say then the YEC
@@Johnny_Eh-theist You should actually play the video in it's entirety and listen as you watch.
When attempting to critique a theory of the nature world it would behoove you to not insist on appealing to a super natural being... 😅
The pretentious tone carried out in these videos is not something shared in the explanation of natural causes by the scientific community in regard to your theist perspective.
To these creationists childish mockery of science = rebuttal.
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth... Gen1. God said that. I think that qualifies Him to be part of the discussion. Science can't define anything past a guess. It's highest reference is probably. Science makes for a poor god.
@@cvanhaelst4189 I see you don't understand science or religion.
If you want pretentious and arrogant, listen to Matt Dillahunty or Richard Dawkins. Great sources of both.
@@sciencerules2825 To these Atheists, successful refutation of falsehoods = childish mockery
You have people who believe the earth is about 6 thousand, then some say billions. Who is right? The earth is billions of years old, not thousands. The Bible tells us this if you take it back to its original meaning. We have problems understanding the Word. Just pray for knowledge so you won't misslead others. For that is a sin also.
Where did you see that in the Bible? Any references?
I dont see the Bible telling us it's billions of yo. In fact, the words "day and night" is very conclusive of 24 hour days.
@@potatosoup8019 Pretty sure comes from the idea that Ancient Isrealites had different cultures than what we have now, and when I saw culture I mean like overall culture and not 'group' culture. Take the "ill be there in 5 mins" as an example. Its part of culture of our time, which basically means "ill be there shortly". I personally believe it, which makes a lot more sense.
The earth is 6000 years old, Evolutionists create a fictional timeline of billions of years based on the fossils and rock layers laid down by Noahs flood
@@jaysons6101can you elaborate, i dont entirely know how that applies here
Oh yeah! I think if you don’t want kids, don’t mess around 😊