Have You Heard Sheep Gut Strings On A Guitar?
Vložit
- čas přidán 15. 08. 2024
- In this video, I go deeper into the historical methods of playing the guitar by putting historical strings made of sheep gut on my classical guitar. The video includes my reaction to gut strings on classical guitar and sound comparisons of pieces with synthetic strings and gut strings.
Timestamps:
0:00 Introduction
1:01 History of gut strings
2:09 Changing strings
2:35 Open string comparison
2:53 Capricho Arabe
4:33 Adelita
6:38 Variations on a theme by Mozart
8:27 La Catedral (Prelude)
9:30 My take-aways
#classicalguitar #strings
➢🎸MY ONLINE GUITAR COURSE: ClassicalGuita...
➢🎼GUITAR LESSONS: arpeggiato.com/
➢SUPPORT MY CHANNEL: / brandonacker
➢SUBSCRIBE: www.youtube.co...
➢MY CDs: arpeggiato.com...
➢MY ARRANGEMENTS: arpeggiato.com...
➢INSTAGRAM: / brandon.acker.guitar
➢WEBSITE: brandonackergui...
➢MY GEAR: a.co/7d4mo0j
➢CONTACT ME: BrandonAckerGuitar@gmail.com
A huge thank you to my patrons on Patreon who keep this channel alive!
"Producer:"
-Sally Zimmerman
"#1 Fans: "
-Javier Artiles
-Musical Crusader
"Super-Patrons:"
-Håvard E Danielsen
-Tianhong Zhou
-Lyn Dawson
-Tony Dawson
-Mark B Garnick
-Christian Hirschmueller
-Matt Hefko
#classicalguitar #gutstrings - Hudba
Join my online guitar course!🎸classicalguitar-pro.com
-53 videos
-6 hours of content
-Learn your first pieces
-Simulated recital
-Downloads and PDFs
Heh. I broke my first set of gut strings because my guitar nut was too sharp.
And now I'm making a lyre with the leftovers! Ha.
A
6:34
My highly scientific assessment of the difference is that the gut sounds less "splanky".
Lol. Id say it had a warmer tone to it but less splanky works too.
Rounder
To me the gut sounds like light tube saturation :-)
«Σπλάχνα» is a Greek term that means gut. I can’t agree that gut sounds less “splanky”.
It’s like saying I don’t hear that annoying “omentum” sound from the drum now that we remade the drumhead out of that bit of the peritoneum pulled off the stomach.
@@polyhistorphilomath You must be really smart!
0:19 “I’m really committed to the idea of playing with flesh” lol
😏
🤦🏼♀️😂
Lmfao Armie Hammer has entered the chat. 😂
😶
Vamping bro
Was just talking to my mom about my Dad's guitar playing and learned that he used to have a classical guitar with gut strings.
Nice
We don’t care though
@@gustavopaulette3496 rude af
Those sounded amazing. Thank you so much for sharing this with all of us.
Who is that masked Quarantineage....
Bandrew !!
Greetings earthling ;-) Love your channel!
The Pod has spoken. N'uff said. Peace out.
6:52 this comparison convinced me, the gut strings sounded much more like a connected voice, in direct comparison the synthetic strings sound like one tone after the other, really fast.
Agreed! I think this was the best example shown
Too bad it's too expensive for my broke ass
It took alot of guts to play the guitar back in the day.
Omg so funny XDDDD
i love you!
Good one Den ;)
Futhark fan? Dennis trowato?
Kind of like today's Lia Thomas where it takes a lot of balls to compete in the women's team!
Brandon, kudos again for taking the no-nails and gut strings approach seriously. I take issue with only one thing, maybe two things :-) The first is the cost. I’ve had my Aquila 900 gut strings on for over a year, play them every single day, and have tuned them to various pitches. They are very stable strings, based on Pujol’s measurements. The other thing is that nail players can use varnished gut strings without the problems you mention. Keep up the good work!
Good to hear from you, Rob!
I really appreciate your feedback since I'm so envious of your no-nail tone. I'm surprised you've found them to be stable. I've had gut on my theorbo for a year and in recording sessions/concerts I have to retune between every take. I am using varnished gut by Kürschner but my nails actually still chewed through the trebles. But you're right that I had no problem using nails with the gut other than that. I loved the sound.
I hope you're well!
Brandon
Hi Rob, love your videos, really amazing tone. Just wondering, what do you think of the Aquila vs Damian Dlugolecki, if you've used them? My teacher uses La Bella, but since those are no longer available, he suggested I try Damian's if I wanted to give gut a try again. I don't think he's tried Aquila.
@@sharonvizcaino1442 Sharon, my thoughts on strings (and many other things) are on my website: rmclassicalguitar.com/strings/
Cheers, Rob.
@Bran Hi Bran.
@@RobMacKillop1
Every time I click on one of Brandon’s videos I’m just blown away by how incredible of a guitarist he is
IMO I think he is a master of the guitar.
Just because you grew a beard, doesn't mean I'm not onto you, vampire.
Probably just a stick-on beard from the dollar store
Every video is an interview with a vampire
He is trying to pretend that he ages :p
I don't get the vampire joke.
@@topneorej it ain't a joke- it's a fact
This and your no-nails video were extremely well done, and informative. You're a terrific presenter, and of course a superb musician. Thank you for sharing these with us.
I’m a machinist by trade, and I tinker with classical guitar playing in my free time.
Due to my line of work, I find it impossible to keep my fingernails from constantly breaking, so I’m kinda stuck with the flesh technique.
It makes sense to me that early guitar players would play with flesh as well, as life for many people back then was subject to more toil and laborious tasks, that might not have allowed for long fingernails.
I loved the gut string comparison. Thank you for sharing. :)
Try press-on nails
Nails are disgusting 😅😂
They actually did not use nails back in the day, Segovia actually misinterpreted that meaning which caused him to use nails exclusively. Later in life he switched to a more "fleshy" approach as well.
I don't have the guts to play an expensive guitar
Hehe...
Bruh
What about a cheap one?
Me neither. I usually smash mine after each performance like Townsend
Maybe the neighbors have a few sheeps in the front yard. If necessary, an old cat can also be used as an organ donor. ◐.̃◐👆
0:08 "with nails, on their fucking hand" lol
Hahaha I thought I was the only one who heard it
Very inconsiderate what you think about it... your fucking hand should always be well manicured.
@@malevolentsloth I thought he said that as well. I had to rewind a couple times; he is saying "plucking", lol!
@@tenhundredkills you're mistaken. he said "fucking hands"
@@tenhundredkills i´ll definetely go with "fucking"
It feels to me like the biggest difference is on the attack, the gut feels like the attack is more gentle, rising to peak volume, whereas the nylgut is a very sharp and sudden attack. On top of the warmer sound of the gut, the effect is to really mellow the instrument.
As far as sustain goes, I had the great pleasure of noodling on a gut strung bray harp at Ardival in Scotland, having dabbled a little on wire harp. I was expecting the difference in sustain between gut and wire to be huge, but it was much more subtle than I expected.
I've been listening to (and dabbling at) classical guitar for years, but I can hardly hear a difference. Thanks for your comment
@@bens5507 I'm a fiddler (also playing early Scottish music on a gut-strung baroque violin) who dabbles in bagpipes, so I'm probably listening for different aspects of the sound.
Though the fact that I can hear anything at all is a miracle, thanks to those bagpipes!
i have to agree, gut sounds smoother, warmer and more round, but you explained it more concisely and precisely than i could lol
As someone who dabbles daily with synthesizers, this is also what i heard. The gut string sounds punchier and more responsive, as if it had a faster attack than the synthetic ones
Beautiful! But not sure I want to know who in history sat around and discovered guts made pretty noises 😳😂
😂 probably a hermit that lived deep in a forest
Ancient Greeks I believe.
😂😂
Ancient Egypt, catgut was found in many instruments
Guts were used for a lot of things! Sausage casings, for one. Just imagine, you live in really ancient times where it's best to use as much of an animal as you can. You're most likely going to discover the uses of each part of the animal, because it's kind of necessary.
This could just be confirmation bias, but to me, the gut strings seem to have a cleaner harmonic profile. It feels like the fundamental is much stronger, and the higher partials of the strings are more pleasing to the ear.
I think you're right, back to back, the nylon strings sound almost like my ears were blocked when compared to the gut strings. The sustain has a very different quality to it as well, although I can't quite place it. It's almost like there's more reverb with the gut strings.
I agree. Stronger fundamental. More higher overtones and stronger note separation. And more sustain.
Edit: more pure overtones really, but I do hear higher ones more clearly with less of that metallic bite from the more dissonant ones.
@@nfectedpsychosis I was surprised by the top-end "zing" ("sparkle?") that the gut strings produced. It's almost like the gut strings brought back a bit of the sharpness of playing with nails. I suspect it has to do with the surface friction allowing for a stronger pluck when playing sans nails.
to my admittedly untrained ear the gut strings definitely have a richer and more full tone that rounds off more smoothly and the synthetic ones come across as more sharp/bright and flatter.
Lotta words to just say it sounds "warmer" lol
The sound of the gut strings sound so full. The bass is well balanced and the harmonics are so clear, and yet so warm sounding
wow, I never would have guessed that there would be such a substantial difference in tone between real and synthetic gut strings. just gorgeous .
It is not the string. It is you who make this instrument cry. Thanks for all the good music and kind personality.
I’m making a six course gut fretted guitar right now eg pagés, and listening to this just on my crappy iphone se speakers, every time the gut strings start, my eyebrows go up and my head goes back. it’s such a clearer sound. somehow brighter AND less harsh.
I just want to say thank you, you're a huge inspiration. I recently took an interest in classical music and after watching some of your videos I purchased my first classical guitar, so thank you that.
Thanks for your no nails experiment. Being a piano player I'd always shied away from guitar because I didn't want to grow out a set of claws.
At least now I know you can be proficient without them and I've decided to take up fingerstyle guitar.
You don't want to grow nails, but you're a gryphon!
Ever heard of tommy emanuel? He also doesnt use fingernails
That’s freaking awesome dude
@@woomi177 he plays only steel string though. pretty different
@@Goriaas i was just pointing it out since he mentioned fingerstyle.
Gut strings. Hands down.. once again Mr Acker, you never fail to go above and beyond. Soooooooooooooooooooo many people on the platform are just rife with misinformation. You sir, are always such a refreshing and informative creator.
ohhh my god... i´m from Paraguay, Pío Barrios country i´ve heard a lot of musicians trying to interpretate that masterpiece and they did it in a certain way... even the most famous guitarrist player from Paraguay Berta Rojas played that song but...... you my man... you took it to the next level i can feel Pío Barrios soul when you are playing it my gosh that was another level of music... THANK YOU for this and i really mean it thank you for this!!!! please do a full cover fo that song
Thanks for making this; I saw in my analytics that this video was the highest click-through traffic source for my own Aquila gut strings review (and I even see my thumbnail over on the side, woah! 🤯) so I had to come check it out. I also appreciate you helping to bring gut strings from the periphery of the period instrument movement to the mainstream 👏. I certainly agree that the gut is easier to play; moreover, since it's a natural material, the tone has a more organic quality. I'm trying Pyramid gut next, and will look into the Boston Catlines for next time. Admittedly, I've seen your videos come up in recommended before, but this is the first one I've watched. I generally avoid large channels because I find them impersonal, but have now unreservedly subscribed. 😎
Hi Brandon i love listening your covers/songs. Even though i have a cheap classical guitar, you inspire me to become better! You are such an amazing guy and player ! Thanks
We all start somewhere
@@user-83hricueb7 Absolutely
The difference in color between gut and synthetic strings is really amazing! I am so glad I discovered your channel a couple weeks ago. Thanks for sharing your knowledge and music!
Years ago I played on gut strings for a while. I like the sound the touch, and the response. Also, I find that gut strings feel live, and not surprising, organic under the fingers. But, as you say, for even a very-little-nail player such as myself, they wear more quickly. And they are very expensive. Ironically, Aquila Alabastro strings are the closest to a gut in sound and feel (liveliness) that I have encountered. I use them exclusively on my personal guitar. (I have not yet used the other Aquila strings that they market as being even closer to gut sound and feel.) Thank you for this discussion. Play on!
Scott - thanks for the reference. I will try a set. Word of mouth is the best advertisement.
I swear by Aquila strings. I usually get alabastro but I have tried a few of their string sets. I refuse to purchase any other brand of strings
Why does the audio on this video sound so much better?
Your voice always sounds great but somehow it sounds even better in this one.
I've learned so much about the history of stringed/fretted instruments by just watching two of your videos. I was so excited I ran and told my girlfriend about all these cool facts I just learned. I don't think she was as excited as I was, but thank you so much for your videos nonetheless :)
Oh, that was wonderful hearing the comparison. To my ear the gut strings are much more preferable, by far. The sound was noticeably refined with a sweet singing quality that sounded like it had a genuine life inside of it. I don't know how to describe the effect accurately but it was kind of like opening the door to a whole other universe of music and I didn't want to leave. I've never heard such a mesmerizing soundscape. Now, I'm really excited about hearing more from the gut strings. In every comparison the sound was more rounded and the decay sounded natural and felt familiar. Thank you so much.
The gut strings sounded so lovely. So soft and elusive, I was amazed at how different they sounded.
i've been waiting for so long for your Video. And suddenly you came with the answer for what i asked.. Thankyou So much.
God Bless you
You and your stupid great playing. On the first piece I had to rewind 4 times because I kept getting lost in the music and forgetting to listen to the strings! Lol. That's an awesome super power. And yeah. They sound wonderful. Immediate extra bit of life audible in the instrument with the gut.
Thanks for the video.
Within two videos I’m convinced of several things, no nails (except for effect) gut strings are sublime, and you are totally awesome and an amazing artist
I see you are a man of culture. Other youtubers just cut through their strings.
Gut is worth it whenever you have the chance (They are rather expensive) and you have a proper climate (Rather humid so the strings won't shrink) however since they are rather unstable and more expensive but you want to try the antique / romantic sound, some good sets are rectified nylon in general, such as D'Addario Rectified Nylon, Savarez Traditional Trebles (Rectified, not Crystal) in their respective tensions, Aquila Ambra 800 or 900 (Lower and higher tension respectively) to name the most that come to mind.
All these sets are proper for antique guitar since they have rather dark and balanced basses and textured treble strings, pretty much similar or the closest in synthetic materials to actual gut sets. By the way i am really loving the romantic kind of sound since i also have a Torres replica guitar. Had been putting on Savarez Corum carbons on it and it didn't sang, it screamed... Extremely cutting as a set overall. D'Addario and Knobloch carbons are warmer but still have certain cut to the sound. Some nylons have always been very dark for me, D'Addario nylon overall. My fave sets soundwise were Augustine Regals but they get damaged quite quickly and easily, so i will have to ditch them. And since the rectifieds keep a better character and on top of that, suit the character of the guitar better than carbons, i think i will get several sets of trebles from those brands and pair with some dark high tension basses, to bring a more traditional character to that guitar. Greetings Mr. Acker from Mexico, take care
It sounds to me like the sound of vinyl vs. digital in terms of warmth and clarity. Love it.
really great to see someone so genuinely happy during a review! Glad you loved them. I think I'm going to have to get a set as well!
Brandon, to put it simply, the synthetic strings sounded “synthetic” in comparison to the more “organic” sound, if you will, of the gut strings. The gut strings sounded richer, fuller to my ears. I’m not a classical guitarist but I do play jazz on the guitar. I use Thomastik-Infeld flat wound strings on my arch top guitar, and I stopped using a pick years ago preferring the warmer sound of my fingers on the strings-no nails. I do have a classical guitar that I use for solo gigs-again no nails-and even with my bastardized finger style playing, it just sound better without nails. I will now look into getting gut strings for the classical guitar. Thanks so much. Wish I had the right hand technique you classical guitars have!!
I've always been a hardline flesh player for that exact reason. I love the warmth too much
I love how the most eloquent musician on the internet has a Coca-Cola and Mountain Dew sponsorship. What an absolute inspiration lmao
xd
Mate, the strings are good but I'm much more impressed with your playing technique and feeling! What a way of playing!!! And without nails!! Loved the pieces...
synthetic strings have a metallic ping sound on striking it while the gut string has way less of that. It sounds like the tone just starts. Wonderful demo. Your consistency allowed even me to hear the difference.
Thank you very much! 20 years listening about gut strings, just words about it and the rest left to imagination. A great hug from Brazil!
This is amazing! I didn't even know guts strings were still arround, never thought of this, will definitely give them a try when I get the chance. Great video Brandon! Thanks!
There definitely seems to be a homogeneity of sound from bottom to top with the gut strings, as if in playing chromatically from fourth through third string it would be hard to tell where the string change occurred. Whether this is the case or not the palying is delightful as always.
What I envy you most for is not your gut strings but the incredible effortlessnes and clearness with which you play the high chord with the ornament in Adelita.
Always nice to see a new video pop in when I have a fresh coffee in hand. Good on you! Relaxing and informative 😀
Real test would be the blind test. You should have just put "Strings A" and "Strings B" while you were playing, and then let us decide which ones are gut, and which ones are synthetic. And of course, reveal the result at the end of the video :-)
Personally, I would just have to guess because they sound very very similar to me.
Btw, I'm very glad for that, because I'm using Aguila nylgut for quite some time, and this video just confirms that my decision was a good one.
Thank you for your videos, you are doing great job, and I'm very happy that you've started playing without nails! I'm playing without nails and I've been asking myself so many times if it was possible at all to achieve good tremolo without them. According to that short segment from your last video, it seems that it is! :-)
Come on, I can clearly tell the difference and I'm not that talented (at least for pitch).
Completely got the resonance in the gut strings. It sounds beautiful. I think I'm going to follow suit and get some. My most expensive guitar just doesn't sound amazing. Had it a year, tried multiple strings and just not getting the sound I want. I'm sure it's wanting the gut strings. Loved Adelita. I got really excited when you said you were going to play it. Not heard it since learning it myself and glad to know I got it right. :) thanks as always, great video.
I'm so lost in the pieces and performance that I lose track of listening for the differences! Great job on the videos, I love every single one of them.
Omg finally! A classical guitar with gut strings. On CZcams there're barely any videos about it
wrong, please check out: carles trepat, rob mckillop, tate harmann, steven watson, william wyse, Josh vanjani
I use Aquila strings, of many type, since years and I've never heard something like this. Right now I'm using nylgut strings and... I loved them since the first note, I suppose this will be a returnless trip. 🤩. They even mantein the tuning incredibly..TOP!.
The gut strings sound a bit less percussive to me, which is to say there isn’t that “pop” at the pluck/pick/strike (whatever you want to call it). Other than that, I couldn’t detect a difference worth making the switch. But then again...you mention the feel of the strings. That’s a huge difference.
I’ll confess my classical experience is small. The argument in the “electric world” seems to be about gauges. I played a heavy gauge string for close to 2 decades because of that tone. After listening to gauge comparisons (with my eyes closed for what it’s worth) I found what I was hearing was mostly what I wanted to hear (although not entirely). I also found using a heavy gauge low end and a light gauge high end made my instrument much more enjoyable (comfortable) to play. Bottom line is this: try a lot of different things. Choose the ones you like, and choose them for the reasons that make sense to you.
🙂❤️
I used to play Contrabass in the Symphony down in Texas. One season I out gut strings on my bass because I also had a ton of bluegrass gigs that year. Man, on Arco!!!!! It was amazing.
A really interesting experiment you have provided for us. Thanks
You convinced me after saying gut strings are easier to play! I'm also inclined to try anything that might help me get through Recuerdos 😅 Would love to see a La Catedral cover. It sounds so beautiful with the gut strings.
How tf is this comment 11 hours ago
@@daniberberi7165 Brandon has a Patreon, so I would bet Stephen is a patron and thus got early access.
@@caesar2164 Yes, that is correct
@@caesar2164 what is patreon?
@@caesar2164 ohh thx for explaining
That's a really subtle change in the way those strings sound! Pleasantly surprised by the effectiveness of synthetic strings, you've really got to be paying attention to catch it, y'know? From your explanation of things here, seems like they're more of an effect on how the instrument feels to play rather than overall tone, at least to the average ear.
Listening to you play capricho árabe is always somehow so unbelievably satisfying to me lol, i could listen to it all day.
You earned my subscription with this presentation. Thank you. I love the sound of gut. It's such a warm companion for wood.
The sound difference is on par with a pickup swap on an electric guitar! It really makes the instrument come to life! I'm buying a set of true gut stings now!
Well, I guess you discovered one reason why more people used to play with their flesh: they were also playing gut strings! The historical gut string-flesh combo makes a lot of sense if nails just cut into the gut.
The timbre of the gut strings have so much more character, definitely warmer. It does sound to me (on my phone's speakers) like the sustain curve is a different shape, like there's a steeper decay, even if the overall sustain duration is comprable.
Both SOUNDED amazing ly good.....to my ears,thru my speakers, no dicernible difference. Great vid!
Both types of strings sound super in-tune across the entire fretboard.
The intonation on that thing is sensational! Every classical guitar I've played has had poor intonation - including quite expensive ones [ a lower priced Ramirez for instance].
I thought the gut strings had a subtle and classic styling to them, but the downsides you outlined would put me off trying them.
Fantastic video and so clearly explained. CZcams at its sanest!
I mean with Brandon Acker, he could make plywood sound good.
Django played plywood... don’t knock it!
I like the gut strings. They sound a bit fuller, more warm and rounded, just beautiful.
Wow! I usually don't hear enough of a noticeable difference to my untrained ears in these comparison videos, but those gut strings SANG! 🤩
I love how enthused you are in the video, clearly love what you're doing! Really interesting content.
I can feel my blood pressure 10 points dropping.
Wow... was going to post the same. Every time I watch one of Brandon's vids, I feel my BP dropping into the Zen range. ;-)
Of course we can only hear the recorded sound and it is played without nails, but I definitely prefer the synthetic strings, sorry. Clearer note definition, more brilliance but not too much, better sound projection, a frequency spectrum that I like. Guts string have indeed a specific nice sound texture, but I think that is only enjoyable for someone who is sufficiently close to the instrument. The problem with many guitars is too much midrange frequencies or other kinds of less desirable distributions. You can call this warm, but sometimes muddy is a better word. I also suspect that the combination of gut with brand new metal coated basses could easily create an imbalace.
The sound is crazy!! The clarity and warmth makes it sound like you changed guitars entirely.
This is a complete epiphany moment for me, everything I could feel was wrong or missing with my guitar sound, a niggling dissatisfaction if you will, I think sits right here with gut strings. Thanks for that.
a vampire playing with flesh and guts...
okay enough internet for today.
Great comparison! The gut sounds so warm. Just a natural tone compared to the synthetic, which is more bright but you can just really tell the difference. Really great!
There is a French manufacturer of guitar strings called SAVAREZ, founded in 1770, that manages to give their strings a similar feeling to the fingers, as you explain is the case of gut strings. While they're still synthetic, they are surprisingly not slippery at all, which reflects on the quality of both your playing and the sound.
Hi..Thank you @AnibalPacaco for mentioning Savarez. I've used the rectified Savarez strings for years and compared them directly to Dan Larson gut strings from Gamut Music (USA). The Savarez are virtually indistinguishable from the Larson gut. At the time that the Savarez rectifying process was applied to nylon gut was still the feel and sound of the classical guitar. Savarez used that as the model and applied the rectification process, originally developed for gut, to the nylon to get dependable intonation and tonal quality. According to Savarez these are their best selling strings.
The gut strings are a lot mellower, removing a lot of harsh high end that you get from synthetic. I'm not overly surprised, but very pleased by the tonal color of the gut strings.
-Wrote this before you said tone color. Our brainwaves vibrate at the same frequency. Very cool
the shorter sustain paradoxically makes it sound more romantic. the strings sound more balanced also, especially thr 3rd string
This is awesome Brandon!! I’ve been on the no nail journey and it’s crazy seeing you (one of my favorite guitarists) become such an advocate :)
One thing I’ll say is that if gut is too expensive, the closest alternative I’ve found are “Rectified” nylon strings. Specifically Savarez 520J strings. They are “Rectified” because they’re textured, and give me a lot of grip and control, similar to steel strings. Rob Mackillop also recommends these on his website!
Awesome! The overtones even through the phone, WOW! Like analogue and digital. Must be the secret to why some of the greats today sound even better
Very good comparison and description of the differences between Gut and Synthetic strings. I have played gut strings before, and found them to feel kind of sticky in the humid climate where I live. The do have a better tone - warmer, sweeter, more fundamental frequency, louder, and perhaps even better sustain on the high strings/notes. Constant tuning is an unfortunate necessity. I used to play Savarez "rectified" synthetic strings that have a somewhat rough finish on the treble strings, so they didn't feel so slippery. I'm not so finicky these days. Thanks
WHAT A FREAKING GREAT VIDEO!
Wow, I'm really impressed with the brightness 😲 I'm about to record something I've been working on for the past two years and this really makes me consider trying these 🤔I studied with a student of Segovia who is old enough to have had to use gut strings and he has nothing good to say about them, but it seems they've come a long way.
great video. I was having a gut string moment (happens every few years) and this was great to encourage me to get a new set. Thanks!
Your hammer ons and pull offs are much cleaner and more defined with gut strings. All in all a much nicer sound than the synthetic strings
This feels a lot like the "film has more soul than digital" in the photography world, or "vinyl sounds more organic than digital" in the audio world. I don't know how to reconcile this video with the fact that players that bridged the time between gut and nylon witched to nylon. Is it possible that if you hope that gut will sound better, it will "sound" better? There is a human playing the instrument, so that immediately introduces a variable into the comparison when playing. The subtle differences in how you play based upon your expectations, and emotional feeling towards what you are testing, can introduce variables. And not saying the video is wrong, just interesting debate.
Could be nylon is cheaper. And plus if you tell someone you are playing with guy it seems kind of gross
But analog does sound more organic than digital... it’s because of the even harmonics and because the waves are continuous and uninterrupted. Sure, TODAY’s digital has surpassed analog in clarity and fidelity (go back and check out 80s digital if you want more extreme examples of its problems), but it will never have the same warmth.
I think it's something like the synthetic reed situation on woodwinds. You can make synthetics that give 8.5/10 or maybe even 9/10 performance, straight out of the box, consistently, and hold this state for many hours of playing -- but they're never absolutely perfect. Or you can play on cane, where you get one (two if you're really lucky) reed out of ten that is better than the synthetics, and four or five out of ten don't even play without significant alteration. That one perfect reed _is_ demonstrably better than the synthetics, but you can spend your whole life chasing and cultivating the perfect cane and only get two or three hours out of each one, from the time it is fully broken in to the time it's mush. Also, which of your cultivated perfect reed collection is perfect _today_ will vary by conditions. So a lot of players go for the consistency and time savings (not to mention money savings) and play synthetic reeds because they Just Work.
In my opinion, youd never listen to a guitar recording and automatically say "thats gut!" I just hear a great guitar. On guitar gut seems quicker to react and are brighter but i dont hear twang. On violin and viola, it has a bright twang to it that, for me as a violist, can pick out right away. Theres also a slight whistle as an undertone that gets worse as the string ages and begins to frey. As the string vibrates and the fray cuts the air around it so you have the note plus a whistle and less control. The two instruments are right by your ear so you can hear it after, id say 30ish hours of playing on that set. That of course depends on your sweat and oil because those degrade your strings. People complain about moisture and lack of as well. I live in the desert so they do break easier because you keep your instrument in a more humid room but your rehearsals and performances arent, and they cost alot.
@@miguelmarquez4192 Very interesting and informative. Thank you for the detail.
I had no idea they used the gut for the frets too. I love how you include some interesting history.
Thanks for the comparison, Brandon. Very interesting demo! I've always wondered how gut differed from synthetics. Based on listening to these examples on my computer with earbuds, IMHO, I thought that the synthetics had more sustain and a fuller, brighter, and ringing initial attack--they "popped" a bit more and sustained a bit longer, providing slightly richer overtones throughout.
I do like the high end on the synthetic better but they have a kind of boomy low mid that I’ve never liked on nylon guitars. The gut strings sound great in the mids, they don’t have that sound that I’ve always disliked, but are missing that high end that I like, however if they were played with nails I think that would sound really good. Not sure what to do about the drop in sustain tho. Overall really interesting to hear thanks Brandon
Slightly warmer but not exactly the huge leap I was expecting.
Really? I found it so huge 😅
@@mathdantastav2496 I had a lot of trouble hearing the difference, too. He needs to do a "guess which is which" video so we can see if we really can tell. I did pretty well on metal vs wooden flutes, but exactly backward on metal vs wooden clarinets. I've heard that the difference between gut and nylon is more apparent to the player than anyone more than a few feet away.
Honestly the synthetic sounded warmer, but if I had the option would go for the gut, cause it’s more environmentally friendly and it’s still a beautiful sound
@@tomjohnson2001 It's debatable whether the gut is more environmentally friendly. It's certainly not efficient because so many sheep are needed to make strings a few stings. Of course nylon itself is a pollutant unless we start recycling all of it.
@@LEgregius does it have to be sheep? And all sheep (whatever animal) die eventually, they don’t have to be farmed only for the purpose of gut. Also anything that has been around for centuries I believe to be better for the environment. I really don’t think recycling plastic will ever be a solution to sustainability. Plastic is hardly ever recycled, and the processes to manufacture and repurpose plastic are harmful.
I had a student who did manual labor which prevented him from using nails. I had him try bow rosin on his RH fingertips. This provided the necessary friction (similar to a gut string) on the trebles for a consistent stroke and fuller tone. Cheap way to try this before buying expensive gut strings. It occurs to me what gut strings plus bow rosin would sound like? Perhaps loud like long nails! Informative video, thanks for posting.
Excellent presentation. I am a beginner but have a great 1964 Goya G-10 to learn on. I cannot wait to try Guy strings once I become a bit proficient.
Loving the Infinity War Captain America beard
I see he copied Thor's beard
To me these sound exactly the same because the Original idea of Synthetic Strings was to emulate a Gut String Sound while being sturdier. The KF110 & KR116 Strings have quite a lot of overtones like Gut Strings & sound very akin to them due to their Rope Core.
I did notice a little difference. To me, the gut had a crispier resonance, like they just sounded a little more clear and focused. But it did take me really paying attention to note the difference. Like Brandon said, the gut sounded just a bit warmer. I can get behind staying with synthetic because of price and not having really any impact to the performance.
The treble strings sound very different, not even close. Were you watching it on your phone? Serious question btw.
@@eduardobenassi3072 Nah it's my opinion.
How is it possible i didn't hear that. Are you playing an Instrument?
@@Drawsler It's a Guitar and the ones that were originally strung with Gut strings often noe use Nylon which is sturdier and more affordable.
Gut strings on my harp sound beautiful, yet I never thought of putting them on my guitar. I will next time they need changing. I can't grow nails and always thought I was amis by having them for playing classical style. Your video on that was wonderfully reassuring and appreciated! We have to play on flesh on harp. I remember my harp teacher checking my nails to see if they were short enough. So for a long time I thought I was correct for harp and not for guitar. Now I'm good to go on both, I see. Thanks!
I could probably comment this same thing on your vids forever but:
i couldn't tell the difference. hearing you play it twice was great
i wanted to make a vegan joke but this video is too nice for that
It's nice to see Tobey Maguire broadening his skillset beyond acting
I don't know if I'm imagining it, but I could hear the difference immediately even on my phone. What a nice sound these gut strings have... Wow.
P.S. I am not imagining it, just wow. Love the clarity and breadth of the gut strings.
P.S.S. You describe the same thing as resonance and warmth. Yeah, it is lovely! I think anyone who puts significant money into a classical guitar should use gut strings.
P.S.S.S. When you play synthetic it sounds as if I'm playing in my bedroom (because it sounds like my 50 euro classical guitar). But with the gut strings it sounds like I'm in the Italian countryside.
Wow! huge difference when you played La Catedral, when you started playing with the gut strings, it was almost as if you could hear the life in the strings. so much character