More Funny Clips From Series 12 | Best of Would I Lie to You? | Would I Lie to You? | Banijay Comedy
Vložit
- čas přidán 31. 05. 2024
- More Funny Clips From Series 12 | Best of Would I Lie to You? | Would I Lie to You? | Banijay Comedy
0:00 - Dion Dublin: "I once sneezed so hard in my car I set off the airbag."
4:26 - Paul Sinha: "Every night, to cram in as much learning as possible, I read a book while simultaneously listening to a completely different audiobook."
8:21 - Lee Mack (Possession): "This is my lucky dice. I can always roll a six with it in three goes."
13:51 - Stacey Dooley: "I was once so cold, I shivered my skirt off."
17:25 - Tomasz Schafernaker: "Until my mid-thirties, I had no idea that lambs were in fact baby sheep."
21:58 - Lee Mack: "I once refused to help a hang glider who had become tangled in a tree because two hours earlier, he had been rude to me in a carpark."
Welcome to Banijay Comedy - the home of classic comedy shows!
Settle in for a lot of laughs with all of your comedy favourites. From classic panel shows like Would I Lie to You? and 8 Out of 10 Cats to British sitcoms like Bad Education and Benidorm.
Don’t forget to subscribe so you don’t miss out:
Follow Us On Facebook / allbritcomedy
Formerly known as All Brit.
All content distributed via Banijay Rights & its affiliate production labels
#WILTY #wouldilietoyou #BanijayComedy - Komedie
![[柴犬ASMR]曼玉Manyu&小白Bai 毛发护理Spa asmr](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/0TsXQ7z2Dh4/mqdefault.jpg)
"He's coming at me with facts to confuse me" ahahaha
if only all lies could be detected that way!
I always considered him an odd fellow but from that line I'd bro down with the bro and chug some natty lights bro
I honestly don't think he was joking, that was the funniest part lol
Lee Mack is possibly the quickest comedian ever with his comebacks 🤣🤣🤣
I will never be able to get enough of David Mitchell and Big Narstie, they really are a purely hilarious pair.
Seriously, I would love to watch a buddy flick of them together.
The episode that has him with, "possession", and he does nothing, then they ask why he's not reading his card, and he replies, "it says possession, but, I was young, I was young!" And David creases up. Big Narstie is VERY quick witted.
I love shows that still know that the best humour is, off the cuff..
❤️
Better duo than mo
That whole die and syphilis back and forth always kills me man lol
Rob : With her bare hands?
Lee : No she got human hands
That was instant! Lee is something else 🤣🤣
"where did you get it from?"
"I got it from an old woman in Highgate"
"I meant the syphilis"
"Oh sorry, i paid for it £4.99"
"What about the dice?"
"Full of spots" 😂😂
Brilliant exchange. This is why I love comedy panel shows and especially WILTY.
The Two Ronnies would be proud of that one 🤣😂
What does the “full of spots” bit mean?
@@orianalewis4266 syphilis can cause spots and I'm assuming it's a double meaning innuendo like the rest of the exchange regarding the number of spots on each side of a dice
its edited a bit to be more snappy but still funny
I love how when Lee reads the card about the dice he gives Rob a look of You've got to be kidding!
The way David keeps stuttering when he's trying to sound apologetic when he asks Tomasz what A-levels he took 😂😂 "You ever seen an adult Caterpillar?" 😂
I thought I was a bit thick because each time I hear David explain the tree situation (two thirds, plus a half etc...) my brain just melts and I have no idea! Then I heard, "He's coming at me with facts to confuse me" and a guy that thought a Lamb and Sheep were two completely separate animals!!
And you know I don't feel quite so stupid any more...
He did some pretty quick mental maths, it was quite amazing!
@@Abhinand-10 can someone explain the maths because I still don’t get it😂
@@orianalewis4266 It's less math and more quirks of the English language. When Lee said the height of the tree is 2/3rds (of the total height) plus 1/3rd, the implication is that the third is reffering to the total height of the tree.
What David is doing is taking the other valid interpretation of the statement, which is that '1/3rd' is relative to the partial height of the tree, i.e. the height of the tree was 2/3rds plus 1/3rd (of the 2/3rds).
With this interpretation, the tree's full height would be, as David says, 3/4 + (1/3 of 3/4), or 2/3 + (1/2 of 2/3). Both add up to 1, a.k.a the full height of the tree.
I love how David & Big Nastie were bonding. It was so funny and warm. More please!
"Is that true?"
David: 🤷♂️
Lee is just so quick I love it
I genuinely bought A to Z of Everything because of that clip, so the advertisement worked.
I’m glad I’m not the only one, I did the same thing! It’s an absolute monster of a book and is about as long as ‘War and Peace’. I’ve currently got it stashed under my bed. The irony is I’m still absolutely rubbish at quiz shows haha. What about you?
@@Harvey1211 Oh I’ve never even opened it. I wasn’t exactly sober when I bought it.
@@ericosb4503 hang on, now I’m trying to picture the scene haha. What originally happened when you first saw the package at your door then? How did that play out?
@@Harvey1211 Oh I had an order email in the morning. I knew it was coming.
@@ericosb4503 now I’m investigating you like they do on the show haha. How long have you had it then? Because I think this episode went out in 2018 so you could’ve had it for a while.
When Lee sat down that reset the number of rolls: he rolled two times and then one time, not three times.
For the die, Lee rolled 5, 3, 2 right?
5+3 = 8
8-2 = 6
He got it in my book
Knowing how quick Lee is with numbers from playing darts that I was surprised when he didn’t say this.
I thought it straight away!
Lee was on fire in that last clip
I skip ahead as soon as he opens his mouth. I cannot stand him.
I will never ,ever get fed up with WILT you😂😂
Bear Hands 😂
I've seen this a thousand times and it's never not funny 🤣
In Tomasz’ defense: what about ponies and horses?
I thought ponies were baby horses until I was about 45. I also thought peanuts grew above ground until 2 years ago.
Wow..,that was like a mini vacation...Lotsa fun...and beautiful vistas as always
Totally missed out on 5 + 3 then minus 2 for the dice lie
The first one was a lie because you can only trigger an airbag with a g-force sensor in the front frame. This is the fear people get about airbags, depicted in comedy shows as blowing for little reason.
And the phrase should be "Red sky at night, *sailors* delight, red sky at dawn, sailors be warned". It's an adage warning of impending weather.
You’re wrong about sailors, or at least partially wrong. It may be both but it’s certainly shepherd
@@Abigart69 no, it should be sailors. It's an old mariners rhyme, because the weather is pretty important to sailors, and not so much to Shepards. To be so confidently wrong
@@owenjames8575 actually there is little to no consensus on which saying came first. Both appear to originate from a verse in the Bible, which does not mention sailor or shepherd.
I do however agree with your last comment of, ‘’To be so confidently wrong”
How many oak trees has anyone seen on the top of a cliff? 🤣
I didn’t even know until now that Ronald Reagan beating Walter Mondale was a world record and I lived in the USA in the eighties. Amazing ! It took a British panel show for me to know that!
He got the numbers wrong. Reagan beat Mondale in the popular vote 58.8% to 40.6%, not 70/30. By comparison, in 1972 Nixon beat McGovern 60.7-37.5 and Johnson beat Goldwater 61.1-38.5 in 1964.
I wish I got the regional jokes more. From one of the Guy Ritchie lines “southern fairies” and “northern monkeys”
I get the impression the southerners are considered more posh and perhaps more metropolitan? While the northerners are perhaps more brash, blue collar and let’s say match less refined - as a stereotype?
And it seems the Welsh get the worst of the jokes?
Reagan got about 58 percent of the vote, but one the most Electoral College votes ever, winning 49 States in 1984
In the US we say red sky sailor's delight
Janet ! 😂😂
16:53~16:59
Spoken like a true Welsh girl.
Never seen such a quick wit on someone
You mean Lee, right?
13:50 My favourite bit is Stacey Dooley's....
16:08 she's so innocent
I love the accents here ... and Alex almost freeze there , it almost sent me
I'm Welsh, and Alex Jones.... usually gets right up my nose ad she acts so dim... rarely funny, but for once, I giggled at that comment about the skirt and who cares... there may be hope yet!
I really liked Stacy Dooley. Bit like a cockney Louis Theroux...
Red sky at night sailors delight is the one I know.
3:33 😂😂😂
Can someone explain the maths David uses in the handglider question😭
I just want to point out that in countdown rules.. 5,3,2 can make 6. So technically he rolled what he said he would
😂😂😂😂😂😂❤
13:11 5+3-2
13:14 5 +3 - 2 = 6 tbf
That's not how airbags are triggered
18:10 ... SAILORS ... " Red sky at night ; SAILORS delight - Red sky in morning ; SAILORS take warning "
The sky reflects whether there are Storm Clouds/ Rain Storms on the horizon ...
" Red Sky " means clear whether approaching ... no "red sky" reflected in the sky means there are NO clouds / rain storms coming.
What's being black got to do with not knowing 'red sky at night'? I imagine a lot of black people know it.
Shepherd? o.O ..... nono. "Red skies at night SAILOR'S delight. Red skies in morning sailors take warning."
That makes a lot more sense than "shepherd" doesn't it?
Nope, Shepherd makes as much sense as Sailor or any other profession whose work can be affected by inclement weather
From east ireland, Shepard was said
I've always it as Shepard's delight 😊
I would have asked for a mini skirt drop demonstration!!!
The airbag story was obviously false because if it were true that car company would have paid him tons of money and had him sign an nda.
He could have turned the money down. Or the car company might believe it was his fault.
By that logic, we shouldn’t hear about any major car defect, ever.
It was clearly false because that's just not how air bags work
@@SKa-tt9nm we basically don’t hear about car defects until a recall. 99% of the time when a car manufacturing error causes a problem for a customer they compensate them and have them sign an nda.
@@willisveryniceno, they don't.
I don't get the two thirds quarter thing that David said. The tree is 3/3 parts high. The man was 2/3 parts up.
It's mostly based on how Lee stated the height of the tree. He said the height is how high the guy was plus a third. The "third", based on how he says it, is a third of the height of the man from the ground. Which wouldn't put him 2/3 up but 3/4. Lee isn't using the height of the tree as the reference but the height if the MAN in the tree. So, the tree is 150 ft high. The man is 100 ft in it. The man is 2/3 the way up the tree. But the height, as Lee says is, is the height of the man (100 ft) plus X. The X would be 1/3 IF the reference was the overall height but it wasn't, it was the height of the man. We know that X is 50 ft, therefor it is half of the height if the man in the tree.
So, if the man is 100 ft up a 150 ft tree, the remaining height of the tree is half of the previous height, not 1/3. You, and Lee, were looking at it from the overall height but David, rightly, is looking at it from the way Lee stated it.
I had to listen to that damn thing three times to get it
It bugs me that everyone just believes that David is correct about the tree-math issue, when it was just a semantic issue, not maths at all. When Lee says 'plus a third', he obviously means another third of the tree, but when David says 'plus a half', he means a half of the total height the man is at. The most natural understanding is 'plus another third of the tree', and it was really a kind of bigotry that the 'posh guy' is the clever one, plus Lee's lack of confidence on the spot, that allowed David's deliberate misunderstanding to sound like poor maths on Lee's part.
@@solomonoftm Thanks a lot.
@@zantas-handle Lee clearly didn't get it in that moment but went along because David must be right haha.
@@rickyanthony Exactly. Even Lee was intimidated by David's challenge, and just caved in without argument!
Menacing Lee
Nauseatingly desperate for airtime Lee.
Punished Lee, a man denied his truth.
8:21 Lie. That's only one die, not 'dice'.
dice is singular you muppet
@@juda815 dice is now used for both but originally dice was only the plural so die was singular.
@@juda815 No it's not?
if there's any other actual oscar winner besides Olivia Colman that's appeared on the show (regardless of the timing of the win) I can't think of any
(and btw, yes I am an american and pretty much embarrassed to be one anymore, but this is not me suggesting that the oscars are "better" than the baftas or anything like that lol but they certainly are different, and bafta winners are surely at least a bit more common in the show's lore)
Richard Grant nominee
@@heidinewkirk2692 good catch!
Olivia has worked with David since the Cambridge Footlight days and was one of the main supporting cast members on That Mitchell & Webb Sound/Look. Before that they were on a sketch show with Martin Freeman called Bruiser.
It's a die, ffs.
Ranked 5th isn't much of a boast.
Where do you think you would rank ?
In the country? Are you alright? It's a massive boast. It could be bigger, but it's still pretty damn impressive
@@rakadoni8403 I'd have ranked at about stench.
It bugs me that everyone just believes that David is correct about the tree-math issue, when it was just a semantic issue, not maths at all. When Lee says 'plus a third', he obviously means another third of the tree, but when David says 'plus a half', he means a half of the total height the man is at. The most natural understanding is 'plus another third of the tree', and it was really a kind of bigotry that the 'posh guy' is the clever one, plus Lee's lack of confidence on the spot, that allowed David's deliberate misunderstanding to sound like poor maths on Lee's part.
it bugs me that you are trying to turn this into class thing when they make so much fun of David.
Bigotry?! Don’t be absurd. They all play into their characters for comic effect.
David is famous for his pedantry. I think someone better at me would need to determine what the reference was, but Olivia asked how tall the tree was, and lee stated it was where the man was plus a third. In the original assessment the person's position was relative to the tree 2/3, but Lee changed the height to be relative to where the man was. David picked up on that and suggested that it couldn't be both of those descriptions at one time. I believe that David is correct that formally Lee changed the reference point linguistically speaking. However, I believe that Lee's informal description would be sufficient for the average person.
@@anotheruserism *Lee, they were making fun of Lee. David was absolutely right.
@@galinageorgieva8554 try and keep up. The OP was saying they assumed David was right simply because David is supposedly posh. I was pointing out that they make fun of David about being posh so it obviously isn't a class thing like the OP was foolishly suggesting
intellingece and whit i have neither .. but combine the two and magic happens
Slags