Thankfully nowadays there isn't a single person who isn't capable of solving the Navier-Stokes equations, as well as properly simulating highly turbulent fluid flow with incredibly high Reynolds numbers, all without running into simulation divergence.
King Brundle!!! So glad he will run the BBC commentary team in 2011 and beyond. He knows exactly how to balance the information to the variety of F1 fans.
I watched 1 video about car mechanism, and CZcams filled my recommended with F1 videos. Never been bothered with F1 before but apparently I'm a fan now..
If anyone is wondering how to stop this from happening, all you need to do is go to your youtube history and delete the video you watched from it. That will remove all recommendations afterwards.
A very good beginners course of basic aerodynamics used in a racing application, but what it lacks is altitude from the track at any given time and angle of attack of the body to the airflow.
"The upturn of the underfloor forces an expansion of the air and therefore a pressure drop..." I would have thought it was the other way around. Area increases; velocity decreases; pressure increases. But I am sure Martin Brundle has the perfect comeback for this comment, as usual.
Look up "Red Bull F1 vortice creation" and watch the live onboard in the rain in brazil. Adrian Newey is a genius. The moisture in the air actually builds up long enough for you to see the spirals of air created by the flaps etc off the front wing and around the side pod. It's one of the most amazing things F1 aero related that i've ever seen.
@@marktakac8337 No, they are just not as good as MB. Nobody is as good. Even their last year car isn't as good as this year - by far. Their new rear and front suspension is extremely good and helps them achieve higher speeds in corners and also in straight (more balanced) and the new engine, the new transmission, the new updated aero, etc. MB is a class of its own. Everybody else is just chasing them. Max was so far from Lew, it was not even funny anymore. 35seconds in 70 laps ? RBR says their design will get closer to MB but they can't set it up yet. Too complex. RBR traditionally like this, their design is very complex and they always needed 4-5 races to fully understand their design. Hopefully it will happen faster as they are already lacking a lot of points and this season will be short.
You got to respect the people that create these machines not to mentions the drivers who drive them to the limit in an effort to make them much much faster , it’s such an amazing creation f1cars
Awesome video! Specialy if comparison in 2017/2018 front wings that have much more elements, like 6 or more wing blades just in front "wing" lol!! But it's a old video and it's very usefull maily because this "smoke simulation" it was very nice and informative at least to me!! Thank you Kweli25!! I hope to find more great videos like this!! :)) :D :D
The aerodynamics at the front of the car is important in cleaning up the air going into the sidepods, airbox, and undertray. Then the rear wing and diffuser aids in literally sucking the air out from under the car at an accelerated rate, creating a low pressure zone under the car that 'vacuums' it to the surface. Over the car however, the more air flow you can cleanly get to the rear wing, the better. That creates more of a pressure differential between the upper and under portions of the car.
@oatcakepastymatt Diffusion of air mean spreading molecules. Look up diffusion, it is basically when molecules arrives into a space where there is a low concentration of it and due to heat it will by it self spread out to cover the whole room evenly (not taking into account the mass of the different molecules). In the diffuser of a car the air is forced underneath the car and when it hits the diffuser it is spread out into a larger space which will create a low pressure in the diffuser.
@mackenzie684 I see, I was more attacking his explanation of negative lift. There tends to be one common explanation " low pressure/ high pressure air" which has been proved to be only half of what is happening to create lift.
Wow, the aerodynamics were soooooooo simple compared to now. It's all about vortices now. I'm definitely looking forward to having simpler front wings again (in 2022).
@toob247 Yes, all the gobs and globs create downforce as a payoff for the drag. My point is that a better written set of rules would allow the makers to clean the cars up and provide even more downforce. It seems that all the teeny bits are there to get around the rules. Of course, the best thing for cutting drag would be to enclose the wheels, but then people would say it's not F-1 any more. Cheers.
Ótimo e ilustrativo vídeo apresentado por Martin Brundle o rival do "Grande Senna" na F.3 Inglesa. Mas eu acho que esta caríssima aerodinâmica de "aviação à avessas" descaracterizou o conceito básico do que é um automóvel (incluindo aí a "carnificina dos pneus") e não reverte nada de real uso prático à grande industria automobilística, sendo este sempre o argumento usado para se justificar os altos gastos no constante desenvolvimento e prototipagem característico na Formula 1. Afinal ! Como aerodinâmica só começa realmente a ser efetiva a partir de uns 120 km, bólidos, "free ways(s)" e "autobahn(s)" são minorias.
@mackenzie684 Thats exactly my point . I knew everything you said here , cuz im a F1 fan and mechanical enthusiast , so this is kindergarden stuff for me but , P.S. U said exactly what i did , only the long version. Downforce = Negative Lift = Suction
many people argue that nascar is a challenging racing sport because of its high speed and long durations, but that still does not make it more challenging than formula one. formula one drivers face the same tough long endurance challenges, except that they have to make turns at every corner, accelerate, decelerate, face up to 4Gs of lateral acceleration and etc. formula one truly takes both endurance and skill (so does rally, but that's a different story)
I would like to see the use of pressure sensors,electric actuators that can change the position of the airfoils when it traction is compromised. Maybe even morphing the shape for even more precise control.Camber,caster, toe changes could help,but it really comes down to how much is it worth,does it make the cars safer,then I say it's worth implicating it.They should use a driver's pod,like boat racing,too many driver's have been killed or injured. i would like to see the
@mackenzie684 Wrong . Negative lift isn't responsible for downforce , negative lift or suction is downforce . Its like a vacuum cleaner efect , that sucks car to the asphalt :P
Normally we want low pressure(to create ground effect or Venturi effect) underneath the car but why in 2012 they are using a high chassis(except Mclaren). They say, we want to increase the air flow underneath the car, this will increase the pressure underneath the car which isn't good. Can anyone explain this to me?
Ovals can be boring at times granted but Nascar does have a couple road courses. One being one of the founding courses for F1 Racing. Watkins Glen, New York. Was one of the first places in the States to host The F1 Grand Prix back in 1961. They put the race together in 6 weeks. Pretty impressive if you ask me.
Look at that cutting edge 00s animation...
Jesus fucking christ on a pogo stick Steve, a bit cranky were you?
@@snakerman2612 man get that lamppost of a stick off your arse
Steve from Yellowstone well that’s a bit of an overreaction
@@Eeter26 someone tell me what he said
@@Eeter26 if you want the dee i am sure i can provide it
Fun fact: a lobster is more aerodynamic than a jeep
Aarush Swarup Sarkar fun why the fuck would I need to know that?
Fun fact: Because they live in water they need streamlined body to swim with less drag
Imagine how difficult would be for a fish to swim if it had a box shape
So is a cow actually.
🤣lol
As a huge f1 fan, Martins voice just sounds like home on a Sunday afternoon
Ah yes. Back when the aerodynamics were “complicated”
Thankfully nowadays there isn't a single person who isn't capable of solving the Navier-Stokes equations, as well as properly simulating highly turbulent fluid flow with incredibly high Reynolds numbers, all without running into simulation divergence.
@@purungo except one youtube commenter
@@purungo
Well done
@@purungo Guess what ... a friend of mine solved it during his exam. I wonder why he failed it. :/
2008 aero regs would easily produce the highest downforce cars
King Brundle!!!
So glad he will run the BBC commentary team in 2011 and beyond.
He knows exactly how to balance the information to the variety of F1
fans.
damn we need this thing every season to show how the air goes around the new car
I watched 1 video about car mechanism, and CZcams filled my recommended with F1 videos. Never been bothered with F1 before but apparently I'm a fan now..
That would be hilarious if that's how you got into the sport
Worse things could end up in your recommended box
The Potato You should be honoured.F1 is the premier motosport in terms of the fastest lap times in the world
@Dr.Cemong shut up
If anyone is wondering how to stop this from happening, all you need to do is go to your youtube history and delete the video you watched from it. That will remove all recommendations afterwards.
Somebody share this video to Williams plz!
It is true because i've just blowed the smoke of my joint out of my mouth towards the front of an F1 model car and it worked.
AtrolinK
Science
same
AtrolinK: Don’t cough though. It creates turbulence.
"...with Martin Brundle"
I don't care what it is, as long Martin Brundle's presenting it, I'm in
2:47 "10 cylinders" good old days
+Fahim Mir Agree! But thanks to technologies nowadays we only use something like 1.6L V6, save some gas, still fast as hell :D
+Fahim Mir yeah i was like 10 cylinders i needa check how old this video is.
+Nguyen Duong 2.6 Liter V6 2017
Miguelplays_YT i dont know where you got that from, its still 1.6
I thought the same thing! Miss those days
We all need to pay absolute respect to Martin Brundle... definitely a living legend, F1 will be quite boring without him...
Too bad the smoke wasn't real...
Just get it to follow a McLaren.
Eaton Asher do t they call that force vapors or something
or weak ass hacking photosvop pathetic skills
Eaton Asher that was the only reason why i clicked on the video😭
But those dad jeans sure are
Eaton Asher I
I was just watching a cat on a piano, Now I'm in formula 1 aerodynamics.
A very good beginners course of basic aerodynamics used in a racing application, but what it lacks is altitude from the track at any given time and angle of attack of the body to the airflow.
"The upturn of the underfloor forces an expansion of the air and therefore a pressure drop..." I would have thought it was the other way around. Area increases; velocity decreases; pressure increases. But I am sure Martin Brundle has the perfect comeback for this comment, as usual.
Extremely helpful in understanding aerodynamics great video.
i would love to see comparison from older to newer f1 aero using this smoke to show how much has changed over time
Well
Time for an all aerodynamic build in f1 2020
that's no real smoke, but yeah
red bull got it so right from 2010-2013
Look up "Red Bull F1 vortice creation" and watch the live onboard in the rain in brazil. Adrian Newey is a genius. The moisture in the air actually builds up long enough for you to see the spirals of air created by the flaps etc off the front wing and around the side pod. It's one of the most amazing things F1 aero related that i've ever seen.
yes but now they suck😂
@@marktakac8337 No, they are just not as good as MB. Nobody is as good. Even their last year car isn't as good as this year - by far. Their new rear and front suspension is extremely good and helps them achieve higher speeds in corners and also in straight (more balanced) and the new engine, the new transmission, the new updated aero, etc. MB is a class of its own. Everybody else is just chasing them. Max was so far from Lew, it was not even funny anymore. 35seconds in 70 laps ? RBR says their design will get closer to MB but they can't set it up yet. Too complex. RBR traditionally like this, their design is very complex and they always needed 4-5 races to fully understand their design. Hopefully it will happen faster as they are already lacking a lot of points and this season will be short.
@@oldwortex5818 Ok. I was just saying thatthey were better in 2013 than this year... well at least for me
You got to respect the people that create these machines not to mentions the drivers who drive them to the limit in an effort to make them much much faster , it’s such an amazing creation f1cars
Brilliant explanation, hail Martin Brundle
Good and understandable video mate ! well done !
Awesome video! Specialy if comparison in 2017/2018 front wings that have much more elements, like 6 or more wing blades just in front "wing" lol!! But it's a old video and it's very usefull maily because this "smoke simulation" it was very nice and informative at least to me!! Thank you Kweli25!! I hope to find more great videos like this!! :)) :D :D
great vid keep on good work.
hold my beer, I'm heading to HomeDepot to buy some materials for my civic. fucking GTRs wont know what coming
this is really amazing video :)
Thats a brilliant video!
Song is "In My Arms-Mylo"
“All 10 cylinders” RIP
The aerodynamics at the front of the car is important in cleaning up the air going into the sidepods, airbox, and undertray. Then the rear wing and diffuser aids in literally sucking the air out from under the car at an accelerated rate, creating a low pressure zone under the car that 'vacuums' it to the surface. Over the car however, the more air flow you can cleanly get to the rear wing, the better. That creates more of a pressure differential between the upper and under portions of the car.
Excellent! Thanks!
Nice vid!
Brundle is legendary at explaining all things F1
...не вундеркинд...
This is the dream job for any ME or AAE :)
Such a great guy!
First time seeing this video and Martin so young
Now I want to see martin brundle’s aerodynamics
hearing "all 10 cylinders" is enough to make a grown man cry
Props to the editors. That CG must have been a major pain in the ass...
Music is: Mylo - Into My Arms, for those wondering!
Tnx,was looking for it!
Hahah... thanks! I was trying to figure out!
Thank you! 🙏
@oatcakepastymatt Diffusion of air mean spreading molecules. Look up diffusion, it is basically when molecules arrives into a space where there is a low concentration of it and due to heat it will by it self spread out to cover the whole room evenly (not taking into account the mass of the different molecules).
In the diffuser of a car the air is forced underneath the car and when it hits the diffuser it is spread out into a larger space which will create a low pressure in the diffuser.
awesome
very interesting!
Glad I found this gem lol
two different types of cars and different tracks.I like both,F1 is my favorite,I enjoy drag racing too,that a whole other monster.
@mackenzie684 I see, I was more attacking his explanation of negative lift. There tends to be one common explanation " low pressure/ high pressure air" which has been proved to be only half of what is happening to create lift.
cool man! I see F1 is not just about fast cars and proffesional drivers. There's a bit of science that's also involved ! Thanks
It's mostly science
Nice Vid
Wow, the aerodynamics were soooooooo simple compared to now. It's all about vortices now. I'm definitely looking forward to having simpler front wings again (in 2022).
But if you think of it more complex is better, because the advancements improve the quality of the sport.
would love to see with a current car
0:09 When they sound like that again, I'll watch it again.
Ash Scott m what a true fan
No one misses you.
Martin Brundle ist very good!
God, now only i understand completely about this thing! im sitting for an exam next week and the spotted question is about this thing.
@rubnayr yea he has already said that " negative lift " is present here which is responsible for the body stability ...
it must be the RB1. the RB2 used a V8 instead of a V10. and martin said in the video that the air is needed for the 10 cylinders ;)
3:44 de mesela DRS kullanıldığında daha fazla Downforce mu elde ediliyor ?
wicked video
To the guy asking for the song, it's "Mylo - In Your Arms"
And thats why i love f1
Great Vid!! Now even my girlfriend understands aerodynamic downforce.
Nice Look isaw. #construction
Thanks for posting, it's a good clear view of how aerodynamics work. Is this the 07 car?
2006
Exactly! The Car was less big and even lighter, which leads to more speed.
But well, Nascar and Formula 1 have their advantages and disadvantages.
Wow, that looks soo simple compared to this year's cars...
awesome video, anyone know the song?
Good video,
Can anybody also tell me, what´s the name of the background song?
Thanks!
Epic
wow..... great!!best!!! I love f1 oh my god!!~
@toob247
Yes, all the gobs and globs create downforce as a payoff for the drag. My point is that a better written set of rules would allow the makers to clean the cars up and provide even more downforce. It seems that all the teeny bits are there to get around the rules. Of course, the best thing for cutting drag would be to enclose the wheels, but then people would say it's not F-1 any more. Cheers.
Ótimo e ilustrativo vídeo apresentado por Martin Brundle o rival do "Grande Senna" na F.3 Inglesa. Mas eu acho que esta caríssima aerodinâmica de "aviação à avessas" descaracterizou o conceito básico do que é um automóvel (incluindo aí a "carnificina dos pneus") e não reverte nada de real uso prático à grande industria automobilística, sendo este sempre o argumento usado para se justificar os altos gastos no constante desenvolvimento e prototipagem característico na Formula 1. Afinal ! Como aerodinâmica só começa realmente a ser efetiva a partir de uns 120 km, bólidos, "free ways(s)" e "autobahn(s)" são minorias.
This reminded me of initial D’s smoke scenes
why have a loud ass fan in the background if the smoke isn't real🤦🏾♂️
Shut up
@mackenzie684 Thats exactly my point . I knew everything you said here , cuz im a F1 fan and mechanical enthusiast , so this is kindergarden stuff for me but , P.S. U said exactly what i did , only the long version. Downforce = Negative Lift = Suction
many people argue that nascar is a challenging racing sport because of its high speed and long durations, but that still does not make it more challenging than formula one.
formula one drivers face the same tough long endurance challenges, except that they have to make turns at every corner, accelerate, decelerate, face up to 4Gs of lateral acceleration and etc. formula one truly takes both endurance and skill (so does rally, but that's a different story)
10 cylinders? I knew this was outdated the second I saw that basic little front wing
thanks ....
This was the most basic basics.. Where can I find a more advanced aeordynamic explanation?
I would like to see the use of pressure sensors,electric actuators that can change the position of the airfoils when it traction is compromised. Maybe even morphing the shape for even more precise control.Camber,caster, toe changes could help,but it really comes down to how much is it worth,does it make the cars safer,then I say it's worth implicating it.They should use a driver's pod,like boat racing,too many driver's have been killed or injured.
i would like to see the
9 years later: DRS, DAS, Halo, tons of flexiwings banned. All further increasing the cost and hurt competition
I like how there's disturbed air near his legs and body 1:26
3:42 I didn't know Red Bull was powered by Merc engines in 2005?
They had Cosworth at first, not Mercedes.
You obviously missed the sarcastic remark :) But listen to the engine sounds and compare that to a real Cosworth. Nothing alike ;)
So it has to have enough downforce to stick to the ground but not the much so it wont generate drag right..? makes sense
This is David Coulthards car which places it between 2005 and 2008. How much more advanced is the whole package now??
whats the song in the background
The mid 2000s cars were so fucking pretty.
That cg smoke is pretty impressive.
The cg Brundle could use some work.
Thanks youtube after 10years
whats the last song??
@mackenzie684 Wrong . Negative lift isn't responsible for downforce , negative lift or suction is downforce . Its like a vacuum cleaner efect , that sucks car to the asphalt :P
better question. why did they use a real fan?
lol yup you are 100% right on that
They do a few road course tracks in Nascar.....
do you know the difference between downforce and weight? only one of them produces more weight as the car goes faster
Does anyone know of any software to measure the aerodynamics of models on computers?
Normally we want low pressure(to create ground effect or Venturi effect) underneath the car but why in 2012 they are using a high chassis(except Mclaren). They say, we want to increase the air flow underneath the car, this will increase the pressure underneath the car which isn't good. Can anyone explain this to me?
Ovals can be boring at times granted but Nascar does have a couple road courses. One being one of the founding courses for F1 Racing. Watkins Glen, New York. Was one of the first places in the States to host The F1 Grand Prix back in 1961. They put the race together in 6 weeks. Pretty impressive if you ask me.
2:42 -->2018: RIP 4 cylinders.
What model is this car? RB1 from 2005 or RB2 from 2006
need for speed told me the drafting sling shot method of passing is the best. 😁
Best Sport in the world !!!
Imagine Adrian Newey explaining the aerodynamics