1960’S NASA ANIMATED " APOLLO LUNAR MISSION PROFILE ” OVERVIEW OF MOON MISSION EXPLAINER XD48854
Vložit
- čas přidán 11. 02. 2022
- Want to support this channel and help us preserve old films? Visit / periscopefilm
Visit our website www.PeriscopeFilm.com
Dating to 1965, this sophisticated animated NASA film "Apollo Lunar Mission Profile" provides an in-depth look at the manned lunar mission. The film opens with the NASA seal (:11). The Moon’s surface is riddled with craters (:23). These images had been taken from the unmanned space probe; Ranger VII, prior to the craft crashing on the moon’s surface. The mode selected to make the Apollo lunar landing possible was called a lunar rendezvous orbit (:53). A space shuttle is captured during take off utilizing rocket thrust (2:06). The captive firing of the first stage of three stages of the Apollo Saturn V space vehicle follows (2:18). Tests are conducted on the second stage’s engines (2:24). Captive firing of the third stage then takes place (2:26). A diagram is presented showing the five F1 engines (2:41), five J2 engines in the second stage (2:59) and the single J2 engine in the third stage (3:12). Tests are conducted on the launch escape system located on the top of the space craft (3:41). Portions of the Apollo space craft (3:53) are highlighted including the service module (3:57) and the lunar excursion module (4:00). The service module (4:45) and the LEM are then broken down in diagram (5:44). Ground facilities for final preparations and launching of the space vehicle are visited (5:54) in Florida and Houston, Texas. The vehicle assembly building at launch complex 39 (6:10) at the Kennedy Center is shown (6:10). The prime tool used for moving the craft is the crawler transporter (7:01). The launch pad area is zoomed in on (7:12). The launch control center is attached to the vehicle assembly building (7:29). Mission control centers are situated at the Manned Space Center (7:36) and the Space Craft Center at southeast Houston. Satellites set out in remote stations are used to provide tracking (8:03). The Boeing KC-135 Stratotanker is captured in flight (8:06). One of the remote sites used to collect information is viewed (8:14). Flight crews undergo trainings in academic class room courses (9:19). A simulator is utilized for hands on trainings (9:28). A diagram is depicted drawing attention to the three stages of the Saturn V launch vehicle (10:11). The point where the shuttle must be launched from in Florida is shown (11:25). The launch window is only about four hours (12:25). Two weeks prior to the launch, tracing ships are sent out as the remote recovery forces begin (12:55). Ground support missions are equipped and manned (13:02). The Mission Control Center at Houston and the Launch Control Center at Cape Kennedy monitor the operations (13:04). A diagram shows the pre-flight phase (13:19). A final simulated flight wraps up the testing (13:48). Once this is completed, the 24-hour count down begins (13:59). The mobile servicing structure slowly moves forward (14:13). The mission director is pointed to as to whom will receive the final reports and authorize the mission to continue (14:36). The launch director begins the automatic launch sequencer (14:41). A diagram shows how the craft first rises vertically and then begins a pitch over maneuver (14:57). The first stage burnout follows (15:39) as well as the command and service module separation (15:51). The vehicle has entered safe orbit after the second stage is jettisoned (16:27) and the boost phase is enacted (16:51). The vehicle is to make two orbits prior to heading for the moon (17:12). Landing areas are pre-determined (18:01). The second stage is re-ignited (19:27), cruising controls are set (19:27) and the transposition stage begins. After the adapter panels are opened (19:35), the module separates. A docking maneuver is depicted (19:59). The LEM is separated (22:28) after two crew members move into it. Here the crew would check for landing (23:35) and the LEM would touch down (24:20). Status reports and surveys are conducted (24:31). Selected instruments are to be left on the moon in order to conduct further studies (25:06). A rendezvous maneuver is to be conducted (27:00) to enable the lunar explorers to return to the command module (27:07). The LEM and service modules continue to orbit the Moon (27:23). As the craft moves back to the Earth, communications with ground crews begin again (24:40). The re-entry corridor is looked at showing how the module must enter (28:24). Parachutes are released including the drogue chutes (29:50), pilot chutes (29:55), and the main chutes (29:57). Actual footage from a capsule recovery in the sea follows (30:08). The film wraps up (30:51).
This film is part of the Periscope Film LLC archive, one of the largest historic military, transportation, and aviation stock footage collections in the USA. Entirely film backed, this material is available for licensing in 24p HD, 2k and 4k. For more information visit www.PeriscopeFilm.com
Never get tired of these films. Cheers!!
NEVER !
Ever!👍
I Know.
the geniuses who worked out all of this were on another level.
20 years of absolute amazing 💩
Just amazing. I remember getting woken up so we could watch the first lunar landing as a kid Such an accomplishment.
I'm 7 years old again! Fantastic stuff, thanks.
The greatest "Hold my beer" event in the history of mankind.
with the help of they so called good Nazis 😂😂😂😂
@@rahulkarmakar5183 No, they're German. Von Braun only ever became a Nazi so that he could continue his rocket research and development. And in developing the V2, he essentially caused the Germans to divert resources to a very expensive weapon that was never going to change their fortunes at all.
@@rahulkarmakar5183 No, they´re German Scientists, just like Ferdinand Porsche was an automotive designer and Volkswagens were mobile cars and not a political piece.
Wernher Magnus Maximilian von Braun was born Prussian and Pennemude was so isolated that not even the ruling elite of the blitz war country knew where it was.
It would be like saying that NASA would be "Democrat" or "Republican" or "Communist", assuming we have several parties available for affiliation and even as the only option, the NDSAP did not completely control the people, German or not.
@@jagone5672
Has the nominee been indicted by any Court?
Has he been denounced for some kind of Offence?
Did he serve a sentence equivalent to his conviction?
Was he guilty under Current Law for something he did?
Was he punished socially and economically for his past?
So, did the aforementioned face any kind of Legal Judgment?
So, was the scientist indicted for having committed any Crime?
Was his social reintegration partial, unproductive and Criminal?
In addition, while the cannon barrels were in vivid hot coals burnning and bombing half of the European continent, Berliners skated in public parks and watched the operas, so, in this regime of exception, few knew what the Élite in charge did and the scientists are included in this profile.
@@rahulkarmakar5183 They were Patriots all wanting to fight a real ennemy, VB was Nazi he joined volontairly the war efforts, may not wanted to be SS but he did to continue playing with rockets. He was mostly used as PR man in NASA, spent lot time with DISNEY promoting SCIFI.
Rudolf Hartmann was the real brains behind SATURN rocket and much more shown as a war criminal.
The best explanation I've seen. Ever.
This is an amazingly well done info-video. Covers a whole lot of areas of knowledge
10 year old me would have lived to see that animation in the late 1960s. It would have been the greatest moment of my life with the exception of watching the whole thing unfold for real on television a few years later.
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
I love all these Apollo Videos!!!!!
👍👍👌👌🤙👏👏
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Thanks for this👍🚀
Awesome video
Sweet! More NASA archival footage and video releases if you've got them, please.🙏🌎🚀🌌
Right.... who doesn't love science fiction!?
@@BeachMongoose Fact, not fiction.
@@BeachMongoose ==== Please don't tell me you're a flat earther?
@@BeachMongoose You really don't understand any of this do you.
@@paulward4268 I understand it more than most actually. So, have a ball with Nazi propaganda. And if you didn't know Nazis started NASA, look up Operation Paperclip.
Considering the time it was produced, the quality level of this video is second none. Amazing just as what unfolded afterwards.
Science. It’s a good thing.
The last few years notwithstanding. Too many deniers is a bad omen.
Sure, but royal ACADEMIA power isnt, ITs be wrong many times and will be.
ITs very human....
Well yea Scientologists haven’t helped over the past several decades
Absurdly perfect animation and for the first time in decades I was able to have my own discoveries acquiring here more than 25 detailed specifications which either I couldn't find a source to understand them or I didn't understand what I thought of the epic Project Apollo-Saturn V.
Infographics are simply killers and as we don't have realisms, the didactic simplicity reaches the thought with abysmal depth because we have to "fill the gaps" mentally.
As it is impossible to demonstrate any subject or theme graphically when the scale is too grandiose, we have the false and childish impression that the whole procedure seems easy, close and obvious but it is on account of this very monumental scale involved of which, just as a recent example, We still haven't managed to find the Boeing 777 of Malaysian Air Lines from flight MH370 to this date:
The World is a very, very big thing!
Several of the characters in the still illustrations have the same face and this is delightful to observe in conflict with the amplified, omnipresent - and often wasteful - visual culture that we have and cultivate today, accessible and universal.
I already understood several of the procedures but some of the specifications are to freeze the spine, as in the translunar injection in an orbit with the correct angle and even scarier, detonate a huge tractor rocket driving the spacecraft to an empty place, because our Natural Satellite only there will be in a matter of three days on a meteoric journey.
Or the maneuvers to escape the intended trajectories, aiming to abort the mission and lead it to a process of safeguarding the men on board and their return to Earth, see Apollo 13.
The lift-off of the LEM being blown up above its landing gear makes this incredible craft the best example of Form Follows Function, perhaps the most beautiful "alien" artifact we've ever designed.
The terrestrial entry window, a sinister astonishment, the capsule shrouded in plasma at millions of degrees centigrade like an ignited meteoroid, the parachute deployment, the splashdown (By Thor, the Russians land on Earth!!!), the recovery of the men and the capsule...
... in a saga with billions of moving parts, all with a gugolplexic potential to go wrong and yet 26 of us have stepped into our beautiful and vital Earth~Moon binary system.
Kuddos to Herr Wernher Magnus Maximilian von Braun and my immense thanks to the 385,000 smart people who contributed to the greatest saga we have ever been able to conquer, not yet overcome.
AHEAD !!!
PS: The LEM Descent and touchdown under an amazing aproch here: czcams.com/video/xc1SzgGhMKc/video.html
You are either lying about (lack of) understanding or lying about composing the 'comment.' Or you're a blowhard. You're definitely like those half dozen blowhard teachers that loved to hear their own voices when most of us learned more the less they talked. Not a compliment. Deuces.
Your beautiful prose of my thoughts exactly, as I have never had it explained in such a visual and understandable scientific description as this wonderful documentary says to me. My true regret in life was not being interested nor motivated enough to learn simple scientific principles to ignite in an interest of science as an adolescent. Alas, I became interested in life medical sciences in mid life and have no regrets, became a professional Registered Nurse, but continue a voracious appetite for increased knowledge of all sciences, especially aeronautical and the aircraft sciences. I really cannot get enough of these historical documents of the early rocket sciences. I'm overwhelmed with the emotion of lost possibilities, but trying to make up for lost time. Thank you Periscope Film for preserving these documents, as you are my go to CZcams entertainment daily.
I cannot believe some people thinking this was faked. Faith in something anyone has can achieve great things.
Watch David Weiss interviews his channel is DITRH
Watch DITRH's video titled NASA: Always trying to cover their screwups. Buzz Aldrin said his moon landing footage was animation.
Sure anyone can animate. Go stand next to a rocket, then talk to those who made it possible. The small people of the world just try to stir the pot. There are more of us who lived during that time and know how awesome we are on earth. Try striving to be great instead.
@@jagone5672 Very sorry you feel that way to call me mislead. It's just not worth my time to compete.
@@jagone5672 Most missiles don't compensate for the curve because they're tacking airborn targets. Cruise missiles actually do follow the curve.
This well made, sure lots of precision involve all the time, hard to get is the spinning is so insignificant for us how it can slingshoot so far. Would expect at least one of those nine missions to have missed the Moon and gotten lost. At this amazing hard work was done in much less than 10 years, near 5 fulltime nonstop efforts, wonder if #11 was ready for it.
You think the Earth's rotation is what slingshots a moon launch? Dude. And math doesn't give a sh*t about what you would expect to go wrong. Consider the possibility that thousands of top scientists and engineers were better at this stuff than you are.
The initial speed on the trajectory to the moon was far greater than the contribution from Earth's rotation.
Oho we got Barkers! Yes THAT what I understood, stuff speeds effortlessly carried by the spinning current.
"steal a tiny bit of it’s orbital motion" O MATHS does give a shit..... can say that again, nor does Godess Science what Scientists rant about :) Millions of Scientists experts professionals have gone wrong :)
Now how did IT get inicial? And then why not use full speed straight direction instead of doing some "falling" around the planet ??? So with our vortex racing at 500000 MPH after SUN the almighty APOLLO added a 24000 MPH ? = 524000 MPH interesting ....and the SUN (magnet) wasnt even behind Moon but far on the side durring this *3 day* flight..... now I understand "math doesn't give a sh*t about what you would expect'
👍
@@wildboar7473 What was that latest post of yours?
Was it a claim about something?
A question of some sort to someone?
Sorry, but I could not decipher what you are trying to say. Please re-phrase.
@@julesdomes6064 ...you serious or just usual troll play? Among all my ponderings I clearly ASKED HOW
that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *inicial* speed was gotten,
My Dad personally met Colonel Jim Irwin USAF; Apollo 15 Lunar Module Pilot, at Asbury Theological Seminary 🏫 Wilmore, Kentucky in the 1980’s.
I remember this from the late 1960s.
Interesting - the actual launch sequence started at T-9 seconds, with liftoff at 0. I think this must have been a revision to the timeline after this film was made.
Absolute insanity! The only thing that could ever compare to this feat now is figuring out time travel
How about FTL travel? That would be pretty sweet
IN the original plan, only one member of the crew was outside the LM at a time. ot was also prior to the redesign of the LM to eliminate the forward docking port and have a square egress hatch.
why have i never worked in an org on a project as well-organized as Apollo? Seems so so logical!
Back when Mylar EVA suits were a thing.
That was only on Gemini. They didn't really know about micometeors, and there were a lot less of them.
Jonathan -. Plus MANY other materials.
those are nice drawings. Does anybody know what type of drawing tools they used for that?
The illustrations and infographics are really sublime and they are the most current at the time, analogous to the omni-present CGI we have today.
At the time, they used a lot of nan-kin and were often subtly colored with gouache and watercolors, drawn on thick cardboard.
Some of the technical animations of this phase of dynamic drawing in a sequential narrative were made with lines pulling the object in the foreground sliding over the background and then being filmed continuously but not always the traction was accurate or the clipping was in position.
So most animations were frame-by-frame made in stacked layers with the background of the static scene and the moving object (like the Crawler) being moved millimetrically and photographed in sequence, so the side perspectives are avoided because it would force the change of the scales of the foreground objects compared to the main object and in "rising" motion.
@@jagone5672
Are you some kind of illustrator, art contractor or do you have a profile with a gift for drawing too?
It's just that if NASA hired a professional to execute these technical infographics that uses Crayons for the specification of these illustrations, we would be entering new portals of static Visual Arts.
Crayons leave an extremely coarse three-dimensional texture with visible traces in their tracks left on the thick cardboard, in addition to constituting an extremely oily and waxy visual expression medium which does not allow or admit any minimal type of finishing on the edges of the drawings. done, serving much more for preliminary drafts of ideas but never for finalizing graphic orders for final deliveries.
And Crayons leave uncontrollably aberrant shiny surfaces reflecting incident light from all sides, meaning it's the worst option in the world for anything finished with them to be photographed or filmed or even observed with the naked eye.
Assuming it's Crayon, congratulations to the very competent illustrator and sincere congratulations to NASA, innovating heavily as far as we could never have imagined they would come from how they arrived, promoting evolutions even in new forms of visual communication, albeit for the worst choices, considering the other artistic materials that we've always had available over the last 475 years of visual storytelling.
PS: I couldn't understand you with what you said here, with your "the type of crayon doesn't exist anymore."
Where did you get or conclude what you wrote?
Crayons have practically not changed much and have approximately the same appearance, shape, formulation, dimension and constituent raw materials, they are at least 5,000 years old in the civilized world, and can be admired to this day in very colorful and preserved Egyptian petroglyphs.
Of the current Crayons that we have in children's school supply stores, they are 16th century improvements but it's the same as always.
@@jagone5672
OTN & FYI, Crayons, in "this world of today" are still widely available across the entire planet Earth in over 365 different shades.
Under a funny mood, only now do I understand who you really are and also what wastes my life coming here trying to teach you as if you were 5 years old:
You are the guy who, in a previous comment here, saw a "coke bottle" on the control panel of the Apollo-Saturn V spacecraft.
A Coke Bottle.
Inside a brand-new spacecraft specified by 365,000 people to take us to the Moon and back safely to Earth, payloads collected from the natural satellite, included.
A COKE BOTTLE.
I quit...
COKE BOTTLE ON PANEL!
I wish I had another 1% of your vast incredible knowledge, it makes me unbelievable envy.
Hey, big and rare brain, come here, tell us the, hmmmm, "dreamers" here and stop secret little silly secrets:
So, that, uh, COKE BOTTLE (...) on the, well, ""fake spacecraft"" (...) dashboard was the one with very thick glass?
Who consumed the contents of the soda, was it Collins?
I bet so...
@@jagone5672 Oh, nice, so, it was an Aussie Coke Bottle on the panel, thanks so much to teach us deeply on nothing, yours, well, generosity counts a lot.
Now, back to canvas here, I need to dispatch an ordered artwork to Texas in a week.
it was a special gocu movie made in 1967 .
Note to flerfers: If NASA had 'faked' the moon landings, this is what it would have looked like.
And for the sake of "Fake" moon landings, Elliott Cee, Charlie Bassett, Gus Grissom, Ed White, Roger Chaffee and others were killed????
No it would have looked amazing. Stop using this excuse. We went to the damn moon!! I hate this excuse or the we forgot how excuse both are dumb and sound so stupid they make the conspiracy theorists look smart
@@Limit5482 I don't understand what you are arguing about. What am I making an excuse for?
@@MrWeezer55 you are telling the conspiracy believers a dumb excuse of why it wasn’t faked and what it would have looked like. It’s dumb and I hope you see that.
Why is it a ' dumb excuse '. They say it was faked, I'm saying it would have looked fake.
Is the sun angle the reason why the lunar orbit was retrograde? The gravitational couple is another reason but sun angle is more important.
I think so
It was retrograde for the free trajectory return ...just in case they failed to orbit the moon.
@@rockyduggan235 Mr. Duggan, Is a free return trajectory not possible with a pro-grade orbit? This retro vs pro was a question on one of my college finals many years ago in the days before calculators. We were given two hours to show the difference between the two. What you suggest was never discussed but it seems plausible to me.
My understanding is that the astronauts wanted to land with the sun at their backs for maximum visibility of the lunar surface.
Wow over 300k people are still keeping a secret that we never went to the moon....GTFOH!! This is REAL IT HAPPENED!!
@@davidgray5776 troll
@@geemanbmw The is no such numbers in the know, one way or other, astronauts and Direction is not, even Control didnt have firsthand.
@@davidgray5776 World War 1 really happened? PROVE it, you can't......
Note that just as Apollo hoaxtards I will summarily dismiss all your evidence as fake and lies and products of a vast worldwide conspiracy.
@@davidgray5776 You haven't proven that you're a rationally thinking human either.
@@davidgray5776 No..that's the wrong way round.
YOU PROVE it didn't.
Since good CGI was not available in 1969, it was easier for NASA to do it for real. Nine times to the Moon. Six times landing on the Moon. 12 Americans walking on the Moon. People were just smarter back then.
Amazing Fakery. My hat is off to the deception team! Impossible then, impossible now. Seriously, congratulations to the compartmentalized few who orchestrated the hoax. Fantastic work!
Public domain, so why the watermark? Or not public domain?
Here's the issue: Tens of thousands of films similar to this one have been lost forever -- destroyed -- and many others are at risk. Our company preserves these precious bits of history one film at a time. How do we afford to do that? By selling them as stock footage to documentary filmmakers and broadcasters. If we did not have a counter, we could not afford to post films like these online, and no films would be preserved. It's that simple. So we ask you to bear with the watermark and timecodes.
In the past we tried many different systems including placing our timer at the bottom corner of our videos. What happened? Unscrupulous CZcams users downloaded our vids, blew them up so the timer was not visible, and re-posted them as their own content! We had to use content control to have the videos removed and shut down these channels. It's hard enough work preserving these films and posting them, without having to spend precious time dealing with policing thievery -- and not what we devoted ourselves to do.
Love our channel and want to support what we do? You can help us save and post more orphaned films! Support us on Patreon: www.patreon.com/PeriscopeFilm Even a really tiny contribution can make a difference.
Animation: the technique of photographing successive drawings or positions of puppets or models to create an illusion of movement when the movie is shown as a sequence. So in other words, NASA equates to science fiction.
They did it for real, you know.
@@anzaca1 No, watch David Weiss his channel is DITRH
@@anzaca1 Bull´s Eye!
@@jagone5672 No, it didn't.
@@flat-earther Yeah, he's already been busted. He's wrong.
He said one guy at a time
David Blevins - An early plan. Many changes were made as the mission plan evolved through the years.
For as old as it was I don't think any more modern way to explain could be achieved. Our government makes a mistake once in awhile and does great. Lol
Everything so scientific and sophisticated but no one talks about that fateful moment ... the time to poo!.
That is how it should be done but it was done in Hollywoods Disney studio basement.
No, it wasn't.
Oof.
Much was shoot outdoors, Nevada, with Disney personel.
@@wildboar7473 And yet not a single disgruntled Disney employee admitted that "fact", ever.
@@artieeffham355 ? how many disgruntled employees does DISNEY have??? Doubt the college kid was amoung them, not just taking on DISNEY inc but the USA GOV NASA Agencies, not a very good prospect for your futur.... (ask Thomas Baron).
I read his nefew was one of few participant with nasa studios, freemasons not inclined to be "disgrunted".... :)
Description >>> /watch?v=fFs-iNNfU1I
I did listen to this , part of it, until my ears were full of B.S.......!
Stop listening. It doesn't really matter if you do or not.
Is all the shit leaking out of your head?
Must be because your ears are already packed full of ignorant conspiracy theorist nonsense, so there is no room for facts.
funny how in the 80's 90's everyone believed this bs lol
Because it really happened. There are literally mirrors they left on the moon.
@@anzaca1 You are so brainswashed... "THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DON'T BELIEVE ANYTHING UNTIL THEY SEE IT ON TELEVISION." RICHARD M NIXON, U.S. PRESIDENT
@@marcusaurelius3720 it was on telly, in England, 1969,,, ?
So how did EASEP, multiple ALSEP installations, and LLR make it to the lunar surface?
Funny how every asshole nobody on the internet claims it was faked.
It was faked!
Mark Dorr You are Totally Correct!!! More NASA BS!!
Spake is face.😂
So as long as you don´t understand something, it have to be fake? Perhaps you´re just not as smart as you think.
Fun fact; the technology required to fake the moon landing and make the footage look the way it does, didn't exist in the 1960s. It only exists today.
@@anzaca1 It doesn’t even exist today! There’s no way to fake 830 lbs. of lunar regolith and rocks! They were sent around the world to research centers and Universities and confirmed to be from the moon.
Fun fact: Apollo heat shield “special material” is 🪵 cork.
Uh, no. Phenolic epoxy resin placed in steel and fiberglass honeycomb.
@@booklover6753 you are right, I mixed it up with the boost protective cover over which had a cork layer ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19740007423/downloads/19740007423.pdf