Nobel Minds 2017
Vložit
- čas přidán 18. 01. 2018
- The 2017 Nobel Laureates met at the Grünewald Hall in the Stockholm Concert Hall in Stockholm for the traditional round-table discussion and TV program 'Nobel Minds'. The discussion was hosted by the BBC's Zeinab Badawi.
Copyright © BBC Global News Limited and SVT 2017
Don't miss Nobel Minds 2022 with this year's class of laureates. See it here: czcams.com/video/LutI8YqJkqM/video.html
Guinness world record for IQ per square meter
looooooooooool
don't disrespect the Solvay conference like that
yes! minus the host tho
Nobel prize for this discovery of scientific measurement IQ/m2 😂
andresemilfer that was actually a physics conference in Vienna(I think) in the 1920s, all great physicists were there.
Can’t help but feel sorry for the host. The format of this was basically attempting to individually interview the 15 or so Nobel winners with a very harsh time constraint that left no room for the interaction between them that everyone wanted to see. It meant she constantly had to cut off and interrupt them, making her look like a terrible interviewer.
Atleast someone here understood how hard it would have been at her part of the job unlike others criticising. 🙏🏼
Exactly!
Vedeo has cuts buddy
Yeah, you can tell that they wanted to dive into certain topics but this table would be having conversations for hours on certain topics
they organized this very poorly, 15 great minds squished into a 45 minute video. doesn’t make sense
The amount of respect that every scientist is giving to each other while speaking is amazing we don't see that often.
Because they all work for the same boss 😉
The new generation lost that
Its because they no longer have something to prove. When scientists disrespect each other, it stems from deep-rooted insecurities.
@@legenda4341 humbleness paired with communication skills
"We dont see that often" is a lie
17:43 “we are physicists, we worked in biology and we get the Nobel Prize in Chemistry” 😅👏🏿
This should have been a two hour conversation and without a host.
a better smarter host, but she tries
she did well, but deeper questions could have been asked, It must be difficult for her to be a host of such great minds, in different themes, it must be difficult for anyone. she did well but could have been better.
Trust me, 2 hrs is too short. I would listen till they stop.
bring a host is a thank less job
@@osemudiame123 agreed, but a more pleasant and less annoying one would have been better
So I'm 3 minutes in, and I'm already under the impression that the host is trying to wrap things up.
lmao
introductions should be brief should go without saying
lol... "You jump too fast". 😂
I think she did a great job moderating the table
@@romarina2687 I’m still on the fence if I like how she handled it.
"We are the beneficiaries of also a lot of luck, as well as hard work and perhaps a tiny bit of talent." That humility hit me differently.
Yes and it is true, in my opinion.
I worry about the self awareness of anyone who calls themselves “100% rational”.
Especially when humans have been proving not to be rational
He was making a joke that being irrational is sometimes also being rational
I don’t think he was being serious especially as his topic, but he also is in chemistry!
these people make up in their innovation for what they lack in their self awareness
It's a language barrier he just said “100% rational“ as that is the first thing to come to his mind I do it as well when I try to speak english. He is also probably way more rational and intelligent then you will ever be so maybe you should not criticize him about this. They are also nobel prize winners and you are someone commenting on youtube.
The Rick and Morty fan meetup looked fun
Lol🤣
Lmao🤣🤣
1k next
YOU JUSS HAD TOO
Nice
Finally got this suggestion, I think my feed is on the right track.
I was watching a review about interstellar movie, and this suggestion popped up.
Literally my reaction!
me 2 lol
Finally the men of culture are back on the right track!
I was thinking the exact same thing. Watched the whole thing.
It was sort of gratifying to hear how the one Nobel laureate went after love, flunked MIT, and still achieved this great thing…
40:00 the irony... so many cuts in this conversation. They should be releasing the full video.
Editors: "oh yea cuts u say, say no more fam"
100% every time the conversation went down an interesting path it cut.
I once met a Nobel, Albert Fert. He asked me what I studied, I said: "Aerospace Engineering", he was not impressed. A charmful experience.
I don't think a nobel prize can be impressed easily at all, you would need to be a pioneer in your field to actually impress him
What did you learned from that experience?
Why do you think he was not impressed by Aerospace Engineering?
It shouldnt be important for you to impress him.
he was right
"If you write a novel and it´s read by a hundred readers, you´re really writing a hundred novels" - beautifully put! 27:28
I think Tarkovsky said something like this before.
@@AkashMishra-ro2kh Yes he did
Am I stupid or it's actually just 1 novel?
@@laughingbat1695 lol you're absolutely right ...he just finessed the crowd and they don't even know it
@@laughingbat1695 Yeah it's just one novel read by hundred of readers lol
There’s so much respect towards writer Kazuo Ishiguro from the scientists that you rarely see in the real world. I hope one day liberal-fine arts can co-exist peacefully with STEM, instead of people arguing about which one’s more difficult or which one’s more profound. It’s clear that fine-arts has a gift of “nudging” society that through films and music, and vice versa. Interstellar is a great example of that. Kip Thorne and Ishiguro should work on a film together. Would love to see that.
22:33 the fact that this is such a common, profound narrative, even in the realms of scientists (as rational and objective as it gets) is nothing less than beautiful. Granting people the opportunity to follow what they love and support them in that is invaluable
Wow, amazing line right there!
Despite the host trying to interrupt every 5 seconds
the host is perfect if you think what she does is interruption you are false@@hehsuess5431
Its so satisfying to see, how they don't interrupt each other. Its such harmonious conversation.
That shows, how smart people have a conversation. Compare this to politics.
Its not about them being smart, its them just being old and having no energy to argue. Throw in young scientists and you'd have heated debates. This looks more like a retired chess club.
@@ludwigvonn9889 Could it be that the energy that they don't have anymore is ego? Because at that age, you're not as needy as before of attention, communicating your thoughts, or being understood. Am I right?
@@ohnsonposhka9891 Possibly, that's also what I think.
@@ohnsonposhka9891 Conversely ones ego becomes more entrenched and it becomes more difficult to admit fault or mistake when you have the power of experience on your side
what or how would they be interrupting eachother? each one of of them is the top specialist in their studies, you don't even need to be that smart to recognise it would be stupid to not let the true expert talk
They should gather the nobels in a room with a hidden camera, n see what will they talked about
That would be super fun, but what would be the explanation to taking them into a room?, I think they will suspect something. :D
@@julesquintero1435 Waiting room before this event
I would imagine nobel laureates would be able to have an interesting conversation in front of a camera without it having to be in a room with a hidden camera...
@@maz4998 Yeah but aren't you curious to know what they'll choose to talk about
If they were acquainted before? Gossip. It was studied before, most human communication is gossip of sorts. Evolutionary rewarding behavior. Tells you who to trust etc.
I’ve watched every year’s nobel minds but most people agree the 2017 conversation is the most interesting authentic, insightful.
This conversation is way too short. Love to hear these people talk. There's so much potential for great discussion and dumbed down insight for all of us but no time to go there. Imagine if you could let these people talk for a couple of hours. Would be priceless.
There is a reason for that. Our political leaders can't let smart people talk about anything.
The host here did an amazing job considering that she had to interact with 11 super nerdy geniuses who are leaders in specific fields. Imagine the amount of research she had to do to understand what each of these guys had been awarded for. She needed to know all that in order to ask relevant questions and contribute in the conversation as well! At the same time she had to know how to regulate the conversation so that everyone gets a chance to speak in the short amount of time. Some of them are clearly not very social and some are taking too long to answer. Plus she had put up with the interruptions and still stay calm and try to keep the whole conversation flowing and entertaining to watch. She is brilliant and she deserves to be appreciated more!
I would give this a thousand likes. People criticizing her have never themselves held a meeting to know how much behind-the-scenes work is needed.
100% agree
You are truly a reasonable man.
Absolutely ❤
This could have been great. If it had been a conversation instead of an inane attempt to interview so many people at once.
Better moderators would have been Larry King, Dave Rubin, Bret Weinstein, Physics Girl, Michael Stevens, Up and Atom, any of the people from Eons, me, ... I can keep going...
Here's a journalist who's Swedish, who's an amazing listener, and who wouldn't have kicked off like a gossip columnist: Paul Widen. Next year, maybe...
"dave rubin" mmkay
This comment makes no sense, she is a very capable host who has clearly done background study on about 5 different new concepts in new subjects
exactly, they all looked like people waiting for their turn in an oral test
40:34 ironically it is exactly what has happened to this video. This whole discussion has been chopped down because the media thinks "the consumer has low attention span". I would love to spend hours learning with this discussion but sadly has been chopped down. I think I'm not alone in this topic.
Actually right, lol.
Facts the longer I was into the video the more i wished the duration of the video was longer ... 😭
just observe the amount of humbleness in these giants. It's insane man!!
It's a real shame that a conversation between some of the world's greatest minds would receive only 7000 views, while a video of two people fighting in a shopping mall can get tens of millions.
Which is why we can easily name people famous for being famous but will have difficulty remembering the names of these scientists. Very sad, really.
I knoooow, like everyone can identify Kim Kardashian but not Nikola Tesla
Because its easy to watch something entertaining than putting your mind to work, its not really that surprising. People dont like effort.
do you have a link?
This number just confirms the pattern.
Next time consider giving laureates to chance ask the questions.
That would lead to much better questions, much better answers and overall mich more profound discussion
coastalBrake i say next time make this an hour and a half to 2 hours so we can get the most out of every brilliant mind here
The expression "Sleeping like a baby" is actually referring to having no worries in the world when you sleep not the quality of said sleep.
Great observation 💯
Wouldn’t having no worries in the world also equate to good quality sleep?
Jeffrey Hall's demeanor is like a poker player in WSOP, so chill and laid back, really curious on his perspective in life after all of his accomplishments.
The Hollywood Reporter has the roundtable full with actors, directors, etc. Those were entertaining. But Nobel Prize has a roundtable with Nobel Laureates? Beyond amazing. I hope this continues in perpetuity.
I don't understand why they can't get hosts that match the level of the people gathered around the table .
Perpetuity? Wow - you should be on the table with these guys with a vocabulary like that.
@@Zaaaaak.bgd1 I think she was fine.
She is a BBC senior interviewer.
"you jumped too fast, don't do that"
That was priceless. He's the intellectual and she's the representative of regular people.
@@Pratikmayekar4 facts
Little bit rude tho
Regular people think he’s being rude but not that’s another trait of high intelligent people , they not rude on purpose they’re just express their uniqueness !
Amazing one😅💝
I have a feeling they all had the actual round table after this event wrapped up, where no one would interrupt them.
The world needs more round tables like this, for inspiration and insight alone. Thank you!!
22:39 - 23:38 -- This statement said by Rainer Weiss got me at the heart.
His small speech on dedicating your life to something shouldn't be for an award or recognition, but for the sheer pleasure of working on it or better yet "having fun with it". Although not important, the recognition follows later for others that see your vision as you saw it when you first started working on your pursuit.
It's almost as if it came out of a movie script about brilliant intellectuals coinciding their ideas. EXCEPT IT'S REAL!
@Peaches Peaches You mistook the entire context of his small input.
This is for the pure pleasure of future intellectuals in the modern world -- not the barbarians that spouted "Heresy!" against unpopular opinions.
Society has changed from the 15th century...
I think ,he means choose a field that one likes rather than choosing for monetary or external factors.
That little statement was almost ruined by the host.
Yes! And this bitch tries to cut him off!!! Like wtf?? Poor rainer
The audience had to clap🎤
I feel bad for the host. There is simply too much content to touch upon in such a limited stretch of time. She is already doing a good job pacing the conversation, but it’s simply impossible not to cut out anything important. This should go on forever.
VERY TRUE! I hope members do understand how difficult it is to pull something like this off.
when those man start taking notes , you know that there is something useful in their conversation
Please make these conversations longer perhaps 3 hours, tackle societal issues in context with the present and the future. Let's hear sector recommendations from the great minds with reference to their specific fields.
11:07 She received a harsh correction from this brilliant man. "It is better to be quick to listen and slow to speak."
She tried to make a joke, didn’t work out well lol. Brutal
@@ImCallingFromSpringfield lol yeah. She does seem like a brilliant woman but she needs to realise no one is there for her. No one is listening for her. We want to here the conversation between the Nobel Prize winners, she needed to take less control and let the conversation flow for itself. Not that I don’t appreciate her efforts but she really missed the mark in my opinion.
@@alfredwilson1795 exactly
@@alfredwilson1795 she tried but i dont think she'll do it again
She is doing just fine... Did you understand 10% of thier conversation.
This feels like a huge missed opportunity. The editing and watering down of these great minds simply because they want the program to be 45 minutes and possibly out of fear of actually letting a discussion go forward unhindered, To me it feels like an insult to the audiences intelligence. I would love to see something like this that was more free form and completely uneditited.
32:33 I can imagine him having wanted to be a writer when young. Love all he utters.
OMG. Kazuo Ishiguro's face when she said, " I hope you all enjoyed it!" in the end. The irony!!! :-D when he's actually talking about media putting too much emphasis on entertainment. Man!!!....i cracked up so bad. Also That comment, "So you want kids to become gamblers?" The difference between a noble prize winner and a common person - jumping into conclusions.
I would've watched this for 6 hours if not more
ikr fastest 43 minutes of my life watching this video
Sam Torres sane here
True
why are there so many cuts and edit-out sections? I got the feeling that many of the laureates didn't finish their ideas. A discussion of this level must have a higher time limit, you can't expect them to deliver short answers. Big minds answer big questions and when they do, you can't expect the answers to be small.
yeah seriously. It's like they tried to cut it into a meeting of clickbait titles
I just don't understand why people dislike such a great video.
The way She makes her credentials function well in front of Eleven Laureates Is startling!
What surprises me most was the amount of energy and comments by noticing the faults, and propelling on the idea of certain imperfection of this session over the profound topics and great minds exchanging within this short 45 mins talk. I would say, if you agree the topics heard are of significance and most of you agree, no doubt, then let's do something about it.
In order to contribute constructively to the conversation, I'd like to encourage the following discussion:
1. How might we teach maths in an interesting and applicable way? (10.33 to 11.18)
2. Expect failure 99%, you can only pursue something if you are truly having fun. And with luck, that 1% you might succeed. In spite of its treacherous journey, the joy of doing, the joy of pushing further, the joy of exploration is what needs to be understood, for all fields and of life. (20.07- 23.32)
3. The importance of writing (for scientist and beyond) even if you aren't in the Arts (29.25)
4. With the new discovery, science breakthrough and thought-provoking work, how can our society benefits from it? (25.40)
5. The necessary education of science, how to go about teaching these topics, how best to expose kids and the general public the importance of science and math, and having higher literacy and comprehension of the subject. (35.25 to 39.11, 40.19 to 41.14 )
6. "We have forums but media chop everything in the piece, people are incapable of getting coherence stories". 39.48
7. Journalism is broken. People care more about eyeballs and click rates over the accuracy of information - (41.33)
No doubt there might be negative feedback or voices of opposition, we are all entitled to our own opinions, if we spent our time listening to this, over something else we could have done, then it would be a dis-service to ourselves not to talk about some of the ideas and thoughts within this video. Here or somewhere else, or even just a dialogue within yourself.
1. I believe gamification can be a first step.
4. I believe that entrepreneurs and governments will always benefit from the discoveries. Because at the end of the day, they create the products that end up reaching the broader society.
5. Make it cool. This will take some work, but someone has to do it. There's a reason why topics like global warming and other related topics don't get "hype", for lack of a better word. The reason in my opinion is that; the scientists that present these discoveries and "warnings" fail to deliver the message in a fun, less monotonous way...
Well put Cat. Thanks for your input.
My question is: if black holes are holes *in* space-time, and the collision between two black holes *created* space-time, what were the holes "in" before the existence of space-time itself?
@@FunwithCFS daym
Love u to the moon
All so calm and soft spoken. You can just hear the wisdom when they speak.
8 min through , and I still don't see how mind blowing this session is gonna be
If it could go for forever and forever. This conversation is like symphony to me.
For every Nobel prize there is an assistant that done half the work. But much respect.
he is literature Nobel laureate, he will obviously sound more sophisticated, doesn't mean he is more insightful. the physicist seating there are probably the most insightful. infant the one guy who couldn't speak English is probably the smartest. dont confuse English language with genius.
Isnt it interesting that intelligent people actually listen to one another without interupting. Maybe we could learn from this example...probably not tho
I guess that “not though” was for the host 😂
Proly not
When I see Kip Throne, my eyes burst into years. I love you from the bottom of my heart, Kip. I wish more prosperities for you Kip.
Just getting addicted to the show now after watching 2020 & 2017. I'm gonna watch all of them i find.
This guy @3:14 helped make Nolan's interstellar so perfect. They named the AI bot Kipp after him. The movie was inspired by his book by the same name.
I knew he looked familiar. I googled him after I heard some famous physicist who was a friend of Stephen Hawkings made the blackhole look more real.
The movie was not inspired by his book. He wrote a book after the movie explaining the science of the movie as he also executively produced and helped in the scripting process.
@@SwafwanKoroth then why did they pay him tons...!!!!
We are physicist who work in biology to get Nobel in chimestry......well sounds interesting.
Bruh i swear thisll be how it goes for me xD
Who says this and when?
If you know physics you know chemistry if you know chemistry you know biology
+Ahmad Tariq Not true. If you know chemistry, you do NOT know biology.
That's why we study the conclusions of interactive science as applied P,C,B,M .....
I honestly wish this went for hours and hours. I love hearing their ideas in highly specific sciences.
One of the coolest discussion ever seen.
22:25 absolutely golden. Rainer Weiss basically trying to say: "You, stop twisting words and listen"
where was she twisting words? to my understanding, it seemed like she was gonna say that they accomplished so much despite having a learning disorder and how inspiring that is. i think that if the guy didn’t cut her off, she would have made a very good point but maybe you heard something else?
@@suirp6175 exactly. I wasn't too fond of his aproach.
@@suirp6175 True
@@_all_around_us We do not care, she had a good message and wasn't twisting anything.
@@suirp6175 fr bro i was waiting to hear what she was going to finish up with, the guys approach was wrong he tells her to shush but when she says something he says be quiet listen hes doing the same thing back to her..
I'm lucky enough to have met Rainer Weiss in person. Very kind intelligent man.
This in a long form discussion would be some of the most influential material ever produced, such a shame they limit the conversation so much
Quality education, Ethnic Business Model, Accurate Storytelling, Acceptance of failure rate and loving your craftsmanship. Wonderful takeaway from the dedicated well seasoned certified learners.
this is a perfect discussion, but the profesor right the lady looks unhappy at the end of the talk. i think the host should not ignore his emotion ,and let they say what they realy want to say, not to interrupt the conversation. it is the basic respect to these science gaint.
Just let this table of brilliant men have a conversation with each other... the moment a topic gains momentum the moderator throws it off completely
It was honestly infuriating, she would not let a single idea run its course and it was obvious that the men did indeed want to run with certain if not all the conversations that were presented. I understand that time is of the essence but one thought that has been explored in great detail is better than ten thoughts merely introduced but not allowed to be explored to their metaphysical fruition.
YEESS GOD! Annoys me so much
@@daviddan1379 because there wasn’t enough time and she wanted everyone to talk about their own areas of expertise
@@daviddan1379 she was doing her job correctly.
Whole video is wonderful. The insights and Q&As are absolutely amazing. Minute 22 stood out to me. Rosbash and Weiss passionately present the key to it all; love for the work itself, independent of awards and recognition... Hell Yes
This should be a series ❤️ such great insights into what humanity is doing apart from wasting time partying.
This lady would be a great reality show host or other popular thing on tv. But sure as hell not fit to host a conversation between some of the smartest people in the world.
Vincent Von Boff very true, the whole point of the talk is to see how these great minds interact and she keeps trying to push in her personal opinions. Which wouldn’t be bad in normal circumstances but this talk is not about her opinion. That’s my opinion 😂
Most of the fields present here (physics, chemistry, med & physiology, economical science) are related and require decent knowledge on math (e.g. calculus, statistics or computational). There should be a host to make sure no-one is left behind (e.g. literature) and the show doesn't go to much in technical jargon.
what could she have done to make it better
But her research abt the people was great..
@@ooker777 exactly what I felt. Kazuo Ishiguro, though being a man with brilliant ideas and expressions, could not quite get into the conversation.
Interviewer did a great job with the time she was allotted and the job she was given. Being able to have that many people contribute in 40 minutes substantively to a range of topics in keeping with their differing areas of expertise was well achieved. She did cut the literature laureate off twice that I noticed. However she circled back and allowed him continue to speak to the topic under discussion. The second time was to end the program. I did hear her cutoff one other person to her right and was trying to clarify the point of her question that the laureate lost his cool and took exception to. That's a reflection on him not her. She finally caught on that there was no point in clarifying let him finish and had the good sense to take his outburst gracefully and move on. There was another gentleman to her left whom she brought into the conversation on literature and writing who obviously found being asked a question about that interesting but had the good graces to smile acknowledge why she was doing that, but also responded to the question gracefully. She did a great job! She gave everyone an opportunity to contribute despite the number of people and time constraints. She also raised interesting topics in which to engage these disparate disciplines sitting at the same table (5 disciplines).
She did a great job hosting and i could just listen to what everyone have to say for hours on end
.... can't these be series where we hear every Nobel prize winner alive, discussing about their field,life and such with each other and explain about them
CZcams suggested this to me in 2020 and I can't stop watching. Can't believe I missed it for this long.
Just make it in "a group discussion on a specific broad topic" format. No need of a host, these people know how to keep the discussion civilized.
@@wiltedwillowartanddecor5174 no you can see the respect from these guys. They are not just someone with a PhD these are some of the smartest in the world
I can’t believe that THESE MINDS weren’t giver the freedom to have an open conversation.
Having such great minds together on a table and openly conversing should be open to the public more often!
I have the same opinion about the open conversation format.
This should have been longer
This conversation deserves more than 40 minutes, at least 2 hours to be satisfied.
In my sophomore year of high school (last year), my Algebra 2 Accelerated class did a unit on probability and actually focused a lot on gambling. We even had a partner project in which we made games and calculated all their statistical aspects. At the very end of the unit was "Casino Day" where everyone had the same amount of tickets, set up their games and played each others. I was astounded by the results. So appreciative of teachers like mine who always went the extra mile in his teaching.
Damn, whenever I see kip Thorne I just feel that lucky I am to live at the same time with Kip Thorne. One of the greatest scientists ever.
I need a full season of this
This could have potentially been one of the greatest interviews/conversations, ever. I really don't understand why they have chosen this lady as a host. She might be perfect for news interviews with politicians where you don't allow the speaker to talk a lot. But here, this is definitely not the case. We should let these people to talk and teach as much as possible.
I am sorry but the host killed this reunion. Please make another reunion without a disrupting host every minute.
Such a marvel watching these brilliant people exchange ideas. Props to the interviewer for doing such a great job.
We need more of these discussions
To be fair to that lady, it's always going to be a challenge to moderate a session with 12 nobel laureates, and somehow try to keep it within 1 hr mark. Having said that, the discussion here would indeed have been lot more fruitful and enjoyable without a moderator.
Suggestion for the future: Have three such discussions of about 4 nobel laureates from different fields in each group. Those would be a wonderful discussions to watch.
I want more! Def not enough time for these great minds to express fully their thoughts in one hour.
It's wonderful to see a group of old people speak with so much young energy. The way in which every word is deliberately thought out and presented doesn't at all hinder the clearly endless passion they have for their respective subjects.
Not surprisingly, while all are certainly knowledgeable and geniuses in their respective field, the Literature laureate stands out as the most insightful and enlightened. The power of the arts.
their grey hair is brighter than my future...
What is with Zeinab Badawi continually interrupting? She talks way too much.
coastalBrake I can see your point of view. She had a time constraint. I say next time make this an hour and a half to 2 hours so we can get the most out of every brilliant mind here.
@@changedname_8970 her role, otherwise she wouldn't be there
That is her job. Everyone must have the chance to speak, 45 mins is not enough to dig those brilliant minds
Truly inspirational, One such moment I want to share.
When this chemistry teacher mr walter white won a nobal price he put it beautifully, he said and I quote "I liked it I was good at it, I felt alive" ❤️
Anyone catch Kip Thorne as one of the minds that helped give us the spectacular images from Interstellar. A great man indeed!
This was an insult to the nobel laureates. What a wasted opportunity.
As painful as it is to say it , i agree. These dudes deserve one 30 min episode dedicated to themselves individually. Not a table round cluster fuck of an mtv paparazi interview. I felt like i was watching an episode of always sunny(ya know,because someone's always interrupting someone else)
By researching the nobel prize winners, and asking them specific things about their career and influence, the host navigated the conversation in a really equally distributed way.
If there were no host, the most extroverted people in the group would talk most of the time, leaving a lot of very insightful introverts out of the conversation.
Thoroughly enjoyed the conversations, appalled at the comments below which would rather focus on the host only, who has facilitated Nobel Minds prior to 2017. Try hosting 1 Nobel Laureate by yourself, let alone juggle 11 Laureates, and bring out their sense of humor while at it.
yeah, I don't know what people are talking about. She did a great job
I think it's mostly that the format is harsh and so is the time constraint. Would love to see a longer format where the laureates can converse with each other more and topics are explored more thoroughly. She definitely has a very tough job.
easy where do i sign up
Btw It's the many people behind the screen who get these genuis together. Not the reporter
I have no idea what these geniuses are talking about but I can’t stop watching cos I feel so smart
I feel not so lol
We need the raw footage of this talk. Stop cutting out what these scientists have to say. They deserve the right to articulate their thoughts. Less focus on the host.
ikr. the thing is, if they just let these people talk on their own, they'll actually do it properly, let everyone speak, respect each other, conjure up ideas, discuss in justice basically. the question really is, do a buttload of geniuses really need a babysitter to handle them? don't you think they have enough wisdom and self-control to manage themselves and each other to talk beneficially with each other.
Professor Weiss laying it down @ 23:12 -- thank THE GODS. Honestly, who does this lady think she is?
The program really needs to understand that no ones likes her and needs someone else...
For god's sake , this was an insult
Lol she out here tryin to argue with Nobel laureates
Also he destroyed her throughout. She kept jumping in without thinking
That was a bit much I think. He could've been a bit politer. Having said that however, the host should have been more humble with respect to directing the conversation.
Presenter deserves a Nobel prize too
The modern Round Table. This is absolutely very FASCINATING!
If the host dumbing it down means interesting topics will appeal to more people than a more drawn out discussion, she isn’t really causing any damage
please no host or different host
Stephen Fry please
@@JustinRSoles Hannah Fry*
They didn't listen. I have nothing against her but she didn't deserve to keep on hosting it again in the following years.
A comedian would be great
Stephen Colbert? Nerdy/geeky, polite, witty?
Imagine a live stream of this round table without a host and without a time limit.