Mark Philippoussis V Pete Sampras Australian Open 1996
Vložit
- čas přidán 9. 02. 2017
- During the 1996 Australian Open, 19 year old, Mark Philippoussis walked onto Centre Court in Melbourne with nothing to lose. His opponent was the number one player in the world at the time, Pete Sampras. With skill, power and youth on his side, Mark stamped his name and game onto the world of tennis.
- Sport
Sat front row as an 11 year old and loved every minute of this match...
The kid from Melbourne dethroning the best player on the planet at that time...
Great memories!
I seen Mark practicing in Brisbane in 1999 his forehand was so loud it sounded like thunder going off never seen anyone hit the ball so hard especially just practicing incredible
Mark was the greatest tennis player on that one great day! Most talanted player never to win a Grand Slam??? Hands down! Right up there with Henry Leconte and Marcello Rios.
David Nalbandian has them beat.
David had a winning record against Roger, very few players to do so.
Tomas Berdych could be on that list. One of the cleanest hitters on tour, on both wings. Just didnt have the killer instinct like the modern greats AKA the BIG3
Absolutely, he was unlucky to have been born in the freakish era of Roger, Rafa & Novak.
Berydch, Tsonga and Ferrer would have probably won a few grand slams if you didn't peak at the same time the big 4 were peaking and in every semifinal together.
Quite intriguing at 6:22 is the side by side serve comparison. Sampras is already into a split step by the time Philippoussis is still finishing his service motion through. That Sampras serve is still the greatest motion in tennis history.
If you look at old film of Pancho Gonzales' service motion you can see a striking similarity to Sampras'.
That´s not a split. Sampras lands on his left foot and starts running to the net, the split will come later. The difference I see is also on the right leg kick, Phillipoussis has a bigger one (the one every coach on internet teaches you) and Sampras is almost inexistent. Phillipousis jump (Pete jumps lower) is higher and takes him more into the court than Pete´s. Pete´s motion is 100% efficient. But you are right, by the time Pete gives his first step forward with his right foot, Mark is still landing on his left foot.
It's an interesting tidbit that Sampras's losses in the first three majors of the 1996 season came without breaking serve once. Philippoussis only broke Sampras once, Krajicek did it just twice, but that was enough. Pete was in quite an emotional slump and turmoil at the time, but turned it around like a true champ at the USO and TMC.
Thanks for your comment.
boy Mark was on fire as a 19 year old, dang. It does suck that he had so many injuries
Probably philippoussis best match he played of his career.sometimes the tournament boys would throw sampras a ringer something they would never do to there precious fed boy
Pete's kick serve in this match was amazing. Mark's forehand was also nothing to mess with.
Thanks for your comment.
I'm astounded at the number of times these two players met in grand slams. Sampras beat Philippoussis at Wimbledon and the US Open. Mark had the upper hand over Pete at the Australian Open as well as Roland Garros.
Well technically mark had won set 1 vs Pete at Wimbledon in 1999 6-4 but had to retire due to a freak injury. As Pete said, he was lucky since he was getting his butt whipped
Seeing this brings back memories of a time, when tennis was a game of four distinct surfaces, not the generic sport it now is. Philippoussis was a very good power player, who set a new fastest serve record, and here he put on a great show of his strength.
Did Philipousis hold the record? I know Rusedski had it for 143mph when Philipousis hit one at 142mph, and then 149mph a year later, which was the fastest for quite a few years.
thank you very much. Excellent match in very good quality
+Grant B Thanks for uploading. Exciting play from these all-court players. Tennis was better to watch back then.
I'm glad you enjoyed watching the game. I agree with you. Tennis has certainly changed since I was a younger man. Thanks for taking the time to comment and sorry for the delayed reply.
2 Greek boys....
35:54 for a really great slowmotion of Sampras serve motion.
How could I ever forget this match, I was 16 and dad and his mates dropped acid trips and were falling off there chairs every time the scud hit an ace, hilarious night and got the result
Wow, what an interesting home life you must've had. I can't even imagine something like that with my father. Back then, though, how could anyone not be blown away by the awesome power of the Scud? It was incredible watching him dismantle Pistol Pete but I'm glad you had a good night way back when and I'm glad you enjoyed revisiting that time while watching the video. Thanks for taking the time to comment.
Haha yea it was interesting but fun, dad was a cool guy and loved his sport, I've grown up much the same
@@keithybearman4978 What, stoned?
It's interesting how Sampras could have problems with big servers at times (Krajicek and Stich both had winning head to heads against him)
Ivanisevic also had a number on him early in in his career.
Fast surfaces of the 90s made those kind of players very, very dangerous.
Most players had problems with those guys on the fast courts back then :)
Because he wasn't a good returner.
But they are only two who a had winning record against him
You hardly ever saw Sampras being outplayed like this in his career.
Yeah and in spite of the excuses that were made regarding the reasons for his defeat, (like emotional problems, life was difficult at the time, he was surrounded by thousands of Australian fans on an Australian court, etc, etc. etc,) still the number one player in the world got smashed and it was achieved by a nineteen year old with exceptional power, skills and talent. High kudos to a Scud that blew a Pistol off the court.
Sort of true. However, there was Hewitt and Saffin in the finals of the US open. They crushed him badly. And Sampras redoubled his efforts the following year and beat Agassi.
64 76 76 it is not outplayed.he was outplayed from Hewitt and Safin.
He did get outplayed twice in 1996 in similar fashion, this one and then Krajicek at Wimbledon. Very rare outside clay if he was playing well, but to their credit, both Flips and Krajicek played unbelievable.
Mark hizo historia en ese Australian open, derrumbando al numero 1 de la época, continuo jugando al máximo nivel, pudo ganar varios GS, tenia excelente juego y golpeaba muy fuerte
That was a very impressive win. And in the very next round Philippoussis got completely dismantled by Mark Friggin' Woodforde of all people. Unbelievable. I was so excited to see him against Becker but Woodforde had a different idea.
I really thought Mark was going to win at least one major in his career.
amazing pete can return such speedy first serves with such beautiful single backhand
Mark has a Beautiful service motion!
La primera vez que escuche el nombre de Phillipoussis, su juego simplemente sensacional, gran atleta
Do you have any of Scud's Wimbledon classics, by the way? (I presume the deleted video was one.) CZcams doesn't allow Wimbledon matches, of course, but if you would like, I can suggest a safe video hosting site to put that up. Would like to see more of Philippoussis on grass before I might resort to buying some matches.
Hi Aetherwave, all the games I have were uploaded to my channel back at the start and I have no others. Yes the deleted video was Philippoussis V Agassi. It was Wimbledon that cried foul and had it taken down, CZcams simply complied. I would love to take a look at the site you're referring to if there are Philippoussis games to see. By the way, thanks for watching and commenting on numerous occasions; it's appreciated.
Aetherwave - Hi Mate, thanks for all the effort. I'll check them out over time and see what I think. Grant B.
You can get full wimbledon matches now on CZcams wimbledon uploaded 2008 final..
John Alexander such a perfect commentator, strong male voice but very calm which is needed when watching tennis, you are concentrating and you dont want too much loud outburst. Sometimes its appropriate but John Alexander is right up there alongside Jason Goodall as best commentators in tennis.
Rob Koenig is the best
@MUFC what the hell is soccer? Soccer is not the world game thats nonsenae. Everyone knows Football is the world game or for official name of Association Football is the world game! Only golf and tennis can rival it is international world game but football is a lot easier than Tennis and even a leasier than golf
@MUFC possibly it wont be the biggest sport because yanks arent that good at it. Whereas no one plays gridiron so its easy for them to be the best. Yanks are obbsessed with being loud and saying they are the best and thats just not ever possible in football if thats the sport you are talking about. Do you even know where Europe is on the map? Ill give you a hint because i know it will be hard, its in the northern hemisphere. Perhaps you have no idea what a hemisphere is, i dont blame you of course its the sdhool system in the United States
@@TheColourwonders exactly. Id ont know what this MUFC manchester united fan is smoking but i think he ended up on the wron video with his comments.
What i like about tennis vs football is that there isnt any corruption in tennis. Also no one fakes injuries and broken bones in tennis and no one rolls around the floor during tennis matches and if they do they arent faking injuries.
Tennis is the more sophisticated intelligent crowd whereas football is a simple sport for working class. And thats what makes both sports do wonderful. Sometimes you just wqnt straightforward football and other times you want a deep complicated clean no cheating sport like tennis.
Outstanding performance by the young Australian player who will be strangely kicked out of the tournament on the next round... Huge deceit for Pete who won the previous 2 majors titles and was attempting a third one in a row...
Australia vs U.S or in Another Point of You Greece v.s Greece
Absolutely, Elias, we can't deny bloodlines. Thanks for your comment.
They look very Greek
Sleeping Lion They both are
Mark’s mother is Italian
@@concrete7830 From North Italy or from South? because is she's southern..you know..😊
Mark won on 3 Big Stages against Pete🎾🎾He took care of Pete in the French Open 😆😆Sampras gave him the same mean handshake he gave Rafter when Rafter beat him in the USopen 😆😆😆🎾🎾🎾🎾
There were only two players that could hurt Pete in this particular way back then but they had to be completely on. Phillipousis and Kraijcek, but I think in particular Phillipousis because of the massive weaponry and power.
Yeah, Pete certainly didn't enjoy the big servers and power hitters even when he was at his best. He may have beaten them at times but he didn't like playing them at all. Mark at his best was exceptional and could beat anyone on a good day.
Philippossis in skort, Sampras in pyjama
Your girl in dirty pomp pomp
Philippoussis c'était juste de l'inconstance , il n'a jamais gagné de tournois majeur de sa courte carrière. Pete Sampras n'a pas été chercher cette victoire. La différence entre lui, Rafter , Philippoussis et Krajchek : 14 titres du grand Slam et 5 masters !
love the sampras serve. love the philippoussis serve.
StreamingEagle They are 2 of the best 3-4 serves ever.. The Sampras one in first place including also the second serve.
It's incomprehensible that Philippoussis never won a major.
Hi Mathew, Mark certainly had the game, the skills and the ability but I think living the good life sometimes got in the way of the training and the focus. Twice he came close and deserved to be in the final but unfortunately a win eluded him.
Mathew Aconley He came close twice, possibly nerves or his erratic style at times, but he never closed the deal. Both finals exposed his major weakness, which is common among big guys: limited movement
Mathew Aconley Loads of talent but very lazy.
Too slow
It was a shame he went down with a knee injury against Sampras during the 99 wimbledon he was a set up and looking good ofcourse sampras went on to win that year..
The 2 greatest Aussie commentators. They punish us nowadays with Jim Courier and Tracy Austin Hahaha but Courier is established now, i wonder how long he will do it.
Gosh even back the they punished us with as many ads as posssible, first game finished after only 1 minute. I cant watch tennis with ads and all grand slam rights are with home nation broadcasters who adore ads. Why cant we just pay $15 for the right to watch the tournant without ads.
Philippoussis makes me think of the lead singer from the Thompson Twins band - singing the song "Lay your hands on me" lol 🤣 The passion, verve and determination he showed against Sampras reminds me a lot of said qualities being used to great effect by the lead singer shouting "lay your hands on me!" repeatedly in a TV show called Razzmatazz (which used to air in the 1980s) 😊
Good day, I'm sorry if I bother you, thank you very much for the very beautiful sports videos on your beautiful youtube account. Please don't you also have some tennis matches, I will be very happy for everything that can be seen. I'm keeping my fingers crossed for you and I wish you the best of health. Best regards, Dominik from the Czech Republic :)
The scud Missiles vs the pistol
Cool Sunnies and thanks for your comments.
6:22. Pete gives his first step forward with his right foot while Mark is still landing on his left foot. Right leg kick: Phillipoussis has a bigger one (the one every coach on internet teaches you) and Sampras is almost inexistent. Phillipousis jump (Pete jumps lower) is higher and takes him more into the court than Pete´s. Pete´s elbow is another hinge in the motion. Mark doesn´t use his elbow as a hinge as much. Pete´s motion is 100% efficient. It´s clear that Marks spends more energy in his serve motion.
Both of them landed on their left foot after the serve. It was much more pronounced with Philipousis than Sampras.
@@th8257 Exactly. Nobody serves like Pete these days, but everyone serves like Philippoussis.
They are both greek descent??right?
Peloponnesian War 2: Electric Boogaloo.
yep
And what of it?
It really hard to comprehend how did Pete loss here and in Wimbledon against Krajchek,he hadn’t any health issues as he had in 1999,was clearly a better player,but he was a true champion and always had his way to come back stronger,as he did in 1996 and 2002 US Opens,still think if not for thalassemia B he would have won 3-4 Slams more.
Hi Alek, I don't think it is so hard to comprehend. Pete said in those days that he hated playing big servers and power players. All players have their Achilles heel and that was his. Laver, McEnroe, Federer, Nadal - everyone gets beaten and their record is never what they hope it will be. Thanks for taking the time to comment.
Pete was dealing with the illness and consequent passing of his coach/mentor/friend. You could really tell he was struggling with it at times. But Philippoussis was also an incredible player, one of the best hard-hitters at the time. No shame he lost here.
The Thalasemia 100% had a very negative impact at Roland Garros because he had to put together two gruelling weeks on clay
. People don’t really know that Pete was actually a very good clay court player , he beat every single French Open winner of that era on clay , including his rival Agassi which he has a winning career head to head on clay .
Problem was he just couldn’t do it for 2 weeks but not because of what many many think, was 100% a endurance issue . Being the champion that he was he never ever admitted to having the disease until after he retired .
Different era, both Scud and Krajicek were far superior to any of the dark horses you have today because their style of game could work with the balls and surfaces around.
Sampras was a brilliant player (the best I have ever seen) but tennis was nowhere close to the same professional week in week out grind. By consequence it was also a lot more fun to watch back then. More names, more surprises.
I agree with you Meshel. Thanks for your comment.
A lesson on how to bludgeon the ball! These guys were animals.
They were much stronger back then, now the raquet technology and string technology is too advanced. Skinny guys like Djockovic and Kyrgios can produce power. Remarkable
@@Creees Phillipoussis was almost exactly like Fernando González, Soderling, Blake, power hitters. They also didn´t won a GS. Djokovic skinny?, really?
@@miguelbarahona6636 would you seriously question Djockovic being skinny? Twig would be a fantastic adjective.
They should run tests.
So much controversary coming from this guy and with his 'medical' issues. I wouldn't be suprised if he tests positive for something
@@miguelbarahona6636 Federer has a great build. Quite ideal
@@Creees Totally. I disagree, Djokovic is perfect for a tennis player. Federer is my favorite, but his arms are skinny. The same doubts you have about Djokovic´s medical issues have been in the air about Nadal, for many years.
Mark was 19 years and 2 months in that time!
How the years fly by. It seems like such a short time ago but then again, I'm waiting for my walker to arrive in the mail. LOL. Thanks for watching and thanks for your comment.
Sampras wearing boxer underwear.
Its interesting to see Nike always had ugly kits.
What happened to Mark in the next round, by the way? He lost very badly to Woodforde (2-6 2-6 2-6). Can't believe that was just nerves - did he get injured or something, do you know?
I did see that game but it was a long time ago so other than the disappointing loss, there's little I remember clearly. I can only tell you what I heard some time later. I don't recall Mark being injured or nervous. To the best of my recollections, at least regarding how the total turn around was explained, as with most countries, the Australians practiced together and knew each other's games very well. Mark was very young and relatively new on the circuit and Woodforde came out that day after being coached to play a very specific style of game. In essence, he completely dismantled Mark's natural game with random shots, consistently chipping and spinning the ball, causing Mark to run and chase for the entire game. The constant changes and adjustments by a more experienced player who knew Mark's game so well, was fundamentally at the heart of the defeat. That was what I heard and so that is the best answer I can offer you. Thanks for watching the video and also for taking the time to comment.
Id also add, that Mark's game was up and down. Mark's tennis, his shots, everything was grooved to work with him hitting all out. When it was a good day he was very tough to beat, but when he was blasting away and the ball wasnt going in, he didnt have a plan B other than to keep going for it and hope to hit his way into form. It was only later that he started to develop some more options, to think a bit deeper, to find comfort in groundstrokes without just swinging all out. Sadly by that time the injuries and wandering focus had started, and Mark never really became the player he could have been, the odd stretch here and there excepted.
I agree. Had Mark's focused mindset in the latter part of his career, been his mindset when he was younger, that is, more training, more effort and more determination, I suspect his career would have been very different. That said, I still think he was an incredible tennis player and at his peak, he was awesome to watch.
Ser Uresto I would have to agree. Mark was a very exciting but highly streaky player to watch. Like most big servers, his game centered around that. Pete had the serve , but also had variety, consistency, and movement. That being said, this was probably Mark's most complete match.
Quite simply the roof was closed for this match making this perfect for Mark. Next round was played under normal conditions and his serve was 50 percent less effective.
surprised mark didnt have a few slams
Philippoussis wearing parachutes for shorts and Sampras wearing his boxers LOL. Epic showdown indeed. 😂
HAHAHA, Spot on.
Some people always like to say that Sampras had the tougher opponents and Federer only had to defeat players like Philippoussis in GS Finals. And what is here? A 19-year-old Philippoussis defeats a Prime Sampras in three sets. Yes, exactly...WEAK ERA MY ASS! :D
Both Sampras and Federer dominated their era .. enough said
Pete went on to win their next 5 of 6 matches. Love Federer, but he doesn’t have the best head2head against his peers. Federer completely dominated from 2004 to 2007.. but his main rivalry was with Andy Roddick. Not exactly the toughest opponent.
Branleur
@@khale4nia Well said sir. With all due to respect to Fed, dominating the Roddick era doesn't exactly make you GOAT material, especially when you're dominated by two players in your own generation.
@@khale4nia He also won vs prime hewitt and murray.and Sampras was not able to win vs prime Hewitt.
peter sampras is wearing the outfit i got to bed in
I would be embarrassed to even put it on me, let alone wearing it in public, let alone spectated by millions…
@@Summon256what do You expect from Sampras, dry, boring and lame, like his personality
Speed gun is wack! There's no way these serves are that slow!
EZ e no way sampras hit a 130 k second serve 😂
@@microddjj And you can be sure of this because?
David Robson any clue about tennis? An average woman could serve that fast... and sampras had by far the best second serve in the game;pace, spin, placement...
totally agree. speed guns in the mid 90s musta been slow cuz pete and mark could consistently hit 130mph serves (210kph) later in their careers, yet nothing like that here. in a match against roddick, both he and sampras were hitting 130+ and roddick is known as one of the hardest servers of all time so we know sampras has it in him. 1:42:56 it's really obvious the gun is broken. that serve is easily 210kph+
@@oldfrend i'm just wondering how fast a 130mph serve with a wooden racquet from Noah in tthe 80's would be with the modern days radar..
And i'm pretty sure that Pete would hit bomb well into 140+
Next round he lost to Mark Woodforde
No point in spoiling it then.
Yes. I am wondering how Mark Woodforde defeated Mark Philippoussis. Mark Woodforde was in good form at Australian Open 1996.
If Mark could hit a clean forehand, he might have been the next gen Boris Becker.
what do you mean?his forehand was more modern and better than Beckers
@@thebigmonstaandy6644 consistency
@@thebigmonstaandy6644 Better than Becker's? You have got to be shitting me. Becker could hit running forehand missiles both cross court and down the line on the dead run at will when he was younger and had not lost his speed. He was the first real big power baseliner all court player with pace and spin.
@@z1az285 If you think so ,you have no idea about tennis.Mark is more modern tennis player : he played with a lot of spin like modern players,during Becker played very flat.and also Becker was not the first modern tennis player : it was Lendl.
@@thebigmonstaandy6644 I do think so and you don't have a clue when you stated Becker hit the ball "flat". He used to hit with heavy topsin when required and his grip was quite modern which allowed him to do so. I said "big power baseliner all court player". Lendl was not a natural volleyer but he improved significantly from 1989 onwards, yes Lendl was the 1st power baseliner but he used to hit the ball flatter than Becker on average. His grip was more conventional, not as extreme as Boris. I have followed Beckers game since 1984, so you are preaching to the choir
Mark should have won the Aussie open then. He was on fire. Shame he could never sustain his form for a long period of time. Constant Injuries didn't help either. Too big of a frame for a tennis player just like del potro. Big big shame.
Crazy how Philippoussis got beaten in straight sets by Mark Woodforde of all people.
@@Romans8-9mark Woodford wasn’t a joke player, very solid and not Someone to be underestimated
@@MrNixity Never said he was but he was hardly renowned for being a top singles player.
@@Romans8-9 yeah but he cracked the top 20 and won some titles. I just don’t find it surprising someone solid and consistent could beat someone like mark who was always pretty inconsistent
@@MrNixity Woodforde barely had a 50% win rate in singles, was in the twilight of his career at this point and this was his best ever Grand slam result in singles with none of his other results coming close. I don't think its a stretch to say this was a surprising result.
Yeah great match..
Mark 💪🦘
Phillopoussis the player who could've been the Federer before Federer...
Hi Atul, I don't doubt Mark could've been more than he was as a tennis player but I think Roger and Mark were two very different tennis players. Thanks for your comment.
no chance. fed's a genius on the court and a flawless hitter. phillipoussis was a raging bull by comparison; all power, no strategy to his game at all. they were nothing alike.
oldfrend : alos his footwork was not so good.
Not a chance
Great match. Pity he didn't achieve much later. 5 years later, another 19 year old will defeat Sampras and next year defeat Mark.P to capture his first slam. Destiny.
"pity he didn't ...", That is because Sampras put him in his place in next meeting and Philippouses never forgot that
@@srees9874 Nah Scud could have won something with a better work ethic and luck with injuries. Sampras would win almost every next big encounter though save the French in 2000.
And this was Sampras close to his best unlike 2001 when Federer beat him.
Kyrios, Philippoussis, Tomic all fall into the category of good talent but weak minds. None of them has showed any capacity of being able to handle pressure. Lleyton Hewitt had lesser talent than all of these three, but far outmatched their achievements.
Philippoussis did win us 2 Davis Cups. Doesn't get any higher pressure than that. True that he didn't reach his potential though.
@@SuperBronaldo plus two slam finals. Interestingly he has beaten Sampras at the Australian and french opens. He won the 1st set vs Pete in 1999 at Wimbledon and frankly dominating Pete when he suffered a freak injury. Really bad luck. He lost a tough 4 setter against him at the USO too
Kyrgios has barely lost a match since your comment
Philippoussis had multiple ACL and other knee surgeries and still had many big Major and Davis Cup runs and performances, nothing like the other 2.
Don't think Mark ever showed a weak mind. He didn't take his training and fitness as seriously as he should have, but I don't remember him ever quitting in a match mentally or coming apart. He was solid and confident on the court.
*
Wow... The clothing now a days has improved so much. Those are some hideous shorts for Sampras. 🙈
i thought they were boxers
You're kidding, right? I think Sampras' style was ultimate cool.
@@danguee1 Hey... It's ok, I think the fashion sense in the 90s was a little crazy, they do look like boxers. 😂.
Welcome to the mid 90s! I'm sure though that people looking back will think today's clothes are hideous too.
@@th8257 maybe, maybe not.... For instance, clothes from the last decade is still fine. Screw all of this, we just corona virus to be over and get back to some tennis.... Long shorts, short shorts, boxer shorts .... Nothing matters now 😂
Pat Cash: "There I am. Big match tonight, mate."
Such an Australian thing to say.
John Alexander went on to be a mediocre politician than he was a commentator. I could have sworn Bruce McAvaney called this match on Australian TV?
Their tennis outfits look funny in the present era..
Haha. If you think their outfits look funny, take a look back at the 1960's and 1970's. The era of short shorts and tight T-shirts. Thanks for your comment Ramy G.
Tennis attire was better in the 90's, especially Agassi's gear.
I wear Pete's exact outfit With I mind you the Air Oscillate shoes and I get nothing but compliments cuz everyone else is wearing bullshit tight Rafa and Novak clothing and they look like crap !
It's what happens. Everything looks funny after a few years. In years to come, people will look back on today's stuff and think it looks funny.
What freaking round is this, Aussie tv sucks
It was the third round of the 1996 Australian Open.
Grant B got it
Sampras was such a sore looser lmao, ofc nobody talked about that cause precious and all mighty USA cant do no wrong, lkke agassi doping in the 90s...
Calm down
How was he a sore loser ?
The way Sampras plays he was lucky he was not in the era of Federer, Nadal and Dojkovic. We would not have seen him win 14 Grand Slams. Amen
How many Mr. Laver?
You could say that for any sport and any era - never bought into that argument at all
He would have destroyed them
@Jamin good joke.
@@anandparmeswaran6681 T'y connais rien ma grande 😂