Hydrogen cars: a greener future for London? - BBC London
Vložit
- čas přidán 29. 08. 2024
- With the capital’s roads regularly clogged with traffic, it’s no surprise that for ten years running our annual pollution limits have been breached within the space of just a few weeks.
The Mayor’s new Ultra-Low Emission Zone launching next month should help, but longer term we may need much greener cars to really make the capital cleaner. BBC Inside Out investigates.
Subscribe to BBC London here: bit.ly/2Gd18gB
Check out BBC London for more: bbc.in/2JssOge
Like us on Facebook: bit.ly/2fz7mZ3
Follow us on Twitter: bit.ly/2DOhFWq
This car is great for Britain. It makes water for cups of tea people! THIS IS THE PINNACLE OF BRITISH CONVENIENCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Store the water, buil a kettle into the car. It'll be the best selling car.
A solution to all of our problems (including Brexit). Bless thy soul!
How much energy does it take to "make" £50 worth of hydrogen? and where does it come from?
Even if there is pollution involved in making it, it's that bit better since at the actual combustion side of things it's totally clean unlike fuel combustion engines that are dirty on both sides of the equation.
This is a preferable solution whilst working on cleaning the fuel production
The people in the comments complain about the new technology would have been the same people that complained about the first cars in favour of horse and cart.
It's a relativity new technology, give it time.
The issue is that it takes more energy to produce the hydrogen, either through seawater distillation or extraction, than you get out of it when burned. Its an issue with chemistry, not technology. The only way you can get more energy out hydrogen then you put in to get it is if you use the hydrogen as fusion fuel. That in itself however is a technology in the works.
Aidan Doherty I’m not sure what the point of hydrogen is. When electric cars had a tiny range and a long charge time, yes. But now that EVs can charge at 150KW it just doesn’t make sense. I believe it’s quite popular in Japan though, so might be missing something.
@@RM-iu6mm Tax and high cost service charges, that's the point of hydrogen vehicles.
Battery cars are cheap to service, hydrogen cars will be very expensive, and they can charge you by the litre.
When you say new technology I suppose around 3 hundred years is new in the whole scheme of things yes, but in the automotive world I don't think that's new, fuel cells have been around longer than petrol or diesel engines.
@@RM-iu6mm I was thinking it could be used for vehicles that have to travel many hundreds of miles for which an electric motor would be inappropriate, such as HGVs, coaches, trains on non-electrified lines and maybe even cargo ships and aeroplanes.
Hydrogen is terribly inefficient. It's not even good in theory. Everything from the process of making it, transporting it and storing it. £50 to fill the tank is atrocious.
it's just that hydrogen had the "Tesla" moment.
Hydrogen can be produced without shelling that much money.
Dan M where have you got ur info
Once the infrastructure is in place it’ll be a better option.
I’ve worked on London’s hydrogen fuel cells buses they’re quite old now
That goes without mentioning that the water vapour emitted is a major factor in the greenhouse effect.
Gotta make this car under £20K
All this can’t happen soon enough... too much time has already been wasted. Good work everyone:)
Would be better for boats, ships and yachts as opposed to cars.
This whole drive for alternatives to ice cars seens a pretty good thing to me. Whilst I try to be as informed as I can be I read so many environmental, technological, infrastructural pros and cons for both li-on (& maybe silicon....) battery & hydrogen technology. The next 5-10-15 years is going to be pretty damn interesting .......
I’ve been hearing about hydrogen cars since 2007 they’ve even got the hydrogen buses I’ve never seen customers use
50 pounds for hydrogen gas though? Water costs next to nothing which hydrogen comes from. Why so expensive?
1) Cost of production; either by steam reforming or electrolysis of water, that takes energy
2)Cost of storage: hydrogen is a very low density gas, so to store it requires a very large amount of pressure, a large container, a strong container to withstand these pressures, and more energy to provide the cooling for the H2 storage
3) Cost of transportation
4) Low volume production: how many people do you know that drive a hydrogen car?
@@riseld4 Sure there are some costs involved in labor and material or what not but not 50 pounds. Sounds like rip off.
£50 to fill a tank and runs out in an hour
And can be used as a bomb
It's not that fast a car - the range is over 300 miles. And with just 11 H stations they can charge pretty much what they want.
@@lorenzom7237 All fuel can be used as a bomb, that's why it works as a fuel. They're inherently energy dense haha. If you look up videos of fuel cell cars in accident tests/ on fire it's interesting to see how they compare with conventional cars
How is Shell producing hydrogen? Usually hydrogen is obtain from natural gas so it has carbon emissions like petrol or diesel.
No hydrogen isn't produced from natural gas. Hydrogen is produced by a process called hydrolysis or water breaking where water is broken into hydrogen and oxygen
@@avaneeshrai9741 Unfortunately it is cheaper to obtain from methane (CH4) aka natural gas. That is the most frequent way to obtain H and Shell is in the methane business, so...
@@avaneeshrai9741 it is also produced from natural gas. Methane. The process you describe is less efficant but using gas is worse for the environment
Infrastructure is a very good point.
In December 2020 Boris Johnson announced that the UK government intends to build 100+ hydrogen stations around the country by 2025.
Is there a news article of that
I'd recommend everyone to watch Real Engineering's video about Hydrogen as fuel. So much misinformation floating around in the comments here.
Well we will have to ban smoking outside too
It doesn't outgas hydrogen. The exhaust is water vapour, H2O
Nonstarter, Hydrogen is good for large transport but for cars is a waste of time! Fuel cells was pushed for years without infastructure! I have an electric car and its great!
The problem is that it's inconvenient and slow to charge. You like it, sure, good for you, sunk cost fallacy, but for the general public, they're reluctant to make that sacrifice.
@@S2Tubes There is no inconvenience, smart phone is never empty neither is the car, I would never go back!.
It depends how far you drive. The same is true of phones, many people need to charge them before the day is out.
Moron, the problem with infrastructure is that Hydrogen cells were NOT subsidised by the government, Plug in was. That's literally it, If neither was subsidised, you'd have nowhere to charge your plug in. You should be lobbying the government to pay for the infrastructure, then EVs become practicalfor everyone, not just people who don't value their time. No way in hell I'd waste any of my short life waiting about for a battery to charge.
@the man with the green cortina Nope. Mine runs on hydro. An EV running on 100% dino juice sourced electricity is still less polluting because they're so much more efficient.
Johnson has since promised another 100+ hydrogen Refill stations by 2025 in the UK.
Massive explosions from crashes?
Battery technology has come so far in the last decade. We've seen the transition from Lead Acid and NiMH batteries to much more energy dense Li-Ion cells. The momentum for getting batteries cheap and widespread is already here. Give them another 10 years and theyll have the ability to recharge just as fast as it takes to fill up a tank, and go twice as far. Lets not bother with hydrogen.
hydrogen is the only right variant for future. No other variant ! But we are developing approach, which is not exact now. There must be 2 waves for hydrogen : 1/BUILD HYDROGEN PRODUCTION FACTORIES ON SITES OF RENEWABLE ENERGY STATIONS. 2/ CARS NEED TO LOAD HYDROGEN BY EXCHANGE WHOLE COMPRESSED HYDROGEN BALLOONS.
We are wrong because we do not firstly build enough hydrogen production factories on sites of renewable energy stations. We are wrong because we are trying to build network of hydrogen loading stations, which are COMPLEX AND EXPENSIVE.
We must change our approach. We should use hydrogen as energy storage method for renewable energy stations first. Then we should load hydrogen for cars by changing whole standard compressed hydrogen gas balloons. So It is very simple and not expensive to make the global net of hydrogen supplying stations. Any normal mini markets can be a hydrogen supplying point by storing standard compressed hydrogen gas balloons. We do not have to use liquid hydrogen, which is difficult to collect. But we can use compressed hydrogen gas, which is not so much different in weight by comparison with liquid hydrogen. Hydrogen is the best solution of energy storage for all energy stations now, for example, for nuclear energy stations, for renewable energy stations. Just install ready hydrogen production modules, and install independent hydrogen fuel cell modules in adjacent areas. Use compressed hydrogen gas at first time instead of liquid hydrogen.
And the last thing to notice is that, hydrogen is not more dangerous than other gases and petrol. Hydrogen has big energy storage capacity, but when burning hydrogen in accidents, IT DOES NOT CREATE ACOUSTIC DESTRUCTING WAVE TO ENVIRONMENTS. It means that hydrogen burning is less destructive than gasoline burning.
Too bad this game (hydrogen) has already been fought and lost, BEV is the winner. There should be a mention of "Sponsored by Toyota", if for nothing more they are the only manufacturer still pushing for this.
What's BEV?
Hyundai already have hydrogen cars and buses too. South Korea is starting to heavily invest into hydrogen infrastructure so I wouldn't say that batteries have won yet. The hydrogen technology is superior.
BEV aren't sustainable in the long term. Hydrogen is.
BEV also aren't scalable for commercial use.
Larry Bundy Jr that's battery electric vehicle.
They charged him 50£ for something he could of gotten for free 🤣
it be like that sometimes
4:44 hmm, I don't like the pay as you go life!
Dear BBC London,
*"Hydrogen level 4 please"* - Thinking of the movie *"Back to the Future 2"* 🚗🚓
Peace! ✌
11 stations!!!! There is about 7000 EV charging locations and you can charge from home. £60k for basically a cleaner prius while the £40k ish tesla model 3 is around the corner. Pretty much every automaker will be making battery electric cars with 200 plus miles and charge times dropping. Hydrogen is a waste of time, energy and money
This is a joke. You can get same range with electric car for 10 quid
It what I have been banging on about for years you only get water out the back
Fast refuelling is the only real advantage of FCEV versus EV , other than that from a determined unit of energy from a source (solar,wind or coal etc ) to the wheels ,a battery EV can run 2.5x the distance compared to a FCEV. For example to produce 4.7Kg of hydrogen required to fill up the Mirai it takes roughly 280Kw that could charge a similary sized and ranged EV multiple times. This is because from the source to the tank FCEV requires more steps with more losses each , just compressing the hydrogen to 700bar takes 13% of the energy and no matter how many improvements the hydrogen creation and distribution chain it has you can't cheat the thermodynamics laws. Also with the price of one hydrogen refuelling station (that has to be installed away from buildings) you could install 500-700 public chargers on the streets that don't require staff and moreover don't explode (like what happened in Norway or U.S.A.) also with fast DC charger nowadays you can charge 180miles in 15minutes , not as fast but bearable.
"Im biased" followed by the price of a full tank explains it all. Money talks...
Better than a hydrogen fuel cell personal vehicle? A hydrogen fuel cell public transport vehicle.
I have been listening to a greener future since the 1980s and as far as I can see is cars with exhaust pipes everywhere... when is this so called green future happening? Isn't time of the essence given the situation we are facing?
It is happening finally, though more slowly in the UK than other parts of Europe of course. The next 2 years particularly will see major manufacturers coming out with new electric models. Forget hydrogen. I don't know when this was filmed but the content is already dated. Battery electric vehicles (BEVs) are winning through. If I had to put my finger on a moment that could be seen as the turning point, it was when everyone realised that Tesla was going to be able to mass-produce the Model 3. Yes, it's still pricey but it's spurred on not only BMW, Mercedes and Audi but has also got Ford and GM scared :-).
@nousernamenow The problem is that the tech (I assume you mean ICE) hasn't actually worked that well - it's the oil that works well. A litre of oil contains roughly 10kWh of energy. Up to now, manufacturers have had no responsibility for fuelling their creations beyond supplying a fuel tank. They've had it very good for a long time. People like to point out that it's difficult to get the same range in an EV as an ICE car or power a home on solar - yes, that's how energy-dense coal and oil are.
I think the key with the uk is going to be some business that installs it's electric chargers in car parks for free. But then people have to pay the charging station to use it.
How much pressure beneath the seat??
So you can't use it when it gets below 0C......
The thing with hydrogen or any alternative fuels is they are not about saving money its about emissions, climate change and reducing our damage to the planet. Its going to cost money but the people with the money don't want an alternative to oil so it won't happen until it has to happen
still why they don.t make hidrogen pomps...?! still very expensive...make them cheapper?!
toyota?
*Next video, Air Cars, cars that suck up the air and make Londoners die and can still make the car drive*
3:25 What is the most dangerous part of the Hydrogen fuel-cell? Did anyone understand what the guy said behind all that music?
"They really went to town on it in making the most inherently dangerous part of the hydrogen fuel cell safe." He was a little too mild-mannered soft-spoken kind so putting that music on wasn't the greatest idea.
i bet they cant wait to slap a tax on them,
I've got no problem with Ferries. Buses, Lorries using hydrogen as the fueling stations can be at the main depot but NOT cars - you need just too many fuel stations which are large and costly compared to electric chargers, also the inefficiencies of this technology are not good!
£50, what a joke !!!!!!
I don't know when this was filmed but the content seems quite dated. Pretty much everyone has now dumped the idea of using hydrogen for cars because it just doesn't work on that scale. It works for trucks, trains, trams, anything large. I think the initial idea with cars was for the oil companies to retain some control over how people get fuel by forcing them back to the pump. Trouble is there are an increasing number of EVs that will do 300 miles or more on a single charge, people can charge those at home and there are rapid charging networks where you can get an 80% in less than half an hour if you're doing a road trip. Also, EVs are getting 140+ mpge versus about 60 mpge for hydrogen. The other problem is creating the hydrogen. Unless it's a by-product of another process or generated using renewable energy, there's no net gain. Anything is better than an ICE (particularly diesel) but hydrogen is going to lose out for cars at least.
Filmed within the last month, so none of the information is outdated. 80% in less than half an hour is still a completely different experience to refuelling a car with hydrogen or petrol. The whole point is this is a longer term goal, with the ideal process being that we use excess energy produced by wind/solar when it's not needed in electrolysers, and then use fuel cells to convert it back into something useful. And as you've pointed out, batteries are unlikely to be useful in larger vehicles. It's worth thinking about these more as proof of concept of commercial fuel cell vehicles than things people are that likely to drive: the future is going to be hybrids and different technology solutions for different problems
@@Gma.parkour Thanks for the update. I think the inclusion of the car threw me a bit and I guess most aren't aware of hydrogen tech which is why it seemed old news to me. I quoted 80% in 30 mins for EV rapid charging because that's the current (ha ha) standard. Version 3 of Tesla's supercharging should give me 200 miles in about 20 minutes though I haven't found charging time an issues at all. I accept this is still proof of concept stuff but maintain it's not suited to cars (like diesel-electric only works on a bigger scale). I suggested hydrogen could only be generated viably using renewable energy but you're right that it must also be excess to requirements. I like the democratisation that fuelling with electricity represents and I think most people can be forgiven for being cynical about anything that takes us back to the pump again :-).
Just don’t make these cars look so unrealistic looking. Keep them modern like cars from nowerdays not from 50 years from now. People are more likely to buy a good looking car than environmentally friendly. Good looks and low emissions go a long way
I was hoping Hydrogen fuelled cars would be more like Manuel transmission cars, sad to hear it still uses an electric motor... would’ve become a game breaker for those of us who loves changing gears and more engaged in driving... I guess Manuel driving will become a forgotten skill in the far future
See Powerhouse plc , hydrogen generated from waste plastic containers etc. Now that is ‘green’.
This might have a place,but what about bio gas this could be a huge business.
Basically it’s about as feasible as the Baker electric that was made over 110 years ago with lead acid batteries. Which even today wouldn’t make a bad city run around.
Hydrogen overall isn’t that much greener than other ‘natural’ fuels. Or we could just dig up the planet looking for lithium.
I’ve worked on fuel cell buses they have their risks.
Just imagine having a filtered tap in a hydrogen fuel caravan. Need some water? Run the engine. I love the concept over regular electric cars.
without a doubt this works, but is it practical?
can't hydrogen gas be delivered in the natural gas infrastructure that exist in most big cities?
With advanced technology can't we make traffic collisions a lot less common.
I think this is pretty exciting
It much better then battary car ,no need to wait forever r charge
As long as I'm not breathing in any more toxic fumes then I don't really care whether you use hydrogen or electricity. Pollution has got to absurd levels in London and the UK and it's damaging my health.
hydrogen cars can really ECONOMISE MORE FUEL COST THAN ELECTRIC CARS IF WE MODIFY OUR CURRENT HYDROGEN DISTRIBUTION APPROACH !
The biggest cause of hydrogen cost is that WE TRANSPORT HYDROGEN BY TRUCKS, IT IS EXPENSIVE. Just try to avoid to transport hydrogen by trucks, then hydrogen will be very cheap. It means that NEED TO PRODUCE HYDROGEN ON SITES (WHERE FILLING HYDROGEN), OR TRANSPORT HYDROGEN BY PIPE LINES.
So we need to make 1 or 4modifications :
1/ Distributed hydrogen production on sites : hydrogen filling stations should be equipped with electrolysers, so hydrogen filling stations can produce hydrogen on sites from electricity outlets, instead of just receiving hydrogen from other places. Thus avoid problem cost of transfer hydrogen by trucks. Besides, nets of electrolysing hydrogen filling stations are ideal markets for intermittent renewable energy.
It is new worldwide coming hydrogen distribution approach, so it opens markets of mobile small sized electrolysers. Electrolysers are not so expensive for hydrogen filling stations.
2/ Use compressed gas hydrogen batteries with mini household electrolysers/mini mobile electrolysers : small mobility vehicles/mobility machines/mobility robots/mobility drones …, will use hydrogen gas batteries (hydrogen gas battery =hydrogen fuel cell + compressed hydrogen gas ballon 200-300 bar). And each of these mobility machines can be sell with mini home electrolysers, so that owners can produce to fill hydrogen at homes (charge hydrogen batteries at home). Hydrogen ballon 300bar is enough, so that hydrogen battery 300bar(fuel cell +hydrogen ballon 300bar) can guarantee more energy capacity than best lithium batteries, and it guarantees that the size of hydrogen battery 300bar is not remarkable bigger than lithium battery of equivalent energy capacity. Of course 700bar allows more hydrogen storages, liquid hydrogen allows more hydrogen storage. But for hydrogen batteries, gas hydrogen ballons 300 bar are enough for balance of performance-capacity-size-energy convertion ratio-ballon material-simplicity.
Hydrogen batteries 300bar + mini mobile electrolysers are ideal for two-wheel vehicles/small cars/small robots/drones and for trend of hydrogen mobility devices anywhere (easy to operate anywhere and easy to charge anywhere with electricity).
3/ hydrogen batteries for big station energy storage : Independent hydrogen batteries (hydrogen fuel cell + compressed hydrogen ballons > 300bar) + independent electrolyser is best variant. when excess energy, then run independent electrolyser. When need electricity, then run independent fuel cell. And intrigued working mechanism between independent fuel cell and independent electrolyser. That is all ! No complex automatic control system.
4/ hydrogen filling stations need to prefer using hydrogen pipe line than transporting hydrogen by trucks.
5/ The fundamental science dictates essential truth advantages of hydrogen.
Science : if a chemical energy storage mechanism is charged as quick as producing hydrogen, then this mechanism PRACTICALLY CANNOT HAVE ENERGY CONVERTION RATIO BETTER THAN ELECTROLYSIS PROCESS. Besides, it is possible to adjust electrolysis reaction speed to get energy convertion ratio of electrolysis better than any chemical batteries. The best one of all possible chemical batteries in earth conditions is HYDROGEN BATTERY. All revolutions of chemical batteries, lithium batteries, LFP batteries, LTO batteries, graphene batteries .. are for reaching to the features of hydrogen batteries
I think hydrogen will win battery enabled cars.
Because battery needs a lot of natural elements like li, mg, cobalt etc.
We need to mine a lot of earth to get rare elements to make batteries for all the cars in the world.
Again batteries are very dangerous for environment if not disposed correctly. Many people will just dump these batteries instead to recycling them.
It will create new havoc
What is wrong with Lpg ?
you burn it releasing emissions into the atmosphere and its a fossil fuel.
With time this will get cheaper. Batteries are not cheap to replace so electric is not the full answer. A method to fill up in 5 mins is good. You can be back on. The road quickly. Makes good sense.
why not just use battery electric cars,they have a good range now.Charge at home and when you are working,fast charging when you go on a longer trip.We have heard about Hydrogen for decades now,electricity is every were much harder to make Hydrogen.
What do you call electric cars that are not Fuel-cell or Hydrogen Cars, I suppose like the ones Tesla produces? Do you call them Plug-In Cars or Electric Battery Cars?
sorry 1 word ....... TESLA
Yeh like we can really afford this car
Everything is expensive initially. If it catches on, the price comes down.
Wow UCL man ignorant of where fuel cells actually came from, first ever fuel cell came from the UK in 1800s.
So not exactly new.
And though a great idea, would be better off used mainly for heavy goods and public transport, not private cars or motorcycles.
Even though they can be used obviously, it doesn't make sense.
Battery tech is good enough for private cars and motorcycles, and completely recyclable.
The only advantage to having hydrogen fuel cell cars is Tax the govt can Tax you on the amount of fuel you use exactly the same as fossil fuel, but struggles to do the same with a battery vehicle.
Oh and those over inflated service charges that will follow with fuel cell tech.
Only toyota think for as in london
Hate to say this but...I hope they have given 2nd thought on potential threat of hydrogen
There is no threat from hydrogen I don't know what you're talking about
@@avaneeshrai9741 in the 50's. It wouldn't take genius to google it
Flammable hydrogen + cigarette lighter = KABOOM
The hydrogens in the tank you mug
Not like petrol, where you can have petrol fights, and smoke all you want.
Enter name if north London is red then do u mean labour
I’m not a sausage u southerner
clap clap
BBC needs to look again as electric packs and hydrogen not as green as people believe
True.
How 'green' do 'people' believed they are? :-) I love EVs and would never go back to an ICE car but I'm not so stupid as to think EVs are green - they're cars. To me, it's more a case of ICE cars just being really bad and EVs are a lot less bad. The batteries last ages and are very upcycle-able and recyclable. Plus car sharing is becoming more popular. But you're right, it's a lot better if people use public transport, cycle or walk.
Tim Tam I drive a 15 year old petrol so I am not green
the man with the green cortina :) Sadly the supermini category were never built with the quality to become classic cars but still going. I lost all the gears on it a few weeks ago. Losing them the wrong side of a hump back bridge was fun :)
For electric car that would cost about £5 to fully charge your car
Looks like an energy company have solved the hydrogen production issues!
I came across some very informative videos on a breakthrough method of making hydrogen VERY efficiently and low cost. They are called H2IL - video channel: (H2 Innovation Lab) or the other way around I think. The tech is interesting and it's got to be what is needed to push the hydrogen future closer. Produces H2 from sea water with a new electrochemical method that succeeds conventional electrolysis. I'm a scientist and believe they have the ultimate solution.
I don't now why CZcams keeps sending me BBC vids but while I am here. Cheers to Tommy.
Electric is way better than this
Utilise nicola Tesla's zero point energy system and problem solved
Electric would be even greener and safer
Never use Shell 🤮🤮🤧
I'm not a fan but they are putting in electric chargers now, so something good!
Something that will come along with hydrogen is the industry that produces it, Australia is looking into using its vast amounts of available solar power to produce hydrogen. It's not as rubbish as you might think! Especially in a country like the uk which has a lot of residents without driveways
👌👌
I like how everyone is conveniently forgetting that the waste product is water: *A Greenhouse Gas!*
what a load of gas
Electricity ⚡️ is free , you can install solar power plants to produce hydrogen
thats not efficient at all, may as well just use solar to charge typical EV batteries. It takes something like 60% of the usable energy of the hydrogen to create it.
sickbailey21 yes but solar electricity can be free.. the thing is we cannot store it when it is needed during evening, so that’s why hydrogen is good and batteries have a negative impact on the enviroment, producing more electricity from solar isn’t. And also electricity from where is produced untill it reaches your batteries will habe to travel km of wires and even from the plug to your battery it’s eficiency is around 86 percent. So it may not be such a difference after all, but what is matter is solar energy is free and unlimited, lithium isn’t and recycling it is also a different issue. Hydrogen is the future it uses 10 percent worth of batteries than a normal medium range electric car
@@alinmustata its a massive difference even if just buying the electricity. But if you would buy solar for hydrogen, it makes no sense to not buy it for electricity too.
As long as you're not driving huge amounts, solar system will be able to pay for itself if using it just for storing electricity.
That 60% loss in efficiency just from creating the hydrogen at home has you beat. You then have to compress it and maybe even keep a backup tank of it at home, this is both expensive and hugely dangerous, this stuff is really explosive. Check out some videos on tanks of hydrogen reacting with air.
Other than the environmental impact of mining for battery materials, there are no other pros to hydrogen. After 10 years out of service all of the materials from an EV battery can be recycled though. Changing them out every 5 years for efficiency reasons (not even required with the quality of the tesla chemistry) becomes much more manageable as the technology is quickly becoming mainstream.
Just go electric
That wont work at all!
Please buy hybrids and EV's 👍
Magagaling ang nakaisip ng idea na yan
/\/\/ adore our old fashioned world,.. .. more primitive transport , .. ///\/\/\/\
If you keep sending hydrogen to it, it will keep generating electricity.
So why not make it feed off the atmosphere around it?
Hydrogen cars are a really, REALLY bad idea. Why? Because they pump water vapour out of their exhaust. Can you imagine thousands of car in London all pumping out water vapour? Humidity would go through the roof and fog would become a major problem on congested roads
why is no one talking about Hydrogen Planes?
its an idea for the future but they would cost an absolute fortune to operate at the moment. They would also be creating a huge about of carbon emissions doing this for the energy to create and store the hydrogen under pressure.
If we see some radical advances in battery technology then we will probably see electric jets become mainstream before a hydrogen one.
@@sickbailey21 not sure if you know what you are talking about. Most of the Hydrogen dispensers in the World uses their own renewable energy sources to produce Hydrogen also read about PEMs and Hydrogen Ferries.
@@Soothsayer210 how many of those are there? and they already produce enough to fuel every plane across the world? It takes something like 90 megawatts of energy just to get a plane in to the air. That doesn't include the energy to go anywhere after take off including ascension either.
@@Soothsayer210 most hydrogen is produced from fossil fuels because its the cheapest way to produce it.
@@sickbailey21 but even if we produce H2 using PEM from Natural Gas, isn't it still far more cleaner than Fossil Fuels?
Hydrogen is inferior technology.
I can’t believe people are still attempting to make hydrogen work. Best case hydrogen isn’t as efficient as current case electric - surely you stop there?
Better than electric cars
Finally we realise that electric can't and won't be the future
Are you aware that nearly every service stations in the UK have tesla chargers and other electric car chargers? If you had say a tesla now you'd be in a decent spot considering tesla chargers are free and in a lot of places so even long distance is perfectly fine.... Electric cars if they become a standard and improve it can be a good viable option
@@Pleasant_exe
They are very I'm inviromentally friendly log term and inconvenient
People do like change and we would have to drastically change our mourtor way system to compensate for electric cars if all cars were electric
You can fill a car with hydrogen in seconds and the only product is pure water
You could drink from your car
They don't have expensive batteries that need replacing every decade and are extremely damaging to the environment and uneconomically viable long term due to the extra metals that would have to be mined to use in these batteries
There is only so much you can do with batteries in a car no matter how much they progress and they will always die and not take a charge after a while
For the moment they may be more convineant than hydrogen but that's only due to politicians being ignorant and seeing it as a green future
That money could have and should have been put to the hydrogen industry
Your right they are at many service stations but I don't want to stay at a service station and have to wait a long time for my car to charge I don't know anyone who would
And you can integrate hydrogen into petrol engines and make them up to 70% more efficient as all the fuel is burnt as the petrol is mixed with hydrogen and less is taken in in the first place and it is really simple to integrate it unlike a hybrid petrol electric
People and manufactures would be more happy to improve there current engines to include hydrogen than have to redevelop just to make a hybrid
That would slowly lead to a green hydrogen future
1st comment!!
Please. Do yourself a favour and buy a battery electric like a Tesla.
A hydrogen bomb on 4 wheels
Only ev cars is good for enviroment