The Murder of President Kennedy : Eyewitness Account
Vložit
- čas přidán 21. 11. 2023
- Brian Edwards, co-author of Beyond the Fence Line: The Eyewitness Account of Ed Hoffman and the Murder of President Kennedy, speaks at the Allen Public Library.
In 2017, Edwards testified as an expert witness for the defense in a two-day mock trial of Lee Harvey Oswald at the South Texas College of Law in Houston, Texas. In 2020, he was a consultant and appeared in Oliver Stone’s 4-hour documentary, JFK Revisited: Through the Looking Glass, in which he discussed the weapons allegedly used by Lee Oswald.
His latest book, Admitted Assassin will be published later this month.
From 1986 to 1996, Mr. Edwards served with the Lawrence Police Department’s elite counter-assault team. In 1998, Edwards earned a master’s degree in criminal justice from Washburn University and served as an adjunct instructor in the department until 2005.
The library is located at 300 N. Allen Dr. Call 214-509-4911 for additional information
Beverly Oliver sang for Jack Ruby.
===============
Download the ACTV App:
Roku tinyurl.com/3zf4jv7f
AppleTV tinyurl.com/3k8tyc6n
Amazon Fire TV tinyurl.com/brnfsuz4
CITY INFO
===============
City News and Events: www.AllenNews.org
Watch ACTV online 24/7: ACTV.org
Like us: / cityofallen
Follow us: / cityofallentx
Tweet us: / cityofallentx
![[Vowel]물고기는 물에서 살아야 해🐟🤣Fish have to live in the water #funny](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3G9MH063Cx4/mqdefault.jpg)
The only time in my life ive ever heard of anyone cleaning up crime scene before it was processed is when the criminal is doing it.
Yes, Johnson as the new President made sure of that... behind all assassinations is corruption and evil...it digs their feet in deeper to kill FREEDOM...there has always been good and evil...we see it every 4 years...our forefathers would literally be shocked to see the USA today... literally SHOCKED AND SADDENED ...
🎯
Case solved on The Real Revolution podcast
I was having a normal day sitting in my first grade classroom when the principal quickly came in the classroom, whispered something in the teacher's ear and she immediately started crying. The principal let her mourn, turned to the class and told us we would be watching the news for the rest of the day and there would be no talking allowed. He then told us why. That was 60 years ago today.
My mom had just picked be up from kindergarten and we heard the news on the car radio.
I was in 2nd grade and pretty much the same thing! Except the town kids got dismissed and ran home and told our mothers!! A sad day indeed!!
your teacher weeping is such a raw reaction. i was 13 years old in school when the principal came around to our classes to announce what happened and dismissed us, it was a friday just after lunch in the boston area. when i got home my mom was weeping and it was a tough weekend for everyone. i still don't know what to believe and never really got over it even though it's been 60 years now. i'm gonna watch this when i can view it undisturbed.
I too was in the 1st grade attending a Catholic school at the time. The nuns were beside themselves with grief. They wheeled in a portable TV and we didn't dare make a sound while they watched the coverage.
45444444444444444445444444444444444444444544444444444445444454444444444444444444544454454444545444444444544444444444445544445444445444444444454444444444444454444444544444444444445444444544444444444444444444445445444444444444445444444544444444445444444444454444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444544444444444444444444444444444444444444445444444444444454444444454444444444444445444445444444444444445444444444444444444444444444444444444445454444444454454444444445444544444444445444444444444444445444554454444454444444445554444444444544544444444454444444444455444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444454544444444444444444544444454444444444554454444445444445554454444544444444444444444445454444444454444445544444444444455444455445454444444554444454445444554445544444554544444444555444544444444544444444444444444455444454444444454444445544444444454444444544445544444445444544444544454445444444444544455444444444544454454545445455454544444445444444444444444454444454444445544455445445444444445444444444445444544544445454444544444444444444444544444544444544454554444445444444444444544444444444444444444444444444444444444544444445454444444444444445445444444444445444454444444454554444454444r45445444444444444455444444444544444444444444444444444444544444444444445444444454445444444444444444444444445454454544444444444444444554444444444444444444444444444444544544444444544444544444444444444454444444444544444444444554444444444444454444445454444444444444545444444444544444544444444444444544444444444444454444544445554544545444444544444444445444444544444444454444444445444445544544444444444544444444454444444444445444544444444445444444444544444444444544544444454444544444544544544444554454444454444454444444454445454454444444445444444445554444444544444444444454444544444555444444444444444444444444444444444444444544445545454454444w444eeeee4
Being 14 at that time , it had a life long effect on me. I have been a serious history fanatic until this day...I cannot begin to explain what I have learned, but we are in the most TROUBLE I have seen in 74 years !!! I SPENT YEARS IN THE SERVICE, and this time is MUCH more dire, and does not even slightly compare to the trouble we are in right NOW.
Then do something about it soldier, protect your country.
@@rawbacon I do plenty...What do you do ?
Do NOT allow psuedo Nazi prop.ganda into democratic process.
There are some decent potential candidates who would make for good governance instead of what is available
ie: two old codgers
I believe that was the day the whole world changed.
Allen Dullas : Name it
I cannot believe the guy with the radio right next to the guy with the umbrella were never questioned
Zero evidence that guy was carrying (much less brazenly using) any radio and let me get this straight: a coup decided to have a guy pumping an umbrella up and down right next to the limo....
Umbrella man did testify
@@kaneandable187 Yes, he did testify but WHEN did he testify? It was several years after the crime, not during the so-called investigation.
@@kaneandable187 JFK father a US ambassador for England. Waving his umbrella in protest.
@@FidelCastro128 Lol 😂 no no no
I think the most honest and unbiased opinions of what happened to JFK came from the doctors at Parkland hospital who were the FIRST medically trained professionals who saw the president after he was shot. ALL OF THEM said the wound in the neck was an ENTRY WOUND FROM THE FRONT. This would mean TWO shooters at a minimum.
absolutely. Initially it was reported as such and the explanation was that Kennedy had turned right around to wave to supporters, thus exposing his neck to the shooter behind. When film and eyewitnesses showed he never did turn around, it had to become an exit wound. Then therefore who shot Connolly? 3 shooters? At least.
"Herminio Diaz Garcia" he admitted in "1966" he was one of the shooters that killed Kennedy he told that to the CIA and FBI that was never documented and they let him walk free.. David Morales was on the sixth floor using a World War II German Mauser 7.62 mm..I found many documents buy-3 detectives they were all documented by a typewriter..About the weapon on the sixth floor... Roscoe White he was another shooter and then they had officer Tippit a Dirty Cop keep the crowd back from prying eyes so they could assassinate John Kennedy..I also heard that Malcolm "Mac" Wallace was another shooter he was LBJ'S Hitman..All together there were 30 shots fired and three hit Kennedy two hit Governor Connally.. because the Secret Service and the CIA didn't protect the president all documents were destroyed by the CIA..
They did? Really?
You are lying. Those doctors are seen at their first press conference speculating wildly about the wounds, unable to conjecture about numbers, directions, etc. They had no particular problem with the autopsy photos when they examined them for NOVA.
Except that's not true. The Dallas physicians, who, let us stipulate, worked on Kennedy for less than ten minutes and never examined the back of his body, all agreed with autopsy findings. The only exception was Red Duke, who never spoke up until 40 years after the shooting and was universally criticized by other Trauma Room One doctors, some of whom cannot even remember him being there. Even Dr. McClelland, whose testimony also changed over the years is very equivocal and, when pressed, could not seriously dispute autopsy findings.
There have been four high level medical panels which have reviewed the medical evidence and all concluded that the shots came from the rear and above.
The US CIA absolutely had something to do with JFK’s assassination.
"Something to do with it " 😅
Oswald was introduced to the Paines by George de Mohrenschildt. George was CIA and former OSS, Russian-born into a family of Barrons during the Czarist times.
He committed suicide before he could testify before the HSCA, right after begging for help from the CIA Director at the time.
CIA Director was George H.W. Bush.
Now we know they had EVERYTHING to do with it!!
It was Oswald! He acted alone ! Sheeple galore
Your comment is an oxymoron. @@prp3231
I was 5 years old. I remember my mom crying and my dad very upset. This is the only explanation that tells the truth of what happened to our president. Thank you sir I appreciate your work.
He's lying and treating long discredited con artists like Oliver as serious witnesses.
i was five my mom picked me up from school she was crying,,,,,i said did the dog died again
This is the only explanation that tells the truth of what happened to our president.: And how do you know he's telling the truth?
I was 3. It was the first of a couple of times I saw my father cry. He sat alone in the kitchen saying "they killed him, the sonsabitches actually killed him...". When I asked him what was happening he just waved me away and said I can't talk right now son. It was as also the first time I realised outside of tv, people really killed each other. It was like a whole dark world opened up to me. I have as only young but that scene was always imprinted in my memory. I didn't even look at the tv, I was shocked at the state of my father.
@@kingkongz88 And that's also a very good example of how people say "They" when they don't know who it was or how many.
Sad thing is, justice will never come for this.
I was a Junior in High School in 1963. I dreamed a few days before President Kennedy actually died that he had been shot. It was so real to me that when I got up that morning, I ask my Great Aunt (who raised me) if she had heard anything about President Kennedy being shot, and of course she had not and I DO remember where I was when I heard that he had been killed. (unlike George Herbert Walker Bush) (He was in Dallas) I was in Study Hall in the Library at school when it was announced on the PA System. I was a very naïve 17year old and scared to death. I wanted to warn someone, but WHO and they would have never believed me anyway. I cried for weeks!!
Anecdotal. No validity.
@@busterbiloxi3833 Maybe to you, but it happened to me and it is valid!!
@@busterbiloxi3833Get a life!
Wow, you had Great Intuition
@@marybarger6096 I did back then about a lot of things and even now, some few things!!
Fantastic presentation! Allen Library really needs to hold a weekend symposium with all these amazing researchers. We must keep this information Alive and evolving. It has truly become a dream of mine to attend a lecture of Mr. Edward's, Mark Shaw, and Mr. Grover Proctor! What an amazing lineup, and weekend that would be! I'm 40, but my wife and family are completely fascinated with these presentations!
Mark Shaw is much like this Edwards fellow: he just ignores the actual evidence and makes up speculative stories of his own.
@aaronz7056 you do realize Mr. Shaw made a career/living as an attorney? He is the exact Opposite of what you mentioned.
@@figurinechamp6881 Swell, I'll keep that in mind as "Mr. Shaw" keeps doing one lecture after another about the assassination where he never bothers getting around to discussing the evidence in the case and just drones on ominously about Big Brother. lol
@aaronz7056 by 'evidence' you mean the Warren Commission findings? I don't think you understand how our legal system actually works. Shaw paid his bills in Life by Practicing law and studying what you Can prove, not story telling. Proving unreasonable doubt is Literally how he fed his family. The wonderful 'evidence' was tampered and if you don't believe so, you're part of the problem. 2 people shot, 1 bullet recovered. 1 in pristine condition. 1! Ever been to Dealy plaza? It's tiny. 1 Bullet found. What. Evidence?
@@aaronz7056I know Mark Shaws lectures are long, but in my opinion, he does an excellent job presenting evidence and events that point to a CIA conspiracy. The CIA is completely out of control.
I wasn't a combat veteran period. We did have training in the Combat Engineers on how to set up different ambushes. A curve in the road, an obstacle, reduced speed of the target, U shaped, L shaped ambushes and so on. Generate confusion followed by violent destruction of the enemy. Our routes of escape or departure. JFK's motorcade route was perfect for an ambush as we trained. The motorcade had no choice but to go through it. Under fire at that. The ambushers got away as they trained to. Difference was we were in the woods, not Dallas. Not part of a domestic political ambush team. Like the Man said, Tactics, he'd seen before. Military style. Everything he said is how it's done. There was absolutely command and control that day, never was a lone wolf attack.
You neglected to mention that was the standard parade route through Dallas and you couldn't drift between lanes in the plaza to get to the onramp for the Stemmons Freeway to get to the Trade Mart.
@@aaronz7056 Another lie, from the biggest liar!
@@aaronz7056 Earl Cabel changed that parade route with the blessings of Emory Roberts as they could have gone down Main to get to the trade mart, it was to get JFK in a triangular crossfire!
@@duke4384 That's right, I'm "lying..." LOL Perhaps I'm yet another conspirator...
@@spudjohnsonn8122 Yeah, we know the drill: Mayor Cabell was a conspirator in murder and treason. Emory Roberts was a conspirator in murder and treason. Bigfoot was a conspirator in murder and treason.... Oh, and all credible medical, forensic, ballistic, eyewitness and film evidence clearly demonstrates the shots all came from the sixth floor window, and from Oswald's rifle, but, let me guess, the investigators and witnesses were also all conspirators in murder and treason....?
Thank you , City of Allen for posting this video. Brian Edwards has put on an excellent presentation of the events that took place in Dealey Plaza on Nov. 22nd , 1963 , from the perspective of a veteran police investigator.
This is probably the best video presentation that I have watched on the murder of our great President. I was 12 years old when the " Big Event " took place, and it changed my life forever.
Thank you Brian , and The City of Allen public Library.
, Dean ( in Syracuse)
Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate 3 shots over 8-9 seconds.
Zero evidence for multiple shooters.
Zero evidence for a knoll shooter.
Considerable evidence for the shots all coming from the sixth floor window.
Bullet recovered from the stretcher is in a condition perfectly consistent with causing the victims' wounds.
Zero evidence for this ridiculous pyramid-shaped pie chart of conspirators.
Beverly Oliver is a notorious grifter and demonstrable liar discredited decades ago.
Mark Lane was a liar, grifter and con artist.
Hoffman was an unreliable witness who couldn't keep his stories straight.
Oswald didn't shot at the limo while it was on Houston because it would speed past him and leave him a sitting duck for the Secret Service agents behind it.
Lee Bowers was not murdered.
No man pocketed any bullet, officers and witnesses right there firmly said nothing was found.
Oswald was ID'd by nearly a dozen witnesses as shooting Tippit and the shells were matched to his revolver.
Shooting was successfully replicated and would have been child's play.
Genuinely - why is it so good?
It’s got amateur sleuth written all over it.
It’s really quite poor in fact.
Edwards lies his ass off, makes up huge chunks of his talk, and flatly contradicts hard and demonstrable evidence when it suits him. He also introduced and welcomed with open arms Beverly Oliver, a notorious con artist whose credibility was shattered decades ago.
I agree with you oswald did not shoot anyone that day
🤦🏻♂️
He shot JD Tippet. Witnesses saw him and he snuck into the Texas Theater where he was arrested. If he didn’t do it, why did he leave work after the shooting? Why did he change clothes and get his pistol? Nothing else has ever been proven.
This guy is a liar! Oswald qualified as a sharpshooter...scored a 212...thats a FACT! The shots were fired over 11 seconds not 5! The car was almost at a full stop for the final headshot....and Kennedy was not moving around in the limo!!
@@dp5707
🤔..... Lotta sketchy shit went on 🤷♂️
@@mikeandrews1899 Huh??
I was only a child at the time, but I remember my mother and Nana crying listening to the TV.
Over the past 3 or 4 years I've viewed several videos surrounding JFK's death. Your view makes total sense! Thank you for your diligence, and persistence.
This guy takes seriously Beverly Oliver, a notorious grifter and demonstrable liar whose credibility was shredded decades ago.
@@aaronz7056 I see the troll is back
@@danielmundy764No, I just see value in alerting people when they are being misled by lying grifters like Oliver. You are presumably saying you believe she it legit, then?
@@danielmundy764 No, I just see value in alerting people when they are being misled by lying grifters. You are saying you believe Oliver is legit, then?
As a 10 year old at the time with politically active parents I was aware and DEVASTATED by the murder of a prez that was like an Uncle. Changed EVERYTHING 😢
The Government will stick to the lone shooter story forever but the people won’t.
You're right. The Warren Commision was completely a lie. Dorothy Killgallen who was murdered in 1965 had the goods but J. Edgar Hoover probably had her murdered. Check out Carlos Marcello out of New Orleans. Dorothy didn't go to the book depository. She went to the overpass. Check out Author Mark Shaw's presentation at this same library a few years before.
All credible medical, forensic, ballistic, eyewitness and film evidence clearly demonstrates the shots all came from the sixth floor window, and from Oswald's rifle.
People who will study the actual evidence instead of listening to lie-packed crackpot lectures will stick to the lone shooter story.
No, not so long as they don't look at the actual evidence and instead fall for demonstrable liars like Edwards and Oliver.
Except in the last 60 years no non-gov't people either have been able to locate any conspiracies or other shooters or accomplices. Sorry.
Could possibly be the most comprehensive presentation of the assassination that I’ve seen in a long time.
The guy made so many dumb and obviously incorrect comments that it would be difficult for anybody with half a brain to figure out what the truth is!
All speculation and nonsense!
@@kjnest You mean that's The Warren Report. No honest person believes in Magic Bullets and Neurospasms and Oswald Acting Alone. Doesn't matter if you have a 150 IQ, and go to MIT. You are still a dishonest moron, to believe the official charade after charade etc.
@@kjnest - Bill O'Reilly, is that you?😂
@@kjnestyeah, and the Warren report is gospel. They could only dupe the public for so long, then real questions are asked
How can anybody seriously still believe Oswald did it? 😂
Actually, with a constant bombardment from mainstream media that LHO did it and anyone saying different is "nuts", along with completely igorning any important developments like the ARRB revelations in the 1990s and the confession of E. Howard Hunt (not to mention only pro WC books are given reviews in the corporate press) and even popular writers like Steven King have books and TV shows saying LHO did it..that are seen and read by millions of people....the percentage of people who dont believe the WC has actually been dropping! Last I heard, it was at its lowest point ever, at about 50% despite the mountain of evidence and research that has come out in recent years.
Because some people still think the government wouldn’t lie to them 😂 people who do research and call out the warren report as total crap are deemed conspiracy theorist and nut jobs….it’s ridiculous….we all know it wasn’t Oswald …many people involved in it for sure.
Idiot's
By listening to this rubbish!
Possibly because they study the actual evidence instead of listening to crackpot, paranoia-filled lectures?
This is the kind of people we are dealing with, this was on my messages! “Bad Man Skill replied: “duke, Your comment about the Paine's is hidden.”
Ruth Paine: takes in a young mother fleeing an abusive husband, tries to help them get back on their feet, and for that she gets to spend the next 60 years watching armchair detectives happily accuse here without evidence of being a conspirator so long as it suits their crackpot theories...
@@aaronz7056 Why do they hide the fact that they both are CIA assets, it's not by luck, buddy!
@@aaronz7056 Ruth Paine should be deported to Russia!
A mon avis, l'hypothèse la plus convaincante (preuves à l'appui) sur un assassinat méticuleusement mené (contrairement à ce que l'on veut nous faire croire depuis plus de 60 ans). Bravo pour ce travail de détective rondement mené et merci pour le partage !
Thank you for this in-depth presentation! It was very well done. I had just turned 8 years old at the time of the assassination. I remember my parents and all there friends being very upset. My mother was crying non-stop watching the funeral on that Monday. Even as a child, I knew that a terrible wrong had been done and a cover-up. When Lee Oswald was murdered on live TV, no one believed that this was a simple murder! I have now studied this assassination deeply for 60 years. I thank God more of the real truth has come out, and even the names of those involved. The AARB has given us more details than any other for decades. I only believe that there was a much higher power with no name that ordered this murder and as already said, cover-up ..
Nope Oswald did it. I was 5 at the time. All this conspiracy crap is just a nation in mourning and denial of gun violence. Guns don't make anyone safe.
I was also 8 when they publicly executed JFK, my parents were just the same as yours georgiegirl, we were in mourning but we lived in the City of Lancaster, Lancashire England. From that we can assume that there were going to be 8 year olds all over the world that were aware that the world was a less safe place to live and that’s why he was murdered, there’s no money to be made in peace by those dark actors. Body bags are cheap as well. It’s funny how we’ve mirrored each other from across the pond. ❤❤❤
Let me get this straight. You knew when you were in the third grade that there was a cover up? Talk about a confirmation bias in your subsequent 60 years of "study."
Your comment that the ARRB "investigation" has produced more details about the assassination than any other is interesting. The AARB conducted no investigation and was not authorized to do so. A couple of consiracy cranks on the AARB staff stretched the mandate of the board and conducted some hearings but there was no investigstion.
Some members of the board itself were critical of this process and to date, no records released as a result of the ARRB process have shown anything other than Oswald's status as a killer who acted alone.
If you don't mind, I would love to know what books you have found persuasive in your 60 years of study. I bet I already know the titles.
I was 7 but still I was highly intelligent and unbiased enough to know that the story being disceminated on TV was pure bullshit And Mr. smartass who obviously a hasn't researched and knows nothing about guns and therefore is not entitled to an opinion the photographs at parkland hospital which were taken immediately after the murder which have been out for some time now and all you have to do to see them is them is pull them up on your phone asking for Dr. Robert Mc clelands examination of JFK, these photos actually show a 5 inch diameter hole blown out in the BACK of his skull which means that the death shot came from the front NOT the rear where Oswald supposedly was. And if you lyingly claim to know anything about gunshots which you are if you do you would know for a fact that there has never been since the first gun was invented a 5 inch diameter entrance hole , so either shut up with your cover-up or shut up with your ignorance and or lack of comprehensive research beginning with ballistics!
@@jenniferholden9397 Thank you Jennifer for your kind and truthful words. Yes, all over the world even children as young as we knew the truth! If u choose to read one of the blinded morons above that responded to my comment! His statements are factually untrue! The blind and stupid seem to never get it!
Thanks again! BTW: since you are from across the pond ..I wonder if you may agree that something very similar and sinister occurred with P Diana?
This is the best interpretation of the assassination I have ever seen and listened to. Thank you so much for your hard work and dedication.
The study re: the speed of the limo doesn't apply because the driver Bill Greer was looking behind him and had braked and slowed the limo to a near-stop at the moment of the fatal headshot, at which time Greer was looking behind when the fatal shot struck. Only then did he accelerate the limo en route to Parkland Hospital.
He treats Beverly Oliver as a credible witness.
@@aaronz7056 Why was Beverly Oliver's film along with others' never returned to them?
@@DDEENY Possibly because Oliver was full of ****?
Oliver's claims:
a) She was the Babushka Lady.
She could never back this up with evidence and photos of the real B. Lady clearly show her to be a completely different person much, much older than Oliver would have been in 1963.
b) She filmed the assassination with a Yashica Super-8 Zoom camera.
No such camera had yet been invented in 1963.
c) She denied to the ARRB she ever made the above claim.
She made it to several authors, and right on camera in that crapfest The Men Who Killed Kennedy.
d) Her film was seized the evening of Nov. 25 by FBI agent Regis Kennedy and a man ID'ing himself as CIA.
Regis Kennedy was in New Orleans that evening, not in Dallas, and Oliver later dropped the CIA man from her story.
There's much more, but do we REALLY need to go on...?
@@DDEENY Probably because she had no film and probably wasn't even in Dealey Plaza on November 22nd.
You understand, of course, that she claimed to have used a camera that was never invented until 1969. Super Eight film, which she claims to have used, was not introduced until two years after the assassination.
She waited seven years to come forward with her tall tale and when she did, she chose to disclose her story to the fabulist Gary Shaw at a tent revival where she and her husband were grifting for money.
Then there is the fact that she does not resembe the Babushka Lady and that at various times she has denied that she was that person shown in some of the films. The speaker though points her out in the Muchmore photograph even though Oliver herself most recently has denied that the photo depicted her.
Her story has been consistent only in its constant shape shifting. She is just another profiteer and attenion seeker. Never forget that she was 17 years old at the time of the assassination who delayed coming forward with an implausible story. There is just no logic or common sense in CT land.
Great presentation that left me with a couple questions (I know, everyone has questioned everything about this incident since 11/22/63). 1) At 1:05:30 the photo reminded me that Dr. Evalea Glanges (then medical student) stated that she and another nurse saw the hole in the windshield up close and said that it was more than a crack...that you "could stick a pencil through it". Combined with testimony from ER docs, they described the throat wound as a wound of entry. We can't tell which way JFK was facing while he was obscured by the sign, but when he emerges he clutches at his throat. Lining up the throat wound with the hole in the windshield, that would put the shooter somewhere under the triple-underpass, and not the knoll. The surrounding blood spatter did not necessarily result from the same shot. 2) Relative to your comments at 1:06:14, I spent 40 years in LE and Private protective roles and it's always been understood that agents should face away from the protectee, towards a likely source of danger. Not to look at the protectee unless you sense a change in their behavior. Since a photo represents only a brief instant in time (like 1/250th to 1/500th of a second), we can't say for certain what each agent was looking at without going back over their interviews (which we can't validate due to "off-the-record" direction and guidance from superiors at the time). 3) Your photo at 1:06:54 has always left me curious about the visible conical spray pattern forward and above JFK's head. Is that to be seen as ejecta from a frontal missile strike (like a meteor hitting the moon's surface) or exit blast indicating a missile strike from the rear that penetrated through the target? I have been a firearms instructor for 30 years and have always seen this as exit blast coming from a much lower angle that the TSBD upper floors. Your reference to the laundry truck with the bags on the roof was certainly interesting. I'd never heard it referenced before. 4) Finally, the parallels with Roscoe White were certainly suspicious and it is tragic the Warren Commission did not investigate further. But then, there are copies of recordings out here between LBJ and JEH mandating that the purpose of the WC was not to objectively investigate, but rather to "assure the American people that it wasn't a conspiracy and that they had their man". And, of course, that is where the term "conspiracy theory" was born.
a) They were mistaken. Windshield is still in the National Archives, its only damage is a bad crack caused by a bullet fragment which also damaged the chrome plating, from the inside, and it's ludicrous to think somebody desperate to frame this on Oswald from behind stood squarely in front of the limo (where, exactly...?), fired through glass (!), and shot Kennedy in the face. Your assassin directly under the underpass would thus be plainly seen by every witness nearby, and every single person in the motorcade as the vehicles promptly all zoomed right past him after the shooting.
b) Blood and gore went in all directions, splattering everybody sitting forward in the limo, as they all firmly testified.
All bullets and fragments were matched to Oswald's rifle.
Autopsy shows the shots came from behind.
Parkland doctors had no particular problem with the autopsy photos.
Witnesses directly under the window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead.
c) No credible evidence for this Roscoe White malarkey and his known movements that day makes it highly unlikely he even had time to get to the plaza in time for the shooting.
appreciate your ballistics input; it’s pretty evident, sadly, this was an internal coup; ultra conservative leftovers from the OSS which became the CIA had well intentioned, at least in their minds, ideals post WWII. The CIA developed various geo “stations” but it also had other “ops” or special projects, i.e. bay of pigs, Castro et.al. and you name a South or Central American country, Mid East like Iran’s Shah,you can bet, they were working to establish a gov fav to USA. Dictatorship or democracy, didn’t matter long as it made certain folks wealthy and/or US more secure. That’s a noble intent; but it’s ROGUE; post late 70’s, often the DIRECTOR had no idea what black ops was in place, most operatives were not on paper as CIA agents, files were maintained in various ways so PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY was in place. The CIA intertwined with all kinds of renegades, including the Mob, individual politicos like LBJ, any apparatus they could use, and usually they did it without presenting the CIA as the brand. Oswald was a good soldier, well all know about his coveted Japan stint, they recruited him for Russia, im sure he was flattered, bring him back, they know he’s an eager beaver for his military sup’s, the perfect patsy. They had pro-commo here anti-commo same place the next day; the Payne’s, c’mon! So JFK, Oswald a gifted soldier, and a confused nation is the result of a ring of evil idealists that still remains in gov., finance & business, and at the highest institutions of learning to this day.
@@carlmack2188 Ruth Paine: takes in a young mother fleeing an abusive husband, tries to help them get back on their feet, and for that she gets to spend the next 60 years watching paranoid crackpots who can't even spell her name accuse her of being some kind of conspirator in murder and treason so long as it suits their "theories," it's sick.
"It's pretty evident this was an internal coup....?" All credible evidence clearly demonstrates Oswald did this.
@@carlmack2188 Ruth Paine: takes in a young mother fleeing an abusive husband, tries to help them get back on their feet, and for that she gets to spend the next 60 years watching armchair detectives happily libel her as a conspirator without evidence so long as it suits their crackpot "theories."
Any officer worth his salt will leave no stone unturned to find the truth...
According to conspiracy crackpots, every officer on the Dallas Police Department was a conspirator in murder, treason, and the successful escape from justice of the "real killers" of a brother officer with a wife and 3 children.
This is the best presentation I've ever seen. I'm in Australia and was 9 years old when this happened. I remember it clearly - particularly the funeral. My dad was Air Force and always believed it was a multi shooter event.
It's amazing George Bush Sr. Couldn't recall where he was was the day JFK died.
@@stylinstu
I was 10 years old, coming back to class from band class. Didn't understand why everyone was so upset and mad. (I've always been a little slow.) I've asked quite a few people and no one has said they don't remember were they were when they heard of JFK being shot.
Me too !
As a boarder at a Catholic school, I had been appointed sacristan, although I was only 13. I was preparing the Chapel for morning mass on the 23rd November, when one of the Priests mentioned the assassination. It had of course taken place in the dead of night, South African time. I can remember that they were most upset and dedicated their masses to JFK. I remember this as if it was yesterday.
@@stylinstuThat whole family was/is corrupt. Right alongside the Clinton's they claimed opposition with. All liars.
I was in 1st grade, at Terrace Elementary, in Richardson TX when the assassination occurred. I have been to & driven through Dealy Plaza more times than I can remember. Growing up hunting with my father, both fowl and deer, gave me a good understanding of bolt action rifle operation, ammunition & ballistics. Since my childhood, I have had a love of military history, both on a strategic & tactical level.
I do agree with Mr. Edwards general premise of multiple snipers & spotters, potential sniper nests, location intel & ingress and egress. Also, he is absolutely correct that Dealy Plaza is quite small, with no shot being over 150 yds.
However he describes a modern tactical strategy, with modern equipment. In 1962, did the US military have frangible ammunition, for the fatal headshot? Did they use better rifles (Remington 700) chambered, for the 6.5mm round? Was the ‘pristine’ bullet planted on the hospital gurney? What about the recent revelation about another bullet being produced by Paul Landis, a Secret Service agent? Finally, what about the entrance wound to President Kennedy’s lower neck?
The Warren Commission Report leaks like a kitchen sieve. And Arlen Spector’s premise was wrong from the get go. Personally I believe his political career was sealed when he made some back room deal, to shove the ‘Single Bullet Theory’ down the American public’s throat, but that is another matter.
Sadly, when the Secret Service took the President’s body out of Parkland Hospital, any ability to determine bullet trajectory, direction or content was lost. I believe that Oswald was indeed a patsy, the 6th floor window was a lookout perch and the other 2 teams were on the Grassy Knoll & the Courts building.
So many people wanted Kennedy dead…The Mafia for Joe & Bobby’s actions, the Military Industrial Complex for the President’s desire to draw down service levels & open a dialog with Khrushchev, the CIA because of the Bay of Pigs and other coups, old banking cartels & power brokers because they couldn’t control him; JFK was looking to move the USA away from the Federal Reserve system and J. Edgar Hoover & Lyndon Johnson had their own reasons as well. In fact, both of my parents believe LBJ was directly involved & at least partially responsible. Dad called LBJ, “The biggest crook in Texas” when I was on his shoulders in 1961, when he and Ladybird paraded through downtown McKinney.
They did a thorough job in Dealy Plaza that day. Two things happened then…mistrust of the government was born & a coup d'é·tat was carried out.
Write a book dude
@@klnine I barfed all over this. Purely a train of thought.
Great comment!
Who had the means, $ and power to finance this? According to Madeline Brown and John Currington, HL Hunt was the Big Dog who could control LBJ and hated the Kennedys from day 1. Currington wrote a book about HL
Please read the book Mortal Error by Bonar Menninger. Great document from a ballistics expert will change what you know the government has been pushing all these years.
The red dot of the FFP on the overpass is the most underlooked and often omitted locations for a shooter. Right next to it is a GIANT BUSH and literally parking lot / easy exits
Swell: all credible ballistic, medical, forensic, eyewitness and film evidence clearly demonstrate the shots all came from the sixth floor window, and from Oswald's rifle.
This is a great presentation. Very factual info and put together well. Thanks for uploading!
Thank you for this fascinating presentation. Details and projections of how things worked in order to accomplish this assassination really do come together. Every time I thought I had a question of merit, I changed my mind because the conversations and answers took care of it. However, one question I have had for all these years is this: how much did Jacqueline Kennedy know about this horrific event? Trying to think how I might have responded to all of this, if I were she, is just mind boggling. How horrible to have to live with this!
Edwards lies repeatedly, gets one thing wrong after another and he presents Beverly Oliver, a NOTOROIUS grifter whose credibility was shattered decades ago, as some kind of special guest star.
How much did she know beforehand? Well she knew she’d overheard her hubs and LBJ arguing over Connelly riding with him in the limo the next day in the motorcade. She said it was the worst argument she’d ever heard her husband in. He wanted Ralph Yarborough (a senator he despised) riding with him, not Connolly, but JFK wanted Connelly with him because he was trying to gather more conservative democrats, he had the liberal democrat support and didn’t need the photo op with Yarborough. She stated this later in her memoir.
@@marge-bg4zn "How much did she know beforehand...?" This crackpot paranoia just gets sillier and sillier.
I don't think she knew a thing maybe that is why she married. O. RfK if anyone would of found out and maybe that's why he was killed. This had to be high up there was one brother left and his career was almost ended up by a surprise car accident. I certainly think they didn't want a Kennedy in government and yes his son died in another accident that Yeah it is foggy outside was that excuse
@@newnewhutchison991 Crackpot paranoia.
I was age 4 when President Kennedy was killed, so I do not remember that much. My Dad, God rest his soul, never did believe Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone gunman, and neither do I. Thanks for what you have done with this brilliant piece of work!
I, too, was 7 years old, and I was in Dealey Plaza that day, and I know damn well there was more than 1 shooter. I remember we had just moved from Calif to Texas in August that year, and on the day of JFK's funeral, we moved back to Calif, and to this day I have a flash back to that day every time I hear the Texas.
@@bobwilliamson9562 WOW!!! I guess that was a LOT for a 7 year old. I always believed that there had to be more than one shooter!!!
I dare to say the shooter was killed that same day
@@ronaldhall2489 I agree 100%!!
@@jameshaynes4698 I would agree with him!!! I am glad you still have your Dad with you ~ He sounds like a smart man!!!
Kennedy was a sitting duck. Please.
I was 6 years old when this happened and remember how my grandma cried. She kept pictures of John and Robert on the wall until her death.
So did my Nana! Pictures of the Pope, Jesus and JFK!
Thank you so much for sharing this! I too am obsessed with this. I know you are not suicidal! God bless you for all you hours and hours and HOURS of work! You aren’t finished when I typed this so I don’t know yet how you end this, but I hope someday people have to answer for what they did!
He lies his butt off, gets tonnes of facts wrong, and expects us to take seriously Oliver, a notorious grifter and demonstrable liar.
Agree with Aaron - anyone who backs Oliver to the level he does is never going to give you the answers you crave.
If anything, he’ll take you further away! 😂
This is a very compelling investigation on JFK
Wow. Impressive explaining. The best I have heard. Thank you!
He's making up gargantuan chunks of it and utterly ignoring hard and credible evidence.
This is the best and most comprehensive explanation of the JFK assassination I have ever seen.
lol then keep checking out other sources, because this was the worst JFK lecture I've ever seen
Tremendous technical analysis. Thank you for the info on the Mannlicher Carcano, I had not yet heard this perspective. I have heard other investigators discuss the possibility of 5 shooters, the roof of the SBD, the Daltex building hitting Kennedy's right shoulder, a shooter on top of the Courthouse, a shooter who was on the east end of the rail overpass concealed in bushes who fired through the middle of the windshield into Kennedy's throat, and the shooter who did the headshot from the grassy knoll. Anyone who doesn't want to believe all this is acting like an ostrich ...
@@j.dudley8019how is the weather in Tel Aviv shill?
@@curtsmall8596 you forgot Lt. Spock 🖖 at the grassy knoll (Google it)
@@curtsmall8596there are many disinformation shills who are complicit with the government. It's to be expected, when you are over the target, expect flak.
Thanks for having the courage to rub this series for us!
I was nine years old. We went to St. Catherines of Sienna Catholic School when we heard the news about Kennedy being shot.
This was done very well I've read many books on this and watched many documentaries and this is the best presentation so far I wish you could do a collaboration with Jesse Ventura on this.
Ventura is another lying and paranoid clown.
Jesse Ventura would have more sense than get tied up with this bloke!
Edwards is a staggering liar and Ventura is a paranoid crackpot clown.
We will never know with 100% certainty what really happened that day in Dallas. Most of the people who knew the truth or were involved are dead. As a seventh grader in 1963, I can remember that day like it was yesterday.
Not all of them....
I reserve an ounce of hope for truth disclosure.
who do you believe is still alive ?@@janetphillips2875
The names are no longer important. What is important is that our government was involved and successful got away with the assassination of an elected president of the United States of America. That is the day our Republic ended.
I would think that anyone who maybe alive today who was involved would be protected by the statute of limitations. So not sure what else is being hidden. Must be pretty bad I guess
I was 13 .My friend told me Kenady was shot.As I got home my mother and her cousin were crying and Walter Cronkeit was on TV giving minute by minute reports.Next day our school flag flew at half mast and our priest came to school.The funny thing about this was that was in Canada where Kennedy was loved.
One of the best description of how this was done that I have ever seen.
Good grief!
🤦🏻♂️
This guy is such a crackpot he actually takes Beverly Oliver seriously as a "witness," and that's only the beginning as he ignores and even contradicts evidence so long as it suits his "theories."
This is one of the BEST presentations I've ever seen.
I was 12 years old in 1983 when I happened to see a TV program about the JFK Assassination. It was one of those that portrayed Lee as a LONE NUT. As a 12 year old I knew right away that Lee did not pull this off by himself. I did more research and soon came to the conclusion that Lee was not involved at all. He did not murder the president, did not murder JD Tippet nor fire any weapons that day.
My first trip to Dealey Plaza was in 2006. Just as you stated in your presentation, Dealey Plaza was smaller than I thought it would be.
I've been to Dealey Plaza many times since 2006. I always discover something new each time I visit.
I've always thought there were at least 3 teams. 3 shooters and 3 spotters, one accompanying each of the 3 shooters.
Thank you for this excellent presentation. It's much appreciated.
You obviously haven't seen any other one's then, this one is pathetic. 90% "in my opinion" "they must have" "they had to be doing this or that", just made up crap to try to make you think he really knows something. If you want to know the factual details, watch the America's Untold Stories series on JFK assassination along with a bunch of others on LBJ etc. It a CZcams channel. They tell the story & provide material that backs up their presentations, not just expect you to believe what they say.
In that case, do us all a favor and explain how the people framing the innocent Oswald for these crimes could possibly have known:
- Oswald would show up unexpectedly at the Paine house Nov. 21, otherwise they can't pretend he smuggled the rifle Nov. 22
- Oswald wouldn't simply stand out on the sidewalk during the parade
- NOBODY would ever find any bullets or fragments that don't match to Oswald's rifle
- Oswald would lie to police about his whereabouts during the shooting
- Oswald would immediately flee the building after the shooting
- Oswald would take evasive action
- Oswald was guaranteed to go specifically to Oak Cliff
- Oswald owned a revolver at all, where it was, and that he would obtain and retain it
- Oswald would decide at the last minute to put a jacket on, then discard it
- an imposter who looks so much like him he is guaranteed to fool the nearly dozen Oak Cliff eyewitnesses who ID Oswald needs to be hanging around 10th and Patton
- a cop will be driving at 10th and Patton at exactly the right moment to plausibly place Oswald at the crime scene
- the imposter can be certain Oswald is still at liberty
- the imposter can be certain Oswald has come to that general neighbourhood
- Officer Tippit won't simply outdraw the imposter, capture him and blow the whole plot
- no other cop will capture the imposter
- Oswald will not have an ironclad alibi
- the shells will be matched to the revolver Oswald owns and is in possession of
- Oswald will be seen trying to hide from passing police
- Shoe store clerk Brewer will be suspicious enough of Oswald to follow him down the street
- Oswald will be seen ducking into the theater to dodge more passing police
- Oswald will be caught red-handed trying to shoot a second cop
- Oswald will fight so violently 3 officers will be injured just disarming him
- Oswald will observe, "Well, they say it only takes a minute to die" after asking about the penalty for cop-killing
- Oswald will arrogantly refuse to cooperate with any investigator
- Oswald will refuse help from the President of the Dallas Bar Association
- Oswald will act so smug and placid he will even convince his own brother he is guilty
- Oswald will just shrug a hollow, rambling, unsurprised reply when asked on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?"
- the Dallas PD will be on board for the successful escape from justice of the "real killers" of a brother officer with a wife and 3 children
- they can safely approach scores and scores of witnesses, police, FBI, Secret Service, military personnel, doctors, ballistics experts, photographers, x-ray technicians, journalists, Oswald family members, whole commissions, lawyers, senators, congressmen, the D.A., the Chief Justice, etc., and persuade them all to obey illegal orders to commit crimes, assist a coup, and bend over backwards making themselves all eternally loyal accessories to murder and treason....
@@aaronz7056Please re-do your excellent work but this time put the work out front and not as a response to another person’s incorrect statement. No one is going to be able to see your well researched work hidden as a reply to someone else.
@@wallacebell4311 Thanks, I'll see what I can do. Of course it's still futile against the conspiracy theorists: every single time I make that challenge to every one of them, NOBODY has ever been able to answer it. Not one. It's always deflection, "I don't have to answer those questions," "Those questions have already been answered elsewhere," "Those are stupid questions," and the occasional death threat. It's been hilaroius.
@@aaronz7056
Yeah, conspiracy theorists. A bullet that turns 7 times and then ends up on Connelly's stretcher in PRISTINE condition. You LONE NUTTERS are something else........🙄
This is chilling. Being a sniper and cop and his presentation gives concern about who, what and why.
Secret service, ok , police department, not so much.
Was in high school Spanish class at 1:30 the day America changed for ever.
Maybe this guy has a relative who was involved! He seemed pretty informative!😅
All credible evidence points at Oswald.
@@aaronz7056😅
@@Jeff-bz6jp In that case we look forward to you explaining how somebody knew they could safely approach scores and scores of witnesses, police, ballistics experts, FBI, Oswald family members, Secret Service, military personnel, staffs at embassies in another country, doctors, pathologists, x-ray technicians, journalists, shoe store clerks, whole commissions, lawyers, senators, congressmen, the D.A., the Chief Justice, etc., and persuade them all to obey illegal orders to commit crimes and bend over backwards making themselves all eternally loyal accessories to murder and treason.
@@aaronz7056 dude it appears that you are suffering with kool-aid poisoning or cranial rectal insertion.
That "umbrella" would make a great disguise for a hand-held radio.
There are certain things in life that stand out.I was also 7 years old at the time, but I clearly remember finding out about the shooting as I was leaving school for the day. I also remember sitting with my Dad watching the President during the Cuba missile crisis I remember the reports coming out about Bobby Kennedy's assassination, Martin Luther King's killing and also sitting with Mom and Dad watching the moon landing.
Absolutely fascinating. Thank you for all of your hard work. By far the best presentation of REAL & HONEST evidence I've personally ever watched.
He ignores and flatly contradicts the evidence.
He completely misrepresents the facts of the case. Horrible.
Right on fellas 😉
@@andreww8941 That's a brilliant comeback. I repeat, he ignores and flatly contradicts the evidence.
You need to watch more presentations because this was weak sauce.
We knew in 1963 even as 13 year old kids when Ruby Shot Oswald it was a conspiracy. And man oh man was it.
Great, now after 60 years you will presumably present your ironclad evidence.
How, exactly, does "a conspiracy" know it can safely approach scores of witnesses, police, FBI, Secret Service, military personnel, doctors, pathologists, ballistics experts, photographers, x-ray technicians, journalists, Oswald family members, whole commissions, lawyers, congressmen, senators, the D.A., the Chief Justice, shoe store clerks, etc. and persuade them all to obey illegal orders to commit crimes, and bend over backwards making themselves all eternally loyal accessories to murder and treason?
Well, what did whole commissions know compared with some 13-year olds, right?
@@aaronz7056 Yes the commission that just printed what J Edgar Hoover gave them, they didn’t investigate anything. Lol 😂 according to phone call between Hoover and LBJ. lol because it would be a three ring circus.
@@ronniebishop2496 What has that crap got to do with my response to your original comment then? lol
And just HOW, exactly, did "Hoover" safely approach scores and scores of witnesses, police, FBI, Secret Service, military personnel, doctors, pathologists, x-ray technicians, ballistics experts, whole commissions, lawyers, counsels, senators, congressmen, the D.A., the Chief Justice, journalists, whole networks, etc., and persuade them all to obey illegal orders to commit crimes and bend over backwards making themselves all eternally loyal accessories to murder and treason...???
To those who have viewed my presentation, thank you for your remarks. However, it has come to my attention that during my presentation at Allen Public Library on November 16, 2023, some mistakes were made. Reference to the University of Texas sniper incident. On the Powerpoint slide, I had the date of this tragedy as August 1, 1960, when the actual date was August 1, 1966. This was an error that was overlooked during my final review of the slides. Reference to eyewitness Lee Bowers. His date of death was August 9, 1966 at the age of 41. The Powerpoint slide I showed during my presentation showed the headstone of Mr. Bower’s mother and father (Gladys & Lee). There is NO headstone for Lee Bowers at Grove Hill Memorial Park because he was cremated shortly after his death. I should have been more clear on this point. Reference to James Files. During the question and answer period, one attendee asked about James Files and his “confession” that he shot JFK from behind the fence. Per his statement, he was recruited at the last minute to take an active role in the assassination. I find this very difficult to believe. Whomever the shooters were had been training for this event for some time and I find it extremely unlikely that someone would have been brought into an operation of this magnitude at the last minute I regret not responding in more detail about this. I have read Mr. Files’ book, Files on JFK. In addition, I watched the video of his interview he provided to Joe West. From my experience and training as a law enforcement officer who has interviewed/interrogated hundreds of individuals, Mr. Files exhibited numerous deceptive non-verbal cues throughout the interview. In other words, I have serious doubts about his narrative. Reference to Vincent Bugliousi. Another attendee asked if I had read Vincent Bugliousi’s book, Reclaiming History. I do have the book in my library but have not read all 1000 + pages. My reasoning for not reading this mammoth book was because it came to the same conclusions reached by the Warren Commission in 1964. Bugliosi argues that the Warren Commission’s conclusions that Oswald acted alone was correct and completely dismisses even the most remote possibility that there was more than one person involved. My attempt to explain my position was ignored by the individual who posed the question. White socks This information was provided to me personally from a contract agent with the Central Intelligence Agency who claims he was in Dealey Plaza at the time of the shooting. The agent stated that on previous operations members of the “team” would be able to quickly identify themselves by wearing white socks. Several published photographs of the scene in Dealey Plaza immediately after the shooting shows an individual seated next to the man who held the black umbrella. The actions/non-actions of BOTH these men are suspicious. Secondly, the man who may have retrieved a piece of physical evidence from near the manhole cover on the south side of Elm shortly after the assassination was wearing white socks. My point was that either of these men could have been part of a team (the dark-skinned man may have been a spotter/radio communicator) and the man who may have picked up evidence near the manhole cover may have been part of the “clean-up” team. The agent told me that the wearing white socks was a common occurrence during operations that involved numerous “operatives.” Identifying oneself by such a simple piece of clothing was much safer than providing names.
I think Files knows quite a bit, but as a Johnny Roselli lackey not the knoll shooter. You don't put a teenager in to pitch in the World Series, and not with a handgun (Remington Fireball prototype). Also completely unbelievable to me that native American Loy Factor's story of being brought to the 6th floor to perform the shooting, and refusing at the last minute, and being allowed to leave and live a full life without any consequence seems completely impossible to believe ("Men on the 6th Floor" book - which actually is a decent look at Malcolm Wallace, but its premise is unbelievable)
I don't know how many mistakes that you made because I stopped watching at 45 seconds in. Just to repeat what I posted above, "World class marksmanship in 5 and a half seconds" is an asinine claim to make. First of all, the shots were not made in 5 and a half seconds. The WC did not settle on a time span. The 5.6 seconds or less was if it was the second shot that missed. It was the first shot that missed. The shots were made in 8.7 seconds or longer. Also, he only actually scored one hit on the target. The target being Kennedy's head. At the time of that shot, Kennedy was moving directly away from Oswald's position. He was as good as standing still. There was nothing spectacular about those shots. Oswald underperformed that day.
33:20 The Texas University tower shooting incident was in 1966, not 1960; the sniper killed 14 people, not 39!
Thanks for the other clarifications.
2:05 None of the three guys looks "skinny", even by present US standards; the old one in the middle looks thin, not "skinny".
2:50 Your comment on the archived documents was spot on!
a) Phone records demonstrate James Files was in Chicago during the assassination and when confronted with this he tried to claim he was being confused with his own nonexistent twin brother, shortly before NBC cancelled their planned TV show on this lying clown.
b) Your reasoning for not reading Bugliosi's book is that you know he concluded Oswald did it... so you dismiss the book without reading it. Also, he doesn't "dismiss even the remote possibility" there were others involved: he studied the actual evidence which demonstrates Oswald did it.
c) Bowers' words make it clear he heard nothing that would threaten any conspiracy, he didn't die until some two years after he'd already testified, and his car accident was investigated by the police, the HSCA and researcher David Perry, all of whom found no evidence of foul play.
d) We're at the point where the colour of peoples' socks constitutes "evidence...?"
This just goes to show how much of an amateur f...wit you really are. Wasn't 2 hours of your crap on the podium enough and now an essay on this format to correct your pathetic errors. And you were a cop. My God. But as they say only in america
Could there have been shooters underneath the Underpass at the far end of the bridge as seen in the stillshot photo at 1:31:57 ?
I've thought of this too but it's lower in elevation?
That's right: somebody desperate to frame this on Oswald from a window behind the limo stood in front of the car (under a bridge where they would be plainly visible) and shot Kennedy in the face with different guns...
Mr. Edwards, I am 63 years old and have accumulated at least 100 books in my library regarding the JFK Assassination. I have read every one of them and am always looking to add to my library. I have also seen dozens of videos and T.V. specials and lots of CZcams videos. Anything I can get my hands, eyes or ears on. ALWAYS willing to learn something new. I certainly did as I had NEVER heard about the yellow stripes on the south curb of Elm Street across from the grassy knoll. Thank you for this information!
I have hundreds of questions, however I will stick with one as I am sure you are very busy. If you can answer I would appreciate it and if not thank you anyway.
Police Officer Joe Marshall Smith ran up the grassy knoll and behind the picket fence. He testified that there was a man who identified himself as Secret Service. However, he noticed that he had dirt under his fingernails. Most Police Officers are trained observers and would notice the small things as well as the obvious things. Did anyone ever ask P.O. Smith what the man looked like? And if they did what did his testimony say?
I am going to add that I know that you worked in law enforcement for over 20 years and correct me if I am wrong but wouldn't you say that when ANYONE identifies himself as law enforcement and is not that this is a BIG GIANT RED FLAG!
I have not even mentioned the other individuals that also identified themselves as Secret Service behind the TSBD.
Would you have any information regarding Police Officer Joe Marshall Smith and what he saw or didn't see or what he was asked or not asked?
Thank You Mr. Edwards for all your hard work and dedication. Please keep fighting the good fight!
Vaya Con Dios!
One cop met a man who flashed some ID at him he never even saw clearly and the man certainly never claimed to be Secret Service, he could have been any of the police or agents swarming the area after the assassination. It makes zero sense to plant phony Secret Service agents on the knoll in any case, ID'ing themselves as "Secret Service." What if they themselves get caught or detained? As soon as the REAL Secret Service says they had no agents up there, they confirm a conspiracy is operating!
Look up operation 40 it was a CIA Black Ops set up by George Bush Senior there was a total of three shooters after Kennedy was assassinated Barry seal a CIA very experienced pilot took the shooters out of Dallas back to Cuba..Don't read the article go to the images and you will see the men responsible for taking out Kennedy they are at a Mexican city restaurant in 1963..What names get back to me if you don't kind it.. one of the shooters in 1966 even admitted to the FBI and CIA that he was one of the shooters at the picket fence dressed as a police officer they never documented anything and set him free..The rifle on the sixth floor was a World War II German Mauser 7.65 mm..The one guy that was involved with the John Kennedy assassination was also the one that executed his brother Robert Kennedy from behind..👉🏻👍
@@melbourne-heat.69-71
Thank You! I appreciate your feedback!
Do you happen to know if Lucien Sarti/Michael Mertz known French Assassins were part of any of the hit teams or were these names just thrown in to get the dogs off their scent?
@@juancervantes4085 There was a total of three shooters..Bush Sr. Put everything in motion.. David Morales, Frank Sturgis.. Frank Sturgis was also involved in Watergate..The shooter at the picket fence hit Kennedy in the temple he was dressed as a police officer "Hermino Diaz Garcia".. All three were militants and CIA from Cuba they were also trying to assassinate Fidel Castro.."Barry Seal"CIA.. a very accomplished pilot took all the shooters from Dallas airport back to Cuba..Barry got involved with Big Time cocaine smuggling gun running money laundering you will even see him in pictures with Pablo Escobar..When he decided to set up shop in the same town in Arkansas right next to the Clinton's.. and kept the cocaine the guns and the money laundering flowing..Bush Sr. Put a hit on Barry Seals and had him taken out.. "Operations 40" it was a CIA Black Ops.. if you Google Operation 40 do not read the article top left-hand corner hit (images) it will show you all the guys that were involved by name the picture is at a restaurant in Mexico City in 1963..As you click on their name they talk about John Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, and two of the guys got into Congress were involved in September 11th..Porter Goss & Bob Graham Bob was also running to be president in 2004..Porter Goss talks about wiring money $100 thousand dollars to Muhammad Alta..The morning the planes hit why would he send him $100,000 if he's going to die within the next hour something to think about you can dig as deep as you want..The Truth has always been there..Most of the guys that were involved were assassinated committed suicide because dead man don't talk..
@@melbourne-heat.69-71 "Three shooters:"
All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle.
Victims' wounds all demonstrably line up and track straight back to the sixth floor window.
Witnesses a few feet directly under that window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead.
It's vastly implausible anybody would ever assume they would frame this on a lone shooter while firing from multiple directions.
No Mauser was ever found, cops freely owned up to misidentifying the unfamiliar rifle at first, big deal, and news film clearly shows it to be Oswald's Carcano.
The idea somebody would leave the wrong kind of rifle lying around the crime scene for an army of police to find is laughable.
Brilliant presentation .Thank you sir. People like you will save USA
Yes, the presentation that presented special guest star Beverly Oliver is "brilliant."
I was a kid and my father was a veteran of the Korean War, he said to everyone in earshotthat was a hit by someone very powerful in our own government murdered our President, and my mom was crying and remember the neighbors were crying, I was a kid just wondering what was going on in our house, and why were all these people crying?
The best yet ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Was in 5th grade. had gone on a class trip at school. When we returned back to the school about 3:10 the vice principle was at the bus door as we were getting off announcing that the President had just been shot. went home...My parents had the TV on the rest of that day all weekend !
The man is a demonstrable liar and he ignores and contradicts demonstrable evidence.
This crackpot is so gullible he actually takes Beverly Oliver seriously as a witness...
Great information! Thank you Mr. Edwards. I too was 7yrs old when JFK was assassinated. I wish I had been in attendance at this event because I have this question I have always wanted this answered. My thoughts are that I believe Oswald was involved in the assassination because when you set up a 'patsy' you don't just grab an innocent bystander to accuse. The 'patsy' has to be someone involved but not be aware of the possibility of being accused of the crime. He could have been one of the shooters also or not a shooter at all. Ruby HAD to kill Oswald so as not to ascertain the truth in what happened. This is my opinion.
Opinions are not evidence.
Oswald owned and smuggled the rifle.
Oswald's latent print was on the rifle.
All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle.
A man was seen in the window who could very plausibly have been Oswald.
No unidentified persons were ever caught inside the building.
Oswald lied to police about his whereabouts during the shooting.
Oswald was the only employee inside the building during the shooting to immediately flee the plaza.
Oswald refused to cooperate with any investigator.
Oswald never attempted to blow any conspiracy to any cop, any member of his family, to the President of the Dallas Bar Association, or to a live TV audience of millions.
Jack Ruby, on the other hand, was still hanging around in line in a Western Union office on a minor errand well after Oswald was already supposed to have been transferred.
@@aaronz7056 There were at least 20 people that fled the building during the shooting.
@@ktcarl Great. Now presumably you will enlighten us as to how many of those other 20 employees:
- owned the rifle
- smuggled the rifle
- left their latent prints on the rifle
- lied to police about their whereabouts during the shooting
- were actually inside the building during the shooting
- did not return to the building
- took evasive action to get to their rooming houses
- were seen by multiple witnesses murdering a police officer
- owned and were in possession of the revolver to which the shells were matched
- were seen trying to hide from passing police
- were seen ducking into theaters to dodge more police
- were caught red-handed trying to shoot another police officer
- fought police so violently 3 officers were injured just disarming them
- observed, "Well, they say it only takes a minute to die" after asking about the penalty for cop-killing
- refused to cooperate with any investigator
- refused help from the President of the Dallas Bar Association
- acted so smug and arrogant they even convinced their own brothers they were murderers
- just shrugged hollow and rambling replies when asked hours later on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?"
@@aaronz7056 After you tell me why the Government still won't release all the information on file like they were supposed to. Obviously, someone doesn't want the truth come to light.
@@aaronz7056 are you trolling?
And as for the tippet shooting, 2 different kinds of ammunition was used. " one of the was from a 38 auto, ( or should I say a 380) !
Interesting that in April Oswald missed General Walker from 100 feet and hit a moving JFK 266 feet away with the same rifle.
we don't know for a fact he shot at Walker. Very little evidence of that other than "See? He's crazy, this proves it."
I was a combat MARINE this was hit in the fore head blew out back of his head THIS WHAT HAPPENS WITH A SHOT IN THE TOP Of HIS HEAD BLEW OUT HIS HEAD.I KNOW IVE SEEN PEOPLE HIT IN THE FORE HEAD AND EXPLODE OUT THE BACK.CASE CLOSED.IM JUST A COMBAT MARINE SO I DON'T KNOW WHAT IM TALKING ABOUT. PLEASE BEAM ME UP
@@robertkoth4022 He was shot in the right temple using fragmentary bullets. But anyhow, you are correct, the shot came from the front.
Still trying to confuse, and make scenarios that reek of intelligence. Nothing in intelligence happens by chance, nothing!
“If you didn’t see Oswald pull the trigger, we don’t want to talk to you.”
They talked to dozens, even hundreds, of people.
and let all reports down, showing evidence for others shooters@@aaronz7056
@@aaronz7056 And only invited the people that followed their narrative to the commission!
@@brettsantini9854 B.S.
@@aaronz7056A Z Absolute Zombie
Lee Harvey Oswald was the scapegoat. Jack Ruby killed him so he wouldn't talk.
Your scapegoat owned and smuggled the rifle, lied to police about his whereabouts, immediately fled the crime scene, murdered a cop, was caught trying to murder a second cop, refused to cooperate, refused help from the President of the Dallas Bar Association, acted so smug he even convinced his own brother he was guilty, never attempted to blow any conspiracy to anybody, and just shrugged a hollow, rambling reply when asked on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?"
Your scapegoat, after being caught red-handed trying to murder a cop, never attempted to blow any conspiracy framing him to anybody.
@@aaronz7056how do you know. The police talks with Oswaldwere not recorded, and no written. He says front of the press when he just know that he was accused for the murder of president too.. « i’ m just a patsy »… you can see on youtube.
@@aaronz7056🙄
@@someoneunseen5168 I have said something inaccurate?
The Zapruder film answered the question where the fatal shot came from,if you were hit by a projectile traveling at 2-3000 FPS you head would not be moved toward the impact it will move in the same direction the projectile was traveling.
Where have you been? The zapruder film was altered and damaged and edited and changed. The back of his head was ‘painted’ black. It don’t prove shit.
@@williamcarr459 And no one, not even a cinematic authority like yourself, has ever proved the Z-film was ever altered (or "damaged").
@normanmaynor5705 Muscles on the backside of the body are far stronger than the front side.. JFK was already bent over and leaning to the left. It was a neurological response; the muscles fired, and you get exactly what you saw.
His head moved initially FORWARD in Z-film frame #312, followed by the more noticeable backward recoil. This initial forward movement "answers the question" whence the fatal shot came. It was from *_behind_* .
@@stddisclaimer8020😅
@@stddisclaimer8020 rubbish, as witness have said and what the film shows are two nearly concurrent shots, one from the back and the fatal shot from the front
At the siege of Vienna, Lithuanian leader Jan Sobieski had his army march up the side of The Kahlenberg mountain at night while raining, with cannons, horses and men and at morning, he did exactly that, fired from high while concealed. The Ottomans had no time to react. The Kahlenberg did not have a single road or footpath and he lost only two cannons.
It is a shame that more people did not come listen to this lecture. Young people need to hear this and start investigating so this issue doesn't go quiet.
My first memory is my 2nd birthday.
On 11/22/63, I had turned 3 the day before, on Nov 21st. I clearly remember hearing a radio and my great grandmother crying and being very upset. I later found out, it was my great grandmother's response to the shooting and death of President Kennedy.
After watching this video, I really appreciate the materials contained and the method of presentation --- Thank you!
The method of presentation is to showcase a notorious grifter in the person of Beverly Oliver, lie his butt off, make up huge chunks of his narrative, and ignore and contradict hard evidence whenever it suits his "theories."
This was very informative. No one to my knowledge has studied the "kill zone" in this many ways and I do not remember anyone talking about all those yellows stripes on the curb. I only remember them mentioning the one closest to where the President received the fatal shot. Not along the entire length of Elm. You won't find that in very many places.
The yellow stripes are normal markers telling cars that there’s a curb there.
I promise you & every single person who still breathes, that I have a secret, that I've kept for 3 decades! It will be the one thing that actually solves the horrific murder, of my beloved President 💔 I wish Art Bell were still alive ~ I'm too frightened to come forward. I'm so old, now, that I should not care, but this runs deep.
Re: "No one to my knowledge has studied the 'kill zone"'"
No one except the Warren Commission, the Rockefeller Commission and the House Select Committe on Assassinations. Read some history before embracing conspiracy nonsense.
@@phyllisneal8687 Bless you for carrying your secret so long. Even if you come forward if your secret is anything other than only Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone, you'd be discredited or deemed mistaken or wrong.
@phyllisneal8687 If you are telling the truth, you need to bring it to light, before it's to late! Dorothy Kilgallen died before she could tell the world what she had uncovered about the JFK assassination. Her knowledge died with her. Have courage, and come forward. We need to know what you know!!
Incredible presentation! Thank you Brian and the city of Allen Texas! 😀👍🇺🇲
He's making up huge chunks of this story.
This is excellent, great job !
Packed with lies, fabrications, contradicts the evidence... yes, great job!
By far the most detailed as possible, without naming names-of the scenario as what to happened that terrible day. My only regret is after watching this, it wasn't longer!! Bravo, great job. I was seven yrs. old at that time, but I remember it as only yesterday. My Mom went to D.C. that weekend to view the casket and stood outside in the many crowds on Monday for the funeral procession. We will probably never know those names, as to who did this.
Zero evidence exists for multiple shooters or any knoll shooter.
Considerable evidence for all the shots coming from the sixth floor window.
Zero evidence for this ridiculous graph/flow chart of "conspirators.
Zero evidence Lee Bowers was murdered.
Zero evidence that man pocketed any bullet and other officers and witnesses present firmly testified nothing was found.
Oswald bought his rifle long before Kennedy's Texas trip was even thought of and he was too poor to afford another one.
Beverly Oliver is a notorious con artist and demonstrable liar whose credibility was shredded decades ago.
Mark Lane was a notorious con artist and demonstrable liar.
Hoffman was an unreliable witness whose story changed.
Bullet recovered from the stretcher is EXACTLY in a condition consistent with causing the victims' wounds.
Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate 3 shots over 8-9 seconds with several seconds between each, it has (needless to say) been successfully recreated, and if fact would be child's play.
Any idiot knows Oswald didn't fire at the limo while it was still on Houston because it would zoom past him and leave him a sitting duck for the Secret Service agents behind it, he was mad but he wasn't stupid.
Oswald was ID'd by nearly a dozen witnesses as shooting Tippit and fleeing and the shells were matched to the gun he owned and was in possession of, he later observed, "Well, they say it only takes a minute to die" after asking about the penalty for cop killing, after he was caught red-handed trying to shoot a second cop.
"Most detailed..." the guy is lying his butt off, making up whole chunks of his story, and he's flatly contradicted hard evidence.
I'm angry that our government classifies crimes like this instead of arresting the ppl
they would have to arrest themselves.
That's a difficult thing to do when the government is implicit in the crime!
Thank you Mr Edwards
Great job with the song at the beginning. It allowed the focus on the words!
I think your presentation was spot on and I enjoyed it immensely!! Thank You for your research and time doing this!!
He takes seriously Beverly Oliver, a notorious con artist and grifter whose credibility was shattered decades ago.
Lines were also painted on other roads, they are standard markings.
Zero evidence for this ridiculous pie chart of "conspirators."
Zero evidence for "multiple shooters" (an implausibly scenario anyway) or any knoll shooter.
Considerable evidence for all the shots coming from the sixth floor window.
Oswald bought his rifle long before Kennedy's Texas trip was even thought of and he couldn't afford another one.
Any idiot knows Oswald didn't fire at the limo on Houston because it would zoom past him and leave him a sitting duck for the Secret Service agents behind it.
Bowers' words make it clear he saw nothing that would threaten any "conspiracy," he didn't die until some two years after he had already testified, and his car accident was investigated by the police, the HSCA and researcher David Perry, none of whom found any evidence of foul play.
Oswald was ID'd by nearly a dozen witnesses, shells were matched to the gun he owned and was in possession of, he was caught minutes later trying to shoot a second cop, and observed, "Well, they say it only takes a minute to die" after asking about the penalty for cop-killing.
Zero evidence that man pocketed any bullet, other officers and witnesses firmly said nothing was found.
Hoffman was an unreliable witness who changed his stories.
Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate 3 shots over 8-9 seconds with several seconds between each shot, it was successfully recreated (needless to say), and it would have been child's play.
Edwards, like all conspiracy theorists, never explains how anybody would ever assume they would frame this on a lone shooter while firing away from multiple directions.
He's making up tonnes of it and he's flatly contradicting hard evidence.
I'm sorry, but this guy is one of those P.D. legends in his own mind!!! I own 3 Carcano rifles, I've been around firearms, shooting, customizing and building them for about 40-years now and this guy is talking outta his arse as far as rifles are concerned!!! Whether or not a Carcano rifle was fired that day is immaterial. I happen to see no problem with Carcano rifles other than them being something I definitely wouldn't use for a crucial sniper shot even though they've been used for 1,000-yard shots before, particularly the Carcano type i. Just because all he knows is the Remington 700 doesn't make every other rifle a piece of dangerous junk. This guy has been brainwashed by his "training" into believing he's an all-knowing oracle on firearms, which seems to become the attitude of all cops. They just hate the thought of civilians being their equal!!!
In reality, a couple of friends who're good shots could've pulled this shooting off, I'm not saying that's what happened, but I'm not "trained" persay and could've hit JFK with my scoped lever-action Marlin 30-30, these weren't as hard a bunch of shots as people like this guy wanna portray them as being. Just an example, I took a Remington 870 pump right outta the box and took the black center out of a 25-foot pistol target with a 3"magnum slug at 50-yards with open sights, now try doing that junior, you can't even see the target at that range. I could've parted JFK's hair from those distances with my Marlin model 99.
Law enforcement and military personnel aren't the only people who know how to shoot, this attitude stems from the arrogance of these cops who seem to forget, or wish we didn't have a 2nd Amendment. We have a nation full of excellent shooters who dont need a badge or have a military rank to hit bullseyes.This guy is really spreading some misleading information, but he's entitled to his beliefs. I do agree 100% with a lot of what he said and he did notice things that i thought i only noticed. People need to understand that it's not an enigma to be a good shooter in America, this propaganda has scared so many people in America about using firearms, it's not that complicated or scary, renting a nail gun to fix your roof is more dangerous if you dont know what you're doing 😮
I agree that he states a lot of stuff as truth when in fact he has none. Many of his photos he is describing something that cannot be seen.
"but I'm not "trained" persay and could've hit JFK with my scoped lever-action Marlin 30-30," ?
Why then all those marksmen who had attempted to repeat Oswald's supposed feat using the same carbine he had allegedly used, failed the test?
Shooting with any handgun or rifle is not difficult per se, as dozens of cases of mass shootings in the USA had shown time and again. The shooters always managed to kill many people, and we don't even know if they had had any prior exposure to firearms, let alone training. Some of them reportedly even bought their weapon on the eve of their action!
But Kennedy assassination doesn't fall in that category, as *it was conspiracy to kill a particular person* at a particular moment. So, not a random act.
That's why proper skills and adequate tool were of utmost importance for success. Oswald didn't seem to have had either, and that is the sticking point in the official theory.
@@truthadvocacy Uhhhh, you just answered your own question fool!!!! Did you even think before you wrote that?!?!? This is a totally unrelated rambling and where did i say that this could've been done with a Carcano model 38 in that allotted time frame?!?!? NO WHERE!! You dont even know what you're talking about and ya should go back and reread what I said. People like you shouldn't be allowed to vote😂😃🤣😄🤣
@@truthadvocacy Shooting was successfully recreated and 3 shots over 8-9 seconds at a slow moving target a maximum of 88 yards off his hardly a superhuman feat. Oswald scored 18 out of 20 in rapid fire at targets 200 yards away and it's right there in his Marines scorebook.
Brilliant presentation. The only thing I would like to add is about the shooters. A video on You Tube a plausible case was made that some of the gunmen were hit men from Europe and after the hit they were flown out of the country through Montreal Canada. This was the modus operinde of the CIA. I would like your opinion on this view B.Edwards?
This "brilliant presentation" ignores and contradicts the actual evidence.
Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo, from behind.
Victims' wounds demonstrably line up on a perfect trajectory and track straight back to the sixth floor window.
View of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been demonstrably blocked by Kennedy's body, the same bullet has to have gone through both of them.
All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle.
Bullet recovered from the stretcher was also matched to Oswald's rifle.
That bullet is in a condition perfectly consistent with going through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling on leaving him, as it would have done, and broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs, as medical and forensic evidence clearly demonstrate: badly crushed at the nose and flattened down one side.
Nobody planting a bogus bullet at the hospital within one hour of the shooting could possibly have known a bullet needed planting at all or that he wasn't simply planting one bullet too many into evidence and blowing the whole plot.
Kennedy's massive exit wound plainly seen exploding at the right temple is consistent ONLY with a shot from behind.
Connally's said the shots came from behind.
Witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead.
Those witnesses had a clear view behind the knoll fence and would plainly have seen any gunman there.
Zapruder's secretary was yards away from the fence and said there was nobody there.
Autopsy shows the shots came from behind.
Parkland doctors had no particular problem with the autopsy photos.
I've yet to hear Edwards or any other conspiracy theorist explain how anybody would ever assume they would successfully frame this all on a lone shooter while firing from multiple directions.
@@aaronz7056 How much do they pay you to twist the truth! Our fight is within! You are the enemy.
I know of the man that shot kennedy from the grassey knoll.He shot kennedy in the face with a 22 calibur magnum fireball with a silencer on it.He flew to dallas on a MAT,military air transport and while in route he got a call to cancel,then later it was back on.He said they tried to call it off but could not get a hold of everybody in time.He was a soldier in vietnam and when he came home he did some murders for the mob.The MAT landed 4 hrs before kennedy showed up,so he and two other men went to the desert for a couple hrs to do some shooting.He had a secret service I.D. and hadto show it when police stopped him going to his car with his break down gun in a suitcase.He died in a texas prison in 1999.30 days before he died,he got in contact with an fbi agent who he told everything to.The agent could not catch him in a lie.He completely checked out.The man and son that found the spent cartridge on the grassy knoll turned it in.He stated that everytimehe shot a bullet,he would put the shell cassing in his mouth and bite it.The fbi had his teeth tested and matched with the cassing,it was a match!
James Files' claims:
a) He and Oswald were palling around in New Orleans in 1961.
Oswald was in Minsk throughout 1961.
b) He was present the morning of the assassination at a Dallas meeting where it was discussed how the parade route was changed.
The route was never changed, accurately described in the newspapers from the beginning.
c) He was a knoll assassin.
Phone records demonstrate Files was in Chicago during the assassination and when confronted with this he tried to claim he was being confused with his own, nonexistent twin brother.
NBC cancelled their planned TV show on this lying clown after they took a closer look at him.
Best commentary I have heard!
You realize he's just making up huge chunks of it, right? He also lies and flatly contradicts hard evidence.
@@aaronz7056The hard evidence like the magic bullet that the Warren Omission said went through Kennedy hit Connolly and found on a stretcher at Parkland Hospital in pristine condition?
I heard the funeral director being interviewed by Alex Jones. The funeral director said as he had Harvey Lee Oswald awaiting his funeral by his family laying in the morgue 4 CIA cane in with a gun they used the dead Harvey’s finger prints being put on the rifle. The ink to obtain the finger prints on the gun made a horrible mess he had to clean up afterward prior to the funeral. That alone tell Lee’s innocence. Read the book “ Lee and Me “
Alex Jones, ladies and gentlemen.... plus that B.S. story is completely implausible.
Ms. Baker is a lying grifter who could never prove she was Oswald's "mistress" and never addressed the evidence against him.
We now look forward to you explaining how the people framing the "innocent Oswald" could possibly have known:
- Oswald would show up unexpectedly at the Paine house Nov. 21 so they can pretend he smuggled the rifle Nov. 22
- he would suddenly possess a package the next morning he didn't arrive with
- he wouldn't simply stand out on the sidewalk during the parade
- nobody would ever find any bullets or fragments that don't match to his rifle
- no unidentified persons would ever be caught inside the building
- Oswald would immediately flee the plaza
- Oswald would take evasive action
- Oswald was guaranteed to go specifically to Oak Cliff
- Oswald owns a revolver, where it is, and he would obtain and retain it
- Oswald would decide at the last minute to put a jacket on, then discard it in the streets
- an imposter who looks so much like him he is guaranteed to fool the nearly dozen Oak Cliff witnesses who ID Oswald needs to be hanging around 10th and Patton
- a cop will be driving at 10th and Patton at exactly the right moment to plausibly place Oswald at the scene
- the imposter can be certain Oswald is still at liberty
- the imposter can be certain Oswald has come to the general neighbourhood
- the cop won't simply outdraw the imposter, capture him and blow the whole plot
- Oswald will be seen trying to hide from passing police
- Oswald will be caught red-handed trying to shoot a second cop
- Oswald will fight so violently 3 officers will be injured just disarming him
- Oswald will observe, "Well, they say it only takes a minute to die" after asking about the penalty for cop-killing
- Oswald will lie to police, starting with about his whereabouts during the assassination
- Oswald will refuse to cooperate with any investigator
- Oswald will refuse help from the President of the Dallas Bar Association
- Oswald will act so smug he will even convince his own brother he is guilty
- Oswald will just shrug a hollow, rambling reply when asked on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?"
- the Dallas PD will be on board for the successful escape from justice of the "real killers" of a brother officer with a wife and 3 children
- they can safely approach scores and scores of witnesses, police, Secret Service, FBI, Oswald family members, ballistics experts, military personnel, doctors, pathologists, x-ray technicians, photographers, journalists, staffs at embassies in another country, whole commissions, lawyers, senators, congressmen, the D.A., the Chief Justice, etc., and persuade them all to obey illegal orders to commit crimes, assist a coup and bend over backwards making themselves all eternally loyal accessories to murder and treason....
The problem is you don't use ink to leave fingerprints.
"Interviewed by Alex Jones...."
The CIA connections of Oswald are already proven. He was the perfect patsy. Because he was one of theirs. This cover up is a mess, because you can not cover up a job committed by dozens of people. You only can try to obfuscate. And as we see, they do it still today,...ofc!
why would you use ink to pout a fingerprint on a rifle?
I was seven and we lived in Norfolk, Virginia at the Staff College. I remember it well as it was a sad time.
Everybody's saying this is the best presentation. . I can't wait to watch in it's entirety
Save your time and instead watch JFK to 9/11. Everything's a rich man's trick". It's 3 hours 27 minutes and covers it better than anything you'll ever see. Fantastic documentary.
He's demonstrably lying his butt off.
My mother used to go bowling with Mary Moorman before the assassination. She talked to her about the assassination later on.
What’s your point?
Here it is December 3 2023 and we still have reporters and journalists haven't updated their reports to what happened in Dallas Texas, November 22 1963 when Kennedy was murdered.
With the reports at that time, the journalists have interviewed witness of the shooting around the grassy knoll, most of are detailed information, this is why Warren commission didnt want their help,
From all the information that is available to this day Oswald is not the shooter. Because there were multiple shooters.
This was such a great presentation. Best one Ive seen yet.
Thank you Sir! For your many years of hard work!!
He lies repeatedly and gets tonnes of facts demonstrably wrong.
Yes, he's brilliant. Great technical analysis from a qualified person.
@@jimmycricket5366 Zero evidence exists for multiple shooters.
Zero evidence exists for any knoll shooter.
Considerable evidence exists for the shots all coming from the sixth floor window, and from Oswald's rifle.
Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate 3 shots over 8-9 seconds, well within Oswald's capability.
Shooting has been successfully recreated, in fact it would have been child's play.
Bullet recovered from the stretcher is in a condition perfectly consistent with causing the victims' wounds.
Shells were matched to the revolver Oswald owned and was in possession of and he was ID'd by nearly a dozen witnesses as shooting Tippit and fleeing the scene.
I've always had doubt because as a teenager I owned a 6.5 Italian...it was $13 at a local dept store and you could get military surplus ammo for almost nothing but misfire rate was high and a little scary. Lee's would have had to be a lot more accurate than the one I had that's for sure, and I junked it when I heard about the bolts blowing out..
All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle.
Oswald scored 18 out of 20 in rapid fire at targets 200 yards away as per his Marines scorecard.
Kennedy was a slow-moving target a maximum of 88 yards away.
@@aaronz7056 Maybe Oswald had the only accurate mail order military surplus 6.5 Italian ever and was lucky enough it didn't kill him instead of his target...but I hope you're not saying Marines at the time used 6.5 Italians for scoring because I don't think so...
@@oilsmokejones3452 What the hell did I literally just say above? lol
@@aaronz7056 None of your claims had any evidence to back it up.
Oswald was an average shooter during his army years, and even if he were a sharp shooter, he couldn't have scored any hit on Kennedy, as far better skilled marksmen were unable to repeat his feat, using *the same carbine* he was alleged to have used.
@@truthadvocacy That's right, none of my claims have any evidence to back it up... LOL
I repeat: Kennedy was a slow moving target demonstrably a maximum of 88 yards off (and there's "no evidence" to back that up???").
Oswald's own Marines scorebook plainly lists his record.
All bullet and fragments ever found were matched to his rifle.
Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate 3 shots over 8-9 seconds, with several seconds between each shot. That's child's play, for the love of Pete...
You can watch, for just two examples, Josiah Thompson in Who Killed President Kennedy and John K. Lattimer in Beyond Conspiracy, easily operating a Carcano well within that time line.
Mark Groubert also does not think Oswald killed Tippet and a second wallet of Oswald was likely planted where Tippet died. And Ruby’s apartment was walking distance from there!
Mark Groubert's record:
a) cranks out videos giving his middle finger to Tippit's family as he opines away without evidence the man was a conspirator so long as it suits his crackpot "theories"
b) does the same to Ruth Paine as though he's just dying to get his ass sued for slander
c) has no qualms whatsoever about hawking books written by that unspeakable monster Alex Jones.
As for Oswald, he was ID'd by nearly a dozen witnesses, owned and was in possession of the murder weapon, tried to kill a second cop minutes later, fought police so violently 3 officers were injured just disarming him, and observed, "Well, they say it only takes a minute to die" after asking about the penalty for cop-killing.
Oh, and the wallet you see being handled was almost certainly Benavides' but why bring that up?
How the hell does anybody know they need to have some imposter hanging around 10th and Patton to shoot a cop they magically know is going to be driving by at exactly the right moment to plausibly place Oswald at the scene?
How do they know Oswald is still at liberty, has no alibi and has come to that exact neighbourhood?
What, exactly, was Plan B if Tippit simply outdraws and captures his attacker, blowing the whole plot then and there?
Why don't people just stop and THINK?
Am 73 now, and at one time I had hope that the truth would be revealed before I passed on.
Which books did you recommend. It did come across on the video?
I have warched every one of these presentations given at the Allen library- and I am just 🫨. I already knew A LOT (I thought) turns out- what I knew is a raindrop in an OCEAN! Thank you Allen Public Library.
Lee Bowers saw the whole thing. He kept it secret but he told one other person. He died a suspicious death.
Rubbish, his words made it clear he say diddly squat that would threaten any "conspiracy," he didn't die until some two years after he had already testified, and his car accident was investigated by the police, the HSCA, and by researcher David Perry, none of whom found any evidence of foul play.
Like many others who could have told the truth
@@cobar5342 What "others....???"
Hum te tum tum@@aaronz7056
@@aaronz7056 3 years after the shooting 18 eyewitnesses were dead. Loydes of London said the odds of that happening were 100 trillion to one.
The Bowers headstone doesn't match birth or date of death.
I noticed that too!!!
Really? This is the first time I have heard this. Do you have a idea of the significance?
Says 1991 year of death. 1:57:04
FYI, those are Storm Drain inlet structures, not a part of the Sewer system. Storm drains flow to rivers and basins. Sewers flow to treatmemt plants or leexh fileds.
This makes the most sense to me .
You have any idea how much of this he's just making up?
@@aaronz7056 Go away bot
@@trueblue2714 Yes, I take orders from guys so paranoid they assume anybody not on board for this conspiracy paranoia must be a "bot." lol
@@aaronz7056nah probably one of those that believe anything the govt or msm sells you.
Warren commission - magic bullet? Lmfao.
@@someoneunseen5168 Yeah, we know the drill:
Any evidence points at Oswald, it's all been faked.
Any witnesses point at Oswald, they're all liars.
Any investigators point at Oswald, they're all traitors.
Any journalists point at Oswald, they're all conspirators.
Oh, and the single bullet theory makes perfect sense and is backed up by hard evidence.
I was 7 years old too. IT was 2:00PM when the news hit Florida. "They are still covering it up" That is the understatement of the year! I remember being let out of school and all the teachers were crying. I asked and was told something bad had happened. I wish I had learned early on about the Assassination. Because Cronkite said it was Oswald, no one in our home questioned it. I wish I had read Mark Lane's book. It still holds true today.
I have asked you many times to explain how some framing conspiracy was supposed to have worked in practice and you have consistently refused to answer my questions. As for Mark Lane, here is his record:
a) soundly condemned by two commissions for misleading them with conspiracy theories he wouldn't back up with evidence
b) packed his books with demonstrable fabrications
c) disgusted interview subjects with leading questions and twisting of their words
d) described by Charles Brehm as "a despicable liar" and by John Connally as "evil"
e) right-hand stooge to Rev. Jim Jones and who made no attempt to warn Leo Ryan and Jackie Speier of the deathtrap they were visiting at Jonestown, saving his own ass while they were getting gunned down at the airstrip
f) more reading that holds true today is Bob Katz's Mother Jones expose "Mark Lane - The Left's Leading Hearse Chaser..."
@@aaronz7056 I don't respond to Warren Report shills. And now you are making Lane into a Jim Jones follower? You really should just crawl into a hole somewhere. You're despicable.
@@davidarbuckle7236 You always find some desperate excuse to avoid answering direct questions, though you ALSO just sit there lecturing again and again J.D. Tippit, Ruth Paine and others were conspirators with zero evidence for any of it, which is pretty despicable conduct.
@@davidarbuckle7236 So basically you believe anything except the Warren Report---confirmation bias. lol
@@gdobie1west988 The Warren Report was NOT an Investigation, rather It was an effort to Protect LBJ's Presidency. Unless you are willing to do the leg work and seriously study the Witness Testimony, (Not the cherry-picked junk by the Warren Commission) you will never know the truth. But truthfully, the cover-up started before the Motorcade even left Love Field. The Press Truck that always was in the front of the Motorcade was moved to the back. JFK's Dr who rode in the 'bitch' seat between the two Secret Service agents was removed from the Limo. The agents who walked along and rode on the sideboards were removed, and the Patrol officers were reduced from the normal 14 to 18 to less than a half dozen. The actual cover-up started as soon as they arrived at Parkland Hospital with 3 Secret Service agents "cleaning" the Limo. (The were Sam Kinney, Landis and Ed Howard) Two of those have even admitted to finding bullets in the Limo. The final part at Parkland was muscling the body and Limo out of Parkland before a Forensic examination could be done and before an actual Autopsy could be performed. Sorry, but this was an Obvious cover-up.
All you have to do is look at the ballistics and X-rays
IF the SBT is true that it passed through two men creating seven holes and is barely distorted- more lead was removed from Connelly’s wrist than is missing from CE-399
The headshot explodes on impact leaving 42 pieces of bullet which is exactly what happens when you fire a “hollow point” bullet
Game set match
Two different bullets means two different rifles and two shooters.
Exactly. The vast majority of people have never fired a gun or know how bullets and targets behave when hit.
If people worked from fact and worked outward from that we wouldn’t still be guessing.
The truth is right in front of us but the theories that are out there are overwhelming and many just have no business being investigated.
The secret service driver did not shoot the president.
LBJ did not have anything to do with the attempt but he did want the entire mess swept under the rug because of the threat of communism and nuclear war,so we got the Warren Report which three members didn’t believe themselves
The FBI took the supposed murder weapon and took the entire rifle apart from stem to stern- no usable fingerprints found on the rifle the FBI sent it back to Dallas and suddenly there’s a partial palm print on the rifle!
There is an interesting case to be made that someone may have fired from the second floor of the Dallas Textile building or Dal Tex for short which is the building Abraham Zapruder worked in.
Zapruder and the Newmans both stated that bullets came from behind them
These are just a few of the theories that seem to have teeth,never ignore Oswald did it people rather have rationale conversations with them,
Happy hunting
All fragments found were ballistically linked to Oswald's rifle. One rifle means one shooter.
Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet.
Victims' wounds demonstrably line up on a perfect trajectory and track straight back to the sixth floor window.
Witnesses directly under that window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead.
On the other hand, no witnesses mentioned seeing or hearing any gunman operating from any other windows, or buildings.
View of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been demonstrably blocked by Kennedy's body, the same bullet has to have gone through both of them.
Bullet recovered from the stretcher is NOT "barely distorted," it is badly crushed at the nose and flattened down one side, a condition perfectly consistent with going through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling on leaving him, then broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs, as medical and forensic evidence clearly demonstrate.
That bullet was matched to Oswald's rifle.
Head shot bullet, by comparison, smashed directly into skull and exploded.
In fact, all bullet and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle.
One of the best documentaries about the possible process of killing JFK. This guy knows his stuff and can speak off the top of his head. I highly recommend taking the time to watch this video. Will need to watch several times and take notes - it’s that important.
I have watched the majority of jfk documentaries/pod casts etc but this is by far and above the most interesting and enthralling documentary I've ever listened to. So interesting and everything makes sense. Such a knowledgeable and fascinating insight. Bravo
Edwards lies his ass off, makes up huge chunks of his story, and keeps ignoring and contradicting hard evidence. He also welcomes a demonstrable liar and a notorious con artist onto the stage at the beginning.
He makes stuff up, and both ignores and flatly contradicts demonstrable evidence.
@@aaronz7056 Please explain what things have been ignored and made up
So why have we been lied to? Apparently we do not have a “ transparent “ government “FOR” the people of this glorious country.
Only guy doing the lying here is Edwards.
Dorothy Kilgallen (the reporter who atarred on the Hit TV show "What's My Line?" did investigative journalism. She's got the exclusive interview w Jack Ruby. She ended up dead of a questionable overdose (and another botched autopsy).
There is zero evidence she met with Jack Ruby. She allegedly met with him while he was in jail, but it was noted they didn’t allow media in to interview him. Especially gossip columnists from New York City. It didn’t happen and there’s not a shred of proof that it did.
I am a huge Dorothy Kilgallen fan and agree with you. She paid the ultimate price.
Shit happens!!! 😮
@jimrich4192 what an odd comment.
CIA hit no doubt,,,similar to Marilyn Monroe‘s cause of death as far as drugs go
This is an excellent presentation of how the shooting could have been plotted. There has been a lot of research put into this speech. There are some trolls here in the comments section that are spewing nonsense, they should be ignored. This presentation MAKES SENSE. Brian Edwards is a very credible researcher.
After watching this video in it's entirety, I feel the questions have been answered. This makes so much sense.
Zero evidence exists for multiple shooters.
Zero evidence exists for a knoll shooter.
Considerable evidence exists the shots all came from the sixth floor window and Oswald's rifle.
Zero evidence for this absurd pie chart of "conspirators."
Zero evidence that man pocketed any bullet, other witnesses and officers present firmly said nothing was found.
Oswald bought his rifle long before Kennedy's Texas trip was thought of and he couldn't afford a superior one.
All bullets and fragments were matched right to that rifle anyway.
Oswald didn't shoot at the limo on Houston because it would zoom past him and leave him a sitting duck for the Secret Service.
Oswald was ID'd by nearly a dozen witnesses as shooting Tippit and fleeing and the shells were matched to his revolver.
Those painted lines are quite meaningless and present on other streets anyway.
Hoffman was an unreliable witness who changed his story.
Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate 3 shots over 8-9 seconds, well within Oswald's capabilities.
Shooting was successfully recreated and would have been child's play for a trained Marine.
Bullet recovered from the stretcher is in a condition perfectly consistent with causing the victims' wounds.
Beverly Oliver is a notorious grifter, liar and con artist, but Edwards just grants her full credibility.
If I was in charge of the SS I would make it mandatory to listen to this guy I would have this guy speak DIRECTLY to the SS. Not just before Dallas but their first day on the job.
Mandatory to listen to a guy who thinks Beverly Oliver is a credible witness....?