Keep Your Old Laptop Running With This ...
Vložit
- čas přidán 8. 05. 2024
- ► Follow me!
𝕏 ►► x.com/@MichaelNROH
📷 Instagram ►► / @michaelnroh
🤖 Discord ►► / discord
#️ Matrix ►► matrix.to/#/#michaelnr0h-community:matrix.org
▶️ Second Channel ►► / nr0hofficial
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Links:
Download ZorinOS ►► zorin.com/os/
Balena Etcher ►► etcher.balena.io/
Camera ►► amzn.to/3O8aHh2 (With Default Lens)
Microphone ►► amzn.to/3xwznsl
Scarlett 2i2 ►► a.co/d/gxQ2Wr4
(* All Amazon Links are affiliated. That means that I get a small cut of revenue if you buy something, without any additional costs.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
🎵 Music from StreamBeats by Harris Heller.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapters:
00:00 - Tired of upgrading your Laptop?
00:49 - No more Windows updates and poor performance?
01:25 - Meet ZorinOS Lite
02:22 - How to install ZorinOS
04:15 - Linux is not Windows!
05:09 - How does ZorinOS Lite compare to Windows?
07:00 - Conclusion
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Description Tags:
how to speed up windows 10 laptop, how to speed up old laptop, how to speed up old laptop windows 10, how to speed up old laptop windows 7, zorin os lite review, zorin os lite on old pc,zorin os lite vs zorin os, linux vs windows on old laptop, old pc linux vs windows, linux vs windows, old laptop is slow, old laptop very slow, my old laptop is very slow
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#linux #tipsandtricks #opensource - Hry
*old laptop exists in the house*
Me: "It's a Linux server now!"
Me: *Has an HP Omen 15 laptop with a Nvidia GPU, 16GB of RAM and 1TB of storage*
Also me: Look at who has a new Jellyfin Media Server and Backup storage on Fedora Server
Ubunte discontinued its 32-bit support last month. So if you're running a pentium4 or something older, you might revert to Debian etc. Though I'm still getting kernel updates on Bionic 18.04, those will likely subside shortly. Most of my systems are 64-bit now. My music editing and jukebox systems are pentium4 and pentium3. They sill work, so I keep them running off-network.
Yeah, but 32 bit systems might not be worth reving anyway. Even software is increasingly only supporting 64 bit.
Most applications still work, or they wouldn't be in the repository. The strange one was chromium browser. It installed just fine, but wouldn't work because the system has only SSE2.
@@MichaelNROH 32bit CPUs like Intel Core Duo are still quite usable for light web browsing etc. They are a lot more powerful than the Atom N450 in the video
Actually, pentium 4 has x64 versions
@@0xC4aE1e5 It does but they are mostly for LGA775. 64-bit CPUs for the older PGA478 socket are rare and don't work on all boards
Needed a video like this. Keep it up 👍
Old is relative. Best thing things for an old acquisition is an SSD, then more RAM, then LMDE 5 which is still available in 32-bit should you need e.g. Lenovo T-62, bought dirt cheap, loaded with LMDE 32-bit and passed to a friend. His comment was "I can't believe how easy this is to use!" That just makes my day, grin. Did the same upgrades for my old Lenovo T-500, except 64-bit. Real happy with that I am, having installed Caliber and the Baen Free Library set. Keep smiling, we're brothers in habits we are.
I'm running Puppy Linux on an Acer Aspire One (year 2010 model, 32-bit, 1GHz CPU, 2GB RAM). Works pretty well as long as I keep the browser updated. Some websites are slow, but offline software runs smoothly.
This was the best advice regarding computers ive had in a while. My old laptop (Acer Aspire e5-751g from 2014) runs Zorin Lite 16 very smooth. Using a HDMI cable, I finally have a 'smart tv' without having to un- and replug my work laptop
Cool video! I was going to wrote a long comment about how this and my experience but I'm tired so Ill do it later maybe. can't wait for the new sets!
I had been waiting for quite some time for you to talk about Zorin Os. Thank you!
there's a "lite" version too 17.1...works beautifully
You can also upgrade the 1GB of Memory to 2GB (and some Aspire One models you can upgrade to 4GB) and the HDD can be upgraded to a SSD to increase the speed. FYI
I recommend everyone to test drive a bunch of them in a VM or as a live CD.
I personally prefer Linux lite over Zorin. It just a better feel for me.
It's great to have all the options to pick what we like. 😊
IMHO its better to not test them in VM's but on your hardware using Live CD
That's also a solid choice.
I do it usually as the second step.
First check it in a VM to see wether or not it feels right, then on bare metal to see potential issues and then install it. Also you can install it alongside your previous OS to keep one foot in the door in case something important does not work or performers badly. That's how I roll for my one and only computer.
But then of course you have to clean up grub afterwards.
There are a thousand options. And I get it why this is sometimes perceived as bad by new users.
@@wombatdkjust livecd
idk basic features like touchpad w/ gestures, brightness control, network etc work pretty well, the problems start to occur when you want to go deeper (mainly power control, honestly) or if you're using wm without a de (but then you're probably techsavvy enough to configure it yourself)
Mm... Linux lite is solid, but Zorin I feel it perfect for new users and HW usage.
@@ShadowPriestBear pick your flavor.
I also recommend ventoy.
You install it on a stick, you put bare iso's on it and you can choose the iso to load during boot. Very convenient. All iso's on on single stick ready to boot windows, a rescue os, debían, arch manjaro and much more.
But if you have an even older machine, I'd recommend Q4OS. It's packaged with bare naked Debian, and Trinity desktop, previously known as KDE 3. It "just works", as the cool kids would say
Don't try it if you are planning to use another monitor
I've never used Belana etcher but I know people recommend it. For anybody interested - the Fedora media writer is really good and it will even write Fedora to a USB, whilst being downloaded and you can tell it to either save the download or delete it when it is finished.
I feel like the hardware would be a bit *too* slow for my use, but it would be PERFECT for a loved one as a data backup. Put something like OMV/Casa to run headless, put it in a corner next to the router and voila. It can backup my mum's photos and important files. Add a tunnel to maintain remotely.
I use an Atom N270 netbook as a pi-hole server running on linux, upgraded to 2GB RAM. No noise, low power, and the machine is not going to waste!
when i used zorin it introduced a 2 year old bug that everyone knew about because it was in ubuntu but they introduced anyway and it essentially made every app timeout for like a minute before opening, and because they have a horribly slow release cycle I was stuck with it lmao. that's the problem with these ubuntu based distros that only have a couple of custom themes and backgrounds.
I have quite a lot of experience installing Linux on old computers. Sometimes it works really well and you can use your computer for many things with much more comfort. Unfortunately, sometimes not. It happens that Linux consumes less resources, but in reality it does not work faster because of a crappy video driver or something. But with a little creativity, you can always come up with something interesting.
This is very true. I tried two different distros on an old HP laptop. And although it started getting more and more crappy under windows, none of the distros I have tried (Mint and Pop_OS) improved it and even introduced new problems... Now I'm trying to turn it into a home server with Fedora Server, as it has a large HDD.
@@kondrik3777 Pop_OS by default uses gnome-based graphical shell that can hardly be called lightweight. Mint has a version with xfce, which works a little better (but you may have tried cinnamon, which is somewhere in between). I've had good results with debian+xfce, but it's highly hardware dependent. In the sense that if you only have a basic driver working without any acceleration, it can really work badly. I also had glitches and what looks like a memory leak with lxde on some computers.
@@kote315 precisely. Mint Cinnamon was the first distro I wanted to switch from W10 to. And yes, I discovered that there are more lightweight distros, when I later dug deeper into the Linux rabbit hole 😆 I'll see how my home server project turns out, and then maybe I'll try the xfce version of Mint.
I can confirm this.. My media streaming pc suffers with playback stream i am not sure what it is but it does, like i get uStutters of notorious 1fps or something.. That or screen tearing.. Lots of it. Issues that on windows don't happen, still i use linux there for convenience, being faster and for the use case it rather much more be linux.
Thanks Michael, another great video! Zorin OS is a great distribution, love LINUX! (I only discover your second channel👍😎) See you soon bro. 👋
peppermint is a hell of a light more lightweight
however zorin is a good start and since its based on ubuntu alot easier to google help
peppermint is based on debian and has slight differences that a new user would end up getting confused on
I realized halfway that I had this laptop! Of course, mine is red and 32bit, so you can't blame me.
I was planning on either Debian or Alpine, and installing KDE (the minimal version) after installing it because its on Windows 8 and runs fairly well. I just don't like how long it takes to find apps that are 32 bit compatible, so its a fresh feeling to use either snap, flatpak or even apt.
you kinda missed one important features of Zorin OS here, which is it have warning when user run an .exe file and prompt them to use WINE do they can run it.
it is a very significant feature it have baked in, which the target audience of this video probably need but don't have the knowledge of
great video as always man!
I originally wrote down that ZorinOS came with Wine installed, which is actually not the case, so I cut out the Wine parts entirely. Kind of overlooked the fact that it was only a prompt when writing down my notes.
I've Grown very attached to Mint since the beginning, but I always download the newest Xorin when a new release comes out.
Occasionally I'll give it a shot on a spare system in the pile, but I usually revert to Mint or Lubuntu
Which are both good choices as well
@@MichaelNROH It could just be personal Bias;
But Zorin Lite just seems to Bog down more resources. I try to bring back some oooold machines that probably have to true purpose at this point lol
Linux mint cinnamon 64bit still feels faster and snappier and takes less ram.
Tested on my acer aspire one 725 netbook with 2GB ram with a slow hard drive. (Ony window 8.1 feels as fast)
Zorin was slower.
I would recommend it on a core i3 or better witth 4gb ram
I use zorin on a older machine with nvidia gpu. it is definitely the preferred Linux distro for me.
you helped me another time thank so much for your help you helped me to recycle my old toshiba sattelite c660 you're the best linux youtuber 😁
ZorinOS is awesome! I have been using it for years and it never gave me problems.
4:40 "hopefully" 😂
Professional... I really enjoyed your video. 😊😊😊
Thank you 😃
Zorin is great, but I also have the same laptop, and I'm running PeppermintOS, which is my favourite lightweight distro.
However, the hardware is so bad on this netbook that you can't expect to run Facebook or CZcams, so I'm using it as a file and print server
In a drawer of my office desk at work I also still keep buried exactly such an Acer Aspire One that I used to plug into the GSP's serial console port of the HP PA-RISC rp5410 (Matterhorn?) whenever I needed to visit our data center to rescue one of the hpux servers I used to administer.
I think the last update I installed on my little Aspire One was some Fedora release before they ditched i386 32bit support.
Due to restructering of my department I no longer have the need nor access to the DC and the HP PA-RISC stuff was decommissioned a while ago and the DBs and Apps that ran on it were migrated to Linux on more commodity-like HW.
Your video reminded me of my little lightweight rescue tool and inspired me to revive it.
I once came across the BunsenLabs distro which I found quite appealing.
Do you think this distro would be suited for this little old netbook?
I think I should give it a try.
Hey I have an ACER Aspire One ZG5 model too, what did you end up using on it ? Can we get it to at least run youtube ?
I have an hp stream laptop, and honestly because the keyboard is excellent, it would make a good free-$30 writing laptop. the battery life is excellent (6 hours from a 2013 laptop) and it's probably so good because people don't want to use it.
it's 10 years old and it can't even run windows, it barely ran brand new, but linux mint runs like a dream, minus the web browser being slow for obvious reasons (2gb ram)
To the people who is gonna thy this , with low spec the Zorin is not a good OS i tried but its more laggy and choppy
then what do you recommend for me?
I´m very glad to see more Zorin OS videos. I have a 15 years old PC (intel quad core q9400 and 4gb ram) with Zorin OS lite and this is the best OS I installed and actually using with no lag or freezing.
Zorin OS 16 is excellent. I would switch to it if I could get specific programs on Linux. I am one of those people who need help to use alternatives to existing programs.
In xfce you'd want to disable compositor and got additional performance
Ventoy.
You should not install something other than ArchLinux on these old laptops, arch is so fast and you'll have much better performance than other distros trust me! And don't listen to others saying it's hard to install coz `archinstall` is at your finger tips!
Arch is alright but it can't beat a purposely scaled-down Linux distro for such old hardware like AntiX in terms of performance. For the sort of hardware shown in the video, to try to use anything other than AntiX, Puppy, Linux Lite, Slax, etc. is nothing short of masochism.
@@RogerioPereiradaSilva77 well antix is just debian and icewm, so you can basically install arch and icewm ontop and have a more performance and a super lightweight system that nothing can beat! But ya ofc Antix is much more user friendly than what i just said
Lubuntu uses even less ram, while still user friendly. XFCE got a bit fat in these days... For a PC that bad, every little bit counts :)
Good video btw.
lit video as per usual :)
I have used many Linux distros, in fact I kinda like Linux, but I just prefer Windows and MacOS.
Hey Michael. I've tried Zorin Lite on three different laptops, and have had issues with all of them. I can't understand why, as it is lightweight yet modern. The interface is beautiful, to be sure, and it has great features. But my three issues were; on a relatively new Acer laptop, the keyboard started to malfunction, and at about the same time, the touchpad stopped working, on my old HP elitebook, the download speeds from the software manager were abysmal, and on my old macbook, the wifi wouldn't connect (which happened in Pop! os anyway, so Zorin might be off the hook there). I made another bootable disc, in case the first one was faulty, and it made no difference. Three laptops, two different discs, multiple installations, an os that has great reviews, and I get issues every time. Maybe you can give me some clues, because I would like to make Zorin work. It's worth noting that all three laptops run Linux Mint Cinnamon 20.1 perfectly fine. The Acer runs Cinnamon, Ubuntu, and Pop! os with no issues, and I can't get Ubuntu to properly install on the HP, but Mint gives it a second life.
hi mate, i am a beginner in this matter. I have an old laptop Asus TP200s and i want to know which linux distro is compatible with this laptop. My old laptop only have 2gb ram. Please advise. thank you.
@@jrkinabalu99 Mint Cinnamon is the easiest I have found to use, and the most versatile in that it installs on pretty much anything, old or new. For older computers, I hear a lot about Centos. Linux in general is lightweight, so it probably won't which distro you choose, as long as it installs. Bear in mind, my experience is only with Mint Cinnamon, Ubuntu 20.1, Pop!os, Elementary, and lately, Zorin Lite, and I can only speak with confidence for what I've tried. I still believe Linux Mint Cinnamon is the best out of everything I've used. It's been my daily driver, more or less, for three years. I love it, and it runs quite well on my old HP Elitebook 8560p (for some reason Ubuntu failed to install properly on it, but would probably run OK if it installed). I have Zorin Lite on it now, and it seems smooth, too, though I still prefer Cinnamon because the native software centre for Zorin seems buggy, at least for now. I would push yuou to Mint Cinnamon, or Mint Mate, if your computer is too old for Cinnamon to run well.
Thank u for leaving this comment. With this I found that I can try Mint Cinnamon if Zorin Lite doesn't work on my old Thinkpad. Thanks!
@@zerocal76 I have found Zorin is better if you want to play old windows games because of the preinstalled graphics. That's just something you might want to keep in mind.
This is nice. I have a 4gb ram 2nd gen i3 rocking laptop collectingg dust somewhere. Which version would syit that better? This one in lite or some other distro idk thanks tho
With 4Gb you can probably already go for the Core version, but you just need to test it
Too bad Zorin OS does NOT have a 32 bit release! If you are looking for something for an older system that is 32 bit such as many of the old netbooks, I would suggest Debian 32 bit MATE release. I have it working on a Dell Inspiron MINI 10 with an Intel Atom Z520 cpu and 1 GB of ram and it runs great.
So far I have success using rasbian on a old couple of laptops with the same specs. I am worry about other distro ditching the 32bits support
Oh, that will happen for sure. Even if the distros were still to support it, what good would it be if no applications do?
64 Bit with all of it's advantages only causes the developers to put in more effort to make a 32 Bit version as well (or built it first and add bit address support later)
Ah yes, Zorin OS, I tried that some time ago. While I do think it's a good version of Linux, the problem with Linux is that so much of my software that I use is Windows only. Trying to find Linux equivalents of most of those has been futile and trying to run them though WINE has gone form partially working do just flat out doesn't work. If it wasn't for this ONE hurdle, I would have switched to Linux years ago. If only Windows was more like this in the way of being free from crap like Linux is.
Bionicpup IS thé best , 300mb needed for installation and 300mb of ram IS recommanded, and it's based on Ubuntu 18.04 and it supports 64bit and 32 bit version and cpus with some tweaks it's the best choice for gaming and web and prodectivity , it's thé way to go 8f you have a low end pc
i never try yet but alpine as a desktop makes more sense, i dont know why some "elite" people say zorin os is not good for the linux community, maybe in they policy? idk i never use zorinOS.
I will say that the AUR has completely spoiled me on installing software. Developed several bad practices from that.
yea i have an old laptop and win 10 on it but its slow, games run fine (older games) but the operating system is a bit sluggish, and well maybe only the older HDD and probably with switching to a SSD would solve this issue, but why bother if i could go with this. Once i tried POP OS, but i dont know, wasnt a fan but it was some years back so maybe its better now. But first it was weird a bit, but as i got more familiar it well kinda felt like windows with things done differently, but anyway. I heard about Zorin etc. and probably just probably will give this a try with my odler laptop, but im really struggling cause i mostly use it for old games and or older games those that run great on it, but with Zorin i dont know if i will be able to run them. Maybe ill just wing it and whatever. Its not like its hard to install and reinstall an OS, i just really dont like doing it. Yet when win xp era around that time i loved reinstalling everything and it felt satisfying having a fresh install of everything, but as years went by and i got older i got more well lazy i guess, and now i really hate it, but that doesnt mean i dont know how and what to do, jsut that i hate it :).
Anyway, good suggestion and well i think illl buy a SSD and clean install on it, that will be the best i guess.
Getting an SSD is the first step to upgrading a "slow" laptop, regardless of the operating system. It is also especially important for low RAM machines, since when it is full, some stuff gets offloaded to the main drive. The faster it is, the more responsive the system
Can you test Antix on same laptop, please?
My pc is still on windows 11 21H2 and i only get driver updates
Thank goodness for Linux!
0:08 Don't forget if microsoft randomly decides to introduce useless "security" features that don't even make it more secure.
I installed Zorin Lite but online video streaming hangs after few mins and there is no voice either. Can you help me?
just instaled on a older pc i have here (a little bit better than yours) and this zorin lite runs much slower than windows 7
Could you please confirm if VMware available in Zorin OS?
I was so sad when one day Linux stopped working on my laptop from 2005. I put FreeBSD on it and it started working again
Is it a 32 bit system?
@@MichaelNROH it’s 64 bit
Good video.
I would have used Mint XFCE or MX instead personally
Agreed. I installed ZorinOS on my daughters all-in-one HP. The performance was fine, but the look and feel of the DE just did not compare well with LM running the Cinnamon DE.
That's fine.
My personal choices would also be different, but it is easy.
@@MichaelNROH Completely agree with the ease of installation. At the time my daughter did not have any experience using a PC, be it Windows or Linux. I had just heard about ZorinOS and figured I'd give it a shot. Install and initial configuration was a breeze. As for resource usage, it was great. But after a while I started to notice that some of the DE customization options found in Cinnamon were missing. It was a bunch of little things that I missed that started to annoy me.
lol i have same laptop
What about arch/debian/etc + dwm/i3/bspwm/etc? 😅
Good 👍
I have a very old slow laptop with AMD E450 APU, 4gb RAM & 250gb harddisk. Which Linux Distro should in install? I have installed Linux Mint XFCE onit on it. I want more light distro. Should I try Lubuntu or Zorin OS Lite?
Debian 11 XFCE? What about AntiX Linux?
I like Linux more than Windows anyday.
Them forcing us to get a subscription service every month is ridiculous and wrong.
This should be a choice.
My old laptop overheated and when the corner is bumped, it’ll just freeze and graphical artifacts will appear. If it’s bumped again, more artifacts, and it stays frozen. I would love to do this, but the laptop is just unusable now.
If this is a video subsystem problem, you can try using Linux without a GUI. It's also possible that it's a RAM issue (especially if you have a graphics "card" integrated into the processor), in which case you can test and replace it (unless it's soldered to the board, of course). If the processor is defective, the repair will be unprofitable.
@@kote315Yeah, the processor has Intel graphics inside. I opened it up before, reseated the RAM, and the issues are still there.
Can you install this on an Acer Aspire One ZG5 model with 1.5Gb of Vram and a 32bit processor? Will it be able to use youtube at least?With an AD blocker?
The current 32-Bit variant of ZorinOS will drop support on the 31st of May, and I don't think there will be a successor.
32 Bit systems which actually have a 32 Bit architecture are fading out of existence since with the hardware standard being so high, many applications drop support as well.
Please don't compare Windows and Linux by looking to the Memory usage graphs. Windows will use much more memory when the hardware allows it and will try to shrink itself to the minimums otherwise. But 1 Gb of RAM is really small amount for Windows newer than XP.
My Linux system boots to 210MB RAM (out of 32GB), it use free memory to cache disk. Linux felt much leaner than Windows XP, it was obvious by how much Windows swap on the same task.
I'm using Custom Windows 11 like Ghost Spectre & Revision OS which are very very lightweight bloatware free Win11 and i used to hate Win11 before but now I'm loving it .... Linux is shit, I tried Linux and i got Headache due to it .... Linux is only for Hackers not for general public .... RevisionOS is working like butter in my 6 year old laptop .....
I can get my windows 10 down to 1.2GB ram usage before.
Startup?
Bro never show us how it work on browser
Loc- OS Linux is more light
Sorry i v have tried it in a more capable laptop an still don't work as expected. f course the free version.......
Why just old PCs why not all PCs. You can do everything in linux including gaming now.
I mean from the overall experience, I wouldn't go all in for the most lightweigt distro's.
In regards to Zorin OS, the better choice there would be the Core edition.
wathing this on a 15 year old laptop
I get that "get more life out of your old computers" is an entirely valid usecase for linux, but, the more I see it (especially now) the more I have to ask, is this actually how we should be advertising linux? It's a valid usecase sure, but if someone has an old computer they're already not using, how likely is it that when they do get it to a vaguely usable state (linux may be great, but it can't work miracles, bad hardware is still not going to be a pleasant experience) they're actually going to do anything with it?
It just sort of feels like advertising a car by how good it's air conditioning is, it might not be wrong, but is someone really going to sell their old car on the basis of slightly better air conditioning? I feel like the "revitalize your old hardware" thing only applies to techies who already know about linux and have uses for old hardware, but for average users, I'm really not sure if it actually matters to them that much.
On the other hand, due to the unreasonably high system requirements of Windows 11, many people are trying to find an alternative. There are a lot of people who think "Why the hell should I buy a new compatible computer? The performance of a 10-year-old PC is enough for me. After the upgrade, I will not get anything revolutionary new, only the ability to run newer programs and alll these security-patch-things. Why pay more?"
@@kote315 thats an entirely different discussion. Those are working, high-spec machines. They run windows fine, you don't need more PERFORMANCE, you need security updates and support.
@@dreaper5813 jesus christ always back to fucking E-waste with you people. Frankly, no, computers with sub 2ghz processors just ARE ewaste at this point. Installing linux on them doesn't fix that, they're just old hardware. They can't run anything most people want to run on them, and frankly finding and distributing such systems to people who COULD get use out of them, would almost certainly end up hurting the planet more as you have to ship several pounds of mass across the world for a solution that's worse than a proxmox VM.
Notice, people were willing to sell their old machines for cheap to your boss, precisely BECAUSE they had no use for them. Also, as I mentioned in the other reply, you haven't actually said those machines were in need of more performance to begin with. You need to factory wipe machines before reselling them anyway, frankly it seems far more likely linux was just a way to do that quickly and easily without having to deal with potential windows licensing complications. Not to mention linux installs faster and is generally a better experience. Nothing you've said has anything to do with eeking out more performance of the old systems, and frankly based on your noticably indirect phrasing, I'm guessing you have no evidence to suggest that's why it was done either, meaning you know your story is irrelevant.
My point is about marketing linux to average users as revitalizing their old systems. Systems which they have no use for to begin with, otherwise they'd still be using them, and systems which - irrelevant of the OS - are too out of date to be comfortably used since software, websites, etc. have all also gotten more computationally intensive. Linux is a couple % faster than windows sure, but realistically a couple of % won't take a system from unusable to usable, it'll just make the unbearable mildly more bearable. Unless we're talking about a system with 2-4gb of ram (which, again, already won't be capable enough for comfortable day to day use on linux or not) the 1-2gb of ram saved by linux is unlikely to significantly change the performance of a system to the point of getting new use out of it as an average user.
It's like an ant, sure, on weak machines linux can lift a lot more than it's own bodyweight, but it still isn't lifting much. Linux may reduce the RAM usage by 40% compared to windows, but the OS isn't what's using the most RAM to begin with. It's an improvement sure, but it's not going to be what takes a system so old you stopped using it and make it perform well enough that the average user will start using it again. Ants lifting so much more than their own body weight is impressive sure, but realistically, they still aren't lifting that much. Just the same, linux saving 40% of the memory compared to windows is impressive sure, but it's still only saving a gigabyte or two. These machine still might have some use, but an average user won't have a use for them. (and again, shipping them around to try to find someone who does is almost certainly going to hurt the planet far more)
@@robonator2945 But if you do install Windows 11 (it's not that hard to get around the artificial limits), you'll find that you now do need more performance, as your computer is no longer busy with the work tasks that you need, but constantly searching for updates, collecting telemetry, showing ads and doing Bill Gates knows what else. So you will be forced to install a more powerful processor, memory and SSD, despite the fact that everything worked quite well in Windows 7. Or you can install Linux and use this computer for a few more years.
@@kote315 yeah that's just flat out wrong. I DID upgrade to windows 11, and the experience isn't significantly different to windows 10. The simple reality is, the spyware has been in windows for ages already, and most of that doesn't actually impact performance. It CAN impact responsiveness slightly, but windows has been highly optimized so that it doesn't pose a performance issue. If it truly were as simple as "install linux and get 20% more performance" then everyone already would have. Linux's peformance benefits are present, but they're nowhere near as clear cut or large enough to matter for most average user usecases.
The times when linux DOES notably perform better, it's almost always a result of implementation rather than general optimization. For instance factorio IIRC was able to asyncrhonously save on it's linux version, but couldn't on it's windows version. That meant on the windows version you would get a hitch everytime it saved, and on the linux version you wouldn't. While linux does perform differently in that case, it's not because windows has more spyware that slowed it down, it's because a specific feature was present on one OS and not the other. If we're factoring that as "performance" though then we also have to give Windows credit for all the shit it can do that linux can't, notably HDR.
There IS a performance difference, but for the VAST majority of usecases it's a "oh that's kind of nice it's a tad faster" situation; it won't make an unusable computer suddenly super nice to use. And, again, if it's an old computer you don't use anyway, then being slightly less shit than it currently is won't mean you have a use for it. You already made due without it, and it's still bad, it's just less bad than it was. Is your average user going to go out of their way to find a new use for a computer that's still a slow piece of shit, just because it's a slightly less slow piece of shit than it was before? A techie might have a use for shitty computers sure, but a techie already knows about linux; they don't have to be convinced to use it. Will the AVERAGE user get anything out of a slightly less piece of shit computer?
can i install zorin os core on my laptop with core i5 4th gen and 2gb ram
Probably
@@MichaelNROH not lite version the core version
@@akshithj7857 Still probably. It's within the minimal specs as long as it's a 64 Bit gpu.
The performance will not be good, but any modern application will run into memory bottlenecks nowadays
I think AntiX is much better for this laptop.
This is an absolutely great guide for anyone interested in reviving that old hardware and Zorin OS is a great choice! I recently did a video detailing why the latest version of Zorin is such a great option. czcams.com/video/mSEIOyAME4E/video.html
antiX
Can i play games