I’m from America & I don’t think Mr. Rashid remembers me but 7 mos. ago I came to these Muslim channels ( never met a Muslim) & on his channel I noticed how kind he was to Christians so I left a kind message never thinking he would answer me back, he did & welcomed me to his channel. Two days ago I took my Shahada & it is because of this wonderful man I am a Muslim today. Could someone tell him that I thank him this girl who was taught not to trust a Muslim. Ty❤️
May beloved sister, you have put a big smile on my face today. I am honoured to learn that you have accepted the religion our Creator has chosen for us. May Allah bless you always and take you from strength to strength. Thank you for reaching out and I want you to remember me (and family) in prayers. Please do plead with Allah to forgive my errors and save me from his displeasure. I also advise you to strengthen your knowledge and practice. Please visit www.onereason.org for helpful information for new Muslims. Allah bless you and make your path to paradise easy, ameen. Wassalam. Adnan. P.S: see also newmuslim.iera.org/
@@MrAdnanRashid I shall certainly pray for you and your family especially your son Musa who looks just like you and he also follows you in his love of God. Your son is a joy to watch so kind to others too.❤️
Free Balochistan😔😔 Pakistan stop kidnapped and killed innocent Muslim Brothers Sisters😔 all innocent family😔 May Allah protect innocent family😔 in Pakistan
Machaallah. Are you preparing and memorizing your talking points before delivering a detailed and precise lecture like this? May Allah increase your and our knowledge.
Exemplary! A humble request that plz translate your lecture into Urdu as well. The reason is that Many understand Urdu in pak and india and if they listen to your lectures this will be a life changer for them bcz still a huge chunk of Muslims are doing heresy.
Free Balochistan😔😔😔 Pakistan stop kidnapped and killed innocent Muslim Brothers Sisters😔 all innocent family😔 May Allah protect innocent family😔 in Pakistan
Thanks to Ahle Hadis, people in Bangladesh now know what bedat is , what are shirk and kufr . And we now know that There are weak and fake Hadiths . Before that people didn't know hadis can be faked or weak . The work of ahle hadis are beneficial for the ummah , Alhamdulillah . People now are more aware of the shirk , bedat and kufr . And now many people are following the sahih sunnah/hadis .
Free Balochistan😔😔😔 Pakistan stop kidnapped and killed innocent Muslim Brothers Sisters😔 all innocent family😔 May Allah protect innocent family😔 in Pakistan
52:20 that man was also a scholar n class fellow of shah Waliullah. His name was za'ir Allahabadi. Y'all should listen to Shaykh Zafarul Hassan's lecture taqwiyatul iman. It has more detailed info about ahlul hadith in India
Is there any urdu books that you could recommend that i can get my family in pakistan to read they follow the sufi islam and distrust the hadith. They love Ali ibn uthman hajwari.
Free Balochistan😔😔 Pakistan stop kidnapped and killed innocent Muslim Brothers Sisters😔😔all innocent family😔😔 May Allah protect innocent family😔😔in Pakistan
Ahle Hadis of the subcontinent and ahlal hadith are world's apart. There is no similarity between the former and ahlus sunnah (ahlal hadith who are from ahlus sunnah). The former are ahlal biddah. The ahlal hadith actually collect information that they believe is from or they attribute it to the Prophet (peace be upon him), although their kutub have other than that in them as well so hadith or kutub of hadith aren't restrictive at least. Your definition of sunnah is also off, but I don't have time to correct it, brother.
I have a question brother adnan Rashid some people say Mohammad bin qasim was hanafi muqalid is it true if not then what were they and how they were praying in hanfi style or in the way mentioned by rasoolallah sallallahu alaihi wasallam.......? My second question is some people say ahlulhadith were agents of British empire is it true?
Check the birth date of abu hanifa and muhammad bin qasim. It is not possible for muhamad bin qasim to be hanafi.You also have to know that it was the turks who spread the hanafi fiqh. Most persians in iran even today are shafi.
@@alphauno6614 If you are addressing me, then I will answer it. Yes it is a valid school of thought and follows the sunnah but that does not negate what I said above. Also this fact does not make hanafi school of thought superior or inferior to others. On the other hand, these types of stories e.g. Muhammad bin Qasim is hanafi, shows that there is an undertone of differentiation amongst hanafi of south asia.
Summarzing this video for you: Look look Abu hanifa, Malik, Shafi'i Ahmed ibn Hambal didn't understood hadith but our layman( who does basically tarjeeh) of late 17-18th century did. Look look hanafis and Shafi'i in subcontinent never spoke against bow down to grave and dancing musics etc later some layman come and taught them hadiths. Look how cool and madness of la Madhiabism is. (La Madhiabism who follow scholars and don't go debunking other layman of Ahlul Sunnah is accepted incontext to fiQh)
The fact that the kingdoms were run on this fiqs shows its strength, Its funny how the Ahle hadith u are advocating dont even have their own fiq, they study Hanafi fiq and say wht not to follow, i have watched many of your lectures but this is not your territory, you do what u do best, leave this topic to the ulemas, there are loops in almost everything you have said on this topic
Hanafi, Safi', Maliki and Handball are all schools of Fiqh. That's what they excel in. You do make a good point and what Adnan said is also valid. The schools of Fiqh should produce more Ahadith experts so they can weed out any few problems here and there. Allah knows best
The issue is that Hadith should also have passed down through ijma and tawatur just like Quran! We shouldn’t be needing anyone’s research and investigation in regards of the religion!
And you think sahih Hadith are not by ijma ? Go and learn some ilm al Hadith and how did Muslim scholars criticize questionable hadiths and their concern for the truth
Free Balochistan😔 Pakistan stop kidnapped and killed innocent Muslim Brothers Sisters😔😔all innocent family😔😔 May Allah protect innocent family😔 in Pakistan
you are too naïve. Allah has not taken a guarantee of hadith like for quran. And it is easy to corrupt books of hadith. thats whywe need a proper research on its authenticity
@babahadjimohamed9339 There's no ijma on sahi. It's a standard that varies between the aimah of hadith and it is also khabr ahad. There are hadith that have tawatar, but they are few and far.
its not as if the madhabs aren't going back to the Quran and sunnah. You realize the bulk of the differences of opinion among the madhabs go back to the sahabah themselves, and these are minor differences. We as lay Muslims cannot do the research ourselves and start coming up with our own fatwahs and start deriving Islamic rulings. This is why we rely on madhabs and by the way the madhabs were among the early generations of Muslims themselves if they differed their differences are minor and they back to the sahabah themselves. If you say were not going to follow a madhab and go back to the Quran and sunnah directly you end up creating your own madhab as well and if you try deriving rulings yourself you will be held accountable on the day of judgement for the mistakes you make. What I feel is that as a lay Muslim rather than doing your own research better just follow a madhab for more clarity. Quran 17:36 "do not speak up for what you have no knowledge over". Another verse in which it says "So ask the people of knowledge if you do not know" Quran 16:43. These verses show us that we cannot do ijtehaad ourselves.
When u mentioned a point in regards to fatiha, there is hadith and also mention in quran for people to follow an imam, Also about the point u made in regards to self study, is everyone capable enough to do his own study and understanding of Quran and Bukhari ? if people start doing that we would have a millions school of thoghts from the present day 4 i suppose, The fiq these 4 renowned schools of thoughts have, arent these derived from the quran and the Hadith? You said when Mohammed Qasim came by Abu Hanifa was 12, he had access to the most knowledgeable people if he has any access to the people you have spoken about, i really love and appreciate the knowledge u hold but do not propagate self study or make it sound so simple, if u have to go to an imam today , why not go to imams who have established fiqa centuries ago close to the origin of islam ? There have been some corrections that have been made by Imam Mohammad and Imam Yusuf, its actually these 3 who are involved in Hanafi fiqa, if the people have sufi inclinations than balme the people why blame the school of thoughts which have been such a unifying force for centuries, its simply a myth that people will come under one roof, they will have a million more thought of schools, if u let this to the whips of people, Am open to understanding this concept but the points you made in regards to other fiqs and self study somehow doesn seem real
You're definitely right. From this lecture the lesson I've learnt is that Muslims in the hanafi madhab (and others I presume) should have a greater focus on Adhadith. This is totally reasonable. You can specialise to become a muhadith if you go through these institutions as far as I know. There was no criticism of the underlying foundation of the hanafi madhab.
It's is the saying of mohammed saw we must follow. As per hadith when sahaba was following imam and praying and reading every word that mohammed saw said he asked to stop doing it and read only surah fatiha. Please let me know if you need hadith number Insha'allah i will present it. May Allah accept us
Even Sheikh Albani(r.a)(todays Ahlul real hadith) said their is no need of reciting faitha behind imam in loud prayer. Sheikh Fawzan has refuated this really badly and even hadith on chest How much baised and Ignorant you are fear Allah. May Allah humiliated the people who has hatered against Madhiab of Salaf. May Allah give victory to the people of Madhiab of Salaf the true Alhul hadith not a sect of sub-continent.
Brother calm down. Your information in the beginning was very informative but then you got crazy. Please have some decorum. Was this the akhlaq wal adab of our Nabi Muhammed sallalahualayhiwasalam? May Allah guide us to the righteous path.
Ignorant trying to mixing Alhul hadith of Salaf to today sect which is nothing but la Madhiab layman and among them are todya Mirza Ali(who say he will raise sword against Movayia and many evil and nonsense) who does tarjeeh which is not permissible as imam Ahmed said atleast 3-4million hadith are memorization is required for someone to do Ijthad and Ahmed himself memorized 1 million hadith Mujthaid Mutalq and Madhiab are just based on mujthaideen mutalq rather after them serious of scholars who studied Quran and hadith and fiq. He is trying to show like Shafii and hanfias don't have any idea of Hadith then someone taught them something like this nonsense.
@@Yoyo-dx8wzWho cares we just follow the Quran and Sunnah rather than your self made and imposed fiqhs, show proof from Quran or from the prophet that we need to blindly follow any of these four fikhs (nearly sects)
@@abcdefg98138 you subcontinent people follow the Quran and Hadith according to your own understanding which leads to deviance we follow according to Mujthadeen's I don't have to give as scholars have already go and watch Sheikh Fawzan. No scholar ever state Madhiab are sect rather a layman for subcontient that's how you guyz head toward deviance
Good lecture but a slight bias and intellectual dishonesty was evident during parts of the lecture. Additionally, please differentiate between the Ahl Ul Hadith of the past and the Ahl ul Hadith sect in the subcontinent. The Ahl ul Hadith of the past were muhaddithūn (scholars of Hadith) and Ahl e Hadith of the subcontinent today are a sect not upon the truth, they’re like the pervezi sect who claim to be Ahl ul Quran yet nobody accepts them to be like the Ahl ul Quran (scholars of the Quran) of the past. Also the Ahl ul Hadith of the subcontinent are ghair muqallid whereas the Ahl ul Hadith of the past were followers of a particular school of Fiqh (apart from the Mujtahids) For this very reason the Muslims of the subcontinent were united until the Fitna by the name Ahl ul Hadith came into existence and it was from this very sect other groups such as Qadiyani, Nechri, Farahi and their offshoots emerged, this again was because they rejected the thousands of years of scholarship and decided to derive their own understandings from the Quran and Hadith. The current day Ahl ul Hadith sect was given this name officially by the British Raj, they were also the favourites of the Raj just like Mirza Qadiyani and were given many favours too. Some other points I would like to highlight - There is no such school of Fiqh called the school of Ahl e Hadith - Scholars and the muhaddithūn mentioned by brother Adnan such as Shah Abdul Haq, Shah Waliallah, Shah Ishaq, Shah Abdul Aziz and Shah Abdul Rahim were all followers of a school of Fiqh and a school of Tasawwuf - Early Muslims who came to the subcontinent were Shafa’ee and followers of a school of Fiqh - Shafaee school of Fiqh perform their prayers with rafa yadayn and even until this day they’re predominantly found in the maharashtra state of India and they very well coexisted with the Hanafi Muslims - this also rejects the notion that Hanafi were intolerant of those performing Salah with Rafa yadayn, even today Hanafi run mosques across the UK have Musallees who openly do Rafa Yadayn and Ameen Bil Jahr, there’s never been an issue. - Rather many Ahl e Hadith actually have a problem with those who don’t perform Ameen Bil Jahr or do Rafa Yadayn and label them as innovators - all schools of Fiqh are from the sunnah and the Hadith, Salah performed with Rafa yadayn and without or with folded hands and without are all established and were accepted by all Sunni Muslims, an example is the four Musallas at the holy Kaaba by the ottomans - Mahmood ghaznavi also a devotee of Abul Hassan kharqaani who was from the mystical (Sufi) school known as tayfūriya of Bayazid Bustaami RA which in the current day is known as the naqshbandi school of tasawwuf, this again proves the early Muslims took Quran, Hadith, Fiqh and tasawwuf as complete Islam unlike the modern day Ahl e Hadith sect which rejects tasawwuf and rejects following a school of Fiqh - shaykh Ali Hajweri author of kashf ul mahjūb was a sufi and a follower of Hanafi School, claiming their was no Hadith available back then is a false claim as his book on tasawwuf is full of references from various Ahādith - The point you mentioned regarding the word DATA is a non issue, it’s just linguistic and you are also wise enough to know that nobody calls or believes this scholar/saint to be god, it’s sad to see you label fellow Muslims as mushrik and clear intellectual dishonesty - Shaykh Abdul Qadri Jilani who’s reference you quoted in favour of the Ahl ul Hadith was referring to the muhaddithūn, not the British backed Ahl ul Hadith sect of the subcontinent, he himself was a follower of the hanbali school of Fiqh and a known Sufi, the Qadri and Shazli mystical orders come from him. This also reflects on what the actual traditional Islam was and how the Ahl ul hadith movement is nothing but an innovation. - the first muhaddith mentioned by brother adnan was Abdul Haq Muhaddith Dehlavi, he was a deciple of the Qadri sufi order and of the Naqshbandi sufi order too, he also authored a well known book called Akhbar ul Akhyar which again tells us the difference between the understanding of the muhaddithūn and the modern day Ahl ul Hadith sect - Speaking of qawwali, firstly it was not in the form of how it is today, it was originally kalimaat of dhikr and Quran being sung melodiously later other poetry was added and instruments such as daff were added too, it wasn’t performed in the open either and had strict conditions attached to it, Scholars such as Ibn hazm and ghazali who were non Indian had written on its permissibility however just like all things get commercialised and abused so did qawwali, but to say all of the Indian Muslims were involved in it and then it was because of Ibn taymiyyahs teaching’s people began to realise it was wrong is an absurd claim, rather the naqshbandi and the Qadri sufis were against qawwali and it was due to their teachings, Ibn Taymiyyah RA was unknown in India until the current day Ahl e Hadith sect came into existence. - your claim that people who were preaching the sunnah and doing Rafa yadayn were labelled as Wahabis and here you mentioned Shah ismaeel shaheed, this claim again is incorrect. When a new deen was established known as deen e ilahi where Hindu and Muslims were asked to unite in creed and a huge influence of the Rawafiz dominated it was non other than Shaykh Ahmad Farūqi Sarhandi who held up the flag of Sunnah, he was a deciple of Baqi Billah RA a naqshbandi Sufi and a follower of the Hanafi school, his works are also full of Hadith references which dismantles your claim regarding the absence of Hadith, now this man was given the title of Mujaddid by the very same Muslims of the subcontinent who name the Ahl ul Hadith as Wahabis, this proves preaching the sunnah was always accepted and never a problem but Wahhabism I.e introducing a new version of Islam in the garb of Hadith or the so-called sunnah is what was rejected. - shah ismail shahid who you claim upheld the sunnah wrote on tasawwuf and was a deciple of syed Ahmad rai brelvi, syed Ahmad’s Sufi order can be predominantly found in Bangladesh called tariqa Muhammadiya, the current day Ahl e Hadith sect of the subcontinent have no tasawwuf which again proves they’re not upon the path of those who they claim to hold as their teachers. - Fatawa we’re given against Shah Ismail Shahid by various scholars but they weren’t given because of his love for the Sunnah, one can refer to them Fatawas they’re openly available. - Syed Nazir Ahmad was clearly working against the interests of the Muslims, his Syed lineage is questionable, his anti jihad fatwa was not due to his love for Hadith but it was to serve the same agenda that Mirza Qadiyani served by advocating the same view, he also was the person who performed the nikah of Mirza ghulam Ahmad Qadiyani although Mirza was a Muslim then but the association is clear which indicates that they had many common friends, Syed nazir Ahmad wasn’t anti war either as he supported the war fought by shah ismaeel shaheed in balakot against the Sikhs, this war, where it benefitted the Muslims it had clearly benefitted the British raj and strengthened their hold too, additionally he Syed nazir was awarded or rewarded acres of land by the British raj, something they did to their stooges, therefore, the anger of the subcontinent Muslims against him was due this betrayal and not because of his love for the Hadith as you claim. Everything mentioned above is not personal at all, rather, purely an academic rebuttal, and I’m open to correction. I would also like to add I consider the Ahl e Hadith of the subcontinent as muslims with many positive contributions towards sunni Islam on all fronts.
Thank you for your through response. I am very grateful that you took the time to write such a lengthy and comprehensive response, in spite of the fact that I disagree with much of it. Your response may be as biased as you may have perceived mine to be. Some of the arguments you have presented are very common misconceptions. For instance, early Muslims followed madhahib. This is not true. I asked a very pertinent question: what madhab did those Muslims follow who arrived in Sindh first, led by Muhammad bin Qasim? Similarly, your claims about Shah Ismaeel Shaheed and Shah Wali Allah can easily be countered by presenting evidence to the contrary. Modern Ahl al-Hadith movement is not exactly the same as the group of classical Muhaditheen. They do, however, follow the same methodology. Also, you made many claims without producing direct evidence to support those ideas from the Quran and Sunnah. This is a lengthy discussion and I am currently very busy. I would love to discuss these points with you at Speakers Corner if you reside in the UK. We can go through every single one of your points and see if I have any reasonable responses. Allah bless you absolutely, ameen
@@MrAdnanRashid Jazakallah u khair for your response and I do apologise for any inconvenience caused. We’ve met before at speakers corner, and would love to discuss if we meet again. In the meantime may Allah preserve and bless you and accept your work and efforts for the deen. Ameen
As salaam Alaikum, please don't talk without proper knowledge; Ahl ul Hadith goes back to the First century AH; our three Imams out four are Ashab ul Hadith, Ahlu, Hadith Mean Quran, and Sunnah. The word Hadith mentioned in the Quran for the speech of Allah, which is the Quran, such as this verse 4:87. وَمَنْ أَصْدَقُ مِنَ ٱللَّهِ حَدِيثًۭا - And whose word is more truthful than Allah’s?. Also used for for our prophet's speech, actions, and Approvals, we have two types of revelation from Allah: Quran and Hadith. Allah says in the Quran 53:3 and 53:4 وَمَا يَنطِقُ عَنِ ٱلْهَوَىٰٓ - Nor does he speak of his own whims. إِنْ هُوَ إِلَّا وَحْىٌۭ يُوحَىٰ - It is only a revelation sent down ˹to him˺. Allah Knows Best.
@@DocumentingMoments First I'm not a Scholar, but the facts you presented are very much true. The Ahlul Hadith of Past are people who are Scholars of Hadith not today's Pseudo Ahle Hadith Sect also know as Wahabism or Pseudo-Salafis. They are totally new sect and divided the Muslims on petty issues. Wherever they went they only bought sectarianism to the Muslims Ummah labeling every Muslims as Mushrik or Biddati. Equalling past Ahle Hadith Scholars and today's Ahle Hadith Sect is grave error. They are totally opposite directions.
The Scholars of Hadith knows as Ahlul Hadith and Indian Ahle Hadith Sect ( also known by Salafis / wahabis ) are totally two different things. And the Dehlvi Family has nothing to do with this sect.
Read the chapter of difference between ashab ul hadith and ashab ur raay in Hujjatullahil baaligha by Shah Waliullah and then you will realise that the methodology of the ahle hadees/salafi is same as that of the Muhaddiseen. Alhamdulillah
@@reflection5057Mohammad said to follow Masoods Quran but Uthman burnt that & brought his own version out with perverted verses in it, like, you are allowed to have sex with 100 virgins in heaven before your wife who has been faithful all her life. Most likely added later because after the Prophet's death many Muslims were leaving Islam. The Prophet strictly forbidden anyone writing anything about him besides the Quran & you people wrote the hadiths with perverted & negative verses like the Prophet used to have sex with all his wives in one night without washing himself after each one, that too over 200 years after the Prophet's death & you saying your books are not corrupted??? Mohammad was mentioned in ancient Sanskrit texts of India so was Sri Guru Nanak ji both as Prophet's but strangely Dr.Nayak or other Islamic scholars fail to mention that on stage when they show off with their knowledge of Sanskrit texts, maybe to keep you people in the dark. Maybe that's why the Prophet said there will be 72 sects but only one is going to heaven. Read Taajudins Diary, which you can download for free online. Just Google it. Taajudin Nakshabandi accompanied Guru Nanak ji to the Middle East for 2 years and saw the Kaaba move besides other miracles attributed to Guru Nanak ji!!! It was compiled by an X Muslim Nawab of Mirpur, then part of India!!!
Ustadh Adnan Rashid. I love you and respect you and consider you my teacher. I even agree with you that those scholars who call you 'gustakh e rasool' are wrong. However, did you ever speak out against the actions of Saudi-Wahhabi scholars? Are the Saudi/UAE establishment practising the Sunnah? If so, why did they not re-establish the khilafah? Why did Abdul Aziz al-Saud take 5,000 pounds per month from the British? Was it because Abdul Aziz could kill the Mushriks of Madina? Astagfirullah! Why are the Saudi-Wahhabi scholars allowing Riba on the land of Tawhid? I am not a Deobandi, I follow Athari aqeedah and still follow the Ahlul Hadith as my mother raised me. However, I am sorry to say this Ustadh, while you were busy with Rafal Yadain, the Ummah has been bleeding by the betrayal of the powerful people who happens to follow your methodology, which also my methodology.
Dear brother, just because people follow a particular methodology or understanding of Islam does not make them angels. No one has the license to jannah except those promised by Allah and his Messenger. We will answer for our actions. Betrayal of the ummah is a universal phenomenon. Every school and denomination has its traitors. But we cannot make blanket statements against a group of people and put them all in one basket. All people mentioned by you must be considered separately. They were not the same. We must not have this reductionist mindset where we put people into categories and then condemn them. Not something I do myself.
@@MrAdnanRashid Ustadh. I am honored to be called your brother, although I have done nothing for the ummah compared to you. Jazak Allah Khair for your kind response. I definitely agree with your statement. These are wise words. There are many people who are leaving the Salafi dawah because very few or none of the salafi scholars in the internet have spoken out against the ill actions of the Saudi-Wahhabi establishment. You have the knowledge to change that and show us the truth, I believe, bi-iznillah. It broke my heart to hear one of the CZcamsrs (I will not mention his name) who claim to be a Salafi openly declares that there is shirk everywhere in Palestine. Auzubillah. That same person is also in favor of many Gulf states normalising with Israel, as if he is blindly following the rulers. I hope I am wrong but it creates an impression that there are Salafi scholars who are turning a blind eye to Palestine occupation because such scholars may consider Palestinians to be musriks/grave worshippers. I hope that one day with wisdom you can do a history series on how the Saudi-Wahhabi establishment betrayed the ummah and is the root of today's fitnah. I am aware that Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab wanted to uproot shirk and bid'ah but was he fully innocent or free from errors? Did his descendants not abuse his legacy to uproot bid'ah by killing Muslims in Madina and co-operating the British?
Brother - Why are you so keen to re-establish Khilafah? Does that fix today's Muslim problems? Why do you guys use Saudi Arabia as a scapegoat to undermine Islam? We used to have so Khilafa Usmaina, who promotes shirk and Bid'ah. Do we just want a label to feel good? we need to wake up and be real. why we are so naive when it comes to our religion. learn from these talks, did you read books or scholars that Brother Adnan Rasheed mentioned? For example, Tafseer-Tarjuman-Al-Quran-Be-Litaif-ul-Bayan by Alma Nawab Sidiq Hassan Khan in Urdu and his Tafseer in Arabic. I apologize if my words hurt you but truth needs to be spoken.
@@hamidabbasi5397The truth does indeed hurt. Your ignorance of history and lack of judgement are the scapegoats Saudi Arabia and similar gulf and middle east countries, including Turkey use to submit to the will of USA and Israel (Zionism, NATO) and get away with their crimes in the dunya. It is not about fixing Muslim's problems my dear brother. It is something established by the salaf. A true salafi should follow the footsteps of the salaf. Period. People also have the right to know the truth of how some people betrayed the ummah and how the same people led us to where we are today. The same people from day one allowed riba on the land of Tawhid, perhaps forgetting that Allah and his Rasul (pbuh) declared war on riba, and yet claim to pracitce pure Tawhid. I am aware of the reality. I hope you are not like one of the youtubers who support rulers who want to normalise relationship with Israel and is a fanboy of the gulf rulers. I am aware that many shuyookh of the daulat Usmaniyya turned a blind eye to shirk but do not forget that the Ottoman rulers also protected us from the kuffars of Europe. Otherwise, Ustadh Adnan Rashid would not show interest to the Ottoman era. Am I right, Ustadh Adnan Rashid? Do the rulers of the lands of Tawhid protect us from the kuffars of today? (except for king Faysal Rahimahullah!)
I’m from America & I don’t think Mr. Rashid remembers me but 7 mos. ago I came to these Muslim channels ( never met a Muslim) & on his channel I noticed how kind he was to Christians so I left a kind message never thinking he would answer me back, he did & welcomed me to his channel.
Two days ago I took my Shahada & it is because of this wonderful man I am a Muslim today.
Could someone tell him that I thank him this girl who was taught not to trust a Muslim. Ty❤️
Allahu Akbar! Welcome to the truth! May Allah grant you and ustadh Adnan Jannatul Firdous (highest level of Paradise)
May beloved sister, you have put a big smile on my face today. I am honoured to learn that you have accepted the religion our Creator has chosen for us. May Allah bless you always and take you from strength to strength. Thank you for reaching out and I want you to remember me (and family) in prayers. Please do plead with Allah to forgive my errors and save me from his displeasure. I also advise you to strengthen your knowledge and practice. Please visit www.onereason.org for helpful information for new Muslims. Allah bless you and make your path to paradise easy, ameen. Wassalam. Adnan.
P.S: see also newmuslim.iera.org/
@@MrAdnanRashid
I shall certainly pray for you and your family especially your son Musa who looks just like you and he also follows you in his love of God. Your son is a joy to watch so kind to others too.❤️
@@AlwaysHope_Alhamdulilah welcome sister
@@HumbleConfidenceES
You’re so kind thank you.💐
salam alaikum brother. Adnan Rashid really helped me comprehend islam. subhanallah
Mash'Allah, an educational talk. Thank you for sharing.
Assalamualaikum Adnan bahi. From Sri Lanka
Free Balochistan😔😔
Pakistan stop kidnapped and killed innocent Muslim Brothers Sisters😔 all innocent family😔
May Allah protect innocent family😔 in Pakistan
?????? @@thebesttruth4659
Barakallahou feek Ustadh Adnan
Machaallah. Are you preparing and memorizing your talking points before delivering a detailed and precise lecture like this? May Allah increase your and our knowledge.
Jazakallahu khair
Exemplary! A humble request that plz translate your lecture into Urdu as well. The reason is that Many understand Urdu in pak and india and if they listen to your lectures this will be a life changer for them bcz still a huge chunk of Muslims are doing heresy.
Free Balochistan😔😔😔
Pakistan stop kidnapped and killed innocent Muslim Brothers Sisters😔 all innocent family😔
May Allah protect innocent family😔 in Pakistan
You mean the military establishment @@thebesttruth4659
Ameen.
Very true but then they don't make efforts to learn too
@@thebesttruth4659cry lindu-cowdung eater rss-terrorist-sangh-parivar
Thanks to Ahle Hadis, people in Bangladesh now know what bedat is , what are shirk and kufr . And we now know that There are weak and fake Hadiths . Before that people didn't know hadis can be faked or weak . The work of ahle hadis are beneficial for the ummah , Alhamdulillah . People now are more aware of the shirk , bedat and kufr . And now many people are following the sahih sunnah/hadis .
Salaam my brother may allah bless you
جزاك الله خيرا 🇲🇦 المغرب
Free Balochistan😔😔😔
Pakistan stop kidnapped and killed innocent Muslim Brothers Sisters😔 all innocent family😔
May Allah protect innocent family😔 in Pakistan
Alhamdulillah
Assalamualaikum Adnan sir
Ustad You didn't talk much about Sanaullah Amritsari (A R) who totally dismantled and debunked the mirza Qadyani.
Alhamdulillah may Allah protect Ahlehadis scholars for serving and propagating the true Islam.
Assalamu’alaikum warahmatullahi wabarakatuh
السَّلاَمُ عَلَيْكُمْ وَرَحْمَةُ اللهِ وَبَرَكَاتُهُ
52:20 that man was also a scholar n class fellow of shah Waliullah. His name was za'ir Allahabadi. Y'all should listen to Shaykh Zafarul Hassan's lecture taqwiyatul iman. It has more detailed info about ahlul hadith in India
Assalamu alaikum brother I have a question.
Slamun alekum ustadh Adnan,
May almighty ALLAH bless you
Free Palestine INSHA ALLAH
A quick question. The closest companions of Prophet have narrated the least amount of Hadiths. Why is that?
Is there any urdu books that you could recommend that i can get my family in pakistan to read they follow the sufi islam and distrust the hadith. They love Ali ibn uthman hajwari.
What about abi bakr rabih bin sabih sadi al basri? Came to hind?
Wrote musnad and transmitted hadith.
Assalaam alaikoum do we have any afrikan hadits collectors? I'm just curious
Walaikum assalam. I dont know much but Saudi have some ulbig ulema of ethiopian origin.
You should do Islam in bangladesh or bangladesh independence
🌹🌹🌹❤️❤️❤️❤️
Be blessed brother, may Allah SWT reward you with the best of both the world's. Aameen. Regards from bangalore India.
Free Balochistan😔😔
Pakistan stop kidnapped and killed innocent Muslim Brothers Sisters😔😔all innocent family😔😔
May Allah protect innocent family😔😔in Pakistan
👍
Ahle Hadis of the subcontinent and ahlal hadith are world's apart. There is no similarity between the former and ahlus sunnah (ahlal hadith who are from ahlus sunnah). The former are ahlal biddah.
The ahlal hadith actually collect information that they believe is from or they attribute it to the Prophet (peace be upon him), although their kutub have other than that in them as well so hadith or kutub of hadith aren't restrictive at least. Your definition of sunnah is also off, but I don't have time to correct it, brother.
Yes 💯
In south India, especially in kerala, most Muslims follow the Shaafi maz'hab
What do you think of Ismael Dehlvi and Ahmad Raibarelvi ?
Ahmed khan bralvi destroyed Islam with his personal opinions
@ahmadcheema4202 do research I m taking about syed Ahmad Raibarelvi, who was early wahabi in India
@@mohammadshoeb2138
Ok 👍
Don't be a fitna spreader. Have some shame. We all know what you are trying to do
I have a question brother adnan Rashid some people say Mohammad bin qasim was hanafi muqalid is it true if not then what were they and how they were
praying in hanfi style or in the way mentioned by rasoolallah sallallahu alaihi wasallam.......?
My second question is some people say ahlulhadith were agents of British empire is it true?
Check the birth date of abu hanifa and muhammad bin qasim. It is not possible for muhamad bin qasim to be hanafi.You also have to know that it was the turks who spread the hanafi fiqh. Most persians in iran even today are shafi.
The ‘hanafi’ style is also from the Sunnah of Prophet Muhammed (peace be upon him). Please don’t use sectarian language. It’s false and misleading
@@alphauno6614 yes it is.but some people say you have to be muqalid of only school of thought that is what I was clarifying.
@@alphauno6614 If you are addressing me, then I will answer it. Yes it is a valid school of thought and follows the sunnah but that does not negate what I said above. Also this fact does not make hanafi school of thought superior or inferior to others. On the other hand, these types of stories e.g. Muhammad bin Qasim is hanafi, shows that there is an undertone of differentiation amongst hanafi of south asia.
Üstad ru talking bout the Wahhabi sect?
We better call ourselves Muslims,
I'm ex-beralvi.
Sufis were the greatest critics of the sufis.
48:08
Summarzing this video for you: Look look Abu hanifa, Malik, Shafi'i Ahmed ibn Hambal didn't understood hadith but our layman( who does basically tarjeeh) of late 17-18th century did.
Look look hanafis and Shafi'i in subcontinent never spoke against bow down to grave and dancing musics etc later some layman come and taught them hadiths.
Look how cool and madness of la Madhiabism is.
(La Madhiabism who follow scholars and don't go debunking other layman of Ahlul Sunnah is accepted incontext to fiQh)
We face that hatred everyday where we are called Gustakhe Rasool and Wahabi. JazakAllah for explaining it in such a simple manner.
The fact that the kingdoms were run on this fiqs shows its strength, Its funny how the Ahle hadith u are advocating dont even have their own fiq, they study Hanafi fiq and say wht not to follow, i have watched many of your lectures but this is not your territory, you do what u do best, leave this topic to the ulemas, there are loops in almost everything you have said on this topic
Hanafi, Safi', Maliki and Handball are all schools of Fiqh. That's what they excel in. You do make a good point and what Adnan said is also valid. The schools of Fiqh should produce more Ahadith experts so they can weed out any few problems here and there. Allah knows best
I AM AHLUL HADEETH ALHAMDULILLAH THE ONE AND ONLY RIGHT PATH THAT IS AHLUL HADEETH imam Bukhari
The issue is that Hadith should also have passed down through ijma and tawatur just like Quran!
We shouldn’t be needing anyone’s research and investigation in regards of the religion!
And you think sahih Hadith are not by ijma ? Go and learn some ilm al Hadith and how did Muslim scholars criticize questionable hadiths and their concern for the truth
@@babahadjimohamed9339 For Ijma no research or investigation is needed because masses know!
Free Balochistan😔
Pakistan stop kidnapped and killed innocent Muslim Brothers Sisters😔😔all innocent family😔😔
May Allah protect innocent family😔 in Pakistan
you are too naïve. Allah has not taken a guarantee of hadith like for quran. And it is easy to corrupt books of hadith. thats whywe need a proper research on its authenticity
@babahadjimohamed9339 There's no ijma on sahi. It's a standard that varies between the aimah of hadith and it is also khabr ahad. There are hadith that have tawatar, but they are few and far.
its not as if the madhabs aren't going back to the Quran and sunnah. You realize the bulk of the differences of opinion among the madhabs go back to the sahabah themselves, and these are minor differences. We as lay Muslims cannot do the research ourselves and start coming up with our own fatwahs and start deriving Islamic rulings. This is why we rely on madhabs and by the way the madhabs were among the early generations of Muslims themselves if they differed their differences are minor and they back to the sahabah themselves. If you say were not going to follow a madhab and go back to the Quran and sunnah directly you end up creating your own madhab as well and if you try deriving rulings yourself you will be held accountable on the day of judgement for the mistakes you make. What I feel is that as a lay Muslim rather than doing your own research better just follow a madhab for more clarity.
Quran 17:36 "do not speak up for what you have no knowledge over".
Another verse in which it says "So ask the people of knowledge if you do not know" Quran 16:43. These verses show us that we cannot do ijtehaad ourselves.
When u mentioned a point in regards to fatiha, there is hadith and also mention in quran for people to follow an imam, Also about the point u made in regards to self study, is everyone capable enough to do his own study and understanding of Quran and Bukhari ? if people start doing that we would have a millions school of thoghts from the present day 4 i suppose, The fiq these 4 renowned schools of thoughts have, arent these derived from the quran and the Hadith? You said when Mohammed Qasim came by Abu Hanifa was 12, he had access to the most knowledgeable people if he has any access to the people you have spoken about, i really love and appreciate the knowledge u hold but do not propagate self study or make it sound so simple, if u have to go to an imam today , why not go to imams who have established fiqa centuries ago close to the origin of islam ? There have been some corrections that have been made by Imam Mohammad and Imam Yusuf, its actually these 3 who are involved in Hanafi fiqa, if the people have sufi inclinations than balme the people why blame the school of thoughts which have been such a unifying force for centuries, its simply a myth that people will come under one roof, they will have a million more thought of schools, if u let this to the whips of people, Am open to understanding this concept but the points you made in regards to other fiqs and self study somehow doesn seem real
You're definitely right. From this lecture the lesson I've learnt is that Muslims in the hanafi madhab (and others I presume) should have a greater focus on Adhadith. This is totally reasonable. You can specialise to become a muhadith if you go through these institutions as far as I know. There was no criticism of the underlying foundation of the hanafi madhab.
It's is the saying of mohammed saw we must follow. As per hadith when sahaba was following imam and praying and reading every word that mohammed saw said he asked to stop doing it and read only surah fatiha. Please let me know if you need hadith number Insha'allah i will present it. May Allah accept us
Even Sheikh Albani(r.a)(todays Ahlul real hadith) said their is no need of reciting faitha behind imam in loud prayer.
Sheikh Fawzan has refuated this really badly and even hadith on chest
How much baised and Ignorant you are fear Allah.
May Allah humiliated the people who has hatered against Madhiab of Salaf.
May Allah give victory to the people of Madhiab of Salaf the true Alhul hadith not a sect of sub-continent.
Brother calm down. Your information in the beginning was very informative but then you got crazy. Please have some decorum. Was this the akhlaq wal adab of our Nabi Muhammed sallalahualayhiwasalam? May Allah guide us to the righteous path.
He says one doesnt need to follow any school of thought but he himself follows thought of "ahlul hadith" 🤔
Ignorant trying to mixing Alhul hadith of Salaf to today sect which is nothing but la Madhiab layman and among them are todya Mirza Ali(who say he will raise sword against Movayia and many evil and nonsense) who does tarjeeh which is not permissible as imam Ahmed said atleast 3-4million hadith are memorization is required for someone to do Ijthad and Ahmed himself memorized 1 million hadith Mujthaid Mutalq and Madhiab are just based on mujthaideen mutalq rather after them serious of scholars who studied Quran and hadith and fiq.
He is trying to show like Shafii and hanfias don't have any idea of Hadith then someone taught them something like this nonsense.
@@Yoyo-dx8wz I'm a huge fan of Adnan bai... but in this case I prefer madhabs more than ahlul hadith...
@@AbidAli-mu3qt even Sheikh Fawzan praised the four Madhiab of Alhul Sunnah
@@Yoyo-dx8wzWho cares we just follow the Quran and Sunnah rather than your self made and imposed fiqhs, show proof from Quran or from the prophet that we need to blindly follow any of these four fikhs (nearly sects)
@@abcdefg98138 you subcontinent people follow the Quran and Hadith according to your own understanding which leads to deviance we follow according to Mujthadeen's I don't have to give as scholars have already go and watch Sheikh Fawzan.
No scholar ever state Madhiab are sect rather a layman for subcontient that's how you guyz head toward deviance
Ulema e ahle hadees zindabad🥰🥰🥰
Good lecture but a slight bias and intellectual dishonesty was evident during parts of the lecture. Additionally, please differentiate between the Ahl Ul Hadith of the past and the Ahl ul Hadith sect in the subcontinent. The Ahl ul Hadith of the past were muhaddithūn (scholars of Hadith) and Ahl e Hadith of the subcontinent today are a sect not upon the truth, they’re like the pervezi sect who claim to be Ahl ul Quran yet nobody accepts them to be like the Ahl ul Quran (scholars of the Quran) of the past. Also the Ahl ul Hadith of the subcontinent are ghair muqallid whereas the Ahl ul Hadith of the past were followers of a particular school of Fiqh (apart from the Mujtahids)
For this very reason the Muslims of the subcontinent were united until the Fitna by the name Ahl ul Hadith came into existence and it was from this very sect other groups such as Qadiyani, Nechri, Farahi and their offshoots emerged, this again was because they rejected the thousands of years of scholarship and decided to derive their own understandings from the Quran and Hadith. The current day Ahl ul Hadith sect was given this name officially by the British Raj, they were also the favourites of the Raj just like Mirza Qadiyani and were given many favours too.
Some other points I would like to highlight
- There is no such school of Fiqh called the school of Ahl e Hadith
- Scholars and the muhaddithūn mentioned by brother Adnan such as Shah Abdul Haq, Shah Waliallah, Shah Ishaq, Shah Abdul Aziz and Shah Abdul Rahim were all followers of a school of Fiqh and a school of Tasawwuf
- Early Muslims who came to the subcontinent were Shafa’ee and followers of a school of Fiqh
- Shafaee school of Fiqh perform their prayers with rafa yadayn and even until this day they’re predominantly found in the maharashtra state of India and they very well coexisted with the Hanafi Muslims
- this also rejects the notion that Hanafi were intolerant of those performing Salah with Rafa yadayn, even today Hanafi run mosques across the UK have Musallees who openly do Rafa Yadayn and Ameen Bil Jahr, there’s never been an issue.
- Rather many Ahl e Hadith actually have a problem with those who don’t perform Ameen Bil Jahr or do Rafa Yadayn and label them as innovators
- all schools of Fiqh are from the sunnah and the Hadith, Salah performed with Rafa yadayn and without or with folded hands and without are all established and were accepted by all Sunni Muslims, an example is the four Musallas at the holy Kaaba by the ottomans
- Mahmood ghaznavi also a devotee of Abul Hassan kharqaani who was from the mystical (Sufi) school known as tayfūriya of Bayazid Bustaami RA which in the current day is known as the naqshbandi school of tasawwuf, this again proves the early Muslims took Quran, Hadith, Fiqh and tasawwuf as complete Islam unlike the modern day Ahl e Hadith sect which rejects tasawwuf and rejects following a school of Fiqh
- shaykh Ali Hajweri author of kashf ul mahjūb was a sufi and a follower of Hanafi School, claiming their was no Hadith available back then is a false claim as his book on tasawwuf is full of references from various Ahādith
- The point you mentioned regarding the word DATA is a non issue, it’s just linguistic and you are also wise enough to know that nobody calls or believes this scholar/saint to be god, it’s sad to see you label fellow Muslims as mushrik and clear intellectual dishonesty
- Shaykh Abdul Qadri Jilani who’s reference you quoted in favour of the Ahl ul Hadith was referring to the muhaddithūn, not the British backed Ahl ul Hadith sect of the subcontinent, he himself was a follower of the hanbali school of Fiqh and a known Sufi, the Qadri and Shazli mystical orders come from him. This also reflects on what the actual traditional Islam was and how the Ahl ul hadith movement is nothing but an innovation.
- the first muhaddith mentioned by brother adnan was Abdul Haq Muhaddith Dehlavi, he was a deciple of the Qadri sufi order and of the Naqshbandi sufi order too, he also authored a well known book called Akhbar ul Akhyar which again tells us the difference between the understanding of the muhaddithūn and the modern day Ahl ul Hadith sect
- Speaking of qawwali, firstly it was not in the form of how it is today, it was originally kalimaat of dhikr and Quran being sung melodiously later other poetry was added and instruments such as daff were added too, it wasn’t performed in the open either and had strict conditions attached to it, Scholars such as Ibn hazm and ghazali who were non Indian had written on its permissibility however just like all things get commercialised and abused so did qawwali, but to say all of the Indian Muslims were involved in it and then it was because of Ibn taymiyyahs teaching’s people began to realise it was wrong is an absurd claim, rather the naqshbandi and the Qadri sufis were against qawwali and it was due to their teachings, Ibn Taymiyyah RA was unknown in India until the current day Ahl e Hadith sect came into existence.
- your claim that people who were preaching the sunnah and doing Rafa yadayn were labelled as Wahabis and here you mentioned Shah ismaeel shaheed, this claim again is incorrect. When a new deen was established known as deen e ilahi where Hindu and Muslims were asked to unite in creed and a huge influence of the Rawafiz dominated it was non other than Shaykh Ahmad Farūqi Sarhandi who held up the flag of Sunnah, he was a deciple of Baqi Billah RA a naqshbandi Sufi and a follower of the Hanafi school, his works are also full of Hadith references which dismantles your claim regarding the absence of Hadith, now this man was given the title of Mujaddid by the very same Muslims of the subcontinent who name the Ahl ul Hadith as Wahabis, this proves preaching the sunnah was always accepted and never a problem but Wahhabism I.e introducing a new version of Islam in the garb of Hadith or the so-called sunnah is what was rejected.
- shah ismail shahid who you claim upheld the sunnah wrote on tasawwuf and was a deciple of syed Ahmad rai brelvi, syed Ahmad’s Sufi order can be predominantly found in Bangladesh called tariqa Muhammadiya, the current day Ahl e Hadith sect of the subcontinent have no tasawwuf which again proves they’re not upon the path of those who they claim to hold as their teachers.
- Fatawa we’re given against Shah Ismail Shahid by various scholars but they weren’t given because of his love for the Sunnah, one can refer to them Fatawas they’re openly available.
- Syed Nazir Ahmad was clearly working against the interests of the Muslims, his Syed lineage is questionable, his anti jihad fatwa was not due to his love for Hadith but it was to serve the same agenda that Mirza Qadiyani served by advocating the same view, he also was the person who performed the nikah of Mirza ghulam Ahmad Qadiyani although Mirza was a Muslim then but the association is clear which indicates that they had many common friends, Syed nazir Ahmad wasn’t anti war either as he supported the war fought by shah ismaeel shaheed in balakot against the Sikhs, this war, where it benefitted the Muslims it had clearly benefitted the British raj and strengthened their hold too, additionally he Syed nazir was awarded or rewarded acres of land by the British raj, something they did to their stooges, therefore, the anger of the subcontinent Muslims against him was due this betrayal and not because of his love for the Hadith as you claim.
Everything mentioned above is not personal at all, rather, purely an academic rebuttal, and I’m open to correction. I would also like to add I consider the Ahl e Hadith of the subcontinent as muslims with many positive contributions towards sunni Islam on all fronts.
Thank you for your through response. I am very grateful that you took the time to write such a lengthy and comprehensive response, in spite of the fact that I disagree with much of it. Your response may be as biased as you may have perceived mine to be. Some of the arguments you have presented are very common misconceptions. For instance, early Muslims followed madhahib. This is not true. I asked a very pertinent question: what madhab did those Muslims follow who arrived in Sindh first, led by Muhammad bin Qasim? Similarly, your claims about Shah Ismaeel Shaheed and Shah Wali Allah can easily be countered by presenting evidence to the contrary. Modern Ahl al-Hadith movement is not exactly the same as the group of classical Muhaditheen. They do, however, follow the same methodology. Also, you made many claims without producing direct evidence to support those ideas from the Quran and Sunnah. This is a lengthy discussion and I am currently very busy. I would love to discuss these points with you at Speakers Corner if you reside in the UK. We can go through every single one of your points and see if I have any reasonable responses. Allah bless you absolutely, ameen
@@MrAdnanRashid Jazakallah u khair for your response and I do apologise for any inconvenience caused. We’ve met before at speakers corner, and would love to discuss if we meet again. In the meantime may Allah preserve and bless you and accept your work and efforts for the deen. Ameen
As salaam Alaikum, please don't talk without proper knowledge; Ahl ul Hadith goes back to the First century AH; our three Imams out four are Ashab ul Hadith, Ahlu, Hadith Mean Quran, and Sunnah. The word Hadith mentioned in the Quran for the speech of Allah, which is the Quran, such as this verse 4:87. وَمَنْ أَصْدَقُ مِنَ ٱللَّهِ حَدِيثًۭا - And whose word is more truthful than Allah’s?. Also used for for our prophet's speech, actions, and Approvals, we have two types of revelation from Allah: Quran and Hadith. Allah says in the Quran 53:3 and 53:4 وَمَا يَنطِقُ عَنِ ٱلْهَوَىٰٓ - Nor does he speak of his own whims. إِنْ هُوَ إِلَّا وَحْىٌۭ يُوحَىٰ - It is only a revelation sent down ˹to him˺. Allah Knows Best.
@@DocumentingMoments First I'm not a Scholar, but the facts you presented are very much true. The Ahlul Hadith of Past are people who are Scholars of Hadith not today's Pseudo Ahle Hadith Sect also know as Wahabism or Pseudo-Salafis. They are totally new sect and divided the Muslims on petty issues. Wherever they went they only bought sectarianism to the Muslims Ummah labeling every Muslims as Mushrik or Biddati.
Equalling past Ahle Hadith Scholars and today's Ahle Hadith Sect is grave error. They are totally opposite directions.
Wow. A very thorough response Allahummabarik. Would love to see a discussion on this. @MrAdnanRashid
The Scholars of Hadith knows as Ahlul Hadith and Indian Ahle Hadith Sect ( also known by Salafis / wahabis ) are totally two different things. And the Dehlvi Family has nothing to do with this sect.
Read the chapter of difference between ashab ul hadith and ashab ur raay in Hujjatullahil baaligha by Shah Waliullah and then you will realise that the methodology of the ahle hadees/salafi is same as that of the Muhaddiseen. Alhamdulillah
@@reflection5057Mohammad said to follow Masoods Quran but Uthman burnt that & brought his own version out with perverted verses in it, like, you are allowed to have sex with 100 virgins in heaven before your wife who has been faithful all her life. Most likely added later because after the Prophet's death many Muslims were leaving Islam.
The Prophet strictly forbidden anyone writing anything about him besides the Quran & you people wrote the hadiths with perverted & negative verses like the Prophet used to have sex with all his wives in one night without washing himself after each one, that too over 200 years after the Prophet's death & you saying your books are not corrupted???
Mohammad was mentioned in ancient Sanskrit texts of India so was Sri Guru Nanak ji both as Prophet's but strangely Dr.Nayak or other Islamic scholars fail to mention that on stage when they show off with their knowledge of Sanskrit texts, maybe to keep you people in the dark. Maybe that's why the Prophet said there will be 72 sects but only one is going to heaven.
Read Taajudins Diary, which you can download for free online. Just Google it. Taajudin Nakshabandi accompanied Guru Nanak ji to the Middle East for 2 years and saw the Kaaba move besides other miracles attributed to Guru Nanak ji!!!
It was compiled by an X Muslim Nawab of Mirpur, then part of India!!!
@@reflection5057Shah Waliullah rh was pure hanafi
..
@@reflection5057come and discuss
Be jealous because you can’t prove he was brelvi deobandi
Wahabi detected Opinion rejected.
قرآن کی کسی سرل ہندی ترجمہ موجود نہیں ہے. پہلے اس چیز پر نظر دینا ضروری ہے.
زیادہ عربی-فارسی الفاظ استعمال نہیں ہونا چاہئے.
#سرل_ہندی_ترجمہ
wahabi😂
Ustadh Adnan Rashid. I love you and respect you and consider you my teacher. I even agree with you that those scholars who call you 'gustakh e rasool' are wrong. However, did you ever speak out against the actions of Saudi-Wahhabi scholars? Are the Saudi/UAE establishment practising the Sunnah? If so, why did they not re-establish the khilafah? Why did Abdul Aziz al-Saud take 5,000 pounds per month from the British? Was it because Abdul Aziz could kill the Mushriks of Madina? Astagfirullah! Why are the Saudi-Wahhabi scholars allowing Riba on the land of Tawhid?
I am not a Deobandi, I follow Athari aqeedah and still follow the Ahlul Hadith as my mother raised me. However, I am sorry to say this Ustadh, while you were busy with Rafal Yadain, the Ummah has been bleeding by the betrayal of the powerful people who happens to follow your methodology, which also my methodology.
Dear brother, just because people follow a particular methodology or understanding of Islam does not make them angels. No one has the license to jannah except those promised by Allah and his Messenger. We will answer for our actions. Betrayal of the ummah is a universal phenomenon. Every school and denomination has its traitors. But we cannot make blanket statements against a group of people and put them all in one basket. All people mentioned by you must be considered separately. They were not the same. We must not have this reductionist mindset where we put people into categories and then condemn them. Not something I do myself.
@@MrAdnanRashid Ustadh. I am honored to be called your brother, although I have done nothing for the ummah compared to you. Jazak Allah Khair for your kind response. I definitely agree with your statement. These are wise words. There are many people who are leaving the Salafi dawah because very few or none of the salafi scholars in the internet have spoken out against the ill actions of the Saudi-Wahhabi establishment. You have the knowledge to change that and show us the truth, I believe, bi-iznillah.
It broke my heart to hear one of the CZcamsrs (I will not mention his name) who claim to be a Salafi openly declares that there is shirk everywhere in Palestine. Auzubillah. That same person is also in favor of many Gulf states normalising with Israel, as if he is blindly following the rulers. I hope I am wrong but it creates an impression that there are Salafi scholars who are turning a blind eye to Palestine occupation because such scholars may consider Palestinians to be musriks/grave worshippers.
I hope that one day with wisdom you can do a history series on how the Saudi-Wahhabi establishment betrayed the ummah and is the root of today's fitnah. I am aware that Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab wanted to uproot shirk and bid'ah but was he fully innocent or free from errors? Did his descendants not abuse his legacy to uproot bid'ah by killing Muslims in Madina and co-operating the British?
Why are you spreading fitnah? What's the khair you want to bring by criticising rulers which is already a trait of Khawarij?@@rakibalmahdi2401
Brother - Why are you so keen to re-establish Khilafah? Does that fix today's Muslim problems? Why do you guys use Saudi Arabia as a scapegoat to undermine Islam? We used to have so Khilafa Usmaina, who promotes shirk and Bid'ah. Do we just want a label to feel good? we need to wake up and be real. why we are so naive when it comes to our religion. learn from these talks, did you read books or scholars that Brother Adnan Rasheed mentioned? For example, Tafseer-Tarjuman-Al-Quran-Be-Litaif-ul-Bayan by Alma Nawab Sidiq Hassan Khan in Urdu and his Tafseer in Arabic. I apologize if my words hurt you but truth needs to be spoken.
@@hamidabbasi5397The truth does indeed hurt. Your ignorance of history and lack of judgement are the scapegoats Saudi Arabia and similar gulf and middle east countries, including Turkey use to submit to the will of USA and Israel (Zionism, NATO) and get away with their crimes in the dunya.
It is not about fixing Muslim's problems my dear brother. It is something established by the salaf. A true salafi should follow the footsteps of the salaf. Period.
People also have the right to know the truth of how some people betrayed the ummah and how the same people led us to where we are today. The same people from day one allowed riba on the land of Tawhid, perhaps forgetting that Allah and his Rasul (pbuh) declared war on riba, and yet claim to pracitce pure Tawhid.
I am aware of the reality. I hope you are not like one of the youtubers who support rulers who want to normalise relationship with Israel and is a fanboy of the gulf rulers. I am aware that many shuyookh of the daulat Usmaniyya turned a blind eye to shirk but do not forget that the Ottoman rulers also protected us from the kuffars of Europe. Otherwise, Ustadh Adnan Rashid would not show interest to the Ottoman era. Am I right, Ustadh Adnan Rashid?
Do the rulers of the lands of Tawhid protect us from the kuffars of today? (except for king Faysal Rahimahullah!)
48:27