I noticed some horrible distortion in the corners on the 10-22 shooting wide open. I mostly always stop down the lens which can deal with this but its interesting to note that the 10-18 performs better in this area, albeit it is a slower lens.
Great video. Thank you. I'm wondering do you think the image stabilizer is a huge difference to get the 10-18? I don't do videos and I have EOS 80d. Your input is greatly appreciated. I subscribed to your channel :)
I've shot with the 10-18mm for 3 years and the 10-22mm for 3 months and I can say there is definitely a slight sharpness improvement with the 22mm. Also, lens distortion in the 11-14mm range is slightly less significant on the 22mm. The 10-18mm is a very good lens, especially for the price, but I am confident there is an improvement with image quality with the 10-22mm.
Nice video. I watched this on Sunday May 23rd, then decided to buy my 10-18. I cannot understand why you don't have more subscribers. Keep making the videos.
Mate, thank you SO much for putting this video together! How do you not have more subscribers!? I loved the video and your style... and more importantly, I can finally buy the 10-18 and get some rest because I haven't slept over a week analyzing the damn thing!
Oh hey thank you so much for the comment and hoping you are managing to do some photography or videos during this time in the world, very unusual! Thanks again and be well.
holy crap this channel is so much smaller than I was expecting, I thought you were some big review channel haha. Great points, I have the 10-18mm and I was curious as to if I should buy the 10-22 but you just saved me a good half grand, thank you!
Wow man captivating. 5 scenes per second average. You are a writer director actor and camera man very impressive. ? Got the 10 18mm. Anyone make a screw on linear non fisheye 67mm wide angle converter ? now that would be wide but extra weight could kill the auto focus motor so just manual focus.
Haha thank you so much, I'm just playing around having some fun! Hmm not sure about the wide angle converter, I have seen them for 58mm but not sure about 67mm, could be interesting!
Thanks, getting the 10-18 for sure now. The 10-22 looked terrible wide open and has some bad chromatic aberration as well. On top of that there is the price difference and the IS on the 10-18. No brainer if you ask me.
+Jeroen thanks for the consideration! The main difference is the IS for sure, especially for video work.. the main drawback is the f4.5 aperture on the 10-18 makes it quite dark but it still does a good job! Have a good one!!!
I bought the 10-22mm. I plan to use the lens in low light, so that extra stop of light will be more welcomed than stabilization. I have the canon m50 that has in body stabilization... I hope its enough to give me good pictures. At worse I will return it for the 10-18mm
All the best for that, I hope it goes well, should be all good at the wider focal length don’t require stabilisation quite as much. Thanks for commenting and hope you have a good one!
Oh yeah I agree the f3.5 is really noticeable difference to the 4.5, that’s the biggest downer, much better if the 10-18 was 3.5 or if they could put IS in the lens
Hey Dinesh, thank you so much for watching and subscribing, wow I made this video a long time ago I hope I can have some more recent videos for you as well! I really appreciate your feedback and time, have a great day!
I have been struggling with deciding what wide angle canon lens I should get. I have been bidding on 2nd hand canon 10-18 as the 10-22 are much pricier. I have a sigma 10-20 wide angle 1:4-5.6 but its a lot heavier and no IS - I'm keen to get a decent wide angle I can use mainly outdoors with a glidecam - I recently got a Samyang 14mm F2.8 but it also has no IS and is a manual lens - this lens I got for wide angle in low light but I am keen on the 10-18 Canon as it appears to be much lighter and compact. Great comparison and after seeing your vid I'm definitely going for the 10-18 Canon
Hey Patrick, thanks a lot for the detailed comment and I follow your thought process. The main fault I find on the 10-18 having used it for quite a bit longer now is the flaring and loss of contrast in challenging light, you will need to set up your shooting angle to compensate or deflect the light, otherwise it certainly is light and compact but in saying that I have given mine some pretty rugged treatment and it holds up pretty well. Hey thanks again for dropping in and for the sub, and have a great week coming up!
Hey thanks a lot for that feedback... the 90D looks awesome, I have an 80D and an R but I’m keen on a 90 to update... cheers again and let me know what you decide!
Thank you for this great video, I was thinking to upgrade my 10-18mm but I think am going to continue with the 10-18mm , the quality on the 10-22mm not convince me. Thank you again 👍
Hey Jose, Hope you are well in these strange times for the whole planet. Apologies for the late reply and thanks for the comment. I would agree with you on your decision, only to say that neither lens is perfect but overall the 10-18 is the better performer, if only they could Blend the lenses together so it was an affordable 10-22 with STM motor and IS, now that would be fun. Thanks again and stay well.
Hi, cool video! It came at a perfect time as I'm looking at which one of these wide angle lenses to put on my 90D for landscapes. They will be on a tripod so IS is not really a contributing factor for my needs. So would you say I'd be better off with the 22mm seeing it will always be on a tripod? Keen to hear your opinion. Thanks!
Hey there, thanks for the comment. If you are doing landscapes and will keep it on a tripod the 10-22 is the better option, with much cleaner photos. Try to find one you can hold before you buy. If the body is still rigid and tight you’re good, if it feels a bit loose or sloppy then the lens is moving around and some corners could be blurry.
@@TheOtherPhotoGuy Brilliant! Thank you so much for your advice. I've subscribed to your channel and look forward to watching some more of your videos! Have a great day. 😊
Hi. I'm a beginner and still on the learning curve about lenses. I know that the 10-22 has higher maximum aperture of F 3.5 than the F 4-5 in 10-18. I would like to ask if this slight difference would really be significant factor under low light? Thanks
Hey Jessa, thanks for checking out the vid and for the question... in short my answer is yes it does make a noticeable difference in low light having the extra 2/3 stops of light at the same shutter speeds... f/4.5 can be quite dark whereas f/3.5 is about standard for most kit lenses even tho the 10-22 is not technically a ‘kit lens’... the counter argument is that the 10-18 has image stabilisation which would allow you shoot handheld at a slower shutter speed to get the extra light - that is no good for moving subjects though, so in that case the 10-22 is the one to go for. Hope that helped and have a great day! (Also be sure to subscribe for the 500 subs giveaway with more to come!)
Cool video man. Wondering what you would suggest between these two lenses for real estate. New too it but also wanna make something out of it. Using a Canon T6s and I do not own any wide angle lenses that I could use comfortably for wider angles. Maybe other brands beside canon that won't break the pocket if they're used.? Some said upgrade to full frame. Saving that for the future unless I stumble on something that doesn't seem too bad.
Hey there, thanks for dropping in... I shot real estate on a crop sensor with the 10-22 which I found to be sharper than the 10-18 and also suffered from less light flaring than the 10-18. The 10-22 had more green chromatic aberration but this was easy to remove in processing. I have a full frame EOS-R but I still use the crop sensor for real estate. Be sure to use a tripod and stop down to F/8'ish to ensure sharpness across the frame and sufficient depth of detail. Hope this helps and hear from you again!
Amigo estoy indeciso y hago fotografía de deportes, que lente debo comprar? Unos me dicen que me vaya por el 10-22 y otros por el 10-18 estoy confundido
my apologies, I should have uploaded the RAW images for comparison, in future maybe I will place a link into the comments for reference. Have a great day!
Haziq Ampuan Hey, I’m looking at both of these lenses to do my Real Estate Photography. So you are happy with the image quality of the 10-18mm over the 10-22 for sure?
Hey Haziq - thanks for the comment, and I would have to agree with you on that one. I think the 10-18 does take a bit more work to control flare and softness but if it can be stopped down and on a tripod it is sharp indeed. I hope you are well and thanks again for the comment. Take it easy.
Hi Falando, I will mention I found the image quality of the 10-18 to be overall better because although the 10-22 would show better clarity in focus it has heavy chromatic aberrations, both lenses could be better because 10-18 can have low contrast sometimes too.
Yes the 10-18 is good for vlogging and also for real estate, because for real estate you stop down to somewhere like F/8 - I did find that the 10-18 gave some unwanted flaring and can slightly wash out the image to soft particularly in the corners. The EF-M 11-22 is similarly suitable for vlog and for real estate as it has a wide enough field of view
Haha, yeah we have some shady cats around here, like anywhere I suppose. Definitely got me distracted cos I could see they were up to something. I hope you're well and sorry for the late reply, been busy times lately! Take care
I;m planning to buy EOS M but based on reviews, their native 11-22 lens is not that sharp. Is this 10-18 good for landscape ? I don't mind using adapter.
Hey there, the EF-M 11-22 is also quite pricey but wasn’t sure about it not being sharp, I guess this will be to the edges of the frame... the EFS 10-18 is very good for landscape, one thing is it does suffer flaring when sun is in front or off to side, but most wide angles will. I like the 10-18 but I’m sorry to say it’s not a super sharp lens either. Thanks for commenting and have a great week!
Hey there, thanks for the question and that is actually a harder one to answer than you might think. I believe I would go for the 10-18mm because of the IS which, although the lens is slower than the 10-22mm, can still give better low light performance and particularly for video, however the 10-22 can be slightly sharper if focused right. Thanks and have a great weekend!!!
TheOtherPhotoGuy NZ wouldn’t those be reasons to get the 10-22? Hah. Maybe I’ll go for whichever I can get cheaper if I can shave a few dollars in one. Is the IS all that useful though? Also it seems 18 has crisper corners so maybe that is the way to go. ?
Yes it does seem that way, but the 10-18 is more flexible across photo and video formats albeit sacrificing image quality. The 10-18 is the way to go here.
Hello :) I am looking for a good full frame lens for dope portraits and group photos, can you please help me with that and tell me which one is sharper ? If no one is can you suggest me a good one please ? ^^
@@Mya-Elba Okay nice, well I expect you probably have the EF50mm f1.8 which is full frame, which is not essential on the crop sensor camera you have but it is really great for portraits although quite tight at 85mm equivalent so you might have to stand back for group shots, but that's really a great option. A copy of the older 85mm f/1.8 is also a really great lens with a lot of character too but again at 136mm equivalent it is even tighter. You could look for a copy of the EF17-40 f/4L as they can be found relatively cheaply nowadays, but at F/4 you dont quite get the character or background blur in all situations. You could also consider the EF-S 24 f/2.8 pancake lens, it's a bit wider than the 50mm being a 35mm equiv and still quite fast at 2.8, I have no experience with that lens. If you have $$ to burn the EF 16-35 f/2.8 would be fantastic, as would the the Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 an amazing lens
@@TheOtherPhotoGuy Oh waw thank you so much for your answer, i already have the 50 and 85, both are dope but i have to step back too far to get the full body, I'll def give the 24mm a chance if it's wide and great sharpness, I ll give a chance to the RF 35mm F1.8 too I think...Thank you very very much ^^
@@Mya-Elba awesome good luck, there also the old EF 20mm f/2.8 but I did not like that lens, too much vignetting and not so crisp - do bear in mind the RF 35mm 1.8 whilst a great lens will not adapt to the EF mount. Let me know how you go please and thanks for dropping in.
mario cristobal collado aviles oh hey Mario you don’t need to be afraid, we’re all here to learn together and thanks for kindly differentiating that for me. Have a great weekend!
Okay mate, well this was years ago now so all good man, you make your own decisions but the pessimism will hold you back. Thanks for your constructive contribution and have a mega day today!
Hey there thanks for letting me know that appreciate it, I have made sure the audio balance is better on my more recent vids, feel free to check them into and thank you very much again.
I noticed some horrible distortion in the corners on the 10-22 shooting wide open. I mostly always stop down the lens which can deal with this but its interesting to note that the 10-18 performs better in this area, albeit it is a slower lens.
Great video. Thank you. I'm wondering do you think the image stabilizer is a huge difference to get the 10-18? I don't do videos and I have EOS 80d. Your input is greatly appreciated. I subscribed to your channel :)
I've shot with the 10-18mm for 3 years and the 10-22mm for 3 months and I can say there is definitely a slight sharpness improvement with the 22mm. Also, lens distortion in the 11-14mm range is slightly less significant on the 22mm. The 10-18mm is a very good lens, especially for the price, but I am confident there is an improvement with image quality with the 10-22mm.
Nice video. I watched this on Sunday May 23rd, then decided to buy my 10-18. I cannot understand why you don't have more subscribers. Keep making the videos.
Hey thanks alot for watching and for the comment, I'm glad you decided on a lens, have a great day and thanks again!
Mate, thank you SO much for putting this video together! How do you not have more subscribers!? I loved the video and your style... and more importantly, I can finally buy the 10-18 and get some rest because I haven't slept over a week analyzing the damn thing!
Oh hey thank you so much for the comment and hoping you are managing to do some photography or videos during this time in the world, very unusual! Thanks again and be well.
The Other Photo Guy I am actually. Started calling real estate agents to let me in vacant homes and it’s been great!
@@YouMadeItPolitical brilliant! Now that is what I call seizing the opportunity, good one mate!
The Other Photo Guy thanks man, you too!
holy crap this channel is so much smaller than I was expecting, I thought you were some big review channel haha. Great points, I have the 10-18mm and I was curious as to if I should buy the 10-22 but you just saved me a good half grand, thank you!
Abdulaziz seriously right?? He is amazing!
Wow thanks for the encouragement friend! I have to get some more videos up sometime soon and this is great motivation!
My 10-22 just came in the mail today.
Wow man captivating. 5 scenes per second average. You are a writer director actor and camera man very impressive.
? Got the 10 18mm. Anyone make a screw on linear non fisheye 67mm wide angle converter ? now that would be wide but extra weight could kill the auto focus motor so just manual focus.
Haha thank you so much, I'm just playing around having some fun! Hmm not sure about the wide angle converter, I have seen them for 58mm but not sure about 67mm, could be interesting!
Thanks, getting the 10-18 for sure now. The 10-22 looked terrible wide open and has some bad chromatic aberration as well. On top of that there is the price difference and the IS on the 10-18. No brainer if you ask me.
+Jeroen thanks for the consideration! The main difference is the IS for sure, especially for video work.. the main drawback is the f4.5 aperture on the 10-18 makes it quite dark but it still does a good job! Have a good one!!!
I bought the 10-22mm. I plan to use the lens in low light, so that extra stop of light will be more welcomed than stabilization. I have the canon m50 that has in body stabilization... I hope its enough to give me good pictures. At worse I will return it for the 10-18mm
All the best for that, I hope it goes well, should be all good at the wider focal length don’t require stabilisation quite as much. Thanks for commenting and hope you have a good one!
Oh yeah I agree the f3.5 is really noticeable difference to the 4.5, that’s the biggest downer, much better if the 10-18 was 3.5 or if they could put IS in the lens
Hey, I was wondering if the lens performed well with the m50 body since I have a m50 also and I am considering this lens. Is it good?
@@yanzun4291 it works very well for those super wide pictures. Not the best in low light.
Subscribed. I love how you keep it short and clear right at the end which one you are going to keep. Edit is crisp!
Hey Dinesh, thank you so much for watching and subscribing, wow I made this video a long time ago I hope I can have some more recent videos for you as well! I really appreciate your feedback and time, have a great day!
Thanks for sharing. I just bought one today, I’m glad I made the right choice 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
Awesome, great news and thanks for watching. Hope you have a great day today!
2022 and still a great video man
Phew, haha thanks so much! Bit old school looking back now, I appreciate your time!
I just bought the 10-18mm zoom. It appears I made the right choice. I have a few pictures taken already and looking forward to more.
Nice one David! It’s an enjoyable lens to use at that widest focal length, I hope you get plenty of enjoyment from it. Have a cool day!
I have been struggling with deciding what wide angle canon lens I should get. I have been bidding on 2nd hand canon 10-18 as the 10-22 are much pricier. I have a sigma 10-20 wide angle 1:4-5.6 but its a lot heavier and no IS - I'm keen to get a decent wide angle I can use mainly outdoors with a glidecam - I recently got a Samyang 14mm F2.8 but it also has no IS and is a manual lens - this lens I got for wide angle in low light but I am keen on the 10-18 Canon as it appears to be much lighter and compact. Great comparison and after seeing your vid I'm definitely going for the 10-18 Canon
Hey Patrick, thanks a lot for the detailed comment and I follow your thought process. The main fault I find on the 10-18 having used it for quite a bit longer now is the flaring and loss of contrast in challenging light, you will need to set up your shooting angle to compensate or deflect the light, otherwise it certainly is light and compact but in saying that I have given mine some pretty rugged treatment and it holds up pretty well. Hey thanks again for dropping in and for the sub, and have a great week coming up!
Very nice video comparing the two lenses. I'm trying to find out what's best for my 90D. Also, you're pretty funny lmao.
Hey thanks a lot for that feedback... the 90D looks awesome, I have an 80D and an R but I’m keen on a 90 to update... cheers again and let me know what you decide!
Great Video, this will be interesting! Thank for your feedback Corey!
Cheers Tony, woah this one is old, embarrassing to watch now haha. Hey thanks and have a great rest of the week Tony
Thank you for this great video, I was thinking to upgrade my 10-18mm but I think am going to continue with the 10-18mm , the quality on the 10-22mm not convince me. Thank you again 👍
Hey Jose, Hope you are well in these strange times for the whole planet. Apologies for the late reply and thanks for the comment. I would agree with you on your decision, only to say that neither lens is perfect but overall the 10-18 is the better performer, if only they could Blend the lenses together so it was an affordable 10-22 with STM motor and IS, now that would be fun. Thanks again and stay well.
Just the review I’ve been looking for and a terrific video presentation. Subscribed mate 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻🇬🇧
Hey Paul, thanks for the feedback and the encouragement, really appreciate the sub and hope you have an awesome week! 🇳🇿
I can tell you are a good canon salesman.
Thanks hahaha !
Great video!! Thanks for helping me decide👍🏻👍🏻
Thank you for that and have a great day! It’s raining cats and dogs where I am right now but I hope you have better conditions for shooting!
Hey, fellow kiwi here. Thanks for the review, in the market for these 2 lenses great to see your mahi!
Hey awesome thanks heaps for the feedback and also for watching. Have a great week this week and catch you next time!
Hi, cool video! It came at a perfect time as I'm looking at which one of these wide angle lenses to put on my 90D for landscapes. They will be on a tripod so IS is not really a contributing factor for my needs. So would you say I'd be better off with the 22mm seeing it will always be on a tripod? Keen to hear your opinion. Thanks!
Hey there, thanks for the comment. If you are doing landscapes and will keep it on a tripod the 10-22 is the better option, with much cleaner photos. Try to find one you can hold before you buy. If the body is still rigid and tight you’re good, if it feels a bit loose or sloppy then the lens is moving around and some corners could be blurry.
@@TheOtherPhotoGuy Brilliant! Thank you so much for your advice. I've subscribed to your channel and look forward to watching some more of your videos! Have a great day. 😊
@@angiesutherland8740 hey thanks so much!!! I really appreciate that and will hope to hear from you again!
This guy is awesome! I am only 2 minutes in yet ...
😹😹😹🙌
Actually I do buy it for closer to the 18 and 22 for some various stylized portraits on my crop sensor :)
Ah true, that’s good to know and that means you are making the most of the lens, nice one! Thanks for watching and have a great day!
Hi. I'm a beginner and still on the learning curve about lenses. I know that the 10-22 has higher maximum aperture of F 3.5 than the F 4-5 in 10-18. I would like to ask if this slight difference would really be significant factor under low light? Thanks
Hey Jessa, thanks for checking out the vid and for the question... in short my answer is yes it does make a noticeable difference in low light having the extra 2/3 stops of light at the same shutter speeds... f/4.5 can be quite dark whereas f/3.5 is about standard for most kit lenses even tho the 10-22 is not technically a ‘kit lens’... the counter argument is that the 10-18 has image stabilisation which would allow you shoot handheld at a slower shutter speed to get the extra light - that is no good for moving subjects though, so in that case the 10-22 is the one to go for. Hope that helped and have a great day! (Also be sure to subscribe for the 500 subs giveaway with more to come!)
Great question and answer
Para deportes es preferible el 10-22???@@TheOtherPhotoGuy
This was sooo helpful. Thank you!!!
Oh thanks heaps for that! I hope you are all good and have a great weekend! Hear from you again and cheers!
Cool video man. Wondering what you would suggest between these two lenses for real estate. New too it but also wanna make something out of it. Using a Canon T6s and I do not own any wide angle lenses that I could use comfortably for wider angles. Maybe other brands beside canon that won't break the pocket if they're used.? Some said upgrade to full frame. Saving that for the future unless I stumble on something that doesn't seem too bad.
Hey there, thanks for dropping in... I shot real estate on a crop sensor with the 10-22 which I found to be sharper than the 10-18 and also suffered from less light flaring than the 10-18. The 10-22 had more green chromatic aberration but this was easy to remove in processing. I have a full frame EOS-R but I still use the crop sensor for real estate. Be sure to use a tripod and stop down to F/8'ish to ensure sharpness across the frame and sufficient depth of detail. Hope this helps and hear from you again!
Amigo estoy indeciso y hago fotografía de deportes, que lente debo comprar? Unos me dicen que me vaya por el 10-22 y otros por el 10-18 estoy confundido
Habe vergebens auf Vergleichsfotos gewartet die du beim Sonnenuntergang am Strand geschossen hast
my apologies, I should have uploaded the RAW images for comparison, in future maybe I will place a link into the comments for reference. Have a great day!
great review ... you convince me Thanks
Amazing videos mate, i bought both lenses. For my perspective 10-18 perform better than 10-22 for my real estate photos.
Haziq Ampuan Hey, I’m looking at both of these lenses to do my Real Estate Photography. So you are happy with the image quality of the 10-18mm over the 10-22 for sure?
Hey Haziq - thanks for the comment, and I would have to agree with you on that one. I think the 10-18 does take a bit more work to control flare and softness but if it can be stopped down and on a tripod it is sharp indeed. I hope you are well and thanks again for the comment. Take it easy.
Hi Falando, I will mention I found the image quality of the 10-18 to be overall better because although the 10-22 would show better clarity in focus it has heavy chromatic aberrations, both lenses could be better because 10-18 can have low contrast sometimes too.
Is good to use it at real state for videos and photos?
Is 10-18 it can be use for vblog, and real state for pictures and videos? Or Ef-m 11-22mm can also be use for real state and youtube ?
Yes the 10-18 is good for vlogging and also for real estate, because for real estate you stop down to somewhere like F/8 - I did find that the 10-18 gave some unwanted flaring and can slightly wash out the image to soft particularly in the corners. The EF-M 11-22 is similarly suitable for vlog and for real estate as it has a wide enough field of view
@@TheOtherPhotoGuy thank you.
Seems like 10-22mm has a slight chromatic aberration I agree
Good review.
Thank you! Have great week!
@@TheOtherPhotoGuy I ended up buying the 10-18! Mainly for the IS for video.
"Taking photos of the wall, mate?"
hahaha
Haha, yeah we have some shady cats around here, like anywhere I suppose. Definitely got me distracted cos I could see they were up to something. I hope you're well and sorry for the late reply, been busy times lately! Take care
Chur. Cheers from Switzerland
Hey thanks a lot! All good and have an awesome day!
Is the 10-18 zoom in and out smoothly for video?
Yep sure is, if you do it controlled manner.
I;m planning to buy EOS M but based on reviews, their native 11-22 lens is not that sharp. Is this 10-18 good for landscape ? I don't mind using adapter.
Hey there, the EF-M 11-22 is also quite pricey but wasn’t sure about it not being sharp, I guess this will be to the edges of the frame... the EFS 10-18 is very good for landscape, one thing is it does suffer flaring when sun is in front or off to side, but most wide angles will. I like the 10-18 but I’m sorry to say it’s not a super sharp lens either. Thanks for commenting and have a great week!
@@TheOtherPhotoGuy thank you
If the price is equal on both, what would you suggest between the two for a first and only wide angle?
Hey there, thanks for the question and that is actually a harder one to answer than you might think. I believe I would go for the 10-18mm because of the IS which, although the lens is slower than the 10-22mm, can still give better low light performance and particularly for video, however the 10-22 can be slightly sharper if focused right. Thanks and have a great weekend!!!
TheOtherPhotoGuy NZ wouldn’t those be reasons to get the 10-22? Hah. Maybe I’ll go for whichever I can get cheaper if I can shave a few dollars in one. Is the IS all that useful though? Also it seems 18 has crisper corners so maybe that is the way to go. ?
Yes it does seem that way, but the 10-18 is more flexible across photo and video formats albeit sacrificing image quality. The 10-18 is the way to go here.
I don’t think stabilization is great enough of difference to be considered a plus in the 10-18.
WoodshavenPatriot Fair enough! Thanks a lot for mentioning it and have a great day!
A Great review about the lens in a well presented video! Thanks for this!
You are super cool
Hey Sam! Thanks a lot for the encouragement that’s awesome mate! Have a choice day!
Hello :) I am looking for a good full frame lens for dope portraits and group photos, can you please help me with that and tell me which one is sharper ? If no one is can you suggest me a good one please ? ^^
Hey Mya, I'll try to help, which mount do you have, is it for EF-S, EF, EF-M or RF?
@@TheOtherPhotoGuy Oh thank you ^^I have a 850D EF-S
@@Mya-Elba Okay nice, well I expect you probably have the EF50mm f1.8 which is full frame, which is not essential on the crop sensor camera you have but it is really great for portraits although quite tight at 85mm equivalent so you might have to stand back for group shots, but that's really a great option. A copy of the older 85mm f/1.8 is also a really great lens with a lot of character too but again at 136mm equivalent it is even tighter. You could look for a copy of the EF17-40 f/4L as they can be found relatively cheaply nowadays, but at F/4 you dont quite get the character or background blur in all situations. You could also consider the EF-S 24 f/2.8 pancake lens, it's a bit wider than the 50mm being a 35mm equiv and still quite fast at 2.8, I have no experience with that lens. If you have $$ to burn the EF 16-35 f/2.8 would be fantastic, as would the the Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 an amazing lens
@@TheOtherPhotoGuy Oh waw thank you so much for your answer, i already have the 50 and 85, both are dope but i have to step back too far to get the full body, I'll def give the 24mm a chance if it's wide and great sharpness, I ll give a chance to the RF 35mm F1.8 too I think...Thank you very very much ^^
@@Mya-Elba awesome good luck, there also the old EF 20mm f/2.8 but I did not like that lens, too much vignetting and not so crisp - do bear in mind the RF 35mm 1.8 whilst a great lens will not adapt to the EF mount. Let me know how you go please and thanks for dropping in.
I'm afraid to tell you that telephoto lenses and wide angle lenses are two different things
mario cristobal collado aviles oh hey Mario you don’t need to be afraid, we’re all here to learn together and thanks for kindly differentiating that for me. Have a great weekend!
If you stop getting your viewers seesick over an imagestabilzer, I might consider subscribing, but I doubt you will
Okay mate, well this was years ago now so all good man, you make your own decisions but the pessimism will hold you back. Thanks for your constructive contribution and have a mega day today!
funny guy
Hey cheers matye!
Your background music is very loud and i cant hear you easly
Hey there thanks for letting me know that appreciate it, I have made sure the audio balance is better on my more recent vids, feel free to check them into and thank you very much again.
It sounds great, maybe knock down 2db on the audio max