Family Law Contempt of Court Issues
Vložit
- čas přidán 25. 04. 2024
- In this 1-hour webinar, appellate expert Liisa Speaker and guest hosts, Judge Carla Testani and Judge Kent Engle, discuss Family Law Contempt of Court Issues.
Guests:
Judge Carla Testani, 3rd Circuit Court
Judge Kent Engle, 20th Circuit Court
Watch all our family law webinars: rb.gy/l4rvn2
✨Why does "case law" need to be hard fought before it's brick wall, hard pressed, & fully comprehended as TRUTH & FACT to the Best Interests that we "Do NOT change Custody or Suspend Time (sever attachment bonds) without a full trial??
It's such a catastrophic and debased error that validates & affirms the polar opposite of best interests resulting in the worst possible interests and more harm than any good!
We're too far, & too long into this "branch of law" to still be playing pass the ball. Trans generational trauma in family systems is so painful & damning on a depth to core soul impact affecting all of humanity & our continuity.
✨🙏🏽✨
The third question about visitation orders> They all wanted to say is it themother or the father? Mother do nothing, father arrest him.
I have A.
Question, even if the judges are the judges sometimes to the parents don't have enough money to pay for the attorney. Why won't they listen because the other parent ends up alienating the child because they mostly abused the other parent to appoint. Were there no longer able to defend themselves and be an involved in the child's life? Why? Why? Why don't they listen? Cause it's not because we're calling them names as judges, but because we want them to listen, because we want to be involved in the child's life. Whether we did something wrong or not. I wonder they don't listen.Not because we're being mean to a show but we're trying to show them evidence of what the other parent has done The?
Other parent don't want the other parent to defend its involvement inside the child's life.Why emotionally abuses the parent to words?Unable to defend its own identity of being involved inside the child's life as co Parent Emotionally abusive sexual cohesion is a crime I wonder why the judge don't let us show them Because sometimes the parent is emotionally abusing the child. And the mother in front of the child are the other parent in front of the child and they try to get it to work. It's not the other defendant is not able to defend it so and try to say that the other parent doesn't want to be involved in the other child's life instead of the other parent trying to defend itself From within its own identity without the other parent impersonating the other criminally impersonateteing parents identity With?
Out them trying to silence their voice and not being involved in their child's life
Because they don't care about the child or the other parent. All they care about it the money. If they can remove one parent from from a childs life then they cN issue a title IV D order in which the state profits from. Title IV D is a contract through the welfare act giving one parent government funds. They then turn around and collect money from the other parent as profit with incentives...
EXACTLY czcams.com/video/tecX9fTMmi8/video.html
You should proofread your comment before positing it- it’s all over the place and impossible to piece together.
A judge won’t listen to anyone hostile or unable to control their emotional state. Given the comment I see here, it’s safe to say your emotions need checked.
File a motion and try again. That’s all you can do really. Lose your sh*t, you’ll lose your kid.
@@ArtAbsurdist I was about to say the same thing ,Unfortunately even a person showing no emotional distress will still be told to say nothing.
I've gotten to the point i pray the judge ask if i have something to say even then it's shot down because there is no excuse good enough for why they can't get money from you or no excuse why you lost work and got behind in their world they treat it like a credit card when it's a human being and this is where it's morally wrong.
The reality of the situation is these people don't care because they didn't get effected (Your Situation) like others have and this is why you have people with no Sympathy or Empathy towards a man in this situation they automatically assume you don't want to pay or trying to get out of the obligation when it really is you have no resources and can't make what needs to happen happen....
Most Alienated parents are the ultimate losers in the end and nobody cares about the emotional rollercoaster the other parent endured both by State Government and the Custodial Parent especially being labeled a Deadbeat and excommunicated from the very person you had a child with and in turn the child as well.
Can I request that a judge hold someone in contempt for every time that they've been proven to have lied in their written statements/motions & under oath in person?
I always thought that a judge would hold someone in contempt for perjury if they lied to them &or refused to comply with court orders. Especially at a certain point & if that individual continues to file motions & bring the other party to court based on statements that were proved to be lies.
But what do I do as an individual without representation?
Also, shouldn't a judge hold an attorney in contempt for screaming at them & telling them that their ruling is absurd?
Or could I ask that a judge hold an attorney in contempt for that?
What could I do if an attorney knowingly & willingly lies on their clients behalf about under the table income when just weeks prior, on record in custody court, they admitted to them having multiple incomes?
DoJudges think about What's the overall positive outcome using contempt taking a person's freedom due to income inability to comply. If someone had a job they definitely lost it, you add an arrest on their record, suspend dl and while in jail loose their residence and everything that goes along with that scenario. Now the person comes out of jail in worst financial situation because of Contempt no job, place to live, no money and a arrest on background still unable to pay child support. This contempt power has now destroyed this person. Does the court consider their action. What about hearing officers signing orders on behalf of judge that it says the judge is to review all orders that have his signature especially on contempt order.
1) Family Law "court" is private and it's purpose is to create contracts/agreements:
2) Family Law "judges" are administrative law judges "ALJ" not judicial:
3) Administrative law judges shall conduct themselves in GOOD BEHAVIOR. Threatening violence is not in good behavior:
4) ALJ cannot be a victim, witness and adjudicate the alleged "contempt"
People, stay out of these courts and manage your own family affairs!