The Scars Of The Great War In Western Europe | The Long Shadow (1/3) | Timeline
Vložit
- čas přidán 26. 06. 2024
- Marking the centenary of World War One, historian David Reynolds explores the enduring shadow the conflict has cast over Britain and Europe in the century that followed. Travelling to locations across Europe, from Slovenia to the Sudetenland, Belfast to Berlin, David Reynolds traces the war’s legacy, arguing that it unleashed forces we still grapple with today. This remarkable series also looks again at how the experience of war haunted the generation who lived through it, in particular the soldiers who survived it - dynamic characters such as Benito Mussolini, Eamon de Valera, Philippe Petain, James Ramsey MacDonald and Thomas Masaryk. Reynolds examines how these men shaped the peace that followed war, often in unpredictable ways.
It's like Netflix for history... Sign up to History Hit, the world's best history documentary service, at a huge discount using the code 'TIMELINE' ---ᐳ bit.ly/3a7ambu
You can find more from us on:
/ timelinewh
/ timelinewh
This channel is part of the History Hit Network. Any queries, please contact owned-enquiries@littledotstudios.com
Use code 'timeline' and enjoy 3 months of History Hit for $3 bit.ly/TimelineWatchMore
Britain allied with the Soviet union that slaughtered millions prior to the war, terrorized their populations and took over and imprisoned with communism half of Europe. This narrative lies by omission of Britain's major ally, the Soviet Union and its acts of agression against other countries.
Perception?
PART ONE: TO START A WAR...
www.corbettreport.com/wwi/
National socialism is not right wing
Professor David Reynolds will always be one of my favourite Historians. I can’t help but to listen to every words he said.
Is he the narrator for 'WW2 - WAR STORY' (2022) with LIAM DALE?, thanks.
Same here. Along with Suzanna, Tony Robinson, Bethany Hughes, and Dr. Helen Castor.
David Reynolds - He is one of the world’s most acclaimed diplomatic historians, and a former winner of the Wolfson Prize for History. His voice gives drama and conviction to Timeline.
This should be required learning in schools around the world
Thats what im doing right now...
The reason why is because they want you to believe ww2 is the deadliest war
I 100% agree!
yes
Indeed.
What I've found matters most is what that touches us personally. My great aunt's husband was gassed in the trenches in 1917 and came home permanently disabled and died as a result of his injuries in 1923. While I never knew him as I was born 33 years after his death every Memorial Day we spent at my aunt's house as it was a day they truly would spend remembering those had passed on before us and as a result I still remember his pictures and the regimental photo taken before they went over to France.
VetteKid I honor your uncle for his service.
@SURREY CROSSING This is actually the point the guy in the documentary makes at the end. What's the point of 'remembering' the dead when it does nothing to inform the present. Plenty of warmongering still going on that very few have anything to say about.
Reynolds is a fantastic historian.
One of the best.
I enjoy his stuff. Good work
It's a really good doc. The only thing that's leaves me wanting more is he doesn't let you know his own view on it. Its more about, this is how people looked on it in the 1920s, here's an important play from the 1930s, here's how WWII lead to a changing view of WWI, here's the contrast between British and German attitudes in the 1920s. Its not till the final 5 minutes he starts to give his own view by rejecting the anti-war poetry and plays as the main lense we should view history through.
I like how this documentary acknowledges how malleable the past is, it's a work of reconstruction; it reminds us that we don't have direct access to 'the past' in some magical sense; history is not a record of the past it's an interpretation.
the victors write the history - they say
Touche
@@antigen4 This is a popular phrase and I want to challenge it because it gravely underestimates the problem. If this is true how then are we to account for the success of the published memoirs of the defeated German Generals after WW2? It seems to me that history is written by the defeated too.
In fact history is written by anyone who cares to write it, but it is called into being by an audience and is, therefore, very much the servant of ever changing contemporary needs.
History was once a narrative of political power exercised by the elite but as society democratised there was more appetite for a broader social understanding of the experience which included the 'common man' (emphasis on man). This has of course evolved into an even broader history which includes women (whatever next!).
I think we experience a real need to understand the past since it informs and shapes the present, in the words of Albert Camus "history is like a rudder of a boat, although it lies behind us it determines where we are going".
The need to understand the past and inform ourselves of what truly happened means that history written solely at the service of a narrow and exclusionary narrative will not suffice.
@@colin2709 well perhaps those 'published memoirs' served a purpose for those that write the larger history? who knows. If there is a more appropriate popular phrase please let us know. it seemed expedient at the time.
@@antigen4 It's a cliché, and a bad one at that.
As a history buff, I came to the conclusion that WWI indeed was a seminal event of the 20th century and WWII was simply the second part of that war. Thanks for this great documentary, which should be titled "Part 1" of the series.
for the USA the Great War did not end with its sequel, WW2; there was the Korean war, the Viet Nam War, the other cold war flare ups, that all were, like WW2, the settling of scores resulting from a botched "peace" by the victors, especially USA, and to this day some of the lingering "scores" have still to be settled e.g. Korea, Japan's Kurile Islands, Taiwan and its offshore Islands of Quemoy, and Matsu, etc.
That's right somehow. WW1 was the initial catastrophe of the last century, WW2 was a result of it, and so was the cold war with its proxy wars in Korea and Vietnam.
Marshall Foch famously said of the Versailles Treaty, "This is not peace. It is an armistice for 20 years."
I am a bit of a history buff (so much to learn), and I believe that the Vietnam War, if presented as a necessity, would have been a success at home.
Well, WWI actually brought the 20th century in Europe (ancient dynasties seemed to live in opulence while squeezing dry the wealth of the land of the people they had nothing in common with). It was a revolt the ruling class didn't think the ruled class dared to engage in.
My great uncle served at Passchendaele, Loos, and Salonika, but never returned. My great grandfather, who fought in the Passchendaele offensive, who had suffered the squalor of the trenches, undergone hand to hand trench fighting with the Germans, gone over the top on numerous occasions and survived the war, had the following brief views. World War One should never be called that. It should be called nothing more than a carnage, a sheer slaughter of good men on both sides. Most staff Generals were cavalry officers and dunder heads operating on old defunk tactics of a bygone age in a modern mechanised war. There were some exceptions, but in the main their solution to any problem was men, more men, more men, and yet more men, throwing lives away like glass bottles against a brick wall. The armistice was not a surrender but a twenty year peace, and round two was yet to come. Why could they not have settled it like this at the outset? After all of their sacrifice, the allied armies never marched into Germany at the end of the war, and the Germans took the view that they had never lost the war. If that had been done, then perhaps defeat would have been instilled in all Germans, and WW2 would have not have come about. And yet my great grandfather reported that the German soldiers were surrendering in droves well before the armistice. They were done. They had had a gut full of the war. The UK was supposed to be a land fit for the heros of WW1 to return to. Instead, after giving their all, they returned to nothing but unemployment, poverty, starvation, pity and a paltry veterans pension overseen by Haig who was supposedly 'going to make sure the men were taken care of'. What BS. Most war pensions were paid at a rate two ranks below that served in the conflict. That was their reward for having fought so courageously and valiantly in conditions so appalling that we cannot even begin to imagine in that stinking damn slaughter. Because of the Pals battalions, many streets were devoid of all their men, most of which had been killed as they had served, together. Some men talked, others not at all, but most would bottle it up and only let slip about their experiences on rare occasions, because the normal person could neither imagine nor believe what they had endured. Men without limbs, scared, men psychologically unhinged, men gassed. My great grandfather endured endless remorse for killing fathers, husbands, sons, sweethearts who had never done him any harm, tears streaming down his face recounting shooting and bayoneting old and young German soldiers alike, not to mention the loss of his own mates. For him, and many of the lads, the war never ended. They lived it day by day, even when they returned. And a final statement: In future leave soldiers and civilians out of war. If two monarchs want to wage war, put the gloves on them, and then put them in a boxing ring and let them sort it out between themselves. How was it that the Kaiser was allowed to live after this? Because he was the grandson of Queen Victoria? Why was it he, Erich Ludendorff and Paul von Hindenburg, who had presided over the atrocities of the German army, were never hung? Bloody mass murderers!
Your great grandfather **should** have felt remorse. He was on the wrong side. The Germans did (almost) nothing wrong in WW1 and the German Emperor was not in any way an evil man or a criminal. A spoiled man who wasn't terribly competent and who was very out of touch with the common man, sure.
Blame France and Russia, blame the UK, blame the US. Blame Belgium for preventing Germany for letting Germany beat back the aggressive French fast enough to get the war over with quickly. Blame Serbia for starting the whole mess. But don't blame Germany. They were actually just defending themselves against foreign aggression.
@@peterfireflylund I would not go so far as to say that Germany was blameless. They did *choose* to attack a neutral country. Belgium.
What is true, and what history tries to forget is that this was was planned for and desired by mainly France.
The aims for the war parties were as follows:
France: recapture areas the lost in 1870s to germany. Areas that before Louis XIV (IIRC) were not even french.
UK: Eliminate the german fleet, for the strain of their fleet requirements was killing their economy (their requirements was to have a fleet bigger than the numbers 2 and 3).
Italy: conquer the german speaking province of Tirol from austria Hungary, and the dalmatian coast.
Russia: obtain ice free harbours, mainly access to the mediteranean from the black sea
Germany: To keep their only ally, and survive their encirclement.
Austria-Hungary: To stamp out the serbian state that had killed thier crown prince and wive and was instrumental to state supported terrorrism.
Turkey: The sick man of europe: Survive against russia. they may also have had dreams of resurrecting the power of the ottoman empire on the balkans.
Look at the aims of the parties, and from the aims, extrapolate who really *wanted* the war.
Ever since the 1870s one of the main focus of French foreign policy was "la ligne bleue" (the blue line on the horizon of the hils Elsas-Lotharingen). Much of French foreign poilicy was focussed on isolating Germany and starting a new war on favorable terms for France. For this reason they started alliances with both Russia (a sometimes french ally) and the UK (a traditional french enemy).
They did find a willing ear in Sir Edward Grey, who worked out details on Anglo-French cooperation in war. When questioned by parliament he would lie and deny any agreements were in place. Meanwhile there was a detailed timetable for moblilisation including arrival times for ferries from the UK and trains into france.
He (Grey) did wish to pacify the Agadir crisis, but that was because he felt the UK wasn't ready.
Lord Haldane was sent to Germany in 1912 to open a discussion on a naval treaty. If you read modern day recount you will read that it was a failed negotiation (encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Haldane+Mission+of+1912) because of "the profound differences between Great Britain and Germany".
What is not told is that Haldane was sent to Germany with instruction from Grey that there would be no treaty.\
Pure windowdressing.
Not to say that Germany did not go stupidly into the situation. To put the situation under pressure their parliament accepted a fleet building programme (which was financially impossible, but who cared). Part of this was posturing so they could easily make concessions in respect to this plan in the negotiations, instead of concessions in relation to the current fleet size. If actually fit british desire perfectly, for it gave them a legitimate excuse for not succeeding.
@@peterfireflylund - Repeat the lie of Germany as a peaceful, unfortunate victim of World War One often enough, and the sheeple will begin to believe it.
@@sirierieott5882 first class historians, like Stephen Kotkin, are saying that everyone was to blame for ww1, especially the brits.
@@DerDop All could have done more to avoid war. Invading Belgium was unambiguous, however.
My great grandfather who fought in France all through (yep, an old contemptible) said the war was nothing but a giant blood sacrifice. He made no distinction between the two wars either. He said it was one with fresh young men reared for the second half. Being in the trenches, I think he needed to find a reason for it. Banks and blood were his conclusion...a giant sacrifice for a few greedy people.
I don't think it's that clear cut, but it was a bloody awful waste of life for...what? Two of my great grandfathers fought in the trenches. One of them manned a machine gun. I sometimes wonder how many men he killed, and how he lived with it afterwards. The curious thing was, he was a mild mannered sort of guy, not a psycho, not a born killer. I imagine he was fairly typical. How did this happen? I'm not sure there are any simple answers.
@@paulwhite6745 "One of them manned a machine gun. I sometimes wonder how many men he killed, and how he lived with it afterwards."
Machine gunners rarely actually saw the people they killed, believe it or not. Their function was mainly to lay down suppressive fields of fire at ranges long enough that individuals would not be distinguishable. It was the WW1 equivalent of dropping bombs from 10,000 feet. Very disconnected emotionally from the business end.
The fallout of the war is what is important, it may have inadvertently sped up the rise of the USA and modern Liberal Democracy. 4 empires vanished and the other 2 went broke, Germany became a powder keg to start the next war and nobody cared.
and there still doing it.
One of the best history documentary series on you tube. It's refreshing to hear a british historian unbridled by xenophobia in this day and age. Very well done and I would like to see more from this historian in the future as he has a very independent and discerning viewpoint. Bravo.
I am an American and we'd never see this good a documentary on our tv. Most americans have no idea about history, much less WWI. I wish they would do something like this here.
A student of WWI, I happened on Journeys End in 2006 on Broadway. I knew nothing about the author of play. What a powerful statement!! The theater was packed! It was a New York theater going crowd. Most did not know much about WWI. But they love theater. It was serendipity!
I don't know where this stuff came from. Yes, I know it's British, and all that. But this sudden eruption of quality documentaries is very exciting, most welcome and for a documentary junkie like me, it's the surprise of the year. TIMELINE is BOSS.
Timeline is quality docs so is "Frontline" "Nova" and "'American Experience".If you see any of those terms in the title they will be well produced.
As long as you realize that they dont always tell the truth! Frontline tends to be a bit more agenda driven but they are all nice productions.
Thanks, John. I gravitate to Documentaries, which do not violate copyright standards. I know a lot of people are getting away with posting their CD's. Perhaps "Frontline" "Nova" and "'American Experience" have official channels on CZcams. I will look for them. Historian David Reynolds is satisfying my peculiar itch for that in-depth British perspective, in the vein of the great Richard Holmes.
As he says, anniversaries have media pay attention.
But given that those who remember either World War are gone and their children are making many of the same mistakes, it is good to learn from history and look at it again.
@88Gibson LesPaul Reynolds, in his work, seems to be intent upon providing, most of all, the context of history. None better I've seen. Enjoy also, his droll British archness.
Excellent! Thank you for uploading this fine documentary! I appreciate the host especially!
Timeline really tells it like it is. More Americans need to see these documentaries, they show that to forget history we're condemned to relive it! The British aren't afraid to look at their past I wish a lot of Americans shared this trait.
This docu is as English as it gets. Great work lads!
rule brittania!
"...I speak of great heroic days, of victory and might
I hold a banner drenched in blood, I urge you to be brave
I lead you to your destiny, I lead you to your grave..."
Whose poetry is it, if I may know?
Simply an incredibly delicious listening treat... this narrator makes all his commentaries enjoyable.
"War is the failure of reason." - G. Orwell.
Love David! You can tell he's passionate about what he speaks of. And that makes it all the more interesting!
I’m also interested in how our perception of penicillin has molded over time.
You are a genius
Ww1 and 2 were the same war with a break in the middle. Then again could argue the cold war started in 1918 with ww2 being a break.
That would be true according to American newspapers. They only have the exact same ploy in both time periods.
Check Dan Carlin’s hardcore history podcast on the First World War. Argument could be made that the terrorist assassination by a seemingly nobody of archduke franz Ferdinand created the war on terrorism here in the 21st century.
Prof. Reynolds is great. I've only been recently exposed to his television work. He is one of the few historians who has the gravitas and credibility to add his own editorial commentary to his TV presentations.
Fantastic documentary Thanks for sharing! woohoo!
This is one of the most interesting and insightful documentaries about the `world war century' I have seen. Tremendous research on both a broad scale and yet of the significant minutiae. It certainly helps to put both wars - and many social issues - into a focused and great narrative.
I really appreciate the narrators effort to bring this history alive through his storytelling. Very effective.
As a presenter of history of the first half of the century, this man has few equals. He takes a broad overview and makes it obtainable to the many in a most paletable, comprehensive manner.
David Reynolds’ commentary and delivery is simply spectacular… ear candy 😅
Thank you so much for uploading these wonderful documentaries.
Thank you for sharing this video. We all see history with a twist.
I never heard of David Reynolds before I started watching his documentaries on CZcams. Every single documentary of his is superb - informative and fascinating.
Always enjoy shows hosted by Proff. David Reynolds
My grandfather was a battlefield surgeon in France. Nasty business . Came back to Brooklyn and practiced (as a GP) for 45 Years. War shaped him as a man
Highly recommended: A book, "Report on the Medico-Military Aspects of the European War". It's a highly detailed account of the situation, in France in early 1915, faced by the French doctors and the wounded. Horrifying. Written by Surgeon A.M. Fauntleroy, the head of surgery at Annapolis, who was sent over to France to compile the official report (for the U.S. Navy), which was then published, later in 1915, for American military-medico people. The U.S. must have known even then that it would enter the war eventually.
For 6 months service.
It was also stemmed on by the gigantic class division. The Russian revolution sparked fears in the aristocracy throughout Europe and workers were beginning to demand better wages in Europe and the USA
My maternal grandfather who immigrated from what is now the Czech Republic to the U.S.A. served 7 years in the American Army. He was sent to France in 1917 to fight with the Allies. Our family was very proud of him.
For the man who narated this video, may i say that there is a very true saying that upholds the idea that we should remember the fallen of ww1 as much as those of ww2, the saying goes" The day we forget the happenings of these two conflicts and the suffering caused to so many is the day we leave ourselves open to making the same mistake again.
My I add that a look at todays effects of a war, only add more substance to being vigilant and making sure that nobody ever takes the world into such conflict ever again, but have the common sence to singal out those who would involve themselves in such action, and insist they carry out their wishes against each other rather than use everyone else to determin the rights and wrongs of their beliefs, let them learn what their actions mean in a very personal way, and leave the rest of the world in peace.
FACT: The Corfu crisis of 1923 wasn't successfully dealt with by the League of Nations. They tried to convince Italy to pull out, but Mussolini refused. The matter was settled by the Conference of Ambassadors, which made a separate agreement with Italy. True story.
Well done Timeline for putting some great material up and some of it ad free! We're very lucky!
Agreed, Matthew. There is always more ro learn about mistake and possibilities when you examine history from new perspectives. Brilliant insight and presentation.
An incredibly insightful documentary. Thank you.
Very recommendable!
Excellent. Great research. Some good comments below too, peppered as usual with unsupportable opinions and bias from those who think they know more. Appreciate the upload. Thank you
such a well done program, the period in between the wars is more interesting than the wars themselves. there is much to be learned, but the lessons are unfortunately ignored, only leading into more conflicts.
Fanatastic. Thanks for this!
Deeply thought provoking.
We remember them..
Grate documentary......about grate war.....thank you timeline ..
Excellent documentary.
love these docs. musnt forget.
He said it's time to let go of the war dead. Sounds like forgetting.Catch the last four minutes.
We have already forgotten. If we didn’t, if we learned “the lessons”, then we would have truly backed the UN and never fought another war again.
Now people think this war was fought for their right to express “freedom” bu not wearing a mask, by suppressing voters and allowing Murdoch media to educate us.
No...we learned very little...
OH YES I LOVE DAVID REYNOLDS
Spike same
that kid with the mets hat g
Said that as I clicked on this video. 🙂
Yes indeed young man David Reynolds rocks.Wish he would do more documentaries and books.
You are a man of most excellent taste.
Take care Angie
Excellent documentary!
I've watched this series 4 times now I think. It is one of the best explanation of this time that I have seen.
A 1066 moment for Britain and completely unnecessary !
Britain had no need to involved in a German Russian war centred on the Balkans
No need at all !
They did tho of Germany won it would mean Britain was no longer the world super power and Germany’s navy would have kept growing
Well done. It is interesting to see how each generation has remembered The Great War/The World War/The War to End All Wars/The Big One/The First World War. I wonder how WWII will be remembered a century later when all living memory of it is gone.
It will be blamed on immigrants
Depends on who wins the current civil war. If the Dems win it it'll be looked upon as the last capitalist war in which everyone who fought (except the Russians and Chinese) was a war criminal not unlike those who fought for the Confederacy. If the Reps win, it'll be (like today) largely ignored except for "X day" sales, picnics and other family whodahs.
@@indy_go_blue6048 Better the Reps who seemed content on letting the general public go about with how it is remembered than the Dems who will outright rewrite it in their image.
@@indy_go_blue6048 who are these dems you speak of? I don’t know a single democrat who views WW2 the way you suggest. You sound like someone who has absolutely no idea how dems think confidently trying to explain how dems think. It’s absurd
Timeline is an incredible documentary maker, this piece is fantastic
Great commentary and presentation!
One can understand why Britain was so slow at rearmament between the warsand our reluctance to get dragged into another one
The presentation is world class and the explanation and opinion superb I find this chap fascinating and enlightening thank you
Political figures often get bogged down in domestic problems and take their eye off foreign affairs. Stanley Baldwin was vilified once WWII started. It wasn't just poor equipment but also outdated tactics which cost Britain so badly between 1939-42. If you read Max Hastings WWII book he credits the British RAF and the Royal Navy as both performing excellently during WWII but he thinks the British army underperformed. Everytime it came up agaisnt German forces it was defeated and the losses to Japan in the far east shattered the confidence in the Empire, Signapore was captured by 36,000 Japanese troops agaisnt 80,000 allied troops defending it. He's also not a big fan of Monty and doesn't think he was much better than all the other generals Churchill sacked, he just had better armed troops and by 1942 the UK had two major new allies but Monty he describes as obsessed with his own self-image and his rivalry with Patton.
@@lw3646 I Believe that by the Time WW2 and the Fall of France and the Low Countries we were starting to see the rise of the Cult of Personality in the various Generals Field Marshals and Warlords ..Just as in today's society When the Media play up your Ego for Propaganda purposes and National interest ...Ancient Rome was little different in these respects i suspect But most definitely our Infantry Weapons and Tactics were Badly behind and the Army had a lot of catching up to do if it ever did with the Quality when compared to what the Nazis produced
Many would like to see a handful of countries and leaders as being the cause of the 2 wars and they were the victims.
The main cause of the Great War(s) was a power struggle that went back several centuries by a handful of Western European countries for world domination. Starting from Spain & Portugal in the New World and ended with Britain, France, Holland, Belgium, Germany and later Japan into the 20th century controlling more than half of the world's territories. The First War ended with the allies (including Britain, France, Belgium, Italy & Japan) as winners gaining more territories while the power struggle led into the Second War. The colonial race was partly to blame for the second conflict than simply the madmen in Berlin or Rome.
Thank you Professor Reynolds for this oustanding work,and moving documentary.
Thank you for your documentaries, Professor Reynolds!
May I also highlight the detrimental psychological and physical affects the Great War had on numerous soldiers who survived the battles. Their families supported them for many years after the war.
A couple of my Great Uncles effectively drank themselves to death as a result of their service in WW1.
20:10 - 20:45 Wow, that quote, perfectly mimicing Hitler's inflection was chilling. In hindsight, people point to him as a raving lunatic, but in the beginning. He had to convince, everyone, that they had been wronged.
No, the knife in the back theory was all over the place. He was along for the ride with everyone else....
@@yousircantknow8987 What knife in the back theory? If he was "Along for the ride," he was up front.
He felt the same, betrayed, and recognized he could use that emotion to create a power movement, and Rode that mentality, expanding it with speech and imagery, leading that expanding group it to the End. His personal rage against the world became suicidal, as his favorite Wagner dramas all ended in death- in this case the death of national German superiority-over-all (everyone) ideology & culture.
@@RalphPhilbrook It really turns into an epic tragedy the more you look at it. In his unyielding desire to turn Germany into the world superpower with the "Aryan" people at the top he ultimately destroyed the entire concept along with 10's of millions of lives and a finally completely destroyed nation.
Price less simply Price less
A totally a unique aspect of world wars and beyond , thanks for sharing
I downloaded this Thank you
In Verdun, where the battle lasted 300 days and nights, and killed a total of at least 2-3 million people, to conquer, at the end, a territory of less than 3km2, called the no-man's land. It took until mid-1960s, before a (governmental) cemetery for fallen German soldiers was allowed to be set up. This is Europe. One can go back in history to various empires and migration movements, to the Treaty of Westfalen, setting up the idea of national states (instead of classes like the Roman Empire), up to the Napoleonic wars, this war, the second world war, and of course, the Balkan wars of 1990s. I am a European, and we have no excuse for this slaughter of people and inhumanity (such as the Holocaust), especially because we are generally well educated and have access to information of various sources to allow us an independent and analytical thinking.
Poodles rock roughly 300,000 soldiers died in the battle of Verdun with another 400,000 wounded. It finished exactly where it started. No land or territory was gained or lost by either side. No man’s land was simply the area in between the two armies that no one occupied during the battle. As you can imagine troops had to have a certain amount of distance between them. My great grandfather fought in the Great War and I used to listen to him whenever he told stories about the horror of war never the honour. This was because he didn’t want me to ever go through what he did. Interestingly at least one male family member from each generation of my family has served his country going back to a time prior to 1066. My grandfather was in WWII my uncle in Korea my father Vietnam me in the Gulf wars my son in Afghanistan. I pray my grandson just goes to college and skip the whole killing people thing. I think my family has done its fair share.
@@prepperjonpnw6482 You may like this speech: czcams.com/video/xN4U24vtnDY/video.html
Do you like this documentary? czcams.com/video/BoKrKg7ZCQ0/video.html&index=26
Yes, I am a fan of Chris Hedges. His book of same title as this speech, describes so well the sacrifice that American soldiers and civil have endured since its Civil War. The stories, the shame, the image of a glorious war (to keep calm & carry on) from a generation to another. Do you have any references/sources to the first fake D-day landing where mainly Irish and Canadian soldiers were sent to slaughter in order to cover and prepare for the real thing?
In the early 1990s, I recall being in Munich, to make a flight to the former Yugoslavia and its genocidal war. Studying genocidal crimes and settling their requirements in justice, was my profession then and I simply could not believe that a simple hour flight or so from the prosperous, newly reunified Germany, there it was again, a European war of jubilant nationalism, mouldering mass graves and all that meant and will mean.
Now there is war in the Ukraine, east and west, and several simmering possible civil wars in Europe and Europe again is racing to commit suicide by war, allowing democracy to be undermined in the name of profit as well as blowing up the postwar order guaranteed by NATO and the EU. God help us all. Not even a century’s peace in Europe after 1945.
Im Australian. My Granfather was in Gallipolli. Australia sent troops to the Sudan, Boer War, Navy to Boxer Rebelliin, WWI, WWII, Korea, Malaya, Vietnam, any UN parade, Iraq, the Afgahn fiasco, Timor.
Upon reflection, I believe the only war we should have gone into would be WWII and then only un New Guinea and Timor in 1975, not the 1990s.
Point well made and taken. The war had to effect the century. We failed to learn the lessons taught in The Great War, and thus, we had WW2. Though, it's foolish to not admit that winners and losers see the war in the same way. Thanks for posting.
i have this on dvd great documentary
After 45 minutes of conditioning, you might think the sprinkler that appears less than a minute later was actually machine guns.
Metaphors: the secret keys to art.
Good historian, good point of view,
There has been a great curiosity growing about The Great War for a decade or so here in America . It got glossed over in my High School days
Bravo Sir!! Another Outstanding addition to the ongoing series chronicling the seismic events of 1914 up to and through 1945!! Thank You...
just the rich mans way of culling the working class
That isn't what they really want though. The capitalists want plenty of workers available (excess of supply over demand) to keep down wages and working conditions.
@@kiwitrainguy Who do you think went to fight these wars? The workers did. Half went to fight, the other half to manufacture arms to keep the war going. The entire war lived and died on the backs of the working class.
@@kabukikommandofourthworld5266 I agree, I should've added that as well. Keep down wages and working conditions AND fight in their wars.
(4:10) The reality of warfare remained distant and obscure. So the British entombed the unknown horrors in grand monuments - memory was cloaked in remembrance. The architect's tomb was in effect an empty space onto which people could project their own memories and emotions.
THE best historical narrator!
Such a sacrifice that generation of young men made. Not only has todays youth completely ignored that sacrifice but cancel culture is even attacking the immortal words of Kipling.
"After 1936 people could discern the face of war".
Welcome 2020.
The fact that Wilfred Owen's brother tried to simplify his legacy does not validate Reynolds' assessment. Nor does Owen's decision to return to the front. 'The Parable of the Old man and the Young' was written in the last months of the war. Owen may have been ambivalent about his own duty, religion, loyalty to his men and his country but he had no doubts about the evils of war and those responsible for it.
"....When lo! an angel called him out of heaven,
Saying, Lay not thy hand upon the lad,
Neither do anything to him. Behold,
A ram, caught in a thicket by its horns;
Offer the Ram of Pride instead of him.
But the old man would not so, but slew his son,
And half the seed of Europe, one by one."
Great documentary
Documentarys from Timeline are the great
"the most notorious veteran on the German side..."
The Red Baron?
Lol
@@kwafoyawson7839 ..... exactly, lol.
I would argue that at the moment no where else can the effects of the first world war be felt more than in the middle east. Yes it started in Europe more than a century ago but its repercussions are world wide until today
@Genesis1 Britain and France did not have interest in oil in the middle east, the USA was the largest producer in the world and oil was not that big of a deal just yet. They just wanted to divide the local populations to their liking, easier to deal with, plus they wanted easy access to their east Asian colonial outposts. Substantial oil production did not come from the middle east until the empires were in collapse.
@@jrus690 Britain was granted/took Iraq and Persia after the First World War precisely because of the oil deposits there.
good documentary
Thanks
The most important question that should be asked is why was there a war in the first place.
A family tiff ?
It’s certainly much more complicated than a simple family rivalry. Global trade, finance, modern industry, imperialism, old human habits, us vs. them, care to add some more?
I believe there’s something in the human dna that allows and periodically causes these things. The Great War was a major turning point in our history. We really have to understand what it means if we are to move forward as a species.
@@kensurrency2564 tribalism,pride,so many reasons
@@kensurrency2564, you just about covered it all. Greed, money and power."
The same reason why all wars were/are fought for.
The rich and powerful sacrificing the "peasants" for profit.
I forgot to add that Kaiser Wilhelm II had a serious inferiority complex. One disfigured arm and a life time of hardship dealing with that, and at the same time being the heir to the throne. He had to overcompensate a bit. His diplomacy was known to absolutely suck. People still put up with him, for a while.
@@kensurrency2564 It brought down the old world of kingdom and country (tyranny) and helped usher in the new world of Liberal Democracy. This was in motion before the war, but the war greatly accelerated the pace by destroying 4 imperial powers and helping undermine the other 2. Communism was an unfortunate offshoot as millions of people fell prey to the idea of absolute equality without really realizing what that would actually mean. Most of the wars of the 20th century were the fallout of WW1, but as the leftover colonial bush fires ended the countries that have come out of the mess are more or less democracy's. Kaiser Wilhelm II was no different than any other monarch that has ever lived. Britain and France had the two biggest ego's in the world in 1914 and considered it a crime against humanity when Wilhelm II tried to challenge them.
The Great War is not really remembered in Germany . WW2 casts a too big shadow.
Also his conclusion to let go of the dead I find quedtionable. Is it not rememberence of them that suppose to restrain us?
Verdun is remembered very much in Germany.
I think that Reynolds' main point in this piece is that we ought not be restrained. He seems to advocate military exceptionalism and power politics, and seems to hold remembrance in clear and obvious disdain. I find his views in this documentary to be rather horrifying and disrespectful, honestly.
I think the point he's trying to make is that we need to raise our eyes from the horrors of the trenches and look at the war in a larger context. In other words, not just to remember but to understand.
WW1 was considered to be the war to end all wars, and it was more or less the opposite. It was the war the century of wars began with. One of the reasons was that people only remembered without understanding.
Restrain? What restraint? there has been *endless* war, primarily initiated by the Allies, since the end of WW1. The only difference is instead of bombing our own cities we do it somewhere else...
It's a really good doc. The only thing that's leaves me wanting more is he doesn't let you know his own view on it. Its more about, this is how people looked on it in the 1920s, here's an important play from the 1930s, here's how WWII lead to a changing view of WWI, here's the contrast between British and German attitudes in the 1920s. Its not till the final 5 minutes he starts to give his own view by rejecting the anti-war poetry and plays as the main lense we should view history through.
i think the main point was that we should not remember the great war as a romantic struggle or as something that had no meaning or impact.
We need to learn and understand it as history. not as a drama.
You can see what inspired the ending of Blackadder Goes Forth
We never should have involved ourselves in either one of those European wars.
USA was the 16th Economy in the world at the start of WWII, I dunno, it worked out.
Yousir Cantknow Er, no, it was the largest economy in the world already. Perhaps you mean that it had the world’s 16th-largest army? That’s more plausible.
Why & when professor Reynolds decided to lend his knowledgeable forte to the timeline documentary series is wonderful
Excellent doco world leaders need to take heed and watch this ! From what I understand it is still good vs evil "Lest We Forget "
What a great documentary but I was a bit upset in the last few seconds when he said, "it's about time we let go of the dead".
We should never stop remembering them. Never.
Yes the two world wars were horrible war but that's the nature of war. And I agree that war should be learnt from then placed firmly into the pages of history but to just forget those that fought and died??? We shall remember them.
But not just British serviceman, we should remember every serviceman from every nation.
I can agree with what you're saying - it certainly can be said, however, to let go of some of the ideas around the dead.
I don’t think that’s exactly what he meant, we should never forget however we as a country have not moved on from these wars culturally or politically and it is time we stopped defining ourselves by the armed conflicts of our past.
@@nousername123451 I agree. I think one reason amongst many (and I maybe wrong here) why we as a country have not moved on from the second world war especially is because of the 'blitz spirit', the idea that as a small nation we stand together more when our backs are against the wall.
In today's climate, what with terrorism etc we draw on that when something happens. So many times I've heard people say that no one will make us crumble, we won't give in no matter what terrorists throw at us. Because we've got the blitz spirit.
I think that David Reynolds may have meant that for the British “‘it is time that we let go of (the memory) of the dead of WW1”. Those of us who lost family in WW1 cannot forget that fact. However, perhaps it is time to stop the remembrance services and public holidays for a war that ended 100 years ago. The Germans have forgotten WW1 and certainly have no remembrance services. We have long forgotten British soldiers who died in 19th century wars. Perhaps we should limit remembrance services to WW2 and cease those services after 2045, which is 100 years after the end of WW2. We have to let the memory go at some point,
To be fair, He did restrain from the " Lions led by donkeys " And by the sheer length of time that no soldier is around anymore that it has now slipped into the first stage of historical context
Abyssinia=Ethiopia!
David Reynolds is a great narrator.
He really is, a great storyteller.
I love David Reynolds narrative. He keeps me on the edge of my seat. I can't get enough of his videos. I couldn't help but note that in the close up of the poppies, that they are genuine opium poppies.
These films should be shown to our High School Students as part of a required World History Class. I know I know, some High Schools no longer allow these Classes to be taught.
So they can't reconize the danger of propaganda anymore...........
Some high schools don't allow history classes? Ok, it's nice you want to sound intelligent, but that's asinine. Timeline does pretty middle-of-the-road popular history subjects. Don't turn this into a way to fight some boogeyman establishment out there.. teaching.
@Doug Helsley 'propaganda' is simply the word which is used to describe the means by which ideas are propagated. It is misused by those who wish to pretend they are not propagandists.
luckily that old thesis by Fischer has been completly debunked and more forward thinkers, who recognize the complexety of the situation back then now dominate the academic discourse (as well as hughe parts of the public discourse). Especially "The Sleepwalkers" by C. Clarke is now one of the central books when it comes to the question of war guilt and more modern research has brought forth things like CZcams channels dedicated to WW1 (such as TheGreatWar). So I stand hopeful that people will see this war in yet again another light and learn of the tragedies that happened back then.
A mainstream documentary whose topic historiography. BRILLIANT
I expected a quote from Kipling's Epitaphs, "If any question why we died/ Tell them, because our fathers lied"
Comparing the poignancy in those lines to Kipling's poetry at the beginning of the Great War offers a clear picture of the spiritual wasteland the conflict brought into the 20th Century.