To see subtitles in other languages: Click on the gear symbol under the video, then click on "subtitles." Then select the language (You may need to scroll up and down to see all the languages available). --To change subtitle appearance: Scroll to the top of the language selection window and click "options." In the options window you can, for example, choose a different font color and background color, and set the "background opacity" to 100% to help make the subtitles more readable. --To turn the subtitles "on" or "off" altogether: Click the "CC" button under the video. --If you believe that the translation in the subtitles can be improved, please send me an email.
Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. (More spatial curvature). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are actually a part of the quarks. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Force" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" make sense based on this concept. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons. Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons. Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves.
@@EugeneKhutoryansky Speaking of the Higgs field, I wonder how the top quark gets massive enough, I mean, it's a paradoxical loop ( it's a bit short-lived, so it might not have had enough time to get mass, which means it couldn't decay, but it does, etc.).
I am amazed by amounts of knowledge a typical particle physicist must possess. Surely, these animations took an incredible amount of work to be done. Thank you Eugene and Kira for such a rigorous explanation.
Revised TOE: 3/25/2017a. My Current TOE: THE SETUP: 1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism. 2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.). 3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them. 4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them. 5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them. FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO: 6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field. 7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field. 8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality. 9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons. 10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary. 11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks. 12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do. THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA: 13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc. 14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe. 15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe. 16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate. 17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure. 18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons). THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY: 19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up. 20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency. 21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies. NOTES: 22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other. 23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other. 24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well. 25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true. 26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught? DISCLAIMER: 27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty. _______________________________________________________________________________ Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way. a. Imagine a 12 hour clock. b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions. c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions. (The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.) d. Shoot a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields. e. Do this with the em fields on and off. (The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results.) f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects. (Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.) (An alternative to the above would be to shoot 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.) 'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done. 'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. Science still wins either way and moves forward.
You can help translate this video by adding subtitles in other languages. To add a translation, click on the following link: czcams.com/users/timedtext_video?ref=share&v=iIWTRwJlrGo You will then be able to add translations for all the subtitles. You will also be able to provide a translation for the title of the video. Please remember to hit the submit button for both the title and for the subtitles, as they are submitted separately. Details about adding translations is available at support.google.com/youtube/answer/6054623?hl=en Thanks.
What's the difference between pion (quark+ anti-quark) that proton and neutron exchange and W-bozone (the same charge, the same parity, the same decay products- electron+ electron anti-neutrino) ? Thank you PS please, like me to see the answer
The way of explanation in his videos make it much easier for beginners to understand! Trying to find a simpler way to teach my son these things, this is perfect! Amazing visuals and editing. Talented person!
Wow! W+, W-, and Z bosons were always (since I learned about them) such a mystery to me! This video helped me understand them more than any other video (or other media) I've seen on them. I'm still interested in learning more about "rest mass", but wow...this was amazingly informative!
@Cliff Jumper Thanks a lot for that long explanation! It did clear things up! I guess I thought that while weight depended on gravity, mass didn't change. But like with length and time, it seems that mass also changes depending on the observer and the changes become more apparent as the speed of light is (nearly) reached. I appreciate you taking the time to inform me!
1:24 I honestly thought you were gonna bring up supersymmetric particles for some reason. Also, DOUBLE THE POINTS AGAIN! Sorry, but I feel like that should be a meme on this channel 😅 .
You're welcome. The only problem that I have is believing that "zero" exists in the universe. It seems to me that even if a particle has zero mass, it should at least have a charge, "-0 or +0". But I don't know the mathematics. Maybe someone can explain how zero can exist in the quantum universe.
Greatly appreciate your efforts, your physics understanding, and your musical taste; hope you'll play Rimsky-Korsakov (Scheherazade maybe) in your next video :-)
The animation from 3:13 is one of the most jaw-dropping visuals of a wave direction in a quantum position Would be awesome if there was an open-source page to test around with it.. maybe help other wanderers create works of the imagination - perhaps one for chivalry as well as chirality HA!
I have a number of videos where I use that type of animation of Quantum Wave functions to describe a variety of phenomena. Examples are listed below. Quantum Wave Function Visualization czcams.com/video/KKr91v7yLcM/video.html Quantum Tunneling czcams.com/video/RF7dDt3tVmI/video.html Quantum Operators czcams.com/video/LZie2QC5Jbc/video.html Schrodinger's Equation czcams.com/video/jvvkomcmyuo/video.html
Another wonderful illustration as always. Bravo! Would you also please consider making a video regarding Noether's Theorem, Conservation law, and concept Symmetry? If so, that would be great.
Great video, as always. Hope you can help me out with a couple of questions: What do the shapes that you use to depict quarks in these videos represent? Also, I've encountered terms such as 'weak hypercharge' and 'weak Isospin' before but I've never understood what these properties are or how they relate to the weak force. Do you have any explanation that could help me with that?
Excellent job as usual, Eugene. I'm curious, is there an operator that returns the chirality of a given wave function or state vector, and if so, what is it?
Im really interested how is it possible in an expanding universe to have galaxy collisions and even the collision of our own galaxy with Andromeda. Also when they have measured that the light comming from Andromeda is blue shifted does that mean its heading directly towards us or we are spiraling in an ever smaller radius. Thanks in advance if you do a video or if you answer on that!
I love your videos! It always helps me get a more intuitive understanding of these concepts. I have a question: At 14:18 what do you mean by the time duration being smaller? Does the W boson exist for a shorter time? Also if it is possible for these virtual particles to interact then why do we consider them virtual?
I have one thing to add: there is a close representation (not perfect, but close) in a branch of classical physics for chirality, and that’s the direction of the spiral in a screw’s thread It has a rotational element even at rest, and uses a similar ‘left/right-handedness’ for its ‘direction’, and even though they both exist, you’re most likely to find the one kind, since the other just flat out doesn’t work with the same hardware Granted that’s from mechanical engineering, not physics or mathematics, but engineering is one of the practical applications of maths and sciences, soooo 🤷♂️
Very interesting. I have heard some physicists do not like the standard model as they believe it is too complicated and incomplete. I cannot make an opinion as I am not a particle physicist, but I do try and understand what I see and read. I do look forward to seeing the evolution of particle physics over my lifetime.
Single diagram relating all particles with actual values of mass/charge/spin etc - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model#/media/File:Standard_Model_of_Elementary_Particles.svg
To see subtitles in other languages: Click on the gear symbol under the video, then click on "subtitles." Then select the language (You may need to scroll up and down to see all the languages available).
--To change subtitle appearance: Scroll to the top of the language selection window and click "options." In the options window you can, for example, choose a different font color and background color, and set the "background opacity" to 100% to help make the subtitles more readable.
--To turn the subtitles "on" or "off" altogether: Click the "CC" button under the video.
--If you believe that the translation in the subtitles can be improved, please send me an email.
votre présentation est magnifique, Eugène, merci.
I tried, it was still way above my head :)
Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules:
When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. (More spatial curvature). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are actually a part of the quarks. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Force" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" make sense based on this concept. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons.
Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons.
Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron.
Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves.
What is anti matter particles made of ?
Here's the short version:
The W-Boson is the magician amongst the elementary particles
a W-izard
I miss the days when an atom was made up of just 3 elementary particles.
Quarks are still fascinating though!
Mot like we can go back
What about colour charge
but an atom is still made up of just 3 elementary particles: up quarks, down quarks and electrons
I still stick to that idea and can explain a lot more than the Standard Modell with that assumption.
I love how you got the W and Z animations to emerge from inside the shapes. Very nice!
Thanks. I am glad you liked my animations.
@@EugeneKhutoryansky Did you make all of these yourself?
Alexander, yes I make all the animations for my videos myself.
@@EugeneKhutoryansky So you do everything?
My friend Kira does the narration.
These Physics Videos are my final resort when other videos overwhelm me with complicated explanations
@@Brad-qw1te Trust me your not lol this isn't an easy topic. But this is the best explanation on it.
Can you do a video on The Higgs mechanism this format is perfect for it.
The Higgs field is on my list of topics for future videos. Thanks.
Yes yes yes yes yes please
Cool
That's what I was going to say!
@@EugeneKhutoryansky Speaking of the Higgs field, I wonder how the top quark gets massive enough, I mean, it's a paradoxical loop ( it's a bit short-lived, so it might not have had enough time to get mass, which means it couldn't decay, but it does, etc.).
I am amazed by amounts of knowledge a typical particle physicist must possess. Surely, these animations took an incredible amount of work to be done. Thank you Eugene and Kira for such a rigorous explanation.
Thanks.
If you like this video, you can help more people find it in their CZcams search engine by clicking the like button, and writing a comment. Thanks.
Very Good Video Sir.
Sir, please made a video on atomic structure consisting of full information about atomic orbital.
Already subbed
Revised TOE: 3/25/2017a.
My Current TOE:
THE SETUP:
1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism.
2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.).
3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them.
5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them.
FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO:
6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field.
7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field.
8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality.
9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons.
10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary.
11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks.
12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do.
THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA:
13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc.
14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe.
15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe.
16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate.
17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure.
18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons).
THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY:
19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up.
20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency.
21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies.
NOTES:
22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well.
25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true.
26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught?
DISCLAIMER:
27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.
_______________________________________________________________________________
Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way.
a. Imagine a 12 hour clock.
b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions.
c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions.
(The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.)
d. Shoot a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields.
e. Do this with the em fields on and off.
(The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results.)
f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects.
(Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.)
(An alternative to the above would be to shoot 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.)
'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done.
'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. Science still wins either way and moves forward.
@@charlesbrightman4237 This wall of text needs to be its own video. A bit TL;DR there.
Thank you so much! I guess this is one of the best popular explaination of the weak nuclear force in the internet.
Thanks for the compliment.
These videos have the right amount of simplicity so that I can actually feel like I learned something. Love them!
It is an underrated channel. You guys certainly deserve more subscribers. Amazing animation and presentation
Thanks for the compliment.
Great job ! This channel deserves far more subscribers :-)
Thanks!!!
You can help translate this video by adding subtitles in other languages. To add a translation, click on the following link:
czcams.com/users/timedtext_video?ref=share&v=iIWTRwJlrGo
You will then be able to add translations for all the subtitles. You will also be able to provide a translation for the title of the video. Please remember to hit the submit button for both the title and for the subtitles, as they are submitted separately.
Details about adding translations is available at
support.google.com/youtube/answer/6054623?hl=en
Thanks.
What's the difference between pion (quark+ anti-quark) that proton and neutron exchange and W-bozone (the same charge, the same parity, the same decay products- electron+ electron anti-neutrino) ?
Thank you
PS please, like me to see the answer
Best physics videos on CZcams?
Eugene is back with another cool video!
Wow, the weak force is bizarre. Almost whimsical-feeling! Great explanations and animations
The way of explanation in his videos make it much easier for beginners to understand! Trying to find a simpler way to teach my son these things, this is perfect! Amazing visuals and editing. Talented person!
Thanks.
at 2:15 eugene actually sticks his hands into his physics sim world and gives us the thumbs up.
Really you are back with another awesome video
I am so glad for the animations, they really help me to wrap my head around the concepts!
Thanks. I am glad that my animations are helpful.
Keep these videos coming please. I appreciate the work and it helps me out understanding particle physics.
More videos are on their way. Thanks.
Love your videos as always!!! Thank you.
Thanks.
Wow! W+, W-, and Z bosons were always (since I learned about them) such a mystery to me! This video helped me understand them more than any other video (or other media) I've seen on them. I'm still interested in learning more about "rest mass", but wow...this was amazingly informative!
I am glad my video was helpful. Thanks.
@Cliff Jumper Thanks a lot for that long explanation! It did clear things up! I guess I thought that while weight depended on gravity, mass didn't change. But like with length and time, it seems that mass also changes depending on the observer and the changes become more apparent as the speed of light is (nearly) reached. I appreciate you taking the time to inform me!
Great to see a new video!
Many more new videos are on their way. Thanks.
Awesome! I'm looking forward to that.
🤯 Wow. Good explanation.
I love visualization of concepts. It helps me staying away from misconceptions. And helps my understanding by a ton
Thanks.
Thanks a lot for the video!
I learnt so much with this channel, thanks again for such great work!
Thanks.
Subscribed!
Wow what a beautiful voice!!!
This video is awesome
Glad you liked it. Thanks for the compliment.
Excellent. By far, the best explanation of the standard model that I have encountered.
Thanks for the compliment about my explanation.
Deliciously delightful. Thank you for such great content.
Thanks. I am glad you liked my video.
great expalanation sir.......
Thanks. I am glad you liked my explanation.
i love the smell of neutrinos in the morning
Great animation and amazing content explained in very simple way. You do a great job! Keep it up!👍👍❤️
Love from INDIA.🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
Thanks for the compliment.
You blow my mind every time
Finally an in-depth look! Thank you
Thanks.
these are some funky fonts lmao, great video!
1:24 I honestly thought you were gonna bring up supersymmetric particles for some reason. Also, DOUBLE THE POINTS AGAIN! Sorry, but I feel like that should be a meme on this channel 😅 .
Guess who's back!!! Excellent Sir Eugene
Amazing as always!!
Thanks.
Fascinating and mind-blowing ♥
Thanks. Glad you liked it.
You always blow my mind out of my head....its really good and knowledgefull documentation. ..
Thanks
Thanks.
Thank you, Eugene.
You are welcome and thanks.
Loved the vid, specially the music lol
Eugene you have done a great job.
Thanks.
Really nice visuals, thanks!
Thanks.
You're welcome. The only problem that I have is believing that "zero" exists in the universe. It seems to me that even if a particle has zero mass, it should at least have a charge, "-0 or +0". But I don't know the mathematics. Maybe someone can explain how zero can exist in the quantum universe.
What I most value of these videos is the lack of scientific speculation, which I see in PBS
Fantastic series
Thanks. Glad you like it.
Very cool video. Thank you.
Glad you liked my video. Thanks.
Weak Nuclear Force and Standard Model of Particle Physics
All in15 minutes
Best ever and best wishes for Eugene...
Thanks.
Very good as always!
Thanks for the compliment.
Greatly appreciate your efforts, your physics understanding, and your musical taste; hope you'll play Rimsky-Korsakov (Scheherazade maybe) in your next video :-)
Great video ! Thank you !
Thanks.
The animation from 3:13 is one of the most jaw-dropping visuals of a wave direction in a quantum position
Would be awesome if there was an open-source page to test around with it.. maybe help other wanderers
create works of the imagination - perhaps one for chivalry as well as chirality HA!
I have a number of videos where I use that type of animation of Quantum Wave functions to describe a variety of phenomena. Examples are listed below.
Quantum Wave Function Visualization czcams.com/video/KKr91v7yLcM/video.html
Quantum Tunneling czcams.com/video/RF7dDt3tVmI/video.html
Quantum Operators czcams.com/video/LZie2QC5Jbc/video.html
Schrodinger's Equation czcams.com/video/jvvkomcmyuo/video.html
Another wonderful illustration as always. Bravo!
Would you also please consider making a video regarding Noether's Theorem, Conservation law, and concept Symmetry? If so, that would be great.
That is on my list of topics for future videos. Thanks.
Thanks for the video
THIS IS TOTALLY AWESOME!
Was so much interesting, and complex. To see only once
Thanks for the video!
Thanks.
Your videos are excellent and the theory behind is top....👍👍👍
Thanks for the compliment.
you know you'll get mindblown when you see a Eugene video in the feed
A great video sir!
Thanks for the compliment.
Yes best physics Channel absolutely I love it
Thanks for the compliment.
thank u so much amazing video so much information
Glad you liked my video. Thanks.
We are going over this in physics class right now so I'm definitely going to show this video to my teacher.
I hope your teacher likes it.
Great video, as always. Hope you can help me out with a couple of questions:
What do the shapes that you use to depict quarks in these videos represent? Also, I've encountered terms such as 'weak hypercharge' and 'weak Isospin' before but I've never understood what these properties are or how they relate to the weak force. Do you have any explanation that could help me with that?
Great video, really helps to get a picture behind all the Maths.
Thanks.
Great job
Thanks.
great video!
Thanks.
im so happy i stumbled on this
Excellent job as usual, Eugene.
I'm curious, is there an operator that returns the chirality of a given wave function or state vector, and if so, what is it?
Never stop making these videos
More videos are on their way.
Keep up the good work !
Thanks. More videos are on their way.
Im really interested how is it possible in an expanding universe to have galaxy collisions and even the collision of our own galaxy with Andromeda. Also when they have measured that the light comming from Andromeda is blue shifted does that mean its heading directly towards us or we are spiraling in an ever smaller radius. Thanks in advance if you do a video or if you answer on that!
Awesome sir, continue your work of spreading the thirst for knowledge on Physics through your videos. Yipheeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thanks for the compliment. More videos are on their way.
Awaiting eagerly for the videos sir!
Great video
Thanks. Glad you liked it.
Thank you Eugene as alway
Thanks.
Great thank you very much
This video is awesome.
Thanks. Glad you liked it.
I love your videos! It always helps me get a more intuitive understanding of these concepts.
I have a question: At 14:18 what do you mean by the time duration being smaller? Does the W boson exist for a shorter time? Also if it is possible for these virtual particles to interact then why do we consider them virtual?
You and Isaac Arthur have the best youtube channels.
Thanks for the compliment.
Excellent... thanks 🙏
Glad you liked my video. Thanks.
Super! Thanks
This video explained the weak force better to me than any other video has done before. I still dont get it but I saw a pattern of where this is going.
Epic channel!
Thanks for the compliment.
God Bless you Eugene Khutoryansky :)
Thanks.
I have one thing to add: there is a close representation (not perfect, but close) in a branch of classical physics for chirality, and that’s the direction of the spiral in a screw’s thread
It has a rotational element even at rest, and uses a similar ‘left/right-handedness’ for its ‘direction’, and even though they both exist, you’re most likely to find the one kind, since the other just flat out doesn’t work with the same hardware
Granted that’s from mechanical engineering, not physics or mathematics, but engineering is one of the practical applications of maths and sciences, soooo 🤷♂️
I like the animations.
Nice explanation.
Thanks.
wonderful
The BGM at the beginning was felt like I'm saving the universe.
3:43 "phenomena" is plural. The singular is "phenomenon".
Exactly; it is from the Greek language [φαινόμενον (singular), φαινόμενα (plural)].
congratulation :)
I am waiting for this 😊😊😊👍👍👍👍👍
The wait is over :)
@@EugeneKhutoryansky 😍😍😍🤗
Thanks!
Very interesting. I have heard some physicists do not like the standard model as they believe it is too complicated and incomplete. I cannot make an opinion as I am not a particle physicist, but I do try and understand what I see and read.
I do look forward to seeing the evolution of particle physics over my lifetime.
Omg yes I’ve missed these
I didn't understand a single word but i felt like am in paradise. ...lol
Single diagram relating all particles with actual values of mass/charge/spin etc - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model#/media/File:Standard_Model_of_Elementary_Particles.svg
Excellent
Thanks for the compliment.
The field in which i wish to do MS is this... Gauge Theories and QFT. 😃 Great visualization.
Glad you liked my visualization. Thanks.