How to Create a Differential Diagnosis (Part 2 of 3)
Vložit
- čas přidán 7. 07. 2024
- Part 2 of a 3 part video series on clinical reasoning, focusing on how to create a differential diagnoiss from a patient's presentation. Topics covered include determination of key features, problem representation, semantic qualifiers, and diagnostic frameworks,
As a Brazilian medical student, I sincerely thank you, Dr. Eric, for the outstanding medical videos you are making available! For sure, you are helping me and many other future physicians to provide a higher standard of healthcare to our patients.
Sorry, got a cold before I could record part 3. Hopefully will be up by Monday.
This was posted 10 years and i'm extremely lucky to find it today. Thank you very much doctor
this is most interesting cases I ever watched.
thumb up Dr. Sstrong. I REALLY APPRECIATE.
I can't thank you enough. Your videos have greatly augmented my knowledge base (no pun intended).
This is just awesome! Keep it coming.
Though I am expert in my field (pediatric) I learn from it ,it will make you thinking very differently thanks again
excellent way of teaching...really learn lots of thing...Thanks
Wow... it is awesome and methodical... thank you Sir... We expect more from you..
thank you very much doctor.. it is an amazing job you're doing here.. you have really helped me a lot with your videos.. thanks again
awesome videos!!respect!
Thank you for the helpful video. 🙏
Fantastic teaching of DDx.Thank you
Very good thanks! By definition the patient definitely meets a diagnosis of pancreatitis (2/3 of clinical signs, biochemical, or imaging) but it's very prudent to not overlook other potential diagnosis. Specially the "dont miss" and other common presentations.
Excellent! Thank you for the video!
great presentation! :)
Thank you for this. Really clear and helpful.
Thank you so much for this video, it will help with my OSCE
wonderful work
you helped me
and who does not thank people does not thank Allah so thank you very much
go on
may Allah bless you
Thank you very much Dr. I learned so much from this!
This was great! Thanks.
thanks for the excellent explaination
This is superb
Great presentation. Funny how things change 9 years later. A negative 4hr hs-TnT would close to rule out ACS in this setting. Also, FOBT now known to be essentially unhelpful here. Love your channel by the way.
i fall in love d way u teach
Outstanding presentation
Thank you so much ,this is great effort
Incredible tutorial
amazing ... learned a lot .
Amazingly helpful
lots of respect for u sir
Awesome. Thanks a lot for making learning videos at free of cost
The most important line is " there are no specificity or senstivity testing for pain decrease by position", objective is always more important than subjective, another example, degree of chest pain from 1 to 10 in determining angina or MI is not important, trying to boil down data to information then to knowledge is the way to wisdom
wow
this was awesome, thank you. but where is part 3???