Why I Fear the Future - Konstantin Kisin
Vložit
- čas přidán 4. 09. 2024
- Until I found myself sitting in the audience of Lempicka, I never really understood why Jordan Peterson spent so much time focusing on the duality of order and chaos. I do now.
Have you considered buying gold to protect yourself in these uncertain times? My bullion dealer is The Pure Gold Company. Low premiums, terrific service. They deliver to the UK, US, Canada and Europe, or you can store your gold with them for ease and convenience. - www.thepuregol...
Konstantin's Substack - substack.com/h...
Konstantin's Twitter - x.com/Konstant...
💥Join us on our Journey to 1 Million Subscribers💥
Join our exclusive TRIGGERnometry community on Locals! triggernometry...
OR Support TRIGGERnometry Here:
Bitcoin: bc1qm6vvhduc6s3rvy8u76sllmrfpynfv94qw8p8d5
Buy Merch Here:
www.triggerpod...
Advertise on TRIGGERnometry:
marketing@triggerpod.co.uk
Join the Mailing List:
www.triggerpod...
Find TRIGGERnometry on Social Media:
/ triggerpod
/ triggerpod
/ triggerpod
About TRIGGERnometry:
Stand-up comedians Konstantin Kisin (@konstantinkisin) and Francis Foster (@francisjfoster) make sense of politics, economics, free speech, AI, drug policy and WW3 with the help of presidential advisors, renowned economists, award-winning journalists, controversial writers, leading scientists and notorious comedians.
Have you considered buying gold to protect yourself in these uncertain times? www.thepuregoldcompany.co.uk/konstantin-kisin
No, but I have considered a bottle of scotch and a bottle of sleeping pills.
Evolve our use of words and understanding in alignment with what nature aligns with .
My son is 40 yrs old English white masculine and straight
Gold isn't solving that ..in England..
Only when they produce the 'Edible' kind!
Gold is unlikely to help you. It can only help out during a limited hyperinflationary period. With nearly any other form of economic collapse, war, or crash, it won't do much for you.
A recent experiment offered people on the street a choice between a $100 bill and a 1 oz gold coin - EVERYONE took the $100 bill. People are no longer familiar enough with gold to trust it.
Go with silver instead.
It is what Freddie Mercury eventually realised. "I do not want to party 24/7. I just want to sing". He made 4 more albums with Queen after his frantic period (and one post-mortem) while being hiv positive, just because he turned away from that lifestyle. This is what Łępicka never could, and her later work suffered greatly. Hedonism is not freedom, it is a prison.
It is, indeed, the price of a conviction.
Fauci was involved in his death. The drugs he was given, killed him. Magic Johnson went on the same drugs, fell very ill, came off them and is still here to this day...
Both extremes are prisons whether liberal or conservative
@@rummanamoledina4973 nope.
This is so true,it hurts. 🎯
Diversity has done wonders for Leeds
@Itskilo Diversity ruins everything. That's why they are pushing it.
Leeds is fine it's mostly peaceful
@@ZM-dm3jg Don't ruin his evening!
That's quite an embarrassing thing to say
Lol yeah 'mostly peaceful' sure champ@@ZM-dm3jg
The closest thing to freedom comes from self-discipline. If I dont control my wants, they will control me.
"Seek freedom and become captive of your desires. Seek discipline and find your liberty."
-Frank Herbert
Well said.
The Three Slogans of The Uniparty:
SPEECH IS VIOLENCE
FREEDOM IS DANGER
DIVERSITY IS STRENGTH
@@RichardEnglander My generation was taught that opposite of "speech if violence." We were taught things like the "sticks and stones" saying. Crazy how fast it changed.
You forgot: Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.
@@user-un8ug7lx6c no I didn't, I wasn't trying to remember and repeat Orwell, just manipulated the slogans to fit today
@@Anne_Onymous yes indeed, we have Nanny State aka Big Mother, rights are to protect us from The State, now people want us protected against harsh criticism. It is all very sad
Wasn’t it SILENCE IS VIOLENCE.
After the Doha Debates, I'm not surprised.
I fear the future as well with all those enemies from within.
it would have been embarrassing if it wasn't frightening!
@@OmriGrin I just couldn't listen to it! I felt NAUSEATED listening to the venom spewing from that lot
@@manusha1349 It was a very hard video to watch, and I will presume being an Israeli made it even harder for me.
@@OmriGrin I feel your pain ♥️
@@OmriGrin it must be hard for you to watch! It's not normal to feel comfortable with the things Zionist "Israelis" do to Palestinians!! This is insane!
"I'm not feeling threatened by existence of minorities." - No one feels threatened by existence (except radicals), but by behaviour and motives.
Well said! It's not existence, but behaviors.
He said sexual minorities.
There are a lot of conservatives threatened by the widespread normalization of sexual minorities.
@@iddomargalit-friedman3897 I doubt it. They wouldn't mind if that sexuality isn't shoved like propaganda on parades, TV, mainstream media, culture etc.
Kisin's "I'm not feeling threatened" is his disingenuous way of saying "I disagree with those who are morally opposed to... but I'm going to avoid giving an actual argument against their position and instead misrepresent it (i.e., dismiss a straw man version of my opponents' view)."
Horrible virtue signalling by KK there I'm afraid. "Look at me, I'm not threatened" is the exact same rhetoric I get when I ask women why they tolerate men in female only changing rooms.
His reasoning for not being a conservative is the same reasoning I'd give to explain why I am a conservative. Historical definitions have changed, and what was classical liberalism is now conservatism
Not, we are just siding with the currently least mental cases, and right now the biggest crazies are the left. I will vote for conservatives atm, but I wouldn't call myself a conservative. Rather, in the eyes of the left, everything right of their views is conservative. Which also isn't the case, and is why so many people are now siding with the right, for now. As soon as you guys start pushing religious ideology, it becomes no different than the woke, and i find myself in the middle again. We are not the same, but i will ally up with you to protect our rights, and our freedom of speech. Because though i think religious ideologies are just as bad as woke ideologies, one is pushing for communist like ideals, and we can't allow that.
That is surely true for economics and a great extent individualism, but would you say that "conservatism" currently covers people defending, as Konstantin does when listing his motives against it, drugs and sexual minorities? I would say it usually doesn't.
@Roberto14091989 certainly factions of social conservatism wouldn't defend those issues. Libertarian conservatives would. That said, I don't think anyone other than the radical left would defend radical decrminalization of hard drugs or extreme gender ideology. Children permanently transitioning, for example.
@@marksaulnier2222 I used to consider myself a libertarian.
I used to favor decriminalizing all drugs.
I watched the results of that policy unfold out west.
I now oppose decriminalizing all drugs. It would be nice if people could be trusted to have enough self-control not to spiral into addiction at the slightest sign of trouble in their lives, but that has proven to not be the case.
Liberty only works for moral people. That means a strong cultural framework of values. Atomized individuals cannot successfully navigate freedom by themselves. There is too much to know.
@@dafunkmonster great comment. I couldn't agree more
I honestly feel like we'll be living in 1984.
Hard to not be terrified about the future.
You think we aren't? :)
Well it's 2024 so don't worry about going back in time
It’s more like a brave new world this world we live in
It's quite scary how well you can relate George Orwell's 1984 to our current situation.
@@xabre9995 1984 might apply somewhat to China, and even less to Russia, but certainly not to most western democracies. DEI and the woke seem to be on the wane. Even if Trump wins, it isn't the end of the world - just a few years moving in a direction some people feel is regressive (for very good reasons).
"When the left is in power, they move farther to the left, when the right is in power, they move slower to the left"
Tories moved left tho didn't they?
THATS WHAT HE SAID. RE READ IT.@@moodyonroody5313
😂
Ridiculous
What bonehead said that?
After your Doha appearance, I am scared too. The young people are completely and utterly deluded.
Most young men's world consists of video games and stuff like anime. Most young women social media tiktok insta. It's no wonder they know nothing about the world
And uneducated. E.G. an English girl who had no clue who Sir Winston Churchill was.
well that was really unfair selection and in that selection taking how far off they are.... actually if you looked really, really hard you could see a little climbs of sense... it has sent to sleep, but you can see, that there is something there... just hidden even from themselves.
To be fair, they were all Islamists. We only need to be fearful if we continue to let more of them in.
And the older people raised them. Don't cast all the blame on the young, they all learned through watching how the older generation did things.
"... a bird with one wing" good metaphor and very apt.
Yes - it has an interesting origin.
But we don't have a balance ... we have the left and the "left lite"
There’s so many of us who have the same views you do. Which makes me hopeful for the future.
"I'm not a conservative because -" ...Then proceeds to explain conservative beliefs from 1975
Umm.. Does he not know?
@@Corp-z2hI was just watching a Bush Jr town hall from back in the day, and the guy sounded perfectly reasonable compared to what we're dealing with now.
We don't have the power. The extremes who can and will create chaos they have the strength and power
@filmwhatmatters I agree with you, I talk with more people who think and feel the same way. I’m not a democrat but as a society we can’t vilify the opposing party. This video reads as a cautionary warning of a dangerous road we could be going down and the hard lessons that path will teach.
It is the literal Fibonacci sequence. Even our psychology follows this pattern. Just enough order to hold the chaos.
A great video. I am a small c conservative and I accept our friends on the left, they are free to live as they please in my opinion. I look forward to the day that they accept my life style choices and recognise my opinions and views are equally as valid as their own. We are not enemies we just need to behave like adults.
Unfortunately the left refuses to acknowledge any ideology or opinion that differs from theirs. They have become a cult. The truly neutral political view would be that of the libertarian, which I embrace for the most part. I would say I'm a right leaning libertarian. I find many of the new leftist ideologies appalling and destructive and they are NOT liberal by any means.
Live and let live
Yep, this. I'm Canadian and my family traditionally votes liberal. Which was traditionally viewed as the center party, with our goal in voting for it to be balance. I'm shocked when I see people trying to tell other people how to live. Most people can't manage their own lives, why the heck should they be taking a shot at anyone else's?
Wow, a sane, mature adult. Thank you.
Freedom is not unrestricted. True freedom requires morals to prevail.
Any civilization which does not focus on children and family is condemned
No longer hopeful in UK😢
Lived there for 4 years...hard to feel bad for them making fun of we Yanks and our *pew pews*....at least we have a chance. Make bed, lie in it.
Welcome to Leeds ... New Sharialand in England
@@Tearsofsoil got any evidence there bud? People have been saying this shit since the first wave of sub-continental Asians post World War II. Or are we "enlightened centrists" just getting all our news from twiiter bullshit and 4 second videos?
@@saucyrossy3698 Yes you have PEW PEWS but so does everyone else.
@@turokforever007it's only a tool, not everyone is a carpenter who swings a hammer.
I'm 65 now so I'm glad I won't be here to see whats coming.
You'll be reincarnated to see much worse
Sad but yes, agree with you ... I used to cry because I couldn't have children but now I'm not sad.
I'm 64. Depends on how fast it arrives, brother, it depends on how fast it arrives.
It's already here; it's just a question of how much time before it gets worse and to what degree...yet I remain hopeful nonetheless.
@@steelcrown7130Exactly!
Conservatism is not order forced by the state.
Conservatism is the natural state for most societies on this planet.
@@Jackripster69 It really depends upon how one chooses to define “left-right” or “liberal-conservative”.
These are highly subjective terms which it is rare for anyone to agree upon.
I think that in the sense that Konstantin was using them, he was implying that one or the other can result in a tyranny if it becomes extremist and polarized.
@@Jackripster69 As someone living in Britain who were under the Tories for 10 years I beg to differ. All governments regardless of the party enforce their nonsense onto people though. None of them can be trusted
@@glenncox9128 Well i cant recall anyone ever on the right ask to be controlled by govt. Maybe theres so fruitloop random out there, but they'd be less than .001%
Id define it pretty close to the English classical liberal.
Classical liberalism is a political tradition and a branch of liberalism that advocates free market and laissez-faire economics and civil liberties under the rule of law, with special emphasis on individual autonomy, limited government, economic freedom, political freedom and freedom of speech.
@@Jackripster69 There’s people who consider Nazi fascists as right wing, even though they’re not. But, like I said, it really depends on who you’re talking to.
The future will be what it has always been. A mixture of good and bad where the best move is to be flexible and willing to jump ship.
we are absolutely in an era of chaos. the problem is that the requests for a mild sense of order are being rejected by those on the drunken binge of being within chaos because they think it furthers themselves. You cannot keep going with chaos forever and, as we keep warning, the way back after chaos will be much worse. If anything the order type individuals, such as myself, are being incredibly restrained because we know there is great injustice, and ironically chaos, that can occur with high order regimes.
Compared to most of history since about 4000BC this one of the least chaotic times. War, death, upheaval, etc... was constant.
@@AlexRussell-kd9pd Social fabric is being actively destroyed. It does not matter what happened 2000 years ago.
BS. More people have been killed in wars since 1900 than all the wars combined before that.
Most of the people killed in the New World when Europeans arrived were killed by disease and not conflict.
@@AlexRussell-kd9pdWe are in absolute chaos because we are capable of way more damage than we ever were. So it doesn't quite make sense what you say
@@Strider1122 Short of a nuclear war, we are still on track to have the least number violent deaths as a percentage of the population this century compared to last the last few thousand years. The percentage of people living in extreme poverty has been reduced a huge amount in the last thirty years. Except for a few countries embracing authoritarianism, and the woke left becoming detached from reality politics is pretty stable too. Of course bad things will happen, but I'm not worried about losing my freedom or lifestyle in the next two decades.
The news is not a good place to get a feel for how things are going. Disaster and violence sell. Bland statistics about the crime rate going down, inflation improving, and world wide extreme poverty being greatly reduced don't get clicks.
Well said Konstantin, and yes, we are plummeting blindly to our demise.
What this guy does is mindf***ing.
*Larry Burkett's book on "Giving and Tithing" drew me closer to God and helped my spirituality. 2020 was a year I literally lived it. I cashed in my life savings and gave it all away. My total giving amounted to 40,000 dollars. Everyone thought I was delusional. Today, 1 receive 85,000 dollars every two months. I have a property in Calabasas, CA, and travel a lot. God has promoted me more than once and opened doors for me to live beyond my dreams. God kept to his promises to and for me*
There's wonder working power in following Kingdom principles on giving and tithing. Hallelujah!
But then, how do you get all that in that period of time? What is it you do please, mind sharing?
It is the digital market. That's been the secret to this wealth transfer. A lot of folks in the US and abroad are getting so much from it, God has been good to my household Thank you Jesus
Thanks to my co-worker (Michael) who suggested Ms Susan Jane Christy
She gave me the autonomy I need to learn at my own pace and ask questions when I need to she’s so accommodating.
Easy times create soft men. Soft men create hard times. Hard times create hard men. Hard men create easy times. It's all a never ending cycle that society just doesn't learn from.
Wow I always wondered why I am not really right or left, what am I and what I believe in, and I find myself exactly in the same position and state of mind just like you, thank you
Really? Even now? One side thinks men can menstruate, has a weird obsession with sexualizing small children, and thinks borders are racist. But sure virtue signal how moderate you are.
Being in the middle may sound open minded but I don’t see the logic of it. Does being in the middle mean you don’t recognize right and wrong or do you just not care?
@@meb280 being in the middle mostly means being self interested. Tolerance is when you don't agree with someone (you care about) ways of life, but you don't force changing this person anyway.
E.g. when your only child turns out to be gay and you are not happy about that, but you tolerate that. If there is no pain to bear there is no true tolerance, there is acceptance (approval) or indifference.
@@KunDziki Being on the Right, I don't care about changing this or that person's lifestyle, that's their business. What I do care about is them trying to get me to participate in a lie, by forcing me to buy in to saying it's all exactly equivalent. I think you largely have it backwards, we are not trying to change them, they are trying to change us.
@@meb280 yup. Conteporary leftists introduce problem of a small minority as a grand societal issue, trying to mold the majority for benefit of the minority.
Instead of focusing on real problems they diverge public attention to side topics.
You touched really imortant topic. What is the best methond of separation between truth-false.
I think that's main issue of division between lef-right. Other modern day disscusions are just product of this general topic.
“All of this has happened before. All of this will happen again.”
Who are you quoting?
They could have left the word marriage for the religious while civil unions granted all the same benefits as marriage. That would have been the compromise solution.
That's just stupid imho. If the government is involved in marriage which it is, then it should apply to anyone who applies for it equally. It's not a religious pulpit. Otherwise why wouldn't you object about non Christian straight people also being married by it? It isn't a statement on approved ways a couple should live in some Christian way of thinking.
No cause thats mean....because....'logic' or something. IDK.
Oh but then they wouldn't be able to thumb their nose at Christians, which was the point in the first place. Full disclosure: I'm not religious. I can just see the truth.
@@adrianbundy3249 Marriage was conceived and existed well before the 'state' decided it needed to get involved for tax purposes...
I appreciate the idea, but fundamentally, the issue is one of authority. Does the SCOTUS have the authority to force all states to permit gambling? No. Whether gambling in a state is legal or not is a state decision. The same thought applies to redefining marriage.. or to creating “civil unions”. I’m being technical, but homosexuals have ALWAYS had the right to marry. They simply couldn’t marry a person of the same sex… because that is not what the definition of “marriage” was. If one wants to change the definition of marriage, do so through our representative democratic process… by having state legislatures change the law.
I’ve known this for years. Society is at its best when it recognizes the yin yang and seeks harmony and balance.
It is at its worst when it degenerates into partisan extremist tribalism.
So true. Good to see sensible people here.
If one has a value system, they have opinions. If one expresses an opinion and defends it, they are being tribal. Therefore, the only way to not be tribal is to not have an opinion worth defending.
@@meb280 I know. I love all these "oh I'm exactly in the center" guys. Pick a fcuking side.
@@meb280 Tribalism implies far more than this, but I’m not going to bother explaining it.
@@meb280Tribalism means you have to 100% subscribe to the values, beliefs and opinions of the side you are on, or were born in some cases. Opinions aren't even formed, they are given from above and you must support and defend them and further your tribes interests over all others. Anything less means at best ostracism, at worst death.
I’ve just listened to the first bit of your video to see what you’re talking about and I don’t need to listen to anymore because I’m 67 now. and the one thing on my mind has been the 2020s are going in the same direction as the 1920s when I see young people, I feel sad because I think “you’re going to have to fight!” War is coming.
If you live long enough you will see all the horrors of humanity that it brings upon itself.
It seems evident that overcompensation is the human condition. Walking the middle is nearly impossible as a result.
@@parnpichate You think this just happened? I don't.
This was made to be.
All western countries have a large minority that is not a part of their nation, and that minority that keeps growing and growing and will eventually not be a minority but instead a majority.
Do you really think it's possible to come together as a nation and redirect our focus, to make long terms plans for a better future other than what the current trajectory has us pointed towards, when one third of the population has no kinship with you?
Will there even be any room for this proverbial pendulum that you fear to swing the other way? It's not 2 minutes to midnight yet, but indeed the 11th hour for the West.
We need to accept there may not be a pretty solution.
No, not when it’s the majority causing most of the damage.
These views represent the silent majority in Western Nations. This is why most of the time the political parties in charge are not too extreme on either end, as they generally sway center left or right. The issue is that the center parties have taken their citizens for granted and opened up opportunities for the extremes on either end to look appealing as the center has not listened to its citizen on core issues………it will be interesting how things play out.
war
I am afraid this is no longer acurate (has not been for a decade or two). While it is true many traditional ruling parties in the Western world have flocked around the centre (so the difference between the left and the right is waning) and distanced themselves from the citizens (their voters) it is not all.
(1) These 'uniparty' (to use the term most used in the US but valid almost everywhere) elites have grown strong disdain for the public and opinions of the citizens - elites believe to know best and citizens either share their views or are clearly stupid, unqualified, mislead by enemy propaganda or evil reactionaries - elites consider listening to these citizens to be wrong, they call it 'populist' to distiguish from their kind of good 'liberal' democracy (the term popular in EU) - which no longer works like democracy at all.
(2) Politics of these unchallenged ruling elites are shifting to the left or at least more government regulation, intervention and higher budgets (financed by taxes, debt and inflation) mostly not because of ideological reasons but because it gives governments more power and resources and opportunities for corrupt cooperation with large corporations. Ruling elites tend to restrict individual freedoms too - again simply to secure their power.
(3) At certain point many in these elites (both in governments and corporations) started to entertain radical far left policies - fascinating subject as most of them probably do not wish these policies to reach their ultimate revolutionary goals but they still support them for various reasons (until the very last moment - e.g. when looting mob reaches their own residence)
So, while I agree the silent majority of citizens has traditionally been (and hopefully still is) non extremist and that it used to keep societies stable, I believe the politics of the ruling elites are neither centrist nor actually reflecting views of this silent majority. Chances for a purely good way out of this are slim. The silent majority can see their representatives no longer representing them, the system no longer working as intended and just keeping appearances (as KK described a while ago) and citizens are reevaluating their calm silent strategy that lead them here.
Too much of everything makes you sick.... Too much of harmful makes you dead...Prosperous Life is about wisdom of deciding how to balance between reasonable risk And disciplined responsibility....
"I wish it need not have happened in my time, said Frodo. So do I, said Gandalf, and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us" - JRR Tolkien (Lord of the Rings).
Brilliantly said, Konstantin! This is no longer a choice between liberal and conservative, it's a battle between Good and Evil! We have to decide what's worth saving and be prepared to walk into Mordor to fight for it! No harm in drinking some champagne on the way ... 🥂
Wow, thanks for that quotation from LOTR! I didn't even read the rest of your comment because I was so blown away by it.
@DonnaBrooks you're welcome ♥️ always hope my comments will have an impact on at least one person, so thank you 😊
As I've gotten older, my values have definitely moved from left to conservative, based on the reality that we will also not survive if we aren't having enough babies to preserve our species. It gets down to biology. However, am also critical of authority.
Me too - but sometimes we have to act.
We are having PLENTY of babies to preserve our species! Good grief! The population has steadily been rising throughout history and the only setback was the Black Death. There were 4.5 billion people on Earth in the early to mid- 80s, when I was in college. Now we are over 8 billion. That's almost doubling the population in only 40 years. What YOU fear is that there are not enough Brits or Americans or Europeans to preserve that culture. Don't worry about the species. Every problem we have is exacerbated by more people. With fewer people, there would be way more of everything to go around, less pollution, less crime, less stress, less waste, and more land for nature to thrive. The 6th mass extinction is happening now because of human activities. There are only 80 Sumatran rhinos left in the world. There are 191 kakapos. There are 8.1 billion humans. The only thing that will drive us to extinction is if we destroy our life support system, the Biosphere. Earth will remain. Life on Earth may not. And for the first time, a single species has the ability to wipe out life on Earth. Not even ants, which outnumber us, or microbes have ever done that.
We saw the wonders of diversity and multiculturalism in Leeds last night.
To avoid disaster we have to work together. Unfortunately the only groups I see working together seem to have totalitarian tendencies: UN, WHO, WEF, EU , G7 etc.
The story that is being written has rhymed over and over and over when one looks back into history. The stories change but the paths and outcomes are close enough to be considered the same.
Human hubris and arrogance leads this way. Always has.
At some point, the beast called Man will learn, but it doesn't look like any time soon.
But I am still hopeful because better people have lived through worse with less. It's all a matter of who is willing to stand and simply say "No."
Oh, plenty of people have said no.
I think JFK was the first.
This entire culture is being cultivated. It is not "the times", but the planning and execution by the few and their institutions (which by now are most of our institutions - media, Uni's, ngo's, supranational institutions etc).
Konstantin: "I am very concerned by the direction our society is moving"
Konstantin in less than 5 minutes after initial statement: "I actually like the degenerate elements who causes the destabilization of the society"
Like... what?
He just outed himself.
True
Yes, I've been of this political opinion for years. I began using the term 'politically non-binary' way before KK did. I'm glad to hear someone with a platform such as KK is talking actual, proper sense. Bravo sir.
I just feel 'politically homeless' these days.
@@philipwilkie3239 Me too. Which is why I've abandoned the idea of being 'of a political party'. And when the voting system in Britain is so unfair, I often wonder what's the point of voting at all when a party can get 4m votes and get significantly fewer seats that other parties with significantly fewer votes than them.
@@derekspitz9225 It's exactly why New Zealand abandoned FPP in the 90's.
I have virtually the same beliefs as you do, but have no problem considering myself a conservative. I disagree that conservatism is primarily concerned with the preservation of order. Who was more concerned with that than the Soviets? Conservatisms primary concern is preservation of traditional values and respect for the accomplishments of the past, as well as the primacy of common sense over idealism. If anything, you trend toward libertarian rather than Jacobin or Marxist values. You are on our side, whether you think you are or not! And I’m glad you are!
I think the issue is that in order to achieve equality they destroy or fundamentally undermine norms which provide the structure that allows the society to function. They insist that low-status and taboo practices are equal to high status practices and as such whole generations fall prey to dysfunctional and detrimental choices that they would have otherwise avoided. Hedonism- for example no longer being judged negatively is massively subversive.
Yep, they seem to want no norms. Except for the norms they will inevitably mandate.
It's not the hedonism, it's the lack of any notable substance. That is what makes it bad.
Spot on. From Ireland 🍀
It is difficult for me to trust a video like this that does not prompt CZcams to add their qualifying tag like, "The CDC has..." or "An overwhelming majority of scientist agree that climate change.." or "The Insurrection on January 6..." or any other number of irrefutable statements.
The real battle is between collectivism and individuality, not chaos and order.
Fear is the mindkiller
Righteous exalts a nation not order and chaos in happy tension. When I know I'm ultimately accountable to someone far supreme to me I will live my horizontal life with my head always tilted Heavenward.
Konstantin, please change your views on drug legalisation!
As a former drug user, I can tell you legalisation probably would work for people such as yourself, successful people that have it all together personally. The problem is, most people don't have it all together and lack the discipline required to keep these things under control. Often, too, people are exposed to these substances when they are too young and when the brain is still developing. Also, there is a very strong link between drug use and mental illness. Speaking as a father, I don't want to increase my son's access to these things, I want to decrease access. I hope that as a person with some influence you might reevaluate your view on this matter.
What I find peculiar about our generation and the rampant over liberalisation we suffer, is that we look in awe and envy at countries like Japan, yet at the same time we completely reject the conservative social structures necessary to attaining such a state.
The questions I like to ask are, would you be comforted to know that the babysitter for your kids had just smoked a joint? How about your surgeon or airline pilot?
I would De-criminalise ALL drugs.
See Netherlands & Portugal as examples.
@Deadguy1988 Decriminalisation and legalisation are different things. I too am for decriminalisation, to a degree, at least for the user, though not so much for the dealers.
Advocates of drug use so often point to the Netherlands as the exemplar that it has become a cliché. Things in the Netherlands aren't quite as squeaky clean as you might think. Based on anecdotal data, it would seem things are trending downwards. I would also add that such things are not a one size fits all solution. Perhaps it did once work in the Netherlands, and maybe it will work in Portugal, for a while, this doesn't mean it will work for the UK, US, Canada, Australia, or New Zealand. Though all countries are majority European ethnicity, there are differences in culture and education which all have an impact on the outcome of such policies. I suspect for the UK things wouldn't be quite so rosy.
He should look at the videos in America in the places its been legalised and what its done there.
@@meb280legalising it doesn’t mean irresponsibility, alcohol is legal but I don’t assume my pilot would turn up drunk.
Why I do not fear the future: Jesus is still the Lord of lords and King of kings. No matter what happens, God is in control. My hope is in him.
You brilliantly and precisely articulated my political / philosophical position. On social media, the extreme left /wokes accuse me of being from the right/conservative and all kinds of 'phobes' and the right call me leftist/woke. idgaf. Balance, equilibrium has always been and will always be best and healthiest.
Exaplain extreme woke in one sentence
Can't read? I said extreme left / woke. Google what a "/" means
Give a example of the extreme right wing Calling you woke. For me a so called extreme right wing. Is saying its for freedom of speech. But then Calling out those protesting against Israel genocide in Gaza. Are mostly Muslims. Now Give your.
We all know what woke is at this point. This whole "define it" thing is just mental gymnastic from the woke. It's extremist leftist identity politics.
I enjoy listening to your podcast. Many of us that have not understood increasingly radical ideas have few places to go for balanced, nuanced discussions. Thank you.
The game of life.
Somehow the dancing girls ( and boys ) have distracted the men ( and women ) from the game.
It is the literal Fibonacci sequence. Even our psychology follows this pattern. Just enough order to hold the chaos.
Worry I don't get your point
@@ipercalisse579 I understand your cryptiscism.
“Happiness and freedom begin with a clear understanding of one principle. Some things are within our control, and some things are not. It is only after you have faced up to this fundamental rule and learned to distinguish between what you can and can't control that inner tranquility and outer effectiveness become possible.”
~ Epictetus
Kostantin 's observation of the need for balance echoes what Thomas Sowell said: 'There are no solutions, only compromises'. I am sure of it. What has happened to make people think that heading to one or other extreme is going to be the answer to all their woes?
Lack of any substance did.
These kids know absolutely nothing and they are being lied to in grotesque ways - right in the schools we send them to.
'There are no solutions, only tradeoff'. FTFY
Order is literally what a civilized society is. Anyone that says they don’t want order first, has never read a history book. Without order, we’re just cavemen throwing crap at each other. And it makes us all better for agreeing to live in a particular way, under an established rule of law.
Exactly. And being reasonable is definitely not the answer to overcome the unreasonable. Hate to sound like a comment section edgelord, but we can only turn things around with a good dose of the most extreme aspects of both political sides; catholic conservatism and soviet militarism lol
While I share your sentiment, I worry for a different reason.
You are correct that people in the past have tried to force others to fit into their order and usually through violence. I do agree that people should be allowed to do what they want as long as it doesn't infringe on others.
What I worry about is the pendulum swinging the other way too hard. I can't speak for the UK but I've run across people these days who hate when you have individual freedom and do as you want in reverse. I've met those who shame you when you don't want to date transpeople, or black people or a number of other categories. You're called an incel or some other derogatory term for standing on your own.
People should always have freedom of choice, but I think that humans will always try to coerce others into partaking with them. The pendulum is swinging the opposite way and I've been in conversations where people didn't take kindly to me saying no to things I didn't want.
I pray for a better future for us all.
Exactly. The bikinis want all in a bikini and the burkhas want all in burkhas. And not even sometimes this or that. Everytime
yes pendulum goes both ways- far right men are basically islam men without asking the head covering. No wonder Tate went to islam. Litterally I was scared when I read the comments on certain podcasts. Especially when the guest was women and was not hard core red pill or the theme was near the realtions of men and women nowadays.
Look at the Weimar Republic, especially in Berlin. That was swinging really far to the left (very similar to today’s society) then look at what happened.
Real-ish, I feel exactly like you do and I couldn’t have articulated half as well as you did. This new trend is upsetting and worrisome.
If Konstantin Kisin, a Jewish emigré from Russia to Britain, feels worried about the future.
Then this is a good thing. It means Weimar Republic is coming to an end.
All the reasons Konstantin gives why he's not a conservative seem to be based on a caricature of what conservatives believe, widely believed by the Left. What's he's describing is a reactionary, not a conservative. To quote David Cameron: "I don't support same-sex marriage despite being a conservative, I support same-sex marriage because I am a conservative."
My thoughts exactly.
I think he’s referring to American 🇺🇸 conservatism, which is different from UK 🇬🇧 conservatism
Moderation in virtually all things.
To define conservatism and liberalism as purely social concepts is I think to miss the point a little bit. We also have financial conservatism and liberalism. We have political or governmental conservatism and liberalism. These concepts are not just something to be played out in the social arena.
I have always found it hard to verbalize why I don't consider myself a conservative, even though I'm may seem outwardly so. You just nailed it Konstantin, thankyou.
So. You're centrist. Glad we cleared that up. Good stuff.
Centrists accept and respect diversity - just not unbounded chaos.
@@philipwilkie3239 agreed. I’d describe myself as centrist so I share a kindred here.
Congratulations Konstantin, you just rediscovered Fusionism!
Once they've got you by the Digital nuggets, your done !
@dogmadogma5398 I agree and fear it. Then WHY did they bring in half of Africa and Arabs if we'll all face the same faith?
I am a devout Christian. I am conservative; not Republican, actually conservative. However, I agree with most of the views you stated.
The classical difference of conservative vs liberal is not the ultimate goal, merely the approach to getting there. The chasm only tends to grow and there is diminishing ground for someone to stand mid-chasm.
Basically this is the premise of the Tv., Show ' Babylon 5 ' . Every 1,000 years the Galaxy goes through a reset between ' Order & Chaos ' . The 2 Primary Species are the Vorlons ( Light & Order ) and the Shadows ( Dark & Chaos ) . The 2 sides build their ' Sibling ' Societies according to their Capacities and then the Great War happens . According to the Shadows , some of the civilizations are lost forever but the survivors come out stronger and better equipped for the next 1,000 years . The storyline begins with the war between Earth and Minbar . As the series progresses the viewers learn that the Minbari are in a state of population decline , each new generation is fewer in number and seems to have lost their ' Greater Souls ' . During the Earth / Minbar War the Minbari captured ships belonging to Earth and their occupants ' scanned ' which reveals that the Minbari Souls were going to the Humans of Earth . To stop the losses on both sides , Minbar surrenders on their brink of annihilating the Humans at Earth . Eventually as the time of the ' Great 1,000 years War ' is upon the entire Galaxy , the joint War Fleet of Earth and Minbar ends the War by ' Kicking the Vorlons and Shadows ' out of the known Galaxy permanently with the help of Lorian ( The eldest of the older Races ) .
The goal as set by ' Babylon 5 ' Producers is to strike a balance between Order & Chaos within a Society .
Oh my gosh i loved that show. One of the most underrated sci fi shows ever IMO
The irony of bringing gay marriage into this discussion, is that more relationships are subject to Government regulation than previously.
Genuine “chaos” would be getting Government out of the marriage business altogether.
Each to their own (within the moral compass) don’t force it on me and don’t push it in my face. Don’t infringe on anyone else’s ability to live.
And this example/cautionary message of 1920s France just _before_ the odious Olympic Opening Ceremony.
QED, KK. 👍
The landscape of "Conservative" and "Liberal" has shifted wildly.
Conservative is not what it was in the 90s. I would hope that anyone paying attention would recognize that.
Also, conservatives wildly disagree about anything and everything.
How about an example? I believe that religious marriage and other marriage should be separate so that there is a separation of church and state. If a church or mosque or any religious establishment does not want to disobey their beliefs then they will not be forced to by the government (Bake me a cake).
Religious freedom is far more important. I do not care if people want to be gay and get married, but there MUST be a separation of church and state.
Women working. I guess my only real opinion of this is that it pretty much started as a corporate scam, but I don't think people want it to change. Work sucks. I have a great job, but if I could not work and still make money, I would do a million other things. I would say a big problem that SHOULD be solved in America is that women have a choice to and are HEAVILY pushed to work, but honestly most women do not have a choice NOT to work. A good friend of mine recently had a child and his wife had to return to work after only a few weeks post-birth. She was crying about how she wishes she could stay home with her daughter, but they cannot afford it. I would say this is a pretty massive problem in this country. Both people are working so they have to leave a 1.5-2 month old baby to be raised by .... ??? Someone??? Parents hopefully? Maybe a super expensive babysitter? But then do you feel comfortable leaving an extremely dependent human in the hands of some random person you found on the internet?
Forcing a baker to bake a cake against their religious beliefs is something that the progressive left does, not conservatives. Also, if women didn't work, and we had the more traditional society like what we had in the "old" days, the cost of living would be less, there would be more jobs, and wages would be higher. Women working just means the labor pool is larger so companies can pay less.
Personally I find myself to be more Libertarian in my political views but I will not mince words when I say that the LGBTQ culture is disgusting these days and they have perversed the whole movement. I voted to allow gay marriage but now these people want special protections and rights that the rest of us don't have. That's what happens when you "give an inch".
People are being discouraged from reproducing
@@vectoreyes Yes, I'm speaking as a conservative. I'm saying these are my beliefs "As a conservative" - Opposed to Konstantine's belief that conservatives are a rigid monolith that all believe the same thing.
Religions doesn’t mean conservatism. Religion is more liberal guided shared beliefs.
Poorer women have always worked outside the home. They were teachers, nurses, secretaries, bank tellers, and worked in factories. Even housewives sold or traded goods they'd make. Baking and decorating cakes, canned goods, clothing they made, quilts, etc. Studies show the majority of women want to stay at home and raise families. That's why many didn't re-enter the workforce following the lockdowns. They figured out you can do it, it just takes budgeting and doing without every new gadget. Democrats and some Republicans openly chastised them for not going back to work. I know what his fear is, and knowing that little fact tells me it's pretty unfounded. The US also has been through extremely similar situations repeatedly and that did not happen.
Romans 3:10-18
[10]As it is written, There is 🔹️none🔹️ righteous, no, not one:
[11]There is 🔹️none🔹️ that understandeth, there is 🔹️none🔹️ that seeketh after God.
[12]They are all gone out of the way, they are together become unprofitable; there is 🔹️none 🔹️that doeth good, no, not one.
[13]Their throat is an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips:
[14]Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness:
[15]Their feet are swift to shed blood:
[16]Destruction and misery are in their ways:
[17]And the way of peace have they not known:
[18]There is no fear of God before their eyes.
You say what I have been saying all along in a better framed picture than I can. Moving too far to try and restore order will lead us into peril. Our freedoms and rights stripped away because we marched straight into the fire thinking we were fighting to restore order… “it’s not the wolves the sheep should fear, it’s the Shepard “
Marriage has been affected by opening it up to same sex relationships. It is because that view of equality changes the basis of marriage from being based on a lifelong love covenant to being constructed around romantic love. The latest pillar to be chipped away is no-fault divorce. Marriage was socially constructed as the best way to create stable society by sacralising the covenant love relationship in marriage which produced the best society for raising socially integrated children and so securing the future!
Balance.
Ballance. Nice game.
Academically this all sounds great " i do not crave order and i do not fear chaos" but practically there is no structure or layed foundation to live by those priniples. What does chaos that goes to far look like and how do you stop it, when do you call something out of order and how do you put it back in order? Secularly imo there is no possibility for this to work bc in the end those are moral frameworks you have to lay out and secularism has no moral basis to even begin these frameworks/structures.
Yep Konstantine should read more Nietzsche, nobody understood these problems better than Nietzsche
Exactly, as Thomas Sowell has mentioned, "When the left is in power, they move farther to the left, when the right is in power, they move slower to the left". This "middle ground" doesn't exist because it has no absolute foundation, the shift of what is right presently is the supposed standard that will only go further like everyone living has known too late before that.
indeed.
You have eloquently stated almost exactly how I view the world. It's good to know I'm not alone!
Those are not components of the conservatism I accept.
I absolutely agree that we have to be able to come together in order to thrive/survive.
I'm 25 and I am also concerned about where the Western world is heading. But I am ready to fight today for the rights our ancestors died for. I know that there are many others of my generation who feel the same. We are not all loopy queers for Palestine.
From a baby boomer to a Gen Z - I'm hearing you are bucking the tide of societal decay. You are taking a different route than the so-called social justice warriors. Hoping you win! God bless.
From my understanding of UK politics, the conservatives we have in the USA are significantly more right wing than yours in the UK. Makes the discussion more complicated.
Not really. They say the same things. Just in the US they follow through on some of them sometimes.
conservatist in UK are not conservativist even in Europe standards. They are not even moderate or center... best describe conservative left.
@@debanydoombringer1385 since you are familiar with US politics, what is your opinion on why the KKK votes Republican in every election and outright endorses Republican candidates?
The KKK was founded by Democrats! Read some history and turn off MSNBC.
@@cowmath77where do you get that from? Where do they post this information?
I love everything you said and I’m also scared for the future.
It would be nice if we would strive for that middle ground and I actually think many people would agree with your assesment. A differentiated view is not good for the algorithm howewer, because the extreme positions carry more emotion and that is what draws attention. I really wonder if social media will manage to tear our society apart.
Sadly, social media has been doing exactly that for the last decade since the whole TQI+, Black Lives Matter and XR/JSO activists got a foothold.
There is one thing that all respect, even if they don't like it. And that is the will and capability to project power.
So do it.
It does not matter what they call you. They will concede, with or without them liking you. All there is.
Is it sad it should come to that? Yes.
the winter is coming
You can't have order and chaos. Each will fight to dominate the other.
You should know better than to attend plays in New York nowadays.
This is the most I've ever felt I understand you and the most I've ever felt I agree with you Konstantine
Conspiracy deniers run around in circles sometimes
Like how I explained politics to my kid. It's like a pendulum scale that constantly needs rebalancing. No one person should be completely left or right. You vote to maintain balance. Only people who are sheeple or NPCs identify wholeheartedly with one ideology or another.
Getting gay folks to get married has always seemed essentially conservative to me
No.
In what way?
So what is it going to be, ordered chaos, or chaotic order?
Lem+pits+ka. That's how you pronounce her name.
That’s what you got out of this?
@@PWizz91 In honour of the artist, it is also necessary to pronounce their name correctly.
More like "Wem"
@@daniel.lopresti true. Proposed the easier way.
I am completely in solidarity with Konstantin.
Why I am not afraid;
Romans 8
35 Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword?
36 As it is written, For thy sake we are killed all the day long; we are accounted as sheep for the slaughter.
37 Nay, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him that loved us.
38 For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come,
39 Nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.
Free people should have the right to live their lives unencumbered by the ideas and dogmas of others.
Have no fear coward for I am here.
Tamara de Lempicka is one of my favourite artists 🥰❤️
Everything I need to know about humanity I learned from Milgram.
Individuals are the most important people on the planet and should be able to choose their own levels of rigidity and openness (order/chaos) as long as it doesn't harm other individuals.
I don't want to live under a hammer/sickle, a swatstika, a rainbow or Antifa or a white hood or a black mask.
A society’s quality comes from the cumulative virtue and functionality of the individuals that constitute it. Therefore it is impossible for someone to take action and not have an effect on society. Not talking about whether you buy brand name ketchup or the store brand but things of moral consequence like sexual behavior.
Can’t like this enough. ❤❤❤❤❤
Everything in balance. Perhaps all Government should be a coalition of left and right thinking. Common sense over ideological dogma. Compromise over confrontation. People say I’m a dreamer.
No worries Mr. K! Things will reassert themselves, 'jaw-jaw' will replace 'war war' people nowadays, as people of the past, have no appetite for sustained effort that doesn't benefit them directly.
The greater good is the greatest justification for most atrocious crimes.