Lots of species will go extinct alongside us. But ultimately, nature as a whole will reborn. I've seen simulations and read some work about how much carbon dioxide is going to be left. And one scientists finds that even after/if emissions end, there's going to be 25% of that human made CO2 circulating for few millennia after it is finally phased out by natural processes. So it is crazy because it means this shit lasts more than radioactive waste does. It all compares to Earth being that big organism undergoing chemiotherapy to get rid of those parasites that invaded it. But if we fuck up things too much and make this planet unlivable- no crops, no food, hardly breathable air then WE WILL be gone. With all our technological might we are too weak: not asvanced enough to sustain ourselves in space in some spacecraft, we don't have any habitable planet in the vicinity, no technology to make any planet habitable and no space faring technology to take us farther away in space to find anything habitable. So to sum up- if we screw it here, qe are screwed. And what pains me the most is that it really all comes dowb to fossil fuels and oil companies that are majority if the 100 companies that commit to over 50% emissions. Few oil giants holding senators and politicians by their balls, concerned only for quick buck and literally stealing our children's futurecaway from us. And majority of people sit on their asses while we should be out on the streets DEMANDING for these fat, fed and rich to the extreme old prick mother fuckers to cease their shit, contribute to transformation. They take trillions in subsidies and earn more trillions themselves not fucking counting the shit they keep on theur private accounts- they should be fucking financing all the renewable energy shift and electric car industry. And in turn, they sit ever more fat and content and are withholding all changes. I tell you- if nothing changes, in few decades from now, people are going to tear them apart
@@MarymonckiJohn based and redpilled. Nonetheless, the more the earth hurts, the worse humans get because with a loss of biodiversity brings an increase of CO2, heat, erosion, and disease. Humans are going to die, and thats enough of a reason to fight climate change
So true. This is the worst Joe Rogan podcast I’ve ever seen. A journalist from New York. Of course he’s an alarmist. The weather has always been changing… lookup the “Younger Dryas,” where The climate temperature changed 18°F in under a decade. We will adapt. Lmao, this dude is a professional alarmist, government propaganda agent.
I love climate and anti science people using George as their spokesman. However they missed the key point he said which is “the earth will be fine, it’s humans that are fucked”. To stop climate change is not to save the earth, the earth will be fine. Its to stop us from going back to the stone age.
@@slamrock17 If u don´t know who Eddie bravo is, he believes a lot of conspiracy theories like the earth is flat and other stuff like that so i don´t believe that snippet is misrepresentive.
@@suprememuppetkermit9944 I am playing devils advocate. You say you don't believe that is misrepresentative but you don't know for sure. That is the point. Truth is not the same as confirmation bias. He may believe the earth is not round but your oversimplification of his ideology is disconcerting. Let people disagree with his ideas not false ideas thrown out there.
Nature always wins, there's probably aliens that have been watching us since the beginning and there probably making bedts on how where going to all die.
we will continue too, climate change is not a threat to humankind, it is a threat to huge population numbers. Not to minimize how drastic the effects of climate change are going to be, but that is an important distinction people need to see. many people may die, humankind could survive MUCH worse than the effects of global warming even if ALL of the inorganic carbon on earth was released into the atmosphere.
"If we can build over the next decade or two build Global plantations of these carbon capture machines we could actually stop the problem or reverse it a bit." You mean sortof like trees?
@@DaManBearPig actually they are as the earth is greener than it has ever been in human history. thats a fact. co2 is plant food. its actually better for plant life .
@@NocturnalIntuition the earth is in no way shape or form greener as it has ever been. We are loosing 10 billion trees a year. And CO2 is not just fuel for plants, if the concentration of it is too high plants die out. Just like sunlight, when they get too much sun a day the leaves start to die.
@@NocturnalIntuition moreover with increase plant groath comes increased water consumption. Making areas with an unseartain water supply even more prwwn to drouths. Areas like south Afrika or India.
@@elmihox6969 i think its cute that you thought i just picked my comment out of the air. however if you look it up you would see that theres plenty to back up what i said. even nasa (the guys in space who look down on our planet and report back what they see) say the earth has been significantly gettting greener over the past 2 decades
fermi paradox, we probably never found aliens yet cause the great filter could be overcoming climate change which means we might not have much time left
Thats exactly what I was thinking about a couple of days ago. If I had to pinpoint a filter for the fermi paradox its either the evolution of big brains and a body thats able to make tools or this.
So should we plug every Volcano b/c over the past 12 months volcanoes around the world have pumped more carbon and contaminants into the atmosphere than North America has since the industrial age began.
It's an interesting point. Too little fossil fuels a society might never develops past a certain point. Too much fossil fuels and they cook themselves. However, there's a morbid caveat here. Even if climate change kills billions of humans. The loss of billions of humans in a century on a scale of the Fermi paradox is nothing, if we bounce back without the explosive energy potential
No they aren’t. A lot of them are probably people like me, who actually live in these places and see how incorrect his narrative is, or have live long enough to see how incorrect all the narrstives have been for the last 40 years and are skeptical.
India and China worry me the most as they have giant populations with ridiculously large cities many of which are near the coast. Where will all these people go? Also, the majority of China's potable water comes from the south. These areas will become more prone to flooding as time goes on...so...where will their safe drinking water come from? One of the main sources of water for India is glacial melt...hard to get any more water once those glaciers are gone. That whole region of the world will be properly fooked.
it amazes me that the right wing anti imigration lot are also climate change denialists who will see a massive influx greater than ever before when this hits home at least a billion people are likely to become homeless because oof climate change im 61 have no kids and am happy about my siruation
The last 2 mins are among the most powerful non fiction video seen I've seen. Only critique: I think David doesn't quite grasp how interdependent and fragile our financial and economic systems are. Climate chaos will bring multiple Black Swan events that will wreak havoc on the global economic systems. 2008 was a rainy day for the economy compared to the financial monsoon that will hit us. I seriously doubt that anyone except the top 1% will be financially "alright".
@@ivandobrev2240 Solid point. I think they know that and will be converting as much funny money into hard assets as they can. And also, you're right, they still won't be "alright"...unless they and their descendants consider living in an underground silo "alright".
I think he gets it. It would be very hard for him not to after so much research. But what are we going to do? Nihilism really isn't my thing, and when it comes to climate matters, it's hard to find any middle ground between denialists and nihilists, and this is going back quite a ways, long before we were this fucked, so I think it's an easy psychological coping mechanism to be one or the other.
@@squamish4244 You're probably right, nihilism may be a coping mechanism for confronting such a "big" problem that's outside our individual control. At the same time, however, our civilization being "doomed" may also be true. Much like the old joke, "Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't watching you." The long established trend certainly points in that direction. But you know valar, even if we are, we still have to pay our bills everyday, want to see our friends and family, and basically life goes on. Until it doesn't.
@@terryhasan The problem with nihilism is it is a self-fulfilling prophecy. I don't like to see a lot of people retreat into nihilism just as world government are finally coming around to face this enormous task. And we don't know what sort of technologies lie on the horizon that could help get us out of this mess. We know some that could do it now. Carbon capture and sequestration would cost between $3-$5 trillion a year to bring CO2 levels down to...wherever we want. That used to seem like a huge number until 2020. The world initially responded terribly to Covid, but then it moved with incredible speed. In a stunning 8 months vaccines were produced. Many countries did successfully impose lockdowns that saved countless lives. The man-children running the world at the time did the worst. (More women in power, now!) My frustration is that on many climate videos where people DO take the science seriously, the comment sections are loaded with nihilists. If you even try to talk about solutions they don't want to hear it. I've been involve in renewable energy by way of my dad's career for 30 years, and if anyone should be a nihilist it it him, but he's not. It does a grave disservice to all the people who have fought so hard to make this planet better to just go "awww fuck it" if you've done nothing yourself. And you're right. You have to act as if your children and future grandchildren in my case have a future...or even yourself, if you've still got 50-60 years left (or more - who knows where gerontology research is headed). You just can't go to the hopeless place.
@Andy Z Human activity does effect the climate but we really don't know to what degree. It could be neglible. Ice core samples show the Earth used to have even more carbon than it does now and went through much warmer periods. So what conclusions can you draw? The 97% consensus is a myth. What else you got?
@@Unriven I have this weird feeling you know exactly nothing about climate science, and your knowledge is limited to regurgitating slogans and shaming skeptics with insults.
People living off the grid will fare no better than city dwellers cause when the millions of people in cities are forced to move they will inundate the off grid people like a huge wave,no one will be spared.
@@SliceofBread123 Well, I'm not sure he is a fraud but he certainly doesnt offer any real evidence to back his hell on earth claims. I was actually thinking, he is a writer, he gets paid to bring in audiences in order to make money, the darker the story and the more end of times illustrations the bigger the audience and the more money his company makes. So to him I would say, nice story bro. I also find it funny how many times scientist and climate predictors have predicted the end of the world as we know it and either are completely incorrect (Al Gore, who made millions with his end of the world predictions) or keep pushing the destruction of mankind via climate change further and further into the future. The only ones going RRREEEEE are the leftist globalist who love to fear monger by pushing the climate change holocaust meanwhile making billions in profit and raising taxes to furtheRRREEEEE claiming this will solve all our climate problems meanwhile causing more RRREEEE because the earth is going to end in 12 years if we dont. The only ones going RRREEEE is the left and their NPC followers.
The Fundamental Elements of Free Speech But haven't the shitty weather phenomenona been increasing in both frequency and severity recently? Like heatwaves, wildfires and hurricanes? And even if something that they predicted was going to happen didn't happen the way or at the time they described it would, it still doesn't mean it isn't going on or not going to happen.
regardless if climate change is man made or not sea levels will still rise and the climate will be different so when you argue this you completely avoid the point that humanity will be affected.
Ok so like dude wow climate change ok like so 30 years of co2 ok like so you know dude wow i am terrified of the world in like 12 years dude wow. I agree. He sounds like the male version of a female that talks like this "Like oh my god, like you know right? like oh my god."
@BallTistic Screecher It's simple, CO2 is a green house gas, green house gases trap heatin the atmosphere, which raises the temperature of the earth, if this change happens faster than the ecosystem can adapt to it there will be catastrophy as many species like bees will die. Let's try to reduce the CO2 we produce. Can it be any simpler than that? The only problem is that eould impede the sales of oil and coal as they produce a lot of CO2, and they lobby to shut climate change scientists up. Where is the bullshit exactly?
@BallTistic Screecher absolutely. Im a millennial and I used to believe in their propaganda till I decided to research it for myself. I looked into what climate scientist in the skeptic community had to say and read some of the peer reviewed papers from alarmist... They contradict themselves in peer reviewed papers... so I can't help but wonder who is reviewing them.
@BallTistic Screecher That's not what scientists say, that's just what you've heard from a right wing activist or politician, which just happens to serve their agenda. It would be better to try and prevent any kind of catastrophe if we can instead of saying oh whatever guess we'll just die.
I like how the thumbnail has a picture of cooling towers. That gas you see coming out of them? Steam. Water in the vapor phase. Oh dear!!! Not steam!!!!
@@SteveSmith-fh6br A few were off, most were right though. Most predictions by a large number of scientists have come true for the most part. Most models have been fairly accurate as well. I'll trust an entire field of science over bloggers that have a GED.
Random dumb fuck posts random Wordpress site links explaining how there's no fucking experts on climate science which is like presenting no evidence at all in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Why the fuck are you appealing to the authority of a painfully fucking random and 100% obvious propaganda website to peddle your asinine bullshit?
Here's a question if you're concerned about CO2. Are you in favor of increasing Nuclear to replace Fossil Fuel ennergy? Nuclear is the only alternative to replace CO2 at a large scale. Wind/Solar can replace some but has limitations.
Perhaps, but consider how many cars there already are. Even if you put scrubbers in every car, the amount of GhG exhaust they still put out won’t be offset by the scrubbers.
Just a heads up, SpecTech, water vapor "Steam"" retains much more heat than CO2.Heat retention = climate change. Don't believe me take a chemistry class. Just trying to help a brother out. The more you know :) P.S. Do I care about Climate change? No
Steam can easily condense back into water and turn into rain. CO2 or Carbon monoxide does not readily condense under normal atm and heat conditions. CO2 is actually worse because of this because it doesn't transfer heat as well as h20 nor does it condense into a heavier form of matter well. Fact is, it's the combination of both elements being displaced from their local habitat that is making the biggest impact on living species. Moving Carbon into the air creates localized heat zones then that turns water into to steam>clouds/storms> which moves to a new location thanks to aerodynamics and condenses and falls where it wasn't originally. Thus the age old complaint of melted glaciers. The ice caps melting within itself isn't the problem, its the relocation of mass amounts of water and its oceanic rise relative to the atmosphere which allows the water to vaporize much quicker and cause more storms.
@@Themayseffect I agree with the words you have typed but I was specifically talking about the *steam* in the thumbnail, but water vapor can't just be written off. NASA can explain it better then I can " *"Water* *Vapor* *Confirmed* *as* *Major Player* *in* *Climate* *Change* " www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/vapor_warming.html
"“This new data set shows that as surface temperature increases, so does atmospheric humidity,” Dessler said. “Dumping greenhouse gases into the atmosphere makes the atmosphere more humid. And since water vapor is itself a greenhouse gas, the increase in humidity amplifies the warming from carbon dioxide.""The increase in water circulation in atm is a SIDE Effect of increased CO2 levels. Water vapors not being able to properly condense in a proper amount of time if a problem that came about from increased localized CO2 levels.
Joe this year in Australia, mate we have a drought, bushfire, floods, coral bleaching in the great barrier reef, dust storms reaching out to east coast, we have frequently had continued day's in the 40 celesest
As a Houstonion I can confirm, ITS FUCKING HOT HERE. Idc what Arizona or New Mexico says is hot. You havent felt heat until youve felt Houston's heat and humidity
@BallTistic Screecher Yep. These Climate people are no different than the religious crazies that claim because these storms and wars etc.. are happening that it's the end times. Nothing but fear mongering to make a $, push their agendas and beliefs on others. In '93. A few days before the blizzard a tornado outbreak happened. I remember my parents being the southern Baptist they are kept saying the end times are near and whatnot. Well. Here we are. 26 years later and no Jesus. There have always been wars. There have always been bad storms and weather related tragedies. We live in the digital age now and as soon as something happens it's being videoed. So of course it seems a lot worse and more often. Most of the time before the internet or even smartphones you probably only heard if about a third of what was going on around the world. IF THAT!
@@rosco33ful because the guys who make knowing this stuff their lifes work understand why global cooling is not a major concern. its march, i have never seen snow last this long in my life living in the rainshadow of the cascades. almost all of our snow came in 2 months after new years. its been unbelievably cold for so long a huge diversity of bugs is not expected to recover until next year. but every damn summer we have been getting record heat waves that never happen because the sun gets blocked out by all the forest fires. these last two years literally looked like hell on earth where i lived. so whats with the super hot dry summers and the heavy winters happening at the same time? it sound like something is destabilizing the climate.
@@odisy64 Good point. I wonder how many lives, properties and trees we've saved by fighting fires with energy from fossil fuels (trucks, pumps, aircraft). Spruce and pine feed on carbon from the atmosphere, and they only regenerate in a forest fire, most of which are caused by lightning. But if warming is the concern, why should there be any record lows at all? Humidity and temps move around, sure, but earthquakes and tsunami's? We just had our coldest February in 40 years. How does that track with the carbon greenhouse narrative, and when has the climate ever been stable anyway? The Sahara wasn't always a desert and no amount of money or batteries can fix it. Meteorologists can barely forecast the next 3 days with any accuracy, never mind the next 3 or 30 years. This guy is only interested in the left-wing extremist's view. $100/ton would cost triple via the government and put 6 billion people back in the stone ages. I'm sure he'd be all for it.
I think Joe left a lot of his opinions out of this clip here. Honestly pretty confused about what he actually thinks about it all though. Especially after Randal, and the other conversations hes had since.
This is the problem I see with this talk of we will adapt and survive which I agree with, humans will find some way to live with the extreme climate, the problem is the grains/food and agriculture we rely on won't.. no chance or food supplies will be able to keep up with unpredictable weather and once the ability to grow food collapses then you will see the collapse of society
there is this thing called a greenhouse. if you really wanna know about the future of food production look at the netherlands. best agriculture in the world
Joe Rogan you should do a podcast with piers Corbyn who is a weather expert, astrophysist and meteorologist. About climate change you will be very interested on his views on climate change
I'm in New Orleans, there is NO denying climate change. The lakes & bays I fished as a kid are all open water now. We are losing our coast @ an increasingly alarming rate. It's sad to see.
You're in a place that's literally below sea level, so that's expected, isn't it? Sea levels aren't static. They're finding lost advanced civilizations from thousands of years ago along coastlines underwater all the time. Of course the climate changes but what do you expect things to Just always stay the same? I'm not a denier of human effects but it's not so black and white. You do know most of North America was covered by a mile of ice just 10 thousand years ago. That's a blink of an eye in the cosmic sense. The Sahara desert was lush 4500 years ago. Hence why the pyramids weren't actually built in a desert because it wasn't a desert then. That's quite the climate change there. What was that caused from, pyramid emissions?
As someone that lives in Houston, i can definitely feel the effect of climate change. last year i believe was the hottest summer we have ever had and it’s already feeling like that will be the same this year.
"Can technology save us? Can technology entertain us while the world is burning?" Interesting questions. I'm hoping it's the former but I know it's gonna be the latter. I don't have much confidence in our species pulling through on fixing this problem
@JohnFruscianteMarkLa Why do wind and solar suck? And yes, you'd think that government would do a lot to prevent something like this but the ones in power don't believe it
@@jimbalta Astrophysicists make testable predictions that have been shown to be accurate in regards to the motion of the planets. Relying on a climate scientist to make a prediction is akin to going to an astrologer to determine the motion of celestial bodies, except the astrologer would probably have a higher success rate.
Science has never claimed to be about facts. Science studies what has happened and what is likely to happen based on a multitude of research. I hope that makes it clearer for you
Have you read that entire BBC article, Steve Spam? The climate models predict that the Arctic ice sheet will melt away during summers at some point between 2040 and 2100, with one scientist speculating that it COULD happen as soon as 2013. So we're still 20 to 80 years from witnessing the real-world test of the models.
I broke the dam... I ran a boat into the dam and I broke it. On a boat that wasn't mine. I kept it secret for two days. The boat caught on fire, and it exploded!
Lol Joe wouldn't talk to any skeptics that know more about it then him. He'll only bring on people like Candace Owens who knows as much as he does. But from the other side.
I bet Judith Curry would be willing to share what she knows but she won't be invited on a platform with this much reach that belongs to the lefty oligarchs.
JOE i understand this individual is a journalist. It would preferential to to back up his broad statements by citing scientific studies.This is the method that many guest use and does add credence to their statements. I am surprised you did not probe deeper and solicit precise data from him. Great show stay on the ball JOE.
Can we just have a benefit of the doubt with climate change please? If it's not real we loose nothing, if it's real we're fucked. So please just start supporting sustainable energy. Thank you
From a NASA article. "reforesting an area the size of the United States and Canada combined (1 to 2 billion hectares) could take between one and two thousand years, assuming we plant a million hectares a year and that each hectare contains at least 50 to 100 trees to create an appropriate treetop canopy cover.” Even once the trees are planted, says Saatchi, it will take them about a century to reach maturity."
Just for the record: We would like to stop using fossil fuels but it's too hard. Sorry kids. You better get busy figuring this out. Good luck with that.
Gloabl warming means a rise in the average temperature around the earth. It does not mean that it's going to get warmer everywhere. Some places are actually going to get colder. Overall, the weather is getting more extreme.
Joe Rogan addressing an issue of importance that very few in the larger media and government refuse to talk about at length. We will literally be cooked in places.
Your just saying its a hoax. There is scientific evidence saying the contrary. Who do you think belives you beside yourself. Wake up. The exemption and lack of action on this is due to the face that the population is already out of control and there is no money to be made in saving the earth, they only want to hang onto the current paths of destruction. Greed and money @BallTistic Screecher
You sound like a fundamentalist Christian Curtis. You have about as much evidence as they do, but carry on with your anti-scientific nonsense. I'll stick with an MIT atmospheric physicist who think your beliefs are akin to a cult.
@BallTistic Screecher Uh, no, It has already Raised some, Where have you been? Do you stay in the dark on purpose or can you not turn off Fox News long enough to observe your surroundings? Ignorance is a choice.
@BallTistic Screecher 2 Degrees Celsius (3.6 F) of a global temperature rise Will be Catastrophic for humans on the planet. According to an ongoing temperature analysis conducted by scientists at NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), the average global temperature on Earth has increased by about 0.8° Celsius (1.4° Fahrenheit) since 1880. And it continues to speed up. Its the Rate of the increase which is the problem, yes the earth cools and warms over millions on years, but never at this rate. (I get my news from many sources, including fox news because if you don't understand the other sides argument then your opinion is not to be respected.
Let's suppose that climate change won't happen. What are we losing by being cautious of the proposed life changing carbon footprint we exude, and trim it back. Still creates a bunch of jobs that are severely needed. Win win.
Right?! Regardless of whether or not people believe we are making climate change worse, we do know the impacts of various kinds of pollution on the human body. We might as well live cleaner and more efficiently.
Agreed, its impossible to tell with certainty at this point if we are causing it or not since we have only 150 years of data (which is literally nothing) but we do know it is happening. And because of that we should continue investing in new technologies to help against that in some ways. Hopefully by investing we can make it profitable for producers and affordable for consumers. Either way it hopefully creates job, helps economy, and help environment even if its not our fault. However, all this should not be force by government with taxes and legislation. This can only be done if it helps the economy and government trying to force something that consumers may not want is a sure way to destroy it
Transitioning away from non-renewable resources and so-called dirty energy would be like the next industrial revolution for the United States. It would dwarf the amount of jobs created by WW2.
If the oceans become too acidic and essentially die, the land based food chain will collapse. That's us, that's everybody.
@@PoeV2 It'll come to that. People will be feasting on corpses after the collapse.
PoeV2 your facetiousness is stupid cuz I know you’re likely far right wing but this is funny so I’ll give it a pass
@@PoeV2 idk about you but I'll prepare for the worst
Fungus will be fine but that's about it.
Nothing wrong of dying I'ma do that
This guys voice makes me need water.
I was just thinking the same thing....is that what they refer to as vocal fry?
@@mikemathieson3700 Male vocal fry, one of a kind
The warming made his throat dry
He must have had allergies or just got better from a cold or something, his voice sounds dry but also like he may have mucus build up in his throat.
“the earth will be fine, it’s humans that are fucked” - George Carlin
Lots of species will go extinct alongside us. But ultimately, nature as a whole will reborn. I've seen simulations and read some work about how much carbon dioxide is going to be left. And one scientists finds that even after/if emissions end, there's going to be 25% of that human made CO2 circulating for few millennia after it is finally phased out by natural processes. So it is crazy because it means this shit lasts more than radioactive waste does. It all compares to Earth being that big organism undergoing chemiotherapy to get rid of those parasites that invaded it. But if we fuck up things too much and make this planet unlivable- no crops, no food, hardly breathable air then WE WILL be gone. With all our technological might we are too weak: not asvanced enough to sustain ourselves in space in some spacecraft, we don't have any habitable planet in the vicinity, no technology to make any planet habitable and no space faring technology to take us farther away in space to find anything habitable. So to sum up- if we screw it here, qe are screwed. And what pains me the most is that it really all comes dowb to fossil fuels and oil companies that are majority if the 100 companies that commit to over 50% emissions. Few oil giants holding senators and politicians by their balls, concerned only for quick buck and literally stealing our children's futurecaway from us. And majority of people sit on their asses while we should be out on the streets DEMANDING for these fat, fed and rich to the extreme old prick mother fuckers to cease their shit, contribute to transformation. They take trillions in subsidies and earn more trillions themselves not fucking counting the shit they keep on theur private accounts- they should be fucking financing all the renewable energy shift and electric car industry. And in turn, they sit ever more fat and content and are withholding all changes. I tell you- if nothing changes, in few decades from now, people are going to tear them apart
@@MarymonckiJohn based and redpilled. Nonetheless, the more the earth hurts, the worse humans get because with a loss of biodiversity brings an increase of CO2, heat, erosion, and disease.
Humans are going to die, and thats enough of a reason to fight climate change
So true. This is the worst Joe Rogan podcast I’ve ever seen. A journalist from New York. Of course he’s an alarmist. The weather has always been changing… lookup the “Younger Dryas,” where The climate temperature changed 18°F in under a decade. We will adapt. Lmao, this dude is a professional alarmist, government propaganda agent.
I love climate and anti science people using George as their spokesman. However they missed the key point he said which is “the earth will be fine, it’s humans that are fucked”. To stop climate change is not to save the earth, the earth will be fine. Its to stop us from going back to the stone age.
12 years left? Shit...just in time to play and finish Red Dead 3
@Cyborg Jester you're a dumb dumb
@Cyborg Jester I'm not a leftist I'm just a person who likes making fun of clowns. Ya clown
@Cyborg Jester Jesus Christ 💀 You are crazy man. You have real hatred inside lmao I never said any of these things and don't care about them.
don't remind me bro...i havent even played RD2 yet !
Kristopher Ryan missing out man. It’s got a lot of flaws but it grows on u
“The climate is fake” - Eddie Bravo
You troll get outta of here
That seems like a snippet that misrepresents someone's actual opinion.
@@slamrock17 If u don´t know who Eddie bravo is, he believes a lot of conspiracy theories like the earth is flat and other stuff like that so i don´t believe that snippet is misrepresentive.
Do you know that Eddie Bravo doesn't exist.
@@suprememuppetkermit9944 I am playing devils advocate. You say you don't believe that is misrepresentative but you don't know for sure. That is the point. Truth is not the same as confirmation bias. He may believe the earth is not round but your oversimplification of his ideology is disconcerting. Let people disagree with his ideas not false ideas thrown out there.
Earth will continue. We will not. The end.
U just convinced me
Nature always wins, there's probably aliens that have been watching us since the beginning and there probably making bedts on how where going to all die.
we will continue too, climate change is not a threat to humankind, it is a threat to huge population numbers. Not to minimize how drastic the effects of climate change are going to be, but that is an important distinction people need to see. many people may die, humankind could survive MUCH worse than the effects of global warming even if ALL of the inorganic carbon on earth was released into the atmosphere.
until the sun eats it.
cant wait
"If we can build over the next decade or two build Global plantations of these carbon capture machines we could actually stop the problem or reverse it a bit."
You mean sortof like trees?
Futurecare Design trees are actually not that effective at capture unless genetically enhanced. It’s not that simple.
@@DaManBearPig actually they are as the earth is greener than it has ever been in human history. thats a fact. co2 is plant food. its actually better for plant life .
@@NocturnalIntuition the earth is in no way shape or form greener as it has ever been. We are loosing 10 billion trees a year. And CO2 is not just fuel for plants, if the concentration of it is too high plants die out. Just like sunlight, when they get too much sun a day the leaves start to die.
@@NocturnalIntuition moreover with increase plant groath comes increased water consumption. Making areas with an unseartain water supply even more prwwn to drouths. Areas like south Afrika or India.
@@elmihox6969 i think its cute that you thought i just picked my comment out of the air. however if you look it up you would see that theres plenty to back up what i said. even nasa (the guys in space who look down on our planet and report back what they see) say the earth has been significantly gettting greener over the past 2 decades
"The planet is fine. The people are fucked" - George Carlin, 1992.
fermi paradox, we probably never found aliens yet cause the great filter could be overcoming climate change which means we might not have much time left
Thats exactly what I was thinking about a couple of days ago. If I had to pinpoint a filter for the fermi paradox its either the evolution of big brains and a body thats able to make tools or this.
So should we plug every Volcano b/c over the past 12 months volcanoes around the world have pumped more carbon and contaminants into the atmosphere than North America has since the industrial age began.
It's an interesting point. Too little fossil fuels a society might never develops past a certain point. Too much fossil fuels and they cook themselves.
However, there's a morbid caveat here. Even if climate change kills billions of humans. The loss of billions of humans in a century on a scale of the Fermi paradox is nothing, if we bounce back without the explosive energy potential
Are bots leaving these negative comments and clicking thumbs down? It's like the same generic negative comments over and over again.
Neocons discovered the internet kinda late. They're still getting the hang of it.
No they aren’t. A lot of them are probably people like me, who actually live in these places and see how incorrect his narrative is, or have live long enough to see how incorrect all the narrstives have been for the last 40 years and are skeptical.
They're not bots, they're all just as stupid as each other.
India and China worry me the most as they have giant populations with ridiculously large cities many of which are near the coast. Where will all these people go? Also, the majority of China's potable water comes from the south. These areas will become more prone to flooding as time goes on...so...where will their safe drinking water come from? One of the main sources of water for India is glacial melt...hard to get any more water once those glaciers are gone. That whole region of the world will be properly fooked.
Dont forget Mexico and south America large immigrant we might have to start building cities underground in extreme areas
Indian here you are absolutely right, recently a glacier melted here, and even groundwater is being exploited. Grim days
China is still rich and technologically aware and all.. We need to plan ourselves more cautiously and meticulously , ..saying as an Indian myself
it amazes me that the right wing anti imigration lot are also climate change denialists who will see a massive influx greater than ever before when this hits home at least a billion people are likely to become homeless because oof climate change im 61 have no kids and am happy about my siruation
The last 2 mins are among the most powerful non fiction video seen I've seen. Only critique: I think David doesn't quite grasp how interdependent and fragile our financial and economic systems are. Climate chaos will bring multiple Black Swan events that will wreak havoc on the global economic systems. 2008 was a rainy day for the economy compared to the financial monsoon that will hit us. I seriously doubt that anyone except the top 1% will be financially "alright".
No one will be alight. Inflation can destroy money within months.
@@ivandobrev2240 Solid point. I think they know that and will be converting as much funny money into hard assets as they can. And also, you're right, they still won't be "alright"...unless they and their descendants consider living in an underground silo "alright".
I think he gets it. It would be very hard for him not to after so much research. But what are we going to do? Nihilism really isn't my thing, and when it comes to climate matters, it's hard to find any middle ground between denialists and nihilists, and this is going back quite a ways, long before we were this fucked, so I think it's an easy psychological coping mechanism to be one or the other.
@@squamish4244 You're probably right, nihilism may be a coping mechanism for confronting such a "big" problem that's outside our individual control. At the same time, however, our civilization being "doomed" may also be true. Much like the old joke, "Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't watching you." The long established trend certainly points in that direction. But you know valar, even if we are, we still have to pay our bills everyday, want to see our friends and family, and basically life goes on. Until it doesn't.
@@terryhasan The problem with nihilism is it is a self-fulfilling prophecy. I don't like to see a lot of people retreat into nihilism just as world government are finally coming around to face this enormous task. And we don't know what sort of technologies lie on the horizon that could help get us out of this mess. We know some that could do it now. Carbon capture and sequestration would cost between $3-$5 trillion a year to bring CO2 levels down to...wherever we want. That used to seem like a huge number until 2020.
The world initially responded terribly to Covid, but then it moved with incredible speed. In a stunning 8 months vaccines were produced. Many countries did successfully impose lockdowns that saved countless lives. The man-children running the world at the time did the worst. (More women in power, now!)
My frustration is that on many climate videos where people DO take the science seriously, the comment sections are loaded with nihilists. If you even try to talk about solutions they don't want to hear it. I've been involve in renewable energy by way of my dad's career for 30 years, and if anyone should be a nihilist it it him, but he's not. It does a grave disservice to all the people who have fought so hard to make this planet better to just go "awww fuck it" if you've done nothing yourself.
And you're right. You have to act as if your children and future grandchildren in my case have a future...or even yourself, if you've still got 50-60 years left (or more - who knows where gerontology research is headed). You just can't go to the hopeless place.
I love that everyone gets upset about the virtual world of Twitter, and don't care, or believe in real world climate change and pollution.
People really believe nothing wrong with the environment
My Name Is Alphabet. You lack the brain to talk about this subject, stop.
@Andy Z Human activity does effect the climate but we really don't know to what degree. It could be neglible. Ice core samples show the Earth used to have even more carbon than it does now and went through much warmer periods. So what conclusions can you draw? The 97% consensus is a myth. What else you got?
@BallTistic Screecher It's a positive feedback loop... Furthermore, more CO2 is not necessarily good for plants.
@@Unriven I have this weird feeling you know exactly nothing about climate science, and your knowledge is limited to regurgitating slogans and shaming skeptics with insults.
People living off the grid away from cities, growing there own food are taking the right steps. Planet 🌏 is going to look like the Book of Eli
Just thought about mad max after I posted this comment. Hope I’m in the next life before those days come.
@Robert Curtin why?
People living off the grid will fare no better than city dwellers cause when the millions of people in cities are forced to move they will inundate the off grid people like a huge wave,no one will be spared.
@@jamesadams893 why do u think most smart off gridders are armed to the teeth lol
@@countdooku75 some people can't arm themselves.
Lots of interesting comments from guys who have studied climate change and have looked at all the facts
BBAOmega *guest gets one fact wrong*
“OH MY GOD HES A FRAUD HES A SHILL THATS ENOUGH TO DISCREDIT HIM REEEEEEE”
@@SliceofBread123 Well, I'm not sure he is a fraud but he certainly doesnt offer any real evidence to back his hell on earth claims. I was actually thinking, he is a writer, he gets paid to bring in audiences in order to make money, the darker the story and the more end of times illustrations the bigger the audience and the more money his company makes. So to him I would say, nice story bro.
I also find it funny how many times scientist and climate predictors have predicted the end of the world as we know it and either are completely incorrect (Al Gore, who made millions with his end of the world predictions) or keep pushing the destruction of mankind via climate change further and further into the future.
The only ones going RRREEEEE are the leftist globalist who love to fear monger by pushing the climate change holocaust meanwhile making billions in profit and raising taxes to furtheRRREEEEE claiming this will solve all our climate problems meanwhile causing more RRREEEE because the earth is going to end in 12 years if we dont. The only ones going RRREEEE is the left and their NPC followers.
The Fundamental Elements of Free Speech But haven't the shitty weather phenomenona been increasing in both frequency and severity recently? Like heatwaves, wildfires and hurricanes? And even if something that they predicted was going to happen didn't happen the way or at the time they described it would, it still doesn't mean it isn't going on or not going to happen.
regardless if climate change is man made or not sea levels will still rise and the climate will be different so when you argue this you completely avoid the point that humanity will be affected.
Thats the problem, they are false facts.
Jesus Christ the vocal fry on this guy is unbearable
Ok so like dude wow climate change ok like so 30 years of co2 ok like so you know dude wow i am terrified of the world in like 12 years dude wow.
I agree. He sounds like the male version of a female that talks like this "Like oh my god, like you know right? like oh my god."
I know... like that Ford woman in the Kavanah case.... I call it the believe me victim voice
Was looking for this comment
i know.. sounds like a burn out surfer dude.
you sent me down the rabbit hole czcams.com/video/R6r7LhcHHAc/video.html
dude its all good if the earth is flat we can just drill a hole in the ice wall and keep the water level down.
Y'all need to listen instead of going straight to denying everything.
@BallTistic Screecher You can't call science bullshit just because it doesn't agree with your political party who relies on oil and coal companies.
So you'll listen to the climate skeptics arguments before denying them and falsely labeling them science "deniers"?
@BallTistic Screecher It's simple, CO2 is a green house gas, green house gases trap heatin the atmosphere, which raises the temperature of the earth, if this change happens faster than the ecosystem can adapt to it there will be catastrophy as many species like bees will die. Let's try to reduce the CO2 we produce. Can it be any simpler than that? The only problem is that eould impede the sales of oil and coal as they produce a lot of CO2, and they lobby to shut climate change scientists up. Where is the bullshit exactly?
@BallTistic Screecher absolutely. Im a millennial and I used to believe in their propaganda till I decided to research it for myself. I looked into what climate scientist in the skeptic community had to say and read some of the peer reviewed papers from alarmist...
They contradict themselves in peer reviewed papers... so I can't help but wonder who is reviewing them.
@BallTistic Screecher That's not what scientists say, that's just what you've heard from a right wing activist or politician, which just happens to serve their agenda. It would be better to try and prevent any kind of catastrophe if we can instead of saying oh whatever guess we'll just die.
I like how the thumbnail has a picture of cooling towers. That gas you see coming out of them? Steam. Water in the vapor phase. Oh dear!!! Not steam!!!!
Jamie isn’t that bright
Jamie has an A in physics, not chemistry
But it's a big industrial building with smokey smoke coming out of the chimney. It has to be bad
Water vapor is actually a greenhouse gas under the right conditions
But it also affects albedo
@@propergander8509 you think theses idiots know what albedo means?
This guy's book is a Science Non-Fiction Horror.
Greed. All of this is a product of greed.
I bet the dinosaurs would agree.
You are naive
Greed, and ignorance.
lot of climate experts in the comments section
What is that supposed to mean?
@@SteveSmith-fh6br ignorance must be bliss
@@vincentjamesderamo5940 I don't know, how's it working out for you? Watch any good CNN or Fox lately? LOL
@@SteveSmith-fh6br A few were off, most were right though. Most predictions by a large number of scientists have come true for the most part. Most models have been fairly accurate as well. I'll trust an entire field of science over bloggers that have a GED.
Random dumb fuck posts random Wordpress site links explaining how there's no fucking experts on climate science which is like presenting no evidence at all in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Why the fuck are you appealing to the authority of a painfully fucking random and 100% obvious propaganda website to peddle your asinine bullshit?
all i took away from this video is that its time to invest in some renewable energy stocks for the long run
then you completely missed the point
yes please do that. spend your money on it, please.
Global warming has gotten so bad that there’s sky lasers burning up houses.
Paradise... what a sad turn of events.
I want go live there, but man...
Sky lasers...lol
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directed-energy_weapon
We just finished going through the coldest months on record. What the hell is he talking about.
I feel like I'm watching bill and Ted's excellent adventure
The Oldsmobile Delta 88 is a fine automobile.
I can agree with this. The old engine always a nice tone. We should bring it back screw the climate.
Here's a question if you're concerned about CO2. Are you in favor of increasing Nuclear to replace Fossil Fuel ennergy?
Nuclear is the only alternative to replace CO2 at a large scale. Wind/Solar can replace some but has limitations.
I agree, it is a very logical way forward
100% in support of using nuclear energy to replace fossil fuel energy. We should have done that by now.
If money is not a thing, then nuclear full throttle, unfortunately...
@@xyc350 its not a money problem, oil mafia lobbies hard against it, cause they'll lose billions if mass scale nuclear energy becomes a thing...
Just a thought but it would be more effective if we could miniaturize the CO2 scrubbers and install them in cars.
Aaaah a fellow clarksonian, please have this good sir: czcams.com/video/nz-Q-4RUd28/video.html
Perhaps, but consider how many cars there already are. Even if you put scrubbers in every car, the amount of GhG exhaust they still put out won’t be offset by the scrubbers.
What we blame capitalism for ? ....this guy. Props for Joe for letting him talk.
David Wallace?....wasn't he the former CFO of Dunder Mifflin?
Suck it!
High school geography got me so worked up on global warming, so much so that im surprised im not a nihilist.
Talks about long term effects of climate change, thumbnail: Steam from a nuclear reactor.
contributing factors fool. Even though its not....lol...arguably
Just a heads up, SpecTech, water vapor "Steam"" retains much more heat than CO2.Heat retention = climate change. Don't believe me take a chemistry class. Just trying to help a brother out. The more you know :)
P.S. Do I care about Climate change? No
Steam can easily condense back into water and turn into rain. CO2 or Carbon monoxide does not readily condense under normal atm and heat conditions. CO2 is actually worse because of this because it doesn't transfer heat as well as h20 nor does it condense into a heavier form of matter well. Fact is, it's the combination of both elements being displaced from their local habitat that is making the biggest impact on living species. Moving Carbon into the air creates localized heat zones then that turns water into to steam>clouds/storms> which moves to a new location thanks to aerodynamics and condenses and falls where it wasn't originally. Thus the age old complaint of melted glaciers. The ice caps melting within itself isn't the problem, its the relocation of mass amounts of water and its oceanic rise relative to the atmosphere which allows the water to vaporize much quicker and cause more storms.
@@Themayseffect I agree with the words you have typed but I was specifically talking about the *steam* in the thumbnail, but water vapor can't just be written off. NASA can explain it better then I can " *"Water* *Vapor* *Confirmed* *as* *Major Player* *in* *Climate* *Change* "
www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/vapor_warming.html
"“This new data set shows that as surface temperature increases, so does
atmospheric humidity,” Dessler said. “Dumping greenhouse gases into the
atmosphere makes the atmosphere more humid. And since water vapor is itself a
greenhouse gas, the increase in humidity amplifies the warming from carbon
dioxide.""The increase in water circulation in atm is a SIDE Effect of increased CO2 levels. Water vapors not being able to properly condense in a proper amount of time if a problem that came about from increased localized CO2 levels.
Yuval Noah Harari would be a great guest.
Please please!
Yes yes would love discussion on human evolution
Six simultaneous natural disasters at the same time? Floods, Dementor's, Shark Nado's, no internets... um... malaria... crew clothing going bust!
Dementors 😂😂😂
Joe this year in Australia, mate we have a drought, bushfire, floods, coral bleaching in the great barrier reef, dust storms reaching out to east coast, we have frequently had continued day's in the 40 celesest
Australia having 40 degree days is nothing new or special.
As a Houstonion I can confirm, ITS FUCKING HOT HERE. Idc what Arizona or New Mexico says is hot. You havent felt heat until youve felt Houston's heat and humidity
As a North Texan, I always dreaded visiting my in laws in Houston. You guys get the worst summers I’ve ever experienced.
I don’t know it gets into the 120’s in Phoenix but it’s a dry heat.
Ryan Reynolds knows a lot about science lol
I'm in GA and we had freeze warning in March....March!
Umm. I have lived in GA all my life and that is absolutely nothing new. Blizzard of '93. Ever heard of it?
When and where in GA? I’m also in GA
Atlanta area.
@BallTistic Screecher Agreed. That was my point
@BallTistic Screecher Yep. These Climate people are no different than the religious crazies that claim because these storms and wars etc.. are happening that it's the end times. Nothing but fear mongering to make a $, push their agendas and beliefs on others.
In '93. A few days before the blizzard a tornado outbreak happened. I remember my parents being the southern Baptist they are kept saying the end times are near and whatnot. Well. Here we are. 26 years later and no Jesus. There have always been wars. There have always been bad storms and weather related tragedies. We live in the digital age now and as soon as something happens it's being videoed. So of course it seems a lot worse and more often. Most of the time before the internet or even smartphones you probably only heard if about a third of what was going on around the world. IF THAT!
He forgot to mention the fires in my state in Australia that have been burning since before Christmas.
Just checked, 3 new record lows were set in 2018 for Calgary. Lowest monthly temps this year were the same as 2010's.
you should also check for record highs....
@@odisy64 You missed the point. There's records on both sides but you don't see anyone making a case for global cooling.
@@rosco33ful because the guys who make knowing this stuff their lifes work understand why global cooling is not a major concern. its march, i have never seen snow last this long in my life living in the rainshadow of the cascades. almost all of our snow came in 2 months after new years. its been unbelievably cold for so long a huge diversity of bugs is not expected to recover until next year.
but every damn summer we have been getting record heat waves that never happen because the sun gets blocked out by all the forest fires. these last two years literally looked like hell on earth where i lived.
so whats with the super hot dry summers and the heavy winters happening at the same time? it sound like something is destabilizing the climate.
@@odisy64 Good point. I wonder how many lives, properties and trees we've saved by fighting fires with energy from fossil fuels (trucks, pumps, aircraft). Spruce and pine feed on carbon from the atmosphere, and they only regenerate in a forest fire, most of which are caused by lightning. But if warming is the concern, why should there be any record lows at all? Humidity and temps move around, sure, but earthquakes and tsunami's? We just had our coldest February in 40 years. How does that track with the carbon greenhouse narrative, and when has the climate ever been stable anyway? The Sahara wasn't always a desert and no amount of money or batteries can fix it. Meteorologists can barely forecast the next 3 days with any accuracy, never mind the next 3 or 30 years. This guy is only interested in the left-wing extremist's view. $100/ton would cost triple via the government and put 6 billion people back in the stone ages. I'm sure he'd be all for it.
Coldest winter and temperatures ever recorded in Antarctica in 2021
This guy never heard about feedback loops.. Just decided it ain't that easy...
Even loops have a limit
joe i already forgot what randal showed me rogan..
I think Joe left a lot of his opinions out of this clip here. Honestly pretty confused about what he actually thinks about it all though. Especially after Randal, and the other conversations hes had since.
Unfortunately, DWW failed to address global dimming - aka; the aerosol masking affect.
How many papers on climate change could Peter Boghossian & James Lindsay get published and have David Wallace put in his next book.
This is the problem I see with this talk of we will adapt and survive which I agree with, humans will find some way to live with the extreme climate, the problem is the grains/food and agriculture we rely on won't.. no chance or food supplies will be able to keep up with unpredictable weather and once the ability to grow food collapses then you will see the collapse of society
there is this thing called a greenhouse. if you really wanna know about the future of food production look at the netherlands. best agriculture in the world
Pushing Mr. Mad Scientist of Geoengineering a.k.a. David Keith to the rescue, once again. That's just bonkers.
It rained inside my house today. I wish I was kidding.
Ipcc says we need to drastically reduce our emissions by the end of THIS year or we will be too far gone. I haven't seen any press for that tho
Joe 'I've talked to people' Rogan
by 2020 the earth will cut a fart so smelly we wont be able to smell good air again until 2022
Joe Rogan you should do a podcast with piers Corbyn who is a weather expert, astrophysist and meteorologist. About climate change you will be very interested on his views on climate change
Why are they showing water vapor from nuclear plants on the title page
I'm in New Orleans, there is NO denying climate change. The lakes & bays I fished as a kid are all open water now. We are losing our coast @ an increasingly alarming rate. It's sad to see.
Which lakes and bays you fished as a kid in the New Orleans area are now "open water"?
New Orleans is sub sea level and always has been. It’s the absolute dumbest place to build a city in the United States.
You're in a place that's literally below sea level, so that's expected, isn't it? Sea levels aren't static. They're finding lost advanced civilizations from thousands of years ago along coastlines underwater all the time. Of course the climate changes but what do you expect things to Just always stay the same? I'm not a denier of human effects but it's not so black and white. You do know most of North America was covered by a mile of ice just 10 thousand years ago. That's a blink of an eye in the cosmic sense. The Sahara desert was lush 4500 years ago. Hence why the pyramids weren't actually built in a desert because it wasn't a desert then. That's quite the climate change there. What was that caused from, pyramid emissions?
Yea and you're also below sea Level and they're using weather and climate engineering, Katerina being one of the biggies,
what could go wrong.
I was expecting him to say that we need to outlaw cow farts but he didn't go there
Grass fed beef instead of grain feed beef would cut down on that considerably....
@@espada9 all we have to blame is ourselves and the people who've put themselves in power
Boss Sauce what about the 500 billion farts people make every year?
@@Ms.Fowlbwahhh cows are only the first step. The state will give out farting licenses to everyone who gets on board with their agenda
If we didn't allow women to speak it could help
As someone that lives in Houston, i can definitely feel the effect of climate change. last year i believe was the hottest summer we have ever had and it’s already feeling like that will be the same this year.
Why was this episode deleted off joes channel
"Can technology save us? Can technology entertain us while the world is burning?" Interesting questions. I'm hoping it's the former but I know it's gonna be the latter. I don't have much confidence in our species pulling through on fixing this problem
@Human Resources Cool
@JohnFruscianteMarkLa Why do wind and solar suck? And yes, you'd think that government would do a lot to prevent something like this but the ones in power don't believe it
Save us from what Alec.
How can you call it science if you constantly refer to predictions 100+ years into the future as facts?
Not to mention every prediction they have made so far has been wildly wrong. This has been going on since the 1930's.
news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7139797.stm
The same reason the motion of celestial body's is considered a science lol.
@@jimbalta Astrophysicists make testable predictions that have been shown to be accurate in regards to the motion of the planets. Relying on a climate scientist to make a prediction is akin to going to an astrologer to determine the motion of celestial bodies, except the astrologer would probably have a higher success rate.
Science has never claimed to be about facts. Science studies what has happened and what is likely to happen based on a multitude of research. I hope that makes it clearer for you
Have you read that entire BBC article, Steve Spam? The climate models predict that the Arctic ice sheet will melt away during summers at some point between 2040 and 2100, with one scientist speculating that it COULD happen as soon as 2013. So we're still 20 to 80 years from witnessing the real-world test of the models.
You should have the guy from the Suspicious Observers youtube channel on.
Important journalism that is well represented by your guest and you. Very nicely done and please repeat until more listen
You are convinced by a superstition, not authentic science and actual data.
Just a young dude trying to write a scary story for attention.
@@massatube That "Scary Story" is backed by 99% of scientists all across the world...
How credible is this journalist
5:05
@@jordanbaker1991 He reads obscure subreddits bro
Why so many dislikes? Worried about their narrow-minded bubble and kardashians? Haha.
I broke the dam... I ran a boat into the dam and I broke it.
On a boat that wasn't mine.
I kept it secret for two days.
The boat caught on fire, and it exploded!
No, I broke the dam.
It was man bear pig.
Like how you dont have a dirty windfarm throwing oil and drying the land out around it!
Get Tony Heller on this show
Lol Joe wouldn't talk to any skeptics that know more about it then him.
He'll only bring on people like Candace Owens who knows as much as he does. But from the other side.
I bet Judith Curry would be willing to share what she knows but she won't be invited on a platform with this much reach that belongs to the lefty oligarchs.
New Record heat every year
JOE i understand this individual is a journalist. It would preferential to to back up his broad statements by citing scientific studies.This is the method that many guest use and does add credence to their statements. I am surprised you did not probe deeper and solicit precise data from him. Great show stay on the ball JOE.
He is quoting his book which quotes all the scientific papers.
It's called The Uninhabitable Earth.
Thanks for spreading this info
If this was Alex Jones, Jamie would have been fact checking all of this. 😂😂😂
...because what Alex Jones says contradicts the scientific research.
@@ScorpionXIISo Alex Jones was incorrect about Jeffrey Epstein? 9/11? Many other stories that were covered up?
There is certainly a Pascal's wager argument for climate change against those who infer the whole theory as an anti west conspiracy.hahah
So 3 trillion to fix climate.....so do it. Everyone puts in a few bucks.
David: There's a guy at Harvard named David Keith
Joe: The guy from Major League II???
This guy browse r/collapse for sure
He’s not wrong though
That dude predicts all this chaos and we can't even get the weather predictions right for tomorrow....
Dude read a book
Difference weather and climate. Its easier to predict the average temp of the year 2030 than next weeks weathet
30 years is all we need to figure out nuclear fusion
Can we just have a benefit of the doubt with climate change please? If it's not real we loose nothing, if it's real we're fucked. So please just start supporting sustainable energy. Thank you
Dawg let’s just plant trees
Are the climate models as accurate as the Covid models?
I bet those models aren't as hot! (Badamp chhh)
They should do show about what happens after 2 degrees happens if we failed....
Give this man a glass of water
You need to have Geoff Lawton on. We can sequester a shit ton of carbon from just reforestation and sustainable agriculture.
James Gant ya and trees are the best carbon capture devices + they give us oxygen and make our air cleaner
No money to be made by rent seekers by improving the soil
From a NASA article. "reforesting an area the size of the United States and Canada combined (1 to 2 billion hectares) could take between one and two thousand years, assuming we plant a million hectares a year and that each hectare contains at least 50 to 100 trees to create an appropriate treetop canopy cover.”
Even once the trees are planted, says Saatchi, it will take them about a century to reach maturity."
0:48 bullshit. I live in kolkata(Calcutta) . It is not what you make of it
It is true
A new meaning for depressing
Just for the record: We would like to stop using fossil fuels but it's too hard. Sorry kids. You better get busy figuring this out. Good luck with that.
This guys vocal fry is almost unbearable
same with the upspeak, aka valley girl voice
But what makes it worse is that he talks total BULLSHIT
Just watch this ( nice sum up of facts ).
czcams.com/video/btU1pJI1F8w/video.html
CZcams comment sections are filled with non-scientists who think they know more than scientists. You people are hilarious.
Tbf this dude is on and he's not a scientist, but he's acting like one.
Thank you David Wallace wells
Why is it getting colder where I live?
Gloabl warming means a rise in the average temperature around the earth. It does not mean that it's going to get warmer everywhere. Some places are actually going to get colder. Overall, the weather is getting more extreme.
As the average temperature of the Earth goes up, the hot air pushes the cold air out from the poles and it comes down further south and dissipates.
The problem lies right within the comment section......Not taking this serious, and joking about nothing. Fools.
@JohnFruscianteMarkLa You're assuming everyone will act perfectly rationally.
Humans play such a minimal role in climate change, its gonna change with or without us.
Some crazy weather
2 °c that is distributed mostly in the oceans and at the poles isn't going to do much to a desert at the equator
Al Gore ain't so crazy after all. 🤔
@Matthew Alkman savage! 🤣
Rare Scence. So true. It has turned hip to talk shit about Al Gore, but he was always right. To hell with the stupid nay sayers.
Al Gore was very hyperbolic, but the core of what he was saying was generally true.
Yes he is!
Joe Rogan addressing an issue of importance that very few in the larger media and government refuse to talk about at length. We will literally be cooked in places.
Have you heard of methane hydrate?
@@Pistolita221 It's in the ocean.
Fixable for less than the present subsidies to fossil fuels??!!!?
WTF!!
This is like the prequel to mad max
What really sucks, is the only time deniers will be convinced, is when it is already too late.
Your just saying its a hoax. There is scientific evidence saying the contrary. Who do you think belives you beside yourself. Wake up. The exemption and lack of action on this is due to the face that the population is already out of control and there is no money to be made in saving the earth, they only want to hang onto the current paths of destruction. Greed and money @BallTistic Screecher
You sound like a fundamentalist Christian Curtis. You have about as much evidence as they do, but carry on with your anti-scientific nonsense. I'll stick with an MIT atmospheric physicist who think your beliefs are akin to a cult.
@BallTistic Screecher You're going to hold that belief to your grave arn't you?
@BallTistic Screecher Uh, no, It has already Raised some, Where have you been? Do you stay in the dark on purpose or can you not turn off Fox News long enough to observe your surroundings? Ignorance is a choice.
@BallTistic Screecher 2 Degrees Celsius (3.6 F) of a global temperature rise Will be Catastrophic for humans on the planet. According to an ongoing temperature analysis conducted by scientists at NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), the average global temperature on Earth has increased by about 0.8° Celsius (1.4° Fahrenheit) since 1880. And it continues to speed up. Its the Rate of the increase which is the problem, yes the earth cools and warms over millions on years, but never at this rate. (I get my news from many sources, including fox news because if you don't understand the other sides argument then your opinion is not to be respected.
Let's suppose that climate change won't happen. What are we losing by being cautious of the proposed life changing carbon footprint we exude, and trim it back. Still creates a bunch of jobs that are severely needed. Win win.
Right?! Regardless of whether or not people believe we are making climate change worse, we do know the impacts of various kinds of pollution on the human body. We might as well live cleaner and more efficiently.
Agreed, its impossible to tell with certainty at this point if we are causing it or not since we have only 150 years of data (which is literally nothing) but we do know it is happening. And because of that we should continue investing in new technologies to help against that in some ways. Hopefully by investing we can make it profitable for producers and affordable for consumers. Either way it hopefully creates job, helps economy, and help environment even if its not our fault. However, all this should not be force by government with taxes and legislation. This can only be done if it helps the economy and government trying to force something that consumers may not want is a sure way to destroy it
it also makes it so we dont have to buy oil from other countries or destroy our land by drilling for any.
Transitioning away from non-renewable resources and so-called dirty energy would be like the next industrial revolution for the United States. It would dwarf the amount of jobs created by WW2.
130 and bad humidity? We as people need to change
Why don't they factor in geo-engineering weather modification? Why is that portion never discussed?