Niro Sivanathan: The counterintuitive way to be more persuasive | TED

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 30. 05. 2024
  • What's the best way to make a good point? Organizational psychologist Niro Sivanathan offers a fascinating lesson on the "dilution effect," a cognitive quirk that weakens our strongest cases -- and reveals why brevity is the true soul of persuasion.
    Visit TED.com to get our entire library of TED Talks, transcripts, translations, personalized talk recommendations and more.
    The TED Talks channel features the best talks and performances from the TED Conference, where the world's leading thinkers and doers give the talk of their lives in 18 minutes (or less). Look for talks on Technology, Entertainment and Design -- plus science, business, global issues, the arts and more. You're welcome to link to or embed these videos, forward them to others and share these ideas with people you know.
    Follow TED on Twitter: / tedtalks
    Like TED on Facebook: / ted
    Subscribe to our channel: / ted
    TED's videos may be used for non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons License, Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives (or the CC BY - NC - ND 4.0 International) and in accordance with our TED Talks Usage Policy (www.ted.com/about/our-organiz.... For more information on using TED for commercial purposes (e.g. employee learning, in a film or online course), please submit a Media Request at media-requests.ted.com

Komentáře • 184

  • @twelvecatsinatrenchcoat
    @twelvecatsinatrenchcoat Před 3 lety +153

    If you've ever been in an argument on the internet you've seen this. If you start with one fantastic counterpoint and include a few weaker counterpoints -- whoever you're talking to will find the weakest one and attack it. They won't even remember the strong one.

    • @warrenbradford2597
      @warrenbradford2597 Před rokem +1

      I have been into arguments and I have just seen this.

    • @furusaogoge
      @furusaogoge Před rokem +3

      Oh yeah? People remember! What makes you an expert on memory? 🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'm sorry. I'm a Dad and I couldn't resist. Seriously, that's a great point. I wonder if it's related to people's tendency to strawman and/or to use red herrings.

  • @61uesatchannel41
    @61uesatchannel41 Před 3 lety +65

    I am a Japanese. I'm not good at listening, so this video was very educational. It's very easy to hear. And the material is very beautiful and the way of speaking is cool. I will come here again

    • @fearhead1556
      @fearhead1556 Před 3 lety

      How is the new PM there? And what about the slowing economy and population decline? Help me with your views on these issues.

    • @ahmadsaba9795
      @ahmadsaba9795 Před 3 lety

      ¹

  • @TCraats
    @TCraats Před 3 lety +20

    Going to sleep is important. But so is waking up. Excellent delivery

  • @GuillaumeRenart
    @GuillaumeRenart Před 3 lety +63

    This is the "broken dishes" experiment related by Daniel Kahneman in "thinking fast and slow". See part 2 chapter 15. Really eye opening.

  • @luciandurietz4148
    @luciandurietz4148 Před 3 lety +66

    in just 4 words: "sometimes less is more"

    • @asbestosrecuperation
      @asbestosrecuperation Před 3 lety +1

      3 words: less is more

    • @luciandurietz4148
      @luciandurietz4148 Před 3 lety +4

      @@asbestosrecuperation not always

    • @scottdake8566
      @scottdake8566 Před 3 lety +2

      Less is more IF the more is of a lower quality than what you already have....

    • @LiborSupcik
      @LiborSupcik Před rokem

      @@scottdake8566 which is always since the quality is in the ear of beholders

  • @KnowArt
    @KnowArt Před 3 lety +32

    This guy has some magnificent eyebrows

  • @thisisfaiaz
    @thisisfaiaz Před 3 lety +33

    The main listen of the video is "You cannot increase the quality of an argument by simply increasing the quantity of your argument" and "stick to your string arguments because your arguments don't add up in the minds of the receiver they average out."

    • @carmz620
      @carmz620 Před 3 lety +3

      It also points out how to expose someone is trying to influence your assessment of a situation on purpose by order of information.

    • @thisisfaiaz
      @thisisfaiaz Před 3 lety

      @@carmz620 Yeah!

    • @whysosad2973
      @whysosad2973 Před 3 lety

      @@carmz620 i am sorry i didn't get what you said. can you like give an example to make it more clear?

    • @carmz620
      @carmz620 Před 3 lety

      @@whysosad2973 You can spot, if someone is trying to influence your opinion when this person is obviosly using the "rules" of the video. For example: if someone wants to encourage you to buy a stock and he says "Yes, I have too admit, it's not super safe and some people say, it's too easy and not honourable to make money this way."

  • @reedofwater
    @reedofwater Před 3 lety +55

    This guy has never been overwhelmed by my daughter's barrage of reasons for ice cream.

  • @MrSidney9
    @MrSidney9 Před 3 lety +32

    Wow, very eye-opening. And delivered persuasively too. The presentation lives up to the message

  • @c.s.hayden3022
    @c.s.hayden3022 Před 3 lety +56

    They don’t add up, they average out. Interesting. It makes sense.

    • @nikhilvankar1609
      @nikhilvankar1609 Před 3 lety

      Hey didn’t followed his final message could you explain ?

    • @sandeepmandrawadkar9133
      @sandeepmandrawadkar9133 Před 3 lety +1

      @@nikhilvankar1609 Best part of the above presentation is that the quantity of arguments will reduce the quality of the argument.
      Hence avoid unnecessary explanation and stick to only what matters.

    • @achieving.excellence
      @achieving.excellence Před 3 lety

      Agreed Christopher... makes sense.

  • @Ajay-ei2jo
    @Ajay-ei2jo Před 3 lety +5

    Indians are literally Amazing ✨

  • @shereadsshescries1457
    @shereadsshescries1457 Před 3 lety +3

    Keep it short, and on point.

  • @trainkinder-getinspiredtol6433

    Awesome talk. Less is really more. Thank you for sharing!

  • @vas4739
    @vas4739 Před 3 lety

    Fantastic approach! I need to practice that for when I need it!!!

  • @sandeepmandrawadkar9133
    @sandeepmandrawadkar9133 Před 3 lety +2

    Great presentation 👏👌👍
    Narrated in quite a simple yet effective way 👌

  • @romaungabdulmonaf8306
    @romaungabdulmonaf8306 Před 3 lety +1

    Amazing story all of us

  • @priyacool2500
    @priyacool2500 Před 3 lety

    Wonderful insights

  • @warrenbradford2597
    @warrenbradford2597 Před rokem +2

    I will re-watch the video to memorize key points made in it. I want to improve my persuasive skills more.

  • @marvhellampa3265
    @marvhellampa3265 Před 3 lety +5

    I got this just on random, i'm glad i cliked it in. tnx

  • @henrycollins2478
    @henrycollins2478 Před 3 lety +130

    Jeez. That’s a lot for some plates and bowls.

    • @SG-gb5mx
      @SG-gb5mx Před 3 lety +1

      HAHAHAHHAHAHA i was thinking the exact same thing.

  • @TheHagaymuzan
    @TheHagaymuzan Před 3 lety +11

    Not all minds behave this way, some people know how to separate different information and react only to the important things. Personal experience.

    • @alphazulo2966
      @alphazulo2966 Před 3 lety

      Yes... This is the first comment.... May be general populas is too dumb to understand what is being delivered to them or.... Or they are too genius and understand that they only havr to look at things superficially so that the words of others don't penetrate their hearts.

    • @dryzalizer
      @dryzalizer Před 3 lety +1

      Thanks for mentioning this, I didn't react any differently to choices in the scenarios he gave like the subjects did.

    • @MattThomas43
      @MattThomas43 Před 3 lety

      Agree. I think this is based on the behaviour of non-experts. Run the dishes experiment with actual interested collectors and you'll get a different result. This kind of faulty critical thinking makes sense when the thinker has a hard time understanding the issues.

    • @gndp
      @gndp Před 3 lety +3

      True, However, I think that this would be the case when the stakes are high. When taking casual decisions, people rarely use their cognitive muscles, they let their subconscious take the decision.

  • @Connor-es5ry
    @Connor-es5ry Před 3 lety +1

    Finna use this to win among us cheers mate

  • @TrueCrimeQueen
    @TrueCrimeQueen Před 3 lety +2

    Love the channel! Stay safe everyone!

  • @corcoranmagriproperties
    @corcoranmagriproperties Před 3 lety +9

    Very interesting experiment and smart considerations! 👍

  • @jonathanwilgus5021
    @jonathanwilgus5021 Před 3 lety +6

    Here I was thinking TED was on it's way down, then they come out with this. Well done.

  • @DrickRT
    @DrickRT Před 3 lety

    That was surprisingly pretty good

  • @romaungabdulmonaf8306
    @romaungabdulmonaf8306 Před 3 lety +1

    Great good job

  • @acfatemi
    @acfatemi Před 3 lety

    Very interesting!!!!! Explains a lot! Now I understand what I might be doing wrongly in getting my message across.....
    Very helpful 🤨🧐😏🙁🤔😉😁

  • @fevronija
    @fevronija Před 3 lety

    So helpful! Thank you!

  • @snaresnarerson5296
    @snaresnarerson5296 Před 3 lety +25

    Today is the 21st day of the 21st year of the 21st century and it will soon be 21.21pm in england.
    Thanks for your time.

  • @xx99Username99xx
    @xx99Username99xx Před 3 lety +10

    I wonder how the passage of time plays into this Dilution Effect. Can you get more mileage out of multiple arguments by spacing out your delivery of those arguments? And if so, how much time is necessary? Do you need to give your audience a few weeks to mull over your previous argument before delivering a new argument, or can you just pause dramatically between each one?

  • @coltonsnyder1262
    @coltonsnyder1262 Před 3 lety +1

    This is really interesting, especially when considered along with game theory.

    • @ploopybear
      @ploopybear Před rokem +1

      everything is more interesting with game theory lol

  • @michaelb1785
    @michaelb1785 Před 3 lety

    A good lesson.

  • @homewall744
    @homewall744 Před 3 lety +24

    You certainly see it all arguments, where the other party focuses only on the weak arguments, ignores the strong ones, and may even add an ad hominem.

    • @twelvecatsinatrenchcoat
      @twelvecatsinatrenchcoat Před 3 lety

      Very true. Including more than one point in an internet argument is basically giving the other person a menu. "Oh, number 6 looks pretty easy to undermine."

  • @Nyngarra
    @Nyngarra Před 3 lety +4

    Very interesting talk! I would be interested if juggling around the sequence of the side effects of the drug is enough to change the attitude towards it. Like, this drug might cause cold feet, ...and heart attack PERIOD. Instead of having the minor effects at the end.

    • @oscaranacletokrause2238
      @oscaranacletokrause2238 Před 2 lety

      I dont think so because the side effects are still there. No minor side effects to distract their attention.

  • @JadeTrading
    @JadeTrading Před 3 lety +1

    Interesting plates and bowls experiment

  • @Elemenopi205
    @Elemenopi205 Před 3 lety +1

    That’s a good analysis now I know why I come across as unconvincing to some 😒

  • @liamross7
    @liamross7 Před 3 lety +7

    At first I thought the talk was gonna be how to persuade someone to give you the last set of plates you wanted at the store.

  • @mando8222
    @mando8222 Před rokem

    BEST PART OF VIDEO IS @ 9:40

  • @whysosad2973
    @whysosad2973 Před 3 lety +1

    i didn't understand the last part related to pharmaceutical ads. including the minor problems diluted the severity and made it seem it was less harmful? is that what he meant?

  • @yugen8382
    @yugen8382 Před 3 lety +5

    So when i want to persuade someone about something good i tell them less good about it.And when i want to defend something bad i tell them more bad about it...We humans are pretty stupid huh...

  • @danielmiraziz1093
    @danielmiraziz1093 Před 3 lety +5

    The "Gish gallop" technique often used in debates shows the exact opposite effect.

    • @pooja94ekbote
      @pooja94ekbote Před 3 lety +2

      That's because it's employed to strengthen the agreement of people who already agree with you, not to convince those who disagree

    • @danielmiraziz1093
      @danielmiraziz1093 Před 3 lety +1

      @@pooja94ekbote
      That's fair. Debates are more about rhetoric than persuasion.

  • @jasonmillers6941
    @jasonmillers6941 Před 6 měsíci

    Dope

  • @jamesrad6317
    @jamesrad6317 Před 3 lety +3

    The opener is one of these Daniel Kahnemann "all people are idiots/irrational" things. xD

  • @narrativegatherer3128
    @narrativegatherer3128 Před 3 lety +1

    Legends know that this talk was first published on TEDxLondonBusinessSchool.

  • @abhisheksinghal3358
    @abhisheksinghal3358 Před 2 lety

    Quality 10 minutes, if implemented to the t, could result in an enormous gain

  • @ranfromrandomcan
    @ranfromrandomcan Před 3 lety +1

    I have never come this fast

  • @lenguyendieulinh5902
    @lenguyendieulinh5902 Před 3 lety

    👍

  • @jpbernie72
    @jpbernie72 Před 3 lety

    Nice talk with a good message. However, in the study example, "dilution," made a stronger case for buying the drug. So, the concept is situational. True, but situational.

    • @qntonia
      @qntonia Před 3 lety

      I think the point is getting people to do or adhere to what you want or believe in. Not so much from the perspective of making the "right" choice.

    • @LawrenceAugust_
      @LawrenceAugust_ Před 3 lety

      Correct, because it was diluting the negative qualities of the drug. It diluted the counter argument to buying. What sold the drug is whatever simple message was put forward (ie lowers cholesterol).

  • @TOSStarTrek
    @TOSStarTrek Před 3 lety +2

    KISS principle

  • @danielwilson996
    @danielwilson996 Před 2 lety

    this idea was early found by Daniel Kahneman . This book is good for everyone to read

  • @MissAtlantique
    @MissAtlantique Před 3 lety +2

    Women know that by writing a long text to a man, he will only read one sentence and will stop focusing on the rest :D ....we still do that none the less. Brilliant talk. Always good to remind ourselves about such things

  • @syk2973
    @syk2973 Před 2 lety

    This guy

  • @user-oe2qf3rr2l
    @user-oe2qf3rr2l Před 3 lety

    이 강연의 핵심은 무엇인지 1시간째 생각 중인 1인;;;

  • @tommyteapot13
    @tommyteapot13 Před 3 lety +7

    I thought about £20 lol

  • @elviscoso01
    @elviscoso01 Před 3 lety +3

    You misspelled manipulative in the title of the video.

  • @AutoHunter
    @AutoHunter Před 3 lety +10

    Don't know if someone is reading but if you are 🤗🤝: you are amazing and beautiful! I believe in you!♥b

  • @ADOwens-px8xm
    @ADOwens-px8xm Před 3 lety

    So strong argument > strong argument + weak argument because of dilution effect in the mind.

  • @hasnainqaiyumi185
    @hasnainqaiyumi185 Před 3 lety +1

    But isn't telling only relevant quantity of information would mean, omission of other relevant information, because omission of complete information is considered wrong in many jurisdictions.
    In some cases organisations can be penalised

    • @bobymathew5740
      @bobymathew5740 Před 3 lety

      This dilution effect is regarding how people usually think, which is not completely rational. For professional analysis, complete information is very essential. There, the professionals would be using better calculations and be more rational.

  • @jb.899
    @jb.899 Před 3 lety +2

    Her now

  • @user-jw2zq1pc8v
    @user-jw2zq1pc8v Před 3 lety +2

    Я ничего не понимаю но я слушаю чтобы понять

  • @felixgugler
    @felixgugler Před 3 lety +3

    my question is: what kind of students was he talking to?

  • @ineptireplica1548
    @ineptireplica1548 Před 3 lety

    Isnt this a repost?

  • @NaveedGhalib
    @NaveedGhalib Před 3 lety

    Magic number is 3 arguments. Always 3

  • @GabrielPerez-xo3ui
    @GabrielPerez-xo3ui Před rokem

    I guess this can be used the other way around too? Like if you need to tell bad news about your performance to your boss. You can dillute the bad news with other less relevant bad news?

  • @logangrimnar3800
    @logangrimnar3800 Před 3 lety +13

    Ok so it it just me or is 300+ a lot for a dinner set. In USD that's like 450

    • @InnuendoXP
      @InnuendoXP Před 3 lety +1

      yeah that bit was very un-relateable to me. I can imagine a set being priced that much, I couldn't imagine ever buying it though. Seems like a product for the fool & their money demographic.

    • @Marz2695
      @Marz2695 Před 3 lety +1

      he said it's a luxury line so It's reasonable in my mind.

    • @thecoldglassofwatershow
      @thecoldglassofwatershow Před 7 měsíci

      They’re Gucci plates 😅

  • @mmagearworks
    @mmagearworks Před 3 lety

    I would pay less for the second dinnerware set because I do not want to take the garbage. I would have to throw away the broken dishes.

  • @LuckyFish3000
    @LuckyFish3000 Před 3 lety +2

    So what is the summary? Please

    • @InnuendoXP
      @InnuendoXP Před 3 lety +1

      Stick to your strongest argument, and get to the point.

    • @3_up_moon
      @3_up_moon Před 3 lety +2

      @@InnuendoXP oh, like this guy didn't do

    • @BrutusAlbion
      @BrutusAlbion Před 3 lety

      @@3_up_moon 😂

    • @albyshinyfield8841
      @albyshinyfield8841 Před 3 lety

      @@3_up_moon he actually made the one argument multiple different ways

  • @prasanna2589
    @prasanna2589 Před 3 lety

    I can appreciate the speaker exploring the flaws of what we pay attention to and educating people about it for a change rather than selling out to ad companies or social media but to me it seems without direction.. ok there is this flaw, now what?.. isnt the whole point of researching flaws to fix em by compensating their detrimental effects rather than using them as loopholes?

    • @zombeaver69
      @zombeaver69 Před rokem +1

      knowledge something is wrong is the first step to correcting it

  • @LiborSupcik
    @LiborSupcik Před rokem +1

    Beautiful but still ...compare the video in its whole to its last minute. The whole is not true to its own medicine. The communication is diluted by too many examples. After a year I think it is clear the public in general did not notice this important but under convincing message.

  • @MagnumMotivation
    @MagnumMotivation Před 3 lety +1

    Five persuasive techniques for you to become successful in life:
    Establish trust and develop credibility.
    Understand the reader's purpose and align your own.
    Pay attention to language.
    Consider tone.
    Use rhetoric and repetition.
    Cheers.

  • @haoxus9413
    @haoxus9413 Před 3 lety +6

    I question this guy's experiment methodology. One time experiment is too unreliable, and I wonder how he framed the questions, 190ero for that?

  • @brightstories263
    @brightstories263 Před 3 lety +8

    We need THESE PEOPLE, not Kardashians...

  • @xapa5509
    @xapa5509 Před 3 lety

    Please caption kurdish

  • @kirylkrasouski
    @kirylkrasouski Před 2 lety

    Yeah but how about that the major serious side effects are very rare compared to minor side effects?

  • @NimbusBeats
    @NimbusBeats Před 2 lety +1

    damn I only said 20 -25 $

  • @Zerobob26
    @Zerobob26 Před 3 lety

    I disagree. Broken pieces in a PREMIUM dinner set would mean that the set is no longer complete, and there would likely be empty spaces in its velvet-lined display case, or similar, reducing its aesthetic quality... which is important in a PREMIUM dinner set. It would also suggest that the set has suffered a big impact of some kind, and there may be hidden damage to the other items, such as imperceivable hairline cracks and weaknesses. You'd also have the added inconvenience of disposing of the broken items.
    I feel this talk attempts to brush over the complexities of purchasing items - and physics - with conveniently simplified strawman examples, whilst also suggesting there is no inherent value in things such as aesthetics, human intuition, and convenience.

    • @Theraot
      @Theraot Před 3 lety

      The talks argues for keeping argument simple, and follows its own advice.
      I agree that the way people priced the items in the experiment is not unfounded. Which supports that the effect is real, even if not as irrational as portrayed, and that is enough to take advantage of the effect. The talk avoids the topic, and in doing so appeals to a larger audience.
      (This is my attempt to follow the advice, how did it go?)

    • @Zerobob26
      @Zerobob26 Před 3 lety

      ​@@Theraot You did well. As a software developer I have to reduce complicated things to 'layman's terms' constantly for people to understand, a skill I learned was essential years ago.
      Ultimately, all I'm saying it that the devil is frequently in the detail, and it isn't always a good idea to brush over it.

  • @jb.899
    @jb.899 Před 3 lety +3

    Her

  • @kellypeterson3660
    @kellypeterson3660 Před 2 lety

    Be honest in other words.

  • @stephendelacruzone
    @stephendelacruzone Před rokem

    Dilution Effect... hmm... 🤔

  • @charlottescott7150
    @charlottescott7150 Před 3 lety

    People are so weird! I would pay the same for both dinner sets and would have said that if I had to choose who had the bigger GPA I would have guessed Tom as he is more rounded as a person. The drug advert one is just crazy. It helps explain why our democracies are so dreadful. Sound bites are preferred to nuanced arguments.

  • @AAR0NWE1R
    @AAR0NWE1R Před 3 lety +6

    bro this dude talks so slow, actually had this on 1.5x

    • @gndp
      @gndp Před 3 lety

      I believe that the faster you listen, the shallower the message goes into your brain. So once in a while, I listen to even the slow speech videos at 1x.

  • @Superstardark
    @Superstardark Před 3 lety

    Indian tim meadows

  • @LuciferMorningstar____

    Ctrl+B on those eyebrows

  • @jetw9522
    @jetw9522 Před 3 lety +4

    Basically, he is trying to convey the message of speaking less and get to the point. but he spent more than 2 minutes and a half talking about the plates. I almost lost my patience. Although I like his main point, unfortunately, his talk showed me more "the counterproductive way to be more persuasive" 🤷

  • @katherineindita1444
    @katherineindita1444 Před 3 lety

    paparapakyu

  • @alanasand44
    @alanasand44 Před 3 lety +1

    Am I not normal? Because in my mind I said I would pay the same.

    • @alanasand44
      @alanasand44 Před 3 lety

      @@user-zv5xd6db3n ohhh...I was just listening to the items and I thought, “I’d pay the same for both sets.”

    • @fep_ptcp883
      @fep_ptcp883 Před 3 lety +1

      @@alanasand44 1 Upon close inspection, nobody is normal. 2 Perhaps you are not interested in cups. 3 Perhaps you have dyscalculia. 4 Nice profile pic, you're gorgeous.

    • @alanasand44
      @alanasand44 Před 3 lety +1

      @@fep_ptcp883 hahah!! I definitely have dyscalculia!! I’m also a big thrift store shopper so broken or damaged items don’t bother me. In a way I find them more beautiful! ❤️ and thank you so much for the kind compliment! You made my day!!

    • @fep_ptcp883
      @fep_ptcp883 Před 3 lety

      @@alanasand44 Nice, i made your day by simply speaking the truth, that's cool. You seem like a lovely person (don't know why) and just felt like complimenting you for your gorgeous pic, 'cause why not? And thanks for teaching me a new word, _thrift_ . I'm adding to my vocabulary. 😉

  • @consciencecuisine
    @consciencecuisine Před 3 lety +1

    thickest eyebrows I've ever seen!!!

  • @jb.899
    @jb.899 Před 3 lety +1

    Muzzle

  • @Chris-op7yt
    @Chris-op7yt Před 3 lety

    there might be some truth to it but the larger set with btoken cups also represents buying into risk that the plates may in fact contain faults.
    you completely ignored this factor

    • @RGW88
      @RGW88 Před 3 lety

      I have to spend time getting rid of the broken one's. That cost me MY time, the most valuable thing I am willing to trade with.

  • @cole_kirby1057
    @cole_kirby1057 Před 2 lety

    Boken

  • @JakeyMikeySmithey
    @JakeyMikeySmithey Před 3 lety

    iF yOu WiLl

  • @pooplicker6941
    @pooplicker6941 Před 3 lety

    damn m rly early

  • @Dillon964
    @Dillon964 Před 3 lety

    he has big eyebrows

  • @valentinbonnarde9345
    @valentinbonnarde9345 Před 3 lety +1

    To be more persuasive to dumb people though

  • @alphazulo2966
    @alphazulo2966 Před 3 lety

    Renamed
    How to sell to the masses

  • @jaunepapillon578
    @jaunepapillon578 Před 3 lety

    First

  • @songyuguang
    @songyuguang Před 2 lety

    Less is more

  • @ashmykaferns2816
    @ashmykaferns2816 Před 3 lety

    The graceful burma peripherally offend because picture seasonally scream following a true random. little, soggy handicap

  • @Latoija
    @Latoija Před 3 lety +9

    It’s taking him so long to get to the point.

    • @ellie698
      @ellie698 Před 3 lety

      Yeah
      I gave up listening.
      Very boring speaker