@@razorxd9315yeah and that wasn't the first tank appearance in ww1 It was the British in the battle of flers-courcelette and it came in pairs one man destroyer and the other is a tank u know female and male tanks really unreliable and slow but was revolutionary at the time
@razorxd9315 that doesn't mean everyone has seen one. With drafting from everyone and during this time. That's why he said imagine you could be one of those who had never seen one.
Sure it was that's why are war films made.. to scare people. but still believe Stalingrad 1993 was more realistic and terrifying. This felt sometimes unreal if you look at details, dont believe that they would shoot at tank with rifles nor they would be so surprised by seeing a tank as they were already produced. One of the reasons why there were barbed wires.. as tank would get his tracks stuck.
@@sapiensiski ya cause it was a war they definitely did create some good tanks like tiger 1 &2 and maus but not in large quantities. They created medium tanks in more numbers cause it was cost efficient and they just needed a huge numbers of tanks!
@@Mihirsingh509weren't maus tank never used in war? Since it was destroyed by Russians? There is one maus that survived in war which is just in museum but wasn't used
It was a British Officer in the 1930s who wrote a book about future of Tank warfare and the British Army ignored his advice and the German military read the book and took his advice and ideas and made them their own and the rest is history
Same for the French with Charles de Gaulle, he wrote book about Tanks followed by infantry, and the old French marshals and Generals ignored that. Guderian also took notes about the book.
Its just hearthbreaking to see and imagine the fear building up in soldiers with clear souls enjoying the probably last moments of their lives knowing they have a family waiting for them...
The heartbreaking detail for me, is that despite all of the effort put in by men on every side, their territory moved by feet and not miles, all the while more of them were dying from the various worst of illnesses than they were dying from combat. These men came home after years of watching their friends die fighting for a few hundred feet of trench, it's no wonder how a second world war happened with the following generation. I cannot imagine even hearing those stories first-hand from the men who experienced it all, and what that does to the psyche to even hear about all that experience, much less experiencing it first-hand to the level that it locks sounds, sights, tastes and smells from it into your memory forever.
@Armor3d0ne huh? You don't see that giant crew served machine gun barrel sticking out of the hull of that tank? Even the original tank,that was nothing more than a track mounted box,had a machine gun
This is one of my favourite WW1 movies. People went into war thinking it would be a few weeks or months, and they would be charging on steads like in the middle ages. But they were dragged into a 4 year hellscape in some of the most gruesome conditions, and facing the most destructive weapons known to europe at that point.
Wasn’t necessarily the first time tanks were used, but the first time these soldiers had seen tanks. That’s more what the scene tries to accomplish and it does it perfectly.
@@plantboy6249yeah but with new recruits all they have heard up to that point is stories of tanks. Seeing one for the first time, especially down the barrel of one, was probably insanely terrifying which is how the soldiers are depicted in the movie. You’re right though, there were definitely a good amount of veterans who knew how to try and deal with tanks, but I can’t imagine the terror when you see an enemy tank for the first time
@@alexcros1398 1916 perhaps but this was set in 1918. So even the tanks used in the sequence was wrong. New recruits would have seen tanks in the backline, Germany was fielding hundreds of captured British tanks in 7 tank battalions.
@@hvr1874well those are station soldiers (they haven't left their post in years) and were mostly made of news recruits. So most of them never seen a tank in real life. Because in that specific place they're been fighting for over 2yrs no tank was present till that moment. Note it was 1918 no internet no portable video players, they most likely only heard of tanks never seen one
Actually would have been hilarious like something out of Austin Powers. Screaming Nooooo for 10 minutes while the Saint-Chamond tank creeps towards you at maybe 4km/h.
Some humans have a natural sense of fear of the unknown. Seeing a huge metal block with sticks that shoots out explosives and bullets barely even having effects on it is straight up gonna make you pale.
Not really. This Scene takes place in 1918... just days before the war ends. By that point, Tanks had been around some 2 years, and even Germany had their own versions. Tanks were well known about, and both sides had already figured out how to deal with them. They weren't these shocking things that struck fear into the enemy. If anything, tanks were far easier on the troops, as at least these enemies were easier to kill with artillery barrages, or even well placed explosives, when compared to the human waves.
@@IL0VEDUMPLINGSinsanity is something I would contend that someone with your propensity for all CAPS and poor grammar is unqualified to diagnose. Much less from a comment on a video. Especially since the actors' faces are conveying a look of terror in what the original commenter finds to be an amazing way.
For anyone who's wondering, those are St Chammon tanks. They weren't the best at trench crossing but were very good at being moble long range artillery.
When tanks were first introduced in 1916, German soldiers talked about how it was like metal alligators sliding through the mud. Although this scene is not the first introduction of tanks, it's still a very good scene
At least they on the outside and are able to destroy it, the crew of that tank are the ones who should be afraid, they know that the vehicle they're in doesn't have good fighting capabilities and they're rolling right towards the enemy lines, the tank has very thin armor too to the point where small arms fire can penatrate it.
@SlavaUkraini250 um what are you talking about the tank was built to withstand small arms fire all they could do was lob grenades into there hatches or shoot through the vents they (at least in this scene) had no weapons to delete it without killing themselves these steel behemoths were unstoppable without the correct weapons and no one did when they showed up and the weapons to kill them were few and far between in the later years
Tanks had been deployed long time ago before this movie takes place, all quiet on the western front happens weeks before the end of the Great War, while the first tanks had been deployed long ago already
I was going to say that as well, also tanks back then total arse they did not go very far before breaking down also terribly slow compared to the tanks the showed in the video
I was thinking the same thing. Being a landship nerd I was curious why they chose these over the British* ones then remembered, they are quite literally metal scrap piles barely functioning lol
Context of clip: this is taken from the ww1 film ‘All Quiet On The Western Front’ basically in this clip the Germans (soldiers eating) had just liberated a French trench and started eating their rations. And as you can see the tanks (French tanks) heard the Germans were attacking and stormed over the trenches crushing soldiers and shooting them with machine guns.
Many were even younger as the governments used tactics to get people to join by painting the war as a french vacation, many lied about their age so kids ad young as 15 were getting mowed down in this war
This movie is generally accepted to be quite accurate as far as movies go. Obviously none are perfect. I haven't yet seen it, but from what I've heard and seen of it, I'd like to. Keep in mind the caption the uploader put on this video is indeed incorrect. This tank appears to be a late-war French design, certainly not the first tanks to be used in combat, as anyone knows. Also they're in a recently captured French trench, which explains the relative abundance of food compared to what would have been expected to be seen in the average German or Austro-Hungarian trench by that point in the war, at least in my mind.
@@raiden0801the battlefield games are arcade shooters, they're close enough to be a lot of fun lol. Still miles ahead of any COD games. At least they have proper sized maps and servers 😅
Or as well the first time flamethrowers, toxic gas and landmines were used on the battlefield. Just the actual war on the battlefield made WW1 the worst that ever happened to soldiers. Of course every war is horrible but the amount of terror the soldiers had to feel was different that time.
It must have been teriffying. It is told that the most of the German Soldiers just gave up and ran away in fear as the tanks were approaching. Only few tried to fight them off with grenades.
Out of all the WW1 movies this one is my favourite, I don’t speak German but watching it in German with English subtitles sounds better and just makes it feel more real
The soldiers in WW1 mutve really felt like it was the end of the world due to the amount of technological advancements... Fighter planes, tanks.. the war literally went from horses/muskets to modern war with machine guns, tanks and planes.
@@mr.battledroid2195yeah but nothing like an armored bunker moving towards them and being x10 times stronger than all of these armored vehicles and zepelins
@@minotaurocurioso1756 no, it wasn’t 10x times stronger, a simple stielhand could destroy them, German troops were also equipped with portable cannons, and the idea of tanks existed before ww1
Muskets exited service in the 1870s. Horses were used even in ww2. Machine guns also existed long before the war started. War capable biplane already existed, guns began being mounted soon into the war.
"worst way to start my day?.. probably burnt pancakes and bitter coffee.. how about you?" " *28 tons of impenetrable metal moving towards my location.* "
It was actually very common to rapid fire at enemy tanks even with small caliber rifles, although the possibility for doing damage was minimal it still had a great effect on the tank crew as the loud noise irritates and small metal pieces flew through the interior damaging equipment and crew. So it was not meant to penetrate the front armor, but to damage the guns, lenses and tracks of the tank.
@@AureliusOstard-rg6mqearly K bullets were effective against the earlier armor and using armor piercing bullets later developed for the machine guns helped when concentrating on a singular tank
Funnily enough, one of the first anti-tank rounds developed in WWI consisted of taking a standard rifle cartridge, and flipping the bullet around. Apparently smacking into the plate backside first helped it smash through.
@@neilkurzman4907 depends on the velocity of the bullet (a typical rifle caliber bullet traveling at subsonic speeds would probably be more aerodynamic going backwards) but generally, assuming you’re using the same powder charge, pretty bad. This was not something you’d be using at any serious distance, and was more a stop gap solution while more dedicated anti-armor weapons/ammunition could be developed.
If you've watched the movie, they were indeed awestruck at the sight of those tanks but what they were more concerned about was hundreds of infantry following behind those tanks.
This is a real story : Translated into English from a biography of a german soldier's book : _September 15, 1916_ _This morning, we heard a dull and regular noise that came from no man's land. We thought it was the enemy artillery that was preparing to fire, but we did not see any projectiles whistling over our heads. We looked through the loopholes of our trenches, and we saw strange shapes that moved slowly towards us. They looked like iron boxes mounted on tracks, with cannons and machine guns that came out of all sides. We had never seen such war machines. We thought they were monsters sent by the devil to annihilate us._ _We opened fire with our rifles and machine guns, but the bullets bounced off the armor of the tanks without stopping them. Some were hit by our shells or were blocked by obstacles, but others continued their inexorable progress. They crossed our barbed wire as if nothing had happened, and reached our lines. They fired on our positions with incredible violence, wreaking havoc among our comrades. Some tried to flee, but they were mowed down by the machine guns. Others tried to defend themselves in hand-to-hand combat, but they were crushed under the tracks or pierced by the bayonets of the English infantrymen who followed the tanks._ _I was lucky enough to survive this massacre, by hiding in a shell hole. I saw a tank pass a few meters from me. It was painted brown and bore the number 705. It had a red cross on the side, which meant it was carrying wounded. It was escorted by two English soldiers who looked at me with contempt. I felt powerless and humiliated. I wondered how we could resist this new weapon that seemed invincible. I wondered if the war was lost for us..._
Imagine being the first enemy trooper to encounter this unknown fortress . Would've rumbled from a mile away.. shook the ground when closing.. insanely terrifying. Like trexes just entered war
There's also an og one too! I can honestly without any ego or bias the remake is 10x better than the og and the og one is pretty good too! 👍 👌 you're all very welcome! By the way, thank you for all the likes as well!
It was even worse in WW2. Everything the allies thought they knew about armored warfare the Germans would just stampede right over them or make them suffer for every step they took towards them, there's documentaries about Sherman crew members hearing the Panthers high velocity rounds and then surviving penetration with the round ripping right out the other side completely and clean. And the real time PTSD Churchill and Stuart tankers had when going over a hill and seeing a tiger 1 for the first time reporting on the battlefield and seeing it sit there and just casually claim the lives of everything it's gun looked at. Tanks are no joke even if our anti tank tactics have evolved.
Ей богу, иногда я задумываюсь, что было бы, если бы эти сотни миллионов молодых, здоровых, амбициозных мужчин и женщин не погибли бы на двух мировых войнах в интересах правящего класса, а занимались бы тем о чем мечтали. Наукой, искусством, философией, да просто бы были с семьёй и работали, жили своей маленькой тихой жизнью о которой многие мечтают. Каким бы мог бы быть мир.
@@pndfarm2710 Under the capitalist formation, yes. As a Marxist, I have devoted quite a lot of time to studying the social mechanisms of this phenomenon. Hence, yes, imperialist wars are the inevitable companion of capitalism. And it doesn't matter, fascism, liberalism, social democracy. Liberal democracies fight well and a lot.
@@Sevas_Askinand comunistic russia is one of the most brutal and go to war coutries all allong with comunistic North Korei'a and few other comunistic places in azja.
Just imagine actually being at the place the first tank was used in war. Thinking you’re winning a fight and out of nowhere the grounds shaking and a giant moving metal box with a tube coming out of it is coming towards you
Tanks were quite frightening when they first appeared although that fear was quickly dispelled when out of the initial 32, only about 8 actually reached the enemy line through mechanical failure, terrain and a mix of enemy artillery fire. Still a horrifying sight to see something like that inexorably walking towards you at walking pace while rifle rounds just bounce of it.
in the movie the tank is a snt chammond the french tank so its not the first appearance in war as the first tank built and used was british@@howardzhang5421
@@anothergermanmainNo and yes. Go further above the comment and there's a comment explaining it in detail. This is the first time these soldiers had seen a tank, and even if it wasn't, tanks weren't seen that often near the end.
@@zenithofeverythingTanks were used as break through tanks so no wonder. And the British were one of the Wide producers of tanks in WWl. And most of the time the Germans were fighting the French and British soldiers. And it took months to ship out tanks due to the extreme weight.
@@Jpz-4-5 Yup. I think modern media has made it seem like WW1 was filled to the brim with tanks. When in reality It was only during major battles and, like you said, breakthroughs.
@@zenithofeverything it’s really a shame. Soon the next generation will be told lies and propaganda to make the war efforts seem more appealing. Like America joining WWl to help. Hell no they only joined because France and Britain took loans from and if they were defeated there would be a lot of unpaid debt.
If anyone is wondering, no this is in fact not the first introduction of tanks, as the French and British had already been using tanks for the previous 2 years before this scene takes place. The Germans would’ve already had light mobile artillery and anti tank rifles rip to apart the counter attack.
The Brits invented the rank, and were the first to field them in combat. The first tank prototype was produced in England in 1915. I don’t consider DaVinci’s version to be a modern combat tank so does not count.
@@batuhansimsek1610all quiet on the western front, German made movie, on Netflix, about the Germans perspective during ww1 and how horrible war can be, absolute must watch
@@brodiegoodenough8412 The 1970's movie is a lot closer to the book, and the newest one gets so many things wrong, but it does capture the feeling better than the previous two movies of the book.
Of course it's like people forget the meaning of war and what a "sigma"is smh.Not saying none of them were "sigma" or even "alpha males" but it's just those words have lost their way sadly....😔
WW2 was whole different story We got the Armoured Personal Carrier Germany, The first operational jet fighter He 178 {Germany}, The first Helicopter R-4 (USA), The first Assault Rifle STG-44 (Germany), The first Nuclear Weapon The Little boy and fat man (USA). The Cold war is even more advanced The development of the AK-47 (USSR), The first Attack Helicopter The Ah-1 Cobra (USA). Two Iconic helicopters the Bell Uh-1 Huey (USA) and Mil Mi-24 Crocodile (USSR). Modern Times is way more advanced The first Stealth Bomber (USA). The more weapons on The Tiger attack helicopter (Germany and france), The most advanced Stealth fighter The F-22 Raptor and F-35 Lighting
@@excelsian512That is the only shells these things would be using because naval grade armor piercing shells are just going way far into the mud for anti-bunker operations
![tattoo printer tutorial[제품단순선물]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/g40_GwEJak0/mqdefault.jpg)
Imagine never seeing a car in your life and all of sudden you’re looking at 20 ton tank heading your way
💀💀
I didn’t even think about that they done such a good thing to bring up
They had cars during the period of WW1 though 💀.
The Archduke who was assassinated was literally killed while he was in a car
@@razorxd9315yeah and that wasn't the first tank appearance in ww1
It was the British in the battle of flers-courcelette and it came in pairs one man destroyer and the other is a tank u know female and male tanks really unreliable and slow but was revolutionary at the time
@razorxd9315 that doesn't mean everyone has seen one. With drafting from everyone and during this time. That's why he said imagine you could be one of those who had never seen one.
you know there’s a boss fight coming when you come across a room full of healing items
😅😅😅
OMG this should be top comment. So underrated. 🤣 it's always be like that in Games 😂
That’s not funny
@@Benscoots2050yes it is 😂
@@Benscoots2050it is Ben. Get back to your farm
Film name: All Quiet on the Western Front.
Watched it myself and I strongly recommend it.
Let's not hope bunch of sigma kids sees it.
@@iIdentifyAsKinglol
This was I think the 3rd making of the novel.
Only complaint is that the film looks too clean and crisp to be a gritty WW1 film
No the Name is im Westen Nix neues in germany
This movie was brutal
It isn’t the movie brutal, it is the war
Sure it was that's why are war films made.. to scare people. but still believe Stalingrad 1993 was more realistic and terrifying. This felt sometimes unreal if you look at details, dont believe that they would shoot at tank with rifles nor they would be so surprised by seeing a tank as they were already produced. One of the reasons why there were barbed wires.. as tank would get his tracks stuck.
@@Michelangelo_25war is brutal though
Come and see is the best war film ever made
@@jandys6328The early tanks would barely stop high caliber rifle rounds. Shooting at them was natural
German : that shit is unstoppable
Also German few decades later : this shit is hot
With MAUS AND TIGER TANKS
Too bad the tanks they made were mediocre and didnt define the developement of tanks
We fcked, We learn, We over engineer it.
@@sapiensiski ya cause it was a war they definitely did create some good tanks like tiger 1 &2 and maus but not in large quantities. They created medium tanks in more numbers cause it was cost efficient and they just needed a huge numbers of tanks!
@@Mihirsingh509weren't maus tank never used in war? Since it was destroyed by Russians? There is one maus that survived in war which is just in museum but wasn't used
Those guys were starving, they disregarded battle and went straight to food
lmao
no battle
eat
Eat food
Not bullets
Poor solgers
I mean there humans not artificial intelligence
That are the St. Chanond tank. The second French tank ever made (the first being the ca1) the first ever tank was the mark 1 developed by the British
C'est le char saint-Chamond . J'habite dans la ville de Saint chamond ou ce char a été construit. Un exemplaire y est pour le voir.
The Mark 1 wasn't exactly the 1st tank ever made.
@@bobfg3130 ok. First mass produced and battle effective tank... You knew what I ment
The British Mark 1 was the first tank ever used in combat, what’s your point?@@bobfg3130
@@bobfg3130 first built and used in combat tho
It was a British Officer in the 1930s who wrote a book about future of Tank warfare and the British Army ignored his advice and the German military read the book and took his advice and ideas and made them their own and the rest is history
Same for the French with Charles de Gaulle, he wrote book about Tanks followed by infantry, and the old French marshals and Generals ignored that. Guderian also took notes about the book.
What’s the book called
@@jacobe9187 the officer was called Major General John Frederick Charles Fuller and their is an entire story about him on Wikipedia
@@jacobe9187 / Tanks.
@@anthonykoller4459thanks
It wasn't the first time tanks were used. It's a great scene without you making stuff up
Yea, the whole story is about the closing of ww1
@@Joltfox_YT ??
@@Joltfox_YT the whole story is about young german who lied about his age to join the army and died at the end
@sanjoy khuman yes those were french tanks
That’s the first time he sees a tank in the movie
For the people who are wondering the movie is called (all quiet on the western front)
Спасибо
My grandpa has a novel by that name lmao I still have it 😂
@@muhammadbinshahzad6701 It's based on that I think
@@zsomborbalogh3837 probably 😃
@@zsomborbalogh3837and yes indeed it is
Its just hearthbreaking to see and imagine the fear building up in soldiers with clear souls enjoying the probably last moments of their lives knowing they have a family waiting for them...
The heartbreaking detail for me, is that despite all of the effort put in by men on every side, their territory moved by feet and not miles, all the while more of them were dying from the various worst of illnesses than they were dying from combat. These men came home after years of watching their friends die fighting for a few hundred feet of trench, it's no wonder how a second world war happened with the following generation. I cannot imagine even hearing those stories first-hand from the men who experienced it all, and what that does to the psyche to even hear about all that experience, much less experiencing it first-hand to the level that it locks sounds, sights, tastes and smells from it into your memory forever.
Gott beschütze dich!!!
Those tanks didn't kill anyone though.
@@Armor3d0nethey literally did tho?
@Armor3d0ne huh? You don't see that giant crew served machine gun barrel sticking out of the hull of that tank? Even the original tank,that was nothing more than a track mounted box,had a machine gun
That synth-jazz type of soundtrack makes everything sexier!
agreed
What's the soundtrack name?
In essence by kastro (extremely slowed)
When the bunkers start moving
What is the name of the movie
@@ghadeersyriac(all quiet western) i think
@@ghadeersyriac "All Quiet on the Western Front"
@@Niko_Niko_Ni- thank you
Checkmate.... "I know we've had our differences in the past...."
“Earthquake?”
“ No captain, deadlifts “
new pr?
Lunk alert 😂
No captain,Battle Formations 😊
@@juggernaut_collective only for men of culture❤
It's Dr. Dre...
This is one of my favourite WW1 movies. People went into war thinking it would be a few weeks or months, and they would be charging on steads like in the middle ages. But they were dragged into a 4 year hellscape in some of the most gruesome conditions, and facing the most destructive weapons known to europe at that point.
И при этом Россия победила☝️❗ Россия сила☝️❗ Россия мощь☝️❗
Indeed, indeed.....
the end of the world if ever. So hard to imagine, what had been unleashed.
After the tanks came the guys with flamethrowers and bayonet charge. One of the few movies showing how badass the french army was during WWI.
Wasn’t necessarily the first time tanks were used, but the first time these soldiers had seen tanks. That’s more what the scene tries to accomplish and it does it perfectly.
Well in reality by that point in the war infantrymen would have bee well prepared to face tanks, they had been supplied with anti-tank equipment.
@@plantboy6249yeah but with new recruits all they have heard up to that point is stories of tanks. Seeing one for the first time, especially down the barrel of one, was probably insanely terrifying which is how the soldiers are depicted in the movie. You’re right though, there were definitely a good amount of veterans who knew how to try and deal with tanks, but I can’t imagine the terror when you see an enemy tank for the first time
@@alexcros1398 1916 perhaps but this was set in 1918. So even the tanks used in the sequence was wrong. New recruits would have seen tanks in the backline, Germany was fielding hundreds of captured British tanks in 7 tank battalions.
Yea no shit sherlock, he was saying it in general
@@hvr1874well those are station soldiers (they haven't left their post in years) and were mostly made of news recruits. So most of them never seen a tank in real life. Because in that specific place they're been fighting for over 2yrs no tank was present till that moment. Note it was 1918 no internet no portable video players, they most likely only heard of tanks never seen one
Imagine seeing that bulletproof monster running over your comrades
That’s exactly why they made them so damn long.
ITS ARTHUR
ITS ARTHUR
Actually would have been hilarious like something out of Austin Powers. Screaming Nooooo for 10 minutes while the Saint-Chamond tank creeps towards you at maybe 4km/h.
As far as i know those Things were not Bullet proof
"OVER HUNDRED YEARS AGO.
WE FIRST ROLLED INTO FIRE.
RULERS OF THE BATTLEFIELD
CRAWLING OVER TRENCH AND WIRE"
Sabaton?
Artillery is the ruler of battlefield
But then again tanks are also moving Artillery
@@ChristianTheAccursed
No they are not
Drones have entered the chat
Soldiers: "What in the Leonardo DaVinci is going on?"
Call back to the first tank
In all seriousness, I couldn’t imagine how terrifying it would be to see a tank for the first time
And I’m person
Espacially if it moves toward you
Das grubstall maschinen auf hellraum 😅
Some humans have a natural sense of fear of the unknown. Seeing a huge metal block with sticks that shoots out explosives and bullets barely even having effects on it is straight up gonna make you pale.
But this wasn't the first time?
The sheer terror on their faces as they watch the tanks make their way to them was amazing
@@IL0VEDUMPLINGS”that’s”
@@IL0VEDUMPLINGSthey mean their interpretation was stunning
Not really. This Scene takes place in 1918... just days before the war ends. By that point, Tanks had been around some 2 years, and even Germany had their own versions. Tanks were well known about, and both sides had already figured out how to deal with them. They weren't these shocking things that struck fear into the enemy. If anything, tanks were far easier on the troops, as at least these enemies were easier to kill with artillery barrages, or even well placed explosives, when compared to the human waves.
@@IL0VEDUMPLINGSinsanity is something I would contend that someone with your propensity for all CAPS and poor grammar is unqualified to diagnose. Much less from a comment on a video. Especially since the actors' faces are conveying a look of terror in what the original commenter finds to be an amazing way.
Yup, that scene was amazing. They start shooting at the tanks from carbines... And nothing. Bullets just ricochet from armor...
Cannot believe how clear the footage from the early 1900s was made
Lmfao
This scene was INSANE
For anyone who's wondering, those are St Chammon tanks. They weren't the best at trench crossing but were very good at being moble long range artillery.
This! Was about to comment the model.
Saint-Chamond tanks (name of the city of productions)
Это мтлб , по каткам видно СССР лучше всех даже в кино😂
@@user-st5wz7fw6l What language is that, Arabic? Russian?
@@haydenbrewer4128 Russian uthi russky azyk MI ckoro pribem k tebe)
You have to imagine how confused and scared they were to see a rolling bunker towards them
When tanks were first introduced in 1916, German soldiers talked about how it was like metal alligators sliding through the mud. Although this scene is not the first introduction of tanks, it's still a very good scene
At least they on the outside and are able to destroy it, the crew of that tank are the ones who should be afraid, they know that the vehicle they're in doesn't have good fighting capabilities and they're rolling right towards the enemy lines, the tank has very thin armor too to the point where small arms fire can penatrate it.
@SlavaUkraini250 um what are you talking about the tank was built to withstand small arms fire all they could do was lob grenades into there hatches or shoot through the vents they (at least in this scene) had no weapons to delete it without killing themselves these steel behemoths were unstoppable without the correct weapons and no one did when they showed up and the weapons to kill them were few and far between in the later years
Tanks had been deployed long time ago before this movie takes place, all quiet on the western front happens weeks before the end of the Great War, while the first tanks had been deployed long ago already
@@mr.exodus3844You’re right it’s not the first time they were used in the war but it’s the first time THEY saw them.
The music in this bit (in the movie) was heart dropping and scary
The first use of tanks was at fleur corcelette france 1916, british mark 1 tanks, the tanks in the video are french and more likely 1917-18
I was going to say that as well, also tanks back then total arse they did not go very far before breaking down also terribly slow compared to the tanks the showed in the video
I was thinking it looked French too.
Not exactly historically accurate but I guess it looks better 😂
I was thinking the same thing. Being a landship nerd I was curious why they chose these over the British* ones then remembered, they are quite literally metal scrap piles barely functioning lol
@@hollowfied702Go like five meters and break down
You know when you're in trouble when the rats run away😂
😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
BRO WHY DID YOU HAVE TO SAY THAT THIS IS A TRUE MOVIE 😠😡
@@patrickracaza5680 what’s good man ? I don’t think he was being insulting in any way ?
@@patrickracaza5680no disrespect but if you ever see rats running like that and your best bet is to not find out why. Id be stting my pants.
Context of clip: this is taken from the ww1 film ‘All Quiet On The Western Front’ basically in this clip the Germans (soldiers eating) had just liberated a French trench and started eating their rations. And as you can see the tanks (French tanks) heard the Germans were attacking and stormed over the trenches crushing soldiers and shooting them with machine guns.
Liberated ?
About to find out what a trench sweeper really looks like
Its crazy how only 100 years ago this was what 18 to 25 year old men were doing.
Many were even younger as the governments used tactics to get people to join by painting the war as a french vacation, many lied about their age so kids ad young as 15 were getting mowed down in this war
Truly so sad
And some people be like “I was born in the wrong era”😥🙄
@@TY-fl9ulreal
and now still (Ukraine still uses trench warfare) given there trench systems are much more advanced but you get the point
"Why do i hear boss music?"
-Last words of two german WW1 soldiers.
Lmaoo
One German solider was going to die but was spared by the opposing team and in return became hitler
Not it's "vhy duh I ćear ze boss muzik"
@@obakengngoetjana6278his name was always hitler
in reality, those tanks are german, the soldiers were from uk
I don't think I've seen a less accurate depiction of WW1 anywhere, good job guys
Battlefield 1
This movie is generally accepted to be quite accurate as far as movies go. Obviously none are perfect.
I haven't yet seen it, but from what I've heard and seen of it, I'd like to.
Keep in mind the caption the uploader put on this video is indeed incorrect. This tank appears to be a late-war French design, certainly not the first tanks to be used in combat, as anyone knows.
Also they're in a recently captured French trench, which explains the relative abundance of food compared to what would have been expected to be seen in the average German or Austro-Hungarian trench by that point in the war, at least in my mind.
@@raiden0801the battlefield games are arcade shooters, they're close enough to be a lot of fun lol. Still miles ahead of any COD games. At least they have proper sized maps and servers 😅
Right, looks like BMP tracks and wheels😂
Imagine having everyone eating soup and bread in ww1 and you hear a tank
“Hanz, do you see that? Is that a bunker, in the middle of no mans land?”
“That’s stupid. Why would they..?”
“It’s moving towards us.”
that tiktok kills me lol
Imagine being in WW1 and you see giant pieces of metal rolling towards you slowly? I’d be terrified
Imagine their condition 😢
well that's the point of this lol
Graphics look good
And nothing you throw at it seems to have any effect.
Or as well the first time flamethrowers, toxic gas and landmines were used on the battlefield. Just the actual war on the battlefield made WW1 the worst that ever happened to soldiers. Of course every war is horrible but the amount of terror the soldiers had to feel was different that time.
It must have been teriffying. It is told that the most of the German Soldiers just gave up and ran away in fear as the tanks were approaching. Only few tried to fight them off with grenades.
Ww1:first tank
Ww2:first fighter plane
Ww3:...
Ww3 is nuclear war
WW1:first tank
WW2:first jet fighter
WW3:first nuclear war
WW1 had single seater fighters: The Fokker Dr1 (and others)
MEC suit
WWIII: First war in space
Out of all the WW1 movies this one is my favourite, I don’t speak German but watching it in German with English subtitles sounds better and just makes it feel more real
What's the name of the movie?
@@user-nj7er5zo1o all quiet on the western front !
The movie was disappointing. If the movie was named any else I would’ve liked it more.
@@davidred1809 to each their own ! Not everything is for everyone ! What’s your favourite ww movie ?
I agree!
I’m French and I watch the original version with subtitles
The soldiers in WW1 mutve really felt like it was the end of the world due to the amount of technological advancements... Fighter planes, tanks.. the war literally went from horses/muskets to modern war with machine guns, tanks and planes.
WW1 started with zeppelins aircraft armored vehicles and functional megazine weapons
@@mr.battledroid2195yeah but nothing like an armored bunker moving towards them and being x10 times stronger than all of these armored vehicles and zepelins
Aint no one using a musket in ww1
@@minotaurocurioso1756 no, it wasn’t 10x times stronger, a simple stielhand could destroy them, German troops were also equipped with portable cannons, and the idea of tanks existed before ww1
Muskets exited service in the 1870s. Horses were used even in ww2. Machine guns also existed long before the war started. War capable biplane already existed, guns began being mounted soon into the war.
That must have been a terrifying sight, to see a moving vehicle not knowing what it is, only see darkness a few seconds later…
"Hans why do i hear tractor noises?"
"worst way to start my day?.. probably burnt pancakes and bitter coffee.. how about you?"
" *28 tons of impenetrable metal moving towards my location.* "
@@rayhanrehemaputra1719OH stfu ain You gonna be The one to fight of entire armies in war so You have No Right to be talkin shit right now
Pearl harbor
And they're throwing gas.
ilike28
Impenetrable
Imagine, tanks are coming and you are shooting with the guns in your hand.
It was actually very common to rapid fire at enemy tanks even with small caliber rifles, although the possibility for doing damage was minimal it still had a great effect on the tank crew as the loud noise irritates and small metal pieces flew through the interior damaging equipment and crew. So it was not meant to penetrate the front armor, but to damage the guns, lenses and tracks of the tank.
@@AureliusOstard-rg6mqearly K bullets were effective against the earlier armor and using armor piercing bullets later developed for the machine guns helped when concentrating on a singular tank
Funnily enough, one of the first anti-tank rounds developed in WWI consisted of taking a standard rifle cartridge, and flipping the bullet around. Apparently smacking into the plate backside first helped it smash through.
@@chamberlane2899
What are the aerodynamics of a backwards bullet?
@@neilkurzman4907 depends on the velocity of the bullet (a typical rifle caliber bullet traveling at subsonic speeds would probably be more aerodynamic going backwards) but generally, assuming you’re using the same powder charge, pretty bad. This was not something you’d be using at any serious distance, and was more a stop gap solution while more dedicated anti-armor weapons/ammunition could be developed.
Imagine The Horror Those Soldiers Saw
If you've watched the movie, they were indeed awestruck at the sight of those tanks but what they were more concerned about was hundreds of infantry following behind those tanks.
You know it’s even worse for you when you see a metal behemoth coming with a cannon attached to it and thick armor
Edit: also what’s the music
They should've known, they had a room full of healing items.
O noooo
Naaah bro's triggered the boss battle
Underrated comment bro naaah
😂😂😂they should ve saved first
shit giving me diablo 3 ptsd
This is a real story :
Translated into English from a biography of a german soldier's book :
_September 15, 1916_
_This morning, we heard a dull and regular noise that came from no man's land. We thought it was the enemy artillery that was preparing to fire, but we did not see any projectiles whistling over our heads. We looked through the loopholes of our trenches, and we saw strange shapes that moved slowly towards us. They looked like iron boxes mounted on tracks, with cannons and machine guns that came out of all sides. We had never seen such war machines. We thought they were monsters sent by the devil to annihilate us._
_We opened fire with our rifles and machine guns, but the bullets bounced off the armor of the tanks without stopping them. Some were hit by our shells or were blocked by obstacles, but others continued their inexorable progress. They crossed our barbed wire as if nothing had happened, and reached our lines. They fired on our positions with incredible violence, wreaking havoc among our comrades. Some tried to flee, but they were mowed down by the machine guns. Others tried to defend themselves in hand-to-hand combat, but they were crushed under the tracks or pierced by the bayonets of the English infantrymen who followed the tanks._
_I was lucky enough to survive this massacre, by hiding in a shell hole. I saw a tank pass a few meters from me. It was painted brown and bore the number 705. It had a red cross on the side, which meant it was carrying wounded. It was escorted by two English soldiers who looked at me with contempt. I felt powerless and humiliated. I wondered how we could resist this new weapon that seemed invincible. I wondered if the war was lost for us..._
Nice
Wow
Can you please tell me the name of book
So the book name all quite on western front . Thanks to the comment replies appreciate your time
I don’t normally read comments but that is scary
@@lambsauce6585gave me chills
Imagine being the first enemy trooper to encounter this unknown fortress . Would've rumbled from a mile away.. shook the ground when closing.. insanely terrifying. Like trexes just entered war
Can you imagine how fucking ridiculous this must have been? Giant metal monsters shooting artillery shells and flames?
It's hard to imagine what those men went through in WWI. Must have been like hell on earth
Расскажите это тем кто пережил блокаду Ленинграда
@@IGoRek007It can be shitty for both groups of people.
@@devinvaldesalice7427its tipical russians
they just want to hear how best they are, praise them so that they leave you alone
@@sheina3372How right you are, these dogs just want praise, and if they praise another country they immediately cry
You didn’t even read history, because the Germans themselves got aggressive, but in World War 1 there were no such tanks anymore
This is definitely one of the saddest movies I’ve ever seen
Whats the name of the movie ( is it 1917)
@@ytubeuser2284 nope, All Quiet on the Western Front (2022). it’s German made, i highly recommend it.
@@ytubeuser2284 it’s called - All Quiet On The Western Front -
*Come and see*
@@ytubeuser2284All quiet on Western front realy recommend it
Its sad that the main character died in the last 30 seconds of the war
Worst of all, it was Black Adder’s last day before getting leave.
That must have been terrifying seeing everything shake
No when the rats run away you know something terrible is coming.
Не воюйте с Русскими❗☝️
All Quiet on the Western Front - 2022 Netflix Remake
Thanks
Thank you!
There's also an og one too! I can honestly without any ego or bias the remake is 10x better than the og and the og one is pretty good too! 👍 👌 you're all very welcome! By the way, thank you for all the likes as well!
thanks
The most realistic Netflix remake
Just imagine seeing a metal box that shoots literal missile and you only having a small gun
"There's no winners or losers in war. There's only survivors..."
You would hear the engine on those things well before it starts shaking your little table.
Perhaps their hearing has been somewhat affected by the constant explosions going on around them for 4 years.
Sound travels faster through the ground
Uh no. It’s creative license. A truck like sound would be coming your way with loud track noise
Easy to mistake it for some rumbling in the midst of war sounds
当時はエコテロリストの影響で、EV戦車しか使えませんでした。
"Hans, why is the bunker moving towards us?"
I don't know captain
"Gunther, is that a fast moving armored Howitzer with machine guns?"
@@Den_1ndo 🤣
"hey, remember that one guy back at Verdun talking about these big metal cars with guns the Brits sent at em? Panzern, I think he called them?"
Yes Panzern is right. That's a way to properly conjugate panzer for plural in german
Everybody's gangsta until the Level 150 spawns in a St Chamond
"Uhh Bob why is the bunker heading to us?"
-Famous Last Words
The thing is that the fear on their face after seeing a fucking 20 ton tank heading towards then and they don't know what it is capable of
It was even worse in WW2. Everything the allies thought they knew about armored warfare the Germans would just stampede right over them or make them suffer for every step they took towards them, there's documentaries about Sherman crew members hearing the Panthers high velocity rounds and then surviving penetration with the round ripping right out the other side completely and clean. And the real time PTSD Churchill and Stuart tankers had when going over a hill and seeing a tiger 1 for the first time reporting on the battlefield and seeing it sit there and just casually claim the lives of everything it's gun looked at. Tanks are no joke even if our anti tank tactics have evolved.
@@Texasmule we should be glad that they didn't mass product The Maus and they didn't build Ratte
@@bofh_fighter7268it would have ended the war much sooner if they did (for an even quicker allied victory). Those were more useless than anything.
The Germans were well aware of tanks at that point and knew what to do.
@@bofh_fighter7268Quit watching wehraboo shit the maus and ratte wouldn’t have mean anything grow up
rest in peace to all the men that lost there lives
Ей богу, иногда я задумываюсь, что было бы, если бы эти сотни миллионов молодых, здоровых, амбициозных мужчин и женщин не погибли бы на двух мировых войнах в интересах правящего класса, а занимались бы тем о чем мечтали. Наукой, искусством, философией, да просто бы были с семьёй и работали, жили своей маленькой тихой жизнью о которой многие мечтают.
Каким бы мог бы быть мир.
@@Sevas_Askinamen,man.
@@Sevas_Askinwar is inevitable
@@pndfarm2710 Under the capitalist formation, yes. As a Marxist, I have devoted quite a lot of time to studying the social mechanisms of this phenomenon. Hence, yes, imperialist wars are the inevitable companion of capitalism. And it doesn't matter, fascism, liberalism, social democracy. Liberal democracies fight well and a lot.
@@Sevas_Askinand comunistic russia is one of the most brutal and go to war coutries all allong with comunistic North Korei'a and few other comunistic places in azja.
Imagine being in a war with no end and after a long day you see a giant mass of metal coming your May with no way of stopping it
It was probably the best part of the movie
Just imagine actually being at the place the first tank was used in war. Thinking you’re winning a fight and out of nowhere the grounds shaking and a giant moving metal box with a tube coming out of it is coming towards you
First use of the tank was in the Somme in 1916. Not sure about the time in the movie - have read the novel, this scene did not happen.
Tanks were quite frightening when they first appeared although that fear was quickly dispelled when out of the initial 32, only about 8 actually reached the enemy line through mechanical failure, terrain and a mix of enemy artillery fire. Still a horrifying sight to see something like that inexorably walking towards you at walking pace while rifle rounds just bounce of it.
@@howardzhang5421en la pelicula estan en noviembre de 1918 debido a que trata sobre el final de la guerra
+ kulomety a zanima chlapy s plamenometem oni věděli že to je dělo a poznali že budou střílet když se tank zastavil
in the movie the tank is a snt chammond the french tank so its not the first appearance in war as the first tank built and used was british@@howardzhang5421
I remember being so confused about what they were looking at for a second then I realized what it was and even I got a little scared lmao
They knew what tanks were. They entered service in 1916 at the Somme. The first tanks were also british, not French. This title is inaccurate.
@@anothergermanmainNo and yes. Go further above the comment and there's a comment explaining it in detail. This is the first time these soldiers had seen a tank, and even if it wasn't, tanks weren't seen that often near the end.
@@zenithofeverythingTanks were used as break through tanks so no wonder. And the British were one of the Wide producers of tanks in WWl. And most of the time the Germans were fighting the French and British soldiers. And it took months to ship out tanks due to the extreme weight.
@@Jpz-4-5 Yup. I think modern media has made it seem like WW1 was filled to the brim with tanks. When in reality It was only during major battles and, like you said, breakthroughs.
@@zenithofeverything it’s really a shame. Soon the next generation will be told lies and propaganda to make the war efforts seem more appealing. Like America joining WWl to help. Hell no they only joined because France and Britain took loans from and if they were defeated there would be a lot of unpaid debt.
He’s just standing there
MENACINGLY
If anyone is wondering, no this is in fact not the first introduction of tanks, as the French and British had already been using tanks for the previous 2 years before this scene takes place. The Germans would’ve already had light mobile artillery and anti tank rifles rip to apart the counter attack.
The Brits invented the rank, and were the first to field them in combat. The first tank prototype was produced in England in 1915. I don’t consider DaVinci’s version to be a modern combat tank so does not count.
This movie was a real testament to how hard that war was.
Name ?
@@batuhansimsek1610all quiet on the western front, German made movie, on Netflix, about the Germans perspective during ww1 and how horrible war can be, absolute must watch
All Quiet on the Western Front
@@brodiegoodenough8412 The 1970's movie is a lot closer to the book, and the newest one gets so many things wrong, but it does capture the feeling better than the previous two movies of the book.
@@bigbrowntauhonestly all versions of the movie are pretty good, do wish it was a lil more accurate, but the acting was superb
Nah but can you imagine you’re in war and you see a big metal cart rolling slowly towards while launching missiles at you
Shells
nah both of them havent been used by tanks, they just use regular machine gun
@@revilsanjiani146no, there were called land ships for a fucking reason.
@@revilsanjiani146that French tank has a 75mm
@@sinabarzyar5766 wait what the french had missiles on ww1?? thats pretty cool ngl frfr
Tiger tanks came to mind. They're so cool and sturdy, man.
The first time i saw this in the movie i had shivers and a feeling of dread becuase i was really invested in what was happening.
14 year old self proclaimed “sigmas” when they get drafted to war and become disabled with PTSD instead of little dark age playing on a speaker
facts bruh, glad this movie did a good job of showing the brutality of war
@@antonypereira1098 Well, they did pick a good example. This was the war in which from onward war stopped being glorified
Of course it's like people forget the meaning of war and what a "sigma"is smh.Not saying none of them were "sigma" or even "alpha males" but it's just those words have lost their way sadly....😔
🤣
Seriously really is that music important in this situation?
“You can’t say civilisations don’t advance for in every war they kill you in a new way”
:Cod modern warfare remastered
albert einstein
That’s something I noticed in ever since war humanity advances in find new ways to kill people kids kinda cool in a twisted way
@@MasterTopHat but the technologies after those wars benefit us and inspire more great innovations for the public.
@@blizzard1198 which is also cool
Civilisations invented the Bow self-contained
Thats a miracle to me
A new era in warfare has begun...
Soldier: earthquake!
No man, battle formations!
Song: Kastro- In Essence (slowed)
Thanks
I thought it was officially used in movie man that music make that scene hell a magnificent
movie name ?@@boldstatus3568
Thanks for the help
Thanks bud 😢 👍
This movie should have won so many awards. What an heart wrenching movie.
What is the title
@@AngelGarcia-ls2fv all quiet on the western front
It got 4 oscars? Wdym
Real, everything everywhere all at once and this movie were definetely the best of the year
That must have seemed like machine monsters crawling over the fields to destroy you. That must have been horrifying.
Jimmy said it best. Their clients didn’t have much time left. They should have settled as soon as possible
probably the equivalent of us seeing a star destroyer sized space ship taking positions above our earth
Bruh 😂 Space Force is here to save the day
Sometimes I forget that human ingenuity is the most dangerous weapon we have.
only species that will destroy itself...
WW2 was whole different story
We got the Armoured Personal Carrier Germany, The first operational jet fighter He 178 {Germany}, The first Helicopter R-4 (USA), The first Assault Rifle STG-44 (Germany), The first Nuclear Weapon The Little boy and fat man (USA).
The Cold war is even more advanced
The development of the AK-47 (USSR), The first Attack Helicopter The Ah-1 Cobra (USA). Two Iconic helicopters the Bell Uh-1 Huey (USA) and Mil Mi-24 Crocodile (USSR).
Modern Times is way more advanced
The first Stealth Bomber (USA). The more weapons on The Tiger attack helicopter (Germany and france), The most advanced Stealth fighter The F-22 Raptor and F-35 Lighting
Ingenuity? No. Ingenuity isn’t dangerous. Greed and hate are dangerous.
@@SnailHatanWho do you think designed and built the tanks?
Ingenious scientists.
@@AmericansikkuntAnd who ordered those scientists an engineers to do so and for what reason?
A BMP-1 or 2 disguise as a ww1 french tank.
Saint chamond
Well, all remaining Saint-Chamonds are either out of commission or straight up museum pieces.
It's not like they had a choice XD.
Or they made a prop.
WW1: Hans, a riding bunker!
WW2: Li, a cloud in the shape of a mushroom!
WW3: Alexandrin, a flying tank!
just a big ass boat rolling towards you with a 100mm he cannon
75mm*
Also it would take it a while going 3mph.
They were actually officially called Landships.
HE cannon? The cannon doesn't determine and isn't limited to one type of ammunition, you know that, right?
@@excelsian512That is the only shells these things would be using because naval grade armor piercing shells are just going way far into the mud for anti-bunker operations
@@juskahusk2247mostly because they were developed by the royal navy so they were built much more like a ship then a big ass car
"We ain't had nothing but maggoty bread for three stinking days!"
Smiled at the quote
The Charlie's in the landship: "Look's like meats back in the menu"
@@onlyonecannoli7537 ".....boys"
The western front scene was horrifying dude.
One of the best war films i've ever watched.
The coldest scene in “all quiet on the western front” 🥶
Yo can you like my comment I want to watch this movie later but I'll forget the name
I think the scene with the corpse in the tree is colder
@@kylernoppen188 then write it down
@@deathtoweebs2725 huh what do you mean???
@@kylernoppen188 write down the name of the movie 🤦♂️
People 100 years ago: "In the future we will have a car with a shell shooter on it"
They did not know how strong and destructive a human is
In 2100 there will be mindless AI robots like the ones in star wars on the battlefront
The vibrating table is a sign something big is going to ruin their meal. 😂
When the baguette starts creeping towards you
There was no way they had that much food 😂
Germans just chilling meanwhile british invent some weird gun with wheels
Its a French Tank, its called the Saint Chamond
*tracks
@@ghosts2798 the british used the tank in combat first before the french
@@ghosts2798 funnily enough I think the prop teams had to use British ww1 tanks covered in the French tanks armour for this movie
@@VSS_GAMING_SHORTS actually yes, the british were the first, but here its a French Tank, search Saint Chamond Tanks
The first planes and tanks were for people who had not seen them, they were like a monster that makes loud sounds, i put their fear.
This is the French tank "Saint Chamonds"
Just gave me Battlefield 1 flashbacks 💀