SpaceX revealed New Generation Space Station Shocked NASA...!
Vložit
- čas přidán 1. 06. 2024
- SpaceX revealed New Generation Space Station Shocked NASA...!
======
1) 🎵 ABOUT ALL TRACK IN MY VIDEO 🎵
Far From Here GalaxyTones
The Doctor by Infraction
2) SOURCES OF IMAGES AND VIDEOS
Tony Bela : / infographictony
Owe @Bl3D_Eccentric: / bl3d_eccentric
Spacex 3D Creation Eccentric : t.co/QGbEwDwv7j
iamVisual: / @iamvisualvfx
velin3d: / velin3d
Tijn M: / @tijn_m
David Willis: / davidwillissls
DeepSpaceCourier: / @deepspacecourier4224
ErcX: / ercxspace
ErcX Space: / ercxspace
===========
SpaceX revealed New Generation Space Station Shocked NASA...!
SPACE, we know it continues to fascinate Mankind's smartest might!
This is why not only government space agencies but many many private companies have intensified exploration plans for this decade.
Most recently, SpaceX officially announced NEW Space Station - Vast Heaven 1!
This is truly fascinating like never before.
So, find out everything about this in today's episode of Alpha Tech:
SpaceX revealed New Generation Space Station Shocked NASA...!
NASA is faced with the problem of how to replace the International Space Station once it reaches the end of its operational life around 2030. Toward that end, the space agency has signed funded Space Act Agreements with three companies, Blue Origin, Northrop Grumman, and Voyager Space, to start design work on commercial space stations. NASA has made an agreement with a fourth company, Axiom Space, to install commercial modules on the ISS as a precursor to its own orbiting space facility.
But now a fifth company, called Vast, has stolen a march on its competitors, plans to launch a single-module commercial space station by August 2025.
SpaceX revealed New Generation Space Station Shocked NASA...!
When we hear the word “vacation” the first thing that pops up in our brains are probably sunny beaches with bikinis, glittering ski slopes, outstretched highways, or theme parks, right?
Have you ever thought about cosmic journeys, or vistas defined by the long arc of Earth’s surface? Sounds impossible, right?
But that might be a reality before we know it!
Sure… Mars or the moon would be pretty scary for us, but what if it's just in low orbit?
SpaceX revealed New Generation Space Station Shocked NASA...!
Well…. SpaceX is collaborating with NASA on an integrated low Earth orbit architecture to provide a growing portfolio of technology with near-term Dragon evolution and concurrent Starship development.
SpaceX revealed New Generation Space Station Shocked NASA...! - Věda a technologie
$2 million (per starship?) times 50 does NOT equal $1 billion. One of those numbers is wrong.
They forgot a zero on the 50
SpaceX will make a giant rotating station just like the 2001 movie. Artificial gravity will change space forever
With some kind of artificial gravity will allow humans to remain healthy while in space. there are all kinds of problems that pop up in the body, despite the lack of pressures, the human body is designed to need and use them.
@@bovinicusdivinicus is that why the Gray's look like that?
Artificial gravity is usually left out of the equation in many Space Habitat and Space Station videos and documentaries. All of the problems they have figured out some of the basics for are just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to maintaining good health in Space Habitats and Colonizing Planets like Mars. There are so many challenges to making dependable and operational Artificial Gravity Structures.
Is 0 times 0 still 0?
@@Ring0-- ask your moma
Has Blue Origin even put a single ship in orbit yet? Seems very premature to talk about them adding any value to this endeavor until they can at least do that. At the pace they are moving on Glenn they will be left earth bound forever.
the kid who can't do it, yet, and can't stand everybody else winning so he keep complaining and suing to be relevant. sounds a bit like donald
Blue Origin
Follow the money!
@@garrybisnath
That’s a completely immature response to a valid observation.
NASA put billions into Boeing who is proven, yet is now failing. It is logical to question awarding MORE money to Blue Origin who hasn’t accomplished anything yet.
There are dozens more startups that may benefit the USA more to support.
It’s not envy, it’s got nothing to do with us commenting being unable to do it and it’s got nothing to do with liking Bezo or not.
I don't dislike Bezos I think he should do more, like SpaceX. why he has to go sue every body@@whodatcatt
"Build it cheaper..." sounds like the Ocean Gate Motto.
Which is fine, when you are throwing up materials instead of people.
What vast industries need to do is they need to think in terms of quality rather than quantity instead of trying to proclaim their speed for coming up with a new space station they need to implement quality control procedures to make sure that once the space station is in orbit that it is safe and reputable reliable apparatus for future venues in space.
There is a certain elegance to mass production.
❤SpaceX
The only trouble with this approach is the lack of standardisation. We could have solved the range issue with electric cars if everyone agreed on a battery pack that can be switched out in a minute or two at a battery\fuel station. Like driving through a car wash. And then putting a charging rail down the central reservation of every highway For cars to hook onto. Also at the same time preventing habitual speeders. 😂. There is a commercial reason why this is not being done. So let's all let the "markets" destroy the planet instead shall we.
Awesome. 😀
Excellent stuff bro
Especially if you cut into the fuel storage areas then it is huge.
Absolutely right! Have been advocating for development of extra large manway covers to these tanks since landing one way Mars ships became a viable idea.
The day space is something to my societal class, it will be as transport to a mining, refining or other industrial job.
Starship will potentially cost $2M per launch not per craft. The craft itself will cost much much more
Yes, and that assumes all 42 engines are reusable. I predict that won’t happen.
@@whodatcattWhat is your evidence? SpaceX already reuses the Falcon 9 and now have a long and proven history of accomplishments.
I meant no offence to this channel. This was a great video as far as firing up the imagination and showing some ideas that might become reality one day. Good job Alpha Tech
It seems like Bigelow Aerospace picked the wrong time to cease operations. They already had test modules in orbit. It seems like they could have beaten everyone with huge volume inflatable modules.
Vast is smart to rely on Falcon launch vehicles, since there is no way to tell when Starship will be reliable as a launch vehicle.
It is nice to have lots of money to put into the project, but spaceflight operations can eat a LOT of money, very fast. No matter how much money you have, everything will turn on experienced expert personnel to design and build something reliable. We don't need another billionaire who doesn't know his new chosen field to create hardware to KILL people.
2 million per starship - 50 starships 1 billion, not sure how that works out unless you are incorporating the cost of super heavy into it, which would be reusable so not sure if thats quite the right calculation there chief
if you want NASA to build a new space station, they would insist on burning through 50 billion over ten years, and not have a thing to show for it!!!!
2mil to ride, not build... 350 people times 2 mil is 700mil. Already almost recouping the cost of building 50 starships. People would not be up there long before sent down and new people pay to come up.
You understand that there is a major design flaw associated with any space station that is a single long tube that rotates by itself, don't you? Once you spin up that long stick space station, since there isn't a counter rotation to cancel what happens naturally, in just a few minutes that rotation is going to catastrophically reverse and the station will flip end for end so that it ends by spinning the opposite direction. Well, a few of the pieces that survive will be spinning in that direction, most of it will just be more debris flying through space waiting for the planet's gravity to pull it back down to Earth.
11:30 into the program "$2 million (per starship?) times 50 does NOT equal $1 billion. One of those numbers is wrong"
"Without profit, vision has no value". -Grand Nagus of Ferranginar
Which rule of acquisition is this? Lol
The old space station has to have a sanitation update module and a H2O fresh water tank.
Go for the power, guarantee any orbit, within reason.
That’s crazy
For the Scott Manley and EA types among you, if we use a non-return Superheavy, with Raptor 3 engines, can we get an empty Starship to LEO? I.e., all of its internal volume available and customized as a space station?
Maybe
But if needing to do it often I’d think a better solution is available. Wasting a SuperHeavy will be expensive!
You could separate Starship from the portion remaining in space.
You could ferry the Starship engines back to earth.
But most likely the most cost effective method is to put purpose specific space station modules into Starship for deployment.
I would think that a Starship cut off where the cargo bay begins with the standard complement of engines with Starship flaps and Startiles on one side and across the top could be used to lauch a carbon fiber module with lots of docking ports and relatively large internal volume, partially fitted out so that it can "live" within the 100 ton limit of the normal Starship freight capacity. It can be finished out while in orbit with freight and people brought up by Starship and Dragon. A Dragon cargo vessel can dock to one end and provide propulsion as well as deliver some freight.
The second stage of the launch vehicle could be recovered as well as the first...
Why rotate Starships perpendicular to the center of the structure as seen in the video? Why not rotate Starships horizontally instead to have more constant gravity on a larger single surface area?
Because of the way the interiors will be laid out, of course. All the Starship's in this idea are also "lifeboats" and will be required to de orbit to bring crews back down.
Because the decks inside are vertical towards the point. Otherwise your argument is quite logical.
Have you seen the Ring Station builder being proposed by another company (voyager?)
I think the product of 2 million and 50 is 100 million? That's 'nothing'.
Vast has a good idea.
How about SpaceX get starship and HLS up and running first.
Should there not be a standard created for docking betweeen space ship and Space station. So all space ships should be able to dock with all stations. I think this is important, as it could assist space ships or space stations in trouble.
There will be a standard since everyone has to adapt to what spacex uses or they will be left behind
There is the International Docking System Standard that was put out there in 2010, and which I thought SpaceX followed...
The NASA Docking System is NASA's implementation of this standard; and the European Space Agency has the International Berthing and Docking Mechanism. Then there is the International Docking Adapter, for supporting Russian spacecraft.
For the love of all that is good... Do not let Jed McCaleb into space!
I applaud private industry taking the initiative in developing cis lunar industry
You won't be invited.
Lol at first I read private lunacy because of the placement of the words above each other.
Justin is sure that is racist. His goal is trans only.😮
Aside from content and production, both excellent, I really love the fact that from a non american point of view, you sound very much like Casey Kasem. ..... or Shaggy. it takes me back a few years.
When we are finnally allowed to use the now 100+ year old gravity drive technology, allowing space craft to be built here on earth and launched without the use of rockets to orbit
big dome window paying customers it's not made of carbon fiber is it (so where have i heard that before)
I don't know where you're getting your $2 million four starship but the vehicle WILL cost 40 to 60 million to construct. Engines alone are $250,000 each.
Based on the fact that Axiom is already cutting metal for *their* orbital module(s), I'm guessing that the best that these folks will be able to manage by the time Axiom starts putting things on orbit will be...half-Vast. :)
That said, I'm happy to see multiple efforts to create orbital infrastructure, however long it takes and however many iterations they have to go through. This is, after all...rocket science.
Great point
I *_saw_* what you there...
Sounds awesome, but consider me dubious. I'm in my 50s, and I've heard "This will bring the cost down to space. Making it affordable for the average person." all my life. Even my favorite company SpaceX, which could have lowered costs for customers already hasn't done it yet. Not as much as they could. Oh, I'm sure at some point in the not-so-distant future it'll get there, but I'm not sure I'll see it in my lifetime. I plan on sticking around for a few more decades. Time will tell, at any rate. It'll be out of reach for an old fart like me by that time. That I'm sure of.
Why would they lower costs when they are pretty much the cheapest to get to space and are continuing to upgrade and develop tech. Lowering costs will just slow that progress.
@@NavyVet4955 of course that's true, but if you're going to tout $2 kg to space so the average man can afford it they're going to need to prove it. Also, that's for mature tech. They are still very much still in the developmental stage. I'm just saying, put your money where your mouth is and demonstrate it's truly feasible. $55 million a seat on Dragon. Holy S#%T! I'm not great at math but that's gonna be way more than $2 a kg I mean how heavy are these astronauts? The average person will be able to afford a ticket, right!!!
@@StEvEn-dp1ri you think it’s just the astronauts that go up? There is cargo as well on each of those flights. Again they are far cheaper than others and are still developing tech that no one else has successfully used. Yeah BO can land their stuff but have yet to orbit it and have been developing it for longer than SpaceX. Stop crying that it’s not cheap enough for you to use and just be glad someone is working on that direction.
its going to happen, they already working on engines that are 2-3x more fuel efficient and more powerful then current ones. Apparently it uses controlled continuous explosions to create thrust, and since explosions have a higher speed then burning it generates way more thrust.
@@songhan1586 I'd love to see it man.
Math check: About 11 minutes in, you reference the cost of a StarShip as super affordablecat $2 million each. But then that 50 starship would be $1 billion. $100 million ($2 M times 50). What are the correct values: $20 M each or $100M total?
looks like the Titan Submersible lol same size looking too
Vacuum is much easier to engineer for than the pressures of the deep ocean.
11:30. 1Starship=2million. So 50 Starships will cost 100 million. Not 1 Billion. Typo?
Merry-go-round sleep capsules then you at least still get 8hrs and can still do zero-gravity manufacturing.
Blue Origin's design philosophy? As phallic as possible.
Aerodynamic are a thing. Rockets have had the same shape for decades more or less. BO is that shape because they have f**ked the tax payer and investors.
Hevan 1 High Entry vehicle and number.
VAST... If you can't trust a Bit Coin developer, then who can you trust?
build a runway on the moon
Boeing should also use there own money 💰 that way they can get it right. For there rockets 🚀 or even space 🚉
hope they have a "coupon day" for us poor people to go up there
🤣
And this is why everything you buy is priced so high to live in this economy.
Yo forget Begalow hotels
and start the voyage to Mars with one of those space stations with a booster place in the appropriate spot in the center do you get it moving. Towards the end of the travels gradually reduce spin to accommodate lesser gravity. Maybe in the last month even Jewish we can drop it although if we kept it at Warren G people would come out with superhuman strength on the red planet it will get so much more done for the first couple weeks!
At 11:30 into the video there is some odd accounting. Each Starship would cost only $2 million? Yeah... there are fairies at the bottom my garden too! And when I first learned simple arithmetic, 50 x 2 million was 100 million, not 1 billion!
Well done them. They are using a proven rocket and capsule to get them into orbit. Then designing the habitat modules. These have been designed before so it's not new tech
They havent come far since the man in the can of the 1960's... we have gone from tuna cans to juice cans.
I wanna see something that has some forward planning to it, thats a small piece of something bigger, and when the bigger thingie is finished its totally fricking awesome.
Not things that need a baby bottle nipple on them and look like space advertisement props...
Why are all the Space Nerds "Tube Heads"?
Doesnt have to be tube shaped to launch... could be a sphere, or a hex box, or a Saucer shape on edge... I suggest the designers live in a tube for a couple years or so, and then try a Yurt shape and do sanity tests in both.
Gawd! I will be glad when common man can get past the Nerds in Space, and everybody can be creative!
🤨🤦
I’d rather see space exploration developed with commercial money, not tax payers. Does the public see a direct return on their investment? Military projects should be developed with their budget, not shared with NASA’s budget.
"HAVEN" not "HEAVEN". You had one job...!
Why not just launch a bunch of rockets then use the fuel tanks as station modules. Then most of your rocket is the payload.
The wet space station concept was looked at in the mid-1960s, for the Apollo Applications Program. The amount of effort to carry out the conversion in low Earth orbit was eventually viewed as too burdensome (now by then NASA was facing a trend of budget cuts).
@michaeldunne338 Consider the activities deemed crazy or near impossible in the 1960s which are now sports. Our perspective on possible has evolved dramatically.
In the 1960s, a small group of engineers turned bureaucrats decided it'd be too hard. We now have millions of people who are engaging in these conversations every single day, and have access to modeling and computing capabilities far beyond the imagination of Gene Roddenberry himself. We have invented and proven technologies unimagined in the 60s which would make the conversion process orders of magnitude easier than originally considered.
One example: the inflatable structures being considered for habs in orbit, on the moon or on Mars. The structures inside a SH booster can be made removable rather than fully welded. It would be awkward to disconnect the support structure, but once disconnected, the "guts" of the booster can be pulled out and stationed alongside the shell. The inflatable structures can be used to seal both ends of the booster shell, and the interior of the shell can be partially pressurized. One of the hardest things about working in vacuum is how stiff the suits become thanks to the pressure differential. As the pressure approaches equity, a lot of the stiffness goes away. A huge number of tasks could be performed in the "corked" and easily uncorked/recorked booster shell. Large sections of the tank and rocket structures can be detached from the main and then pulled into the low pressure differential workspace to be worked on for reuse or preparation for burn up. An added benefit is that the amount of potential debris is cut to a near-zero amount.
gateway spaceport is far better
Who wants to go to space and do nothing maybe look at the earth a bit. If I go to space I am helping out with the effort however I can even if I have to volunteer my services as a maid or cement worker or robot operator will be great but not doing
nothing is no fun participating in the build effort
Billions? Why not say Trillions? 😂😂😂😂
Seems like it would solve a lot of problems if we put a space station half way to mars
Free market zealots remember none of this happens without tax dollars.
Where does all their poo go?
I know you'll be SHOCKED to learn this... but having every title be SHOCKING is a major turn off to potential viewers... I think it is time to apply a cattleprod to the people who write your headlines and SHOCK them out of this inane habit.
ELECTRICALLY YOURS
An insulated former viewer.
Imagine the c02 footprint with increased space flights. 😂😂😂😂 Where is the climate alarmist’s outrage.
Space X revealed another NEW obsolete generation of useless crap, which we didn’t need since 50s, that’s when gravity control have been mastered.
This channel used to be a dude talking about space stuff. Now it sounds like it's literally scripted by a bot or chatgpt. See ya'll later, I'm out.
Talk is cheap, let's see something working .......in are life time....😁🤣😁