Structure of diamond

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 11. 09. 2024
  • Structure of diamond

Komentáře • 47

  • @KanishVlogz
    @KanishVlogz Před 6 lety +20

    Teaching cannot get better than this.

  • @shikhartaori895
    @shikhartaori895 Před 4 lety +4

    charan kha h aapke...shat shat naman h aapko....what a teacher you are....hats off

  • @atoz7388
    @atoz7388 Před 4 lety +5

    Thank you sir for this painful and patientful job

  • @chandruk3232
    @chandruk3232 Před 4 lety +4

    Thank u so much sir its very very useful for my seminar

  • @SudhanshuKumar-gg4tq
    @SudhanshuKumar-gg4tq Před 3 lety

    I am very grateful to you sir. Your way of explaining things is extremely simple and easily understandable. I feel like touching your feet sir. Great great great video

  • @nishthagupta7660
    @nishthagupta7660 Před 6 lety +6

    very nice explanation.

  • @alijafari6933
    @alijafari6933 Před 4 lety +4

    thanks for teaching....

  • @gucheq
    @gucheq Před 4 lety +2

    really awesome

  • @OmarFaruk-mj2xv
    @OmarFaruk-mj2xv Před 2 lety

    thank you, professor. Your explanations are just amazing.

  • @AnuvabAhmedApurno
    @AnuvabAhmedApurno Před 4 lety +2

    Awesome explanation. But in Europe, we call them basis not motif. Basis is the international representation.

  • @user-gu1qx9bo3s
    @user-gu1qx9bo3s Před 5 lety +6

    Thank you so much.

  • @lisajose9219
    @lisajose9219 Před 4 lety +1

    Nice .Thank u

  • @pranav9339
    @pranav9339 Před 2 lety +1

    Prof, are these lectures on crystallography enough to get started with superconductivity?

    • @introductiontomaterialsscience
      @introductiontomaterialsscience  Před 2 lety

      It depends upon how much crystallography you need for your problem. What I have taught here is basic crystallography.

  • @mr.kaustubh
    @mr.kaustubh Před 4 lety +1

    sir please tell me in different allotropes of carbon which structure forms which kind of voids(octahedral,tetrahedral)??

  • @nainijain1431
    @nainijain1431 Před 4 lety +1

    thus this motif is same as basis or not..
    very helpful video thanks sir...

  • @lohxueqi8365
    @lohxueqi8365 Před 3 lety

    Prof, hi. Why we consider firstly diamond as FCC ?

  • @promilasingh9351
    @promilasingh9351 Před 4 lety +1

    👍

  • @pulkitmahera4543
    @pulkitmahera4543 Před 4 lety +1

    How can a carbon atom fit inside the void when maximum size of atom that can fit inside it is 0.225 r

    • @rajeshprasadlectures
      @rajeshprasadlectures Před 4 lety +3

      The maximum size of 0.225 r allows the four souurounding atoms to touch each other. In diamond they do not touch and are separated. Only the central atom touches these four atoms.

  • @sahilmasih8366
    @sahilmasih8366 Před 4 lety

    How many corners does a diamond have??

  • @sahilrajeshgajbhiye4968

    Ty very much sir

  • @aniketsaha7455
    @aniketsaha7455 Před 6 lety +1

    Even in Streetman(Solid state electronic devices) it is written as diamond cubic lattice...

    • @introductiontomaterialsscience
      @introductiontomaterialsscience  Před 6 lety +7

      I hope you agree with me that it is an incorrect usage.

    • @DileepKumar-ng8ys
      @DileepKumar-ng8ys Před 3 lety

      @@introductiontomaterialsscience Sir please explain how to write motif or basis, it is confusing 🤦🏼‍♂️

  • @Arjun-zk2kf
    @Arjun-zk2kf Před 3 lety

    Very helpful !

  • @suryaprakashgoud6498
    @suryaprakashgoud6498 Před 6 lety +2

    About Diamond cubic crystal: sir, can we say like this "some of Carbon atoms have occupied tetrahydral void spaces" in fcc.
    Pls. Give some reference if psbl. of "lattice points" arrangement of diamond.
    Not cubic structure or tetrahydral structure.

    • @introductiontomaterialsscience
      @introductiontomaterialsscience  Před 6 lety +7

      Location wise yes. The four atoms inside the unit cell located at the body diagonal of the cube are located at the sites of tetrahedral voids in CCP structure. But two things should be noted. First, only half the voids are occupied. And second, the atom in the void is of the same size as the atoms defining the void.

    • @madhusudanbhide3293
      @madhusudanbhide3293 Před 6 lety +1

      Surya Prakash Goud !

    • @lokeshverma5902
      @lokeshverma5902 Před 4 lety +1

      @@introductiontomaterialsscience is this the same structure that we obtain in zinc blende structure (disregard the size difference of cations and anions )?

    • @avi123
      @avi123 Před 4 lety

      The atoms occupy only the upright tetrahedron voids.

    • @adarshranjan6181
      @adarshranjan6181 Před 4 lety

      Sir, why is diamond cubic structure not included in bravais lattice?

  • @fizamalik20233
    @fizamalik20233 Před 5 lety +1

    what does it mean by two interpenetrating fcc make a diamond lattice?

    • @rajeshprasad101
      @rajeshprasad101 Před 5 lety +2

      If you take the corner atoms and the face entering atoms of all the unit cells (ignoring the 4 inside atoms sitting on the body diagonals) their centres form an FCC lattice. Now if you consider the 4 inside atoms of all the unit cells, their centres also form an FCC lattice. The two FCC lattices are shifted by a/4 along a body diagonal.

    • @kaushik8318
      @kaushik8318 Před 5 lety

      @@rajeshprasad101 thank you very much sir, superb explanation.

  • @Upgradezz
    @Upgradezz Před 3 lety +1

    Thank you

  • @kishore5199
    @kishore5199 Před 3 lety

    Respected Sir,
    Kindly share if you have done any videos about the packing factor of diamond. Also it would be nice to know a general correlation between atomic packing factor and hardness of different material.

    • @rajeshprasad101
      @rajeshprasad101 Před 3 lety +1

      I do not think there will be any direct relation between hardness and packing factor. Diamond is an example. It is one of the hardest materials but its packing fraction (0.34) is only half of that of a monatomic bcc crystal (0.68).

    • @kishore5199
      @kishore5199 Před 3 lety

      @@rajeshprasad101 Respected Sir,
      Thank you very much for the reply.