Hi Marcus, your Tort videos have been so much help! Recently I have been struggling with Tort but these videos help out a lot! Thank you so much! Also, how would you answer a problem question on causation and duty of care etc? Keep up the good work!!
+S Shad Hmm good question. Focus on establishing the duty of care between the claimant and defendant first of all and then ask yourself would the accident have happened 'but for' the actions of the defendant. Don't forget remoteness too!
Is the description for the Greg v Scott case correct? I believed that the case involved someone who had a delayed diagnosis of cancer and no operation was involved. Can you please clarify?
this is so useful.. I have my tort law module for uni in January and preparing for it with your videos are helping my understand so many things. Do you have any further reading/article suggestions for Tort Law generally?? Thank you!! :)
Hello Marcus, thanks for your informative videos. I’m a mature OU student second year law, have finished contract (just about) and now tort. I’m struggling really struggling.. Any other videos you could recommend?
Hey Marcus. I have a question, ‘A mechanical application of the strict rules of causation (the ‘but for’ test) would produce unjust results.’ Discuss. How would I answer this question, I have watched your videos on causation, looked at my textbook, but don't seem to be able to answer this question. Could you help me out?
This guy is helping us make it through torts
I loved when you called pushing a person while someone is ducked behind them "the classic prank". Too funny.
mate you are a legend
Hi Marcus, your Tort videos have been so much help! Recently I have been struggling with Tort but these videos help out a lot! Thank you so much! Also, how would you answer a problem question on causation and duty of care etc? Keep up the good work!!
+S Shad Hmm good question. Focus on establishing the duty of care between the claimant and defendant first of all and then ask yourself would the accident have happened 'but for' the actions of the defendant. Don't forget remoteness too!
hi m I m very happy and satisfied with all your video. it's all are helpful great helpful
Thank you so much!! :)
Fantastic! Keep up the good work, mate.
Is the description for the Greg v Scott case correct? I believed that the case involved someone who had a delayed diagnosis of cancer and no operation was involved. Can you please clarify?
Please upload more Marcus. Really missing your inputs.
More coming soon!
@@marcuscleaver glad to hear!
You should write a fucking book bro. Thanks for the help and great content. Will definitely like and recommend your lectures.
this is so useful.. I have my tort law module for uni in January and preparing for it with your videos are helping my understand so many things. Do you have any further reading/article suggestions for Tort Law generally?? Thank you!! :)
Is there an authority for “on the balance of probabilities?” How did that come about?
Thanks for this helpful video.
P.s Is this video enough to cover the whole of Causation for Tort examination?
Take a look at remoteness too (that's technically called legal causation)
contracted dermatitis or lung disease for McGhee?
Hello Marcus, thanks for your informative videos. I’m a mature OU student second year law, have finished contract (just about) and now tort. I’m struggling really struggling..
Any other videos you could recommend?
Can you do a video on breach of duty please?
Hey Marcus. I have a question, ‘A mechanical application of the strict rules of causation (the ‘but for’ test) would produce unjust results.’ Discuss. How would I answer this question, I have watched your videos on causation, looked at my textbook, but don't seem to be able to answer this question. Could you help me out?
I got you bro. Will reply to your email in a bit.
marcuscleaver Thanks bro.
@@marcuscleaver can you email me this too?
What about self-imposed harm Calvert v William Hill?
i love you marcus
Every other source says he developed dermatitis
What was A doing crouched on the pavement 😂
He's in on the prank with the dude pushing! I went to an all boys school, people played that prank on each other all the time =/
Hiya mate, just to say I think you've got Gregg wrong. That's not what the facts were