Lunar rocks and the flat earth
Vložit
- čas přidán 7. 06. 2022
- @Ripple.US. of the Flat Earth Institute of Science and Moon landing denier believes the moon landings are fake because of reasons and some bits of black rock. Oh dear!
Lunar sample info courtesy Walter Bislin - walter.bislins.ch
The lunar sample building at Johnson Space Center is the chief
repository for the Apollo samples. It was constructed to provide
permanent storage of the lunar sample collection in a physically secure
and non-contaminating environment. NASA provides lunar rock, soil, and
regolith-core samples for both destructive and non-destructive analysis
in pursuit of new scientific knowledge.
curator.jsc.nasa.gov/lunar/in...
Investigate the sample compendium with scientific papers about
uncountable samples of lunar rocks:
curator.jsc.nasa.gov/lunar/ls...
----------------------------------------
#LunarRock #MoonLandings #Apollo
Donate via Willow: wlo.link/@MrSensible
Support on Patreon: / mrsensible
Membership: czcams.com/channels/PKx.html...
Follow on twitter: @ItsMrSensible
Contact on Discord: / discord
Please subscribe and be Sensible!
Stay Sensible
--------------------------------------------------------
Additional Music & Sound:
www.bensound.com
www.zapsplat.com
www.purple-planet.com
Someone should tell Kyle that the moon rock is black because it came from the dark side of the moon. 🤪
And he would be dumb enough to believe it.
I mean, seems obvious to me.
Or perhaps it only glows white when the area of the moon where it originated is lit?
@@theturtlemoves3014
Quantum entanglement!
That makes so much sense! lol
It don’t need a reason, its quantum.
Does Kyle not realize, that using photographs of the lunar surface as evidence that these rocks didn't originate from the moon and simultaneously claiming the whole moon landing was fake, renders his whole argument completely useless??
Exactly. If no-one went to the moon, then where did those moon photos come from?
🤣😂🤣 priceless! These guys are so stupid
He is a flatearther. Don’t expect logical thinking.
@@betaorionis2164 or ANY thinking. We all know thinking is not their strong suit.
Well, the contention is that if the Goodwill Rocks can't be matched to any Apollo photograph or footage, then the whole program is bogus. Those rocks are of Earth origin.
Congratulations to Kyle for being able to identify coloured rocks in a black and white photo.
@Kyle Adams You do realize they used both color and black and white film, right?
As Rob Skiba pointed out: I left this world. Did not make it to the moon, but you can't win them all.
Kyle looked at some images of moon rocks, compared their relative colour to that of photos taken on the moon and, without any knowledge of geology or where exactly these rocks came from and why they were chosen, made the well-educated statement _"It is more than evident that not a single one of those moonrocks actually came from the moon"._ (5:00)
Then, feeling confident after that, he followed it up with _"Which is more than enough of a reason to suspect that we never went to the moon in the first place."_
Flat Earth research at its finest: I looked at some pictures today. Decided I didn't quite like them, so I chucked all of known science out of the window.
At least Kyle did not say that the moon was fake
Typical flerf research method.
_"I looked... I didn't like... I chucked..."_
Kyle's method of _Putting Your World to the Test,_ means judging it against the flerf narrative
Yup, photos taken before colour photographs were even a thing.
You can't get any more stupid than that
Gotta lie to flerf.
Kyle's kids should just option the rights to their life story right now.
"My dad was a flat earther"
They are flerfettes themselves!
1:45 Kyle lies to us on a regular basis. His fantasies can't exist without his lies. Despite a pretense of being nice, Kyle is NOT a good person.
Agreed.
Agreed x2
x3
x4
Nobody is truly a good person, there's those of us that try to be a good person and fail, and there's those that don't even try to be a good person while lying to themselves that they are the best person to ever exist.
The presentations of official Moon rock included the national flag of the recipient that is stated to have been taken in the Command and Service Module (spacecraft America) to the Moon and back. The official Moon rock samples handed out were encased. The first card presented with each Moon rock & flag states specifically the rock is a Moon rock. None of that matches the petrified wood & card. But as it seems to support Kyle's chosen conclusion Kyle ignores that. Kyle says he can't see black rocks in the images he looked at so there can't have been any so they are fake so the whole Apollo program is fake. I checked the archive on Flickr and found the source set for the composite wide view Kyle showed - Apollo 17 colour magazine 137/C. That includes rocks with a distinct blue tinge, and some "soil" with a distinct orange tinge. By Kyle's logic they shouldn't be there but they are.
In frame AS17-137-20955 we can see the Lunar Rover out of focus with the Sun light glaring off the "fenders" so strongly they look white instead of red, and the "fender" in shadow is so dark it just looks black.
So, let me get this right .The USA spends Billions of dollars faking the Moon landings and then it sends the Netherlands a souvenir piece of Moon rock that not even a rock and hopes that nobody will notice,...right!!!
No, they send a loop[y ambassador, And he was not the first loopy one.
Ah yes, but you see, nobody noticed until the great and wise Kyle Adams of the Flat Earth Institute of Science revealed the truth!!! So their pernicious scheme almost worked due to our shear stupidity.
I studied Planetary Geology at Uni, and can confirm that the lunar rock samples in thin section are completely different to the freshest basalt samples from Earth (from Hawaii). They are also different from the examples of moon rock that we have as meteorites, which have obviously been subjected to the influence of passage through the atmosphere.
I have had several arguments over the years with moon landing deniers. Not yet had the *hem* pleasure of discussion with a flat earther.
One of the more "interesting" aspects of this entire fake moonrock charade is the fact that it was on display in the Rijksmuseum. The Rijksmuseum is not a science museum, or a geology museum or even a natural history museum; the Rijksmuseum is an ART MUSEUM, just like the The National Gallery of Art in Washington or the National Gallery in London. So with that in mind it's not particularly surprising that the curators did not recognize that it was a piece of fossilized wood.
There is no chain of evidence leading from NASA to the alleged moonrock being on display in the Rijksmuseum. Everything points to a mistake, or to a hoax orchestrated by two Dutch artists in a 2006 art exhibition.
In addition there is no evidence that the card displayed with it is in any way related to the alleged moonrock. Moonrock is not mentioned on the card at all.
and possible source of that red rock is much older that 2006 hoax - it dates back to august 1969 and don't have any connection to NASA, but only to another dutch artist
Maybe the Flat Earth Institute of Science does not have an Astronomy department. If they had then "Professor" Kyle would have been told by them that there are some rather dark patches on Luna which we call Mare. The landing site of Apollo 17, the Taurus-Littrow valley, is located in Mare Serenitatis... so it is not really surprising that they recovered a relatively dark-looking chunk of rock from a relatively dark region of Luna.
Be careful telling them that Lunar areas are called Mare, as this is Latin for Sea they will be telling us that we can't see any water on the moon. 😀😀
Well, they were seas of molten rock.
Well they certainly don't have geology, illumination or photography departments either.
Kyle should have checked with an expert in stones - Roger from Mudfuzzy Unevercetty ….
@@treadingtheboards2875 Indeed. The astronauts should have been wearing bathing trunks, not space suits.
Does Kyle know they took 15,000 pictures on the Apollo missions? Did he go through them all looking for black rocks? I doubt it.
A good excuse for that is that NASA destroyed them all, according to flat earth conspiracy theories.🙄
An old rule of thumb for getting correct exposure when taking a photo is the “sunny f/16” rule. If the weather is sunny, you set the camera to f/16, and the shutter speed to 1/ISO of the film or sensor (1/ASA for the older photographers) and you get a good exposure. Ansel Adams quoted this rule in at least one of his books.
If you take a photo of the moon using the sunny f/16 rule, in the resulting picture, the moon looks dark grey (from personal experience).
If you see the photo taken from space of the Earth with the sunlit moon in front of it, correctly exposed for the Earth, then the moon also looks dark grey.
Perhaps the moon is actually dark grey, and only looks bright when sunlit in contrast with the blackness of space?
Just a thought…
It's green - and made of cheese. I'd have thought that Mr Sensible, of all people, would have known that!
Ahh Kyle, the master of personal incredulity
"The Flat Earth Institute of Science"? isn't that a contradiction in terms.
Kyle type thinking, "Oh look, the clouds look like lumps of cotton wool, so clouds must be made of cotton wool"
Ouch, that hurt thinking at that level.
Exactly! "Science" means "knowledge" and flatearthers have next to nothing of that.
Logic is a b*tch, ain't it Kyle?
Claiming that nobody can go to the moon, simply because that would undermine your beliefs about a domed flat Earth, does not constitute proof that going to the moon is impossible. Considering that Flat Earthers have no model to explain how the moon’s apparent angular size remains the same between rising and setting, it is clear that the moon must be a great distance away, as well as being very large. This observation simply couldn’t happen, if the moon had been close and small.
"But muh NASA projection!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
@@ReValveiT_01 Yeah, it's a NASA projection that's been going on for the whole of recorded history 🚀🪐
Look, obviously the moon we see in the sky is just CGI, projected against the dome of the heavens...
@@RichWoods23 And the moon is lit, appropriately, by the Illuminati 🤣 NASA have been projecting the moon, since 4,000 BC...or is that BBC? 🤣
The flat earth Institute of Science sounds like it should be a Monty Python sketch
Kyle has rocks in his head.
and it's not moon rocks for sure
And zero brains.
Are you sure that it's rocks and not a brown something squishy and smelly ?
@@Kualinar Hard to tell until someone takes a sample out
@@casperhansen826 lol yeah black rock
The improvised yodeling was a nice touch. Too bad @SciManDan doesn't do them anymore.....
Worth noting that the Dutch petrified wood was in an ART museum. Not a lot of geologists typically in an art museum. Also worth noting that it would have been given to a private citizen (which was never done) when the royal family of the same country got nothing, and would have been given during a time when no rocks were being given out.
Plus the fact that moon rock was so valuable, no one is going to hand out a large chunk worth millions, to a relatively unimportant person
on top of that the actual good will rock samples were in the National Museum of the History of Science and Medicine in Leiden, Netherlands. I get a kick out of it when flat earthers still try to use this claim as proof against the moon landing etc.
I have a pepple and rocky beach near me, from just a couple of hundred meters or so away it just looks grey. But get up close it's full different coloured rocks, though the predominant colour is light grey. And in the mid day sun in the height of summer, you have to get very close to pick out the colours. And that is after the suns light as been filtered through our atmosphere. So it's really not that difficult to work out why the moon surface looks grey is it? And with regards to the supposed moon rock that turned out to be a bit of petrified wood, did it not occur to this guy that this one sample was presented totally different to all the other moon rocks? The fact that it's not set in plastic clear plastic, plus the plaque is totally different to every other moon rock given out at the time? I guess it was just more convenient for this guy to just ignore that little fact.
Please don't tell me he's using the petrified wood one again?
Just goes to show that he's as disingenuous as any other flerf, he just sounds a bit more polite about it. Anyone still using this argument knows exactly what they are doing. And what they are doing is flat out lying.
Kyle doesn’t get that rocks from the same body can be different colours. He has as much understanding of geology is as he has of the rest of science and physics. None whatsoever, I hope Kyle has a meeting with Buzz Aldrin’s fist like the denier who dared to desired it and confront him.
The moon has an albedo of only 0.12, so it really is quite dark.
Hello Kyle. We should talk.
It makes a change from "If the moon is made of dark rock then why does it look white?"
I'll tell ya why... the moon is made of dark rocks and dark things absorb white light. Once the rock absorbs all the light it can it reflects the rest back into space and quite alot of it makes it way back to earth as white light, thats why the moon looks gray/white.... hows that for an explanation ?? ;)
Poor Kyle. He didn't spot the obvious. The black rock was taken from the craters that were in shadow, like many shown on his picture examples.
The image show at [4:36] for about 8 seconds shows a very large rock, with an astronaut to the left and the lunar rover on the right. But if you go to the Apollo Lunar Surface Journal site and get the high resolution image, you can zoom in on an area on the plain above the gap between rock and rover. Look carefully, and there's a small object with sharply defined shadows. It's the Lunar Module. ("Always remember where you parked!")
I'll dig up the actual photo filename and post it here as soon as I can.
www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/images/610213main_S73-22871_full.jpg
Or search for "610213main_S73-22871_full.jpg".
I had a talk with Kyle about this rocks. I sent him some links about lunar Breccia, a rock that can look pretty black and glassy. There was even photos of where they got it and a complete analysis. He kept calling them obsidian and got no source for it. Its Breccia Kyle! He stoped replying after that.
Rock on the Moon are bleached on the surface by direct solar UV radiation. But inside them they retain the original colors. For example basalts tend to be blackish wherever they have been formed.
"The Flat Earth Institute of Science"!?
Is it just me and can EVERYBODY see the contradiction and absurdity in that?
You don't even need to read further than the third word to see the absurdity.
Only flattards do not see the absurdity because they are too dumb to see that the terms "flat earth" and "science" are mutually exclusive. You can have one or the other but not both.
An oxymoron if ever there was one.
Still waiting for a piece of Da Dome. With full documentation of course...
So the 'Flat Earth Institute of Science' is just one silly flerf? Not very impressive.
But he has a BIG but very flat brain ….
And he calls himself "professor"!
None of the others are allowed in because he's the only one who could spell 'science' correctly.
Kyle completely fails to do the most basic fact checking or research before jumping to false conclusions and inserting incredulity so he can pretend it somehow reinforces his false beliefs. It's pretty sad. In the meantime that petrified tree sample at the beginning turned out to be completely wrong. It was not an apollo sample as it was found in a drawer lose and there was a card found in the same drawer. Someone jumped to a false conclusion not realizing that the moon rock samples were very small and encased in acrylic. In the meantime the actual sample that was given to them is indeed small, encased in acrylic, and still attached to the plaque. You can find both the apollo 11 and the apollo 17 good will rocks in the National Museum of the History of Science and Medicine in Leiden, Netherlands.
I'd like to point out that the picture of Nixon with a lunar sample display was a lunar sample from Apollo 11 while all the close up examples in the videos are from Apollo 17.
Also, the petrified wood looks nothing like either of the lunar display samples presented to the Netherlands (pictures on this page: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_lunar_sample_displays).
Personal incredulity is not evidence.
Someone should tell Kyle that incredulity is not an argument.
Oh right, he's already been told, a million times.
Poor Kyle. As shoddy as ever.
Something about Kyle's "politeness" makes me loathe him more than the rest of the Flerfs. He knows he's lying, and he just plays Mr. Nice Guy (looking for some "common ground") and it just seems slimy to me. Probably just my opinion...
I have the same opinion.
3:58 lol that was hilarious and of course you followed it up with the yodeler @ 7:35 bravo!
The yodeling song that sciman Dan (amongst others) used is a very nice touch.
Flat Earth Institute of Science....now there's an oxymoron for you.
Remove the "oxy" and that's a perfect description of Kyle.
Oxen and morons are offended to being compared to Dishonest Kyle. Yeah, oxen might not realize that "oxymoron" doesn't have anything to do with them, but they still don't want to be compared to Dishonest Kyle.
Oxygen: "Um...we don't want to be compared to that idiot either."
Yep, there's no science in the flat earth religion, and there's no flat earth fantasy in science.
Would this be the same Rob Skiba that claimed the 'Rona was a hoax? How did that one work out for him?
In the art and antiques trade businesses, there is such a thing as “Provenance;” which is a detailed, documentary history of a work or art, from its origin, to its current status and location. In this regard, there is more detailed and accurate “Provenance” of the moon rocks having come from the moon, than the Mona Lisa having been painted by DaVinci. Every second of the Apollo missions, from the early planning stages, the engineering and development of hardware, computer programs, telemetry and communications data is, not only recorded; but also verified by (Literally) dozens of corroborating sources. So much so, that (To quote a National Geographic documentary) “Considering the time effort and resources required to have faked the (Moon landings), it would have been easier and cheaper just to go to moon.”
4:11 He would get there in the first place. Space programs tend to forgo any dead weight they can avoid. But we should fund his trip. Because they would leave without him for sure.
And, on second thought, he is already there, as he lives behind the moon.
"Do they think they just burned out as soon as they left the moon?" This says it all. The poor schmuck is still under the impression that the moon glows with its own light, therefore a dark rock can't be from the moon. No, Cuddles, you are the one that thinks the moon is a big night light.
So some Joe with no education or skills wants to tell me that a rock is fake and because of that we didn't go to the moon and he wants me to believe him. Who is he kidding? That would make me a bigger numpty than he is. I'll go with Mr Sensible. He opens a world of learning and exciting discoveries.
It doesnt take a rocket-scientist, he says. What about a rock-scientist?
Nope, cant use those. They know too much.
@6:35
Who knew that moon meteorites had cute little faces!
It's adorable! Forget about moon rocks being fake, why weren't we told that the Man in the Moon had lovely little moonchildren!?
3:24 No, but in my experience being a politician indicates that.
If a politician opens his (/her) mouth (s)he is about to lie, and when the mouth is closed gain (s)he has told a lie.
I've actually helped a part of a lunar meteorite when at the keldier observatory last October. As well as a iron meteorite that was dated older than the earth,
As well as looking at a very small peace of a mars meteorite.
They do lots of different events later in the year la guides into astrophotography, nights talking about the night sky and getting to look through their very nice telescopes weather permitting,
Where they are is also Europes biggest protect dark skys location,
I just went to Jism's channel and suggested an experiment to "prove the flat earth once and for all." I suggested that "we" could prove the flat earth by setting up and showing several Foucault pendulums around the world all turn exactly the same. Which of course they don't because we're on a spinning ball. It will be "interesting" to see if Jism falls for it.
Kyle is such a special little huckleberry.
In fact they make a point to look for some of the more unusual rocks. I had the opportunity to talk with James Irwin. He was talking to me about a very unusual Rock he spotted on one of his moonwalks that he named The Genesis Rock. He specifically went for that rock because it was so unusual.
Minor clarification, Mr. Sensible: *Washington University* in St. Louis, _Missouri,_ USA, is not Washington _State_ University, because, well, it's not in the State of Washington. (And you're definitely neither the first, nor last, to mix that up.)
I reslised my slip of the tongue after upload. I knew someone would spot it!!!
@@MrSensibleHistoric No worries, sir! We all make little mistakes. It's the ones who promote falsehoods as a regular thing that we need to take to task. 🙂
Flat earth institute of science should win an award for most oxymoronic name that exists
@Mr Sensible I take issue with your contention that all the colour would be leached out by the amount of light. There are plenty of moon images with colour. The astronauts were well trained in getting the correct exposure while using their lunar Hasselblads. If the colour was washed out by excessive exposure then so would all the detail in the image. Besides we all know that the moon is made of cheese. 😁
It was a monochrome photo.
@@dogwalker666 or was it just a black and white photo 📸 🤔😊
@@dogwalker666 He was talking about colour. And I don't think it was specifically that image.
Of course, those eminent scientists Wallace and Grommit went there and brought back samples… unfortunately these samples are no longer available for study as they were eaten. Apparently Wendsleydale is much better. Obviously he has never heard the recordings Harrison Schmitt made from the lunar surface, to say he was just a tad excited is rather an understatement.
A mysterious piece of Red Leicester.
Craig & Mr Sensible: This is a FIRST time EVER I heard of a public national space agency/agencies doing copyright strikes against video and/or audio of the space station. I swear I am having a Mandela Effect moment. Did I just imagine the HUNDREDS of times I have seen and heard video from the space station on hundreds of different channels, both educational and conspiratorial, in the past, with NO copyright strike problems and no fears of copyright strikes?
I believe NASA footage is copyright free. However...
1. That footage may have been via another TV program or channel which don't allow it - we would only find out if they made a claim
2. It is Craig's channel so that HAS to be his choice.
Cheers
S
His argument about the red color of the petrified wood debunks his claim. All other Moon Rocks collected by the Astronauts were the color seen and expected as in the photos of the Lunar surface.
Considering the Albedo of the moon, that rock has just the right colour.
Nicely done MrS. :)
From what I understand, Lunar regolith is actually a fairly dark grey, close to asphalt in color. The Moon seems much lighter in the sky basically because a lot of light comes from a relatively small point, so all the light is kind of accumulated; it looks darker up close.
EDIT: I guess these rocks aren't actually regolith though anyway.
Good job exposing a very weak conspiracy meme 👏 I had come across the dutch fossilised wood example before and it doesn't stack up compared to the other documented goodwill rocks.
The Black moon rocks we have on Earth were selected and picked up from the shadows on the moon because all the samples that were in sunlight are white or grey?
I like how Kyle makes sure only comments he likes is shown with the "convient" excuse that if you wanna argue what I have to say go to the debate board.... Kyle doesn't want any type of truly public scrutiny of ehat he says he'd rather it be on his debate board nobody goes to.
But he has no problem coming and spewing his nonsense under other people's videos. He's a hypocrite.
Yup, and he's the first to cry "flat earth is being censored" in debates. Gotta hypocrite to flerf.
IF you were going to fake it why would you chose a black rock?
Basalt tend to be black or dark gray.
Kyle: 0 | Mr.S yodelling: 1
There are thousands of peer reviewed scientific papers on the samples collected by the Apollo missions. Kyle has not addressed them.
He rejects all of it as "Trust me bro statements" in one fell swoop!
these days Kyle just reminds me of "People of Walmart"
By all accounts, the 'moon rock' given to the Netherlands wasn't given by Nixon but by the ambassador, and the PM had been retired for 11 years (www[dot]moonhoaxdebunked[dot]com). Allegedly, the two had a personal friendship and it was not unknown for them to exchange joke presents (citation needed)
If the goodwill rocks threw ya, I suppose the orange silicate soils that Harrison Schmidt found would really wedge your underoos!
Flat earth institute of science? Perfect example of the meaning of *_Oxymoron_* . 🖖 👌
I didn't know Flat Earth had an Institute of Science!
I really can’t wait for when we go to the moon again. It will send flerfers into an apoplectic frenzy that should be a sight to see!
They'll just call it another lie. That's all.
Thank you.
Great work Mr S but I think Dan's yodellers have the edge! lol
Watch it! :-)
Oh no, I know that voice.
The Yodeling..... Make is stop!
Here's to all those who have a sample of Moon rock in their geode collections!
Awesome video! And I'm so jealous of your piece of moon rock!
Xmas present from my daughters.
He said something about, "when they took the rock from the moon, it stopped glowing, did it burn out when they took it off the moon." (around the 1;50-2;30 mark)
The only takeaway I get from that is, he also believes that the moon emits light, otherwise the rock wouldn't have "burned out" or otherwise stopped glowing. So, his ignorance is monumental. It's not a little stupidity, it's a grand structure the size of a Dyson sphere.
Flat Earth Institute of Science =.
Some guys basement at his mommy’s house
1) encasing in acrylic may cause effect similar to wetting. Wet stone may look quite different when compared to very same rock in dry condition
2) i've done some research (hehe) and have found possible (VERY POSSIBLE!!!) source of that mysterious petrified wood red stone. Sadly, my video (in two parts) is on Russian, but youtube autotranslate may give you some glimpse: 5N0UvY_3L_I and JZxrB_DHe50
"The Flat Earth Institute Of Science" 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Damn it, Mr Sensible!!! Give us a warning before you mention them. I piss myself laughing every time I hear that phrase. Now I've got to take a shower and put on clean clothes. Maybe next time you can give us a clue - "nappy time" will do.😃
Don't be fooled by the rocks Mr Sensible has got. He's still , he's still Sensi from the block.
Isn't this the guy that threw the gauntlet down awhile back?
Yes indeed!
Could the oxygen and the atmosphere on Earth change the colour of the rock in any way? 🤔
Volcanic glass is the amorphous product of rapidly cooling magma. Like all types of glass, it is a state of matter intermediate between the closely packed, highly ordered array of a crystal and the highly disordered array of liquid.
and still n0 testable prediction from flat Earthers. So sad.
Great job dubbing yourself yodeling with yourself! . . . and all the rest of what you did to make this debunk possible.
Thanks! I am a yodelling choir! Lol
Wow. Mr. S. Harmony! Not bad. Needs some tenor and baritone, but good on ya!!
Lol
Flat Earth Institute of "Science"?...wow...
Guess this shows Kyle is a bit Looney
That man is welcome to visit Sweden and I can take him to a part of Stockholm where there is a esker (formation from the iseage), that esker have stones that look light on the outside but are darker on the inside, not as drastic as a flint (stone), but still show how it can be possible to find a dark rock on a natural geological formation with lighter stones. This is due to erosion from wind, rain and the sun that affect the surface.
It is like those folk that believe in stupid shit just ignore what they can see in the nature, like they never been on a stone beach with a hammer and try to crack some rocks and to see that some look a bit different on the inside, it is like they can see but not observe.
He would definately rise the average Swedish IQ....
Love from Norway....
@@Lassisvulgaris I see what you did there. SHAME ON YOU! But keep up the rivalry!
@@theultimatereductionist7592 Sorry, just couldn't resist.....
“Flat Earth institute of science” ROFLMMFAO.
No, the moon is not white. It is rather dark, like tarmak. And is covered by a lot of dust, from all the craters.
C'mon, Mr. Cheese... Get You a moon boulder! lol 😺
I think you could have done this better. You leave the impression that the moon is white but there are some black rocks. Truth is that the moon isn't white, its patchy dark gray overall. The photos from the surface in color show this well against items that have color.
The Moon rock I saw at The Franklin Institute in 1970 is still on display there, and it's greyish-black. It was retrieved on the Apollo 11 mission. Sorry, I don't buy this flerfy yawp.