Who were the first Americans?
Vložit
- čas přidán 9. 05. 2019
- Thanks for watching the video!!!!!
I hope you subscribe to join the Squad!
Make sure to comment new video ideas below!
SUBSCRIBE, LIKE, SHARE, COMMENT!!!
**********************************
Music I used:
(May not post it here just comment and tell me!)
***********************************
Sources:
www.geek.com/news/15600-year-...
www.smithsonianmag.com/scienc...
www.bbc.com/earth/story/201703...
www.nytimes.com/2017/04/26/sc...
www.bbc.com/news/science-envi...
www.iflscience.com/editors-bl...
www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/d...
www.washingtonpost.com/news/s...
***********************************
Contact me! If you have something to tell me comment below or hit up my social media!
Instagram: Haven't made one yet sry
Email: North02bank@gmail.com
***********************************
Credits: Just me, one guy, it is hard to make a lot of content!
Much of this information is outdated or not entirely true, a new video may need to be made.
Please do.
I really appreciate that you go back to your old videos and leave these comments as new evidence is discovered.
Definitely. White Sands footprints, if nothing else.
It’s crazy how much better at videos, mostly the narration, you have gotten in just 2 years of this channel. Keep up the growth homie!
"The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence"
- Ed the third -
i love how more footprints were discovered in new Mexico like 22,000 years ago
The first people in America came 30,000+ years ago
They are big foot tracks.
The crossing is believed to have happened from around 30 thousand years ago onwards.
@@Green.P3there are bones that are 50,000 years old how can we come from that early age? If the bones prove it wrong!😭😭😭!
Great job. I’m binging all your videos.
Really well done.
It’s is so fun watching you learn and grow with both knowledge and video skills.
I’m loving it
Your channel is underrated. So entertaining!!
Thats how truth is few ever pay attention to it.
Thank you for this! I have to study on this topic!
Great video! Just what I wanted.
Thanks for watching!!! I am glad you like it.
When I was a kid in the 50's, it was still controversial to speak of Man developing in Africa. Also, anyone who dared to say that man came to NA before 10,000 yrs ago was a lunatic. Not only those points, but public science was still believing in Mars as being habitable and only scientists who were invested in the space program doubted that. Though without evidence to back it up.
So much changed in the next 20 years, and continued to change over the past 50 years. There is much to discover about US and our planet. There is a need to be skeptical, but not STUPID!! :D
Thank you for sharing sir, it stirred up a side of wonder in me. Just the change in the past 30 years is baffling
You all aren't going back far enough...
More and more people are awaking up to the lies, lies that paint your race as contributors to society and who are equal to other races. Don't worry. Within a decade or so, people will realize that black history is a lie made to make your race feel better and your so called inventions were made by other races.
How so?
@@Jaggerbush Ask yourself that!
Very cool that you were so far past "Clovis First" 3 years ago. I think a sequel to this video is about due as discoveries keep pushing the timeline further back. In particular recent fossils strongly suggesting Homo Erectus was to some degree seafaring. I have always found the assumption that our ancestors walked everywhere unimaginative since a boat is a much shorter jump in creativity then a wheel or domesticated pack animals.
Is making videos about all these topics just a hobby for you? Or have you studied this stuff, I love them btw ( :
Fascinating regarding the macedon bones! Thankyou,
If there were an ancient hominid in the americas pre homo sapien then it would fit my hypothesis that “wild man” stories (Sasquatch, Almas, Orang Pendik, Yeti) are a cultural memory of non-sapien homo species interacting with Homo sapiens.
It’s possible, if not unlikely. If homo erectus or another none sapien species followed a similar method of crossing into America as we did (ae on the coast or a glacial corridor). They could have had us beat by hundreds of thousands of years. They’d certainly thrive in the North American environments as well as else where on the planet. But a main reason I think this isn’t the case is because of the lack of genetic data. We would find some DNA markers that Homo sapiens would have gained as they intermixed with these hypothetical American populations. I’m sure we would recognize them as human enough to interact and interbreed with. Even if we killed them off like we did other species we’d still have some trace of them in the Native American genome.
@@theluftwaffle1 Such a statement has some weaknesses. 1. Yeti or big foot is described as a big hominid. Bigger than as at least. Yet old homo species weren't that big.
2. Clovis people used sofisticated tools and survival techniques to get trough Beringia and further to the south. Primitive old homo species lacked such skills.
3. 130 thousands years ago means us or the denisovians.
Make a part two :)
*cough*
Archaeologists in Argentina recently found 40.000 years old human remains in Catamarca province. Please check it out
All I have to say is gods damn Jeremy soul is the greatest artist ever
Thanks a lot
You almost lost me in the 1st couple of minutes with your focus on "the men" ... but I stayed. Nice video, nice summary of facts :-)
in 2021 - human footprints discovered in White Sands Natl Park New Mexico - have been dated to about 21-23,000 years ago - they were dated using seeds found in the stratigraphy
The meadow Croft rock shelter in Pennsylvanian is believed to of been continually inhabited for almost 20,000 years
Respect for the Skyrim music, damn now you make me want to play it.
What about us filipinas?
Now I want to play my boyfriends game Oblivion.
I think there was something about the Clovis people were wiped out by an asteroid inpact. Or, some kind of Tunguska event . . . larger than Tunguska actually, but still not quite an impact - kind of interesting.
@Davis Edison ; Look up the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis.
fascinating can you do a video like this except focusing on native Australians ???? these kinds of videos are like crack to me lol
This would be great as there are still people who know the stories of their ancestors, as well as the rock art, sadly a lot of this hasn’t been maintained since us whities turned up. 👍
Native Australians were most likely Homo Erectus populations & later Denisovans. People came from every direction, just boat along the shore from Europe or from the Pacific islands & you are in the Americas. Clovis first is just wrong!
Along with your unattributed "the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" (probably William Wrigt, 19th century), you might add to your repertoire: "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." (Attributed to Carl Sagan, but the idea dates back at least to Jefferson.)
The diehard defense of the Clovis First folks was that there wasn't enough evidence to indicate people in this hemisphere earlier: this was proven false primarily by the eventual discovery of LOTS of such evidence -- but also (as you note) the presence of a human footprint in Chlle, both earlier and quite far away from the Clovis First folks' evidence.
"The great tragedy of Science is the slaying of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact." Thomas Huxley
But the 130 kya mastodon bones at Cerruti aren't quite like that Chilean footprint, dated 15.6 kya. Just the fact that it IS a human footprint (and that old) indicates the Clovis first theory is wrong -- even though one possible explanation is that people came down the coast further (and earlier). The find can MODIFY the Clovis First theory (as some of those folks have tried), but the weight of other evidence has driven Clovis First beyond recovery.
well no doubt the first 'Mericans came from Asia. I'm 60% European / 40% Native American. On my mum's side you can clearly see the high cheekbones, darker skin, less facial hair on her side of the family, while on my dad's its just the opposite.
My cousins from Mexico are blonde hair/green eyed Basque Kelts! Anyway my DNA was traced to NW Spain/SW France AND from the plains of Central Asia! Interesting stuff!
@Giovanni Balbosa-Mc Intosh ahhh... yes thats where the 60% comes in???
@Giovanni Balbosa-Mc Intosh ahh, thats what I said
My old European comes from mainly Denmark , Bulgae, Celts and Franks, but, I have genes from Central Asia and Siberia, too.
My whopping 1% Native is Eastern Sioux, from Virginia.
@@melissagerber7231 kool
Denisovans in the americas before us?!? Wow now thats amazing
This is why we need to be much more careful about applying labels like "First Nations" and so forth. Chances are extremely good that the so-called FN groups are just the most recent cultures to have overrun the previous groups of occupants. Even the term 'Native Americans' is problematic -:it's not as if they sprouted from the soul, the NA groups just moved in here like everyone else.
In time, our modern notions about these peoples will prove just as antiquated and confused as those of previous centuries.
Who did they over run?
@@macarde10 the mammoths
Clovis people crossed over the Atlantic from Northwestern Europe. Clovis arrow and spear heads ate similar to those in Western Europe made by Cromagnon, no similar heads found in Asia
North 02 have you heard anything about the indigenous peoples of South America having genomes that are related to the Aboriginal people of Australia, but the people of North America don’t?Graham Hancock mentioned it.
Sorry I made this comment before I watched the whole video.
Terminator pig is at 5:00. A very cool 6 min. if you have the time. Interesting.
May have come, not may have came. Came is the past tense, but not the past participle (which goes with auxiliary verb “to have”).
Well, not _anything_ is possible. 😉 There weren't any aliens involved, for instance. 😄 But this was well done, covering not just what is known to be almost certainly true, but what could be true if newer evidence turns out to be accurate, too. Well done!
That would go to Amerindians
So you live in Alaska?
List of people that discovered America,
NorthEasternAsians:~35000-15000BC(debated)
Vikings: ~1000
Polynesians:~1200
Columbus:1492
Didn’t the sammi discover the scanadanivia
You know your science.
yesss
Is that music from Skyrim?
😊
One thing who i dont understand is How this "peacefull" people who come by bering strait become so brutal like astecs or another south American natives who pratice sacrifice rituals and canibalism like in ancient Brazil 1400-1500s when portuguese and spanish arive , the tribes tupi-guarani have a common cultural canibalism of eat their enemy to become more powerfull and Brave , this us dont see to much in North American natives before colonialism.. its a Crazy fact who always i think what these people sufer to become so brutal at this point ..
Cultural choices.
Yes, some tribes and empires were brutal but that can be said of any peoples from the rest of the world. The Spaniards were no saints and enslaved indigenous people and plundered their gold. They burned the Maya library. Humanity is really quite different than animals in this way.
@@redpilled9454 The only exception I can think of is the Indus Valley civilization. They apparently didn’t use any weapons nor waged war. Now this may change or simply be proven untrue.
The answer is simple…it’s religion.
If the Clovis people crossed the artic land bridge show me one spear point from the area. They don't exist.
So I’m here for soc science
Wow
And then came the Solutreans around 24.000 years ago......:)
czcams.com/video/rZrXQy2tJDw/video.html
Red Indian...
Stephan Milo's take on archaic humans in the Americas makes me more skeptical. It would be cool, but the evidence is just not there yet.
This video is old and probably not that good haha, I definitely need to make an update since a lot of evidence has changed
JUNIOR...... never say never ! yes you are much better... thky dan t.
No one, The IQ test has been a bad one, We've always been here LMAO native Americans weren't neither native or American
Wrong. Humans never originated in the America’s
What are you talking about Austin? Could you elaborate further?
Are you suggesting that the cradle of humanity was in the Anericas? Because if yes, than you would be laughed at!
Would be amazing if like erectus was here, maybe he adapted to have hair and big feet 😆😆
We came out of genesee river Newyork the oldest tribes
Every new thing seems great. But, as old as friendship is
Yes, the better and stronger. - Aristotle.
Americas reached by:
A) Beringia
B) Oceania
C) both?
I liked the way you batted down the--to me--nonsensical theories of EVEN. Will go back to watching the rest of this video. (BTW, Cordillera is pronounced core-dee-YAIR-ah. It's Spanish.)
Could denisovans have originated in usa
There are more Denisovan genes in South America, the ONA tribes of Argentine Patagonia have the most in the Americas, however they are outnumbered in Southeast Asia and Oceania with even higher amounts of Denisovan DNA. Answer: Nobody knows, but it seems that Denisovan genes are widespread in Asia and the Americas
Great vids. But wow this guy North is so unpleasent to people commenting..
Did they have domestic k-9's and had them pulling sleds ? Then they wouldn't need an ice free corridor they would need snow and ice to travel on !
O:56....please note that the “men” who crossed to the Americas were also women ...and children!
men can aslo just mean human in broder contex
And again “would have broken”, not “would have broke”. Broke=past tense. Broken=past participle.
Hominid is not human so as many others hominids species maybe got extinct so the theory of Bering or Clovis are still in the game.
What if those mastodons were butchered by Bigfoot🤔
This continent didn’t have a name and there were no countries here back then
Grammar check your work. "May have came"?
During the ice age there were people, which were from northern Asia
Pima land North Asia theafs ants have Pima mole like the people Pima mole left side spine
The theory in regards to a pacific origin don’t match up with the time period of which austronesian (pacific Islander and most south East Asians) expansion occurred, the linguistic links also don’t exist with the shared genes likely occurring relatively recently via trade routes from eastern Polynesia
When people migrated to USA there was big land connected Alaska to Russia which time by time collapsed and you can only see under water now, first people moved here Asians , they moved from North America to South America population was big . There was already back and forward movement from America to Europe, Christofor Columb did not find this land which was already well known place . Made up histories are just simply shit , You need to learn how land has been changed last few hundred years and you’ll get an idea
Great videos, it would be nice if you included the wording women when you describe peoples and not just “these men”
Why even inflict gender norms, “these were the first people in the America’s”.
Why does it matter. They are people. Quit with your "woman can do everything men can do" bullshit!!!!!! Quit watching mainstream media and thinking your some kind of victim..........it's obvious you just watched a while video on the history of the "people" of America yet you see only the fact he said men and not "woman"!!!!!! Hahahahahhahahahahahha lesbian
Ha ha , you said “homo”
T
Could have ridden, not could have rode.
People always inhabited America before any migrations
Yeah Amerindians did, if you gonna bring up the African stuff up in here vulture then I suggest you go on your own lane, because this has nothing to do with your people.
Humans were placed
It's Bigfoot!!
So basically no one really knows who was in the Americas first.
Asians
Asians
@Jonathan Cruz69 Asians
@Jonathan Cruz69 you're Hispanic. Hispanics consists of a lot of different nations, so saying they are your ancestors of Asians is big stretch. I'm Native American so it may not be much of a stretch for myself but you, maybe.
@Wet Mustard Oh I forgot you were there. smh
So the first americans were the ancestors of native americans that live in America today?
Yes
Who did these first Americans kick out? Truth is … we really do not know…
the continents were uninhabited by other homo sapiens
Animals, they extincted a bunch of megafauna.
@@cezar211091no they didn’t 😭💀, many of the horses and other animales died off due too the earth warming up, search it up.
Dude you mentioned a highly competitive landscape, if they where first who did they compete with, let me help you, AFRICANS
He was likely referring to the various megafauna. Not sure what ur on about
nah africans had there own big ass content that they where barley exploring at the same time so no
@@dotdotdotdotdotdotdottod they were Africans tho
@@EternalEmperorofZakuul "were" past tense my dude
@@dotdotdotdotdotdotdottod my mistake.. There were Africans tho
America is a Continent not a Country. There is not a Country named America. United states people call themselves Americans. Anybody born in the American continent is an American. From Argentina to Canada
I dont think argentinians or canadians consider themselves Americans
@Giovanni Balbosa-Mc Intosh Yup. Those are continents. If you were on the moon and asked a stranger where they were from, they wouldnt say north or south america. Canadians would say Canada. Argentinians would say Argentina. Americans would say America. And everyone would understand what they meant.
@@MH-ro1lg but that’s as silly as calling Chinese, Asians while ignoring all the continent
Sure people get the point, but it’s not totally okay
No, they call themselves Argentino, Mexicano, etc. Get real.
who were the first americans
Northeast Asians
Or oceanic people
Amerigo Vespucci
Finally someone that brings up the fact that there is evidence of much older civilizations.
I don't think it is ridiculous to think we have been here 100,000 years ago. You are using the same Clovis First logic.
I would recommend the book "America Before" by Graham Hancock.
Oh dear...
oh dear... watch my video on human origins to get a accurate picture of our human story. I respect graham hancock and I have listened to a lot of his work but he is a bit of a conspiracy theorist. There was no great lost civilization during the late pleistocene. Humans didn't begin to start great civilizations until about 8,000 years ago. You might say "but, Gobekli Tepe!" Gobekli tepe is not anything near the size and prowess of late mega structures. Homo-sapiens were still in Africa 100,000 years ago and all over the world were other hominids that were not capable of even forming civilizations.
Graham Hancock is dubious source at best
@@NORTH02 This comment shows your true ignorance on the subject.
Where is my ignorance? tell rather than trying to play the "woke" person in this argument.
Siberians
Some of the first Americans were European in origin too.
Not at all. Can you cite the studies which support your ideas?
@@macarde10 his claim is like trying to say Africans colonized the Americas.
@@entity6609 Africans were in the America’s though
@@macarde10 czcams.com/video/rZrXQy2tJDw/video.html
Caucasians from Europe. Same as the Bask and Celtic people
maybe in your Eurocentric fanfiction
They were White/Caucasian/Caucasoid
There are multiple sites in the 'lower 48' and even much further south that are thousands of years older than Clovis. Read James Adavasio's book, "Strangers in a new Land". If you really are a paleo-aficionado, you know that. Unless you're just reading this stuff out of a book to make a CZcams channel.
This video is outdated, I was ignorant and working with old evidence, but still land bride was the wya the natives got here
George, I think many archaeologists have long suspected an earlier date for humans in the Americas. However we need actual evidence based on science and or just conjecture. What is clear, is that today’s native Americans show a direct relation to the oldest of human remains in the Americas. It also seems evident that Native American genetics show a relation to each other, throughout the Americas.
@@macarde10 I do not question Asian origins. I do question Clovis first. There's a CONFIRMED 18,000 YO site a couple hours drive from me. Clovis was definitely not the first Americans. Lots of confirmed evidence out there, if you keep up with your reading.
@@georgepretnick4460 perhaps read what I said. Again the majority of archaeologist have long suspected an earlier date for the arrivals of people in the Americas. Considering it was once thought that people had on out arrived 5000 years ago. Things do change. However, science doesn’t happen over night. And the majority of these older sites, can be contested. Ultimately more work is needed for it to become crystal clear to all, how far back people need to push the arrival of humans into the Americas.
@@macarde10 There will never be a finite date for the first human foot on the Americas. Crystal clarity with total agreement is a fool's pursuit. Archaeologists perpetuate their livelihood by being in constant disagreement.
🦖🖤🐌🖤🦖
Look Pima ant Pawnee apache Cherokee puma ants here North Asia the ground i walk on Lord Adam Pima God's first people pharaoh stole from Goshen California
The first Americans were red headed giants, before the Clovis people crossed through Alaska and moved south killing off the remaining giants that survived the ice age and taking their land.
Proff of evidence please???
Umm ..no
@@adolforuiz6031well there were giants here lol, yet I think he is talking about the Inuit poeple because there were already millions of people living here 😭!
There were no Denisovans, nor any other king of bipedal hominoids in the Americas (maybe Bigfoot).
how do you know?
Im adam DAS Pima moglee Cain Alladan Joseph pharaoh Achilles Ishmael Moses Isaiah Gidian Jesus Christ im DAS again yaw yaw yaw
Not blacks that for sure
No shit 😂
I don't think they were brutal I think they just over hunted and didn't realize what they were doing humans are the most destroying a destructive animal that ever lived on this planet my ancestors didn't do any better they're all to blame
No way they ate them all. Just a changing environment
Why do you keep saying MEN. I’m pretty sure men alone didn’t populate the Americas.
He means MEN as in MANKIND. Humanity in general
Native americans have always been in the americas. The bering straight is 1/8th the population the rest is purely native outta the soil.
You are crazy if you think that is true.
@@NORTH02 theres anthropology and facts and evidence for this it is True.
@@yaruqadishi8326 Makes sense. The Bible and many other ancient cultures claim the natives were created from the ground. Florida to South America were originally West African lands(before the continents separated). Which explains the phenotype of the oldest skull found in the Americas(Luzia Woman), and the lack of transatlantic SLAVE SHIP evidence.
@@NORTH02 calling someone crazy and not following up with substantial evidence is crazy.
@@yaruqadishi8326 were is your evidence for the “Theory”
I guess you forgot Neanderthals
There is not evidence that Neanderthals entered the americas. It is a fun idea but at the moment it is not scientifically supported.
Why there are different human colors ?
How about coming from Europe across the Atlantic Ocean?
There isn't any evidence to indicate that. Thanks for watching!
I read in a textbook that that might have been possible, probably not for many at all though. Wonder if it’s true
That would be Columbus and he fucked everything up
@@avery5471 Sorry, by the time the late comer Columbus arrived, the Vikings were already in (and left) NA for 500 years
@@qualicumwilson5168 I know
The first peoples in the Americas, were called, the Fa-cowy.
They wandered around for years, wondering where the.... fa-cowy.