Left Out: David Harvey defines Neoliberalism

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 20. 01. 2018
  • David Harvey defines Neoliberalism in less than 6 minutes.
    Left Out, a podcast produced by Paul Sliker, Michael Palmieri, and Dante Dallavalle, creates in-depth conversations with the most interesting political thinkers, heterodox economists, and organizers on the Left.
    Listen to the full episode with David Harvey: • Left Out: David Harvey...
    Left Out is now on Twitter: leftoutpodcast
    ** Left Out depends on your support to keep the show alive. A little goes a very long way. Becoming only a $3 patron allows you to call-in questions for future guests and have the chance to get your voice featured in the episode. / leftout ***

Komentáře • 51

  • @democracyatwrk
    @democracyatwrk  Před 6 lety +2

    *** Left Out depends on your support to keep the show alive. A little goes a very long way. Becoming only a $3 patron allows you to call-in questions for future guests and have the chance to get your voice featured in the episode. www.patreon.com/leftout ****

  • @puppetmastersnightmare3689
    @puppetmastersnightmare3689 Před 6 lety +40

    Neoliberalism = market fundamentalism = unregulated capitalism. Its not a confusing concept. Its naming however seems to create that effect.

  • @eottoe2001
    @eottoe2001 Před 5 lety +6

    It's also a religion and a theology. It isn't limited to one party or another in the countries where it has been installed.

  • @Meow_Zedong
    @Meow_Zedong Před 3 lety +1

    Good video

  • @thosethatcan
    @thosethatcan Před 6 lety

    no labels no lies... -soia 89

  • @Luke43168
    @Luke43168 Před 6 lety +10

    Neoliberalism must just be capitalism returning to its natural state, in modern times. A modern term for capitalism.

  • @kelvinkj7074
    @kelvinkj7074 Před 3 lety

    1:04

  • @0zoneTherapyW0rks
    @0zoneTherapyW0rks Před 6 lety +25

    Neoliberalism has failed. Both Russia and China have rejected it, opting for alternatives to the IMF and World Bank. Austerity is a disaster, an unnecessary one at that. Privatization has failed. Neoclassical economics has failed. The 40-yr. ideology has reached the end of its era. New heterodox economists are now pointing the way forward, out of this sham of an economic policy.

  • @pradyumansingh7575
    @pradyumansingh7575 Před 3 lety +2

    How is someone tracing neoliberalism back to Foucault?

    • @andrewgardner3092
      @andrewgardner3092 Před 3 lety +1

      I would like him to explain that from his perspective, yes, but in my recent conversations with students, we’ve seen the foundational consumer-individual subjectivity of postmodernism as key to the neoliberal project, and equally the postmodern eradication of the capacity to come together at all - the dissembling of the capacity for any worldview - as integral to the neoliberal project.

    • @eliseshle995
      @eliseshle995 Před 3 lety +2

      Through foucaults work on biopower i suppose, the relationship between government and health. What foucault argues is that the health care system, and other govornmental structures, works as tools to generate the politics of bodies, where some bodies is being abled for capitalistic liberation and economic prosper, whereas other bodies are exploited for their weaknesses. Who gets to be a part of the american dream and economic utopia? The idea is that a working body is more relevant and worthy for the neoliberalist society than a disabled one. Understanding neoliberalism through Foucault is more about who gets to be a part of the neoliberal system and not, its a biopolitical method looking at the instituions. It's how i understand biopower at least. :)

  • @sarka74
    @sarka74 Před 5 lety +8

    still missing the definition of the word

  • @yakovmatityahu
    @yakovmatityahu Před 5 lety +1

    Oh God how far the humanity has gone away from your simple and Holy truths...

  • @smartiepancake
    @smartiepancake Před 6 lety

    Georgism > Marxism