Facebook killed my business by disabling my account for one time that I made fun of CNN. We're not going to war with the machines, we're going to war with Silicon Valley CEO's.
clear and correct If you consider yourself to be somewhere in the Democratic middle of the human population, (in all likelihood), and you've met and understood some of the truly outstanding people on the planet, then it's obvious to anyone where the most serious risk comes from, and they've always been here.
It would have been epic if at the end of the speech everyone finds out that the guy is actually a robot lol not an intelligent robot of course but one that is remote controlled and looks %100 human. Someone has to do a speech like that just because it would be poetic.
He seems to describing a kind of 'deep learning' where humans (he) writes the script and computers compute. I thought AI was about the computer learns, and at the end, writes the script itself based on ever increasing data processing and links to other computer programs??.
In opposite to this presenter's talk, I may use a very simple argument. If you do not believe in the soul or something spiritual in us you notice that if intelligence was created by nature itself the process may be recreated. Recreated by nature (aliens living somewhere in the universe) or by human beings as we recreate many natural processes right now and we are revealing the secrets of reality itself. You may say we are not able to build a structure as complicated as we are, but we work together on the topic and create Collective intelligence which is bigger than one human brain and intelligence itself. Maybe we need a technological breakthrough like quantum computing or it is all coding, but we are on the way to create cognitive, self-aware AI.
Great clear presentation, wish I could share this perspective, but cannot: No matter how this is approached, the 'stronger', bigger, faster, broader, deeper intelligence will prevail, so far it's been Human...in 50 years....?? It is irrelevant what mechanism provides the 'intelligence' to solve a specific problem, the quality of the solution matters. While I personally prefer the 'organic' version of intelligence (a bit biased on my part), I have to acknowledge that the silicone version (be it 'real' intelligence or an approximation / emulation thereof) may be more capable, certainly that's what is being designed towards.
Machines only will ever do what they are programmed to do. You cannot design a machine that will decide on its own to design a more intelligent machine. Machines don't care what they do and never will. Building intelligence is the realm of God not man.
Once the the machines begin to act/react like life, then the comment from Jurassic Park "Life will find a way.", will take effect. Instead of dinosaurs it will be AI. We stand a better chance with dinosaurs.
Uhm... bruuuh, Ai just beat that dude at Go yo! It used rational thinking not calculations from a historical index. This model of AI you're talking about is not considered AI anymore. Does anyone have 5 bitcoins I can borrow?
I think this guy is trapped inside his own flawed logic. He starts off with a flawed definition of intelligence and everything after that is base on the error. His haughty self confidence should be the first clue.
an incredibly fast librarian cannot -teach itself how to code and write its own software as it learns -form new neural networks as it learns why do AI presenters on TED not fully explain what AI is and what it will be capable of? they only present a utopian vision of AI
The problematic facts with AI technology is similar but even worse than the problems are with "Genetically Engineered/Modified Food". They simply refuse to explain to the general public the real risks of what it really holds. Only those speakers reveal and warn the public of AI technology's potential risks, who are not working on AI technology. But this particular speaker is involved in AI research, and so, he's trying to tell us that "AI is nothing more than just like a librarian with a powerful search engine". Give me a break! Anyone with a deep and clear understanding can sense that the risk with AI technology is far beyond of anything that we ever faced. This technology when being done in a certain way, is simply will become uncontrollable. In many of this type of talks, the speakers are over-simplifying the facts of what this technology can become. As you very well pointed out: The real AI,---the highly advanced version of it, about 10 to 20 years from now, will be able to teach itself very precisely, and arrange and develop itself based on all data available in all fields of modern science and psychology, all the way to philosophy and everything else that has ever been figured out by all of the many brilliant human thinkers and researchers. This AI technology will be so powerful that not even the smartest human beings will know how to use it wisely. It is a fact. But as you well pointed it out, they are hiding its true potential. Science are playing with fire once again, just like many other times in the past, from the nuclear testing to the development of super micro-organisms to GM food.
I agree with your points. These are my concerns: What happens when AI surpasses human intelligence and capability? What happens when AI understands and realizes that humans are an impediment, irrelevant, and ultimately a threat to its own existence? There is research and work being done to fully integrate Artificial Intelligence with humans. Once this is achieved, it would be elementary for the non-human portion of AI to dispense with humans. The Internet of Things (IoT) will ensure that once AI surpasses human intelligence, it will have complete control over all objects, resources, and humans on the planet. IoT and the internet tramples on any notion of privacy. I believe the genie is already out of the bottle. It does not appear that anything can stop this advance. Just like privacy, I think we have already resigned ourselves and accepted this eventuality.
Your concerns are well-founded and reasonable enough. If computer science will ever be able (if not already) to successfully invent AI, then AI with its high-level logical processing power will quickly be able to figure out that associating with what human beings desire----are not necessarily makes perfect logical sense. Yes, there are lots of people today who cannot wait to be able to download information into their own brain to make themselves more intelligent. This of course, creates a huge demand for a new AI technology which is capable to fully interconnect and integrate with the human brain. So lots of companies seeing this as a huge opportunity to invest their resources into this scientific field. So it is inevitable, it will happen soon or later. And after many people getting this artificial-brain-implant done, from that point forward anything is possible to happen. One thing is for sure, whatever happens and however it happens, humans will change gradually into a robotic like state of mind. And from there on. Humans will not be humans anymore but cyborgs. Nothing can stop it, because too many people and too many high-tech companies are already invested lots of resources and they cannot wait to profit from its gigantic potential. From gigantic 3D-printing technologies, to artificial-brain-implant. They even call it as the beginning of a new industrial revolution, a new era of Computer Renaissance. So there's a lot of passionate AI admiring people out there.
This guy has talent. He gave the whole presentation with both hands tied behind his back.
Facebook killed my business by disabling my account for one time that I made fun of CNN. We're not going to war with the machines, we're going to war with Silicon Valley CEO's.
I'm not afraid of AI, I'm afraid of human judgement in developing, managing and controlling it.
clear and correct
If you consider yourself to be somewhere in the Democratic middle of the human population, (in all likelihood), and you've met and understood some of the truly outstanding people on the planet, then it's obvious to anyone where the most serious risk comes from, and they've always been here.
It would have been epic if at the end of the speech everyone finds out that the guy is actually a robot lol not an intelligent robot of course but one that is remote controlled and looks %100 human. Someone has to do a speech like that just because it would be poetic.
The difference between trusting someone with a plane vs. AI is like trusting someone with a gun vs. a nuclear bomb
He seems to describing a kind of 'deep learning' where humans (he) writes the script and computers compute. I thought AI was about the computer learns, and at the end, writes the script itself based on ever increasing data processing and links to other computer programs??.
In opposite to this presenter's talk, I may use a very simple argument. If you do not believe in the soul or something spiritual in us you notice that if intelligence was created by nature itself the process may be recreated. Recreated by nature (aliens living somewhere in the universe) or by human beings as we recreate many natural processes right now and we are revealing the secrets of reality itself. You may say we are not able to build a structure as complicated as we are, but we work together on the topic and create Collective intelligence which is bigger than one human brain and intelligence itself. Maybe we need a technological breakthrough like quantum computing or it is all coding, but we are on the way to create cognitive, self-aware AI.
I, for one, welcome our new robot overlords.
Oh thank you.
*Assistants. Not overlords.
Great clear presentation, wish I could share this perspective, but cannot: No matter how this is approached, the 'stronger', bigger, faster, broader, deeper intelligence will prevail, so far it's been Human...in 50 years....??
It is irrelevant what mechanism provides the 'intelligence' to solve a specific problem, the quality of the solution matters. While I personally prefer the 'organic' version of intelligence (a bit biased on my part), I have to acknowledge that the silicone version (be it 'real' intelligence or an approximation / emulation thereof) may be more capable, certainly that's what is being designed towards.
Machines only will ever do what they are programmed to do. You cannot design a machine that will decide on its own to design a more intelligent machine. Machines don't care what they do and never will. Building intelligence is the realm of God not man.
Once the the machines begin to act/react like life, then the comment from Jurassic Park "Life will find a way.", will take effect. Instead of dinosaurs it will be AI. We stand a better chance with dinosaurs.
Tulou rules!
Why do these people always stand on a red circle?
Uhm... bruuuh, Ai just beat that dude at Go yo! It used rational thinking not calculations from a historical index. This model of AI you're talking about is not considered AI anymore.
Does anyone have 5 bitcoins I can borrow?
crazy accent
I think this guy is trapped inside his own flawed logic. He starts off with a flawed definition of intelligence and everything after that is base on the error. His haughty self confidence should be the first clue.
first
here we go, only magical souls, thats why swedes have been internationally critizised lacking in ai research
andenandenia he works in the U.K.
an incredibly fast librarian cannot
-teach itself how to code and write its own software as it learns
-form new neural networks as it learns
why do AI presenters on TED not fully explain what AI is and what it will be capable of? they only present a utopian vision of AI
Spirit7862 I agree with you! I thought the same thing.
on the surface, it appears that TED has an agenda wrt Artificial Intelligence. They do not present AI in a truthful manner
The problematic facts with AI technology is similar but even worse than the problems are with "Genetically Engineered/Modified Food". They simply refuse to explain to the general public the real risks of what it really holds. Only those speakers reveal and warn the public of AI technology's potential risks, who are not working on AI technology. But this particular speaker is involved in AI research, and so, he's trying to tell us that "AI is nothing more than just like a librarian with a powerful search engine". Give me a break!
Anyone with a deep and clear understanding can sense that the risk with AI technology is far beyond of anything that we ever faced. This technology when being done in a certain way, is simply will become uncontrollable. In many of this type of talks, the speakers are over-simplifying the facts of what this technology can become.
As you very well pointed out: The real AI,---the highly advanced version of it, about 10 to 20 years from now, will be able to teach itself very precisely, and arrange and develop itself based on all data available in all fields of modern science and psychology, all the way to philosophy and everything else that has ever been figured out by all of the many brilliant human thinkers and researchers. This AI technology will be so powerful that not even the smartest human beings will know how to use it wisely. It is a fact. But as you well pointed it out, they are hiding its true potential. Science are playing with fire once again, just like many other times in the past, from the nuclear testing to the development of super micro-organisms to GM food.
I agree with your points.
These are my concerns:
What happens when AI surpasses human intelligence and capability?
What happens when AI understands and realizes that humans are an impediment, irrelevant, and ultimately a threat to its own existence?
There is research and work being done to fully integrate Artificial Intelligence with humans. Once this is achieved, it would be elementary for the non-human portion of AI to dispense with humans.
The Internet of Things (IoT) will ensure that once AI surpasses human intelligence, it will have complete control over all objects, resources, and humans on the planet.
IoT and the internet tramples on any notion of privacy.
I believe the genie is already out of the bottle. It does not appear that anything can stop this advance. Just like privacy, I think we have already resigned ourselves and accepted this eventuality.
Your concerns are well-founded and reasonable enough. If computer science will ever be able (if not already) to successfully invent AI, then AI with its high-level logical processing power will quickly be able to figure out that associating with what human beings desire----are not necessarily makes perfect logical sense.
Yes, there are lots of people today who cannot wait to be able to download information into their own brain to make themselves more intelligent. This of course, creates a huge demand for a new AI technology which is capable to fully interconnect and integrate with the human brain. So lots of companies seeing this as a huge opportunity to invest their resources into this scientific field. So it is inevitable, it will happen soon or later. And after many people getting this artificial-brain-implant done, from that point forward anything is possible to happen.
One thing is for sure, whatever happens and however it happens, humans will change gradually into a robotic like state of mind. And from there on. Humans will not be humans anymore but cyborgs.
Nothing can stop it, because too many people and too many high-tech companies are already invested lots of resources and they cannot wait to profit from its gigantic potential. From gigantic 3D-printing technologies, to artificial-brain-implant. They even call it as the beginning of a new industrial revolution, a new era of Computer Renaissance. So there's a lot of passionate AI admiring people out there.
first