Dishonour of Cheque | Negotiable Instrument Act 1881 | Section 138 to 142 | Cheque Bounce

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 11. 06. 2021
  • #DishonourOfCheque #ChequeBounce #NegotiableInstrumentAct1881
    Section 138 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
    18 [ 138 Dishonour of cheque for insufficiency, etc., of funds in the account. -Where any cheque drawn by a person on an account maintained by him with a banker for payment of any amount of money to another person from out of that account for the discharge, in whole or in part, of any debt or other liability, is returned by the bank unpaid, either because of the amount of money standing to the credit of that account is insufficient to honour the cheque or that it exceeds the amount arranged to be paid from that account by an agreement made with that bank, such person shall be deemed to have committed an offence and shall, without prejudice to any other provisions of this Act, be punished with imprisonment for 19 [a term which may be extended to two years], or with fine which may extend to twice the amount of the cheque, or with both: Provided that nothing contained in this section shall apply unless-
    (a) the cheque has been presented to the bank within a period of six months from the date on which it is drawn or within the period of its validity, whichever is earlier;
    (b) the payee or the holder in due course of the cheque, as the case may be, makes a demand for the payment of the said amount of money by giving a notice in writing, to the drawer of the cheque, 20 [within thirty days] of the receipt of information by him from the bank regarding the return of the cheque as unpaid; and
    (c) the drawer of such cheque fails to make the payment of the said amount of money to the payee or, as the case may be, to the holder in due course of the cheque, within fifteen days of the receipt of the said notice.
    Explanation.- For the purposes of this section, “debt or other liability” means a legally enforceable debt or other liability.]
    Section 139 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
    1[139. Presumption in favour of holder.-It shall be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, that the holder of a cheque received the cheque of the nature referred to in section 138 for the discharge, in whole or in part, of any debt or other liability.]
    Section 140 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
    1[140. Defence which may not be allowed in any prosecution under section 138.-It shall not be a defence in a prosecution for an offence under section 138 that the drawer had no reason to believe when he issued the cheque that the cheque may be dishonoured on presentment for the reasons stated in that section.]
    Section 141 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
    21 [ 141 Offences by companies. -
    (1) If the person committing an offence under section 138 is a company, every person who, at the time the offence was committed, was in charge of, and was responsible to the company for the conduct of the business of the company, as well as the company, shall be deemed to be guilty of the offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly: Provided that nothing contained in this sub-section shall render any person liable to punishment if he proves that the offence was committed without his knowledge, or that he had exercised all due diligence to prevent the commission of such offence: 22 [Provided further that where a person is nominated as a Director of a company by virtue of his holding any office or employment in the Central Government or State Government or a financial corporation owned or controlled by the Central Government or the State Government, as the case may be, he shall not be liable for prosecution under this Chapter.]
    (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), where any offence under this Act has been committed by a company and it iand shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly. Explanation.- For the purposes of this section,-
    (a) “company” means any body corporate and includes a firm or other association of individuals; and
    (b) “director”, in relation to a firm, means a partner in the firm.]
    Section 142 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
    23 [ 142 Cognizance of offences. -Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974)-
    (a) no court shall take cognizance of any offence punishable under section 138 except upon a complaint, in writing, made by the payee or, as the case may be, the holder in due course of the cheque;
    (b) such complaint is made within one month of the date on which the cause of action arises under clause (c) of the proviso to section 138: 24 [Provided that the cognizance of a complaint may be taken by the Court after the prescribed period, if the complainant satisfies the Court that he had sufficient cause for not making a complaint within such period.]
    (c) no court inferior to that of a Metropolitan Magistrate or a Judicial Magistrate of the first class shall try any offence punishable under section 138.]

Komentáře • 32