Just the fact that there are soft tissues and blood vessels present _should_ be enough to contradict the "millions of years" argument: These things just don't last that long no matter how good they would be preserved, period. I mean, MILLIONS of years... that's a heck of a long time. "Carbon dating" really seems bogus.
I mean what are you gonna base that assumption on? Science? You can't just claim science is wrong and then use another scientific assumption just as arbitrary to prove it.
Regarding the flood.. Scientists (secular scientists, at that) have found 3x's the volume of all the ocean water on the surface captured under the earth w/in the crust, over at a major fault line near Japan.. Over 3 times the ocean water, under the crust.. Even w/ the mountains today, that is more than enough water...
In regards to the Flood story, if as Creationists usually say that the whole earth was radically reworked by the flood, how then do we explain Eden in Genesis, which appears to be given a real location? Presumably when Moses wrote this the whole Earth's topography would have been radically different because of the flood, if the flood deposited all the sedimentary layers of rock on earth.
Fossilized mammals are rare in general, not just humans. Here’s a pretty good link answersingenesis.org/fossils/fossil-record/where-are-all-the-human-fossils/
Creationist YECs always worry about how long it took to cut the canyon. Get the whole story. The ‘Super Group’ of rock layers in the Grand Canyon is below the level layers at the east end. These layers were laid down level, then block faulted into mountains, then worn flat, and then the Teapeats Sandstone was laid down over these basement layers. Then another 5000 feet of sediments was laid down, some wind-blown desert sands and some corals. Then the whole area was raised to 8000 feet above sea level as water flowing down hill cut the canyon. How long do you think this took?
This is an anti-Christian appeal to science. Amazing how deluded these people are thinking that appealing to "science" as an authority makes their faith or religion stronger.
Just the fact that there are soft tissues and blood vessels present _should_ be enough to contradict the "millions of years" argument: These things just don't last that long no matter how good they would be preserved, period. I mean, MILLIONS of years... that's a heck of a long time. "Carbon dating" really seems bogus.
I mean what are you gonna base that assumption on? Science? You can't just claim science is wrong and then use another scientific assumption just as arbitrary to prove it.
We are also the center of the universe. Watch the movie The Principle.
Blessed Mother said "...she (Russia) will spread her errors throughout the world." not 1 - single Error.
Regarding the flood.. Scientists (secular scientists, at that) have found 3x's the volume of all the ocean water on the surface captured under the earth w/in the crust, over at a major fault line near Japan.. Over 3 times the ocean water, under the crust.. Even w/ the mountains today, that is more than enough water...
check out the Noah talk before this one. Very cool
In regards to the Flood story, if as Creationists usually say that the whole earth was radically reworked by the flood, how then do we explain Eden in Genesis, which appears to be given a real location? Presumably when Moses wrote this the whole Earth's topography would have been radically different because of the flood, if the flood deposited all the sedimentary layers of rock on earth.
I really want to keep an open mind on this, but how do you explain not finding any human bones in "the flood fossil record"?
Fossilized mammals are rare in general, not just humans. Here’s a pretty good link answersingenesis.org/fossils/fossil-record/where-are-all-the-human-fossils/
At 2:40 you talk about 2-5 million year old fossils. Did you mean to say 2-5 thousand years?
I wish I could see the slides presented. Thanks for publishing this.
Creationist YECs always worry about how long it took to cut the canyon. Get the whole story.
The ‘Super Group’ of rock layers in the Grand Canyon is below the level layers at the east end. These layers were laid down level, then block faulted into mountains, then worn flat, and then the Teapeats Sandstone was laid down over these basement layers. Then another 5000 feet of sediments was laid down, some wind-blown desert sands and some corals. Then the whole area was raised to 8000 feet above sea level as water flowing down hill cut the canyon. How long do you think this took?
Apostolic Hawaiian I've seen this fool running around with a different username--same picture and argument style. Yes, definitely a boomer, booming.
This is an anti-Christian appeal to science. Amazing how deluded these people are thinking that appealing to "science" as an authority makes their faith or religion stronger.