1970 1/2 RS Z28 for sale 360HP Frame off,one owner, auto appraisal Fenton Flint Michigan
Vložit
- čas přidán 21. 06. 2012
- Certified auto appraisal performed by Jason Phillips, owner of Auto Appraise Inc. Over $75,000 spent in 2 year period restoring this one family owned, 48,000 mile documented Camaro. Over 300 still photos and 5 page report that outline every detail of this 360 HP number's matching muncie 4 speed, also number's matching car. From the red oxide primer floors to the correct classic copper exterior, it shows fabulous detail. Everything works, watch the video, then call for a report and set of photos if you are interested in purchasing it. 800-301-3886 www.autoappraise.com For sale, asking $49,000.00 or best.
UPDATE: Thanks for looking, this car has been sold as of 7-17-12. And THAT"S how we do it! - Auta a dopravní prostředky
It's odd that GM never optioned a oil pressure gauge in these like the previous year Z/28s had !
Hi Jason, nice car. I havent forgotten about you guys. I always look out for you for sale cars, when im ready to buy again these are the only cars i would ever consider buying overseas, with confidence from your quality presentations and amazing knowledge. Warwick Gardiner (Melbourne, Australia)
Did anyone pick up the Hyd cam? It had a little lifter tapping for the first few seconds when he started the engine. Solid lifter cams don't do this.
Has the wrong tachometer. Should be an 8000 rpm tach with a 6500 rpm redline............. but I am picking nits
I suspect it's not a real Z28. Where's the floor mounted gas pedal. All 70-71 Z28's got them. And why would anyone swap out the tach for the incorrect one? Cowl tag rivets have been tampered with too. Shiny valve covers are not stock, and it also has the incorrect PCV valve hose. I bought my 70 Z28 in 1981 from the orig owner.
May not even be a real RS
The floor pivot gas pedal is always the give away
Video Has Some Age,What Did It Eventually Sell For ? Rare Color for theZ/28 & Seemed to Be In Good Shape
What kind of a stroke takes his boyfriend for a ride in a car like this wearing sandals?
Where is the bracket that hold the Heater Hoses - suppose to be on the Alternator, to hold the heater hoses in place ?
If they were up ur ass u would know
Why are you driving with your foot riding the clutch?
Suspect This "Z" Started it's Life as a RS & Z Stripes Were Added Later,Believe Friend of Mine that Once Worked in NORWOOD PLANT,Once Mentioned the RS's Had the Lower Red Line Tach,Whereas Z ' S Had the Higher Rpm Tach.But DOES Have the Winters Intake that Came only on Z-28 & 375h.p.L-78 Option on This Year,Reg.Believe the Reg RS,Non Z-28 Had the Non Alum Intake.
Jeff Gordon competes in sandals just like these!
How do you frame-off a unibody car?
Take the sub frame off.
Dude why would you do a vid with mandels on?
Bias-ply tires should be on museum display cars only. On a running high performer, they are a bad idea.
Not a 360 horse motor..has a hyd.cam...you can tell by the shift points......if it was solid.itsdo 800.r.pretty car though. They spent some money on it...r
Unless you enjoy restoring a car yourself (and many people do), "...in excess of $75,000..." asking $49,000 OBO says it all.
they never made a 70 1/2 camaro , what kind of person would say that no 70 1/2
Incorrect, all 1st year 2nd generation Z28's were 1970 1/2 production runs!!!
@@dennymcfastlane8530 no such factory designation as "70 1/2." It was a 1970 year model regardless of the strike that impacted production. Chevrolet never put out a "70 1/2" anything.
@@barnabyjones5161 True, no official 1/2 designation. And why? Because why would Chevrolet want to remind everyone why the Camaro was first offered to the public in the showrooms in February of 1970, instead of the Promised & Planned and Hugely Promoted August 1969 releases.
The Camaro was delayed because of rear quarter panel buckling at Fisher Body Stamping, and not because of a Strike. The 174 day Norwood, Ohio strike affected the 1972 Camaro.
@@dennymcfastlane8530 interesting
Valve covers are waaaaaay too shiny to be OEMs.
This and and another Z28- on youtube have 5,000 redlines with 7 not 8 grand tach's tell me they are both most likely fakes. I wouldn't think about buying these cars unless you have some real documentation, not some fake reproduction build sheet in perfect condition...
Here is why it's fun to collect cars and keep copies of the paperwork: I am a previous owner of the Daytona yellow Z-28 with the black vinyl top posted here...I know who the original owner was as well. I passed all of the original documentation (well documented) on to the next buyer, Including the original window sticker, owner's packet (including the owner's manual and protect-a-plate), the original sales contract, the salesman's business card and etc. The person who bought this car has a real deal Z-28 with the correct equipment...But having said this, it did not have the correct cam, heads and spoilers when I bought it. These I corrected. The wheels, although correct, are not the ones the car was born with. It had a set of rally wheels on it. The car had one of those tall spoilers on the rear as a result of a rear end collision. Although the car was repaired, and it looked fine, an inspection by the guy I sold the car to (a Washington state Chevy dealer) revealed that the rear quarters had been replaced but fitted incorrectly by the body shop in Fairbanks, Alaska where the original owner served in the Army. All of the rear sheet metal needed to be replaced for a correct restoration...but I wasn't going to do that. I had the trunk lid replaced when I installed the correct small spoiler. It was a big piece of bondo. The rear panel was a rough "used" piece as well...the original having been destroyed in the collision. I am glad to see that the body was finally repaired correctly. When I found out that the car had been in a rear-end collision, I returned $1,500 to the new buyer to make it right. I also located in the paperwork packet for the car the body shop receipt for the repairs--from the mid 1970s. So, I had no seller's remorse at the time. It's also interesting to note that the rear window defroster does not appear on the window sticker. This was added by the Chevy dealer in Fairbanks, AK, shortly after the original owner arrived there. The receipt for this was with the car when I sold it. To settle the transmission issue: This car was equipped with RPO 5M20AU, 4-speed Transmission for $205.95. It was indeed wide ratio. The rear axle was RPO 5G80AA Positraction Axle for $44.25. 3.73:1 ratio. Did I mention how much I like collecting cars?
Frame off huh? Camaros had no frame
Front frame.
YOU ARE "CORRECT" Lol
Mine had a 160 mph speedometer but this one has 150 but mine had the 3 speed auto which imho is far better, but hey whatever cool car and rebuild.
No it didn't. They didn't make a 160mph speedo in a 1970 camaro. Normal was 130mph and z/28 was 150mph.
@@barnabyjones5161 funny i owned one...try again
@@barnabyjones5161 i owned a 1970 1/2 z28 with an LT1 engine 3 speed posi traction and engagenent 360 hp @ 3600 rpm. I bought it off of a racer at Darlington. Nothing ever beat it and i mean nothing even came close except 1 car. A 1972 corvette with an LT2 engine which also had a 160 mph speedometer.
@@johnnysystem2579 i currently own one. I'm actively working on it.
@@johnnysystem2579 no such thing as a "70 1/2." It was a 1970 model year. Mine's a z/28 as well. LT1 block but it's been bored to a 355 now and is mildly built. Factory auto but a previous owner put a 4spd in it. I just put the factory auto back in (freshly rebuilt with a shift kit). 3.73 ltd slip rear end.
that rear deck Finn looks rong
Correct for 1970 1/2
@@itacud2 heyjoe
3ye must hav ben lo0k at somother buckett
datt finn lo0kz rite
70s dude,quit nit picking
Not correct with many aspects beware buying on Internet do complete research