Prof. Solberg I love how what u say is super informative. Your words are backed up and u don’t contradict yourself by speaking a lot of unnecessary words. I love how u don’t condemn others or mock people. I really enjoyed ur closing remarks also. I appreciate you and how u spread God’s word and love. Peace be with you both.
Thank you so Much Mr Solberg for Your Contributions in God's Work Your teachings help me a lot personally. May Our Gracious lord Yeshua Use you more and more For his Glory ❤
@@TheBiblicalRoots If New David fears YHWH, then he can't be YHWH. Isaiah 11:1-3. David will be YHWH's servant. Jer 33:26, Eze 34:23, 37:24. Which means he isn't YHWH. Is YHWH his own servant and does he fear himself? Of course not. Whatever David may be, he isn't YHWH. He will only be the the servant of YHWH.
I’m at the closing statement right now. I enjoyed this debate. God bless you sir! I wish Rabbi Tovia Singer the best and I pray Jesus will reveal himself to him in person.
Rob I’ve watched your videos for a while now and I want to say you are always so kind and loving no matter who you’re talking to or what subject. Your tone never changes and you desire to share the gospel remains your most important message! Thank you, God bless you!
What a great respectful mature exchange of beliefs was made at this 'debate'. Thank you both and everyone who made it possible and made it available so widely. As a Christian I come away with greater respect for the Jewish perspective without losing an iota of faith and belief that Yeshua is the promised Messiah. As Prof. Rob summarised, the evidence of Jesus life, crucifixion and resurrection is testimony to old testament scripture, not opposition to it. Rabbi and Professor I have immense respect for both of you. Thankyou.
In this whole 2 hour debate, one key event caught my attention. One thing that really set apart the true and the false between the two speakers: one was humble and genuine enough to pray to God before speaking, while the other never even thought about it. One demonstrated a relationship with God while the other thinks he has.
Rabbi Tovia Singer can not understand any truth you share Professor Solberg, as he can not appreciate anything that is explained to him. His ears become deaf, his eyes are blinded to the merits of the true doctrine of Jesus Christ, and everyone who knows our Messiah Yeshua gets the distinct impression that this person's heart has indeed been sealed and that he is blind leading the blind. See Isaiah 29. We pray for our enemies, those who harm us in differing ways and we forgive them for their transgressions upon us.
Rabbi Tovia Singer should tell you all about Psalm 2:12 12 Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way, when his wrath is kindled but a little. Blessed are all they that put their trust in him.
Tovia Singer has some great linguistic techniques that serve as great walls in a debate, very impressive. You did really well, this is the first I've seen of you. Both of you are good communicators.
He seriously is recycling jokes and rebuttals from other debates I’ve seen. I’ve not finished yet, but he’s yet to answer the objections put before him.
Congratulations from France, I am a follower of rabbi Tovia Singer, and I have already watched the debate on his channel, I really appreciated the quality of your arguments, your sense of humor and your ability to always remain calm in defending your points of view, which unfortunately is not always the case in this type of debate. Thank you very much for this very interesting debate.
I know that rob is calm when he debates, but rabbi tovia singer appears to be misleading and at times deceitful, and I have no problem addressing how deceitful he is and will give him examples. He was shocked at the way rob debated him. The problem I have with rob is that he distinguishes the law of God from the law of Moses, and I do call him out on it.
Tovia Singer is not a Jew. None of the semites who claim to be Jews are Jews. Ask him to prove he is a Jew...he can't. All he can prove is that they are semites which are descendents of Canaan. Liars...every one of them.
There is no such thing as a christian bible. Remember this, that the Gospel is the life of Yeshua and his purpose. The Acts of the Apostles has to do more with the lives of the Apostles, disciples, the body of Yeshua, and the Epistles are letters of correction. Revelation is a book of prophecy. Another thing is that you continue to lend your ears to rob. You are allowing yourself to be engraved with some of his distorted teachings on certain topics.
This was a great and civil discussion. I have been greatly blessed by the dialogue here, from both Singer & Solberg. I am a Torah-observant follower of Messiah, drawn to observe Solberg's work to test my own faith, convictions, and actions. I think it is beautiful when we can come together as beloved followers of the Most High El of Abraham, Isaac, & Jacob.
I just watched the debate a second time. I love your energy Rob. During the cross-examination you could see and feel your focus, you did your homework and were prepared. Amazing, it carried over into your closing argument. I didn't want your time to end. Here we are still after over 2,000 yrs talking about a back woods Rabbi, awesome , loved you phrased it that way. Not what you said exactly but true to the point you were making. Again as I've said before your desire and love for the Truth is evident. I'm inspired to be better in my pursuit of Truth in my studies of scripture and also witnessing. God Bless 🙏
@@TheBiblicalRoots At about 43 minutes, Tovia made a claim about Paul quoting nonexistent scripture. I never caught a response from you(???). Also, what are your thoughts on his closing argument that Christianity being the most widespread religion proves it is the wrong religion/faith according to scripture? I started following your page because most of my friends have either adopted the Progressive/New Age “Christianity” or Torah Observance. Thanks so much for your videos. ☺️
@@sammyroscher5921 I’m Torah observant and I watch Rob all the time. We have disagreements but I see him as a brother in the faith and I have a lot of respect for him because of this debate. I wanted to attempt to answer your questions if that would be okay. As for Paul, I do not believe he was quoting a specific verse but rather he was referring to the entirety of the the Old Testament scriptures. The topic of the majority is a good argument until you remember that the promise to Abraham was that his descendants would be numbered like the stars in the sky.
@@hosea4660 And Jesus confirms it with a parable, Lu 13:18-19 (NASB), "So He was saying, “What is the kingdom of God like, and to what shall I compare it? “It is like a mustard seed, which a man took and threw into his own garden; and it grew and became a tree, and THE BIRDS OF THE AIR NESTED IN ITS BRANCHES.”
Changing Rabbi Singer's mind was actually my fourth priority, Samuel. The top priority was sharing the Gospel of Jesus with tens of thousands of people in a way they may never have heard before, showing how it is completely connected to (and grounded in) the Tanakh. The second priority was to present a compelling biblical and intellectual case for the Messiahship of Jesus to the listeners. The third priority was to "put a pebble in the shoe" of skeptical listeners who _thought_ they knew who this Jesus character was; I wanted to leave them with a nugget or two to chew on. The distant fourth priority was convincing Rabbi Singer. But I do still pray for his eyes to be opened to his Messiah! Shalom, Rob
@@TheBiblicalRoots I appreciate your work, to God be the glory! I say this in kindness and a loving tone which I don't want misunderstood by being in text, but... I was unsettled in the spirit when you prayed for God to bless him and gave promotion of his books. Why pray for God to bless and increase the wolves actively devouring the flock? Kindness, love your neighbor, honorable debate, respect... Yup absolutely, but don't wonder why your flock is dwindling or you find them slaughtered about, when your blessing the wolves with food and their packs increase and circle about. I just couldn't stop this vision pressed upon me each time this happened. Still, this was the best debate I've seen with him, he's nearly unbearable to watch but I really learned a lot from you. He really didn't answer anything though. Great job! You definitely won the debate though I know it didn't matter either way. I'm just claiming it for Jesus! 😆👍💯
I just wanted to say thank you Prof Solberg for agreeing to this debate. And for treating it with respect. Our Rabbi had nothing but good things to say about you when we met up in Dallas. I only wish perhaps in a future time you could discuss subjects like this without the timer. So many things that could've been said weren't. And it just seemed when you and our dear Rabbi were sitting and talking back and forth, more comparisons were made. Again thank you, and may Hashem bless you and your family.
Thank you, Yasmin! I agree, a lot was left unsaid. But I really enjoyed my time getting to know Rabbi Singer before and during the debate. Blessings, Rob
Yes, a lot was unsaid, but a lot was unanswered as well, and I am referring to rabbi tovia singer in the unanswered comment. He was prevented from distorting the Brit-Chadashah because God stopped him from bringing it up, leaving him in the Tanakh so that Yeshua could be shown in the Tanakh. By the way, using jokes is part of his tactic to draw people toward him, but being that he was stopped from discussing the Brit-Chadashah, he had to double up on his jokes. I am sorry to say this, but he appears to be very arrogant.
@Sundown Sam Well, actually I could have said the same about Prof. Solberg who used just as much humor and his own methods of distracted distortion to present his case. That's how debate works. If that's a problem for you they were both guilty of doing it. I could argue that Prof. Solberg intentionally consumed most of the Rabbi's time so he didn't get to ask more than one question. Was that fair? Yes, because a debate is like having a theological battle. Singer imho was too nice and allowed the Prof to have more time when he should've reminded them earlier that the Prof. time for asking questions was up. I'm assuming you saw the entire video, so do you recall what Prof. Solberg said about owning both of Rabbi Singer's books? That means that Solberg knows exactly what Rabbi Singer's response to a couple points would've been, so why would the Rabbi waste words on something that would've eaten up probably 10 minutes of the debate time? I would've done the same thing and picked what I felt was the more pertinent things to mention while ignoring the things I didn't see as important. That's why I think it would be really informative to have an untimed discussion between the Rabbi and the Prof, where there isn't a timer so they could have a more relaxed, round table sort of discussion. The only problem is that might take days to do so there would have to be some sort of cut off, but it would still be good imho. You didn't bring up what you thought was an unanswered comment, so I'm not sure we're looking at the same things, but from my perspective, the unanswered comments are actually answered in Rabbi Singer's book vol 1 of Let's Get Biblical.
Not that I am defending rob because I do have problems with his views on some issues, but rob did not use jokes to shy away from responding to questions. That is not the way debates should be, but it appears they try to work it that way to avoid responding, and this is the tactic Rabbi Tovia Singer appears to be using in all of his debates. Yes, I have a problem with that because it appears that jokes are used as camouflage to avoid responding to questions. The reason rabbi tovia singer was too nice was because he was stopped from bringing up the Brit-Chadashah and that is what he is good at distorting. Not to mention, he was caught off guard; he probably rob to be that prepared. About rob picking up two of rabbi tovia singer's books shows that he entered the debate prepared and there is nothing wrong with that. I do agree with you on the debates. In the future, there should be a moderator to make sure a question is responded to before asking another question or changing topics.
@Sundown Sam There was a moderator. It was the person who introduced them. As for Singer's jokes, what can I say. I don't read minds, but I don't see them as a means to avoid answering questions. Jews and humor are like peas in a pod. When the world is worrying about life, we're joking about it and finding ways to make it easier until things get better. If you want to see them as a bad thing, that's your choice. I feel sorry for someone who hates humor yeesh, life must be really tense for you. Did I say there was anything wrong with Solberg's buying a copy of Singer's books? However if he really did read them, why did he ask a simple question when the answer is already in the book? What would be the point to ask questions you already know the answer to? Unless it was intended to stall and divert attention from the real topic. I'll have to watch the video again I guess. Nothing stopped Singer from bringing up anything about the supposed Brit-Chadashah as you call it. It didn't have anything to do with the topic. Btw, are you talking about the ברית חדשׁה (barit Chadash) mentioned in Jeremiah 31:31? I think you put an extra -ah on it. Just thought you'd like to know. And that's talking about the covenant God will make with the house of Israel and the house of Judah. Which Singer has talked about several times, but again it had nothing to do with the topic they were discussing. And in case you'd like to know read the verse. The text says that the days come (that means in the future), says Hashem, that I will make a new covenant (brit hadash) with the house of Israel and the house of Judah; (this is one half of the entire statement btw, not the whole thing). Who was the house of Israel and who was the house of Judah? The house of Israel as it's mentioned several times in the bible, was what the northern kingdom was called. It consisted of 10 tribes, who went off the path as we call it and started picking up the practices from the pagan nations around them. Their wickedness grew worse and worse, so God sent them into exile. BUT Jeremiah prophesied that the lost kingdom which consisted of most of the 10 tribes will be returned in the end days. Further instead of two kingdoms God will unite them with Judah. Which will be one kingdom as it was in the beginning. So to know if there is a new covenant yet between the house of Israel and the house of Judah, we first have to ask is have the 10 tribes returned to the land of Israel? That answer is no. So there is no new covenant yet. I won't confuse you with the facts of what the new covenant is, but read Jeremiah 31:31-34. Or the whole chapter if you like. Anyway, the subject of the debate was about whether Jesus was the promised Jewish messiah. Not whether God made a new covenant or not. Hope that helps you understand why the Rabbi probably chose to stay on topic instead of going off on a side subject.
Prof Solberg is bright but he got rocked. However, here are some points R Singer could have been more clear and confident on. 1. There was not a single Jew in the 2nd temple period, Philo included, who thought that Gods supernal wisdom was an uncreated divine person. Philos "logos" is created, the kabbalists chochma ilaa is created, Proverbs 8 tells us all of this explicitly. Jesus was claiming to be an incarnation of Gods wisdom, but definitely not God himself. See Tertullian against praxeas, where he specifically states that Jesus was a created being whos will and power was completely nullified by father, the one true God, which created him. 2. the angel of the Lord "stuff". Haggai 1, the prophet is called the angel of the Lord. I guess Haggai is God too, now, huh? No, angel means angel. How about when Moses says "I am the Lord your God", is Moses God? Some 2nd temple writings call Moses the God-man, so I guess they meant that literally, huh? No. How about Joshua 24? Is Samuel God? Is Israel God (Is. 45:14 Israel is yeishtahavu, literally worshipped)? NO! Only God is God because He is one, where as everything in creation, Jesus included, are not. We are finite, He is infinite, etc.
@@MrMaxSkorpion your second point is fallacious. We know that angel can refer to messenger. However in certain "angel of the LORD" passages there are clear references to the angel of YHWH seemingly claiming deity. Gen 16:7-14, 22:11-15, Jud 13:3-22. It must be taken on a verse by verse basis. There are more passages I could cite to.
@@mikeprew1. Jude is not in the bible because God did not inspire it. 2. It's literally your OPINION that the angel claims deity. You should try rereading my original comment. The fact that an angel is called "god" would only be germain if the God of Israel were the only person called "god", which isnt true in the Hebrew bible or the NT.
@@MrMaxSkorpion You are mixed up. *Angel means messenger and when the Lord of hosts is sent by the Lord of hosts as in Zechariah 2:8-11 he becomes the Angel of the Lord but he's the Lord himself.* *Only God is God because he is ONE Trinity as in, **_"Hear O Israel, the Lord (1), our God (2), the Lord (3) echad."_* *Jesus is the God of Israel aka the Angel of the Lord, the Word of the Lord, the Name of the Lord, the Arm/Hand of the Lord, etc.* *Jesus is referred to as God's servant Israel in Isaiah 49:1-7 and other scriptures because he will come in human form by being born to the virgin from the house of David and in him will be realized the blessings and promises given to Jacob/Israel.* *Similarly, the Messiah Jesus is referred to as David in messianic prophecies because he is a fulfillment of the promises God made to King David.*
Rob, Thank you for your patience in debating with people who close their bible at the end of Malachi and proudly choose to remain in darkness. In contrast, in great humility, Jesus showed He was truly the light of the world. I think the fact that Rabbi Tovia Singer refuses any future debate with Dr Michael Brown speaks volumes...
Professor Solberg was so humble, and kind …he’s a great representative for what Jesus teaches us to be. Not to mention he spoke the truth and was able to back up what he was saying. The rabbi did not seem to show Christians the same love and kindness though, but rather mocked Christian’s and he behaved very smug IMO and like he thinks he’s better. Plus he deflected questions being asked of him and made accusations without backing them up. He also left out the word “and” from Isaiah 44:1…. 1Yet now hear, O Jacob my servant; and Israel, whom I have chosen: It’s really important not to add or take away words, since it then changes the meaning.
This was a very interesting debate indeed. The one thing that was a bit irritating, is that Rabbi Singer tried to ignore the elephant in the room, namely the fact that his interpretation of the scriptures are not necessarily the same as quite a few of the Jewish Rabbis in ancient times' were (specifically referring to the interpretation of Isaiah 53). Rabbi Singer claimed that we should ONLY consult the scriptures, and forget about how ancient Rabbis interpreted Isaiah 53. If this is truly the way, why does Rabbinic Judaism, insist that Jewish people NEVER read the Tanakh without Rabbinical (men's) interpretation? Other than this obvious hypocrisy, I have to thank both parties for being respectful and mostly kind towards each other.
One thing Rabbi Singer is missing and that Professor Solberg didn't mention is the precious born-again experience that only occurs when one repents and accepts Jesus as their personal Saviour. A miracle of rebirth that occurs in the human heart by the power of the Holy Spirit. Like the gospel song said "if God is dead, who's this living in my soul?"
Not everyone has a miracle experience like u say u did. So God plays favorites when saving people? Exactly why your belief is unfounded and your faith based on how it makes you feel. No thanks!
The New Birth experience and further experiences are what kept me in the Christian faith. However I also realised that I accepted a lot of doctrinal errors because I falsely assumed that this experience validates everything the church teaches. Unfortunately, what often happens, is, that Christians who are led by the Holy Spirit and read scripture, see that some passages don’t agree with the church teachings. However they are being told not to trust the guidance of the spirit and should rather follow the church teachings. Soon they become dependent on the church for insight and learn to filter out anything that doesn’t agree.
Thank you for sharing! This was a real eye opener for me, to see what Yeshua was up against- lack of faith and then disbelief in the face of so many miracles, let alone fulfillment of prophecies.😢
The Rabbi failed to read Hosea 6:2 when stating that Paul’s comment in 1 Corinthians 15 was invented. Also Isaiah 53 states that Messiah would die for our sins. Paul did reference scripture correctly, Yeshua is the Messiah Amen.
Mr. Tovia Singer if the servant in Isai 53 is the nation Israel as you claim Question 1. V8 - "for the transgression of my people was he stricken", if "my people" here refers to Israel, God's people, then who is the"he" (The servant) that is stricken? 2. V9- If the "he" mentioned here is Israel as you claim, has the nation Israel not done violence and deceit? The Tanakh is full of Israel's violence and deceit. 3. V10 - How can the soul of sinful Israel be accepted by God as sin offering? 4. V11 - If the servant is Israel, whose iniquities does israel bear? 5. V12 - How did the nation Israel make intersession for the transgressors?
Great questions!!! I bet he's to scared to even try answering. He'll make lame jokes, mock Christianity and cry about Christians reading books regardless if we actuality read or bring them up which... Who cares? Then laugh and blab on about unrelated topics. I really wanted him to give an answer for Isaiah 53 at least, but he couldn't give an answer. He's all over the place and the status of the debate for Singer... is directly proportional to the state of his soul. 😧👎LOST.
At 44 minutes mr singer says Paul made up verses. Paul makes the claim to have received revelation from the risen Jesus. Jesus said the only sign that would be given is the sign of Jonah. We know from the scriptures that Jonah was in the belly of the fish for 3 days. We know from the gospels that Jesus was in the heart of the earth for 3 days. This is the connection paul and was making 🙏❤️
@@beng7431 if you read the story of Jonah you read that Jonah says “I cried out of the belly of hell”. Just as Jesus died on the cross Jonah died in the belly of the fish. This is the connection Jesus made with Jonah.
There are not. many Christian scholars who would agree to a public debate with Rabbi Singer. It was amazing to see how he can quote from the entire bible without any notes in English and Hebrew. I have watched his live broadcasts on his Facebook Chanel and I always learn so much. Thank you both for being so respectful.
There are many who would have no problem debating rabbi tovia singer, and the majority of them probably would not be scholars. You appear to think that one needs to have a biblical degree to debate rabbi tovia singer. Another thing is that the Holy Spirit is the one who teaches according to what God made clear when he first spoke, and he is the one who gives us scriptural understanding of the truth of God's word. With the above being said, how should one debate rabbi tovia singer? Make sure he does not reference the Talmuh, and being that he does not believe Yeshua is the Messiah, one needs to stop him from bringing up the Brit-Chadashah. Just stay on the Tanalk. Yeshua will be seen from the Tanakh, and God will bring them to the Brit-chadashah.
more like Brown slaughtered Tovia so badly that Tovia refused to air the debate for a long time. Brown only engages in personal attacks against Tovia because time and time again the Rabbi has used scriptures deceptively to captivate a misunderstood audience. there are many times he rips a verse out of context or makes up his own translation and changes the meaning.@@Ancient-theology
Gospels were written much earlier and when Paul said according to Scripture, he referred to the gospels. We have internal evidences to prove Gospels especially Matthew and Mark were written earlier. So Paul could quote …according to the scripture
Singer is not willing to understand double prophecy. He can only see how the "plain meaning" of Isa 7:15-"before the boy knows enough to reject the wrong and choose the right, the land of the two kings you dread will be laid waste" - meaning that Isaiah believes the child he has just described (v. 14) will be born within his lifetime, as a harbinger of the destruction (by Assyria!) of kings Rezin of Aram and Pekah of Remaliah (7:1). The language of 8:3 echoes that of 7:14 as Isaiah goes in to the prophetess and she conceives and gives birth to a son. It is no longer controversial to observe that the ‘almah of 7:14 simply refers to a young woman of marriageable age, without settling the question of her virginity. Thus it seems most likely that the child of 7:14 is Isaiah's son, Maher-Shalal-Hash-Baz. Isaiah 8:4 reinforces this equation, with language carefully reminiscent of 7:15-"Before the boy knows how to say ‘My father' or ‘My mother,' the wealth of Damascus and the plunder of Samaria will be carried off by the king of Assyria." Only now Israel is explicitly included among Assyria's victims. However what Singer doesn't understand is that at the same time, 7:14 refers to the enigmatic child as Immanuel, "God with us," the name that recurs in 8:8 and 10. This name likewise links the child with Maher-Shalal-Hash-Baz but also points forward to a more distant time when the plans of Israel's enemies will be thwarted (8:9-10). This "bifocal vision" prepares the reader for 9:1-7, which is all about restoration after the punishment begun by Assyria. In this context appear the words musically immortalized by Handel, "For to us a child is born, to us a son is given" (9:6a). Against the current critical consensus it is difficult to identify this son, who is an heir to David's throne, "Mighty God," "Everlasting Father," "Prince of Peace," and governing eternally (9:6b-7), with anyone other than Israel's royal Messiah, and we ought not be surprised to learn that that is precisely how the post-Christian Jewish Targum understood it. While dating traditions in the Isaiah Targum proves notoriously difficult, it does seem unlikely that any Scripture would first be taken as messianic in any Jewish context aware of Christian claims for that text. We do not know why the translators of the LXX chose parthenos-a term that does imply sexual virginity-to render ‘almah, but it seems reasonable to assume that part of the reason was that they too recognized Immanuel was no ordinary child whose fulfillment was exhausted in the life of Maher-Shalal-Hash-Baz. Certainly no figures in between Isaiah's day and Jesus' birth even remotely qualify for this child who is a sign of divine presence; hence it seems appropriate to use the expression, "double fulfillment." Isaiah recognized that his son would be a sign and symbol (8:18), both of God's activity in his day and of the ultimate child who would comprehensively fulfill the Immanuel promises of chaps. 7-9. It's this double prophecy we also see in Isaiah and despite it also talks of Israel as a nation the double prophecy in 53 brings us to the messiah, as if you study Isaiah 53 in its full context you must raise the question how all of the content can possibly apply to Israel or did Israel ever be righteous or die for the sins of Israel etc?
Oh my goodness!!! Absolutely loved this. It was dripping with scripture and I’m with you RL, I learned a lot. If this debate was another 2 hours I would’ve listened. He definitely knows his scripture but he has to deny a lot to say the Old Testament doesn’t point to Christ as our savior. You did awesome!
@@truediscussionmedia1481 Christians draw their conclusions about Jesus from their Christian scripures, like Mormons do from their scriptures.(BOM) Jews reject Jesus because they draw their conclusions from the Hebrew scriptures.
@@truediscussionmedia1481 The Hebrew bible is clear about the role of the Messiah. 1)Jews reunification 2)The Temple rebuilt 3)World Peace, etc. The Christian scriptures make the claim Jesus was the Messiah without him having actually fulfilled the role.
Something I noted: Rabbi Singer never really answers any of the questions that Solberg asks. I was looking forward to his explanations as to why he disbelieves Jesus, the resurrection, and the NT writers and validity of the entire NT. I watched the entire video....Rabbi skillfully skirted those Jesus questions that Solberg kept asking him throughout the entire debate. And even at the very end...Solberg respectfully asks him to please address at least one Jesus-question in the Rabbi's closing argument. Crickets. (Sly fox.)
I get Singers aversion to the resurrection as a starting point, but isn't the evidence for the resurrection similar to the flood which he affirms? And he seemed to dismiss the resurrection as democracy and yet would affirm Jewish tradition by the same.
Two brilliant biblical scholars, each make very convincing arguments. One is right, and one is wrong. They both believe with all their heart, yet one may go to hell for not believing, and the other may be condemned for idolatry. I see truth in both of their arguments. So what does a pilgrim like me believe?
At the very end, Rabbi Singer says we have to start with the Hebrew Bible and then quotes Numbers 23:19 (2:02:00) My question is who wrestled with Jacob and changed his name to Israel?
I don't know why these debates even happen. There is just not enough time to saturate in explanation any one subject that arises in a debate like this. A discussion of such importance should be done in a radio show or podcast, with episodes numbering in the hundreds if not thousands.
CS Lewis also dealt with the legend. CS Lewis more or less said he had read about legends and said the gospels have never read as legend but as fact. He could tell the difference between 2 types of story. The other issue is even most secular scholars believe Jesus existed.
43:53 When Rabbi Singer highlights 1 Corinthians 15:3-4 highlighting "in accordance with the Scriptures" it is important to note that Paul is talking about many Scriptures. In General, the claim is that there are many Scriptures/ the entire OT that testify of Jesus. In Specific, since it is unspokenly requested, here are Scriptures pertaining to 1 Corinthians 15:3-4: Psalm 16:10; Isaiah 53:10. The claim of Jesus is that if you truly knew the Scriptures, you'd recognize Him, and therefore know the Father they claim to worship. It's all about Jesus.
I’m not a Christian anymore but I really enjoyed your debate with Tovia. Both of you guys were well equipped and very educated on the subjects at hand, but in contrast to his previous debates you were quite formidable, so kudos to you on that.
The reason the Messiah is Israel and can represent Israel is because He is the King of Israel! It's why monarchs can speak with the "royal we." Peter Gentry has a number of pertinent points in Isaiah that would help in this debate.
Israel is a man (Jacob). Israel is land. Israel is a people. Israel is a remnant. Israel is the Messiah. The word Israel is applied in so many unique ways, the fact any Jew would argue that the Messiah is not truly "Israel" is so bizarre.
Something odd in this debate: how come it's the Christian starting to ask questions to the rabbi? Why not the other way around? Christianity offers the answers to the world. Not Judaism.
Funny I see opposite for the last 30 years I have many Chrisitan friends who ask tons of questions just because I'm a Jew. most ask why I don't believe in messiah. So, I always reply with the same thing. The messiah is not a divine being and will not die. Then I show them in scripture. Deuteronomy 13:6-8 King James Version 6 If thy brother, the son of thy mother, or thy son, or thy daughter, or the wife of thy bosom, or thy friend, which is as thine own soul, entice thee secretly, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which thou hast not known, thou, nor thy fathers. 7 Namely, of the gods of the people which are round about you, nigh unto thee, or far off from thee, from the one end of the earth even unto the other end of the earth; 8 Thou shalt not consent unto him, nor hearken unto him; neither shall thine eye pity him, neither shalt thou spare, neither shalt thou conceal him: I tell them as you can see here the warning not to follow other gods that your father did not know. So when God reveled himself at Sinai jesus was not there. he was very specific Deuteronomy 4 12 And the Lrd spoke unto you out of the midst of the fire: you heard the voice of the words, but saw no image only heard a voice. again, saw no image 16 Lest you corrupt yourselves, and make you a graven image, the image of any figure, the likeness of male or female the likeness of anything 23 Take heed unto yourselves, lest you forget the covenant of the Lrd your Gd, which he made with you, and make you a graven image, or the likeness of anything, which the L_rd thy Gd hath forbidden you. 5 Unto thee it was shown, that thou mightest know that the Lrd he is Gd; there is none else beside him. 39 Know therefore this day, and consider it in thine heart, that the Lrd he is Gd in heaven above, and upon the earth beneath: there is none else Hosea 13:4 4 Yet I am the Lord thy God from the land of Egypt, and thou shalt know no god but me: for there is no saviour beside me. Joel 2:27 27 And ye shall know that I am in the midst of Israel, and that I am the Lord your God, and none else: and my people shall never be ashamed. Isaiah 44:6 Thus said the LORD, the King of Israel, Their Redeemer, the LORD of Hosts: I am the first and I am the last, And there is no God but Me. Deuteronomy 4:35 35 Unto thee it was shewed, that thou mightest know that the Lord he is God; there is none else beside him. Isaiah 48:12 12 Hearken unto me, O Jacob and Israel, my called; I am he; I am the first, I also am the last. None else one Echad they get and so do all the many people talked to becoming a Noachides
@@Pasture_Prime there is more than 144000 messianic Jews even wtihin Israel they tried to ban the Bible because many Jews converted , I can tell. My whole Family accepted Christ.. so I'm speaking about Facts and you?
he also said the dead will rise when the messiah comes, and he quotes Is 26 as proof. what is ironic, is that is exactly what the new testament says will happen when Jesus returns! *1 THESSALONIANS 4:15-17*
I watched this debate on Tovia's channel. I think you did speak very well, and he never answered the questions, but speaking Jew to tell us that if we don't speak Jew we are not God’s people and can't understand the scriptures. He's making the same mistake his ancestors did by denying Jesus as The Messiah. Question to the Jews: If you don't believe in Jesus being The Son of Man, who was The Son Of Man King Nebuchadnezzar saw in Daniel 3:24-24. I love what Paul said in Romans 10:1-5 🙏🏾
Hello! First Rabbi Tovia dosent need to answer your Question when you rellay on the new testament, wich for jews dosent worth nothing . But You can ask on the Old testament.. Christians really on the jews but the jews dont need to rellay on chrsitian as far they need to "proof" something . The Tora stand for its self. If you take out what is said in Tora you stay with nothing in your gospel. -Man was created In the image of god and not god was created in the image of man (like Christians do) I will check on daniel on return to you my answer. ❤
A right you probbley belive its jesus because its said the son of god .. Its have to be jesus how can it be other then him ? Well its an angel=son of god. But you dont hebrew so you translate it worng
How I wish Rabbi Singer ultimately know that Jeshua is really the Messiah in the Old Testament Bible. Wishing God will open his spiritual eyes. God bless Rabbi Singer.
If Christianity really were reading the original Hebrew text, they will really see how much idolatry they are in. May Aba YAHUWAH guide and protect you during this era Rabbi TobYah.
Keep it up, brother, I've watched a few minutes and I can tell you that debating is not the easiest task out there but I see you prepared well and put forth some good arguments so far, I have to watch the whole thing still. I think as a whole we as followers of the Jewish Messiah, have a task to prepare ourselves diligently so that we can understand how the blessed people of Israel thinks, and to be able to understand their counter arguments and be able to put forth a Biblical answer for the faith that we profess and believe is theirs also in Messiah Yeshua, may the Lord of Hosts bless them and may He let His face shine upon them. God bless!
Yes its not easy with orthodox but Jesus is the saviour zech 9 9 Ephesians 2 8 For By grace are ye saved through faith and that not of yourselves it is the gift of Gd not of works lest any should boast.
He really didn't address the Two Powers in Heaven issue did he? IMHO the burden is on him to show relationship between modern Judaism and ancient Judaism.
Hey, Jim. Yeah, I was a little disappointed! I wanted to hear Rabbi Singer's position on that issue. But he side-stepped and, instead, challenged whether Alan Segal (the Jewish scholar I had cited) was a "real" Jew. Rob
@Finn Lapp But surely it is recognized that Judaism is not practiced by anyone today as it was in the first century when the temple and priesthood existed?
At 33 minutes mr singer is talking about how everyone will follow the future/real messiah. As a Christian I believe Jesus is the real messiah but I understand some peoples don’t or won’t accept him as messiah. So when the future messiah comes according to Mr singer will not all Christian deny him because we believe messiah has already come. I’m just trying to understand his argument. Which ever way you look at it, from his understanding there’s no way all people will accept either Jesus or future messiah. Just me thinking out loud 🙏❤️
Hello elia. (Im a jew) I think when the jewish messiah will come it will be such inormens ivvent that no one can denay it. Also for the ethieist people. Dont worry . If think on of the reasons christianty came to the world, although its uncorrect , is to make humanity prepared for such huge evvent and the idea of Mashich You know when you see it . Hopefully bin our time.
@@yosefelianimusicchannel1070 according to Jewish understanding, the messiah had to come prior to the destruction of the second temple. How do reconcile that.
A professor trying to tell a Rabbi he doesn’t understand his Tanakh is mind blowing. You can tell the Rabbi is so passionate speaking about the book his ancestors preserved through thousands of years. Meanwhile the professor is trying to fit a Catholic book into the Hebrew Scriptures
the objection he used against the new testament can be used against him. he said all the things you believe to be true, is because the new testament told you. and that is a circular reasoning. well, that same argument can be used against him. because, everything he believes to be true is found from the torah. its the torah which told him God came down in a cloud and fire at mount Sinai. and that is the basis (the Sinai event) for Judaism. but the only source which tells us that this happened is the torah. which means he just fell in the circular reasoning he attacked the new testament by which means he is being dishonest. second, if he throws away the new testament whole sale as legend, then he would be forced to answer these five questions:- 1) how did Christianity start? 2) who started it? 2) where did it start? 3) how did it rapidly spread? 4) why were the Jews extremely hostile to it FROM THE VERY BEGINNING? because, there is a real religion called Christianity, its 2000 years old and it was extremely opposed by the rabbis from the very beginning. the only way you can explain these facts, is if the the new testament is historical. if the new testament was complete fiction, then you wouldn't be able to explain the reality of Christianity.
@@thatethiopiandude5077 I hear this from atheists all the time. the answer is simple that it amazes me how you miss it. you think RTS is dismissing the empirical proof for the NT which you are then using against the OT. in reality, he is saying that since we all agree that the OT is true, in order to prove the NT changes to judaism you need to provide the jews empirical evidence, which you cannot do by citing a book. your responses to the OT, that's its also only true because of the book and the belief in the father to son oral tradition is only an argument for someone who doesnt want to rely on the book and the father to son tradition - people such as atheists etc. jews and christians both trust the book and the oral tradition. that's why the professor's argument fails - he said that the resurrection is what saves the OT from biblical criticism. his attempt at using modern biblical criticism fails because it is not the resurrection that supports the OT - it is the jewish tradition. he apparently doesnt understand judaism. I want to know how he thinks all the jews including j followers believed in the torah prior to the resurrection? were they all just not smart and dont know epistomology?
The religion isn’t complete fiction, obviously it started at some point and was opposed by the Jews. How does that prove that the NT facts are historical?!
@Dustin Neely the Christian problem is that they also accept the Jewish tradition that they received the Torah at Sinai. (At least I think they do, I don’t know much about catholics). Therefore, the book can’t be used as proof, and neither can any Christian traditions, since they were opposed as false traditions by the Jews at the beginning. So while a Catholic can use his traditions to belief in his faith, he has no weapon in his quiver of which to use to converting Jews, and interestingly, the modern day Catholic Church isn’t busy converting jews (as far as I know). Furthermore, it’s not just a disagreement about the veracity of the Christian tradition that prevents jews from following it. Jews will maintain the Christian traditions to be a theological impossibility due to its contradictions of the written Torah. So while you are right that the sola scriptura people have a problem in the face of Judaism because of their lack of traditions, catholics have the second problem. Lastly, if you can inform me, the Jewish tradition is based on a national revelation which continued to have national revelations. Do catholics have a national revelation tradition?
@@proudpharisee5303 if he doesn't completely deny the empirical proof for the NT, he then has to deal with the evidence for the resurrection. but because he cannot, the way he deals with the evidence for the resurrection is by completely dismissing the new testament since you agreed that cannot be done, you are stuck with the proof for the resurrection
@5:20 Mr. Solberg, I won't hold you being a Gentile against you, but I will hold it against you if you think Mr. Singer is not a Gentile. The "Jewish" are not Jews, as explained below. They are mere "Jewish" Gentiles because they have no patrilineal registry. (See Ezra 2:62)
It is worth to notice that it’s hard to convince a Jew that Jesus is the messiah without evidence outside the Tanakh and Prof. Solberg does a very good job at giving evidence within and outside Tanakh. But if ones reject evidence outside Tanakh, then it is indeed hard to convince them that Jesus is the messiah. However it doesn’t mean we must strictly reject all evidence outside Tanakh! God give us mind to discern and we indeed can discern things is true or not even if its not written in the Tanakh. That’s what’s scholarship is all about and I can see why Prof. Solberg plea for us to look it from scholarship points of view, because scholarship doesn’t have to disagree with Tanakh, but Rabi Tovia acted as if scholarship is always against Tanakh. Let’s pray so that God lead us all to his truth, both from His living words of scripture and also from out ability to discern. Peace for yall! For Prof. Solberg: maybe you can maneuver your argument so someone can agree that scholarship doesn’t have to disagree with Tanakh? I think if there is a group of people who can make this maneuver, you are definitely one of them. Because I agree with Rabi Tovia that faith is not democracy and about headcount, on which christians and their magnitude really doesn’t appeal even for me, but credibility of scholarship is not the same with democracy on number (in my view) but Rabi Tovia clearly don’t think the same. How can we convice him, then? I have no idea…. I am looking up on you!
Thats the problem. Some see evidence of Jesus in the OT and some dont. Some see reincarnation in the bible and some dont. Knowing their is a case for Jesus. The best was to determine if he is the messiah is to simply put the book down and listen to what the world declares. No higher name than Jesus and no other name has been spoken of more by atheists buddhists hindus etc in regards to having visions in NDEs or OBEs of going into the light. Truth is found in the spiritual revelations always.
@@Yes-fe8ni Listening yo the world is a horrible way. God even warns of this. Be not like the nations around you, and talks about all the abominations they commit. Calling on the name of the LORD comes from Joel 2: 32 And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the LORD shall be delivered: The name is Gods name (Tetragrammaton) not Jesus. You can’t take that out and replace it with Jesus. Isaiah 45:23 again the LORD(Tetragrammaton) speaking That unto me every knee shall bow, every tongue shall swear. The New Testament again takes Gods name out and replaces it with Jesus. You can’t do this.
@@Christo-pv7eb i agree with you we shouldn’t follow the way of the world but it doesn’t mean we completely close our ear to listen for what people has to say. we first listen and then discern, then check it in light of teaching of Tanakh… now, most scholar agree that embarrassment of Jesus witnesses being woman is a evidence that these story is not just fabricated, but Rabi Tovia dodged it with story of Jezebel by implying that woman can become a witness to sth wrong, which is completely different case because Jezebel literally is the queen and we all know the only person more powerful than the King is The Queen (which is one of implicit message of the story) and the case with jesus witness is they are lowly woman, relative of and associated to an executed criminal, on which making a witness is not giving them any gain at all… this is the basis of resurrection of Jesus and we must have an open mind thinking that they are at least sincere then we check their sincerity and their story in light of Tanakh to see whether this is the truth or not. Now, I’m not saying that I agree with all current christology, but if we just open our heart a little with a discerning mind, the possibility of Jesus being the promised messiah is not far fetched fabricated story as most Rabi will frame it…
@@rioanantakeliat5170 Why do Christian’s always do this “open mind” crap? Do you honestly think the rabbi hasn’t checked into these claims? He knows the whole Bible better than you or me. Do you know I spent years on this topic? Do you think that whole time I was just being stubborn and foolish? Listen if there was a prophecy saying someone will die for your sins and the only way God will forgive you is if you believe in the death and resurrection then we’d believe it. But the messiah is supposed to bring peace and worldwide knowledge of God. He’s supposed to fear God, not be worshipped as God.
@@Christo-pv7eb Because without the open mindedness, all debate will back to square one. What christian really want is for the Jews to cross check the fact themselves. Even if at the end you still reject Jesus after you cross check your fact, we are happy to see that! However, what most rabbi does is tell their follower to not even touch the new testament, don't read it, etc. If you spent your due diligence to research and check your faith, good for you and God will indeed give you your reward! Problem is people are often not even allowed to think, which is in itself is problematic at least for me. Again, my Jewish brother, I would be much more happy to hear you reject Jesus after you done your research, than just blindly following rabbi told you don't read this don't read that. That's the answer to your question why Christian beg for Jewish people open mindedness, because truth to be told, what is the only book is not accessible in the land of Israel? And why is that? Is it because all people agree upon it, or its just because the rabbi told them so? You can see Rabi Tovia always dodge the thing if we going toward this direction and framing this kind of open-mindedness is dangerous. Well, it is dangerous I agree with that, especially from rabbinical perspective, and if it is indeed wrong, many people at risk to be lead astray. However, I think it is a fair price to pay if you want to get to the truth, and the Rabbi not letting people check by themselves (by dodging all these things) is something I don't agree with. Just give them the cautions, but do not do it in a misleading way! There is no other documents on the face of the earth that the Rabbis really treat with hostility like the new testament... This fact on itself is something that we really need to examine, why is that? Isn't that intriguing?
Good job, Ron! I thought you did well in this debate, I just wish you addressed the fact that all nations do not know that Jesus is the Christ, and not just the most popular religion.
The fact that not all nations know Jesus is a proof that he is not the messiah because when the messiah comes everyone on earth will know the one true God and no one will have to teach anyone about him because they will know. So all evangelism, Bible schools, different religions, atheism is a proof that Jesus wasn’t the messiah
@@mikeprew ironically that's exactly why Jews don't believe Jesus is the Messiah (among other reasons). In the Old Testament, the Messianic Prophecies and requirements to be the Messiah state that the person must bring world peace and all will know him. Nothing about a Second Coming (that's only in the New Testament). The Jewish Messiah is supposed to bring world peace and world knowledge of him in his first time arrival (not a second or third or fourth etc time. The FIRST TIME) according to Judaism and the OT. The NT admits that Jesus failed to do this and needs to use the excuse of a "second time". Jesus failed to bring world peace and global knowledge of him the first time, and so now there is the excuse that "he'll get it right the second time". Whether or not Jesus will come back or he will get it right the second time is irrelevant, because by failing to do so the FIRST TIME, he has already failed the Messianic Prophecies of the OT and Judaism.
@@YokaiX you can interpret His second coming as an excuse or whatever, but I really do disagree with that notion. The Hebrew Bible does seem to display seemingly contradicting depictions of the anointed One. Micah 5 says that He will be born in Bethlehem while Daniel 7 seemingly indicates the Christ as divine. Isaiah 9 says He will be reign forever while Daniel 9 says He will be cut off. You probably think Isaiah 53 speaks of Israel, but it speaks of a suffering servant who will bear the sins of people and be killed. All of these seemingly contradictory statements made in the TaNaKh can be understand when putting it into a Christian context. It is true that the entire world does not recognize Jesus as the anointed one, but I don't think it's ad hoc or moving the goalposts to say that this will happen at His second coming- I find it reasonable and not a strong enough reason to reject Yeshua as the mashiach.
I see he blames Christian countries for the holocaust, maybe he could acknowledge that Hitler was not Christian and 2 Christian countries liberated many of the camps.
Yes. Before the holocaust there were pogroms in Europe against the Jews, by Christians. Jesus loving Christians. Also the Catholic Church permitted the holocaust.
[part 2 contniuation...] so, once we have established the suffering servant to be the messiah, lets ask some questions 1) is there any place in the entire hebrew bible where the whole nation of Israel or its righteous remnant are portrayed as a shoot and/or a root which sprouts forth (atsmakh)? 2) is there any incident where the suffering of the whole nation of Israel or its righteous remnant resulted in healing for the gentile nations? (because that is what the suffering of the servant does Is 53:5) 3) is there any moment where Israel became a sin offering for the nations? or was it itself in need of a cure for its sin? Once this is out of the way, lets examine his claim of falsifiability. the rabbi claims, all of the things done by Christ are unfalsifiable. so therefore they cannot be used as evidence to establish his messiahship. but this is wrong in light of Is 53. lets examine that passage:- "He was assigned a grave with the wicked, and with the rich in his death, though he had done no violence, nor was any deceit in his mouth." (Is 53:9) here it clearly says the suffering servant (The Messiah) will die and be buried in a grave (the hebrew qavar) this is a clear prophecy about the messiah dying. we know why he is going to die. as an atonement for the sins of Israel and the world. that is explicitly stated in Is 53:5-8. in fact, he is said to be an offering for sin (asham) in v.10. an offering for sin is a sacrifice done for the purpose of the forgiving of sin (Lev 5:7 for instance) so the messiah will die, so that our sins will be atoned for. But, after he dies, it says he shall see the light of life and be satisfied "After the suffering of his soul, he will see the light [of life] and be satisfied; by his knowledge my righteous servant will justify many, and he will bear their iniquities." Is 53:11 (even though the dead sea scrolls and the Septuagint have the phrase "the light of life" the masoretic doesn't) *HOW CAN HE SEE THE LIGHT IF LIFE AND BE SATISFIED, AFTER HE HAD DIED? AFTER HE HAD BEEN BURIED?* The only way he can see the light of life again and be satisfied after he died, is if he came back to life. is if he was resurrected. that is the only way he can see the light of life after he had been dead and buried. so that is the criteria to identify the true messiah *ANY MESSIAH CLAIMANT WHO CLAIMS TO DIE FOR THE SINS OF THE WORLD, AND THEN COMES BACK TO LIFE AFTER HIS DEATH AND BURIAL, IS THE TRUE MESSIAH* a resurrection is not something that can be faked. either he rose from the dead or not. and according to the chronology given by the prophet, the messiah must suffer and die first, then raise from the dead. any person who didn't rise from the dead is not the messiah. so singer's polemic false flat to the ground. we know Jesus will fulfill the rest of the messianic prophecies, because he fulfilled the most important one. he died for the sins of the world, and then he rose from the dead. as the prophet said he would. the proof for it all is the resurrection we can even go further, in Is 53:3-4 the suffering servant is considered as someone smitten of God by his own people. we know the speakers are the jewish people, because in v.8 the speaker who is the prophet, says he was stricken for the transgressions of *MY PEOPLE* that is what the speakers said in v.5. they said he (the servant) was wounded for our transgression. proving the speakers are the people of the prophet. meaning the jewish people the jewish people thought this servant was smitten and cursed by God. but in reality he was the arm of God, the servant of God who had died for their sin. meaning, who ever the true messiah is, he must initially be rejected by the jewish people. the jewish people must consider him as someone cursed and smitten by God. any messiah claimant, who wasn't rejected and considered as smitten by God by the Jewish people is not the true messiah. the true messiah, must be considered by the jewish people as cursed and smitten by God finally, in Is 53:1-2 the suffering servant is called the arm of The Lord. this means he has an ontological oneness with God. just as an arm and the rest of the body are of one flesh, God and the messiah are of one deity. that is why he is equated and depicted as a body part of God. which means he is God, he is divine. that is why he is called Jehovah/YHVH our righteousness (Jer 23:5-6) The God/Elohim who has an eternal throne (Psal 45:6) the mighty God (Is 9:6-7) the one who comings-forth is from eternity (Mic 5:2) the Lord in heaven (Psal 110:1) so whoever the the true messiah is, he must be someone who claimed to be God in the flesh (because the messiah is human too, a physical descendant of David and Abraham) any messiah claimant, who doesn't claim to be God in the flesh is not the true messiah *CONCLUSION* 1) THE MESSIAH MUST DIE FOR THE ATONEMENT OF OUR SIN 2) HE MUST COME BACK TO LIFE AFTER HIS DEATH AND BURIAL 3) HE MUST BE REJECTED BY HIS PEOPLE FIRST 4) HE MUST CLAIM TO BE GOD IN THE FLESH *who does that sound like......?* tovia singer refuted
I've seen him pop up on social media thru the years and I watched several until I felt physically ill from the multitude of his blatent and horrendous lies about Christians, deceitfulness, psychological manipulation, arrogance, and gaslighting his followers. It's wretched. He says in this debate, he used to hate Christians... Well I hope that's true, obviously, but I doubt the "used to" part. He goes on saying we don't believe certain books and implies authors are lying... He lumps all Christians into his hateful slander that might be true for certain people claiming to be Christian but they don't testify for me and I'm offended by his continual lies and mockery. Some of his group setting were the worst I saw. Lying about us, tons of false claims about what we believe and false claims saying we don't use certain texts or we change our texts, all kinds of blasphemy, and laughing at us, mocking Jesus, making strawman arguments and laughing... Everything's so funny to him. I pray God gets him serious with open eyes, ears and heart of flesh not stone. That he repent and turn from his wicked ways and see truth. In Jesus name amen and amen
You did a great job solberg. I can tell Singer just absolutely loves the spotlight, so much so that he often comes off like a used car salesman lol. Solberg came off consistently sincere and witty, I hope you battle again soon.
Are you serious with your assessment? Rabbi Singer absolutely schooled this professor, so much so that the professor needed cards to read from. This wasn't really a debate to begin with - this was more along the lines of a student vs teacher.......🤣
@Paul Sandberg you just conceded that nowhere is the coming king ever called "messiah" in the bible. So why do you ask me to show you the word messiah in passages i claim are messianic????? since all messianic prophecies do not have the name messiah, why do you expect the passages i quote as messianic to have the name messiah????
@@flyingcat7975 lool There were Jews who were expecting that the Messiah is the incarnation of the Archangel Metatron who is called Sar Ha Panim , Son of man ( that Jesus usually refers himself to ) , the Logos ( a divine being) as per Philo of Alexandria , ... There is even a Jewish Machzor for Rosh Hashanah that mentions " Yeshua Sar Ha Panim " ( which is already omitted in some Machzor , some say it is Yeshua ben Yotzadak but the kabbalist Yehudah Liebes affirms that it's "Yeshua ha notzri") based on the fact that earlier Jewish believers , had this idea that the Messiah is the Angel of the Lord mentioned multiple times in the Tanach. The one who sits on the 2nd throne in heaven ! In a discussion between R' Akiva and R' Yose of Galilea ,based on Dan 7:9-10, R'Akiva said that the first throne is for Hashem and the second throne for the Messiah which R' Yose of Galilea opposed strongly , may be due to the fact that it has already started to become a heresy within Judaism .
You said that Yahshua agreed with Hillel on Lev.19:18 the the substance of the Torah is LOVE yet your whole ministry is against those who desire to walk out love in their every day life by walking as Messiah walked in the Torah. Sound hypocritical. “Become imitators of me, as I also am of Messiah.” 1 Corinthians 11:1
@@tbishop4961 Complicated,no. hard to actually do, yes. And if you do them that’s works salvation according to most. That’s only half of it, the half towards showing love for mankind. The other half of the equation is loving God and showing it in our actions. Both loving God and loving mankind has been belittled to just believing and saying you do because if you actually walk out what you confess then you might be labeled as a hieratic for doing “works to be saved“ even though that’s not the case it doesn’t matter to those who don’t do what they confess.
@@ForgedinTruth the road is being widened by this type of thinking. I wondered if there was anyone out there that saw it this way. You will never reach the orthodox when you and your version of messiah goes against deut 13 and the law of God.
@@ForgedinTruth well if someone says you don’t have to keep the commandments that God told us to walk in then it goes against it. People who come against other people who follow the commands don’t want to walk in the way. Deuteronomy 13 says the prophet that leads you away from following Him should not only not be followed but they should be stoned. Not that I am advocating for anyone’s stoning :) I actually like rob solberg. I liken listening to his arguments.
Brother Solberg, I know you’re a very knowledge person, I’m following all your videos and stuff, because I love the way you talk, but you’re lacking a little bit of boldness amon your statements, I would like to hear in this debate you’re talking about Jesus Christ, the Lord, and savior, with all passion like the Juwish guy did about Jahweh
The Rabbi thinks Isaiah was one single author who wrote it in one go?? Literally no scholar worth their salt thinks that. The dude also sounds like the Cowardly Lion so that cracks me up, the Jews are always so full of themselves. Their pride over their legalism is their very downfall and why they denied their own savior.
Prof. Solberg I love how what u say is super informative. Your words are backed up and u don’t contradict yourself by speaking a lot of unnecessary words. I love how u don’t condemn others or mock people. I really enjoyed ur closing remarks also. I appreciate you and how u spread God’s word and love. Peace be with you both.
That means a lot to me, Nickie. Thank you!!
Blessings, Rob
Great debate. Ex Muslim converted Christian here declaring JESUS IS GOD.
First time on this channel and it’s owned my subscription.
I'm glad you found us, Jamal! Blessings, Rob
👏🙏🙌
@@ScalpNinjaTrader You have truly overcome more than I ever will. Richest blessing to you my Christian friend.
Jesus is a man and NOT GOD , ex christian convert to Islam
God is One but Jesus Christ is not God.
Thank you so Much Mr Solberg for Your Contributions in God's Work
Your teachings help me a lot personally.
May Our Gracious lord Yeshua Use you more and more For his Glory ❤
Prof Rob, I want to thank you for such a great job you have done for Yeshua. I was very impressed by your perfomance! God bless brother!
Thank you, sir! Blessings, Rob
I really enjoyed this debate! Thank you to both gentlemen. I recently found R.L Solberg’s ministry and I am really grateful for it! Keep it up.🙏🏻👍
Thanks, Kendall! Blessings, Rob
In hindsight, I think Soleberg could have made a better argument, with making less compliments. But I’m only a student of the Bible
@@TheBiblicalRoots If New David fears YHWH, then he can't be YHWH. Isaiah 11:1-3. David will be YHWH's servant. Jer 33:26, Eze 34:23, 37:24. Which means he isn't YHWH. Is YHWH his own servant and does he fear himself? Of course not. Whatever David may be, he isn't YHWH. He will only be the the servant of YHWH.
@@__Man_ Then you do not believe John 1:1
Shalom! I'm a Jew and I wanted to share my amazing testimony! We Jews are waking up to the truth! czcams.com/video/8ptOI_x2UlY/video.html
I’m at the closing statement right now. I enjoyed this debate. God bless you sir!
I wish Rabbi Tovia Singer the best and I pray Jesus will reveal himself to him in person.
And may God bless, you, Popoola! Thanks for watching. ~Rob
Rob I’ve watched your videos for a while now and I want to say you are always so kind and loving no matter who you’re talking to or what subject. Your tone never changes and you desire to share the gospel remains your most important message! Thank you, God bless you!
Thank you so much! Blessings, Rob
What a great respectful mature exchange of beliefs was made at this 'debate'. Thank you both and everyone who made it possible and made it available so widely.
As a Christian I come away with greater respect for the Jewish perspective without losing an iota of faith and belief that Yeshua is the promised Messiah.
As Prof. Rob summarised, the evidence of Jesus life, crucifixion and resurrection is testimony to old testament scripture, not opposition to it.
Rabbi and Professor I have immense respect for both of you.
Thankyou.
This is amazing that Jews want to debate this topic! I love your love for Jesus and our awesome salvation message!
In this whole 2 hour debate, one key event caught my attention. One thing that really set apart the true and the false between the two speakers:
one was humble and genuine enough to pray to God before speaking, while the other never even thought about it.
One demonstrated a relationship with God while the other thinks he has.
Rabbi Tovia Singer can not understand any truth you share Professor Solberg, as he can not appreciate anything that is explained to him. His ears become deaf, his eyes are blinded to the merits of the true doctrine of Jesus Christ, and everyone who knows our Messiah Yeshua gets the distinct impression that this person's heart has indeed been sealed and that he is blind leading the blind. See Isaiah 29. We pray for our enemies, those who harm us in differing ways and we forgive them for their transgressions upon us.
Rabbi Tovia Singer should tell you all about
Psalm 2:12
12 Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way, when his wrath is kindled but a little. Blessed are all they that put their trust in him.
Your channel is like a breathe of fresh air
Thanks, D.K.!
Wow, I’m glued to my seat just listening. This is probably the best debate I’ve ever seen.
Tovia Singer has some great linguistic techniques that serve as great walls in a debate, very impressive. You did really well, this is the first I've seen of you. Both of you are good communicators.
Thanks, Michael!
Singer is one of the best for saying so much while saying absolutely nothing!
right! he rarely hit any point that prof made he just rejected them or reworded them
He seriously is recycling jokes and rebuttals from other debates I’ve seen. I’ve not finished yet, but he’s yet to answer the objections put before him.
😂🎯
No. He clearly rebutted them. Give me one point he didn't address, and I'll tell you, concisely, bis rebuttal
@@davidgrossman7965 He literally dodged everything he said. He's a false teacher and gets called out for it by multiple scholars and Rabbis
We need a part 2 🙏🏾🙏🏾 God bless you guys
Rabbi Singer is a fulfillment of Isaiah 6:10
Congratulations from France, I am a follower of rabbi Tovia Singer, and I have already watched the debate on his channel, I really appreciated the quality of your arguments, your sense of humor and your ability to always remain calm in defending your points of view, which unfortunately is not always the case in this type of debate. Thank you very much for this very interesting debate.
Thank you, Federo! Blessings, Rob
I know that rob is calm when he debates, but rabbi tovia singer appears to be misleading and at times deceitful, and I have no problem addressing how deceitful he is and will give him examples. He was shocked at the way rob debated him. The problem I have with rob is that he distinguishes the law of God from the law of Moses, and I do call him out on it.
Tovia Singer is not a Jew. None of the semites who claim to be Jews are Jews. Ask him to prove he is a Jew...he can't. All he can prove is that they are semites which are descendents of Canaan. Liars...every one of them.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but wasn’t it the Jews that wrote the “Christian Bible”? Does Rabbi Singer know that?@@TheBiblicalRoots
There is no such thing as a christian bible. Remember this, that the Gospel is the life of Yeshua and his purpose. The Acts of the Apostles has to do more with the lives of the Apostles, disciples, the body of Yeshua, and the Epistles are letters of correction. Revelation is a book of prophecy.
Another thing is that you continue to lend your ears to rob. You are allowing yourself to be engraved with some of his distorted teachings on certain topics.
This was a great and civil discussion. I have been greatly blessed by the dialogue here, from both Singer & Solberg.
I am a Torah-observant follower of Messiah, drawn to observe Solberg's work to test my own faith, convictions, and actions. I think it is beautiful when we can come together as beloved followers of the Most High El of Abraham, Isaac, & Jacob.
I just watched the debate a second time. I love your energy Rob. During the cross-examination you could see and feel your focus, you did your homework and were prepared. Amazing, it carried over into your closing argument. I didn't want your time to end. Here we are still after over 2,000 yrs talking about a back woods Rabbi, awesome , loved you phrased it that way. Not what you said exactly but true to the point you were making. Again as I've said before your desire and love for the Truth is evident. I'm inspired to be better in my pursuit of Truth in my studies of scripture and also witnessing. God Bless 🙏
Thank you, David! I really appreciate your kinds words. Blessings, Rob
@Mich Ebb I doubt there are any Jewish people who would claim to be God, or to say that they are atoning, a ransom, for the sins of anyone.
Rob you did great Job man! Bless you from Texas
Thank you, Sing! -Rob
@@TheBiblicalRoots At about 43 minutes, Tovia made a claim about Paul quoting nonexistent scripture. I never caught a response from you(???). Also, what are your thoughts on his closing argument that Christianity being the most widespread religion proves it is the wrong religion/faith according to scripture? I started following your page because most of my friends have either adopted the Progressive/New Age “Christianity” or Torah Observance. Thanks so much for your videos. ☺️
@@sammyroscher5921 I’m Torah observant and I watch Rob all the time. We have disagreements but I see him as a brother in the faith and I have a lot of respect for him because of this debate.
I wanted to attempt to answer your questions if that would be okay. As for Paul, I do not believe he was quoting a specific verse but rather he was referring to the entirety of the the Old Testament scriptures.
The topic of the majority is a good argument until you remember that the promise to Abraham was that his descendants would be numbered like the stars in the sky.
@@hosea4660 And Jesus confirms it with a parable, Lu 13:18-19 (NASB), "So He was saying, “What is the kingdom of God like, and to what shall I compare it? “It is like a mustard seed, which a man took and threw into his own garden; and it grew and became a tree, and THE BIRDS OF THE AIR NESTED IN ITS BRANCHES.”
Rabbi Singer avoids answering direct questions. Why would anyone want to debate/ discuss anything with such a person.
Changing Rabbi Singer's mind was actually my fourth priority, Samuel. The top priority was sharing the Gospel of Jesus with tens of thousands of people in a way they may never have heard before, showing how it is completely connected to (and grounded in) the Tanakh. The second priority was to present a compelling biblical and intellectual case for the Messiahship of Jesus to the listeners. The third priority was to "put a pebble in the shoe" of skeptical listeners who _thought_ they knew who this Jesus character was; I wanted to leave them with a nugget or two to chew on. The distant fourth priority was convincing Rabbi Singer. But I do still pray for his eyes to be opened to his Messiah!
Shalom, Rob
@@TheBiblicalRoots I appreciate your work, to God be the glory!
I say this in kindness and a loving tone which I don't want misunderstood by being in text, but... I was unsettled in the spirit when you prayed for God to bless him and gave promotion of his books. Why pray for God to bless and increase the wolves actively devouring the flock?
Kindness, love your neighbor, honorable debate, respect... Yup absolutely, but don't wonder why your flock is dwindling or you find them slaughtered about, when your blessing the wolves with food and their packs increase and circle about.
I just couldn't stop this vision pressed upon me each time this happened.
Still, this was the best debate I've seen with him, he's nearly unbearable to watch but I really learned a lot from you. He really didn't answer anything though. Great job! You definitely won the debate though I know it didn't matter either way. I'm just claiming it for Jesus! 😆👍💯
In his effort to disprove Christianity, Singer is dismantling Judaism. No one does more to disprove Judaism than Tovia Singer
I just wanted to say thank you Prof Solberg for agreeing to this debate. And for treating it with respect. Our Rabbi had nothing but good things to say about you when we met up in Dallas. I only wish perhaps in a future time you could discuss subjects like this without the timer. So many things that could've been said weren't. And it just seemed when you and our dear Rabbi were sitting and talking back and forth, more comparisons were made. Again thank you, and may Hashem bless you and your family.
Thank you, Yasmin! I agree, a lot was left unsaid. But I really enjoyed my time getting to know Rabbi Singer before and during the debate. Blessings, Rob
Yes, a lot was unsaid, but a lot was unanswered as well, and I am referring to rabbi tovia singer in the unanswered comment. He was prevented from distorting the Brit-Chadashah because God stopped him from bringing it up, leaving him in the Tanakh so that Yeshua could be shown in the Tanakh. By the way, using jokes is part of his tactic to draw people toward him, but being that he was stopped from discussing the Brit-Chadashah, he had to double up on his jokes. I am sorry to say this, but he appears to be very arrogant.
@Sundown Sam Well, actually I could have said the same about Prof. Solberg who used just as much humor and his own methods of distracted distortion to present his case. That's how debate works. If that's a problem for you they were both guilty of doing it. I could argue that Prof. Solberg intentionally consumed most of the Rabbi's time so he didn't get to ask more than one question. Was that fair? Yes, because a debate is like having a theological battle. Singer imho was too nice and allowed the Prof to have more time when he should've reminded them earlier that the Prof. time for asking questions was up.
I'm assuming you saw the entire video, so do you recall what Prof. Solberg said about owning both of Rabbi Singer's books? That means that Solberg knows exactly what Rabbi Singer's response to a couple points would've been, so why would the Rabbi waste words on something that would've eaten up probably 10 minutes of the debate time? I would've done the same thing and picked what I felt was the more pertinent things to mention while ignoring the things I didn't see as important.
That's why I think it would be really informative to have an untimed discussion between the Rabbi and the Prof, where there isn't a timer so they could have a more relaxed, round table sort of discussion. The only problem is that might take days to do so there would have to be some sort of cut off, but it would still be good imho.
You didn't bring up what you thought was an unanswered comment, so I'm not sure we're looking at the same things, but from my perspective, the unanswered comments are actually answered in Rabbi Singer's book vol 1 of Let's Get Biblical.
Not that I am defending rob because I do have problems with his views on some issues, but rob did not use jokes to shy away from responding to questions. That is not the way debates should be, but it appears they try to work it that way to avoid responding, and this is the tactic Rabbi Tovia Singer appears to be using in all of his debates. Yes, I have a problem with that because it appears that jokes are used as camouflage to avoid responding to questions. The reason rabbi tovia singer was too nice was because he was stopped from bringing up the Brit-Chadashah and that is what he is good at distorting. Not to mention, he was caught off guard; he probably rob to be that prepared.
About rob picking up two of rabbi tovia singer's books shows that he entered the debate prepared and there is nothing wrong with that.
I do agree with you on the debates. In the future, there should be a moderator to make sure a question is responded to before asking another question or changing topics.
@Sundown Sam There was a moderator. It was the person who introduced them.
As for Singer's jokes, what can I say. I don't read minds, but I don't see them as a means to avoid answering questions. Jews and humor are like peas in a pod. When the world is worrying about life, we're joking about it and finding ways to make it easier until things get better.
If you want to see them as a bad thing, that's your choice. I feel sorry for someone who hates humor yeesh, life must be really tense for you.
Did I say there was anything wrong with Solberg's buying a copy of Singer's books? However if he really did read them, why did he ask a simple question when the answer is already in the book? What would be the point to ask questions you already know the answer to? Unless it was intended to stall and divert attention from the real topic. I'll have to watch the video again I guess.
Nothing stopped Singer from bringing up anything about the supposed Brit-Chadashah as you call it. It didn't have anything to do with the topic.
Btw, are you talking about the ברית חדשׁה (barit Chadash) mentioned in Jeremiah 31:31? I think you put an extra -ah on it. Just thought you'd like to know. And that's talking about the covenant God will make with the house of Israel and the house of Judah. Which Singer has talked about several times, but again it had nothing to do with the topic they were discussing.
And in case you'd like to know read the verse. The text says that the days come (that means in the future), says Hashem, that I will make a new covenant (brit hadash) with the house of Israel and the house of Judah; (this is one half of the entire statement btw, not the whole thing).
Who was the house of Israel and who was the house of Judah? The house of Israel as it's mentioned several times in the bible, was what the northern kingdom was called. It consisted of 10 tribes, who went off the path as we call it and started picking up the practices from the pagan nations around them. Their wickedness grew worse and worse, so God sent them into exile.
BUT Jeremiah prophesied that the lost kingdom which consisted of most of the 10 tribes will be returned in the end days. Further instead of two kingdoms God will unite them with Judah. Which will be one kingdom as it was in the beginning.
So to know if there is a new covenant yet between the house of Israel and the house of Judah, we first have to ask is have the 10 tribes returned to the land of Israel? That answer is no. So there is no new covenant yet. I won't confuse you with the facts of what the new covenant is, but read Jeremiah 31:31-34. Or the whole chapter if you like.
Anyway, the subject of the debate was about whether Jesus was the promised Jewish messiah. Not whether God made a new covenant or not. Hope that helps you understand why the Rabbi probably chose to stay on topic instead of going off on a side subject.
Jesus está vivo. Ele me salvou! Aleluia!
Aleluia, Queleu!
Shalom, Rob
Alleluia
paz y vida bendecida amigo(
Prof Solberg, I am not a Christian but you debated like a true gentleman and professional.
Thanks, Michael! Blessings, Rob
Prof Solberg is bright but he got rocked. However, here are some points R Singer could have been more clear and confident on.
1. There was not a single Jew in the 2nd temple period, Philo included, who thought that Gods supernal wisdom was an uncreated divine person. Philos "logos" is created, the kabbalists chochma ilaa is created, Proverbs 8 tells us all of this explicitly. Jesus was claiming to be an incarnation of Gods wisdom, but definitely not God himself. See Tertullian against praxeas, where he specifically states that Jesus was a created being whos will and power was completely nullified by father, the one true God, which created him.
2. the angel of the Lord "stuff". Haggai 1, the prophet is called the angel of the Lord. I guess Haggai is God too, now, huh? No, angel means angel. How about when Moses says "I am the Lord your God", is Moses God? Some 2nd temple writings call Moses the God-man, so I guess they meant that literally, huh? No. How about Joshua 24? Is Samuel God? Is Israel God (Is. 45:14 Israel is yeishtahavu, literally worshipped)? NO! Only God is God because He is one, where as everything in creation, Jesus included, are not. We are finite, He is infinite, etc.
@@MrMaxSkorpion your second point is fallacious. We know that angel can refer to messenger. However in certain "angel of the LORD" passages there are clear references to the angel of YHWH seemingly claiming deity. Gen 16:7-14, 22:11-15, Jud 13:3-22. It must be taken on a verse by verse basis. There are more passages I could cite to.
@@mikeprew1. Jude is not in the bible because God did not inspire it.
2. It's literally your OPINION that the angel claims deity. You should try rereading my original comment. The fact that an angel is called "god" would only be germain if the God of Israel were the only person called "god", which isnt true in the Hebrew bible or the NT.
@@MrMaxSkorpion You are mixed up.
*Angel means messenger and when the Lord of hosts is sent by the Lord of hosts as in Zechariah 2:8-11 he becomes the Angel of the Lord but he's the Lord himself.*
*Only God is God because he is ONE Trinity as in, **_"Hear O Israel, the Lord (1), our God (2), the Lord (3) echad."_*
*Jesus is the God of Israel aka the Angel of the Lord, the Word of the Lord, the Name of the Lord, the Arm/Hand of the Lord, etc.*
*Jesus is referred to as God's servant Israel in Isaiah 49:1-7 and other scriptures because he will come in human form by being born to the virgin from the house of David and in him will be realized the blessings and promises given to Jacob/Israel.*
*Similarly, the Messiah Jesus is referred to as David in messianic prophecies because he is a fulfillment of the promises God made to King David.*
I'm surprised Singer even showed up. He runs scared when Michael Brown refutes him
Singer is the man! He owned this debate.
Now that would be a good debate to watch if he ever does. 😊
Rob, Thank you for your patience in debating with people who close their bible at the end of Malachi and proudly choose to remain in darkness. In contrast, in great humility, Jesus showed He was truly the light of the world. I think the fact that Rabbi Tovia Singer refuses any future debate with Dr Michael Brown speaks volumes...
You are so awesome! You won this debate and did it with so much grace and kindness.
The almighty rabbi Singer did not look so mighty after this debate you can see several tactics have been exposed. great work prof. Solberg hurray
Thanks, Samantha!
Says the christians thieves.
Wow I love you calmness that’s only from the Holy Spirit !
Rabbi Tova has heard many debate but he still blind not only is he blind but angry too!
I hope the rabbi comes to know that Jesus loves him
Who??
Professor Solberg was so humble, and kind …he’s a great representative for what Jesus teaches us to be. Not to mention he spoke the truth and was able to back up what he was saying. The rabbi did not seem to show Christians the same love and kindness though, but rather mocked Christian’s and he behaved very smug IMO and like he thinks he’s better. Plus he deflected questions being asked of him and made accusations without backing them up. He also left out the word “and” from Isaiah 44:1….
1Yet now hear, O Jacob my servant; and Israel, whom I have chosen:
It’s really important not to add or take away words, since it then changes the meaning.
This was a very interesting debate indeed. The one thing that was a bit irritating, is that Rabbi Singer tried to ignore the elephant in the room, namely the fact that his interpretation of the scriptures are not necessarily the same as quite a few of the Jewish Rabbis in ancient times' were (specifically referring to the interpretation of Isaiah 53). Rabbi Singer claimed that we should ONLY consult the scriptures, and forget about how ancient Rabbis interpreted Isaiah 53. If this is truly the way, why does Rabbinic Judaism, insist that Jewish people NEVER read the Tanakh without Rabbinical (men's) interpretation? Other than this obvious hypocrisy, I have to thank both parties for being respectful and mostly kind towards each other.
Even if there was a non-rabbinical reading of the Bible, it wouldn't in any way coincide with the Christian misinterpretation of literal Hebrew words.
This is infact a great debate held between two gentleman.
One thing Rabbi Singer is missing and that Professor Solberg didn't mention is the precious born-again experience that only occurs when one repents and accepts Jesus as their personal Saviour. A miracle of rebirth that occurs in the human heart by the power of the Holy Spirit. Like the gospel song said "if God is dead, who's this living in my soul?"
Amen! That is very true.
Not everyone has a miracle experience like u say u did. So God plays favorites when saving people? Exactly why your belief is unfounded and your faith based on how it makes you feel. No thanks!
@@openigangWho said anything about feelings?
The New Birth experience and further experiences are what kept me in the Christian faith. However I also realised that I accepted a lot of doctrinal errors because I falsely assumed that this experience validates everything the church teaches.
Unfortunately, what often happens, is, that Christians who are led by the Holy Spirit and read scripture, see that some passages don’t agree with the church teachings. However they are being told not to trust the guidance of the spirit and should rather follow the church teachings. Soon they become dependent on the church for insight and learn to filter out anything that doesn’t agree.
Thank you for sharing! This was a real eye opener for me, to see what Yeshua was up against- lack of faith and then disbelief in the face of so many miracles, let alone fulfillment of prophecies.😢
Rob my family appreciates you and we’re praying for you man. Thank you
Thank you, Mason! Shalom, Rob
@@TheBiblicalRoots You were embarrassing, to say the least. Stop kidding yourself.
The Rabbi failed to read Hosea 6:2 when stating that Paul’s comment in 1 Corinthians 15 was invented. Also Isaiah 53 states that Messiah would die for our sins. Paul did reference scripture correctly, Yeshua is the Messiah Amen.
Mr. Tovia Singer if the servant in Isai 53 is the nation Israel as you claim
Question
1. V8 - "for the transgression of my people was he stricken", if "my people" here refers to Israel, God's people, then who is the"he" (The servant) that is stricken?
2. V9- If the "he" mentioned here is Israel as you claim, has the nation Israel not done violence and deceit? The Tanakh is full of Israel's violence and deceit.
3. V10 - How can the soul of sinful Israel be accepted by God as sin offering?
4. V11 - If the servant is Israel, whose iniquities does israel bear?
5. V12 - How did the nation Israel make intersession for the transgressors?
Great questions!!! I bet he's to scared to even try answering. He'll make lame jokes, mock Christianity and cry about Christians reading books regardless if we actuality read or bring them up which... Who cares? Then laugh and blab on about unrelated topics. I really wanted him to give an answer for Isaiah 53 at least, but he couldn't give an answer.
He's all over the place and the status of the debate for Singer... is directly proportional to the state of his soul.
😧👎LOST.
Isiah 49 you can see two servants there ISRAEL and the One who rescues ISRAEL which it the suffering sevant❤
At 44 minutes mr singer says Paul made up verses. Paul makes the claim to have received revelation from the risen Jesus. Jesus said the only sign that would be given is the sign of Jonah. We know from the scriptures that Jonah was in the belly of the fish for 3 days. We know from the gospels that Jesus was in the heart of the earth for 3 days. This is the connection paul and was making 🙏❤️
3 days and 3 nights......Jeseus was not in the heart of the earth for 3 nights
@@beng7431 if you read the story of Jonah you read that Jonah says “I cried out of the belly of hell”. Just as Jesus died on the cross Jonah died in the belly of the fish. This is the connection Jesus made with Jonah.
Sorry but Its doesnt prove nothin
This was a great debate. The comments here are very respectable to both. The comments on Singers channel, not so much.
There are not. many Christian scholars who would agree to a public debate with Rabbi Singer. It was amazing to see how he can quote from the entire bible without any notes in English and Hebrew. I have watched his live broadcasts on his Facebook Chanel and I always learn so much. Thank you both for being so respectful.
There are many who would have no problem debating rabbi tovia singer, and the majority of them probably would not be scholars. You appear to think that one needs to have a biblical degree to debate rabbi tovia singer. Another thing is that the Holy Spirit is the one who teaches according to what God made clear when he first spoke, and he is the one who gives us scriptural understanding of the truth of God's word.
With the above being said, how should one debate rabbi tovia singer? Make sure he does not reference the Talmuh, and being that he does not believe Yeshua is the Messiah, one needs to stop him from bringing up the Brit-Chadashah. Just stay on the Tanalk. Yeshua will be seen from the Tanakh, and God will bring them to the Brit-chadashah.
Michael Brown wants to debate him again and well as rabbi Eduardo and many others
@@ThePreacherman9 brown is known for attacking his opponents personally that’s why tovia isn’t interested in wasting time talking to him
more like Brown slaughtered Tovia so badly that Tovia refused to air the debate for a long time. Brown only engages in personal attacks against Tovia because time and time again the Rabbi has used scriptures deceptively to captivate a misunderstood audience. there are many times he rips a verse out of context or makes up his own translation and changes the meaning.@@Ancient-theology
To be fair, singer avoids debating messianic Jews.
Great job Dr Solberg! God bless you!
Someday everyone will know that Jesus and the Father are one.
Gospels were written much earlier and when Paul said according to Scripture, he referred to the gospels. We have internal evidences to prove Gospels especially Matthew and Mark were written earlier. So Paul could quote …according to the scripture
Singer is not willing to understand double prophecy. He can only see how the "plain meaning" of Isa 7:15-"before the boy knows enough to reject the wrong and choose the right, the land of the two kings you dread will be laid waste" - meaning that Isaiah believes the child he has just described (v. 14) will be born within his lifetime, as a harbinger of the destruction (by Assyria!) of kings Rezin of Aram and Pekah of Remaliah (7:1). The language of 8:3 echoes that of 7:14 as Isaiah goes in to the prophetess and she conceives and gives birth to a son. It is no longer controversial to observe that the ‘almah of 7:14 simply refers to a young woman of marriageable age, without settling the question of her virginity. Thus it seems most likely that the child of 7:14 is Isaiah's son, Maher-Shalal-Hash-Baz. Isaiah 8:4 reinforces this equation, with language carefully reminiscent of 7:15-"Before the boy knows how to say ‘My father' or ‘My mother,' the wealth of Damascus and the plunder of Samaria will be carried off by the king of Assyria." Only now Israel is explicitly included among Assyria's victims. However what Singer doesn't understand is that at the same time, 7:14 refers to the enigmatic child as Immanuel, "God with us," the name that recurs in 8:8 and 10. This name likewise links the child with Maher-Shalal-Hash-Baz but also points forward to a more distant time when the plans of Israel's enemies will be thwarted (8:9-10). This "bifocal vision" prepares the reader for 9:1-7, which is all about restoration after the punishment begun by Assyria. In this context appear the words musically immortalized by Handel, "For to us a child is born, to us a son is given" (9:6a). Against the current critical consensus it is difficult to identify this son, who is an heir to David's throne, "Mighty God," "Everlasting Father," "Prince of Peace," and governing eternally (9:6b-7), with anyone other than Israel's royal Messiah, and we ought not be surprised to learn that that is precisely how the post-Christian Jewish Targum understood it. While dating traditions in the Isaiah Targum proves notoriously difficult, it does seem unlikely that any Scripture would first be taken as messianic in any Jewish context aware of Christian claims for that text. We do not know why the translators of the LXX chose parthenos-a term that does imply sexual virginity-to render ‘almah, but it seems reasonable to assume that part of the reason was that they too recognized Immanuel was no ordinary child whose fulfillment was exhausted in the life of Maher-Shalal-Hash-Baz. Certainly no figures in between Isaiah's day and Jesus' birth even remotely qualify for this child who is a sign of divine presence; hence it seems appropriate to use the expression, "double fulfillment." Isaiah recognized that his son would be a sign and symbol (8:18), both of God's activity in his day and of the ultimate child who would comprehensively fulfill the Immanuel promises of chaps. 7-9.
It's this double prophecy we also see in Isaiah and despite it also talks of Israel as a nation the double prophecy in 53 brings us to the messiah, as if you study Isaiah 53 in its full context you must raise the question how all of the content can possibly apply to Israel or did Israel ever be righteous or die for the sins of Israel etc?
If you want to know how Jesus Christ connects to God read Colossians 1 from verse 15. Why do debaters not mention this Scripture.
Thank you for praying. I’m always a little taken aback when men of God don’t pray publicly prior. It just feels right.
Oh my goodness!!! Absolutely loved this. It was dripping with scripture and I’m with you RL, I learned a lot. If this debate was another 2 hours I would’ve listened. He definitely knows his scripture but he has to deny a lot to say the Old Testament doesn’t point to Christ as our savior. You did awesome!
Mormons also make the Jewish scriptures point to Joseph Smith. This doesn't prove Jesus as the Messiah, anymore than it proves Joseph Smith a prophet.
@@waitstill7091 your argument is self defeating. You are assuming that Jesus isn’t the messiah.
@@truediscussionmedia1481 Christians draw their conclusions about Jesus from their Christian scripures, like Mormons do from their scriptures.(BOM) Jews reject Jesus because they draw their conclusions from the Hebrew scriptures.
@@waitstill7091 so because the Jews reject Jesus as the Messiah, then the New Testament is false? By what standard do you know the Jews are correct?
@@truediscussionmedia1481 The Hebrew bible is clear about the role of the Messiah. 1)Jews reunification 2)The Temple rebuilt 3)World Peace, etc. The Christian scriptures make the claim Jesus was the Messiah without him having actually fulfilled the role.
Something I noted: Rabbi Singer never really answers any of the questions that Solberg asks. I was looking forward to his explanations as to why he disbelieves Jesus, the resurrection, and the NT writers and validity of the entire NT. I watched the entire video....Rabbi skillfully skirted those Jesus questions that Solberg kept asking him throughout the entire debate. And even at the very end...Solberg respectfully asks him to please address at least one Jesus-question in the Rabbi's closing argument. Crickets. (Sly fox.)
Pod. Solberg deserves more than just 20k subscribers..
Finaly.. a good debate with Tovia Singer
You had my heart at the opening prayer psalm 25 🙏🙌 i pray that all the time
I get Singers aversion to the resurrection as a starting point, but isn't the evidence for the resurrection similar to the flood which he affirms? And he seemed to dismiss the resurrection as democracy and yet would affirm Jewish tradition by the same.
Two brilliant biblical scholars, each make very convincing arguments. One is right, and one is wrong. They both believe with all their heart, yet one may go to hell for not believing, and the other may be condemned for idolatry. I see truth in both of their arguments. So what does a pilgrim like me believe?
It's not idolatry if you worship the one God. Jesus is the second person of the ONE God, echad.
Soldier of Christ 💪🏻
At the very end, Rabbi Singer says we have to start with the Hebrew Bible and then quotes Numbers 23:19 (2:02:00) My question is who wrestled with Jacob and changed his name to Israel?
28 Then He said, “Your name shall no longer be Jacob, but Israel; for you have striven with God and with men and have prevailed.”
I don't know why these debates even happen. There is just not enough time to saturate in explanation any one subject that arises in a debate like this. A discussion of such importance should be done in a radio show or podcast, with episodes numbering in the hundreds if not thousands.
CS Lewis also dealt with the legend. CS Lewis more or less said he had read about legends and said the gospels have never read as legend but as fact. He could tell the difference between 2 types of story. The other issue is even most secular scholars believe Jesus existed.
_Solbergs KO's_
43:53 When Rabbi Singer highlights 1 Corinthians 15:3-4 highlighting "in accordance with the Scriptures" it is important to note that Paul is talking about many Scriptures. In General, the claim is that there are many Scriptures/ the entire OT that testify of Jesus. In Specific, since it is unspokenly requested, here are Scriptures pertaining to 1 Corinthians 15:3-4: Psalm 16:10; Isaiah 53:10. The claim of Jesus is that if you truly knew the Scriptures, you'd recognize Him, and therefore know the Father they claim to worship. It's all about Jesus.
I’m not a Christian anymore but I really enjoyed your debate with Tovia. Both of you guys were well equipped and very educated on the subjects at hand, but in contrast to his previous debates you were quite formidable, so kudos to you on that.
Thank you, Mikhael. Blessings, Rob
Very interesting and respectful debate. Thank you both!
The reason the Messiah is Israel and can represent Israel is because He is the King of Israel! It's why monarchs can speak with the "royal we." Peter Gentry has a number of pertinent points in Isaiah that would help in this debate.
Israel is a man (Jacob). Israel is land. Israel is a people. Israel is a remnant. Israel is the Messiah. The word Israel is applied in so many unique ways, the fact any Jew would argue that the Messiah is not truly "Israel" is so bizarre.
Something odd in this debate:
how come it's the Christian starting to ask questions to the rabbi?
Why not the other way around?
Christianity offers the answers to the world.
Not Judaism.
Yet. Tova didn't applied any Tanakj explanation of the Messiah , and many Jews accept Christ more and more , including me
Funny I see opposite for the last 30 years
I have many Chrisitan friends who ask tons of questions just because I'm a Jew.
most ask why I don't believe in messiah.
So, I always reply with the same thing. The messiah is not a divine being and will not die.
Then I show them in scripture.
Deuteronomy 13:6-8
King James Version
6 If thy brother, the son of thy mother, or thy son, or thy daughter, or the wife of thy bosom, or thy friend, which is as thine own soul, entice thee secretly, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which thou hast not known, thou, nor thy fathers.
7 Namely, of the gods of the people which are round about you, nigh unto thee, or far off from thee, from the one end of the earth even unto the other end of the earth;
8 Thou shalt not consent unto him, nor hearken unto him; neither shall thine eye pity him, neither shalt thou spare, neither shalt thou conceal him:
I tell them as you can see here the warning not to follow other gods that your father did not know.
So when God reveled himself at Sinai jesus was not there.
he was very specific
Deuteronomy 4
12 And the Lrd spoke unto you out of the midst of the fire: you heard the voice of the words, but saw no image only heard a voice.
again, saw no image
16 Lest you corrupt yourselves, and make you a graven image, the image of any figure, the likeness of male or female
the likeness of anything
23 Take heed unto yourselves, lest you forget the covenant of the Lrd your Gd, which he made with you, and make you a graven image, or the likeness of anything, which the L_rd thy Gd hath forbidden you.
5 Unto thee it was shown, that thou mightest know that the Lrd he is Gd; there is none else beside him.
39 Know therefore this day, and consider it in thine heart, that the Lrd he is Gd in heaven above, and upon the earth beneath: there is none else
Hosea 13:4
4 Yet I am the Lord thy God from the land of Egypt, and thou shalt know no god but me: for there is no saviour beside me.
Joel 2:27
27 And ye shall know that I am in the midst of Israel, and that I am the Lord your God, and none else: and my people shall never be ashamed.
Isaiah 44:6
Thus said the LORD, the King of Israel,
Their Redeemer, the LORD of Hosts:
I am the first and I am the last,
And there is no God but Me.
Deuteronomy 4:35
35 Unto thee it was shewed, that thou mightest know that the Lord he is God; there is none else beside him.
Isaiah 48:12
12 Hearken unto me, O Jacob and Israel, my called; I am he; I am the first, I also am the last.
None else
one
Echad
they get and so do all the many people talked to becoming a Noachides
@@Pasture_Prime there is more than 144000 messianic Jews even wtihin Israel they tried to ban the Bible because many Jews converted , I can tell. My whole Family accepted Christ.. so I'm speaking about Facts and you?
דְמ֥וּ עַמִּ֖י מִבְּלִ֣י הַדָּ֑עַת כִּ֣י אַתָּ֞ה הַדַּ֣עַת מָאַ֗סְתָּ וְאֶמְאָֽסְךָ֙ (כתיב וְאֶמְאָֽסְאךָ֙) מִכַּהֵ֣ן לִ֔י וַתִּשְׁכַּח֙ תּוֹרַ֣ת אֱלֹהֶ֔יךָ אֶשְׁכַּ֥ח בָּנֶ֖יךָ גַּם־אָֽנִי:
@@Pasture_Prime don't speak google translate
@@TheBibleCode
אאֵ֣ת כָּל־הַדָּבָ֗ר אֲשֶׁ֤ר אָֽנֹכִי֙ מְצַוֶּ֣ה אֶתְכֶ֔ם אֹת֥וֹ תִשְׁמְר֖וּ לַֽעֲשׂ֑וֹת לֹֽא־תֹסֵ֣ף עָלָ֔יו וְלֹ֥א תִגְרַ֖ע מִמֶּֽנּוּ:
בכִּֽי־יָק֤וּם בְּקִרְבְּךָ֙ נָבִ֔יא א֖וֹ חֹלֵ֣ם חֲל֑וֹם וְנָתַ֥ן אֵלֶ֛יךָ א֖וֹת א֥וֹ מוֹפֵֽת:
גוּבָ֤א הָאוֹת֙ וְהַמּוֹפֵ֔ת אֲשֶׁר־דִּבֶּ֥ר אֵלֶ֖יךָ לֵאמֹ֑ר נֵֽלְכָ֞ה אַֽחֲרֵ֨י אֱלֹהִ֧ים אֲחֵרִ֛ים אֲשֶׁ֥ר לֹֽא־יְדַעְתָּ֖ם וְנָֽעָבְדֵֽם:
דלֹ֣א תִשְׁמַ֗ע אֶל־דִּבְרֵי֙ הַנָּבִ֣יא הַה֔וּא א֛וֹ אֶל־חוֹלֵ֥ם הַֽחֲל֖וֹם הַה֑וּא כִּ֣י מְנַסֶּ֞ה יְהֹוָ֤ה אֱלֹֽהֵיכֶם֙ אֶתְכֶ֔ם לָדַ֗עַת הֲיִשְׁכֶ֤ם אֹֽהֲבִים֙ אֶת־יְהֹוָ֣ה אֱלֹֽהֵיכֶ֔ם בְּכָל־לְבַבְכֶ֖ם וּבְכָל־נַפְשְׁכֶֽם:
האַֽחֲרֵ֨י יְהֹוָ֧ה אֱלֹֽהֵיכֶ֛ם תֵּלֵ֖כוּ וְאֹת֣וֹ תִירָ֑אוּ וְאֶת־מִצְוֹתָ֤יו תִּשְׁמֹ֨רוּ֙ וּבְקֹל֣וֹ תִשְׁמָ֔עוּ וְאֹת֥וֹ תַֽעֲבֹ֖דוּ וּב֥וֹ תִדְבָּקֽוּן:
ווְהַנָּבִ֣יא הַה֡וּא א֣וֹ חֹלֵם֩ הַֽחֲל֨וֹם הַה֜וּא יוּמָ֗ת כִּ֣י דִבֶּר־סָ֠רָ֠ה עַל־יְהֹוָ֨ה אֱלֹֽהֵיכֶ֜ם הַמּוֹצִ֥יא אֶתְכֶ֣ם | מֵאֶ֣רֶץ מִצְרַ֗יִם וְהַפֹּֽדְךָ֙ מִבֵּ֣ית עֲבָדִ֔ים לְהַדִּֽיחֲךָ֙ מִן־הַדֶּ֔רֶךְ אֲשֶׁ֧ר צִוְּךָ֛ יְהֹוָ֥ה אֱלֹהֶ֖יךָ לָלֶ֣כֶת בָּ֑הּ וּבִֽעַרְתָּ֥ הָרָ֖ע מִקִּרְבֶּֽךָ:
זכִּ֣י יְסִֽיתְךָ֡ אָחִ֣יךָ בֶן־אִ֠מֶּ֠ךָ אֽוֹ־בִנְךָ֨ אֽוֹ־בִתְּךָ֜ א֣וֹ | אֵ֣שֶׁת חֵיקֶ֗ךָ א֧וֹ רֵֽעֲךָ֛ אֲשֶׁ֥ר כְּנַפְשְׁךָ֖ בַּסֵּ֣תֶר לֵאמֹ֑ר נֵֽלְכָ֗ה וְנַֽעַבְדָה֙ אֱלֹהִ֣ים אֲחֵרִ֔ים אֲשֶׁר֙ לֹ֣א יָדַ֔עְתָּ אַתָּ֖ה וַֽאֲבֹתֶֽיךָ:
חמֵֽאֱלֹהֵ֣י הָֽעַמִּ֗ים אֲשֶׁר֙ סְבִיבֹ֣תֵיכֶ֔ם הַקְּרֹבִ֣ים אֵלֶ֔יךָ א֖וֹ הָֽרְחֹקִ֣ים מִמֶּ֑ךָּ מִקְצֵ֥ה הָאָ֖רֶץ וְעַד־קְצֵ֥ה הָאָֽרֶץ:
טלֹֽא־תֹאבֶ֣ה ל֔וֹ וְלֹ֥א תִשְׁמַ֖ע אֵלָ֑יו וְלֹֽא־תָח֤וֹס עֵֽינְךָ֙ עָלָ֔יו וְלֹֽא־תַחְמֹ֥ל וְלֹֽא־תְכַסֶּ֖ה עָלָֽיו:
יכִּ֤י הָרֹג֙ תַּֽהַרְגֶ֔נּוּ יָֽדְךָ֛ תִּֽהְיֶה־בּ֥וֹ בָרִֽאשׁוֹנָ֖ה לַֽהֲמִית֑וֹ וְיַ֥ד כָּל־הָעָ֖ם בָּאַֽחֲרֹנָֽה:
יאוּסְקַלְתּ֥וֹ בָֽאֲבָנִ֖ים וָמֵ֑ת כִּי בִקֵּ֗שׁ לְהַדִּֽיחֲךָ֙ מֵעַל֙ יְהֹוָ֣ה אֱלֹהֶ֔יךָ הַמּוֹצִֽיאֲךָ֛ מֵאֶ֥רֶץ מִצְרַ֖יִם מִבֵּ֥ית עֲבָדִֽים:
יבוְכָ֨ל־יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל יִשְׁמְע֖וּ וְיִֽרָא֑וּן וְלֹֽא־יוֹסִ֣פוּ לַֽעֲשׂ֗וֹת כַּדָּבָ֥ר הָרָ֛ע הַזֶּ֖ה בְּקִרְבֶּֽךָ:
יגכִּֽי־תִשְׁמַ֞ע בְּאַחַ֣ת עָרֶ֗יךָ אֲשֶׁר֩ יְהֹוָ֨ה אֱלֹהֶ֜יךָ נֹתֵ֥ן לְךָ֛ לָשֶׁ֥בֶת שָׁ֖ם לֵאמֹֽר:
ידיָֽצְא֞וּ אֲנָשִׁ֤ים בְּנֵֽי־בְלִיַּ֨עַל֙ מִקִּרְבֶּ֔ךָ וַיַּדִּ֛יחוּ אֶת־יֽשְׁבֵ֥י עִירָ֖ם לֵאמֹ֑ר נֵֽלְכָ֗ה וְנַֽעַבְדָ֛ה אֱלֹהִ֥ים אֲחֵרִ֖ים אֲשֶׁ֥ר לֹֽא־יְדַעְתֶּֽם:
טווְדָֽרַשְׁתָּ֧ וְחָֽקַרְתָּ֛ וְשָֽׁאַלְתָּ֖ הֵיטֵ֑ב וְהִנֵּ֤ה אֱמֶת֙ נָכ֣וֹן הַדָּבָ֔ר נֶֽעֶשְׂתָ֛ה הַתּוֹעֵבָ֥ה הַזֹּ֖את בְּקִרְבֶּֽךָ:
טזהַכֵּ֣ה תַכֶּ֗ה אֶת־יֽשְׁבֵ֛י הָעִ֥יר הַהִ֖וא לְפִי־חָ֑רֶב הַֽחֲרֵ֨ם אֹתָ֧הּ וְאֶת־כָּל־אֲשֶׁר־בָּ֛הּ וְאֶת־בְּהֶמְתָּ֖הּ לְפִי־חָֽרֶב:
יזוְאֶת־כָּל־שְׁלָלָ֗הּ תִּקְבֹּץ֘ אֶל־תּ֣וֹךְ רְחֹבָהּ֒ וְשָֽׂרַפְתָּ֣ בָאֵ֗שׁ אֶת־הָעִ֤יר וְאֶת־כָּל־שְׁלָלָהּ֙ כָּלִ֔יל לַֽיהֹוָ֖ה אֱלֹהֶ֑יךָ וְהָֽיְתָה֙ תֵּ֣ל עוֹלָ֔ם לֹ֥א תִבָּנֶ֖ה עֽוֹד:
יחוְלֹֽא־יִדְבַּ֧ק בְּיָֽדְךָ֛ מְא֖וּמָה מִן־הַחֵ֑רֶם לְמַ֩עַן֩ יָשׁ֨וּב יְהֹוָ֜ה מֵֽחֲר֣וֹן אַפּ֗וֹ וְנָֽתַן־לְךָ֤ רַֽחֲמִים֙ וְרִֽחַמְךָ֣ וְהִרְבֶּ֔ךָ כַּֽאֲשֶׁ֥ר נִשְׁבַּ֖ע לַֽאֲבֹתֶֽיךָ:
יטכִּ֣י תִשְׁמַ֗ע בְּקוֹל֙ יְהֹוָ֣ה אֱלֹהֶ֔יךָ לִשְׁמֹר֙ אֶת־כָּל־מִצְוֹתָ֔יו אֲשֶׁ֛ר אָֽנֹכִ֥י מְצַוְּךָ֖ הַיּ֑וֹם לַֽעֲשׂוֹת֙ הַיָּשָׁ֔ר בְּעֵינֵ֖י יְהֹוָ֥ה אֱלֹהֶֽיךָ:
I love listening to Rabbi Singer but i think Prof Solberg put forward some great arguments and i think he was more convincing in this debate.
he also said the dead will rise when the messiah comes, and he quotes Is 26 as proof. what is ironic, is that is exactly what the new testament says will happen when Jesus returns!
*1 THESSALONIANS 4:15-17*
But they didnt.. nobody did .
R.Tovia showing you that is one condition. And it didnt happend
I watched this debate on Tovia's channel. I think you did speak very well, and he never answered the questions, but speaking Jew to tell us that if we don't speak Jew we are not God’s people and can't understand the scriptures.
He's making the same mistake his ancestors did by denying Jesus as The Messiah.
Question to the Jews: If you don't believe in Jesus being The Son of Man, who was The Son Of Man King Nebuchadnezzar saw in Daniel 3:24-24.
I love what Paul said in
Romans 10:1-5 🙏🏾
Hello!
First Rabbi Tovia dosent need to answer your Question when you rellay on the new testament, wich for jews dosent worth nothing .
But You can ask on the Old testament..
Christians really on the jews but the jews dont need to rellay on chrsitian as far they need to "proof" something .
The Tora stand for its self.
If you take out what is said in Tora you stay with nothing in your gospel.
-Man was created In the image of god and not god was created in the image of man (like Christians do)
I will check on daniel on return to you my answer.
❤
A right you probbley belive its jesus because its said the son of god ..
Its have to be jesus how can it be other then him ?
Well its an angel=son of god.
But you dont hebrew so you translate it worng
How I wish Rabbi Singer ultimately know that Jeshua is really the Messiah in the Old Testament Bible. Wishing God will open his spiritual eyes. God bless Rabbi Singer.
He pray the same for you
If Christianity really were reading the original Hebrew text, they will really see how much idolatry they are in. May Aba YAHUWAH guide and protect you during this era Rabbi TobYah.
אמן
Keep it up, brother, I've watched a few minutes and I can tell you that debating is not the easiest task out there but I see you prepared well and put forth some good arguments so far, I have to watch the whole thing still. I think as a whole we as followers of the Jewish Messiah, have a task to prepare ourselves diligently so that we can understand how the blessed people of Israel thinks, and to be able to understand their counter arguments and be able to put forth a Biblical answer for the faith that we profess and believe is theirs also in Messiah Yeshua, may the Lord of Hosts bless them and may He let His face shine upon them. God bless!
People struggling in darkness will go toward a light if there is one available. If you have one, prop it up
@@tbishop4961 He is the light of the world so may we make His name known 🙏
Yes its not easy with orthodox but Jesus is the saviour zech 9 9 Ephesians 2 8 For By grace are ye saved through faith and that not of yourselves it is the gift of Gd not of works lest any should boast.
@@tbishop4961 Trash. You’ve resorted to deleting comments when challenged. You should keep quiet.
@@Christo-pv7eb I can't delete your comments dude🤦♂️. You're way too angry to be trolling youtube comments
We shall seek the Lord with our heart and Hewill reveal himself to us. The Lord says the human knowledge is foolishness to God.❤
Great debate, truth always prevails … Jesus is lord ..
He really didn't address the Two Powers in Heaven issue did he? IMHO the burden is on him to show relationship between modern Judaism and ancient Judaism.
Hey, Jim. Yeah, I was a little disappointed! I wanted to hear Rabbi Singer's position on that issue. But he side-stepped and, instead, challenged whether Alan Segal (the Jewish scholar I had cited) was a "real" Jew.
Rob
@Finn Lapp But surely it is recognized that Judaism is not practiced by anyone today as it was in the first century when the temple and priesthood existed?
He was on the ropes in the first part of the open dialog but… he talked around.
Who?
@@wakehimup4eva778 rabbi was on the ropes but kinda changed the direction. RL hit him with a few zingers.
At 33 minutes mr singer is talking about how everyone will follow the future/real messiah. As a Christian I believe Jesus is the real messiah but I understand some peoples don’t or won’t accept him as messiah. So when the future messiah comes according to Mr singer will not all Christian deny him because we believe messiah has already come. I’m just trying to understand his argument. Which ever way you look at it, from his understanding there’s no way all people will accept either Jesus or future messiah. Just me thinking out loud 🙏❤️
Hello elia.
(Im a jew)
I think when the jewish messiah will come it will be such inormens ivvent that no one can denay it. Also for the ethieist people.
Dont worry . If think on of the reasons christianty came to the world, although its uncorrect , is to make humanity prepared for such huge evvent and the idea of Mashich
You know when you see it . Hopefully bin our time.
@@yosefelianimusicchannel1070 according to Jewish understanding, the messiah had to come prior to the destruction of the second temple. How do reconcile that.
Wow, amazing debate. Rabbi Singer makes me want to learn hebrew.
A professor trying to tell a Rabbi he doesn’t understand his Tanakh is mind blowing. You can tell the Rabbi is so passionate speaking about the book his ancestors preserved through thousands of years. Meanwhile the professor is trying to fit a Catholic book into the Hebrew Scriptures
the objection he used against the new testament can be used against him. he said all the things you believe to be true, is because the new testament told you. and that is a circular reasoning. well, that same argument can be used against him.
because, everything he believes to be true is found from the torah. its the torah which told him God came down in a cloud and fire at mount Sinai. and that is the basis (the Sinai event) for Judaism. but the only source which tells us that this happened is the torah. which means he just fell in the circular reasoning he attacked the new testament by
which means he is being dishonest.
second, if he throws away the new testament whole sale as legend, then he would be forced to answer these five questions:-
1) how did Christianity start?
2) who started it?
2) where did it start?
3) how did it rapidly spread?
4) why were the Jews extremely hostile to it FROM THE VERY BEGINNING?
because, there is a real religion called Christianity, its 2000 years old and it was extremely opposed by the rabbis from the very beginning. the only way you can explain these facts, is if the the new testament is historical. if the new testament was complete fiction, then you wouldn't be able to explain the reality of Christianity.
@Dustin Neely but they are still rabbinic sources. which means he is still in the "circular reasoning" he accused the new testament of
@@thatethiopiandude5077 I hear this from atheists all the time. the answer is simple that it amazes me how you miss it. you think RTS is dismissing the empirical proof for the NT which you are then using against the OT. in reality, he is saying that since we all agree that the OT is true, in order to prove the NT changes to judaism you need to provide the jews empirical evidence, which you cannot do by citing a book. your responses to the OT, that's its also only true because of the book and the belief in the father to son oral tradition is only an argument for someone who doesnt want to rely on the book and the father to son tradition - people such as atheists etc. jews and christians both trust the book and the oral tradition.
that's why the professor's argument fails - he said that the resurrection is what saves the OT from biblical criticism. his attempt at using modern biblical criticism fails because it is not the resurrection that supports the OT - it is the jewish tradition. he apparently doesnt understand judaism. I want to know how he thinks all the jews including j followers believed in the torah prior to the resurrection? were they all just not smart and dont know epistomology?
The religion isn’t complete fiction, obviously it started at some point and was opposed by the Jews. How does that prove that the NT facts are historical?!
@Dustin Neely the Christian problem is that they also accept the Jewish tradition that they received the Torah at Sinai. (At least I think they do, I don’t know much about catholics). Therefore, the book can’t be used as proof, and neither can any Christian traditions, since they were opposed as false traditions by the Jews at the beginning. So while a Catholic can use his traditions to belief in his faith, he has no weapon in his quiver of which to use to converting Jews, and interestingly, the modern day Catholic Church isn’t busy converting jews (as far as I know).
Furthermore, it’s not just a disagreement about the veracity of the Christian tradition that prevents jews from following it. Jews will maintain the Christian traditions to be a theological impossibility due to its contradictions of the written Torah. So while you are right that the sola scriptura people have a problem in the face of Judaism because of their lack of traditions, catholics have the second problem.
Lastly, if you can inform me, the Jewish tradition is based on a national revelation which continued to have national revelations. Do catholics have a national revelation tradition?
@@proudpharisee5303 if he doesn't completely deny the empirical proof for the NT, he then has to deal with the evidence for the resurrection. but because he cannot, the way he deals with the evidence for the resurrection is by completely dismissing the new testament since you agreed that cannot be done, you are stuck with the proof for the resurrection
We gentiles loves the Jews because of YESHUA period
You did well, good debate!
I don't think so
Why?
@@V_George😂😂😂😂😂😂
Looks like Solberg was trying to flatter Tovia to death.
Not exactly a winning strategy.
@5:20 Mr. Solberg, I won't hold you being a Gentile against you, but I will hold it against you if you think Mr. Singer is not a Gentile. The "Jewish" are not Jews, as explained below. They are mere "Jewish" Gentiles because they have no patrilineal registry. (See Ezra 2:62)
@hesedkenrecovery
Exodus 2:24
- Ruhama Avraham, Avishai Abrahami, Roman Abramovich, Henry Abramson, Dan Abrams
- Rabbi Amnon Yitzhak, Dalia Itzik, Shahar Isaac, Jason Isaacs, Barak Yitzhaki, Rabbi Shimon Isaacson, Yoav Yizchak
- Rabbi YY Jacobson, Gad Yaacobi, Simcha Jacobovici, Rabbi Binyomin Jacobs, Omer Benjakob
1 Chronicles 2:1-2
- Rami Levy, Steve Cohen, Gershon HaCohen, Ellie Cohanim, Yariv Levin, Adam Levine, Chaim Levinson, Batya Levinthal, Tsahi HaLevi, Steven Levitan
- Gal Gadot, Yosef Ba Gad, Josh Gad
- Rabbi Yaron Reuven, Milton Rubenfeld, David Rubenstein, Simon Reuben, David Reuben, Kevin Rubin
- Danny Danon, Yohanan Danino, Yaakov Zada Daniel, Yuval Dayan
- Haim Ben-Asher, Ya’akov Asher
- Hananya Naftali, Ori Naftaly
- Joe Zevuloni, Itay Zvulun
- Rabbi Shlomo Yehuda, Monte Judah, Eliezer Ben Yehuda
- Yafit Josephson, Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, Tomer Yosefi, Oded Menashe, Molly Ephraim, Ari Ben Menashe, Mark Ifraimov, Allison Josephs
- Avi Issacharoff, Naama Issachar
- Paul Simon, Daniel Ben-Simon, Itamar Shimoni, Ran Ben Shimon, Kobi Shimony, Rabbi Moshe Shimonov
- Yoav Benjamini, Ben Binyamin, Yuhan Benjamin
Regions
- Guni Israeli, Benjamin Disraeli
- Raphael Jerusalemy, David Yerushalmi
- Naor Zion, Shloime Zionce (2 Samuel 5:7)
- May Golan (1 Chronicles 6:71)
- Yitzhak Shamir (Judges 10:1)
- Ariel Sharon (1 Chronicles 27:29)
- Omer Adam (Joshua 3:16)
- Ofri Arad (Judges 1:16)
- Izhar Ashdot (1 Samuel 5:1)
- Maya Maron, Hanna Meron (Nehemiah 3:7)
- Nathan Goshen (Genesis 46:28)
- Moshe Sinai (Exodus 19:1)
- Shai Efrati (Genesis 35:16)
- Noam Arnon (Numbers 21:24)
- Rami Jaffee, Rabbi Dov Yaffe (Jonah 1:3)
- Yosef Shiloach (Isaiah 8:6)
- Mati Shoshani, Rabbi Duvi Bensoussan (Esther 1:2)
- Noa Tishby (1 Kings 17:1)
- Mordechai Kedar (Psalm 120:5)
- Dudi Sela (Judges 1:36)
- Aviv Alush (Numbers 33:13-14)
- Yoni Eilat (2 Chronicles 26:2)
- Gur Megiddo (Judges 5:19)
It is worth to notice that it’s hard to convince a Jew that Jesus is the messiah without evidence outside the Tanakh and Prof. Solberg does a very good job at giving evidence within and outside Tanakh. But if ones reject evidence outside Tanakh, then it is indeed hard to convince them that Jesus is the messiah.
However it doesn’t mean we must strictly reject all evidence outside Tanakh! God give us mind to discern and we indeed can discern things is true or not even if its not written in the Tanakh. That’s what’s scholarship is all about and I can see why Prof. Solberg plea for us to look it from scholarship points of view, because scholarship doesn’t have to disagree with Tanakh, but Rabi Tovia acted as if scholarship is always against Tanakh.
Let’s pray so that God lead us all to his truth, both from His living words of scripture and also from out ability to discern. Peace for yall!
For Prof. Solberg: maybe you can maneuver your argument so someone can agree that scholarship doesn’t have to disagree with Tanakh? I think if there is a group of people who can make this maneuver, you are definitely one of them. Because I agree with Rabi Tovia that faith is not democracy and about headcount, on which christians and their magnitude really doesn’t appeal even for me, but credibility of scholarship is not the same with democracy on number (in my view) but Rabi Tovia clearly don’t think the same. How can we convice him, then? I have no idea…. I am looking up on you!
Thats the problem. Some see evidence of Jesus in the OT and some dont. Some see reincarnation in the bible and some dont. Knowing their is a case for Jesus. The best was to determine if he is the messiah is to simply put the book down and listen to what the world declares. No higher name than Jesus and no other name has been spoken of more by atheists buddhists hindus etc in regards to having visions in NDEs or OBEs of going into the light.
Truth is found in the spiritual revelations always.
@@Yes-fe8ni Listening yo the world is a horrible way. God even warns of this. Be not like the nations around you, and talks about all the abominations they commit. Calling on the name of the LORD comes from Joel 2: 32 And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the LORD shall be delivered: The name is Gods name (Tetragrammaton) not Jesus. You can’t take that out and replace it with Jesus.
Isaiah 45:23 again the LORD(Tetragrammaton) speaking That unto me every knee shall bow, every tongue shall swear.
The New Testament again takes Gods name out and replaces it with Jesus. You can’t do this.
@@Christo-pv7eb i agree with you we shouldn’t follow the way of the world but it doesn’t mean we completely close our ear to listen for what people has to say.
we first listen and then discern, then check it in light of teaching of Tanakh…
now, most scholar agree that embarrassment of Jesus witnesses being woman is a evidence that these story is not just fabricated, but Rabi Tovia dodged it with story of Jezebel by implying that woman can become a witness to sth wrong, which is completely different case because Jezebel literally is the queen and we all know the only person more powerful than the King is The Queen (which is one of implicit message of the story)
and the case with jesus witness is they are lowly woman, relative of and associated to an executed criminal, on which making a witness is not giving them any gain at all… this is the basis of resurrection of Jesus and we must have an open mind thinking that they are at least sincere
then we check their sincerity and their story in light of Tanakh to see whether this is the truth or not.
Now, I’m not saying that I agree with all current christology, but if we just open our heart a little with a discerning mind, the possibility of Jesus being the promised messiah is not far fetched fabricated story as most Rabi will frame it…
@@rioanantakeliat5170 Why do Christian’s always do this “open mind” crap? Do you honestly think the rabbi hasn’t checked into these claims? He knows the whole Bible better than you or me. Do you know I spent years on this topic? Do you think that whole time I was just being stubborn and foolish?
Listen if there was a prophecy saying someone will die for your sins and the only way God will forgive you is if you believe in the death and resurrection then we’d believe it.
But the messiah is supposed to bring peace and worldwide knowledge of God. He’s supposed to fear God, not be worshipped as God.
@@Christo-pv7eb Because without the open mindedness, all debate will back to square one. What christian really want is for the Jews to cross check the fact themselves. Even if at the end you still reject Jesus after you cross check your fact, we are happy to see that! However, what most rabbi does is tell their follower to not even touch the new testament, don't read it, etc. If you spent your due diligence to research and check your faith, good for you and God will indeed give you your reward! Problem is people are often not even allowed to think, which is in itself is problematic at least for me. Again, my Jewish brother, I would be much more happy to hear you reject Jesus after you done your research, than just blindly following rabbi told you don't read this don't read that. That's the answer to your question why Christian beg for Jewish people open mindedness, because truth to be told, what is the only book is not accessible in the land of Israel? And why is that? Is it because all people agree upon it, or its just because the rabbi told them so?
You can see Rabi Tovia always dodge the thing if we going toward this direction and framing this kind of open-mindedness is dangerous. Well, it is dangerous I agree with that, especially from rabbinical perspective, and if it is indeed wrong, many people at risk to be lead astray. However, I think it is a fair price to pay if you want to get to the truth, and the Rabbi not letting people check by themselves (by dodging all these things) is something I don't agree with. Just give them the cautions, but do not do it in a misleading way!
There is no other documents on the face of the earth that the Rabbis really treat with hostility like the new testament... This fact on itself is something that we really need to examine, why is that? Isn't that intriguing?
On the basis for the resurrection of Jesus, Acts 2:27 was a midrash of Psalm 16:10.
Good job, Ron! I thought you did well in this debate, I just wish you addressed the fact that all nations do not know that Jesus is the Christ, and not just the most popular religion.
The fact that not all nations know Jesus is a proof that he is not the messiah because when the messiah comes everyone on earth will know the one true God and no one will have to teach anyone about him because they will know. So all evangelism, Bible schools, different religions, atheism is a proof that Jesus wasn’t the messiah
@@isaaclosh8082 they will know when He returns a second time.
@@mikeprew ironically that's exactly why Jews don't believe Jesus is the Messiah (among other reasons). In the Old Testament, the Messianic Prophecies and requirements to be the Messiah state that the person must bring world peace and all will know him. Nothing about a Second Coming (that's only in the New Testament). The Jewish Messiah is supposed to bring world peace and world knowledge of him in his first time arrival (not a second or third or fourth etc time. The FIRST TIME) according to Judaism and the OT. The NT admits that Jesus failed to do this and needs to use the excuse of a "second time". Jesus failed to bring world peace and global knowledge of him the first time, and so now there is the excuse that "he'll get it right the second time". Whether or not Jesus will come back or he will get it right the second time is irrelevant, because by failing to do so the FIRST TIME, he has already failed the Messianic Prophecies of the OT and Judaism.
@@YokaiX you can interpret His second coming as an excuse or whatever, but I really do disagree with that notion. The Hebrew Bible does seem to display seemingly contradicting depictions of the anointed One. Micah 5 says that He will be born in Bethlehem while Daniel 7 seemingly indicates the Christ as divine. Isaiah 9 says He will be reign forever while Daniel 9 says He will be cut off. You probably think Isaiah 53 speaks of Israel, but it speaks of a suffering servant who will bear the sins of people and be killed. All of these seemingly contradictory statements made in the TaNaKh can be understand when putting it into a Christian context. It is true that the entire world does not recognize Jesus as the anointed one, but I don't think it's ad hoc or moving the goalposts to say that this will happen at His second coming- I find it reasonable and not a strong enough reason to reject Yeshua as the mashiach.
@@isaaclosh8082 Actually he is the most know person in the world. People love him or hate him. Who else has met the many prophecies of scripture.
I see he blames Christian countries for the holocaust, maybe he could acknowledge that Hitler was not Christian and 2 Christian countries liberated many of the camps.
Yes. Before the holocaust there were pogroms in Europe against the Jews, by Christians. Jesus loving Christians. Also the Catholic Church permitted the holocaust.
@@truthwins8147 You are confusing the roman catholic church with the christian church
@@decay-154 Both the Uk and US are Protestant. The Christian church comes from many denominations to make the one body.
[part 2 contniuation...]
so, once we have established the suffering servant to be the messiah, lets ask some questions
1) is there any place in the entire hebrew bible where the whole nation of Israel or its righteous remnant are portrayed as a shoot and/or a root which sprouts forth (atsmakh)?
2) is there any incident where the suffering of the whole nation of Israel or its righteous remnant resulted in healing for the gentile nations? (because that is what the suffering of the servant does Is 53:5)
3) is there any moment where Israel became a sin offering for the nations? or was it itself in need of a cure for its sin?
Once this is out of the way, lets examine his claim of falsifiability. the rabbi claims, all of the things done by Christ are unfalsifiable. so therefore they cannot be used as evidence to establish his messiahship. but this is wrong in light of Is 53. lets examine that passage:-
"He was assigned a grave with the wicked, and with the rich in his death, though he had done no violence, nor was any deceit in his mouth." (Is 53:9)
here it clearly says the suffering servant (The Messiah) will die and be buried in a grave (the hebrew qavar) this is a clear prophecy about the messiah dying. we know why he is going to die. as an atonement for the sins of Israel and the world. that is explicitly stated in Is 53:5-8. in fact, he is said to be an offering for sin (asham) in v.10. an offering for sin is a sacrifice done for the purpose of the forgiving of sin (Lev 5:7 for instance) so the messiah will die, so that our sins will be atoned for.
But, after he dies, it says he shall see the light of life and be satisfied
"After the suffering of his soul, he will see the light [of life] and be satisfied; by his knowledge my righteous servant will justify many, and he will bear their iniquities." Is 53:11
(even though the dead sea scrolls and the Septuagint have the phrase "the light of life" the masoretic doesn't)
*HOW CAN HE SEE THE LIGHT IF LIFE AND BE SATISFIED, AFTER HE HAD DIED? AFTER HE HAD BEEN BURIED?*
The only way he can see the light of life again and be satisfied after he died, is if he came back to life. is if he was resurrected. that is the only way he can see the light of life after he had been dead and buried. so that is the criteria to identify the true messiah
*ANY MESSIAH CLAIMANT WHO CLAIMS TO DIE FOR THE SINS OF THE WORLD, AND THEN COMES BACK TO LIFE AFTER HIS DEATH AND BURIAL, IS THE TRUE MESSIAH*
a resurrection is not something that can be faked. either he rose from the dead or not. and according to the chronology given by the prophet, the messiah must suffer and die first, then raise from the dead. any person who didn't rise from the dead is not the messiah. so singer's polemic false flat to the ground. we know Jesus will fulfill the rest of the messianic prophecies, because he fulfilled the most important one. he died for the sins of the world, and then he rose from the dead. as the prophet said he would. the proof for it all is the resurrection
we can even go further, in Is 53:3-4 the suffering servant is considered as someone smitten of God by his own people. we know the speakers are the jewish people, because in v.8 the speaker who is the prophet, says he was stricken for the transgressions of *MY PEOPLE* that is what the speakers said in v.5. they said he (the servant) was wounded for our transgression. proving the speakers are the people of the prophet. meaning the jewish people
the jewish people thought this servant was smitten and cursed by God. but in reality he was the arm of God, the servant of God who had died for their sin. meaning, who ever the true messiah is, he must initially be rejected by the jewish people. the jewish people must consider him as someone cursed and smitten by God. any messiah claimant, who wasn't rejected and considered as smitten by God by the Jewish people is not the true messiah. the true messiah, must be considered by the jewish people as cursed and smitten by God
finally, in Is 53:1-2 the suffering servant is called the arm of The Lord. this means he has an ontological oneness with God. just as an arm and the rest of the body are of one flesh, God and the messiah are of one deity. that is why he is equated and depicted as a body part of God. which means he is God, he is divine. that is why he is called Jehovah/YHVH our righteousness (Jer 23:5-6) The God/Elohim who has an eternal throne (Psal 45:6) the mighty God (Is 9:6-7) the one who comings-forth is from eternity (Mic 5:2) the Lord in heaven (Psal 110:1)
so whoever the the true messiah is, he must be someone who claimed to be God in the flesh (because the messiah is human too, a physical descendant of David and Abraham) any messiah claimant, who doesn't claim to be God in the flesh is not the true messiah
*CONCLUSION*
1) THE MESSIAH MUST DIE FOR THE ATONEMENT OF OUR SIN
2) HE MUST COME BACK TO LIFE AFTER HIS DEATH AND BURIAL
3) HE MUST BE REJECTED BY HIS PEOPLE FIRST
4) HE MUST CLAIM TO BE GOD IN THE FLESH
*who does that sound like......?*
tovia singer refuted
What is the Rabbi talking about? 🤔 Zachariah 9 goes all the way up to 9:17 we definitely have Zachariah 9:10
I've seen him pop up on social media thru the years and I watched several until I felt physically ill from the multitude of his blatent and horrendous lies about Christians, deceitfulness, psychological manipulation, arrogance, and gaslighting his followers. It's wretched.
He says in this debate, he used to hate Christians... Well I hope that's true, obviously, but I doubt the "used to" part.
He goes on saying we don't believe certain books and implies authors are lying... He lumps all Christians into his hateful slander that might be true for certain people claiming to be Christian but they don't testify for me and I'm offended by his continual lies and mockery.
Some of his group setting were the worst I saw. Lying about us, tons of false claims about what we believe and false claims saying we don't use certain texts or we change our texts, all kinds of blasphemy, and laughing at us, mocking Jesus, making strawman arguments and laughing... Everything's so funny to him.
I pray God gets him serious with open eyes, ears and heart of flesh not stone. That he repent and turn from his wicked ways and see truth. In Jesus name amen and amen
Rabbi singer alway turned blind eyes on his sources just because he want to repudiate Christianity. Thank you for pointing out his double standards
Really nice to see this God Bless 🕊🤍💛
You did a great job solberg. I can tell Singer just absolutely loves the spotlight, so much so that he often comes off like a used car salesman lol. Solberg came off consistently sincere and witty, I hope you battle again soon.
Thanks, B String! ~Rob
Are you serious with your assessment? Rabbi Singer absolutely schooled this professor, so much so that the professor needed cards to read from. This wasn't really a debate to begin with - this was more along the lines of a student vs teacher.......🤣
@Paul Sandberg you just conceded that nowhere is the coming king ever called "messiah" in the bible. So why do you ask me to show you the word messiah in passages i claim are messianic?????
since all messianic prophecies do not have the name messiah, why do you expect the passages i quote as messianic to have the name messiah????
Nice points by professor solberg , after long time I saw Rabbi was caught in challenge of two powers theology of second temple period
This is something that has once been accepted but later became a heresy .
@@nashashbel6922 Yeah. It conveniently became a heresy 2 centuries after the birth of Christianity. Lol!!
@@flyingcat7975 lool
There were Jews who were expecting that the Messiah is the incarnation of the Archangel Metatron who is called Sar Ha Panim , Son of man ( that Jesus usually refers himself to ) , the Logos ( a divine being) as per Philo of Alexandria , ...
There is even a Jewish Machzor for Rosh Hashanah that mentions " Yeshua Sar Ha Panim " ( which is already omitted in some Machzor , some say it is Yeshua ben Yotzadak but the kabbalist Yehudah Liebes affirms that it's "Yeshua ha notzri") based on the fact that earlier Jewish believers , had this idea that the Messiah is the Angel of the Lord mentioned multiple times in the Tanach.
The one who sits on the 2nd throne in heaven !
In a discussion between R' Akiva and R' Yose of Galilea ,based on Dan 7:9-10, R'Akiva said that the first throne is for Hashem and the second throne for the Messiah which R' Yose of Galilea opposed strongly , may be due to the fact that it has already started to become a heresy within Judaism .
@@nashashbel6922 Exactly!
David K. led an offshoot of the 7th Day Adventists. The plague in Waco, Tx even notes this fact. 🤔
You said that Yahshua agreed with Hillel on Lev.19:18 the the substance of the Torah is LOVE yet your whole ministry is against those who desire to walk out love in their every day life by walking as Messiah walked in the Torah.
Sound hypocritical.
“Become imitators of me, as I also am of Messiah.”
1 Corinthians 11:1
It's not complicated
Feed and clothe desperate strangers
Minister to the sick and incarcerated
@@tbishop4961
Complicated,no. hard to actually do, yes.
And if you do them that’s works salvation according to most.
That’s only half of it, the half towards showing love for mankind.
The other half of the equation is loving God and showing it in our actions.
Both loving God and loving mankind has been belittled to just believing and saying you do because if you actually walk out what you confess then you might be labeled as a hieratic for doing “works to be saved“ even though that’s not the case it doesn’t matter to those who don’t do what they confess.
@@ForgedinTruth the road is being widened by this type of thinking. I wondered if there was anyone out there that saw it this way. You will never reach the orthodox when you and your version of messiah goes against deut 13 and the law of God.
@@davelyn786
How do you see that it goes against Debarim 13
@@ForgedinTruth well if someone says you don’t have to keep the commandments that God told us to walk in then it goes against it. People who come against other people who follow the commands don’t want to walk in the way. Deuteronomy 13 says the prophet that leads you away from following Him should not only not be followed but they should be stoned. Not that I am advocating for anyone’s stoning :) I actually like rob solberg. I liken listening to his arguments.
Brother Solberg, I know you’re a very knowledge person, I’m following all your videos and stuff, because I love the way you talk, but you’re lacking a little bit of boldness amon your statements, I would like to hear in this debate you’re talking about Jesus Christ, the Lord, and savior, with all passion like the Juwish guy did about
Jahweh
The Rabbi thinks Isaiah was one single author who wrote it in one go?? Literally no scholar worth their salt thinks that. The dude also sounds like the Cowardly Lion so that cracks me up, the Jews are always so full of themselves. Their pride over their legalism is their very downfall and why they denied their own savior.
Rabbi Tovia Singer/Rand says to Jesus: 'You said that you saw what your ancestors saw. Tell me what did you see?'