EXPLOSIVE: Amber Told the Jury to Research This Case!
Vložit
- čas přidán 18. 06. 2022
- Amber spoke directly to the jury and TOLD THEM to research it online. THEN criticised them for being influenced by social media.
#DEPPVHEARD juror breaks silence and tells how the jury came to their verdict and why they didn't believe Amber.
More videos:
Interview Part 1 Reaction: • UK Barrister REACTION ...
Interview Part 2 Reaction: • UK Barrister REACTION ...
Interview Part 3 • UK Barrister REACTION ...
Watch my UK #johnnydepp trial analysis
Amber Heard INTERVIEW REACTION PART 1:
• UK Barrister REACTION ...
JUROR SPEAKS OUT: REACTION:
• JUROR TELLS ALL! Amber...
UK Trial ANalysis:
PART 1:
• UK Barrister Analysis:...
Part 2:
• Depp v Heard UK Judgme...
PART 3
• INCIDENT 9 - "THE STAI...
Petition:
www.change.org/JusticeForJohn...
#JohnnyDepp Playlist:
• Johnny Depp v Amber He...
Check out my exclusive content at www.blackbeltbarrister.com
Also me: czcams.com/users/blackbeltsecrets?...
My wife's cooking: czcams.com/users/easychinesecookin...
Address for PAID Formal Advice ONLY: clerks@ShenSmith.com
Disclaimer: Neither this nor any other video, may be taken as legal advice. I accept no liability whatever for any reliance placed upon it, as there is no contract between us and I am not instructed by you.
For formal advice, please contact clerks@ShenSmith.com.
💌 Become a channel member to access stripes and perks!
/ @blackbeltbarrister
MY CAMERA GEAR
🎥 Big Camera amzn.to/3yFFcFf
🎥 Small Camera amzn.to/2RB7ez9
🎙 RODE VIDEOMic Pro+ amzn.to/2QCJURi
Gobe ND Filter amzn.to/2R3eEuA
Neewer Ring Light amzn.to/3aOkLtT
Switch Pod amzn.to/3sZb8yA
JOBY Tripod amzn.to/3dXJYDT
External Media Drive amzn.to/3uxNDOQ MY CHAIR:
amzn.to/3mYpPBB
And if you like my house and decor:
MY CHAIR:
amzn.to/3mYpPBB
Lamp 1 - amzn.to/3ntbEnm
Lamp 2 - amzn.to/3dXfUZi 🎓 Brilliant contract law book:
amzn.to/2PHC2O1 🎓 Excellent book with an overview of criminal law:
amzn.to/3gTPEAV 🎓 Learn more about trespass and tort law:
amzn.to/32N6TLS
(Affiliate link)
LAW FAQS
• Common Law
CONSUMER LAW PLAYLIST:
• Consumer Law
TREE LAW PLAYLIST:
• Tree Law Miniseries
ROAD TRAFFIC LAW PLAYLIST:
• Road Traffic Law
FAMILY LAW PLAYLIST:
• Family Law
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER:
I'm a Barrister of England and Wales.
Videos for educational guidance only, Always seek advice before taking action. Videos on my channel are not legal advice and should not be taken as such. I accept no liability for any reliance placed upon the content of these videos or references, therein.
#blackbeltbarrister #lawyer #barrister
Description contains affiliate links; I will occasionally earn commissions from qualifying purchases or leads generated. Description may contain affiliate or sponsored links, for which we may receive commissions or payment.
Bravo! Great catch 👏🏻 Her own hubris & ego keeps tripping her up over and over
Thank you 🙏 - and yes - trip after trip... This shows the real value of televising trials - every minor detail can reveal more and more ...
Thank you for helping us discover Black Belt Barrister Andy...YOU ROCK! BTW...THANK YOU ANDY! You and your content has always been top notch and much appreciated! You deserve to be in the ‘internet hall of fame’ if there ever is one! You are the brain behind ‘Screen Rants’ & ‘ Honest Trailers’....they will never be able to take that away from you💯🏴☠️
@@BlackBeltBarrister we should always have these trials streamed. This case would have been twisted all around if we couldn't see it for ourselves...
Love following your channel. You taught me a new word today… hubris. Thanks, Andy!
liars always trip like this
And by saying "look me up online" to the jury she is explicitly telling them to break their oath
She said, " look me up".
@@BigBossTV7 yes, you're right she did. But the point remains the same
@@BigBossTV7 if you are going to get technical and try to correct someone then it would help if you get the quote right.
Exactly!
And her narcissistic tendencies make her believe that they would be driven by an all consuming desire to know more about and obey her, so they obviously would look her up.
Amber: "look us up online and see who is the abuser
Jury: "ok...we did and found you guilty"
Amber: "it's not a fair trial because they looked us up online"
Exactly
@@melaniedelaware7500 she probably thought they see the UK trial and find her innocent. It's so annoying that they lost and keep banging on about the UK trial. Bitch it's an American trial i don't care if they found you innocent in UK, China, Belgium or Nigeria they have different laws and parameters there, you can't take it to America and say the trial is invalid because Johnny had his shot in another country on a different case
She is insane...She could have slapped the judge live on TV and denied it forever...She is not right in the head.
Alternatively, the jury didn't, and Amber objects due to them not fully reviewing the evidence. In particular, the illegal evidence that wasn't introduced in court.
@Asshats Love Johnny Depp!! Johnny Depp Es Racista!! Womp womp
Yes, 100% AH & Elaine wanted the Jury to research online - they brought it up more than just this. They even brought in a so-called social media expert to analyze how AH was so mistreated, poor poor AH. They did quite a lot of talking about online. Then that backfired and they lost, so they used online as the scapegoat as to why they lost.
AH found a lawyer just like her. JD found lawyers just like him, so interesting.
She is so contradictive it's horrible. I don't understand how she is allowed to keep doing this when a jury has found her liable.
Thank you bc I have been thinking the same thing. This is exactly what she did to get to this point and yet she is still being asked to go on those news shows. They are helping her abuse that man still. I don't understand it. If Johnny lost and did that it would be a whole different turn out. I know Johnny has said he doesn't want her money but she needs help accountable so he needs to get that money and donate it to charity. I don't understand why she is allowed to do this
The Stream by the "The Behavioral Arts" yesterday pointed something interresting out.
She seems to have a need for pitty, but also wan'ts to be seen as this strong Women. A total internal contradiction that also is the cause of her external contradictions.
AH: "Look at me, I have been beaten" (Wants Pitty)
Other Person: "But there are now injuries"
AH: "Because I was smart and skilled enough to cover them up" (Strong Independend Women)
I feel sorry for Johnny, because he, an empathic introvert has become the victim of a Narcisisst without a personality of there own.
He fell in love with her, becuause she took on some of his personality traits.
She says, that she has evidence pointing back to the beginning of there relationship. Showing, that she never truly loved him and had always planed to deceive him somehow.
If your spouse is makeing secret recordings of you, run. Run as far as you can. That is neither trust nor love. All the recording is meant to do, is hurt you in the long run.
AH does not belong in a Prison, but an Asylum.
That’s exactly what she meant. And if the jury did look online and found the UK judgement apparently it didn’t have the effect they hoped for. The jury decided to make their own decision based on the evidence presented at trial. And Johnny Depp won.
I concur
Thank god he won 🙏
'liar liar panties on fire' No smoke without fire and you could see the smoke rising from AH and not in a good way. Wait until she gets taken to court for insisting (for the rest of her life) that JD beat her and got away with it. She just can't stop commiting defamation of JD.
Just like countless millions on social media aware of Depp having lost the UK case (many before this trial and so if anything already on Amber's side) who could see the obvious truth with the trial screened on TV. Just as well it was or people would be conned now by MSM supporting Amber into thinking the verdict was unfair.
That's why their strategy afterwards was saying over and over that the jury googled them.
She also makes another statement where she says "look me up" trying to prompt them to search into social media which they then said in the interviews after that it was a problem that social media was brought into the court and such, introduced by their own expert witnesses with hashtags, its bizarre.
Out of curiosity I went back and looked up what the line of questioning was. It started with the playing of the recording where Amber tells him to "tell the world" and then Camille says that basically they are in court today because Johnny did speak up and Amber says, "I know that he is suing me and has sued other people or corporations that have said that as well" then almost exactly 1 minute later Camille says, "and once he left you, you continued to abuse him publicly by calling him an abuser..." to which amber answers, "He is an abuser and you can look either of us up online and see who is being abused online." so not only does she say they can look it up online but also reminds the jury that Johnny has sued other people and corporations for the same thing within a minute
@Letters and Words and yet she did an interview to cry crocodile tears about how the jury WAS gaslighted... She's just amazing 😂
@@darrinsiberia If they had gone online, their job would have been much easier cos there are so many people doing the research and putting the truth out that they didnt have to deligate even a min. People are not assholes to blindly side with some abuser, they are much humane and they sided with JD cos they knew she was lying and a psycho.
@@pavanbk15589 Guessing you missed the parts where the judge said before breaks and after the days "Do not talk about the case to others, do not do any outside research".
a narcissist will always have someone they can accuse of ruining their life,it’s invariably the same person the narcissist is trying to destroy.
They will also convince their victim that all of the narcs bad behavior is due to the victim. They will take even innocuous behaviors and turn them into huge problems. AH painted JD’s drug problem as the cause for all of her violence. She knew he felt ashamed and guilty about being an addict, and she knew it was a sore spot she could exploit. So she kept telling him that all of their problems and all of her behaviors were reactions to his substance abuse, which is why he kept apologizing to her for the “monster” (which she made him feel like he was when he used).
By her lawyers bringing up “online”, they were tempting the jury to go research it! Even if the jury did go and research it, it didn’t figure into the jury’s decision. AH and her lawyers are treating everyone as brainless individuals. And I find it insulting! I hope your petition to reopen the UK judgement will work!!
I think the fact that there's even a petition started by this barrister is going to piss her off!! And there should be an examination of the UK trial for many reasons. So much evidence from JD was not allowed by the judge (father of an employee of the Sun)
They were hoping to catch someone out but didnt
She called them ‘randos ‘ as if really they should all have been her sycophants
I bet u the pr team had talked to google to locally affect amber heard searches in that city where they jury got the results she wanted them to see
AH wanted the jury to research the U.K. trial so as to influence them in her favour IMO, that’s the reason she mentioned it. But seems the jury were smarter that her because they probably understand that she was the defendant in the U.K. that’s why she was sitting in a US courtroom 👍
I remember watching this live and yelling at the screen "WTF ARE YOU DOING!?!"
I believe Amber did want the jury to look up everything online and ONLY because she lost now the claim is "the jury was influenced by social media".
I've been on a jury and you know what I just make sure that should anything come up I would close the tab, window, ad etc to make sure it wouldn't influence me. I also even asked a question because I walked in on my husband watching the news. I wasn't paying attention to what he was doing and it was about 2min before it clicked because I was in the kitchen 30fr away. I volunteered this information to the judge who asked me "Do you feel like you can still do your job as a jury or do you feel like you have been compromised." I answered truthfully that I felt I continue as juror.
I don't know about every jury but everyone on the jury I was on took this extremely seriously because it was a murder trial and we were being asked to determine whether or this man lived or died as I live in a death penalty state and in this case that option was on the table. When you are holding another person's life and future in your hands you don't take it lightly.
Yes, I know this was a civil trial but these jurors were faced with essentially clearing Johnny's name or wielding the coffin shut. The American legal system works(as best it can)only if ppl believe that jurors can be impartial and once that faith is gone all the legal system becomes is a charade before a person is sent to jail.
Amber is playing a dangerous game by trying to say that a jury cannot be impartial in high profile cases because of social media.
Wow! You are really good person. By reading your post I had a better perspective how important and serious is be a juror.
I been call to be in jury duty few weeks ago for a criminal case but I have to be honest to the judge during the selection process. Even I can read and write English my vocabulary is not that extense to be in a criminal case. I told him I was concern I hear or, read something and I missed understand what I read or hear and have a bad conclusion of what is going on during the trial.
I was discharge but I felt the seriousness of the situation.
Wow! I didn't notice that. You keep catching interesting parts of this case many others have missed
Her testimony should have been to the jury, who were daily admonished by the judge to NOT go online or do any outside research. Just one more instance of AH's total disregard and disdain for the legal system.
Noticed that it was the only time she wasn't staring down the jury during her answers.
@@mr.m8539 I thought that too
@@mr.m8539 not the only time. She completely forgot about the the jury in her outrage when Camille said ‘Mr Depp got you the part in Aquaman, didn’t he Ms. Heard.’
Even though this is 20/20 vision, it really illuminates just how underhanded their strategy was. This trial was fascinating to me because it illustrated perfectly the gaslighting technique that narcissistic personalities use. This usually goes down behind closed doors, in private relationships and it is profoundly isolating for the person being gaslit. It was beautiful to have it exposed and I really appreciate that you continue to expose and analyze it. Thank You!
Well said. The whole trial has been a public service, providing a crash course in how to recognise narcissists and their tactics. It's truly blown the lid on this problem, and exposed how these types gaslight and manipulate people.
The thing is, was the clever manipulation coming from her legal team or devised by her...was she just running the show?
I was fortunate in being able to watch, from beginning to end. I have also been a jury member in the past. I have also unfortunately been in court as a witness. The dirty underhanded tricks I saw in this televised trial by ah and her lawyers, (allegedly) and eve barlow don't get me started, even her new pr guy accosting the court photographer! There was so much going on I was gobsmacked. Thank goodness it's legally out there for anyone to watch. Thank goodness JD is now with people who are kind ie Jeff Beck. Thank goodness the world is waking up to the horrendous manipulation tactics used to protect ah's lie and her further perpetuation of lies to protect the first lie. Lots to say, gotta go and create some dinner though. 🌞
Well said
MSM have been gaslighting since the rising of Trumpism
Amber & her Lawyers brought the UK Trial up many, many times during this Trial!! Like when she said that Johnny had already dragged her into court over all this! And when Rottenborn said in his closing, that the jury needed to tell Johnny & send a message to him that this was his last chance at trying to sue Amber over the allegations he was a wife beater! Oh & of course Elaine asked Amber many questions about it in her direct examination of Amber! They were trying their best to get the jury to hear & understand that Johnny had sued Amber in the UK & lost! But he did not sue Amber he sued The Sun & Amber was their star witness! Her & her team were just pitiful all around! Lol
I somehow missed this particular day of testimony, but the other time that she urged the jury to look them up online was when they announced in court all the various SM #name's- #Amber Turd Etc, she again said everybody knows all these sites- #Justice for Johnny Etc. She was complaining to the jury at how lopsided and unfair all the social media was being and at that time, again invited them to look those sites up. I find it funny that she encouraged this ( now obviously several times) in court, and when it apparently did not work because the Judgment went against her, then tries to say that the jury was swayed by social media. Thanks for your professional, unbiased, inspection of the facts.
Amber: You should look online to help your opinion
Also Amber: It's not fair, the jury were clearly viewing social media to form their opinion
No it was only unfair because they didn’t side with her. It would’ve been completely fair had it gone her way.
The fact she lied about donating her divorce money, and that she won in UK when it wasn't hers to win makes her dishonest, manipulative and uncredible. All why she lost.
Then goes on tv and says she shouldn’t have to be forced to donate that money to be believed. She is an idiot of a massive scale!!
Exactly 👍
Pledging
@@cyankirkpatrick5194 promise.... And receive 2 very different actions.
Wow, what a brilliant articulation of a pivotal point that no one else caught!
Thank you for your laser focused insight into every detail of this deeply disturbing case! Love your channel!!
Came over from Popcorned Planet. Love your input on all of this, can't wait to watch all the videos
I remember seeing her saying that but at the time, it didn’t register to me how wrong it was for her to do so. At the end of the day when the judge reiterated to the jury not to do any research etc, it clicked to me what I’d heard her say earlier. I do find it quite funny that even IF any jurors did any research online, how still, nothing “swayed” them from their final decisions 😋
Amber is SO use to “breaking the rules” she encourages others to do so. Subornation of Perjury is when you encourage witnesses to commit perjury. Amber not only lied and committed perjury, she encouraged other to do so.
Oh when it happened live, I noticed as did the majority of LawTube. I specifically remember Emily D Baker getting her feathers ruffled at "look us up online" Emily spazzing "You can't do that! (Something similar to the effect of) Why aren't the laws admonishing her or asking the judge to strike or instrust the witness". I lost it. AH instructing the Jury on live national TV to break their oath, it was a bad look; like getting caught instructing an officer of the law to break the law. Only reason it's funny is she was dumb enough to do and say it in 4k for the world to see and hear.🤣
if the jury looked online they might have found how AH abused her ex-girlfriend
@@spamachuchan8824 Maybe they just let it slide, because it would've sounded like they're trying to hide something. Especially considering that the jury wouldn't actually have been able to look up what they were talking about.
Or they simply trusted the jury to know the rules.
The judge told the jury to avoid MSM and Internet stories about the case. However, Elaine brought these stories up in court, thus reinforcing the jury’s negative opinion of Amber.
Exactly! Amber and Elaine are so full of it. "How could they NOT look up the trial online? It's everywhere, it's unavoidable."
Amber, you literally told them to look you and Johnny up online. And if they did, which I believe they DID NOT, they still voted against you. Amber's team brought in a social media expert who INFORMED the Jury about what the reaction is to the ongoing trial. The UK trial was also based on lies.
@@SoldMySoul45 Elaine and Amber, what a perfect pairing.
Great point. Also (you probably already know this) if you want to use another clip, RottenBorn in his cross examination of Johnny questioned him for quite a while on the UK case. I believe he wanted JD to reveal the UK verdict by mistake, because the lawyers knew they weren’t allowed to. They wanted the jury to know the UK verdict in hopes that it would influence their ruling. So deceptive indeed!
Yes, it's right about Rotten Burn. Me also I heard 'n saw this moment in this trial. I judged this biased moment as an intentional trick on JD. Fortunately, lawyer Camilla Vasquez interrupted this maneuver (a bit late, in my opinion).
Excellent catch! 👍 👍 👍
Thank you so much for pointing this out . In my humble opinion she is so in contempt of court suggesting this to the court (the jury) both her and her team . Unbelievable . What the heck is Elaine thinking . She needs to be careful or she s going to end up being struck off .
Elain should be disbarred.
In U.K. sure she would be
Imo AH was in contempt back in March when Johnny's side reveled to the Judge that AH did not hand over her devices that she was instructed to do by the court back in November. AH is contempt at this point, she's not in it, she is it. 🤣
I was wondering about that. By suggesting to the jury that they do some illegal reasearch is this contempt of court?
I really hope the uk reopen this defamation case. I did sign the petition when you first put it out as I believe justice matters. 👩⚖️👨⚖️
I signed the petition too. And another one to have Elaine investigated for her professional misconduct with the lies she was spreading in those TV interviews.
And me I signed it ,
murdoch is too powerful
@@johnsmith99997 Ah yes. U have a good point.
@@johnsmith99997 Yes he may be powerful but no one is above the law. My hope in the justice system may be a little too optimistic, however, meanwhile I have faith.
I learned about gaslighting on this trial. Incredible how confusing all of this is for us. And how isolated it is for a real victim. 🙏🏽🕊Love this channel and all the education provided. Thank you!!
Swinging by to check you out from Popcorned Planet. 🍿
Thank you for all that you do. 🥰
Welcome! 😁 thanks to Andy!
I've thought from the beginning of the trial that Miss Turd's only hope was to go for a miss trial, the more her testimony gets scrutinised the more I believe that's what they were trying to do.
Amen 👏
Heard asked the jury to look up the UK trial and social media at least twice each. Her team also discussed the hashtags, detailing which hashtags were trending and the jury were told again to look it up online, by Heard.
They encouraged the jury to do outside research. I've commented about this on your and other channels.
Yup.
Also, the abuse she was recieving online was personal opinion, commentators and pundits. It was not by JDs team, there were accusations that Johnny Depp was encouraging or paying for people to sway public opinion, but that was not presented as part of the evidence of his abuse. Trying to blame JD for the hashtags or any abuse is a huge leap. Which tells you that she can't link her behaviour to the consequences she's facing. But expects JD to be cancelled and kept cancelled despite any legal outcomes. Again, speaks volumes about her and only proves Dr Curry right in her assessment.
@@bugs5377 100% accurate and true!!!💯💯💥💥👍👍💥💥💯
Another great analysis 👏
So that’s why they keep banging on about it. Their plan didn’t work. They expected everyone - including the jury - to look it all up online, but *they thought* that would influence people in Amber’s favour. They can’t believe the jury found in JD’s favour, when as far as they were concerned, Amber was victorious in the UK and must therefore be the victim, and therefore would have to win this case.
This is why they brought in the hashtags as well. That was a weird thing to do, considering they weren’t positive towards Amber.
Obviously, the bat-shit craziness of Amber herself infected her team as well… my god, they’re a manipulative bunch. Scary stuff. I hope people abandon the “Elaine is a very good lawyer, but…” She’s not a very good lawyer. She might be effective sometimes, but she’s manipulative, evasive, divisive, Machiavellian and - IMHO - corrupt. I have zero respect for Elaine (or Rottenborn) for the part they played in this. They knew the evidence out there that didn’t come into the trial, like the recording after Johnny’s finger was cut off, and they played it out with utter deception every which way they could. They KNEW Amber was responsible, they had her recording admitting it, but they span it in court that Johnny cut it off himself… That’s just sick.
I believe someone somewhere sad “you get the lawyers you deserve”… Looks like Amber’s team were perfect for her. Bunch of dodgy con-artists and gaslighters.
All just my thoughts and opinions.
Thank you for covering this!!! I've been saying this and talking about it ever since, but no one else seems to be talking about it!
Brilliantly put! She is so deep into her lies that she is constantly tripping over her own deceptions and delusions!
Amber did it more than once in the trial. "Look me up" was also said when she was complaining about social media.
AWESOME 🔥
I'm so glad I discovered your fantastic channel through this crazy trial man 💪🏽
The one time she didn't lazer stare the jury while talking. LOL!!!
And at the same time in her testimony she was complaining about how bad social media etc. treat her and she said you can look me up online. So she said it more than once to the Jury, to look her up and trying to get them to. Just like Rottenborn also argued this was not Depp's first time telling his story and that he was in another trial.
I recall her lawyer mentioning the evidence from the UK. Yes your correct with your assessment of the situation.
Best
Thank you!! Noone else has pointed this out. I was always yelling at the screen, hey, you told them to do it and then complain.
That is such an excellent point! Thank you for sharing this as well as all of your other legal insights.
I feel that there were so many instances like this one and some of the very leading examination, by Rottenborn especially, that seems to have been tailored to try to create an argument for a mistrial. Perhaps they were afraid of this Judge sitting because she seemed unswayable. Which would account for them being so nice to her in court and maligning her after the fact.
Thank you so much for your valuable time and the great measures that you take to explain this case, as well as all of the other issues you expound upon. It is fascinating to be able to see the inner workings of our respective judicial systems.
Wow by what you are saying Amber was setting up the jury to go on line and as such she was hoping that they would. That makes sense why Amber and Elaine attacked the Jury stating they must of looked at social media....awesome BBB very well investigated
I love how you have picked apart this trial, you have put their testimony under a legal microscope. You have broken it down in a clear and concise way, making it interesting and easy to understand for an average person. I have become a member of the law nerd army and am fascinated by the intricacies of trials and having a UK barrister explain things from the England and Wales legal system is utterly fascinating.
Thank you
Completely missed this! Thank you for bringing it out. 👏🏻👏🏻
Is it possible that AH's team were aiming for a mistrial, right from the start? Would there have been any benefit for her side in attempting to do so? The number of direct and indirect inducements for the jury to do outside research, made by AH, her lawyers, and her social media "experts", just seemed a little odd. Plus, she broke court rules by posting on social media on the first day of the trial.
Totally agree. And her partner, the journalist, broke court rules passing stuff to them in court. They were aiming all along for this - either to achieve a mistrial during the proceedings, or in their appeal. They thought that of course the jury would go online (if promoted enough), and that the jurors would report each other and there’d be a mistrial.
Imho
that's y amber had said dat Johnny depp s lawyers were good at distracting the jury..mean a she n her lawyers wabted to do this all along.
I thought that on day one where Elaine referred to her as Laura Amber Heard.
Yes...I think they were legit trying for a mistrial that is also why Elaine made comments like "I'm trying".
They want a mistrial because they want a judge who was against it being live. They knew their evidence was worth 💩 so they needed a judge who could be manipulated, and someone willing to broadcast it live is way less likely to be corrupt since it is recorded.
Also her friend giving her phone to heards lawyers with texts from the last trial in UK from Mr Depps witness. Boy do this lot play dirty. But what can you expect she's been doing it from the get go.Karma can't come soon enough for this lot.
I caught this awhile ago , during the trial, and wondered WHY she would tell them to research HER, and the bad reactions she’s been getting online when she KNOWS they weren’t supposed to and were admonished every day about going on social media. Was she trying to throw the case?
Petition, yes
They even brought the hate on line in their case. Amber Turd and all the other hashtags was part of their argument to blame the jurors of knowing what was on line. Were they tanking their case on purpose, to cause a mistrial ,or did they want a new trial with a different judge that would give them more allowances?
@@reginafetty6374 what I thought too
Thank you BBB! I thought she was directing them to search the internet, but at the time I had three thoughts:
1. She was looking for a mistrial.
2. They would search the internet and find JD’s supporters.
3. They would see msm twists of what was going on in trial and compare it to reality of courtroom.
No matter what, I thought it a mistake. I think you hit the nail on the head!
What a great insight! I wondered why they were talking so much about it being the internet. She PLANTED IT in peoples' minds, then assumed the jury would do it. Sneaky!
It is a gift to be able to hear your analysis.
Your professional opinion and counsel is very much appreciated.
Thank you from Texas
🙏
HTX!
@@kkent4174 HTown as well!!
@@cip6349 Dope City Centre for me! Ugly day out but all the great ATurd news is lovely 🤣
@@kkent4174 scary sw side here
😳
I was sweating at 730 this morning!!! But you are right...this insanity is a great distraction.
I'm not a celebrity follower person, but this case has been a real eye opener!
@@cip6349 same for the heat and the celebrity following loolZ
Having watched a few video analysis of testimony and post trial interviews I am struck by the calmness and poise of Johnny Depp's lawyers during the questioning of Amber Heard and even when herds lawyers were asking questions that at minimum insinuated there was another trial. Johnny Depp's team to the best of my knowledge never objected to questions except maybe one time. And I think that was really smart because that would have drawn attention to that trial which would have required a lot of contextual explanations. But rather than try to shut it down they work around it through other media posts that Amber Heard had to show her character. Really smart lawyers He's a lucky guy
I'm actually really grateful you're doing this, and looking at the UK case. It's a relief from a the Gaslighting by AH, her team & MSM. Especially since the stories changed so much btw UK & US. Great work. Subbed!
Wow your really working hard, brilliant work👍
So good to hear someone talk about this. I’ve not heard anyone mention it since the day she said it.
Look at Ben Chew immediately looking at the judge when she says that. Their strategy (AH team) is bit by bit revealed and it is looking bad for her. I don't think she will ever get any role, AH is done, finished, she better buys a ticket to Mars, perhaps the Mollusk can give her one 🤣
Lidia Lopez Martin -yeah, I definitely thought that same thing too!!!! NO ONE would miss her !!
Wow you are amazing I didn't catch on to this your so good at this I have shared this to twitter thank you for pointing this out and all your hard work
This is absolutely brilliant work… This is the first time I’ve heard anyone point out such a blatant invitation to the jurors to break their oath.
Reviews were saying that she was the one talking about social media more than anyone. Just directing them to the internet should have been admonished, removed or whatever. She better not appeal.
Way too many lawyers said they would of never taken her as a client ...even ones who going into it believed her. SHE IS OBVIOSLY a COMPULSIVE liar and looney...and only a similar type lawyer would of taken her.
She can appeal, but it'll be shot down because a) the judge didn't make any mistakes in rulings b) there is no *new* evidence and c) there was no impropriety with the jury. Those are basically the only things that can cause an appeal to be granted in the US 🇺🇸 I thought these interviews were her lawyers and herself trying to find grounds to appeal- but wow! They're just screwing themselves.
Thank you. You need to send this and all your analysis to Depp's lawyers just in case they haven't realised some of these things and Amber's lawyer's try to argue about social media in the appeal!
Johnny's lawyers know what's going on. They are letting her dig her own grave. They won. They don't need Dateline.
They will be rejected by courts if they try to use any of that lame excuse.
Very good point
I am not a lawyer, but anyone who has been watching this trial will come to the opinion that AH and her team were tempting the jury to go to social media.
I have just emailed Ms Vasquez about this point.
Wow. Great observation! Enjoying your channel.
Heyyy 👋 Andy from popcorn planet recommended this channel to me x great content, thank you x
You could say that she meant “whose being abused online.” As in “online” abuse. We all know that’s not what she meant but I bet her team would argue that.
That's what I heard, too. But that makes no sense in the context of the question. They were discussing if JD were an abuser. "He IS an abuser and you can look either of us up online and figure out who's being abused online."
You and I can't be hearing it right because that's a nonsense thing to say.
Or.... AH could be full of nonsense. I can't dismiss that possibility. I think she was absolutely trying to say what BBB thinks she said (in context) but had a slip of the tongue or a Freudian slip and let it out that she was most upset about online criticism.
@@vociferonheraldofthewinter2284 I totally agree. I just know how she twists things to suit her won narrative. Like when she said “I wasn’t telling him to go and ask the world if they would believe him”. Oh yes you flippin were!!!!
@@vociferonheraldofthewinter2284 She could have meant it to imply that JD was/is behind the campaign of online "abuse" against her, but I too thought her answer at the time didn't make much sense.
I thought exactly that when I first heard it, but as Vociferon above says it was non sensical to the question. I didn't think much of it at the time.
That's exactly what she is saying, hence using the word online twice in the sentence, strange that Barrister quotes it wrong multiple times in this video. Yes it doesn't respond to the question very well, if at all, but she's a spaz so who knows!
I remember her saying that and thinking how wrong she was to imagine the jury knowing the extreme online sentiment against her would be to her advantage. She's a mess of psych pathology.
Hallelujah! Someone with legal clout is explicitly exposing this! You are a judicial rockstar!
You are awesome! Thanks for sharing!!
It was deliberate. The only question is whether it was AH's own idea or if EB came up with that nonsense. It backfired - either the jury did not take the bait and refused to break their oath, or if any of them did check social media or news, that still made no difference. Because the facts before them proved AH to be utterly untrustworthy. EB jumping straight into TV interviews was her attempt to smear the jury - likely to push for a mistrial.
This is from AH's 2014 interview from W Magazine: "Whenever my old friends meet someone I'm involved with romantically, they immediately warn them: She may look refined, but when she's angry, she can go trailer park really fast,'" THESE ARE HER OWN WORDS IN A PRINTED INTERVIEW. Why is nobody aware of this?
And her own sister voiced concern that she would end up killing JD. You can bet she's attacked many people in her life.... and her father seems like a piece of work. There are text messages from him online where he talks about introducing JD to his rifle... cos the money JD was gonna give him for a prophecy want gonna materialise. She's trailer yeah in a nice frock and tons of makeup. I'd hate to disagree with her while she's drunk. Nasty violent abusive woman
Trailer Park suits her, she should go back 😉
I’ve seen that .
Man, congratulations for your channel, thank you for your time , information and support the ones that are confused about this... cheers 👍🍺, appreciated
Amazing catch!!! You are the best!
"I'm not here to relitigate"
Goes ahead and asks jury to research online.
If that's not indicating towards the seeking a relitigation then what is?
This woman is a mass of contradictory atoms. A total mess of a human.
Thank you for having original comments! Several people like repeating/copy paste comments, a joke or something they copied from reddit rather than having a original thought! It is refreshing to see people who type what the think regardless of ‘likes’. Thanks for that AdM💯🏴☠️
@@SaltStorm007 Thanks mate. I've been seeing you as well in many threads and videos on this topic and I like them too for your originality.
Btw, I don't use reddit or twitter much except very very rarely when I need to only. Typing your thoughts goes a longer way to express your thoughts than copy pasting from other sources. The likes shouldn't matter as long as we express genuine thoughts and opinions. That apart, let's hope this drama ends well for the greater good of justice soon. It's been keeping so many people on their toes unnecessarily just because of a single drama queen with entitlement and deep narcissim.
@@AdMBandLeader ABSOLUTELY! It is more about putting you opinions and thoughts down....whether people ‘like’ them or not is secondary or not even really much of a factor TBH. This has been a WONDERFULLY thing for all victims especially male victims & that is an issue that I feel strongly about having gone through it myself and knowing first hand the UTTER BS male victims go through and how they are almost COMPLETELY ignored by society and the court system. If my ex wife had the evidence that I had against her I would probably still be in jail and yet it was dismissed by the judge who didn’t even look at the evidence or me...I felt like I was in the twilight zone. This trial has been a much needed light on this issue and they just keep going with these interviews and articles trying to convince us that what we saw wasn’t actually what we saw🤯It is also rather infuriating that they even do this because NO ABUSIVE MAN ON EARTH would be embraced by the media like Amber has and frankly it’s disgusting to behold! I am glad that she is such a narcissist that she is oblivious to how dumb she is coming off and how she would be better served just STFU and staying home but then again we would have all this entertainment and laughs! Hope you and your family have a blessed one and I will see you next TUG livestream! Not sure if they celebrate fathers day where you are but HAPPY FATHERS DAY nonetheless 💯🏴☠️
She's actually very smart. Calculating and manipulative. --- its just that the "average " people out here are much better at detecting her bs. Hahahaha!
@@charliewright3884 not all narcissists think things through, they expect they can wing it (met a few) so they may be quite smart but once spotted the games up 🤣🤣🤣 that’s when their contempt & stupidity come in to play 👍
I'll be playing devil's advocate here: I think at that moment maybe AH was just talking about the abuse she was receiving online, since she says "which of us is being abused online"... but agreed, I think both AH and her team definitely did want the UK judgement to come into evidence.
Yeah me too. She was saying, during the trial, I (AH) have been getting abused and JD was getting support.
Which is true, because…. She was lying. Through. Her. Teeth.
Well if she was being abused online the jury still found her guilty
Thank you so much for your time! I live your channel. Greetings from Spain!
Wow an exceptional catch, one of the great parts of having it all broadcast is we can show point out this hypocrisy. Thanks for putting in the leg work !
I found this trial fascinating to watch and I sometimes wish that our court cases were televised. I watched Runkle of the Bailey, Law & Lumber (who actually works in that courthouse and has said that the judge was in the Marine Corps) as well as The DUI Guy who all sat in court watching the jury. I remember that these guys would say how engaged they thought the jury were and they didnt engage much with AH, they preferred to look at JD's lawyers.
Rumpole
Could AH, making that statement to the jury during the trial, be held in contempt on 6/24/22 for going against the courts admonishment about social media? Wow, total insidious actions from AH & her team of lawyers. I hope JDs team uses this in court on the 24th. Great job! I love this channel and all the hard work you put in to bringing this information forward. ♥️🙏♥️
Another good point as always, doing great work.
Absolutely brilliant 🤩 Thankyou for unpacking the detail as you do…
WOW! I never thought of that. Great catch
this is an essential video to watch to understand narcissistic people. She showed way to much confidence in this video. thank you for all your hard work you put in these videos..
THANK YOU! This was a major 'what the?' moment for me. Why were they allowed to encourage outside research to the jury and then turn around and complain that the jury was probably swayed by outside influence? What an absolute joke of a legal representation.
Love your thoughts on this, great channel, glad popcorn planet pointed me to you.
You are so on it!!! She absolutely wanted the jury to look her up and find the UK judgement. Even Rottenborn bought up the UK trial when he was cross examing, Johnny, in the hope they would find the judgement! 🤬😡
I very well remember her inviting the jury to look her up. It's the first thought that came to my mind when I heard Elaine's claims on TV.
You are absolutely right thank you for pointing that snippet to us...never caught this one and it is a very important one.
Great catch! And you are exactly right!
Brilliant, I thought Amber said to look them up on line! Thank you for showing this for all to see. This actually is a brilliant learning case for professionals and students in a number of career paths.
The whole trial has provided so much teaching material - for law students, psychologists, behavioural experts and more. It's the gift that keeps giving. Including a creative wave of memes.
@@citadelofwinds1564 absolutely! Psychology is my natural born gift and I nearly pursued a legal career having worked for a litigation solicitor. I ended up pursuing first my sports career then entrepreneurship where my psychology gift/studies became second nature professionally and personally. Now my main work is in conscious relationships and I have to say, red flags were flying all around AH immediately she began testifying. My heightened intuition went into overdrive, at that point, even though I was attempting to keep an open mind! I've deliberately sought out professionals in law, psychology, behavioural analysts etc, etc to get their perspective. They're all saying the same things and exactly what my immediate thoughts were and still are. I've added to my own skills already .... good for me, my relationships and to assist my students and clients. This is the only thank you I can give to AH! 😂🙏.
Side note, I've been in verbally abusive relationships with severe narcissists, thankfully on the other side of that via healing. Those types don't stand a chance now, one recently attempted to rekindle our toxic thing but he realised there was no way back. I'd done the work and healing plus lots of life changes. It was very powerful to forgive him but to have clear boundaries having moved on long ago.
She said it and she was directing it towards the jury. Great observation I missed this.
I truly love your program here you are so precise and you really break it down and it makes so much sense thank you
I'm absolutely gobsmacked, what an outstanding catch on your part! 👏👏
On the Friday night aired interview they deleted when she said, “you and I” from her statement the “average person doesn’t have the same resources” but it was in the sneak peak! On June 24th court date , do you know if that will be on court tv like the trial was?
I also noticed another cut out from the sneak peaks to the "full" interview. When the were talking about the freedom of speech and Amber said in the sneak peak (paraphrasing) "Its not just about speaking truth...its about speaking truth to power...and that's all that I did... I spoke truth to power!" The full interview ENDED that part at "and that's all that I did" they pulled out the "I spoke truth to power!" line, which to me looks like a way to try to reinforce Amber's words that she spoke just the "truth", and not that idiotic "truth to power" nonsense.
@@The_Haneys I missed that one, Good catch! I really hope they put a stop to her being able to still try and defame him and ridiculing the jury. Social media was her friend when it suited “her” truth but now the jury and people see her true character the social media is nothing but bad.
You’re where I go to for legal advice, thank you 👌
Very good point!! 👏🏻 'look either of us up online, wanting them to look up the UK judgement but then when they lost the case "oh the jury must have looked online" 🤦🏼♀️
New subscriber from Andy over at Popcorned Planet!!! You nailed this!!! This woman blows my mind. Unreal. Great job at catching this!!
CONTRARY to the judge's direction at each adjournment NOT TO DO RESEARCH - contempt of court - perverting the course of justice - or BOTH?
Ha! And here, it was the [first] time that she didn’t even look at the jury when she responded with that suggestion!
She was slick; to make no eye-contact with the jury; but made sure to get her “request” across to them! What a piece of work she is! 🤦🏻♀️😂
I picked that up too! She told them to research her and then complained that social media had influenced the outcome! 🤔
Great catch.. thank you for making this video .. !!
Love listening to you explaining this mess..thanx NZ.
Well in law is that a defendant-directing the jury to look up outside the four walls of the court room, which the judge directed them not to, is that illegal?
Truly excellent spotting this. It was for sure a suggestion to the jury. Devious beyond words on her behalf!
Thank you, great video. Watched b/c Popcorned Planet recommended you
Welcome! 😁