Kashmir को India में नहीं मिलाना चाहते थे Sardar Patel, फिर किसने उनकी सोच बदली? | Patel Vs Nehru
Vložit
- čas přidán 31. 10. 2018
- Much has been said about Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel's differences on the annexation of Kashmir to the Indian Union. We will tell you where they agreed and disagreed through the medium of this video.
What is the story in history? Both Gandhi and Nehru wanted Kashmir to be included with India. But what did Patel want? VP Menon was Mountbatten's political advisor. He has a book written - 'The Story of the Integration of the Indian States'. It has written in detail that what is the story behind the native princely states that were merged in India at the time of Partition. There is a contradiction in Patel's words as somewhere he says that he has no differences with Nehru while somewhere he disagrees. Once again, the same Patel says that the Kashmir problem would be solved, but could not solve it because of Nehru. Sometimes they disagree on the decision to go to the UN, sometimes they defend it. Sometimes he says that the ceasefire was not right. Had the army not been sent from Banihal to Poonch, then things would have been settled.
Watch the video to know the complete story.
#SardarPatel #PatelOnKashmir #NehruOnKashmir
Install The Lallantop Android App: thelallantop.app.link/zCSsHooQSU
Follow us on: / thelallantop
Like The Lallantop on Facebook: / thelallantop
Follow The Lallantop on Twitter: / thelallantop
For advertisements e-mail us at: Ads@thelallantop.com
Produced By: The Lallantop
Edited By: Radhe Shyam
दी लल्लनटॉप का ऐंड्रॉयड ऐप इंस्टॉल करिए और फीडबैक दीजिए: play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.thelallantop
nikhil Ji aapki maine to Nehru aur Patel ke beech matbhed tabhi maine jaate jab Patel Ji khule kaam Nehru Ji ki baaten cut karete. kya Patel Ji ne Nehru Ji ke. PM hone ka samman rakha to galat kiya?
Lallan top congress ki gaand chatate rahta he
czcams.com/video/_3HFNqforiM/video.html
Hear this ,real speech of Patelji on Kashmir... Lallantop had Hoti h kuchchh bhi bakwaash krne ki
Bilkul ek trafa
I have noticed Lallantop channel recently has started very sutlely favouring one party in opposition and have started demeaning the Govt of the day...Its not just this reporter..others...please be unbaised... otherwise what is the difference
सरदार साहब ने कभी भी देश की एक इंच ज़मींन छोड़ने की न बात की ,और ना ऐसा सोंचा! जय जय सरदार साहब
सच्चाई जान ले नेहरु और पटेल दोनो पक्के कांग्रेसी थे पटेल ने बीजेपी ज्वाइन नही की थी 😀
@@MrBhadoriya fir bhi congress party ne unake contribution ko kabhi acknowledge hi nahi kiya ....
@@shivamishra2338 sab congressi hai itna bht hai 😁😁
@@druvshuka3132 suno tab ki congress ab ki congress bahut antar hai . Ab ek family hai bas congress
@@shivamishra2338 ye kisne kah diya tumse😂😂😂
Koi maane ya naa mane patel was the great person who is my one and only inspiration 🙇🙇
Yes..
No .... netaji subhas Chandra was😍😍🥰🥰🥰
@@sanketsdrawings1206 yeah!!woh bhi the pride of ur country😤
👍
X
,
कुछ भी कर लो......कभी भी सरदार पटेल की अहमियत कम नहीं होगी।
सरदार पटेल भारत माता का वीर सपूत और अनमोल रतन थे।
Practically pak se bat krke kashmir issue solve krna chahiye y india k lie bhtr hai pakistan ka kya unko economy se Lena nhi hme hai security pr billions of dollars kharch krne pdte hai sirf kashmir valley me 8 lakh army hai or vo mrte hai to pension alag se or Russia central Asia eu se trade bhi nhi krskte Pakistan k raste se isse billions nuksan hota hai pak k sath trade🤔🧐😐
Hme ise solve krna chahiye dono jagah k kashmir valley ko alag desh bna Dena chahiye Jammu laddakh india or gilgit baltistan pak rkhle practical solutions se fayda hoga😐🧐
सरदार पटेल, जवाहरलाल नेहरू और महात्मा गांधी ये तीनों महान लोग हमारे स्वतंत्रता संग्राम के त्रिमूर्ति थे।
Anmol Ratan to vo h Sardar Patel ko tum RRS Sanghi apne vote bank ke liye acha bolate ho patel to khud bolate the ye RRS sanghi desh ke liye khatra h
It was very tough situations to resolve for Nehru ji & Patel both. Had Raja Hari Singh willingly merged in India, there would not have been Kashmir issue but Raja wanted an Independent Kashmir.
Agree
हकीकत यह है कि उस वक्त की परिस्थितियों के अनुसार ही निर्णय लिए गये थे.
आज बड़ा आसान है सही-गलत ठहराना.
Sahi bole bhai
Sahi hai
Nucd
Nicd
Mai aap lsd sahmat hoon Jo aap kaise sochne wale logo ki jarurat hai aaj hamare desh ko
लौह पुरुष सरदार वल्लभ भाई पटेल को शत शत नमन
सरदार वल्लभ भाई पटेल सच्चे मायने मैं आज के भारत के जनक है। जो नक्शा आज हम देखते है वो सरदार वल्लभ पटेल की देन है । उन्हें अगर भारत का राष्ट्रपिता कहा जाए तो ये अतिशयोक्ति नही होगी।
Yadi aap ka bat man liya Jay to aap batay ki Patel ka chunaw PM ke pakchh me tha to nehru ko PM kis liy banaya gaya
@@RameshSingh-zl6uk क्योकि उनके माउंटबेटन से अच्छे संबंध नही थे ।
@@RameshSingh-zl6uk Gandhi ki wajah se pm nhi ban paye Gandhi ko lgata tha agar nehru ji nhi pm bane to kangress party khatm karwa denge baki Mountbatten se bhi achhe sambandh the Nehru ji ke
@@chandrashekharshukla1596ye bhi h bhai unki Umar us vakat jayada thi or bimari ke karan bhi unko pm nahi banaya or vase bhi thik kiya tha congress ne us vakat jo kaam patel ne kiya us vakat koi or nahi kar sakta tha dono neta Nehru or patel apni apni jagah sahi the desh ke liye acha hi kiya
फेंकते रहो इंडिया का जो भी बना वो 4 5 साल से लगे कई दिमागों की उपज थी अकेले पटेल से कुछ नही हुआ।
Very well presented facts...the clarity, body language & the dignified posture of the presenter is as important as the matter itself...This young man has done a splendid job..Thanks
सरदार पटेल भारत का एक अनमोल हीरा थे। वे नहीं होते तो शायद आज का भारत भी नहीं होता।🇮🇳सरदार पटेल को नमन 🙏🙏
Arey bhaia Gandhi ji ko bilkul hi bhool gaye?
@@shamimahmad5816 गांधी जी को कोई नहीं भूला लेकिन यहां बात भारत की अखंडता की हो रही है, जो की सरदार पटेल की वजह से हैं।
Bhai akhnadata tu mughal aur british ki den hain.....hindu kal me india 200 state me bate huye te
@@indiamylove4833 भाई अखंडता अंग्रेजो की देन कैसे हुईं, अगर अंग्रेजो ने भारत को एक किया तो फिर आज़ादी के वक्त अंग्रेजो ने 565 रियासतों को ये मौका कैसे दिया की वे अलग हो सकते हैं या पाकिस्तान में जुड़ सकते हैं। अगर भारत एक था तो फिर तो ये सुझाव आ ही नहीं सकता था। और मुगलों की बात यहां कैसे आई अगर मुगलों ने पहली बार एक किया था भारत को तो भाई बता दू कि सबसे पहले चंद्रगुप्त मौर्य ने भारत को एक जुट किया था।
पटेल जी की सोच आज भी देश की एकता में शक्ति दे रही है
Tabhi toh patel bah atankwadiiiii hai
Nahi , Sardar kii soch ke naam par aaj desh ko kucch 50 lac crore ka chuna lag chukaa hai , ( Bade industrialists ke paas fd ki gayi hai ) des 50 saal pichhe kar diyaa gayaa hai aur Sardar ki ektaa tahas - nahas ki gayi hai.
@@maahimann64 source dedo ki 50 lac crore ka chuna lag gaye.....mtlb kaha ka data h zara batana 😁
अगर नेहरू और पटेल में मन भेद होता या पटेल नेहरू के खिलाफ होते तो पटेल प्रधान मंत्री बनते क्योंकि कांग्रेस कमेठी पटेल के समर्थन में थी और वो वोटिंग के आधार पर प्रधानमंत्री बन जाते लेकिन उन्होंने ऐसा नहीं किया
पटेल सिर्फ हरिसिंह को ये बोल रहे थे कि हरिसिंह खुद फैसला करे कि उनको कहाँ जाना है ।
इसका मतलब ये कैसे हुआ कि पटेल भारत में काशमीर का विलय नही चाहते थे ।
Patel hari singh ki ichhansar chahtey they lekin janmat sangrah ki bhi baat kertey they, janmat sangrah mein kashmir mein muslim aabadi honey ke natey hamarey hath se nikal sakta tha isliye janmat na hona hi hamaarey liye theek tha.
@@shamimahmad5816 bilkul sahi
@@shamimahmad5816yaah patel is iron man ..
@@shamimahmad5816 🇮🇳आपने बिल्कुल सही कहा है, परन्तु आज सरदार पटेल को संघ+भाजपा अपने इतिहास में शामिल करने के लिए मनघड़ंत तर्क बनाकर जनता को भ्रमित कर रहे हैं। क्योंकि इनके गिरोह का इतिहास तो देश के साथ गद्दारी का रहा है। सरदार पटेल को आतंकी गोडसे और माफीवीर सावरकर में मिलाकर गोडसे को विश्वगुरु का पद दिलाना चाहते हैं।पटेल भी कांग्रेसी थे,अगर नेहरू जी और गांधी जी को पटेल से नफ़रत होती तो देश के सबसे महत्वपूर्ण पद पर क्यों बैठाते। पटेल और संघ+भाजपा वालों की विचारधारा ही एक दूसरे के विपरित है, पटेल जोड़ने वाले थे, यह तोड़ने वाले हैं। पटेल ने गांधी जी से कहा था कि कश्मीर पाकिस्तान में जाए तो मुझे कोई दिक्कत नहीं है। मुझे यहां के सेव अच्छे लगते हैं, जिन्हें मैं टैक्स देकर मंगवा लिया करूंगा। नेहरू जी ने कहा था कि कश्मीर हमारे दिल की धड़कन है मेरे जीते-जी कश्मीर को पाकिस्तान में शामिल नहीं होने दूंगा। वैसे भी नेहरू जी कश्मीरी पंडित थे इसलिए कश्मीर उनके लिए अतिप्रिय होना लाजमी है। लेकिन इतिहास के गद्दारों (अंग्रेजों के मुखबिरों) की देश द्रोही नस्लें अच्छों को बुरा साबित कर देश को लूटने के लिए तरत-तरह के नुस्खों का अविष्कार करते रहते हैं। आज इनके बेशर्म मुंह ज्वालामुखी बनकर देशभक्तों की शहादतों पर दिन-रात लावा उगलते रहते हैं। 🇮🇳जय हिन्द 🇮🇳
Saradar patel is one of the best.. Person.. Today is say to easy what do patel in his time.. he give your best in his time.. Respect to saradar vallabh bhai patel..iandian ayarn men.. Is best...love you patel sir.. My roll model.. Patel sir🙏🙏
Thats what narrator is saying if we were not present then we must not blame anybody. And if we want to blame someone then the culprit is fucker jinnah and british who just created problems kashmir,palestine and many more.
Same goes with Nehru... people should not blame nehru as the situation was not easy at that time...
@@Toptrending02Apni community ko Samjhao ki Desh ko ander se barbad na kare
@@Toptrending02 czcams.com/video/TvXPVkw3E3w/video.html
@@utkarshparihar9855 czcams.com/video/TvXPVkw3E3w/video.html
Janmat Sangrah hona chahiye tha to aasaani se kashmir India ka ho jata.
🇮🇳Jai Hind🇮🇳
Jai Hind
Very informative balanced approach.
Ha jese muslman Bharat ko vote dete 🤣🤣
Very knowledgeable and inspiring video.
We really appreciate and value the trouble taken by you in preparing and educating us.
God bless you
Genuine, honest, near the truth.
Let people decide and not the media shall divert public opinion towards particular interests psychologicaly ...but
Media to open the true information for public opinion.
Appreciated.
SB Patel was great human🌹🙏🌹
Sardar patal was the Hero of indian history
It is a very good clarification. Both Patel and Nehru were freedom fighters. There was no rift between the two. Difference of opinion always happens but Bapu was their leader who used to sort out their differences. No one should cast any aspersions on our past leaders who were great Patriots.
तूं झूठा है।ये कहां का झूठ परोसा रहा है बे बच्चे? सारी सच्चाई बहुत पहले सबूत सहित जनता को मालूम हो चुका है। तुम्हारी सारी बातें झूठ पर आधारित है।चूप रह देशद्रोही लल्लन गदहा।
Right
But lallantop and AajTak both are part of same India today midea family then why they make opposite propoganda on there respective plateforms?
For Patel to be a successful Home Minister, he had to have the unwavering support of the PM, irrespective of their differences and that’s exactly what Nehru gave Patel. If any PM undermines the HM then how can the HM be successful? Patel led the way in integrating the princely states in India but Nehru stood by Patel all the way. They were close friends and colleagues, not enemies as some people have tried to portray them.
@@NetfreetomeJisko jo news pasand aa jaye - aap Modi bhakt ho ya anti-Modi, Zee chahta hai ki aap unka hi koi channel dekhen jisse ki ad ka paisa unhe milta rahe.
सरदार पटेल शुरू से ही कश्मीर को भारत में मिलाना चाहते थे शुरू की सोच जो है कश्मीर को भारत में मिलाना था सोच सोच की बात कहां से आ गई
नेहरू ने तो देही दिया था पर सरदार साहेब ने लिख दिया था की 370 कलम राष्ट्रपति के कहने पर हटा सकते है और कश्मीर परमनेंट भारत का होगा इस लिए आज कश्मीर भारत के पास है हमे गर्व है साहेब पर
Eye tu soch le beta pakistan or India bhai hai tera bhai ko tera baap kaa daulat main se barabar ki hissa dega yaa nehi tera bhai ka sabaal hai ye ye to chalta hai india main bhai bhai kabarar milta hai
काश सरदार पटेल जी भारत के पहले प्रधानमंत्री होते तो कब का पाकिस्तान भी हमारा होता |
इससे कश्मीर समस्या ही नहीं पाकिस्तान समस्या भी सुलझ जाती |
Bro he died before first elections
@@nepalichoro6208 mere dost 1947 me vo jinda the ,he died 1951 ,jo sahi hai usse glt karane ke liye ye logic mt do
@@mission4724 tum dono lol ho congress allready sardar Patel ke paksh me thi lekin vah apni marji se hi pm nhi bane kyuki jyada pade likhe nerhru de videsh niti ko chalane ke liye perfect the isliye vo apni marji se nhi bane vo grah mantri bane😂😂
Sardar Patel had successfully integrated most of the princely states through his power of persuasion but he faced acute difficulty in integrating - Junagadh, Hyderabad and Kashmir. The case of Kashmir was different from other states as it had important international boundaries- to the East was Tibet, to the North-East lay the Sinkiang province of China and to the North-West was Afghanistan.
यस यस यस यस यस ... 100 % राईट च संदेश ... धन्यवाद
यह वीडियो biased है
SARDAR VALLABH BHAI PATEL P.M. HOTA TO YE KASHMIR BHARAT KA HI HOTA.
NAHERU GADDAR KI VAJAH OR GANDHI KI VAJAH SE KASHMIR BHARAT KA NAHI HUVA.
YE SUB GANDHI OR NAHERU KI GALATI HAI.
Patel was h minister ,so both Pm Nehuru and Patel gets the cretid, because Nehuru ordered Patel to do the eork
कश्मीर पर जो निर्णय हुआ वह समय और परिस्थिति का तकाजा है.ऐसा ललन टॉप भी मानता है.हम व्यर्थ में किसी को दोष देते हैं.
A well researched and thought provoking video.Thanks a lot.
Thanks for telling the historical truth boldly in facts and details.. Political parties should accept the truth instead throwing garbage on others..so forth I know and read it is same what ever you said very clearly.
ये आर्टिकल सरदार पटेल की अहमियत को कम करने की कोशिश हैं। अगर आप को दलील मान लिया जाए तो फील्ड मार्सल मानिक सॉ के इंटरव्यू देख लो वो क्या कहते हैं कश्मीर के बारे में।
😂😂😂😂
लिंक दे दो
भक्त गण वैसे भी सच हजम नही कर सकते...
इसमें क्या सच है सब झूठ ही झूठ परोस रहा है ।
Sardar Patel has been portrayed here as a confused person in this video while the fact that he was the only clear headed person in the cabinet. Sardar managed 550 riyasats and did not mess up a single one while Nehru managed only J&K riyasat and completely messed up. Sardar gave public statements in support of Nehru only with the purpose of keeping the government and congress united.
Gyan chod diye ...kis book se gyan liye wo v bta do ...
It's a fact in all our history
If you want to check, go to delhi university library and you will find all the evidence in the history hons department
Also Nehru was told by Patel to go to kashmir and add it to India, which he managed to disrupt
I totally agree with you. There may have been minor differences of opinion between them, but the two were great friends and true patriots. While Sardar Patel enjoyed a greater standing and popular support within the Congress organisation, he publicly acknowledged that Nehru was immensely more popular among the masses. In the case of a direct election for the post of PM, Nehru would have won hands down.
You are right . Thankyou.
Nehru ke ishare pe hi patel kam karte the gadhe..nehru pm the
Very fine narrations nd information thankyou well-done keep it up god bless u long live
Very balanced presentation......good conclusion too......the present day politicians make a mockery of the relationship between Nehru and Patel and try to paint a fake image of Nehru sidelining Patel........whereas the truth suggests contrary to this they always consulted each other and took Gandhiji's opinion when they had difference of opinion...the way they conducted themselves with those differences is a big example for those who care for high standards.
Beautiful, balanced presentation, it conveys true historical facts and removes many misconceptions about Patel and Nehru...thanks
भारत के संबंध में ललनटाॅप के विचार राष्ट्रीय शुद्धता से अधिक वाणिज्यिक होती है जो संतुलन बैठाती दिखती है।अंततः सबके साथ मित्रता भी तो निभानी है।
Inko ab pahchan liya gaya hai bhai
Beautiful presentation..
And off-course once time becomes past then we search if-but. But, the reality is when real time goes the original actor takes the decision as per situation and that time this was the demanding decision.. otherwise we may face a huge life crisis and that was not affordable for a new born country.
Informative. Things were said as they were. I think as many people watch this will be beneficial for Nation.
बहुत संतुलित विश्लेषण, आजकल की विभेद व शत्रुता भरी झूठी सच्ची बयानबाजी से अलग, विवेकपूर्ण-- ऐसी शांत समीक्षा के लिए धन्यवाद।
सरदार पटेल सबसे लोकप्रिय नेता थे देश सदा उनका रिणी रहेगा
Very informative dynamic information and chronolog of events over a decade.
सटीक विश्लेषण है।राजनीति के चलते इन दोनों का भरपुर अपमान किया गया है जो देश की आनेवाली पीढी के मन में ज़हर घोलना होगा।
Menon went to Jammu. He informed the Indian government’s decision to the Maharaja, who signed the instrument of accession that Menon had brought. Maharaja reiterated his request in writing for immediate military help, if the state was to be saved. Menon returned to Delhi on the evening of 26 October (with the instrument of accession and Maharaja’s letter) and went straight to the Defence Committee meeting where it was decided to fly an infantry battalion to Srinagar the next day. By the early hours of 27 October, over a hundred planes, civilian as well as military had been assembled. Weapons and supplies were airlifted and before dusk, the first battalion arrived in Srinagar.
When Jinnah heard about the unexpected and prompt airlifting of Indian troops to Srinagar, he flew into a rage. Not prepared to lose the valley, he ordered General Gracey to move troops forthwith into Kashmir. Gracey did not carry out the orders; instead he sought approval of the Delhi based Supreme Commander General Auchinleck who was in charge of all the British officers that remained on either side. Auchinleck refused to oblige Jinnah. But he did not give up his plan. He carried out an invasion of Kashmir by the Frontier tribesman.
The Indian battalion headed by Lt. Col. Ranjit Rai secured the airport and advanced towards Baramulla. In repositioning near Pattan, Rai was killed. But in a couple of days, three more battalions of Indian Army had landed at Srinagar, bringing the number of Indian soldiers to about 2,000 for defending the state’s capital. The attackers were stopped.
Patel had realised immediately that the battle would be long. The only motorable roadlink available to India via Sialkot to Jammu and Srinagar had been snapped with Sialkot having gone to Pakistan after partition. There were great difficulties for Indian troops in moving through tough terrain and difficult passes from Jammu. Patel took upon himself the task of building the road link. In the last week of October 1947, after a cabinet meeting, minister for works, N V Gadgil, recalled that Patel ‘took out a map and pointing to the Jammu-Pathankot area said that a 65 mile road between the two towns had to be made- capable of carrying the heavy army traffic before July 1948 i.e. within eight months. Within a fortnight necessary materials were assembled at worksite, around 10,000 workers were brought in special trains from Rajasthan and the entire workforce involved in round the clock job numbered over 40,000. The 65 miles were completed on time.’ Behind the success of the project lay Patel’s resolute mind.
Vallabhbhai made his first visit along with Baldev Singh, the defence minister on 3rd November and discussed the political and military situation.
Even in the judgement of Sheikh Abdullah, ‘events took a decisive turn’ after Vallabhbhai’s Srinagar visit. ‘The Sardar did not lose even one minute. He studied the situation and said that the enemy must be driven back.’ It was, thereafter, decided to establish a new divisional headquarters in Kashmir (Jammu and Kashmir Division). Indian forces occupied Baramulla and captured Uri. Later, for more effective military operation, the Jammu and Kashmir force was split into two divisional commands- Srinagar Division and Jammu Division. Important areas like the Leh-Ladakh valley and Poonch were recaptured by the Indian army, but a cease-fire was ordered by both army commands from midnight of 1 January, 1949. Patel did not believe in carrying the Kashmir operations half way through. He would have preferred the Indian Army not to halt at Uri or at Poonch, but to go beyond- possibly upto Muzaffarabad. General S P P Thorat confirms that ‘our forces might have succeeded in evicting the invaders, if the prime minister (Nehru) had not held them in check and later ordered the cease-fire...’
V T Krishnamachari in reply to Patel confirmed the thoughts of the public. ‘It is a blessing that inspite of initial handicaps, the situation in Kashmir has now improved. Kashmir, and all Indian states generally owe a deep gratitude to you and the government of India for the timely assistance which has preserved the integrity of Kashmir.’
Differences between Nehru and Patel on Kashmir
It is true that over the issue of Jammu and Kashmir both Nehru and Patel had differences of opinion as far as the method and approach of tackling the problem were concerned. Patel had a pragmatic and practical approach in dealing with Kashmir and preferred to take timely action whereas it seemed at times that Nehru had emotional attachment for Kashmir- the land of his ancestors and for Sheikh Abdullah. It also appeared that Nehru hesitated in taking firm steps as he was weighed down by international opinion and personal friendship.
Jawaharlal Nehru had taken away the Kashmir charge from Patel and decided to manage Kashmir himself as he thought that Abdullah was the key to Kashmir’s future and believed that Patel would mishandle him. Further, Nehru’s lack of frankness with Sardar Patel, regarding appointment of N Gopalaswami Ayyangar as minister without a portfolio to assist him in handling Kashmir had, inter alia, also contributed to their differences over the issue of Kashmir. Jawaharlal’s agreement, albeit on Mountbatten’s persuasion, to make a broadcast, offering a UN-controlled plebiscite in Kashmir was also opposed to Patel’s strong view of timely action in Kashmir and instead of bringing India’s affairs into the vortex of international politics. Patel said, ‘We should never have gone to the UNO... at the UNO, not only has the dispute been prolonged but the merits of our case have been completely lost in the interaction of power politics.’
Kashmir was Jawaharlal’s baby and to avoid clashes with Nehru over it, Patel adopted a bystander’s attitude, but helped whenever the situation demanded or he was called upon to do so. As far as Kashmir was concerned, Patel was provided with limited space, nevertheless, his timely, swift, decisive action saved Kashmir from the perils of imminent danger and ruthless invaders.
Sardar Patel’s mindset about the Kashmir issue can be gauged by the following incident from when he was acting as the prime minister in Nehru’s absence.
Patel sent for Air Marshal Thomas Elmhirst, chairman of the Chiefs of Staff Committee with whom he wanted to discuss a point relating to the Kashmir war. Elmhirst writes: ‘He was not well, and the meeting was in the sitting room of his home, and we were alone. He said something to this effect- ‘If all the decision rested on me, I think that I would be in favour of extending this little affair in Kashmir to a full-scale war with Pakistan... let us get it over once and for all.’
It is apt to mention here the findings of Jagmohan, ex-Governor of Jammu and Kashmir and close observer of Jammu and Kashmir polity, when he writes- ‘There are many ’ifs’ of history. No one can say with certainty what would have happened if a particular ‘ifs’ had materialised. But hard evidence with regard to integration of 565 States indicates that Sardar Patel’s approach would not have allowed the Kashmir problem to arise and even if any problem had arisen, it would have been nipped in the bud
Ankur Desai Patel initially was not interested in Kashmir as it was a predominantly Muslim majority state...but when Jinnah insisted on Junagarh then Patel changed his mind & insist on Kashmir
Big BS and lots of imagination. you have NO clue that Indian and Pakistan army was at that time or until 1950 headed by British general. and mountbatton was in control. we never had plane or bomber . stop BS
Patel was always wanted a kashmir, but he knews that kashmir is muslim majority state so, lets deal on other states first and control those states. So until the end he makes everyone confuse on kashmir and after took all other states in india sardar patel came to discuss kashmir issue in the end..he knews how to deal with kashmir....So, Patel was very clear that Kashmir will never been given up...lol...Jay Mataji.
All things happened because of the co-ordination . They had no difference in between Patel and Nehru.
which book
मुझे आपके इस वीडियो में प्रयोग के लिए एक शब्द पर बहुत दुख है इसमें आप पटेल जी को बर्थडे बॉय कह संबोधित कर रहे हैं यह बहुत दुर्भाग्यपूर्ण है क्योंकि पटेल इस देश के नेता ही नहीं बल्कि इस देश के लोगों के आदर्श है इसलिए ऐसे शब्दों का प्रयोग मुझे लगता है ऐसे व्यक्तित्व के लिए नहीं होना चाहिए...
Lallantop people r not mature enough
So colled...
. dallantop se aur kiya umeed ???
JNU के लोफरों से इससे अधिक उम्मीद भी नहीं की जा सकती
Completely agree with you, I had same feeling when I heard that.
Jab Pakistan pok sr nahi hata to Jan Mat Kya or Nehru ne UN me ja ke Kya ukhad liya.
What the headline says here is just the opposite of what Field Marshal Maneckshaw said in an interview 25-30 years ago on Kashmir. Maneckshaw narrated the meeting with Mountbatten, Nehru and Patel where he was present - the discussion item being the Pak irregulars attack on Kashmir, Srinagar just about to fall, and India’s military response. Nehru remained dilly dallying throughout the meeting and all along he was hesitating to commit the army into Kashmirs defence and kept on lecturing on the perils of war etc etc. Ultimately Sardar got upset and in a stern voice said “ Jawahar, do you want Kashmir for India or not ?” On that Nehru said “of course I want Kashmir to be a part of India”. Sardar Patel then turned to Maneckshaw and told him “ you heard the PM. Now go and do your job”. And that is how the Indian Army went into action and saved Kashmir. One must remember that as Deputy PM and Home Minister Sardar took on the responsibility of mergers of all riyasats into Bharat. On Nehru’s request, he left Kashmir Riyasat for merger with India to Nehru and of the 540 Riyasats only One that is Kashmir was left for Nehru to settle, and that too on his request. And we have this mess to clean up.
Excellent work...!!! History has its own time frame. And every incident had occurred in their boundries. So if we look in to History through the present time frame then if and but cases are playing an imaginary game that has no true relationship with the history...!! Now we must look in to the present incidents in present time frame because present will be the history for future.
Undoubtedly Patel was more deserving PM!
Not more than nehru
Lmao
Patel died in 1950 and first general elections were held in 1951! So how?
abey BEFKOOF , patel ji ka swargwas pehle election se pehle ho gaya tha
@@AyushYadav-ll1cp 1947 Provisional govt ka PM
There are several authentic books/documents other than the ones you have referred to. Read them also.
Name plz....
Any book name please ?
@@shashank2361the first q
Book name ???
किताब का नाम बताइए
Very informative and good. It is an eye opener. Thanks
Isi prakar ke video ki Ham kamana karte hain Sahab 🙏 🙏 Aapko Bahut bahut dhanyabad 🙏 Jai Maa Durge 🙏 Jai Sanatan 🙏 Jai Hind 🇮🇳
नेहरू अगर जम्मू-कश्मीर में संघर्ष बिराम की घोषणा रेडियो पर नहीं करते तो सेना जल्द ही जीत जाती
It is very simple, Pakistan was created for Muslims and HINDUstan was for Hindus. Whosoever allowed muslims to remain in HINDUstan was a traitor and had no farsightedness too see that again they will grow to become a majority after a century. How a guest can become owner of your house?
@@shyamsinghrawat2654 Agar teri bat mane to kashmir me 90% Muslim rahne ke bavjud bhi kashmir ko Pakistan me vilay, marge hone kyun nahi diya
Dik
@@shyamsinghrawat2654 जिनका दिमाग नहीं चलता, वे ऐसे ही सीधी सादी लकीर पर सोचते हैं
@@nazimayasmeenam2298 Kyunki unhone wahan ke 100% hinduon ko mar ke waha aabadi badhai
Sher E Bharat Sri Sardar Patel ji...Jindabaad Jindabaad...Jai Hind
लोहपुरुष
मुर्दाबाद किसने बोला?
@@sunilgawai6294 ye dallantop kr rhe indirectly...thumbnail dekho inka
Manipulate kr rh hai
Itna hi agr j&k ko bharat me milna tha
To usko special state ka darja kyu dia
Patel kashmir ko special state bnane k virodh me the
Or nehru ne usko special state bnane k liye open support kia
Ye manipulate Krna inka purana dhandha hai
@@proudlyindian9113 lekin shree vallab bhai patel bhi toh congress ke the na..?
Very well said This is most impactful and impartial analysis with facts.I don't understand why people degrade one of our own hero at the expense of our another hero.Both Nehru ji and Patel ji are our heroes.
Good explanation, unbiased explanation, Sardar Patel and Pandit Neharu both are heroes of India.
After reading the below comments... I can say that, We the Indians don't believe in facts. We are totally moved by emotions. I pray to almighty to give prudence to us to make the correct judgements...
Absolutely correct
They are still reading WhatsApp gyaan
@@sushrutsharma6927Pata Nahi kaun WhatsApp university se padha hai
Tumhe bhot believe hai ki is videoe Sab sach hai!??
@@andhkasur tum
@@progamers5936 mai kya?
Mahabharat teaches that when a leader of a country starts blaming past instead making it better then is no longer 'prajatantra' as it becomes 'rajtantra'.
Very true
Wrong....apki raahein kidhar se chali h wahi apki manzil btati.....we need to know truth abt our freedom
@@adkm986 i think thanos was ryt
He said 'insaan apne past ko zakhmo ki trh khoddta"
Aur jab tak ye apne past ko bhula nhi skte tab tak aane wale kal ko apna nhi skte
Ha to kr to rhe he 370 sulta diya CAA aa gya nrc ho rha assam me ucc aane vala he ye bahut important decisions the jo congress muslim appeasement ki vjh se nhi kiya...lekin muslim personal law board, vaqf board, vaqf act 1995 air 2013 le aayi sirf muslim public ko khush krne ke liye madarchox congress
Sahi kaha jaise modi ji hamesha past ko blame karte rehte hain ek mare hue vyakti par parliament me itni arguments hoti hai keval Nehru ji ke upar. Nehru ji se pehle desh zaroori hota h. Nehru ke baare me logon ke man me zeher gholke hoga bhi kya naa desh ki gdp badegi, naa corona jayega, naa development hoga, naa unemployment khatm hi hoga.
I do not like Congress, I do not like Gandhi and Nehru and I do not like Lallantop for their biased thoughts. Still, I love this episode. What a writing and what a delivery. Nice job, well done.
Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel ji 😎 jaisa koi nhi ho payega 😊
Love u patel sir
Respect sardar patel ❤❤
👌👌🙏🙏
Nehru ji_Patel ji doo bhai thye aur dono mein bahut pyar thaa👍
@@sushantakumarbehera8816 😅😅😅😅.......
@@sushantakumarbehera8816 nehru ji adwina ke aashik the ...
💯🙏💯
🚩जय हो सरदार पटेल🚩 सरदार पटेल वडाप्रधान होते तो आज भारत महासता होता 🚩कोई माई का लाल भारत उपर बुरी नजर से देखने की हींमत न करता,
पर पटेल का निधन 1950 में हुआ और आम चुनाव 1995 में हुआ
Nehru has done so many other great things for this nation there can not be any comparison.
आज़ादी के वक़्त देश जिस हालत में था उसे नेहरू और पटेल दोनो ने ही बड़ी जिम्मेदारी से सम्भाला। किसी के भी योगदान एयर काम को कम नही आंकना चाहिए। नेहरू बनाम पटेल करना निहायत ही गलत बात है। ये सिर्फ राजनीति है
You have done a good job...well explained
सरदार पटेल के योगदान को कम करने कि कोशिस मत करो राजनीति मे अगर सरदार ने रुचि लि होती तो प्रथम प्रधानमंत्री होते वे केवल देश सेवा तथा देश हित मे काम करते हुए अपना जीवन त्याग दिया
First home minister bhi to Patel hi the
Yo rajni time se dur kaise hue
Sath hu
100% right
Patel ne RSS ko ban kiya tha. Aap kis taraf ho ab btao
LAL BAL PAL ......Great person ........
superb we found many clearifications we should not blame our any world class freedom fighters 👍🙏 because According to Gandhiji Truth is God 🙏👍👍
Good. This is reality. Sardar patel dual policy was responsible for the crises of kasmir. Senior citizens of India
सच पूरा बताइये sir
नेहरू कश्मीर के मामले में गलती की हैं
पटेल ने नेहरू से पूछा
आपको कश्मीर चाहिए या नही
उसपर नेहरू ने कुछ नही बोला
इसलिए पटेल एक्सन में आ गए
Tu vha Beth kr unki baate sunn rha tha kya
पढ़ना आता है तो इतिहास जा कर पढलो
फिर पता चल जाएगा कि हम वहा थे या नही
यह पूरा घटना जम्मू कश्मीर का ह जब नेहरू और लार्ड माउण्ट बेटन साथ मे स्टेज पर बैठा था
फिर नेहरू भाषण देने के लिए उठा
Jis group me Mila h mujhe bhi add Kar lo
How many people from RSS fought against British? RSS was always working for British. Nehru was quiet because his answer was always yes. As a PM he naturally authorized Patel's action
Good episode 👍 what ever was done then must have been very difficult to decide.... Gandhi ji,Patel,Nehru did their best for the country in very tough circumstances......Now it is easy to criticize but present decisions will be criticized the same way after 50 years....Let us all believe in doing something for the people of our country....not just criticized.. 🙏
So India is seriously suffering in different places of India other Kashmir Pakistan nagaland etc.
S ur right
Gandhi and Nehru were idiot's.
Patel is Patel.Gandhi & Neharu gives
Black & bad future to next generation.
I think congress was in hurry to get political power. They were short sighted specially nehru afer death of patel and gandhi. Too emotional with little skill in negotiation. He kept Kashmir dangling instead of solving it. You can not blame anyone else except Nehru. Never forget he was PM for more than 14 years. He has plenty of time to resolve it. He was PM for 14 years after patel and Gandhi death. He never bother to solve serious problems of international boundries with Pakistan or China.
आपके द्वारा दी गई जानकारी बहुत अच्छी है मैं आपसे सहमत हू आपका विश्लेषण निष्पक्ष है
Bahut achha laga. Bahut hi santulit vislashan Kia hai Ap ne is video me.
You have SOLD YOUR SOUL for Just a few RMB.
🤔
Pandit Nehru passed away@my teens, there are no videos except the Films Divns news in cine theatres before the scheduled picture's exhibition in those days or the newspapers or monthlies like Soviet Bhoomi, now I am recalling those days firmly through this U+tune thank U!
Eye opening speech of Sri Pushpendra ji. ,Worth listening to his speeches.
I am blown away. I have been away from India for 17 years now and in these years, I have changed and I have learned a lot. I admire and appreciate the harmony with which diversity has prospered in India, over centuries - despite attempts to subvert the diversity. So I have been horrified watching the descent of India into fascist fantasies, fueled by illusions of a glorious past that was monochromatic. And, I have been more horrified talking to people - Indians - the abject lack of curiosity in learning about actual facts. Politicians and bureaucrats from the period have written books and papers. People do not read them but instead regurgitate old and tired urban legends about Indian politics. So I am delighted to find this show that seems to present a balanced and grown up view of issues - based on facts and trying to understand viewpoints, not cast issues as one vs the other.
Fair and impartial effort to know the past events. Keep on it. Nehru and Patel both were great patriots with unprejudiced mind keeping the national and people interest on top. Creating gap between them is a sinister political game.
I totally agree with you. There may have been minor differences of opinion but both of them were true friends and great patriot. Patel acnowledged that while his standing and support within the congress organisation was greater Nehru was far more popular among the masses and in the case of a direct election for the post of PM, would have won hands down.
How come it is impartial...how can the title made patel didnt want kashimr??
सब गलत बताना तेरी जिम्मेदारी है क्या.
सरदारजी पटेल जी अमर है !!!!!!!!!
💯🙏💯
आपने अच्छी जानकारी दी है। बहुत स्पष्ट रूप से तथ्य सामने रखे हैं। आप बधाई के पात्र हैं।
Awesome very informative
Keep it up
Patel was not in favour of going to UN but when Nehru announced it on Radio he has to accept it being part of Government. I personally have problem with the fact the patel wasn't given his due credit by next gen congress while Bharta Ratna was awarded to Nehru by Nehru Govt. and to Indira by Indira Govt. And how write could be grandson of MK Gandhi to write about indecisiveness of Sardar Patel although I got to know the perspective of JP for Patel. Thanks for that.
Get well soon
@@taarunsharrma5302 Wishing you the same.
@@taarunsharrma5302 yeh you can say that to WORLD BANK
That time the condition was not one side
it was not like that..though shown in the movie..:P :D Patel was always against plebiscite and voting for simple reason i.e. two nation theory ..which honestly says all and doesn't require further voting.. Bharat Ratna thing is separate obviously that's absurd but Patel and Nehru were not foes.. they were good friends worked together whole life...MK Gandhi's grandson has not said himself anything on Patel he has just gathered statements given by Patel at different times.. for me, it doesn't account for indecisiveness rather assessing situation and doing what seems right currently for the whole nation.. that's exactly the point is.. both did that from there prospective honestly(clean chit from my side :) ) ..few decisions by them have gone well .. rather perfectly well whereas few tanked like anything.. but it's that obvious? I m sure intent was not wrong and both wanted India to flourish.. may God bless the soul of both leaders..and finally if Patel was the first PM? well, Patel if really had serious issues with Nehru/ Gandhi would have never been part of govt till death almost.. yu hota to kya hota.. kon jane.. no sense talking or imagining that too :P :D
Nice video. I have read many books on this topic and overall I agree with you. And this is coming from a guy who absolutely loves Modi but also agree it was not Nehru's mistake. Request everyone to first read on the topic and then judge. Don't just assume anything from word of mouth. It's dangerous. And no need to use abusive language.
👍👍👍👍
Wonderful, unbiased expiation of Kashmir stalemate.
भाई आपकी बातें तो अच्छी लगी। परन्तु पूरा काश्मीर भारत का हिस्सा होना चाहिए। एसा होना बहुत जरूरी है।
Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel ❤️❤️
I Salute You Youngman, You Have Completely Explored All Events Related To Our Lovely Kashmir Fantastically .. I Also Request All Educated & Wise Indians To Not To Misguide The Other Innocent Indians On This Issue, Specially BJP Minded People. Jai Hind.... 🇮🇳
👏 👌
Writin
It always gave me pain whenever read about Kashmir and related matters, how the semi-baked and hate mongers blamed Nehru ji, for everything, these ungrateful people should read such vedios and keep their brains sane. Thank you Genleman for this great Vedio
The statement in the last is for everyone to ponder. If and buts are part and parcel of life. In history you can have your perspective as you want but you can't force your perspective on others..
Thank you for such a wonderful information about Kashmmeer.
Deepak kumar (New Delhi)
Sardar Patel is a great leader in whole india
Yes. Nehru too
@@PrajwalNanaiah Nehru ji
One of the greatest position of their time, there are no single, more also
Bose,gandhi, Patel, Nehru and Ambedkar....these 5 were greatest leaders of modern India.... comparable to any of greatest leaders of human history.
I have doubt about Savarkar..... should i include him here??
Agar patel sahab hummare desh ke pehele PM hote tho desh ka naksha hi alag hota koti koti naman patel sahab ko 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩
Bhai kese hote wo first pm 🙄
वो पीएम पद के उतना काबिल नही थे जीतना नेहरू
Pahle to Gandhi ji gaddar then ab Jawaharlal Nehru bola jata h n ki desh aazad hone ke bad beta bhi bap banjata h
Nikhil ji mughe nahi pata ke aap kis party ke side aur kis ke opposite bolte ho bus itna janta hu ke aap jo bhe bolte ho mughe bhuit achhaa lagata hai.the way you speaks it's very interesting and amazing.
God bless you.
A good presentation that open the door to find out the fact whether the accuse made agsinst Mr Nehru on Kashimir affairs .
इतिहास की सत्यता पर भी शक होना लाजमी है क्योंकि इतिहास लेखन भी किसी न किसी के पक्ष में ही होता है। जो लोग कांग्रेस पार्टी में एक परिवार के अलावा किसी को सुप्रीमो होने नही दिया, वो इतिहास में हीरो किसी और को कैसे बनने देते।
ये आपका विश्लेषण ऐसा ही है कि 20 से कम 19 भी नही है, दोनों खुश। ठीक है सम्मान दोनों लोगों का होना चाहिए लेकिन विश्लेषण निष्पक्ष होना चाहिए।
Modi joota a,
Abdul Zafin our sahi bol Rahul Gandhi Muslim hai
Patel ke likhe part padho
@@ajaydevkate1476 itne paglagaye ho ki ek hindu ko Muslim kehre Hai ho, jo b ho o chor nahi modi jaisa, or naa hi joota or naa hi Ambani ki gulam
@@hoodasaksham सरदार पटेल ने पूरे भारत भारत को एक सूत्र में बांधा उनको भुलाना सबसे बड़ी नाइंसाफी होगी, नेहरू से कही ज्यादा लोगो मे स्वीकार्यता थी लेकिन फिर भी pm नेहरू बने। इसलिए गांधी जी ने कहा था कि आजादी के बाद कांग्रेस को समाप्त कर देना चाहिए, नही तो एक परिवार केंद्रित कांग्रेस हो जाएगा जो आज सत्य है।
love from junagadh ❤️❤️
Jai girnari
पत्रकारिता आप के जैसी हो तो शायद इतिहास की ये भ्रांतिया खत्म की जा सकती है, जो हुआ जब हुआ वो हुआ,वर्तमान नेहरू और पटेल जैसे महापुरुषो में भेद करने के वजाय हम कैसे भविष्य को उज्जवल बनाते सकते है इस पर विचार सरकार को करना चाहिए
Perfect and balanced description.. I would suggest that you show as much as possible archival evidences in the video along with available speeches... What were the benefits of approaching UN and why Pakistan denied that should be explained with some more detail with archival material along with commentary of anchor... Instead of showing or using ambiguity ..try to explain why Patel played diplomatic role to handle international problem..
Patel respected a lot to gandhi so he never did disagree wth him
He looked gandhi as his godfather
The best first Prime Minister would be Subhash Chandra Bose
If Subhash Chandra Bose was there , there would have been no division of countries . Plus there would have been presidents rule like US .
काश, ऐसा होता!
Excellent analysis with supporting facts & figures.
आपने बहुत पुरानी बात को यथासंभव स्पष्ट करने का प्रयास किया और मुझे अच्छा भी लगा और मुझे यह लगा कि आपने जहां तक कोशिश की है इसे सही तरह से समझाने की यह बात सही भी है और मेरी बहुत सारी शंकाओं का समाधान इसमें अभी हुआ है जय श्री राम धन्यवाद
Sardar Patel was real deshbhakt. He was one of the best leader of our country. Out of 14 committees 13 were vote in favour of Sardar patel for select the first prime minister of India.
Yeah but unfortunately he passed away in 1950 and Election happened 1951-1952.
True but people of India have elected Nehru as PM in 1952, 57, 62 elections , so you cannot denie the fact
भारतीय स्वतंत्रता संग्राम में क्रांतिकारी सशस्त्र क्रांति पर 1858 से 1947 तक के इतिहास पर वीडियो बनावें
यस सर जी
Ndtv के बाद आपका चेनल ही भरोसेमंद है आपने इस वीडियो के माध्यम से काफ़ी कुछ बातो को सही दिशा में रखा 🙏🇮🇳🙏
उस समय की परिस्थितियों में सबने अपना अपना योगदान दिया सभी पर गर्व है 💜❤फिर भी सब एक साथ थे
Please provide all facts link on your video description included in this video .
Lallan आज सब सही झूठ बतायगा,कुछ दिन मे बोलेगा अभि सही जाणकारी करानी पडेगी की सही है या गलत इसलिये भरोसा मत कर.
This video has delibrately been made to save the face of Nehru.
Will u elaborate
why is it that Nehruji and other softline netas were never sent to Kalapani, because they diverted the anger of the Indian people to an impractical ways of non violence which also suited British because they were easier to handle. These type of netas were put in VIP jails and used to get all facilities which netas even today get in jails. Public was made fool then also and now also in the name of arrest of netas. Nehruji has written letters to Indira Gandhi from jail, that means he used to get freedom and time to write such letters. I dont know how many campaigns were led by Nehruji during Freedom struggle, yes but he participated in movements started by Gandhiji and used to keep him happy, which paid him when he Gandhiji overruled Patels selection as first PM in his favour. Yes he also kept Mountbattan and his wife happy and thus became their choice for first PM of India. British knew which Indian leaders will toe their line even when they leave the country. He messed up Kashmir issue is well known to all. And what he did during his 17 years of being PM is a different story. It is because of these social media platforms that people are knowing the truth. History is not being manipulated @Erina Khadka. That is why this video is made to save the face of Nehru. Read the comments of Ankur Desai below to know the truth.
@@Handle12456 , for once I say that all u told is right( cause I do not want to conflict with you ).
But tell me, what about veto power he gave to China.
India was offered veto power but he gave that to China.
There are many more mistakes he did, but i do not want to conflict.
Moreover, sardar patel told many thing about future of India which came true and also have suggestions which were denied by Nehru.
@@Handle12456 , I just want justification over veto power.
Today, this China uses veto power everytime to refuse Indias proposal in UN or other things
Initially sardar Patel was not Gandhi's follower. His views were different and from 1917 everything changed. But that doesn't mean Gandhi and sardar were competitors.
True analysis. Nehru and Patel both were great.