FBPP vs WBPP: Round 2 - Drizzle Data! FBPP can create drizzle files, do they Stack Up??

Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @setiv2
FBPP has the ability to generate drizzle files. In my Round 1 video I said drizzling was the main reason I will stick with WBPP. Viewers quickly pointed out that FBPP can generate drizzle files as well. You then have to manually run DrizzleIntegration.... but how well do the FBPP drizzle files stack up against WBPP drizzle??
Comments and suggestions appreciated!! We are still in the early days of FBPP, if they get drizzling correctly integrated I think we will have a strong contender to move away from WBPP.

[@AstroIsland]

Your first video hit the nail on the head. USE FBPP if you quickly want to see the results of your image. Use WBPP if you want to get serious about stacking and post processing your images with good quality.

[@setiv2]

Exactly!!

[@philleng480]

Great analysis - in detail - but sticking to the stuff that matters. Clear concise, efficient. Thank you.

[@josephluciani5531]

Great comparison Frank. Your visual presentation demonstrating the differences in contrast says it all. Thank you for the education.

[@JeffHorne]

Incredible. Your channel is just awesome. Thank you!

[@photonbucket]

Nice work. Thank you

[@astroguypodcast]

Thank you for posting these. Your videos have been VERY helpful!

[@mortenlerager4846]

Another reason why I stay with wbpp.

[@bobc3144L]

No free lunch! Thanks for the video.

[@elbass0]

I tried FBPP for the first time today. The results were absolutely horrendous. Not sure why.
EDIT: flats were to blame. FBPP actually works extremely well.

[@setiv2]

How many frames were you stacking? Used calibration frames? What were your results with the same data in WBPP?

[@elbass0]

@@setiv2 Right. I suspected there was something wrong with my flats and indeed, after only stacking the light frames, the results were really good. I actually have a hard time distinguishing the FBPP result from the WBPP result (at the highest quality settings).
I normally don't even take flats when imaging with OSC and using a 3nm dual band filter. Reason being that the flats get this intense reddish to blueish gradient which seems to cause issues when using them for calibration.

[@setiv2]

@@elbass0 weird. Flats shouldnt do that. If you want to follow up further with that issue you can always email me [e-mail]

[@sarahjanereilly9335]

Many thanks for that. Great video and so helpful for someone in my situation (also, I am not very techy, so very easy to comprehend).