How Did Salahuddeen Conquer Juresalem & He Was An Ash’ari! || Daily Da’wah
Vložit
- čas přidán 26. 07. 2024
- Donate towards this channels production here: gofund.me/98e2dbda
00:00 Who Was Salahuddeen Al Ayuubi
04:10 We Have Umar Ibn Khattab Who Conquered Jerusalem
09:45 What Was The Wisdom Behind Salahuddeen’s Victory?
11:39 We Don’t Base Our Actions On Virtue But Commandment!
14:30 It’s More Sense To Use Umar
Instagram: @DawahManReturns
Snapchat: dawahmanreturns
Facebook.com/Dawahman
Twitter: @Imranibnmansur
Email your questions to naseehasession@gmail.com
![THE HISTORY OF BID'AH [POWERFUL & SHOCKING]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/j9vxeZqZG-k/mqdefault.jpg)
![THE HISTORY OF BID'AH [POWERFUL & SHOCKING]](/img/tr.png)
May Allah swt have mercy on Salahuldin El-Ayoubi.
Ameen
@Alliance Imam Ghazali (rahimahullah) repented and left sufism before he died btw!
Salafism has nothing to do with the Saudi family. It was clear that Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab (rahimahullah) refuted the sufis and ahlul bidah, he changed the arabian peninsula from grave worship to tawheed based on Quran and Sunnah.
@Alliance I'm not a salafi. Just stating facts.
The only weed I do is 'Tajweed' btw.
@Alliance May Allah swt guide us and unite us brother. Salam.
@@aliaub75 carry on protecting your treacherous Royal Family. They have proven their alliance with the disbelievers but your cult was built upon protecting them so you have no choice either way.
Name: Yakob
Title: Settler colonialist
Origin: Brooklyn, US
Job: Stealing others houses
Reason: If i will not steal , someone else will do
@UCS6MPJTxNXCya2Jys2KJ0aA Brother these thick salafis will never listen, they only make up1% of the muslim population so just ignore them. Ask them this question, historically, what have the wasabi/najdi/pseudo salafis ever achieved? Absolutely NOTHING! Allah has never honoured them and never will honour them. Let them keep crying while the asharis/Maturidisand the "real" atharis keep gaining victory, inshallah !
Be humble my brothers and seek the truth, you are mocking none other than a brother in faith
@Alliance my brother your getting islam and race confused don't speak arrogantly
@Alliance turk are not ottoman they are dead you sold us 2 never will there be another one
Victory is given by the permission of Allah.
Three Questions For Every Ash’ari!
czcams.com/video/ucTUzmoz-NI/video.html
What do you have to say about Sultan Mehmed, the conqueror of Constantinople? Did the Messenger of Allah not praise the one under whose command Constantinople would be snatched from Christendom and made a part of Dar al-Islam? It is well known that he was Hanafi in jurisprudence and Maturidi in creed. He was also a member of the Naqshbandi Sufi order. Did the Messenger of Allah praise a man with a Deviant creed? How will the Wahhabis explain this?
Sadly some of these Salafis are extremely bigoted and sectarian like ibn Abdul Wahab who went around killing other Muslims in the Arabia Peninsula calling them apostates.
They will conquer it(Constantinople) with takbirs
@@Ibrahim.l20 you are sinful liar
There is not such sect called wahabi, He is not the one meant by the Hadith also the last part of the Hadith where it praises the leader is not authentic.
Aurangzeb alamgir was also a maturidi
To understand this video... please such this one before it:
The 3rd Conquest Jerusalem
czcams.com/video/9JCtoi_z2sc/video.html
May Allah keep you steadfast imran barakallahufeek
You can't dismiss it as a historical fact merely because it's part of our Islamic history and closely connected with our deen. I would say it once more. Allah honours his true slaves only. He honoured salahuddin as well and we should embrace this fact. As for his Aqeedah then we should leave it to Allah. Judging by the apparent it's clear that Allah honoured and granted victory to him
Allah granted victory to the usa now since they're the strongest. What exactly is your point? study before you write.
@@user-yq2if6ld9h What??
@@user-yq2if6ld9h He didn't grant USA a Islamic victory. Doesn't make sense!
Alexander conquered all of the known world
Is he a true slave of allah?
@@SajidAli-ip7ov how bruh
Interesting
Doesn't matter what the brother was alhamdollillah he was Muslim
@Said Bale asharis are still considered ahle sunnah in some cases.
And Nur al-Din Zengi d.1174 was a Hanafi as stated by Ibn Athir in al-Kamil Fi al-Tarikh.
Alukum Salam
The author of the collection of books, "Al-Bahr Al-Muhit" behind you was also Ash'ari lol
'According to Ahlus Sunnah he's Aqidah was a deviation'
According to you and your ilk, when they get out of the Hejaz, then victory will be granted again to the Ummah too.
You can't reconcile your views with the great figures of classical Sunni Islam because none held your views or understanding.
Pseudo Salafi Mufti ibn Baz gave hukm for America to use Arabia as a Launch
Pad into Iraq
Mehmet al Fatih al Hanafi al Maturidi, conqueror of Constantinople
These Wahabi reprobates think they are on the Haq. Their contribution to Islam nil. They are bloodthirsty deviants who have caused nothing but fitna in the Muslim Ummah. They are the accursed Khawaarij of our times
The Hadith of the Najd is applied to these miscreants.
Wa alaykumu s-salam wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh ustadh
Salaam
allow it bro sallahudeen may allah have mercy on him.
shame on you for talking like this.
وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته
Love these daily dawa’ah
Lol you deleted all the comments proving you wrong loooooooool
I was just watching the movie, The Kingdom Of Heaven, with Salahuddin.
It mirrors a whole lot of what we all have seen recently in Gaza.
If the Ashari or Maturidi Islam never existed at the time of the Prophet (PBUH) or Umar (RA) and came about in the third century. Then Salafi Islam only began in the 19th century.
@احمد ناجدي Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab was born in 1703 , please do not be so arrogant or delusional. You follow his interpretation of the salaf, and now there are even disagreements on the true message and preachings of Abdul Wahab between his followers. You do not have access to the the Salaf directly in 2022.
Donate towards this channels production here: gofund.me/98e2dbda
Salam u alaykum ustadh are u ganna be doing mad ting in the masjid after lockdown
Beautiful answer. Don't see why people are hating
Really needed this topic to be spoken on because i always had this little itch about salahudeen that i was trying to ignore
@SaracenGamer salahudin lives more than 100 years before ibn taymiyaah was born . Salafis are deluded soon they will say ibn taymiyah was a sahabi😂😂😂
@ابو بكر ابن محمد البربري I love ibn taymiyah and I have nothing but respect for the salafia but they need to stop attacking other people and removing them from the fold of Islam . And making detailed issues that most people never understand part of the core aqeeda . We are all brothers . The plight of Palestine should teach us this
@ابو بكر ابن محمد البربري Who are you to remove or add anyone?
@ابو بكر ابن محمد البربري lol no one made Takfir of them ya habibi . The made tabdii3 which means an labeling them as innovators .
@ابو بكر ابن محمد البربري who is we,
First view
This is a very interesting topic. Please speak about it more in the future, and include what the great scholars have to say in greator detail Insha Allah.
He is not a scholar
Don't listen to him
10:31
The one called Khalifa in the sky a hanafi maturidi shadhilli sufi how is that
Madkhalis - literally achieved nothing for Islam, except solidifying the rule of tyrants.
Salahudeen - achieved victory against an unbelievable odds, maintained the highest example of behaviour and good action as a believer.
Dawah man refers to him as an individual with an aqeedah of 'deviance and corruption'.
The reality is, what needs to be asked, is if you were alive during the time of Salahudeen would you support him in his war?
No. You'd call him a mubtadi.
We seek refugee in Allah from these Neo-khariji views.
Aamiin
Ameen
And what exactly are you saying. Nonsalafis call salafis takfeeris yet you guys call us takfeeris with no basis while we call those that commit grave worship, attribute divinity to other than Allah, and say things against Allah that Allah said are kufr i.e. saying things about Allah that Allah did not say about himself (Allah is everywhere). So deal with facts rather than with ignorance.
Why do you lie? Rather, the Atharis are with the Prophet (ﷺ), the Sahaba, the Tabi'in, the Taba Tabi'in, and the righteous.
They are the ones who supported the message when it was most vulnerable; they fought at Badr, Yarmuk and Al-Qadisiyyah; they were the first to conquer Al-Quds; they ultimately established a Caliphate which stretched from Iberia to Sindh.
Perhaps you did not know, but there were indeed Atharis present in the army of Salahuddin.
For example, Ibn Qudamah. A Hanbali scholar of the Athari creed. He served as a general in the army, and participated in the battle to recapture Al-Quds in 583 AH. The campaign was a success, and Al-Quds was returned to Muslim hands.
Wallahi no one cannot judge the events of the past because Salahudeen Al-Ayubi رحمه الله was an Ash'aree, Allah granted him victory and you cannot judge him with today's standards‼️ you're doing what the haters of Islam are doing‼️ they're cherry picking events that happened in the past and isolating them in order to turn it into a major problem, wallahi this is a sickness of the heart‼️ what can those who hate do that Salahudeen Al-Ayubi did in order to raise the honor of the deen and protect Islam from the attacks of the crusading enemies ⁉️ it is said Salahudeen Al-Ayubi loved to follow the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ in Jihad and he wanted to become a scholar and sorounded himself with the scholars‼️ he spent all his wealth to the point where he went broke and even after the crusaders came in waves again during the third crusade with Richard the Lion Heart of England, Frederick Barba Rosa the German emperor who died drowning in a puddle of shallow water and had a humiliating end. In the end the people were going to abandon him in the end, he pleaded to Allah to help him and ALLAH saved the Muslims in the end until the crusaders gave up and abandoned their cause.
May Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala bless the ashari and the maturidi
Ashari and maturidi is problematic
@@Emsyaz
Salafi are deviant.
All these mental gymnastics just to discredit the Ashari's? The Athari's & the Mutakalims can both be good or bad Muslims. Some of the greatest scholars of this tradition are Ashari's Imam Al-Bayhaqi, Imam Nawawi, the two Ibn Hajar's, Imam Suyuti, Ibn Khaldun, Imam Al-Qurtubi, Imam Al-Ghazali, Qadi Abu Bakr ibn al-Arabi Al-Maliki etc. Point is the ummah has been blessed with great scholars from both Atharis and the Mutakalims. The idea that the Mutakalims are all astray is strange and it is an extreme position.
Personally, I align more with the Athari's than the Ashari's but I recognise that the people of Kalam also have truth with them and the evidence is clear. Also, your point that Salahuddeen Al Ayuubi (R.A) may not deserve victory because he is Ashari is very arrogant. The Muslim Ummah should unite as the Prophet (PBUH) advised us to. What brings us together is more than what divides us. This issue of attribute of God is not a big issue in our time, our brothers are not even praying regularly, they are backbiting each other, Muslims are falling short in Ibadah and akhlaq. We need to focus on this, focus on reviving the outward sunnah and calling people to improve their inward state.
May Allah (SWT) forgive you and me, continue to guild us to the right path, unite this ummah and give us victory.
Umar Bin Khattab wasn't a Wahhabi either so what is your point, lol? The people of sound creed are the Asha'ariyya, Maturidiyya and Athariyya. All three theological schools come under Ahlu Sunnah Wal Jama'ah. They are all Muffawids and have creedal chains going back to the pious three generations of Islam whilst your ilk are people of deviance and innovation due to your literalism and anthropomorphism. Plus, your kind have nothing to do with the Hanbali creed as many unorthodox Hanbali scholars today have exposed your deviation.
Sultan Salahdin was an Asha'ari in creed and Shafi'i in Fiqh. He was taught by Imam Ibn Asakir (RA) who was one of the greatest hadith scholars of the middle ages and refuted ahlul bid'ahs such as your ancestors who are not Ahlul Hadeeth like he was, btw. Sultan Mehmed (RA) was a Maturidi in creed and Hanafi in Fiqh. He fulfilled the prophecy of the conquest of Constantinople and prophet Muhammed (PBUH) praised him. This is a sign who is upon haq not to mention majority of the greatest scholars of the past that dominated all Islamic sciences and the mujaddids and the conquerors were mostly all Asha'ari and to top that off, majority of the ummah are Asha'ari and Maturidi.
How do the scholars of Ahlus Sunna wal Jama'a deal with unambiguous verses regarding the attributes of Allah? They negate the howness (nafi al kayf) and consign the meaning (tafweed al-ma'n) of them to Allah.
Imam Ahmad ibn Muhammad al-Khallal, who died in Hijra year 311, and who took his fiqh from Imam Ahmad’s students, relates in his Kitab al-Sunna through his chain of narrators from Hanbal ibn Ishaq al-Shaybani, the son of the brother of Ahmad ibn Hanbal’s father, that Imam Ahmad was asked about the hadiths mentioning, "Allah’s descending," "seeing Allah," and "placing His foot on hell"; and the like, and Ahmad replied: "We believe in them and consider them true, without ‘how’ and without ‘meaning’ (bi la kayfa wa la ma‘na)."
This position is held by the Asha'ari, Maturidi and traditional Hanbalis but unfortunately, the pseudo-Salafis contradict the creed of Imam Ahmed Bin Hanbal (RA), NOT the two Islamic hero's who are loved by Allah actually follow the above. They were much closer to Umar than you Joker Man
czcams.com/video/5Uk7JZClm_o/video.html Plz ignorant person listen to what an actual scholar has to say abt your deviant Asharis. Giving proofs from the salaf. Just because Asharis are the majority does not in any way mean that they are right. Only a truly stupid person would think that way. May Allaah guide you.
@@yas60031 Sorry, I believe in the Sunnah of prophet Muhammed (PBUH) and our prophet (PBUH) said the majority will not be misguided and he advised us to follow the majority. All the ulama all over the world ascribe to these two theological madhabs. You Wahhabis only came recently and were created by Allah to be nothing more than a fitna to the ummah but inshallah, we shall prevail in dealing with ahlul bid'ah (anthropromorphists) just like your ancestors i.e. Hashwiyya, Karramiyya, Muqatiliyyah and etc. By the way, I don't know any "Wahhabi" that deserves the title of a scholar with all due respect.
Anas bin Malik said:
“I heard the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) say: ‘My nation will not unite on misguidance, so if you see them differing, follow the great majority.’”
Reference: Sunan Ibn Majah 3950
There are many other hadiths to support this narrative.
is a Daif Hadith🤣🤣🤣
Not Only Salah Aldien and Mouhammad al fatih are the true Sunni that Allah granted victory. Prophet Mouhammad said “Verily, you shall conquer Constantinople. What a wonderful army will that army be, and what a wonderful commander will that conqueror be.”5 This is the famous “conquest hadith,” tell us that this Ashary/Maturidi is the true believe of ahlu al Sunnah Stay away from wahabies.
you should become deobandi then as well cause we afghans defeated America and the taliban army is mostly deobandi and salafi plus when we fought soviets many saudi's came in here to fight red army as well of shia so just cause allah made someone win a war doesn't make them right or wrong
the hadith about Constantinople lets if it were not daif it only says its a great army and great commander in no way this means now whatever he did and his army such as rape stealing and killing people was right or the brother killing of ottomans and all the things they till today
There is only one authentic hadith that can be attributed to the Ottomans, and that is the prophecy that the city of Heraclius (meaning Constantinople) will be conquered before the city of Rome. And that's what happened, al-Ḥamdu lillāh.
As for the untainted victory, that will happen shortly before the emergence of the Dajjal.
@@Nima-ec4tr May Allāh grant peace and prosperity to our Afghan brothers and sisters after so many years of war...
After 7 mins, you talk about the truth of Umar r.a in his words and actions. He r.a spoke the language of haqq as we know and agree. Then why do you go against him in the issue of 20 rakats of Taraweeh during Ramadan? Cognitive dissonance at its finest
Salahuddin was a warrior, not a scholar. So question to all the Sufis, Asharis and Maturidis. Since when is the correctness of an Aqeedah proved through warrior-hood. He was a great fighter and may Allah forgive him all his shortcomings. The Sufi, Ashari and Maturidi Aqeedah is extremely wrong and many of their believers were just born into it and follow what their fathers and forefathers used to do. May Allah guide them
He was a great scholar of Islam and also he promoted the Ashari madhhab so by the lunatic salafi logic he was a heretic who promoted heresy
@@abdulhafidhahmed1556 great scholar of islam? Provide daleel brother.
@@AbdurrahmanAlKurdi If you read his biography from any source you will see that he was forced by circumstances to become sultan. he wanted to live as a scholar
but any way the asharis have an Nawawi, Suyuti, Ibn Hajar, Ghazali, Izz ibn AbulSalam, Imam al Haramain and many others t vouch for the Tawfiq that Allah gave the madhhab
Habibi it’s not that, the issue I have is that you fellas see all as bidah or misguided who are not upon the salafi manhaj. I may be wrong. But that’s what I think. And the funny thing is that you fellas say this without knowing that most Islamic figures you yourselves look up to, praise and romanticize. Were people of “bidah or misguidance” as you guys put it. May it be Mohammad al fatih, Salahuddin, imam Shamil and etc. All of these great men were sufis. You see that’s the issue. Saying that the suffiya, Maturidis and Asharis were all kafir, misguided and etc. Is something you have to apply fully and not only to some. And that’s the issue.
And also a note, most sufis and Maturidis were born into their Aqeedah isn’t true one bit. Imam Shamil. A great warrior and scholar. Was a Naqshbandi Sufi. He wasn’t merely born into this deen. He studied! Abdel Qadir al Jazairi who was a great resistance fighter. Was an scholar. Please let’s not try to make it seem as if these great man were mere muqallids.
@@theraising_4733 Brother the one and only way is Quran and Sunnah. All these creeds you mentioned are based upon foolish philosophy. Allahs Description of his attributes is sufficient. Who knows Allah better than himself. And claiming that Salafis call every Ashari, Maturidi and Sufi kafir is simply wrong and a lie. But I am not into a debate with you, there are dozens where your scholars have been utterly defeated, just look up ustadh abdurahman hassan vs sheikh asrar rashid. Again, a firm aqeedah isn‘t proven through warrior-hood. Assalamu Alaikum
Why are you saying Rehmatullah Tala after Salahudin's name if he was a innovater? Why dont you extend the same courtesy to other Asharis then?
We are also Salafi but you Madkhali worshippers of Saud Clan have lost the plot completely.
The points you made are pretty weak as well.
The real reason Allah (swt) gave victory to the likes of Sultan Salahudin, Sulan Fatih, Suleyman, Sultan Aurangzaib etc in my personal opinion is because 1. they were Ajami non-Arabs and so Allah (swt) did not hold them to same strict standard as Arabs who have Islam revealed in their primary language. 2. They were the best of their time because they inherited the traditions from weak and stagnant Arab Caliphates on the verge of collapse and the true Athari Creed of Sahaba and Salaf had become obscure and weak. 3. Allah (swt) raised up decent acceptable Muslims to defend the lands of Islam from Crusader onslaught - not wait for the Muslims to get their act together as a whole because the threat was immediate (Mecca was next)...although it wasnt long after Allah (swt) raised the likes of Ibn Taymiyyah and his students to rectify the Creed as well at thr mid-point of the Ummah (approx 700 after Hijrah and also 700 years from our time). 4. Salahudin and Fatih etc took extraordinary asbab/means to Victory which is actually a Sunnah. If a Salafi correct in Aqeedah doesnt plant a Tree and a Non-Muslim does...well the Salafi will get the reward in Akhirah for having corrdct Aqeedah but the mon-Muslim is going to get the dunya harvest. So Aqeedah is super important and a neglected factor in our times but its 1 of several reasons for Victory. If they clock 4 out of 5 reasons Allah will not withold his fadl because the Ulema of the time taught them mistaken incorrect principles.
and Allah knows best - may Allah forgive us and pardon our faults
I admire that you want to defend Muslim heroes from this ignoramus, but your assertion that Wahhabi aqida is the correct aqida, and that they have pure Arabic is laughable. The Greatest books on the Arabic language have been written by Ash’aris.
Discusting
We must all speak against this guy. He insults Muslim heroes.
He was sunni and followed tasawuff
All of u barking in the comment section claiming it I have tawheed and being athari u have achieved nothing all together what salahuddin achieved
But yet. You believe that Allah has 2 hands 🙌
So you reject what the prophet said... and why are you comparing your hands to Allah's Hands. The Quran clearly says there is nothing like Him or comparable to Him.
@@musfiqurkashem346 I agree. But that doesn’t stop you Wahhabis from believing that Allah has 2 hands 🙌
@@Gog3453 okay so you agree so why should "wahabbis" stop believing that if that is clearly what the Prophet said? And tell me how using one of Allah's attributes as an insult is okay? Don't you also know that the Quran says not to name call even though I don't understand how using Wahab is an insult.
@@musfiqurkashem346 you got it all twisted. When the Wahhabis were on their killing spree of Muslims in the name of tawheed. They called themselves Wahhabis. This is history
@@musfiqurkashem346 and the prophet (as)never said that Allah had 2 hands 🙌 nor will you find it🫤
Shame on you
Bidah Bidah Biadah !!!!!
- as shaykh al wahabi al AbdulSaud . ( May Allah Forgive all the murders and wine parties of Saud Family ) . 🤡
Bid'ah is a serious issue that will lead you to the Fire if you're not careful. (Sunan al-Nasā’ī 1578)
But excusing the Saudi clan whenever they do haram deeds is cringe. May Allah guide us all.